Haru
Ando
a,
Sakura
Kodaki
a,
Hiroyoshi
Takamura
a,
Isao
Kadota
*a and
Kenta
Tanaka
*b
aDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushima-Naka, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan. E-mail: kadota-i@okayama-u.ac.jp
bResearch Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushima-Naka, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan. E-mail: ktanaka@okayama-u.ac.jp
First published on 30th August 2024
The photochemical direct esterification of aldehydes with alcohols via in situ-generated acyl-bromides presented in this report is an attractive complementary addition to hitherto reported methods, as these are usually carried out in a two-step, one-pot procedure in order to avoid side reactions such as the oxidation of alcohols by halogen sources.
Oxidative esterifications via acyl halides represent a highly useful method in organic chemistry to generate functionalized esters (Scheme 1(b)). Recently, Kim and coworkers have reported an oxidative esterification with dibromoisocyanuric acid (DBI) via acyl bromides.3 Furthermore, photochemical esterifications with halogen sources such as N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) or N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) have also been developed.4 Despite these advances, these reactions are usually carried out in a two-step, one-pot procedure in order to avoid side reactions such as the oxidation of alcohols by halogen sources.5 Thus, the development of more efficient methods, such as direct esterifications, still remains desirable.
Our group has developed various visible-light-induced photochemical reactions.6 During our investigations, we have discovered an unexpected photochemical esterification of an aldehyde with an alcohol, which prompted us to investigate the direct photochemical esterification of aldehydes. Here, we report the esterification of aldehydes with alcohols mediated by a photochemical C–H bromination.
We initially investigated the optimization of the reaction conditions for the photochemical esterification of benzaldehyde (1a) with 1-butanol (2a) (Table 1). When the reaction was carried out under irradiation from blue LEDs (λex = 425 nm), the desired ester (3a) was obtained in low yield (Table 1, entry 1). In contrast, under irradiation from purple LEDs (λex = 380 nm), the product yield was increased to 75% (Table 1, entry 2), suggesting that the Br–C bond of BrCCl3 is efficiently cleaved under these conditions. Ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) can also be used for this reaction (Table 1, entry 3). Typical solvents such as toluene, CH3CN, and hexane furnished the product in low to moderate yields (Table 1, entries 4–6). Although CBr4 can be used instead of BrCCl3, CCl4 is not suitable, suggesting that the presence of a bromo group is important for the reaction to proceed (Table 1, entries 7 and 8). Reducing the amount of BrCCl3 used resulted in a lower product yield (Table 1, entry 9). When the reaction was carried out for 36 h in the presence of MS3 Å, the desired product was obtained in high yield due to the reduced formation of benzoic acid (Table 1, entry 10). Control experiments, wherein BrCCl3 or the light source were omitted, did not proceed, and it can therefore be concluded that both elements are crucial for the reaction to proceed (Table 1, entries 11 and 12).
Entry | Light source (nm) | Solvent | Yield (%) |
---|---|---|---|
a All reactions were carried out using benzaldehyde (1a; 0.2 mmol), 1-butanol (2a; 0.26 mmol), and BrCCl3 (0.6 mmol) in the specified solvent (2.0 mL) at room temperature under an argon atmosphere and photoirradiation. b CBr4 was used instead of BrCCl3. c CCl4 was used instead of BrCCl3. d BrCCl3 (1.0 equiv.) was used. e MS3A (50 mg) was added to the reaction at 36 h. f Without BrCCl3. | |||
1 | 425 | CH2Cl2 | 10 |
2 | 380 | CH2Cl2 | 75 |
3 | 365 | CH2Cl2 | 74 |
4 | 380 | Toluene | 18 |
5 | 380 | CH3CN | 15 |
6 | 380 | Hexane | 66 |
7b | 380 | CH2Cl2 | 64 |
8c | 380 | CH2Cl2 | Trace |
9d | 380 | CH2Cl2 | 40 |
10e | 380 | CH2Cl2 | 86 |
11f | 380 | CH2Cl2 | 0 |
12 | — | CH2Cl2 | Trace |
With the optimal conditions in hand, we subsequently screened the photochemical esterification using various alcohols and aldehydes (Table 2). Both electron-rich and -deficient aromatic systems are compatible with the applied reaction conditions (3b–g), and heteroaromatic aldehydes (1h–1i) are also tolerated. Cinnamaldehyde (1j) is a good substrate for this reaction. Furthermore, aliphatic aldehydes (1k–1o) are well tolerated, in particular those with more sterically congested groups, such as an adamantyl group (1o), which furnished the desired ester (3o) in excellent yield. Although aliphatic aldehydes have higher acyl-C–H bond dissociation energies relative to arylaldehydes, these reactions smoothly proceed to give the corresponding esters in good yields.7 Moreover, the reaction could be applied to multi-substituted aldehydes to give the corresponding esters (3p–3r) in moderate yields. Since these multi-substituted esters are found in functional materials,8 the present reaction constitutes a promising tool for the synthesis of these useful compounds. Notably, the current reaction allows for the synthesis of trisubstituted esters such as 3r,9 for which there are so far only a few examples.10 A variety of aliphatic alcohols, including primary and secondary alcohols, furnished the desired esters (3a–3y) in moderate to high yields. While direct esterification reactions mediated by other halogen sources such as NBS are difficult due to side reactions between the halogen sources and the alcohols,3–5 the present reaction with BrCCl3 can be effectively applied to alcohols 1a–1y. In fact, when the reactions of 1t or 1x were carried out with NBS, the desired products were not obtained.11
a All reactions were carried out using aldehyde (1; 0.2 mmol), alcohol (2; 0.26 mmol), BrCCl3 (0.6 mmol), and MS3 Å (50 mg) in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) at room temperature under an argon atmosphere and irradiation from purple LEDs (λex = 380 nm). b CBr4 was used under irradiation with ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) for 72 h. c NaHCO3 (1.4 mmol) was added to the reaction. d Alcohol (2; 1.2 mmol) and CBr4 (1.2 mmol) were used under irradiation with ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) for 72 h. e Alcohol (2; 1.8 mmol) and CBr4 (1.8 mmol) were used under irradiation with ultraviolet light (λex = 365 nm) for 72 h. f Alcohol (2; 0.52 mmol) was used. |
---|
![]() |
To examine the reaction mechanism, we used a radical scavenger in the reaction (Scheme 2). When the reaction was performed with TEMPO, the product yield decreased effectively. In addition, an acyl radical was trapped by TEMPO and detected as 4a using mass spectrometry. Thus, the reaction may produce an acyl radical via a radical reaction.
A feasible reaction mechanism is proposed in Scheme 3. Homolytic cleavage of BrCCl3 under irradiation from purple LEDs affords a trichloromethyl radical and a bromo radical.12 The bromo group is important for the reaction to proceed, as evident from the result obtained when using CCl4 (Table 1, entry 8). According to Scheme 2, the trichloromethyl radical can dissociate the C–H bond of benzaldehyde to form acyl radical A, which reacts with BrCCl3 to form acyl bromide B.3,4,13 This hypothesis is supported by the detection of benzoyl bromide using 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.14 Finally, the alcohol can react with acyl bromide B to furnish the desired ester.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Kenta Tanaka, upon reasonable request.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ob01237b |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |