Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Hydrothermal liquefaction vs. fast/flash pyrolysis for biomass-to-biofuel conversion: new insights and comparative review of liquid biofuel yield, composition, and properties

Farid Alizad Oghyanous a and Cigdem Eskicioglu *ab
aUBC Bioreactor Technology Group, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC V1 V 1 V7, Canada. E-mail: cigdem.eskicioglu@ubc.ca; Tel: +1 250 807 8544
bICREA – Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, Barcelona, Spain

Received 12th September 2025 , Accepted 12th September 2025

First published on 26th September 2025


Abstract

Correction for ‘Hydrothermal liquefaction vs. fast/flash pyrolysis for biomass-to-biofuel conversion: new insights and comparative review of liquid biofuel yield, composition, and properties’ by Farid Alizad Oghyanous, et al., Green Chem., 2025, 27, 7009–7041, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5GC01314C.


Authors have made three modifications to the published review article to provide better clarity to the discussion.

1. The beginning of the second paragraph in section 2.2.2 Hydrothermal liquefaction, has been modified to clarify the mention of organic solvent, whereby:

“Instead of utilizing the moisture of biomass as the solvent, organic solvents are also investigated in HTL as they play a key role in bio-crude oil yield. The selection of solvent affects both the temperature needed to achieve the maximum bio-crude yield in the HTL process and the overall yield of bio-crude oil.” has been modified to “While HTL is conventionally defined as a TP occurring in water or aqueous media, some studies have also explored the use of organic solvents or co-solvents to enhance bio-crude oil yield and alter reaction severity. Reaction media play a critical role in determining product yield and composition; the choice of solvent can influence both the optimal reaction temperature and the resulting bio-crude oil yield.”.

2. Tables 1 and 2 have been modified by reporting the maximum liquid biofuel yields on a dry basis (db) whenever both the product and feedstock weights were clearly defined on a dry basis to enable more meaningful comparisons. If a different yield basis was used in the original reference, it is now explicitly indicated in parentheses in the table. Sources where the yield basis was not specified are indicated with footnote b.

Table 1 Biomass elemental composition, ash content, and operational conditions for fast/flash pyrolysis of various biomass for maximizing pyrolysis oil production
Biomass T (°C) Residence time (s) Particle size (mm) Reactor type Max. pyrolysis oil yielda (wt%, (db)) Ref.
Name C (wt%) H (wt%) N (wt%) O (wt%) Ash (wt%)
a Maximum pyrolysis oil yield is reported on a dry basis (db). If the dry basis was not specified in the original reference, the reported yield basis (wt%) is indicated in parentheses. b References where the yield basis was not specified in the source.
Lignocellulosic biomass
Kraft lignin 399.85 Fixed bed 24.30 55b
499.85 30.20
599.85 26.00
Wood chips 399.85 57.40
499.85 65.40
599.85 71.10
Oat straw 44.11 5.98 0.62 43.65 5.64 500 0.75–2.50 0.25–0.75 Drop tube 51.16 56b
600 28.51
700 8.47
Corn straw 43.12 6.19 1.44 35.68 13.57 500 0.75–2.75 52.09
600 26.30
700 9.41
Palm kernel shell 48.82 5.68 0.42 45.08 3.87 600 5.00–6.00 0.075–0.125 Entrained flow 42.48 6
700 56.13
800 46.01
900 37.92
Microalgae
Chlorella vulgaris 43.75 6.07 7.86 41.61 5.54 600 5.00–6.00 <0.105 Entrained flow 6
700 42.24
800 43.63
900 45.37
Scenedesmus sp. 32.10 4.80 5.30 22.10 35.20 480 2.00 2.00 Fluidized bed 55.00 (dry ash-free) 57
Chlorella vulgaris remnant 45.04 6.88 6.64 29.42 8.34 500 0.42–0.70 Fluidized bed 28.20 41
Macroalgae
Saccharina japonica 32.89 6.17 0.93 60.01 20.21 350 <3.00 0.30–0.50 Bubbling fluidized-bed 44.99 (including water) 58
375 40.21 (including water)
400 37.41 (including water)
425 30.75 (including water)
450 28.40 (including water)
500 26.67 (including water)
Ulva lactuca 33.60 5.10 3.30 28.20 29.10 550 0.50–2.00 <1.00 Centrifugal 65.00 (dry ash-free) 59
Seaweed powder 36.44 5.14 3.72 39.36 14.71 400 60.00 Thermogravimetric analyzer 23.57 60
500 31.87
600 36.87
700 37.99
Municipal sludge
Mixed activated and primary sludge 38.30 5.00 3.40 37.30 16.00 400 1.70 1 Fluidized bubbling bed 48.00 61
500 53.00
Digested sewage sludge 25.50 4.50 4.90 25.80 37.20 450 <1.00 0.50–3.00 Conical spouted bed 70.00 (dry ash-free) 43
500 77.00 (dry ash-free)
600 70.50 (dry ash-free)
Sewage sludge 40.60 7.10 7.70 41.20 37.20 450 <100.00 ms 0.50–3.00 Conical spouted bed reactor 71.30 (dry ash-free) 62
500 77.00 (dry ash-free)
600 72.30 (dry ash-free)
Food waste
Waste fish oil 525 17.00 Continuous pilot plant tubular 72.83 (including water) 63
Potato peel waste 43.80 6.00 4.10 46.20 9.30 450 8.00 1 Laboratory auger 22.70 64b
Potato peel waste residue 47.80 6.40 4.00 41.80 6.50 25.60
Grape seeds powder 50.90 5.40 2.50 36.90 4.10 750 600.00 Oven 28.92 65b
850 32.56


