Open Access Article
Siyi
Ma
ab,
Fang
Dong
ac,
Weiliang
Han
a,
Weigao
Han
a and
Zhicheng
Tang
*a
aNational Engineering Research Center for Fine Petrochemical Intermediates, and State Key Laboratory for Oxo Synthesis and Selective Oxidation, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China. E-mail: tangzhicheng@licp.cas.cn; Tel: +86 931 4968083
bUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
cDalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, 116023, China
First published on 9th October 2023
Pt nanoclusters are a promising catalyst for VOC catalytic combustion, but they have been rarely studied so far. Herein, Pt nanoclusters (Pt NCs) and Pt nanoparticles (Pt NPs) were constructed by an in situ confined-domain encapsulation strategy, and then the reaction mechanism of Pt species on the catalytic combustion of VOCs was studied systematically. Interestingly, the addition process of Pt and Ce components greatly affected the dispersion and surface states of Pt species. The catalytic performance over PtNC@CeO2 (0.01 wt% Pt loadings) was proved to be of outstanding activity and stability, and the reason was related to the contribution of Pt nanoclusters and more lattice oxygen and Ce3+ species, whose formation was inextricably linked to the strong interfacial effect between Pt and CeO2. Notably, the in situ introduction approach of Pt species can effectively build up the point defects on the surface of CeO2 to promote the dispersion and anchoring of Pt species. In situ DRIFT spectroscopy verified that the role of lattice oxygen was significant in accelerating the catalytic oxidation of VOCs, and the oxidation process of toluene followed the reaction path: toluene → benzyl alcohol → benzaldehyde → benzoic acid → phenol → maleic anhydride → carbon dioxide and water. Meanwhile, the rate-determining step in the oxidation of toluene may be the further decomposition of alcohol or carboxylic acid intermediates.
Compared with non-precious metal catalysts, precious metal catalysts9–12 are selected to promote the catalytic oxidation efficiency of VOCs by virtue of their high catalytic activity, strong anti-inactivation ability, and low reaction temperature. Among the noble metal catalysts, platinum-based catalysts have better catalytic effects for hydrocarbon and aromatic hydrocarbon VOCs.13–15 Naturally, the key to preparing highly active platinum-based catalysts is to improve the active centers, which requires the assistance of a carrier. The typical active carrier cerium dioxide (CeO2), with its unique characteristic of defect-prone structure and interconversion between different valence states of cerium,16 can act extensively in VOC catalytic combustion especially after the addition of the noble metal platinum (Pt).17,18 More importantly, this type of carrier has strong interactions with precious metal nanoparticles.19,20 Moreover, strong metal–support interactions (SMSIs), generally formed by chemical bonding and associated charge transfer in the active interface region, can significantly improve the catalytic performance of Pt/CeO2 catalysts. Undoubtedly, Pt/CeO2 catalysts stand out among the many catalysts used for VOC catalytic combustion.
However, in typical supported Pt/CeO2 catalysts, noble metal nanoparticles have an uneven size distribution that is not uniform enough to maximize the utilization of their active sites, and the catalysts are prone to agglomeration after a long reaction time and even high-temperature reactions, resulting in catalyst deactivation. These deficiencies have hindered the wide application of Pt/CeO2 catalysts to some extent.21 Therefore, in recent years, there has been a surge of research to improve the dispersion of Pt species (construction of nanoclusters or even atomic-level Pt)22,23 and study the connection between the distribution of the Pt species and catalytic activity.24 Nevertheless, the impact of Pt nanoclusters (Pt NCs) on the efficiency of VOC catalysis has not received much attention. Compared to ordinary metal nanoparticles (M NPs), metal nanoclusters (M NCs) are particularly suited for the field of catalysis because they have a distinct coordination environment, a smaller size, a greater specific surface area and a well-defined atomic structure.25,26 For example, Mostafa et al.27 studied the oxidation of 2-propanol by different shapes of Pt NCs with different reaction efficiencies. Xue et al.28 explored the combustion mechanism of methane with the help of Pt NCs. Likewise, M NCs, as transitions between nanoparticles and atoms, exhibit a more stable electronic energy band structure than single atoms29 and have more abundant catalytically active exposure sites than nanoparticles (NPs), which can significantly increase catalytic efficiency.30,31 Therefore, it is important to expose additional active sites by shrinking Pt species to nanoclusters, thus effectively boosting the catalytic performance. Commonly, the methods of catalyst synthesis also significantly affect their catalytic performance.32,33 For instance, Lai et al.34 enhanced hydrogen precipitation catalysis by modulating the electronic structure of Pt nanoclusters. In addition, SMSI is also a factor that cannot be neglected in the catalyst preparation process. To our knowledge, nonetheless, there have not been any studies on surface defect engineering on CeO2 to control the particle size of Pt species and their use in catalytic oxidation of VOCs.
