Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Redox-active conductive metal–organic framework with high lithium capacities at low temperatures

Yogendra Kumar a, Tae Hyeong Kim b, Iyan Subiyanto ac, Winda Devina a, Segi Byun a, Subhajit Nandy d, Keun Hwa Chae d, Suim Lim e, Bumjin Kim b, Sanghui Kang b, Seong Ok Han a, Kanghoon Yim *e, Jungjoon Yoo *b and Hyunuk Kim *ac
aHydrogen Convergence Materials Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea. E-mail: hyunuk@kier.re.kr
bEnergy Storage Research Department, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. E-mail: jjyoo@kier.re.kr
cEnergy Engineering, University of Science and Technology, 217 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
dAdvanced Analysis Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, 5, Hwarang-ro 14-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
eEnergy AI & Computational Science Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea. E-mail: khyim@kier.re.kr

Received 7th August 2024 , Accepted 7th August 2024

First published on 6th September 2024


Abstract

Correction for ‘Redox-active conductive metal–organic framework with high lithium capacities at low temperatures’ by Yogendra Kumar et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA01779J.


The authors regret that on the fifth page of the original article, the sentence beginning ‘When the cycling performance of SKIER-5 was tested…’ contained an error. The current density referred to should have been ‘2C (907 mA g−1)’, rather than ‘200 mA g−1’. Similarly, the original caption of Fig. 2(d) referred to ‘Cycling stability and coulombic efficiency at 200 mA g−1’ for the SKIER-5 sample; this too should be corrected to ‘Cycling stability and coulombic efficiency at 2C (907 mA g−1)’.

An error has also been corrected in the supplementary information (SI). In Table S2 on page 8 of the SI, the entry for SKIER-5 which read ‘700 mA h g−1 after 1600 cycles at 200 mA g−1’ previously has been updated to ‘600 mA h g−1 after 1600 cycles at 2C (907 mA g−1)’. Please refer to the original article web page to access the supplementary information.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024