Table 2 Biomass elemental analysis, ash content, and operational conditions for HTL of various feedstocks for bio-crude oil production
Biomass Solvent T (°C) Residence time (min) Pressure (bar) Max. bio-crude oil yielda (wt%, (db)) Ref.
Name C (wt%) H (wt%) N (wt%) O (wt%) Ash (wt%)
a Maximum bio-crude oil yield is reported on a dry basis (db). If the dry basis was not specified in the original reference, the reported yield basis (wt%) is indicated in parentheses. b References where the yield basis was not specified in the source.
Lignocellulosic biomass
Corn stover 43.57 5.84 0.56 49.98 6.96 Water 250 0.00–60.00 75.84–234.42 22.20 at 15 min and 110.31 bar 97b
300 29.25 at 0 min and pressure of 151.68
350 17.70 at 15 min and 179.26 and 217.18 bar
375 14.25 at 15 min and pressure of 196.5 and 241.31 bar
Wheat straw 42.15 6.21 0.82 50.82 6.92 K2CO3 400 15.00 320.00 22.00 (dry ash-free) 98
Eucalyptus 47.85 5.81 0.10 46.23 1.15 28.00 (dry ash-free)
Pinewood 49.90 6.30 0.30 42.80 0.59 27.00 (dry ash-free)
Rice straw 36.20 5.20 0.70 40.30 Milli-Q water, tap water, seawater, recycled wastewater, industrial wastewater 350 30.00 180.00 36.40 in industrial wastewater 99b
Microalgae
Chlorella vulgaris 52.60 7.10 8.20 32.20 7.00 Water, Na2CO3, HCOOH 350 60.00 38.00 in water (dry ash-free) 100
Nannochloropsis occulta 57.80 8.00 8.60 25.70 26.40 37.50 in water (dry ash-free)
Spirulina 55.70 6.80 11.20 26.40 7.60 31.00 in water (dry ash-free)
Porphyridium creuntum 51.30 7.60 8.00 33.10 24.40 22.00 in water (dry ash-free)
Scenedesmus obliquus 33.40 4.70 4.40 16.50 40.80 Water 250 7.00–30.00 175–225 21.50 (dry ash-free) 101
300 225–270 31.00 (dry ash-free)
350 260–280 35.05 (dry ash-free)
Chlorella sp. 56.20 6.90 7.70 28.70 11.70 Water 350 1.40 180.00 39.70 (dry ash-free) 102
5.80 36.80 (dry ash-free)
Macroalgae
Sargassum tenerrimum 32.10 4.70 0.93 60.72 26.50 Water, C2H5OH 260 15.00 45.00–120.00 18.50 in C2H5OH 103b
280 25.20 in C2H5OH
300 20.00 in C2H5OH
Ulva fasciata 25.40 Water 280 15.00 12.00 104
Enteromorpha sp. 23.20 280 7.00
Sargassum tenerrimum 32.00 280 9.00
Enteromorpha prolifera 28.75 5.22 3.65 32.28 30.10 Water, 5% Na2CO3 220 5.00–60.00 9.60 at 30 min in water 105b
240 12.50 at 30 min in water
260 18.24 in 5% Na2CO3 at 30 min
280 19.80 in 5% Na2CO3 at 30 min
300 23 in 5% Na2CO3 at 30 min
320 17.65 at 30 min in water
Municipal sludge
Swine manure 46.02 6.10 2.57 45.31 11.45 Water 350 15.00 33.00 (dry ash-free) 106
Sewage sludge 51.94 7.28 8.33 32.44 25.10 37.00 (dry ash-free)
Mixed primary and secondary sludge 47.90 5.70 3.70 32.30 9.80 Water 350 15.00 170.00 38.50 107
Primary sludge 47.80 6.50 3.60 34.10 7.50 34.70
Secondary sludge 43.60 6.60 7.90 25.00 16.20 20.00
Dehydrated sewage sludge 15.60 2.30 1.00 13.70 67.40 Water, 2.28 aqueous phase: 1 water 330 30.00 250.00 30.50 in cycle 2 in water and aqueous phase (dry ash-free) 108
Food waste
Food waste 48.18 7.3 4.52 39.73 5.40 Water 280 30.00 29.00 109
310 30.00
340 40.00
Food waste 47.80 5.11 4.78 42.10 3.30 Water 200 30.00 353 11.80 110
300 30.00 353 28.80
350 30.00 138–357 37.4 at 169 bar
400 30.00 353 30
500 1.00 and 30.00 353 23 at 1 min
600 1.00 and 30.00 353 30.5 at 1 min
Mixed synthetic food waste 56.16 8.05 2.61 33.19 4.68 Water 280–360 10.00–60.00 12–110 46.9 at 360 °C and 40 min (dry ash-free) 111


3. Fig. 6 has been modified to reflect levoglucosan as the major product.


image file: d5gc90176f-f6.tif
Fig. 1 Plausible reaction pathways of pyrolysis of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and lignin.138,340–344

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


Footnote

Current address: GEMMA – Group of Environmental Engineering and Microbiology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya – Barcelona Tech, c/Jordi Girona 1-3, Building D1, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.