Armando
Navarro-Huerta
a,
Antonio
Juárez-Calixto
a,
María Eugenia
Sandoval-Salinas
b,
Yoarhy A.
Amador-Sánchez
c,
Joelis
Rodríguez-Hernández
d,
Alejandra
Núñez-Pineda
ae,
Mario
Rodríguez
f,
Rachel
Crespo-Otero
b and
Braulio
Rodríguez-Molina
*a
aInstituto de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior S/N Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacan 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. E-mail: brodriguez@iquimica.unam.mx
bUCL Department of Chemistry, London WC1H 0AJ, UK
cLaboratorio de Fisicoquímica y Reactividad de Superficies (LaFReS), Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior S/N Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
dCentro de Investigación en Química Aplicada (CIQA), Boulevard Enrique Reyna Hermosillo No. 140, Saltillo 25294, Coahuila, Mexico
eCentro Conjunto de Investigación en Química Sustentable (CCIQS) UAEM-UNAM, Carretera Toluca-Atlacomulco Km 14.5, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico
fResearch Group of Optical Properties of Materials (GPOM), Centro de Investigaciones en Óptica, CIO, Apdo. Postal 1-948, 37000 León, Guanajuato, Mexico
First published on 15th August 2024
Herein, we report the characterization of two hydrogen-bonded cocrystals, termed AC-TFTA and AC-PFBA, with mechanofluorochromism upon grinding. The heating of single crystals of AC-TFTA promotes microscopic displacements due to a decarboxylation process, which was studied through calorimetry-based techniques, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and hot-stage microscopy. Using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and UV-Vis/fluorescence spectroscopy, we demonstrated that AC-TFTA displays sharper photophysical changes than its analog AC-PFBA, attributable to differences in the energies of their non-covalent interactions. Furthermore, the reversibility of the amorphous phase in both cocrystals was explored. However, fatigue tests led us to conclude that AC-TFTA displays potential for application as an anticounterfeiting agent, in contrast with the more robust crystalline AC-PFBA. This work emphasizes the importance of cocrystallization in generating accessible and functional mechanofluorochromic materials.
Frequently reported mechanofluorochromic compounds are based on boranyls,7,8 tetraphenylethylene compounds,9–11 benzimidazole-like skeletons12,13 and cyanovinylethylene acceptors.14 In addition, gold-containing cyano-based small molecules and other inorganic materials can display these attractive properties.15–20
A typical methodology for developing MFC materials involves the amalgamation of electron-donating and electron-withdrawing functional groups in one molecule via covalent bonds. Such a combination allows for specific modulation of the resulting frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) and causes a red-shift in the photoluminescence (PL) properties.21
The use of bulky and twisted conjugated components also helps to obtain MFC compounds because the grinding process tends to modify the dihedral angles of the moieties with respect to the backbone, thus provoking changes in the π-conjugation and impacting the optical properties of the materials.9 When the structural variations are drastic, they may lead to changes from one solid form to another, whether in a single-crystal to single-crystal (SCSC) transition,22 or from a crystalline to an amorphous material,23 among other possibilities.
Including the mentioned features in a single molecule could be synthetically challenging and potentially lead to low yields, quenched emission, or minimal solubility of the resulting compounds. To overcome the cited limitations, several groups have relied on the principles of crystal engineering and supramolecular chemistry using cocrystallization as the preferred approach to enable modifications of the photoluminescence of solids.24–26 Molecular cocrystals are multicomponent solids composed of neutral, crystalline molecules in specific stoichiometric ratios, termed coformers.27 Its development has enhanced the control of physicochemical properties, for instance solubility, thermal/photo stability and its photophysical properties, owing to the availability of synthetic methods and commercial coformers.28
Interestingly, the research of crystalline MFC materials based on cocrystallization is scarce.29–31 In this context, the hydrogen bond, a directional, strong, non-covalent interaction, has been a pivotal area of study due to the robustness that it can provide to crystalline solids. Notable examples of these compounds are the works of Ito,32 Xie,33 and Dar,34,35 who have successfully developed crystalline materials with high responsiveness and multicolor emission.
The multi-responsiveness of crystalline materials is not limited to the stress-induced stimuli but includes the thermal treatment of crystalline samples that can lead to macroscopic displacements due to the release of molecules, such as carbon dioxide.36 In the context of cocrystals, Gong et al. reported the jumping mechanism of a coronene-TFBQ cocrystal triggered by the expelling of the acceptor molecule in a thermal stimulus.37 More recently, Das et al. reported a salt formed by piperazine-trifluoroacetic acid where the crystals released TFA molecules upon bending.38
Considering the above, we envisioned using a fused carbazole-acridine fragment as the hydrogen bond acceptor due to its straightforward synthesis, thermal robustness, and photoluminescent properties. Complementarily, we draw on perfluorobenzoic and tetrafluoroterephthalic acids to facilitate new crystalline forms and possible responsiveness inspired by previous reports.33,39,40 It is important to note that additional non-classic hydrogen bonds may also enable interesting properties both in the strength and lattice responsiveness of the crystalline packing.5,41
Here, we report the systematic characterization of two hydrogen-bonded cocrystals with 1:
1 (AC-PFBA) or 2
:
1 (AC-TFTA) stoichiometries. The properties of each solid were thoroughly explored and characterized by single crystal and powder X-ray diffraction, fluorescence, UV spectroscopy, and variable temperature solid-state NMR. Remarkably, the heating process of AC-TFTA is translated into jumping of its single crystals, which were successfully correlated with a decarboxylation of the TFTA moiety. Further experiments with this cocrystal revealed its potential application in anticounterfeiting due to the remarkable color change between ground and crystalline phases upon heating and vapor exposure.
The combination of AC and tetrafluoroterephthalic (TFTA) or perfluorobenzoic (PFBA) acids led to the formation of cocrystals AC-TFTA and AC-PFBA as pristine solids, which were obtained from saturated mixtures of dichloromethane/methanol and dichloromethane/hexane, respectively, suitable to be studied using single crystal X-ray diffraction (SC XRD). The collection and solution of the structures allowed us to elucidate a triclinic P space group for AC-TFTA, while a monoclinic system P21/c space group was determined for AC-PFBA. The colors and habits of their structures can be visualized in Fig. 1.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Combination of AC with coformers TFTA or PFBA to form new hydrogen-bonded cocrystals. The resulting single crystals are shown under natural light and under UV light. |
The asymmetric unit of AC-TFTA comprises two molecules of AC and one molecule of TFTA. However, the two molecules of AC and two complete molecules of TFTA are non-equivalent. Due to this feature, one of the TFTA molecules establishes two hydrogen bond interactions, described by a distance (Odonor⋯Nacceptor) of 2.592(1) Å, while the angle ∠NAC⋯H–OTFTA was 168(2)°. Different parameters were observed for the other TFTA molecule, consisting of a 2.609(1) Å distance and an angle of 173(2)°. All these interactions have been represented in Fig. 2a. Regarding AC-PFBA (Fig. 2b), this cocrystal comprises one molecule of both donor and acceptor of hydrogen bonds in the asymmetric unit. The associated parameters for this interaction are composed of a distance of 2.653(3) Å and an ∠NAC⋯H-OPFBA angle of 167(2)°.
The presence of a hydrogen-bond donor in the cocrystals led to interesting crystalline packings and very different photoluminescence (PL) properties compared to the starting emissive material AC, as seen in photographs from Fig. 1. Fresh samples of pristine powders were prepared to assess and compare this property. The experimental diffractograms of these solids were obtained using powder X-ray diffraction and compared against the calculated powder diffractograms from the crystallographic information files to ensure the correct phase was obtained. These are depicted in Fig. S4 (ESI†).
Next, room-temperature fluorescence spectroscopy was employed to characterize the resulting solids’ photoluminescence. The PL spectra of both AC and pristine cocrystals are depicted in Fig. 3a, illustrating an emission maximum at 507 nm for the starting material AC. As for the cocrystals, their PL spectra display two emission maxima at 550 and 563 nm, corresponding to AC-PFBA and AC-TFTA, respectively. Despite the closeness in the emission wavelength of the new solids, the measured photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY, ΦF) are very different. At a λex of 405 nm, the pristine AC showed a ΦF of 74.2%, while the value for AC-PFBA was 26.4% and 15.4% for AC-TFTA.
Moreover, the time-resolved fluorescence decay experiments at room temperature allowed us to determine the lifetimes (τ) of the pristine samples. Firstly, an exponential fit with three fluorescence lifetimes was proposed for the pristine AC as a solvent-free crystalline powder (Fig. 3b). These times were 9.7 ns for τ1, 28.3 ns for τ2, and 48.8 ns for τ3. These values are slightly higher for a small fluorophore in comparison with other solid-state carbazole derivatives;46,47 which could be attributed to the rigidity of the crystal as well as lack of vibrations, owing to the π-conjugated system and strong intermolecular interactions between AC molecules.29 On the other side, the fluorescence lifetimes of the pristine cocrystals were determined through a biexponential fit. For AC-TFTA, the τ1 and τ2 values were 7.1 and 20.3 ns, respectively, whereas for AC-PFBA, these were 8.3 and 21.6.
The reduction in the fluorescence lifetimes and PLQY of the cocrystals compared to AC could be attributed to the vibrational relaxation of the proton at the carboxylic acid, reducing the fluorescence in the cocrystals.48 Another detrimental factor for fluorescence emission is the presence of π-stacking in both cocrystals, depicted in Fig. S5 (ESI†), since associated energy transfer, non-radiative processes can be involved due to orbital overlap between fragments.49 For comparison purposes, the relevant PL data is displayed in Table 1.
Sample | Treatment | λ em (nm) | Φ F (%) | τ n (n = 1,2,3…) (ns) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a λ ex = 405 nm. | ||||||
AC | Pristine | 507 | 74.2 | 9.7 | 28.3 | 48.8 |
AC-TFTA | Pristine | 563 | 15.4 | 7.1 | 20.3 | |
Ground | 656 | 0.6 | 5.6 | 15.1 | 32.5 | |
Fumed | 595 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 15.9 | 31.4 | |
AC-PFBA | Pristine | 550 | 26.4 | 8.3 | 21.6 | |
Ground | 567 | 5.6 | 6.6 | 18.4 | 44.3 | |
Fumed | 553 | 22.5 | 8.9 | 19.8 | 47.9 |
To generate a deeper understanding of the photophysics of the generated solids, UV-Vis spectroscopy experiments using the diffuse reflectance technique were carried out on polycrystalline samples. From the spectra shown in Fig. 3c, a red shift in the absorption bands of the cocrystals is visualized compared to the AC powder. AC displays its maximum at ca. 292 nm, whereas AC-TFTA depicts an absorption maximum at 424 nm, and AC-PFBA does it at 419 nm. Moreover, through the conversion of diffuse reflectance data into Tauc plots, it was determined the optical gaps in the cocrystals, which correspond to the energy of the lowest electronic transition accessible via absorption of a single photon.50 For the case of AC-TFTA, this energy corresponds to 2.32 eV; for AC-PFBA, it is 2.36 eV. The comparative plot can be visualized in Fig. S6 (ESI†).
The S1 of AC is a transition mainly located over the acridine moiety (Fig. 3d) with absorption at 352 nm (3.52 eV), slightly red-shifted to the experimental maximum absorption peak at 292 nm. Upon cocrystallization, the S1 state of the dyad and triads remains with the same local excitation character over the AC molecule. The energy of the S0 → S1 transition is 3.45 eV for AC-PFBA with an oscillator strength of 0.1423, which is very close to the computed values for the AC crystal (Fig. 3e). In the case of the asymmetric triads observed in the AC-TFTA, S1, and S2 are quasi-degenerated, resulting from the in-phase (out-phase) electronic transition dipole moment interaction of the S0 → S1 transition of each AC fragment.55 While S1 (Fig. 3f and g) is the brighter state, whose f is around twice the value computed for AC and AC-PFBA, the S2 of AC-TFTA-a(b) is a dark state with excitation energy of 3.50 eV (3.47 eV). Due to the degree of localization of the orbitals, the energies of the frontier orbitals of the cocrystals are closer to the ones of the pure AC crystal, as can be observed in Fig. S7 (ESI†).
To simulate the photoluminescence properties of the cocrystals, we obtained the optimized geometry for the S1 state using the same ONIOM QM: QM′ embedded scheme described before. The predicted emission energy of the pristine AC crystal is 2.99 eV, which overestimates the experimental maximum (507 nm, 2.45 eV) by around 0.5 eV. The predicted values for AC-PFBA and AC-TFTA are slightly red-shifted (around 0.1 eV) for both crystals, which agrees with the experimental results for both the absorption maxima and the optical gaps. In both cocrystals, the PL originated from the S1min geometry, localized on the AC molecule with almost no influence of the acid. This explains the very close emission of AC-PFBA and AC-TFTA with AC. The generation of orbitals and associated energies are visualized in Fig. S8 (ESI†).
To gather more detailed information on the macroscopic phenomena, we used Hot-Stage microscopy with a heating ramp setup of 100 °C min−1, coupled with a high-speed camera. The resulting cut frames from the original movie (Movie S2, ESI†) display that when the temperature approaches 260 °C, the material starts to lose some crystallinity, as seen from the darkening of the prisms under polarized light. Afterward, a swift collapse of the crystals occurs in a direction towards the center of the prisms along the significant diagonal, as described in the arrows of Fig. 4a.
Surprised by our observations, a fresh sample of pristine AC-TFTA was studied through coupled differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analyses (DSC/TGA). It was observed that the DSC curve highlights an endothermal peak from 245 up to 270 °C, with a maximum of 262 °C (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, the interval of temperatures matches with a 27% loss of mass from the initial sample from the TGA curve, which could be initially associated with the loss of CO2 molecules.
To confirm the identity of the molecules released during the heating process, freshly grown single crystals of AC-TFTA, covered by a thin layer of Parabar 10312 (an oil used for crystallographic purposes), were placed on the Fisher-Johns melting apparatus. Towards 260 °C, it was observed that a large amount of bubbles emanated from the oil, followed by the melting of the remaining material (Fig. 4c). This process was recorded in Movie S3 (ESI†). Subsequently, we relied on the characterization of the volatile compounds through gas chromatography (GC) coupled to mass spectrometry. A sealed vial, with an initial quantity of the pristine AC-TFTA, was loaded and purged with N2, then heated towards 270 °C, and the volatile compounds generated were injected into the GC. The resulting chromatogram is shown in Fig. S10a (ESI†), which displays the resolution of several peaks. The detection of each peak and its associated compound is depicted in the spectrograms of Fig. S10b–h (ESI†). A series of fragmentations of the AC and the TFTA molecules could be identified, especially carbon dioxide and tetrafluorobenzene, due to the decomposition of TFTA. At longer retention times, the presence of acridine, carbazole, and AC molecules was also detected.
After submitting a sample of AC-TFTA under complete decarboxylation, we gathered information on the identity of the remaining solid. The residual yellow powder after the heating process was characterized using PXRD and fluorescence spectroscopy in the solid state. From Fig. S11a (ESI†), the PXRD diffractogram shows a series of broad reflections that barely agree with any of the diffractograms for AC pristine or AC-TFTA. On the other hand, Fig. S11b (ESI†) displays the PL spectra of the compound with an emission maximum of 468 nm for the recovered solid. The DSC/TGA curve of pristine AC is shown in Fig. S12 (ESI†), which displays the melting of the sole compound at 255 °C. The data shows that a new crystalline phase of residual AC is present after the dramatic heating of the cocrystals towards the thermosalient effect and further cooling at room temperature.
Overall, the joint evidence led us to postulate that a decarboxylation of the TFTA coformer inside the crystalline network was responsible for the thermosalient effect, followed closely by the melting of AC. Contrastingly, we did not observe the decarboxylation effect on crystalline TFTA on its own. To corroborate this, crystals of TFTA were studied through DSC/TGA (Fig. S13, ESI†). The curves display the sublimation of TFTA starting from 250 °C up to an endothermal peak at 283 °C.
Similar tests were carried out for the single crystals of AC-PFBA. The heating of freshly grown samples in the melting apparatus did not show the described jumping behavior. A recording of the visual changes under UV light (254 nm) through the heating interval can be recovered from Movie S4 (ESI†). Furthermore, crystals of AC-PFBA were placed, covered with Parabar, and heated up to 260 °C. In Movie S5 (ESI†), a slow release of bubbles was observed, starting at ca. 180 °C and continuing up to 230 °C. More information was obtained through the DSC/TGA curves of pristine AC-PFBA (Fig. S14, ESI†), which show an endothermal peak at 177 °C, in agreement with a mass loss of 37.5%, corresponding to the release of complete PFBA molecules, instead of a decarboxylation process. As the temperature increases, the DSC profile shows a new endotherm at 267 °C, which can be associated with the melting of AC.
The significantly different thermal responses in both samples led us to find a feasible explanation through the analysis of their non-covalent energy interactions for each crystalline packing. For this matter, we performed theoretical calculations using the CE-B3LYP56 6-31G(d,p) functional implemented in CrystalExplorer 21.5.57 The resulting energy values suggest that the hydrogen bond interactions in AC-TFTA (ca. −58 to −61 kJ mol−1) are stronger than in AC-PFBA (ca. −53 kJ mol−1). Both values are in agreement with some reports of the association of carboxylic acids and acridines through hydrogen bonds in the solid state.58–61
Despite this fact, the distribution of weaker non-covalent interactions, such as C–H⋯π, is somewhat different in both cocrystals. For instance, it was observed that the non-covalent interactions around the TFTA molecules in AC-TFTA range from −7 to −9 kJ mol−1. In sharp contrast, inside AC-PFBA, the non-covalent interactions of the PFBA molecules with neighboring molecules are stronger and range between −15 to −29 kJ mol−1 for adjacent PFBA molecules and −32 kJ mol−1 for AC fragments.
The contrasting energy differences between both cocrystals indicate a higher anisotropy in the crystalline packing of AC-TFTA against the more uniform AC-PFBA moiety. As described recently by Geerts and coworkers, the anisotropy derived from different non-covalent interactions can result in dramatic effects in the mechanical and responsive properties of crystals, also providing a methodology for the slow or fast release of organic molecules or gases with thermosalient effects.38 For illustration purposes, Fig. 5a and b highlights the strongest interactions around fluorinated molecules in each cocrystal. To complement the analyses, Hirsfeld surfaces of the fragments are depicted as insets in the corresponding fingerprint plots (Fig. S15 and S16, ESI†), where the principal interactions of these cocrystals are displayed.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 Distribution of non-covalent interaction energies in (a) AC-PFBA and (b) AC-TFTA, obtained from calculations at the CE-B3LYP 6-31G(d,p) level of theory in CrystalExplorer 21.5. |
The characterization of the crystallinity, performed through PXRD at room temperature, showed remarkable differences between both powders. Firstly, the ground powder of AC-TFTA is significantly amorphized compared to ground AC-PFBA under the same conditions, as shown in Fig. S17 (ESI†). A LeBail analysis of the experimental diffractograms helped us determine the percentage of crystalline material remaining after the milling of the solids. While AC-TFTA displayed a 20% of crystalline material remaining, AC-PFBA contained 52% of crystalline powder under the same grinding conditions.
To quantitatively compare the absorption of the new powders due to the grinding, Fig. 6b portrays the UV-Vis profiles of both cocrystals after the grinding process. It can be visualized that AC-TFTA, after grinding, displays a significantly broader band, extended up to ca. 600 nm, with an absorption maximum of 365 nm. On the other hand, the broadening of the absorption in AC-PFBA is not as dramatic as in the previous cocrystal, extended towards 520 nm. Similarly to the pristine solids, the data from diffuse reflectance was employed in calculating the energy optical gaps, through the Tauc plots displayed in Fig. S18 (ESI†). The obtained values were considerably lower than those for pristine solids, being 2.02 eV for AC-TFTA against 2.22 eV for AC-PFBA.
Regarding the PL of the ground solids, the spectra are shown in Fig. 6c. It highlights an emission maximum of 656 nm for AC-TFTA, while for AC-PFBA, it is 567 nm. In comparison with the pristine samples, AC-TFTA showed a bathochromic shift of 93 nm, and AC-PFBA only showed a 17 nm red-shift. The ground samples showed a dramatic quenching in the fluorescence; in the case of AC-TFTA, the PLQY went from 15.4% to 0.6%, and for AC-PFBA, the value changed from 26.4% to 5.6%. The smaller values of quantum yields agree well with a higher contribution of amorphous solid component, with a rise in the degree of freedom of the molecules, promoting more effective vibrational relaxations.62 Additionally, the time-resolved fluorescence decay profiles were determined for these samples (Fig. 6d). The concentrated data is displayed in Table 1, which shows that for both AC-TFTA and AC-PFBA, the decay was fitted as a three-component exponential.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 Characterization of pristine and ground powders of cocrystals through ssNMR. 13C MAS spectra with cross-polarization (125.8 MHz, Spin Rate = 20 kHz, d1 = 20 s) of (a) AC-TFTA, and (b) AC-PFBA19F MAS spectra (470.6 MHz, Spin Rate = 20 kHz, d1 = 10 s) of (c) AC-TFTA, and (d) AC-PFBA. In these spectra, only the central signals are shown. For the full spectra, please visualize the ESI† file. |
Even more interestingly, significant changes are observed in the ssNMR 19F MAS spectra of both cocrystals. The comparison of ground and pristine AC-TFTA at room temperature is shown in Fig. 7c. A set of signals between −130 and −145 ppm correspond to the fluorine atoms of the TFTA when the periodic arrangement is intact. On the other hand, upon amorphization of the sample, the resolution of the signals is notoriously diminished, resulting in the coalescence into a broadened signal centered at −143 ppm. Additional experiments at variable temperatures (Fig. S19, ESI†) were conducted to evaluate possible changes in the chemical shift of the signals. However, no noticeable effects were observed through the temperature interval between 248 and 308 K. For the case of AC-PFBA, even after the thorough grinding process, the 19F spectra associated with both pristine and ground solids remain essentially unaltered both at room (Fig. 7d) and low temperatures (248 K), as can be seen from Fig. S20 (ESI†).
The color changes were recorded and can be visualized in Movie S6 (ESI†). The vapor-treated powders were characterized through PXRD to examine the degree of crystallinity after the whole process. The resulting data, presented in Fig. 8a and b, allowed us to visualize the regeneration of the crystalline solid with good agreement between the reflections of the experimental diffractogram and the calculated from SC XRD structures. Moreover, the photophysical parameters for these solids were determined. The Fig. S21 (ESI†) displays the solid-state fluorescence spectra of the fumed solids, depicting a λem of 595 nm for AC-TFTA, different from the 563 nm determined for the pristine sample. Meanwhile, for AC-PFBA, the maximum appears at 553 nm, which is extremely close to the initial 550 nm of the pristine sample.
Furthermore, the quantum yields of the fumed samples were measured. It was clear that for AC-TFTA, not only was the emission maximum drastically changed, but it also suffered a quenching in the emission of the powder with a 2.1% yield. The determined fluorescence lifetimes of this fumed sample were 6.1, 15.9, and 31.4 ns, which closely resemble the lifetimes of the ground powder. Contrastingly, the fumed powder of AC-PFBA showed a remarkable 22.5% yield against the 26.4% of the pristine sample, while the fitted fluorescence lifetimes were determined to be 8.9, 19.8, and 47.9 ns. The decay curves are shown in Fig. 8c.