Herein, Pt NCs and Pt NPs were constructed by an in situ confined-domain encapsulation strategy, and the reaction mechanism of the action of Pt species was systematically investigated. In order to carefully optimize Pt–CeO2 catalysts, the effects of Pt and Ce species on the catalytic performance of Pt–CeO2 catalysts were examined in this article. Scheme 1 shows the preparation process of each catalyst. Among them, adding sodium borohydride (NaBH4) in situ to generate more Ce3+ species was beneficial to promote the catalytic performance.35 With the aid of many characterization methods, the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst prepared by an in situ confined strategy demonstrated good catalytic performance. With more lattice oxygen and Ce3+ species over the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst, an abundance of oxygen vacancies could be generated, thus effectively regulating the electronic structure. The formation of the interfacial effect between Pt and Ce by PtNC@CeO2 was important, which caused changes in the surrounding coordination environment and also favored the anchoring of Pt nanoclusters. It was proved that the size and distribution of Pt species were impacted by the manner of the Pt and Ce introduction. In conclusion, we studied the toluene catalytic mechanism over PtNC@CeO2 employing an in situ confined-domain encapsulation strategy to achieve the precise construction of noble metal catalysts, which showed a remarkable low-temperature activity as well as low Pt loading and good stability. As a result, this work provides Pt nanocluster catalysts with high catalytic activity, which would inspire researchers to pursue in situ confined methods to improve the catalytic activity of nanoclusters and offer some implications for the precise construction of highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles.
:
1.0) were dissolved. After cooling, solution A was created by adding 0.037 mL H2PtCl6 (19.3 mmol L−1). 38.4 g of NaOH (6 mol L−1) was diluted in 140 mL deionized water to form solution B, and then solution B was combined with solution A to create solution C. Drops of dissolved NaBH4 (0.05 g) in deionized water were then added to solution C. After vigorous stirring for 30 min at ambient temperature, solution C was then added to a hydrothermal reactor (100 °C, 24 h). The resulting precipitate (PtNP@Ce(OH)3) was washed with distilled water before being vacuum-dried overnight at 80 °C and calcined in air for 4 h at 400 °C. The prepared sample was labeled as PtNP@CeO2. On this basis, a catalyst without NaBH4 incorporation was also synthesized, which is documented in the ESI.†
:
1.0) and a certain amount of H2PtCl6 (0.037 mL) were mixed with distilled water at 90 °C. After cooling, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (3.472 g) was added to the chloroplatinic acid solution to form solution A. Meanwhile, 38.4 g of NaOH (6 mol L−1) was diluted in 140 mL of deionized water to make solution B. Then solution C was obtained by mixing solution B with solution A. Subsequently, 0.05 g of NaBH4 dissolved in distilled water was added dropwise to solution C. Next, solution C was stirred vigorously for 30 min (25 °C) and poured into a hydrothermal reactor for 24 h at a constant temperature of 100 °C. The precipitate was subsequently treated in the same way as the PtNP@Ce(OH)3 precipitate. The prepared sample was labeled as PtNC@CeO2.
The details of other characterization techniques, such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, N2 adsorption–desorption, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), O2 temperature-programmed desorption (O2-TPD), NH3 temperature-programmed desorption (NH3-TPD), and H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) are described in the ESI.†
Subsequently, the thermal stability of PtNC@CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2 samples was tested under dry conditions at high and low conversions (Fig. 1b), respectively. For the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst, the toluene conversion remained at 60–70% for 15 h at 220 °C, while that was maintained essentially above 90% at 260 °C. As for the PtNP@CeO2 catalyst, the toluene conversion was kept between 60% and 65% for 15 h at 240 °C, while at 300 °C the toluene conversion was around 90% for 15 h, and slightly decreased after 10 h. Besides, we also performed stability tests (T90) on PtNC@CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2 catalysts for up to 40 h (Fig. S1b†). The PtNC@CeO2 sample still maintained 90% conversion, while the conversion of the PtNP@CeO2 sample was maintained above 85%. It was clear that the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst exhibited better durability at a high temperature than the PtNP@CeO2 catalyst. The strategy of in situ introduction of Pt species could effectively promote the catalytic activity as shown in Fig. 1a. In Fig. 1c, a comparison of T50 and T90 for each catalyst was drawn. The temperature order of the low conversions for each catalyst was similarly consistent with the order of the high conversions, and the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst demonstrated the best activity. In addition, the carbon balance based on the import and export concentration was calculated and the carbon balance of each catalyst was significantly better than 96%.
As shown in Fig. S2,† there was a certain linear relationship about the four samples of lnr and 1000/T, which was named as the Arrhenius curve, and the Ea value of each catalyst can be calculated. The results showed that the main order of the Ea value of each catalyst was PtNC@CeO2 (90.61 kJ mol−1) < PtNP@CeO2 (101.00 kJ mol−1) < PtNP/CeO2 (106.84 kJ mol−1) < PtNP@CeO2-MOF (108.11 kJ mol−1). It was also established that the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst had the highest activity, when the activity analysis was combined with the Ea value of each catalyst, which had an inverse pattern with regard to the activity. More importantly, the oxidation of toluene mainly depends on kinetics at low conversion (<20%), leading to the construction of the Arrhenius plot. Therefore, the credibility of the Ea value of this work was relatively high. In addition, both T50 and T90 of the catalysts were positively correlated with Ea (Fig. 1d), confirming that the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst had the most excellent catalytic performance.
The XRD patterns are shown in Fig. 3. The derived peaks of 28.6°, 33.1°, 47.5°, 56.3°, 59.1°, 69.4°, and 76.7° (2θ) were attributed to the (111), (200), (220), (311), (222) and (331) crystal planes of CeO2 with face-centered cubic structure, respectively. The results could be compared with the XRD peaks of CeO2 (JCPDS 34-0394), indicating that the four catalysts contained primarily the crystal structure of CeO2. At the same time, the XRD patterns showed no Pt-related diffraction peak, which may be related with the low Pt content or the existence of highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles. In common, the presence of wider peaks in the XRD diffraction peaks indicated that the active metal components exhibited high dispersion,41 which facilitated the emergence of more active sites and thus promoted the catalytic oxidation process. In contrast to the PtNP@CeO2 sample, PtNC@CeO2 showed a border peak width, which implied that it had a smaller grain size contributing to the generation of lattice defects.42,43 The XRD results demonstrated that the different methods of Pt and Ce introduction had an impact on the crystal sizes of the catalysts.
