Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

A direct oxidative esterification of aldehydes with alcohols mediated by photochemical C–H bromination

Haru Ando a, Sakura Kodaki a, Hiroyoshi Takamura a, Isao Kadota *a and Kenta Tanaka *b
aDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushima-Naka, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan. E-mail: kadota-i@okayama-u.ac.jp
bResearch Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushima-Naka, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan. E-mail: ktanaka@okayama-u.ac.jp

Received 27th July 2024 , Accepted 29th August 2024

First published on 30th August 2024


Abstract

The photochemical direct esterification of aldehydes with alcohols via in situ-generated acyl-bromides presented in this report is an attractive complementary addition to hitherto reported methods, as these are usually carried out in a two-step, one-pot procedure in order to avoid side reactions such as the oxidation of alcohols by halogen sources.


Esterification is a practical method in organic chemistry for the synthesis of various bioactive compounds and functional materials. Over the past decades, the esterification of carboxylic acids with alcohols has typically been performed using various condensation reagents.1 Alternatively, the direct oxidative esterification of aldehydes with alcohols has emerged as a complementary method. The classical oxidative esterification of aldehydes proceeds via the oxidation of a hemiacetal intermediate using stoichiometric oxidants (Scheme 1(a)).2 Although these reactions are useful to synthesize esters, the development of a more efficient approach for the esterification of aldehydes with alcohols would be highly desirable in the pursuit of sustainable organic synthesis.
image file: d4ob01237b-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Examples of oxidative esterifications of aldehydes with alcohols.

Oxidative esterifications via acyl halides represent a highly useful method in organic chemistry to generate functionalized esters (Scheme 1(b)). Recently, Kim and coworkers have reported an oxidative esterification with dibromoisocyanuric acid (DBI) via acyl bromides.3 Furthermore, photochemical esterifications with halogen sources such as N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) or N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) have also been developed.4 Despite these advances, these reactions are usually carried out in a two-step, one-pot procedure in order to avoid side reactions such as the oxidation of alcohols by halogen sources.5 Thus, the development of more efficient methods, such as direct esterifications, still remains desirable.

Our group has developed various visible-light-induced photochemical reactions.6 During our investigations, we have discovered an unexpected photochemical esterification of an aldehyde with an alcohol, which prompted us to investigate the direct photochemical esterification of aldehydes. Here, we report the esterification of aldehydes with alcohols mediated by a photochemical C–H bromination.

We initially investigated the optimization of the reaction conditions for the photochemical esterification of benzaldehyde (1a) with 1-butanol (2a) (Table 1). When the reaction was carried out under irradiation from blue LEDs (λex = 425 nm), the desired ester (3a) was obtained in low yield (Table 1, entry 1). In contrast, under irradiation from purple LEDs (λex = 380 nm), the product yield was increased to 75% (Table 1, entry 2), suggesting that the Br–C bond of BrCCl3 is efficiently cleaved under these conditions. Ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) can also be used for this reaction (Table 1, entry 3). Typical solvents such as toluene, CH3CN, and hexane furnished the product in low to moderate yields (Table 1, entries 4–6). Although CBr4 can be used instead of BrCCl3, CCl4 is not suitable, suggesting that the presence of a bromo group is important for the reaction to proceed (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). Reducing the amount of BrCCl3 used resulted in a lower product yield (Table 1, entry 9). When the reaction was carried out for 36 h in the presence of MS3 Å, the desired product was obtained in high yield due to the reduced formation of benzoic acid (Table 1, entry 10). Control experiments, wherein BrCCl3 or the light source were omitted, did not proceed, and it can therefore be concluded that both elements are crucial for the reaction to proceed (Table 1, entries 11 and 12).