Due to the contrasting results in the recovery, we decided to perform fatigue tests on powdered samples of both cocrystals. For this purpose, three grinding-recovery (fuming) cycles were carried out. Fluorescence spectroscopy was employed to monitor the regeneration of the crystalline phase. The reduced spectral data is displayed in Fig. 8d, and the progressive solid-state spectra are depicted in Fig. S22 and S23 (ESI†). From the fuming of AC-TFTA in the first cycle, this powder showed clear signs of fatigue, as seen in the ever-smaller differences between the emission wavelength of the ground and the fumed sample. By the end of the third cycle, the difference between emission maxima was only 21 nm (from 600 to 579 nm), in contrast to the first grinding-fuming with a difference of 61 nm. On the other side, AC-PFBA showed remarkable recovery properties under fuming since the most significant difference between the ground and the fumed samples was only 21 nm and occurred during the second cycle.
Afterward, we tested the thermal-induced regenerating capabilities of the ground powders. First, we decided to gather information on the thermal stability and behavior of ground powders. The resulting calorimetric and thermogravimetric analysis can be visualized in Fig. 9a. AC-TFTA, in its ground form, showed notable changes in the DSC curve in comparison with the pristine solid. From 78 °C and up to 245 °C, the DSC displays a progressive, increasing heat flow, which can be associated with the gradual migration of the amorphous solid to regenerate the crystalline arrangement. Afterward, an exotherm at 252 °C, which is aligned with a mass loss of 22% (from the TGA curve), could be related to the progressive decomposition of TFTA, expelling CO2. Finally, an endothermal peak towards 267 °C features the melting of AC coformer.
A similar case is exposed for AC-PFBA ground, which displays a slow but continuous heat entry until an endotherm at 166 °C is evident, in agreement with the expulsion of PFBA and a 35% loss of starting mass. Afterward, at ca. 266 °C, as happened in AC-TFTA, an endotherm is presented, which could also be associated with the melting of AC.
To obtain visual evidence of the recovery of crystallinity under thermal stimuli, amounts of both ground cocrystals were placed on a glass holder and put on a hot plate at 80 °C for 10 minutes. The transition was recorded in Movie S7 (ESI†), and the characterization of the thermal-treated powders was carried out through PXRD. The diffractograms are exposed in Fig. 9b and c, with insets of the appearance of the resulting solids after the thermal treatment. Despite the recovery of some of the initial crystallinity, especially in AC-TFTA, it is notorious that the crystalline phase is not fully recovered under the conditions employed, with the presence of a higher amorphous component in comparison with the PXRD obtained for the fuming procedure.
The regeneration of the crystalline phases due to external stimuli is an ongoing field of study. So far, the evidence collected not only in this manuscript but also in previous works suggests that the presence of highly twisted, rigid fragments plays a role in the change in the photophysical properties during the grinding process, overall, changing the dihedral angles between fragments, modifying the π-conjugation across the system, with a subsequent change in the absorption of the material, as visualized from Fig. 6.9,46,63 A synergistic effect between the amorphization of the crystalline structure and the torsional changes of molecules give rise to a metastable phase. This phase, overall, in an amorphous state, should contain seeds of remaining microcrystals capable of inducing the regeneration of the crystalline solid when the external stimuli are applied. The degree of regeneration of these materials can vary with the anisotropy of the crystalline packing.33 If the distribution of the non-covalent interaction energies around the molecules is similar, as in the case of AC-PFBA herein presented, the recovery of the material should occur with a high probability. On the contrary, if some energies are remarkably different from the rest, as in AC-TFTA, the regeneration of the crystalline phase will rely primarily on the recovery of these non-covalent interactions, with a lower probability of recovery and a high tendency towards fatigue.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthetic and experimental procedures, spectroscopic data (NMR, FTIR, HRMS), VT ssNMR spectra, final crystallographic refinement parameters, PXRD diffractograms, Hirshfeld surface maps, DFT computational details and ESR spectra. CCDC 2351862–2351865. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qm00421c |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2024 |