To gain insight into the molecular structure, Raman measurement was performed on the catalysts (Fig. 4). There were two main peaks for each catalyst in the Raman spectrum. The peak at around 458–464 cm−1 could be attributed to the Ce–O–Ce mode of the fluorite-type CeO2 structure (F2g).31 The peak of 579 cm−1 was attributed to the defect-induced (D) mode, which was associated with Ce3+-induced oxygen vacancies. Metal–support interactions, in general, influenced the energy produced by the band in the D mode, implying that various amounts of oxygen vacancies were formed. It can be seen in Fig. 4a that more oxygen vacancies were exhibited in the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst, which may be related to the presence of Ce3+ or may be due to the vibrations generated when the highly dispersed PtO interacts with the cerium oxide carrier to form Pt–O–Ce bonds, thus creating defects in the cerium oxide lattice, which was also consistent with the XRD result. Apparently, the D-mode peak of the PtNP@CeO2-MOF sample was relatively weak compared to that of the other three catalysts, which may also be caused by the insignificant interaction between the precious metal (Pt) and the carrier (CeO2). More importantly, through the magnified schematic of Raman (Fig. 4b), compared with the PtNP@CeO2-MOF sample, we found that the F2g mode bands of PtNC@CeO2, PtNP@CeO2 and PtNP/CeO2 catalysts showed a certain degree of red shift and the peak intensity also decreased to a certain degree. This suggested that the structure of fluorite might have changed, which was confirmed to be due to the emergence of Pt–O–Ce bonds. It is possible that the introduction of the reducing agent promoted the construction of point defects in the carrier, thus contributing to the SMSI effect.44 The Raman result elucidated that the formation of the SMSI effect in the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst caused the production of additional Pt–O–Ce bonds. At the same time, the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst generated more oxygen vacancies, which provided the active centers and promoted the catalytic reaction of VOCs. It was also verified that the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst had the best activity, which was in agreement with the activity result.
Furthermore, the molecular structure and chemical bonds in the catalysts can be identified in the range of 500–4000 cm−1 by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The FTIR results of PtNC@CeO2, PtNP@CeO2, PtNP/CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2-MOF are displayed in Fig. S4.† The broad peak at 3420 cm−1 was mainly attributable to the physically adsorbed water (H2O), while the band at 1578 cm−1 corresponded to the δ(OH) vibration of H2O molecules. The narrow band in the 2825–2990 cm−1 range was mainly associated with the incorporation of PVA. The presence of two broad bands within 990–1420 cm−1 was mainly related to the formation of “carbonate-like” materials on the surface of CeO2, possibly caused by residues in the catalysts,45 and the peak at 848 cm−1 corresponded to the metal–oxygen bond. Notably, the PtNP@CeO2, PtNP/CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2-MOF catalysts showed an asymmetric stretching vibration band of CO2 at 2352 cm−1, but the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst did not exhibit the corresponding peak. This indicated that CO2 from the calcination process was not easily adsorbed on the surface of the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst,46 suggesting that CO2 could be quickly desorbed. This may imply that the CO2 products during the catalytic reaction are easily desorbed, thus facilitating the catalytic reaction of VOCs.
Naturally, the data on the pore structure and specific surface of each catalyst are also important parts of the analysis of catalytic microstructure. Thus, the BET data of each sample were calculated and the outcomes are presented in Fig. 5 and S5† and Table 1. According to the IUPAC classification, the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of each catalyst exhibited distinct type IV isotherms with H3-type hysteresis loops of elongated crack-like structures.47,48Table 1 shows the detailed BET data for PtNC@CeO2, PtNP@CeO2, PtNP/CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2-MOF catalysts. The BET surface area of PtNC@CeO2 with Pt nanoclusters was 112.22 m2 g−1, the pore volume was 0.37 cm3 g−1, and the average pore diameter was 13.04 nm. Most importantly, PtNC@CeO2 had a larger specific surface, pore volume and average pore size than PtNP@CeO2, PtNP/CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2-MOF samples. Moreover, the order of the specific surface area was PtNC@CeO2 (112.22 m2g−1) > PtNP@CeO2 (104.69 m2g−1) > PtNP/CeO2 (98.44 m2g−1) > PtNP@CeO2-MOF (97.13 m2g−1). It is worth noting that there was a direct relationship with the activity of the catalysts. In Fig. 5b and the enlarged schematic, it can be seen that there are two distinct peaks in the pore size between 0 and 50 nm and the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst has the largest average pore size (13.04 nm) according to the data in Table 1. The PtNC@CeO2 sample prepared by an in situ confined-domain encapsulation method with the larger pore size was more suitable for anchoring Pt, thus facilitating the active sites' exposure, and the larger pore size facilitated the diffusion of reactants, thus accelerating the catalytic oxidation of toluene. Obviously, the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst with larger pore size did well for molecular retention and diffusion. In conclusion, the methods of the introduction of Pt and Ce were crucial to the microscopic properties. In Table 1, the individual BET data of the catalysts well confirmed the relationship between the microstructure and the catalytic performance of the catalysts. Compared with those of the PtNP@CeO2-MOF and CeO2-MOF samples, the pore structure data of the PtNP@CeO2-MOF sample were decreased by the introduction of Pt species, which may be one of the causes of the poor activity of the PtNP@CeO2-MOF sample. However, the comparison between the PtNC@CeO2 and CeO2–OH samples showed that the method of in situ introduction of Pt species had a positive impact on the BET surface area, pore size, and pore volume of the PtNC@CeO2 sample. In short, the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst with large specific surface area would provide more active sites to promote the adsorption, which may be one of the factors for the superior catalytic performance. Furthermore, with the help of ICP-OES, we observed that the Pt contents of each catalyst were close to the theoretical value (Table 1).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 The N2 physisorption isotherms of catalysts (a) and the BJH pore size distributions of catalysts (b). | ||
| Catalysts | BET surface area (m2 g−1) | Pore size (nm) | Pore volume (cm3 g−1) | Pt content (wt%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PtNC@CeO2 | 112.22 | 13.04 | 0.37 | 0.0075 |
| PtNP@CeO2 | 104.69 | 12.19 | 0.32 | 0.0113 |
| PtNP/CeO2 | 98.44 | 9.60 | 0.24 | 0.0073 |
| PtNP@CeO2-MOF | 97.13 | 7.49 | 0.18 | 0.0097 |
| CeO2–OH | 107.42 | 7.96 | 0.26 | — |
| CeO2-MOF | 87.03 | 8.33 | 0.23 | — |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 The XPS spectra about Ce 3d (a) and O 1s (b), the oxygen species ratios (c) and the active species ratios (d) of catalysts. | ||
| Catalysts | Ce3+/Cetotal | Ce4+/Cetotal | Olatt/Ototal | Oads/Ototal | OOH/Ototal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PtNC@CeO2 | 19.90 | 80.10 | 74.12 | 25.88 | — |
| u-PtNC@CeO2 | 14.64 | 85.36 | 66.23 | 30.19 | 3.58 |
| PtNP@CeO2 | 18.23 | 81.77 | 70.91 | 24.07 | 5.02 |
| u-PtNP@CeO2 | 15.16 | 84.84 | 66.80 | 26.27 | 6.93 |
| PtNP/CeO2 | 16.57 | 83.43 | 69.17 | 30.83 | — |
| PtNP@CeO2-MOF | 14.08 | 85.92 | 66.40 | 33.60 | — |
| CeO2–OH | 16.38 | 83.62 | 68.99 | 24.87 | 6.14 |
| CeO2-MOF | 14.03 | 85.97 | 65.57 | 34.43 | — |
Moreover, the O 1s spectra of each catalyst are displayed in Fig. 6. The fine peaks at 529.2–529.4 eV, 531.3–531.5 eV and 532.9 eV corresponded to lattice oxygen (Olatt), surface adsorbed oxygen (Oads) and surface hydroxyl (OOH), respectively.52,53 The four catalysts contained mainly Olatt and Oads with a small amount of OOH (Fig. 6b). We also performed XPS on the oxygen species content of fresh and used PtNC@CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2 catalysts, and the results are illustrated in Fig. S8;† there was a significant reduction of Olatt content in the used catalysts. Subsequently, the percentages of oxygen species for each catalyst were summarized and recorded in Table 2 and Fig. 6c for more visual analysis of the Olatt, Oads and OOH. Therefore, it is evident that the content of Olatt presented the following order: PtNC@CeO2 (74.12%) > PtNP@CeO2 (70.91%) > PtNP/CeO2 (69.17%) > CeO2–OH (68.99%) > PtNP@CeO2-MOF (66.40%) > CeO2-MOF (65.57%). Similarly, the introduction of Pt species favored the generation of lattice oxygen. According to previous studies,54,55 Olatt plays a key role in many thermocatalytic reactions. Olatt can oxidize the reducing molecules and then create oxygen vacancies, which are subsequently filled with the activation of molecular oxygen. The ratio of Olatt could explain that PtNC@CeO2 had the best catalytic performance. It has been proven that more Olatt generated sufficient oxygen vacancies, thus promoting toluene adsorption and activation. As shown in Fig. 6d, it can be concluded from the percentage of active species of each catalyst that Ce3+ and Olatt were the main active components to improve the activity of the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst. Also, the addition of Pt species effectively promoted the generation of Ce3+ species and lattice oxygen, which contributed to the production of more oxygen vacancies. Moreover, Ce3+ also facilitated the generation of unsaturated bonds and more Ce species would interact with Pt species, thus building Pt–Ce interfaces to promote the catalytic oxidation of VOCs.
To determine the types of oxygen species for each catalyst, O2-TPD curves are recorded in Fig. 7a. The peak at 100–325 °C was considered to be Oα, which was mainly present at the surface oxygen vacancies. The peak between 325 and 600 °C was caused by the desorption of Oβ, and this oxygen species was distributed at the surface lattice. The peak above 600 °C corresponded to Oγ, which was mainly found in the lattice bulk phase.56 For PtNC@CeO2 and PtNP@CeO2, the types of oxygen species were essentially the same. However, the O2-TPD curve of the PtNC@CeO2 sample exhibited higher mobility of Oβ and Oγ. Combined with the results of activity, it was revealed that Oβ and Oγ transfer from the body to the catalyst surface was accelerated during the reaction process,57 thus promoting the activation of VOCs. It has been shown that the methods of in situ introduction of Pt and Ce could alter the mobility of oxygen species. It was discovered that the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst contained different types of oxygen species. This indicated that the method of Pt and Ce introduction also had a great influence on the type of oxygen species produced by Pt–Ce-based catalysts. In short, the lattice oxygen was significant for the catalytic performance of the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst and might be probably due to the interaction between Pt nanoclusters and the carrier. According to the results of the above work, we suggested that the presence of more Ce3+ species and a substantial amount of lattice oxygen species on the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst may be one of the key factors to enhance the catalytic performance.
The reducibility of each species in the catalysts was tested by H2-TPR, and the results are presented in Fig. 7b and S10.† Each catalyst showed a wide reduction temperature interval (Fig. 7b), and the H2 consumption of the catalysts is shown in Table S2.† The finely fitted peaks of each catalyst are displayed in Fig. S10.† In general, the first reduction peak was classified as the reduction of adsorbed oxygen on the surface of CeO2. The second peak belonged to the reduction of adsorbed oxygen on the subsurface of CeO2.58–60 It is obvious from Fig. 7b that the reduction peaks of CeO2 shifted toward lower temperatures after the addition of Pt, and the onset reduction temperatures of each catalyst were in the order PtNC@CeO2 (67 °C) < PtNP@CeO2 (97 °C) < PtNP/CeO2 (133 °C) < PtNP@CeO2-MOF (159 °C) < CeO2 (333 °C). In addition, the lower onset reduction temperature indicated that the Pt species in the catalysts were more likely to produce active hydrogen and transfer it to the CeO2 carrier, thus greatly decreasing the reduction temperature of CeO2.61 Obviously, the H2-TPR of each catalyst confirmed the existence of a hydrogen overflow phenomenon. It should be noted that the onset reduction temperature of each catalyst remained positively correlated with the activity of each catalyst, indicating that the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst established a strong Pt–O–Ce interaction and more Pt active sites, which facilitated the production of more active hydrogen, thus significantly reducing the reduction temperature of CeO2 and promoting the activation of VOCs.62 However, the difficulty in reaching 90% toluene conversion of the PtNP@CeO2-MOF sample may also be due to extremely poor redox ability, which did not establish a solid interfacial effect between Pt NPs and CeO2, thus resulting in a decrease in activity.63 In conclusion, H2-TPR confirmed that the PtNC@CeO2 catalysts had a strong interaction between Pt and CeO2, so the main reasons for the best activity of the PtNC@CeO2 sample could be the formation of the SMSI effect and the highly dispersed Pt nanoclusters. Combined with Fig. 1a and 7b, it can be visualized that the low-temperature reduction peaks had a significant impact on the activity of the catalysts.