Table 1 Photochemical esterification of benzaldehyde with 1-butanola

image file: d4ob01237b-u1.tif

Entry Light source (nm) Solvent Yield (%)
a All reactions were carried out using benzaldehyde (1a; 0.2 mmol), 1-butanol (2a; 0.26 mmol), and BrCCl3 (0.6 mmol) in the specified solvent (2.0 mL) at room temperature under an argon atmosphere and photoirradiation. b CBr4 was used instead of BrCCl3. c CCl4 was used instead of BrCCl3. d BrCCl3 (1.0 equiv.) was used. e MS3A (50 mg) was added to the reaction at 36 h. f Without BrCCl3.
1 425 CH2Cl2 10
2 380 CH2Cl2 75
3 365 CH2Cl2 74
4 380 Toluene 18
5 380 CH3CN 15
6 380 Hexane 66
7b 380 CH2Cl2 64
8c 380 CH2Cl2 Trace
9d 380 CH2Cl2 40
10e 380 CH2Cl2 86
11f 380 CH2Cl2 0
12 CH2Cl2 Trace


With the optimal conditions in hand, we subsequently screened the photochemical esterification using various alcohols and aldehydes (Table 2). Both electron-rich and -deficient aromatic systems are compatible with the applied reaction conditions (3b–g), and heteroaromatic aldehydes (1h–1i) are also tolerated. Cinnamaldehyde (1j) is a good substrate for this reaction. Furthermore, aliphatic aldehydes (1k–1o) are well tolerated, in particular those with more sterically congested groups, such as an adamantyl group (1o), which furnished the desired ester (3o) in excellent yield. Although aliphatic aldehydes have higher acyl-C–H bond dissociation energies relative to arylaldehydes, these reactions smoothly proceed to give the corresponding esters in good yields.7 Moreover, the reaction could be applied to multi-substituted aldehydes to give the corresponding esters (3p–3r) in moderate yields. Since these multi-substituted esters are found in functional materials,8 the present reaction constitutes a promising tool for the synthesis of these useful compounds. Notably, the current reaction allows for the synthesis of trisubstituted esters such as 3r,9 for which there are so far only a few examples.10 A variety of aliphatic alcohols, including primary and secondary alcohols, furnished the desired esters (3a–3y) in moderate to high yields. While direct esterification reactions mediated by other halogen sources such as NBS are difficult due to side reactions between the halogen sources and the alcohols,3–5 the present reaction with BrCCl3 can be effectively applied to alcohols 1a–1y. In fact, when the reactions of 1t or 1x were carried out with NBS, the desired products were not obtained.11

Table 2 Scope of the photochemical esterification of aldehydes with alcoholsa
a All reactions were carried out using aldehyde (1; 0.2 mmol), alcohol (2; 0.26 mmol), BrCCl3 (0.6 mmol), and MS3 Å (50 mg) in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) at room temperature under an argon atmosphere and irradiation from purple LEDs (λex = 380 nm). b CBr4 was used under irradiation with ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) for 72 h. c NaHCO3 (1.4 mmol) was added to the reaction. d Alcohol (2; 1.2 mmol) and CBr4 (1.2 mmol) were used under irradiation with ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) for 72 h. e Alcohol (2; 1.8 mmol) and CBr4 (1.8 mmol) were used under irradiation with ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) for 72 h. f Alcohol (2; 0.52 mmol) was used.
image file: d4ob01237b-u2.tif


To examine the reaction mechanism, we used a radical scavenger in the reaction (Scheme 2). When the reaction was performed with TEMPO, the product yield decreased effectively. In addition, an acyl radical was trapped by TEMPO and detected as 4a using mass spectrometry. Thus, the reaction may produce an acyl radical via a radical reaction.


image file: d4ob01237b-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Mechanistic study of the photochemical esterification. The reaction was carried out using benzaldehyde (1a; 0.2 mmol), 1-butanol (2a; 0.26 mmol), BrCCl3 (0.6 mmol), TEMPO (0.6 mmol), and MS3 Å (50 mg) in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) at room temperature under an argon atmosphere and irradiation from purple LEDs (λex = 380 nm).

A feasible reaction mechanism is proposed in Scheme 3. Homolytic cleavage of BrCCl3 under irradiation from purple LEDs affords a trichloromethyl radical and a bromo radical.12 The bromo group is important for the reaction to proceed, as evident from the result obtained when using CCl4 (Table 1, entry 8). According to Scheme 2, the trichloromethyl radical can dissociate the C–H bond of benzaldehyde to form acyl radical A, which reacts with BrCCl3 to form acyl bromide B.3,4,13 This hypothesis is supported by the detection of benzoyl bromide using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.14 Finally, the alcohol can react with acyl bromide B to furnish the desired ester.


image file: d4ob01237b-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Proposed reaction mechanism.

Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a direct photochemical esterification of aldehydes with alcohols under irradiation from purple LEDs. A variety of alcohols that are difficult to use in hitherto reported two-step, one-pot methods using halogen sources such as NBS are also suitable for this reaction. Various aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes are selectively activated by BrCCl3 and thus suitable for this reaction. Notably, the reaction can be applied to multi-substituted aldehydes, resulting in the corresponding esters, which are found in functional materials. According to a mechanistic study using TEMPO, an acyl-radical intermediate is generated during the reaction. The present reaction provides access to a variety of functionalized esters and therefore constitutes a promising tool for the synthesis of bioactive compounds and functional materials.

Data availability

The data underlying this study are available in this article and its ESI.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Kenta Tanaka, upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the JGC-Saneyoshi Scholarship Foundation, the TOSOH Award in Synthetic Organic Chemistry, Japan, and the Wesco Scientific Promotion Foundation. We appreciate the assistance of the Division of Instrumental Analysis at Okayama University with NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry.

References

  1. J. Otera and J. Nishikido, Esterification: Methods, Reactions, and Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2nd edn, 2010 Search PubMed.
  2. (a) K. Ekoue-Kovim and C. Wolf, Chem. – Eur. J., 2008, 14, 6302–6315 CrossRef PubMed; (b) S. Gaspa, A. Porcheddu and L. D. Luca, Tetrahedron Lett., 2016, 57, 3433–3440 CrossRef CAS; (c) N. Mori and N. Togo, Tetrahedron, 2005, 61, 5915–5925 CrossRef CAS; (d) B. R. Travis, M. Sivakumar, G. O. Hollist and B. Borhan, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 1031–1034 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) E. E. Finney, K. A. Ogawa and A. J. Boydston, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 12374–12377 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) D. Smeyne, K. Verboom, M. Bryan, J. LoBue and A. Shaikh, Tetrahedron Lett., 2021, 68, 152898 CrossRef CAS.
  3. (a) Y.-D. Kwon, M. T. La and H.-K. Kim, New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 10833–10841 RSC; (b) S. Gaspa, A. Porcheddu and S. D. Luca, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 3666–3669 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. (a) Y. Cheung, Tetrahedron Lett., 1979, 40, 3809–3810 CrossRef; (b) N. F. Nikitas, M. K. Apostopoulou, E. Skolia, A. Tsoukaki and C. G. Kokotos, Chem. – Eur. J., 2021, 27, 7915–7922 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) N. Iqbal and E. J. Cho, J. Org. Chem., 2016, 81, 1905–1911 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) A. J. A. Dias, A. Muranaka, M. Uchiyama, K. Tanaka and Y. Nagashima, Commun. Chem., 2024, 7, 126 CrossRef PubMed.
  5. (a) N. Venkatasubramanian and V. Thiagarajan, Can. J. Chem., 1969, 47, 694–697 CrossRef CAS; (b) N. Azizi, M. Khajeh and M. Alipour, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 15561–15565 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. Qiang, T.-C. Chan and Y.-Y. Yueng, Asian J. Org. Chem., 2024, 13, e202300564 CrossRef CAS.
  6. (a) H. Ando, H. Takamura, I. Kadota and K. Tanaka, Chem. Commun., 2024, 60, 4765–4768 RSC; (b) S. Nohara, S. Iwai, N. Yamaguchi, Y. Asada, Y. Kamiyama, Y. Tanaka, K. Tanaka and Y. Hoshino, Synlett, 2023, 2525–2529 CAS; (c) K. Tanaka, M. Kishimoto, Y. Tanaka, Y. Kamiyama, Y. Asada, M. Sukekawa, N. Ohtsuka, T. Suzuki, N. Momiyama, K. Honda and Y. Hoshino, J. Org. Chem., 2022, 87, 3319–3328 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) K. Tanaka, Y. Asada and Y. Hoshino, Chem. Commun., 2022, 58, 2476–2479 RSC; (e) K. Tanaka, Y. Iwama, K. Mami, N. Ohtsuka, Y. Hoshino and K. Honda, Org. Lett., 2020, 22, 5207–5211 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) K. Tanaka, Y. Asada, Y. Hoshino and K. Honda, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2020, 18, 8074–8078 RSC.
  7. E. T. Denisov and V. E. Tumanov, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2005, 74, 825–858 CrossRef CAS.
  8. (a) J. Dolai, H. Ali and N. R. Jana, ACS Appl. Polym. Mater., 2020, 2, 691–698 CrossRef CAS; (b) K. Kawahara, R. Suzuki and M. Tokita, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 2023, 224, 2300032 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. Zhao, J. Zhang, X. Wang, L. Wang, J. Wang and C. Pang, ACS Appl. Polym. Mater., 2023, 5, 2408–2416 CrossRef CAS; (d) R. Ishige, N. Ohta, H. Ogawa, M. Tokita and A. Takahara, Macromolecules, 2016, 49, 6061–6074 CrossRef CAS; (e) M. Leloire, C. Walshe, P. Devaux, R. Giovine, S. Duval, T. Bousquet, S. Chibani, F. Paul, J.-A. Moissette, H. Vezin, P. Nerisson, L. Cantrel, C. Volkringer and T. Loiseau, Chem. – Eur. J., 2022, 28, e202104437 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. (a) A. Pegoli, X. She, D. Wifling, H. Hubner, G. Bernhardt, P. Gmeiner and M. Keller, J. Med. Chem., 2017, 60, 3314–3334 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) H.-F. Jiang, Y.-X. Shen and W. Zhao-Yang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 7542–7545 CrossRef CAS; (c) J.-T. Fan, X.-H. Fan, C.-Y. Gao, J. Wei and L.-M. Yang, Org. Chem. Front., 2022, 9, 2357–2367 RSC; (d) R. V. Jagadeesh, H. Junge, M.-M. Pohl, J. Radnik, A. Brückner and M. Beller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 10776–10782 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. The trisubstituted esters are found in several materials. See: (a) Y. Fu, K. Li, M. Batmunkh, H. Yu, S. Donne, B. Jia and T. Ma, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 44830–44839 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. Aijaz, J.-K. Sun, P. Pachfule, T. Uchida and Q. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 13945–13948 RSC; (c) O. Plietzsch, S. Alexandra, A. Hafner, J. Huuskonen, K. Rissanen, M. Nieger, T. Muller and S. Bräse, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 283–299 CrossRef CAS.
  11. See the ESI:.
  12. (a) Y.-B. Wang, F. Chen, M. Li, Q. Bu, Z. Du, J. Liu, B. Dai and N. Liu, Green Chem., 2023, 25, 1191–1200 RSC; (b) X. Li, J. Fan, D. Cui, H. Yan, S. Shan, Y. Lu, X. Cheng and T.-P. Loh, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2022, e202200340 CrossRef CAS.
  13. C. S. Colley, D. C. Grills, N. A. Besley, S. Jockusch, P. Matousek, A. W. Parker, M. Towrie, N. J. Turro, P. M. W. Gill and M. W. George, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 14952–14958 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. S. Kang, M. Thanh and H. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett., 2018, 59, 3541–3546 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ob01237b

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.