The results of NH3-TPD are exhibited in Fig. 8, S11,† and Table 3. The acid sites could be roughly divided into three types from Fig. 8a. The peaks below 200 °C belonged to weak acid sites, the peaks within 200–400 °C were assumed to be medium strong acid sites, and the peaks above 400 °C could be strong acid sites.64,65 Obviously, the PtNP@CeO2-MOF catalyst showed no significant peak in the range of 0–200 °C, while obvious weak acid sites were present in the other three catalysts. The NH3-TPD curves of PtNC@CeO2, PtNP@CeO2, and PtNP/CeO2 catalysts showed similar peak shapes within 400 °C. In addition, weak acid sites were useful for the adsorption of toluene molecules,42 which can effectively promote the oxidation of VOCs. As shown in Fig. 8b and Table 3, the content of each acid site could be clearly seen and the percentage of weak acid sites on the catalyst surface mainly followed the order PtNC@CeO2 (63.14%) > PtNP@CeO2 (41.25%) > PtNP/CeO2 (38.89%) > PtNP@CeO2-MOF. In addition, the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst with the largest amount of weak acid sites had the best activity, indicating that the weak acid sites were the main active sites, and the weak acid sites could strengthen and accelerate the adsorption of the reacting molecules, thus making it have excellent activity. Interestingly, the addition of Pt species decreased the number and intensity of weak acid sites on the CeO2 surface, but the method of in situ introduction of Pt species could effectively suppress the reduction of weak acid sites (Table 3). Therefore, it was revealed that the Pt and Ce introduction methods had different effects on the number and intensity of acid sites. Overall, the good activity of the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst may be due to the joint action of Pt nanoclusters and weak acid sites to promote the catalytic combustion reaction of VOCs.
| Catalyst | Weak acid (%) | Medium strong acid (%) | Strong acid (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PtNC@CeO2 | 63.14 | 24.90 | 11.96 |
| PtNP@CeO2 | 41.25 | 16.04 | 42.71 |
| PtNP/CeO2 | 38.89 | 10.36 | 50.75 |
| PtNP@CeO2-MOF | — | 27.44 | 72.56 |
| CeO2–OH | 67.34 | 24.30 | 8.36 |
| CeO2-MOF | 46.47 | 6.38 | 47.15 |
O bond), respectively. This affirmed that benzaldehyde species could accumulate rapidly and be converted to important intermediates in the adsorption process.68,69 In addition, peaks at 1302 cm−1, 1800 cm−1, 1867 cm−1 and 1960 cm−1 were correlated with maleic anhydride species.69,70 The details of each adsorption band are listed in Table S3.† The most important point is that the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst was capable of adsorbing and activating toluene at 100 °C and allowed toluene to interact with oxygen species at low temperatures to form various intermediates (benzoic acid, benzyl alcohol, maleic anhydride, etc.). It is worth mentioning that various intermediates were generated under a toluene/N2 atmosphere, indicating that lattice oxygen was present on the surface of the catalyst.
Besides, to investigate the mechanism of action of oxygen species, the toluene oxidation process on the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst was exposed to toluene/N2 and O2/N2 atmosphere at different temperatures (Fig. 9c and d), respectively. Fig. 9c and d presented similar spectra and also confirmed that lattice oxygen could be involved in the catalytic process of toluene without the need for gaseous oxygen. Additionally, a detailed control of the in situ DRIFTS spectra for different atmospheres at various temperatures (100 °C, 200 °C, 300 °C) was performed and the results are shown in Fig. 10a–f. Interestingly, the peak intensity in toluene/air was higher than that in toluene/N2 gas. It is possible that toluene molecules may not only be adsorbed by the metal active sites but also interacted with already adsorbed oxygen species to yield other substances. Moreover, sufficient gaseous oxygen can supplement the lattice oxygen to rebuild the reactive oxygen species.66 The features corresponding to each spectral band are also summarized in Table S3.† The original adsorption bands at 1030 cm−1, 1255 cm−1 and 1646 cm−1 gradually disappeared with increasing temperature, but the characteristic bands of benzoate species and alcohol salt species were significantly enhanced, revealing that these species were the essential intermediates in the catalytic process of toluene.71 Moreover, the carbonate species could be preferentially converted to CO2 and H2O on the surface. It is reasonably concluded that in the reaction of toluene over PtNC@CeO2 catalyst, the rate-determining step may be the further decomposition of the alcohol or carboxylic acid intermediate. Based on the analysis of results and Table S3,† it is clearly illustrated that the reaction process of toluene followed the following pathway: toluene → benzyl alcohol → benzaldehyde → benzoic acid → phenol → maleic anhydride → carbon dioxide and water.
In summary, we discovered that lattice oxygen was thought to serve the leading role in the removal of toluene compared to adsorbed oxygen. Therefore, the Mars–van Krevelen (MvK) mechanism was present in the toluene oxidation reaction over the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst. Scheme 2 describes the reaction pathways of toluene catalytic oxidation over the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst. After the passage of toluene, reactant molecules were adsorbed onto the oxygen vacancies, active species or active sites of the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst.43 Subsequently, the activated oxygen species interact with the C–H bonds of the methyl groups in toluene to form benzyl groups and further benzyl alcohol (C6H5–CH2O–). Then, the reactive oxygen species would further interact with C6H5–CH2O– to produce intermediates such as maleic anhydride, phenolate, and so on, and finally to generate carbon dioxide and water, which was well consistent with the MvK mechanism. During the catalytic process, abundant oxygen vacancies were generated due to the consumption of lattice oxygen which was continuously replenished with the help of gas-phase oxygen, thus achieving a reciprocal cycle of reactions.72 It is of interest that the relationship between the lattice oxygen and the reaction rate and the relationship between T90 and lattice oxygen (Fig. 10g) both confirmed well the critical effect of lattice oxygen in the toluene elimination. Furthermore, the highly dispersed Pt nanoclusters in the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst could be beneficial for adsorbing and becoming activated for the reactants, which may also be the reason for the ability of this type of catalyst to produce various intermediates at 100 °C. Hence, the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst promoted the emission reduction of toluene due to the formation of Pt nanoclusters, which could expose more metal active sites derived from the rich Pt–O–Ce interface.
In short, the generation of Pt nanoclusters, more Ce3+ species, more lattice oxygen, more weak acid sites, larger specific surface area, and strong interfacial effect between Pt and CeO2 combined to construct the PtNC@CeO2 catalyst with the most excellent activity (Fig. 10h). To verify the activity for the catalysts, kinetic studies were performed (Fig. 11). It can be found that the Rs and Rm values of PtNC@CeO2 were much higher than those of PtNP@CeO2 under the same conditions in Fig. S12,† which also implied that PtNC@CeO2 had superior catalytic activity.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3lf00147d |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |