Open Access Article
Diana Vanda Wellia
*a,
Atika Syafawia,
Yulia Eka Putri
a and
Muldarisnurb
aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia. E-mail: nandadiana@sci.unand.ac.id
bDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
First published on 10th October 2023
In this study, porous TiO2 photocatalysts modified by nitrogen (NCT) were successfully synthesized using a combination of green synthesis methods by utilizing Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. peel and hydrothermal method. In addition, TiO2 was modified by increasing the active surface area using Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB). The X-ray Diffraction (XRD) results indicated that the anatase phase was formed. The result of the Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy UV-Vis (DRS UV-Vis) using the Tauc-plot method showed that all porous N-doped TiO2 samples experienced a decrease in the energy gap. This indicates the successful modification of TiO2 by nitrogen, as confirmed by the Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) result. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) result showed that the synthesized TiO2 had a spherical morphology of 10–30 nm diameter. The Braunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) result indicated that the type IV isotherm curve with a mesoporous structure was formed. The NCT0.75 sample had a surface area and pore size of 95.02 m2 g−1 and 8.021 nm, respectively, while the NTi0.75 sample had a surface area and pore size of 90.97 m2 g−1 and 5.161 nm, respectively. The photocatalytic activity of the porous N-doped TiO2 was tested on photoreduction of metal pollutant model Cr(VI). The result demonstrated that the NCT0.75 sample had the most optimal photocatalytic activity by reducing 89.42% of Cr(VI) metal ions.
Photocatalytic is an effective, non-toxic, economical, and easy method to convert Cr(VI) to Cr(III). The photocatalytic process requires a catalyst, such as semiconductor catalysts, including TiO2, ZnO, ZnS, ZrO2, CdS, and WO3. Due to its electronic and optical properties, high photocatalytic activity, and non-toxicity, TiO2 is considered an ideal semiconductor catalyst.5 Pure TiO2 with an anatase phase has a band gap value of 3.2 eV, which is limited only under UV light. Several attempts have been made to expand the working ability of TiO2 to the visible light region, namely through metal doping, non-metal doping, and sensitization. Li et al. (2020) showed that nitrogen is the most effective dopant used because it can modify the electronic structure of TiO2 by forming a new band (N 2p orbital) above the valence band (O 2p orbital).6,7 In addition, efforts to increase photocatalytic activity can also be conducted by expanding the surface of the photocatalyst with the formation of pores.8
TiO2 nanoparticles can be synthesized using chemical and physical methods, such as solvothermal, sol–gel, hydrothermal, sonochemical, microwave, and ultrasonic irradiation. According to Byrappa and Adschiri (2007) and Hayashi and Hakuta (2010), hydrothermal synthesis is usually understood to involve heterogeneous reactions occurring in aqueous or non-aqueous fluids that result in crystallization above room temperature and at high pressure (>1 atm). The majority of scientists have used the word “solvothermal” to describe chemical reactions that happen in non-aqueous solvents. The closed stainless steel autoclave used for hydrothermal synthesis often has a Teflon coating to resist the high heat and pressures involved in this process.9 So this method requires high capital requirements for instrumentation, and the inability to monitor crystal growth, this method can only be carried out in supercritical solvent conditions, and uses non-aqueous solvents with very high boiling points.10
Physical methods include thermal decomposition, laser irradiation, and electrolysis while chemical methods use chemicals such as sodium borohydride or sodium citrate as reducing agents. Physical methods typically use highly intensive costly equipment that involves vacuum and chemical methods are considered the most commonly used technique to synthesize nanoparticles. Preparation through chemical and physical methods can lead to environmental problems upon discharge due to the usage of dangerous chemicals.11 So these methods not only require high energy and high pressure, but also they are expensive. Moreover, the chemical processes involve reducing and stabilizing agents producing by-products that are not environmentally friendly.12 Therefore, the nanoparticle biosynthesis method is used because of being environmentally friendly without the use of complex equipment and techniques and also high temperatures and pressures.13
Medicinal plant Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. can be selected as a reducing and stabilizing agent in the biosynthesis of N-doped TiO2 because it contains secondary metabolites, such as saponins, flavonoids, and tannins, acting as biogenic capping agents.14,15 A capping agent is a functional compound that maintains the shape of the particles by controlling the direction of crystal growth. Crystal growth can run fast which causes the resulting particle size to be large. Specifically, the capping agent will be in a particular crystal plane to lower the surface energy to direct the process nucleation forms stable TiO2.17
The application of N-doped TiO2 with high crystallinity and specific surface area is very important to increase photocatalytic efficiency. One way to develop a material with a high surface area is to introduce a pore-forming agent to the synthesis of the material. The synthesis of porous N-doped TiO2 using CTAB as a pore-forming agent was performed by Toe et al. (2018), leading to the production of a porous material with a high, uniform, and homogeneous specific surface area, thereby increasing photocatalytic activity.16 Therefore, in this study, CTAB was used as a pore-forming agent in synthesizing porous N-doped TiO2 and utilizing Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. bark extract as a natural capping agent using a combination of biosynthetic and hydrothermal methods. The resulting porous N-doped TiO2 was applied to reduce metal ions Cr(VI).
000 rpm) and washed with ethanol and distilled water three times each to remove impurities. Then the obtained precipitate was dried at 105 °C for 10 h and calcined at 500 °C for 1 h. The same treatment was also conducted on the control, namely the synthesis product, without adding CTAB.16 The obtained porous TiO2 nanoparticle from this initial step will use as the substrate for the N-doping process.
000 rpm), repeatedly washed with ethanol and distilled water, and dried in an oven at 105 °C for 10 h. The resulting product was labelled NCT0.25. The same steps were repeated for different volumes of 25% NH4OH, namely 0.5 mL, 0.75 mL, and 1 mL, with the product labels NCT0.5, NCT0.75, and NCT1 (see Table 1). TiO2 control samples were synthesized without the addition of CTAB (labelled as NTi) and NH4OH (labelled as CTO).19
:
Ti mole ratio of samples
| No. | Sample | Sample code | Mole ratio N : Ti |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Non-doped porous TiO2 | CTO | — |
| 2 | N-Doped TiO2 using CTAB | NCT0.25 | 1 : 1 |
| 3 | N-Doped TiO2 using CTAB | NCT0.5 | 2 : 1 |
| 4 | N-Doped TiO2 using CTAB | NCT0.75 | 3 : 1 |
| 5 | N-Doped TiO2 using CTAB | NCT1 | 4 : 1 |
| 6 | N-Doped TiO2 without CTAB | NTi0.75 | 3 : 1 |
O) groups. In the ionic state, Ti4+ repulsion occurs due to a similar charge. After being reduced to Ti0, Ti atoms can interact with each other through metallic bonds to form nano-sized clusters. The neutral charge of the Ti atom is due to the electron donation to the Ti4+ ion by the hydroxyl and carbonyl functional groups to produce Ti nanoparticles and to prevent agglomeration as a stabilizer.22,23 The mechanism of reduction of TiO2 nanoparticles by plant extracts can be seen in Fig. 1.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Mechanism of metal nanoparticles synthesis by plant extracts.23 | ||
Fig. 2 shows that all the synthesis results obtained are in powder form. The influence of the N/Ti mole ratio can be seen from the color of the TiO2 powder produced, namely pure white powder for undoped TiO2 (CTO) and yellowish-white for N-doped TiO2 (NCT) samples. Samples that are yellowish-white indicate that doping using nitrogen has been carried out successfully.16 Meanwhile, the results of previous studies reported that the synthesis of C–TiO2 with carbon dopant obtained a white powder before calcination and a grayish-white powder after the calcination process.24 Whereas the synthesis of Fe–TiO2 with Fe dopant shows the brown color from Fe-doped TiO2.25 So that it can be confirmed that it is a nitrogen dopant that has been induced into TiO2.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 Synthesized porous TiO2 and N-doped porous TiO2 nanoparticle samples: (a) CTO, (b) NCT0.25, (c) NCT0.5, (d) NCT0.75, and (e) NCT1. | ||
The role of CTAB as a capping agent is able to control particle size during the synthesis process so that the particle size becomes smaller and more uniform.26 Meanwhile, NTi0.75 showed that the particle shape was not entirely spherical, because the rod-shaped particles were found. Also, the dominant particle size distribution was in the range of 10–14 nm. Additionally, it can be seen that the NTi0.75 sample had a denser structure. This is due to the absence of CTAB as a pore-forming agent and particle size-controlling agent.27
EDX characterization was employed to determine the elemental composition of the samples, as shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 4 illustrates that the NCT0.75 and NTi0.75 samples had sharp and strong peaks in titanium (Ti) and oxygen (O). A nitrogen (N) peak was not detected in both samples because the detector was not sensitive enough to analyze elements with a small atomic number (Z < 11), such as nitrogen and boron. The EDX detector able to determine elemental nitrogen is the ultra-thin window (UTW) which has a high sensitivity.28
On the other hand, the absence of a nitrogen peak may be caused by the trace amount of added nitrogen as a dopant, so the instrument cannot detect the element. To confirm the presence of nitrogen-doped on TiO2, further characterization was conducted. For instance, the XRD data was utilized for the refinement process so that a peak shift could be seen in the presence of nitrogen doping on TiO2.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 XRD diffraction patterns of samples: (a) CTO, (b) NCT0.25, (c) NCT0.5, (d) NCT0.75, and (e) NCT1. | ||
The results of this study indicate that there is no significant difference between the obtained 2θ values and the standard data, both showing anatase crystals. However, it was observed that there is a phase transformation from anatase to brookite in NCT0.25, NCT0.5, and NCT0.75. This is indicated by a characteristic peak at 2θ = 30.8°, which can be originated from the brookite crystal surface indexed in the plane (121), based on ICSD standard no. 154605.
This result indicates that adding an appropriate nitrogen amount to the hydrothermal solution can cause the change of crystal phase from the anatase to an anatase–brookite mixed phase, better known as a heterostructured material, while the excess addition of nitrogen produces anatase TiO2 products with relatively low crystallinity, it can be seen from the NCT1 diffractogram that there is no brookite peak at 2θ = 30.8°.30,31 The formation of this heterojunction mixture enhances the photoreduction results, especially in the NCT0.75 sample, which can be considered the most optimum sample compared to others.
Nitrogen deposition has the effect of reducing band gap energy and making the material more active in visible light. The XRD diffractogram in Fig. 5 displays the typical TiO2 peak appearance. The successful impregnation of TiO2 or N–TiO2 serves as evidence of this. The anatase structure cannot be destroyed by doping TiO2, as the N–TiO2 diffractogram shows peaks that are comparable to TiO2. But according to earlier studies, the doping procedure might render a crystal lattice ineffective, and its result made N-doped TiO2 more photo catalytically active due to the decreased band gap energy.32
The crystal size of the synthesized material can be calculated from the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) value at peak (101) using the Debye–Scherrer equation. From the calculation results, the crystal size of the control TiO2 was 7.61 nm. The crystal size increased to 8.37 nm in the NCT0.25 sample by doping due to the larger atomic radius of nitrogen (N3− 1.46 Å) than that of oxygen (O2− 1.40 Å). Therefore, the crystal size increased by nitrogen doping. This can be explained by the fact that nitrogen doping can sharpen the XRD peak by increasing the crystal growth rate and the crystal size.33
Further analysis was performed by the refinement process using the Rietica program with the Le Bail method to obtain crystallographic data from the synthesized TiO2 and determine the effect of nitrogen dopant on TiO2 crystallographic data (Fig. 6). Refinement was conducted using the TiO2 standard anatase phase ICSD no. 9855 with a tetragonal structure, space group I41/amdS, length a and b 3.8040 Å, length c 9.614 Å, and cell volume 139.12 Å3. The refined results of nitrogen-doped porous TiO2 with variations in dopant volume of nitrogen (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mL) are shown in Table 2. The diffraction data of the nitrogen-doped porous TiO2 sample is in good agreement with the anatase standard. According to Andrieux et al. (2018), smoothing success is indicated by obtaining an R-profile (Rp) of less than 15%, an R-weight profile (Rwp) of less than 20%, and a goodness of fit (X2) of less than 5.34
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 Le Bail plot of samples: (a) CTO, (b) NCT0.25, (c) NCT0.5, (d) NCT0.75, and (e) NCT1 based on XRD data with space group I41/amdS. | ||
| Parameters | CTO | NCT0.25 | NCT0.5 | NCT0.75 | NCT1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Space group | I41/amdS | I41/amdS | I41/amdS | I41/amdS | I41/amdS |
| Crystal system | Tetragonal | Tetragonal | Tetragonal | Tetragonal | Tetragonal |
| Asymmetric unit (Z) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| a (Å) | 3.7786 | 3.7866 | 3.8024 | 3.7915 | 3.7791 |
| b (Å) | 3.7786 | 3.7866 | 3.8024 | 3.7915 | 3.7791 |
| c (Å) | 9.4693 | 9.4957 | 9.5385 | 9.5104 | 9.4703 |
| V (Å3) | 135.2034 | 136.1571 | 137.9071 | 136.7159 | 135.2512 |
| Rp (%) | 7.53 | 7.33 | 7.49 | 7.56 | 7.52 |
| Rwp (%) | 7.02 | 6.62 | 10.29 | 6.36 | 7.02 |
| GoF (χ2) | 0.1916 | 0.227 | 0.9562 | 0.1725 | 0.1916 |
Table 2 demonstrates that undoped TiO2 with N-doped TiO2 does not change its structure, such as space group, crystal lattice, and asymmetry. The magnification of the peak with the highest intensity indicates that the peak shift occurs due to the lattice tension on the crystal size. It can be seen that adding nitrogen dopants causes an increase in the values of lattice parameters: a, b, and c, as well as cell volume. The increase in cell volume was caused by the doping of nitrogen (1.46 Å) which has a larger atomic radius than oxygen (1.40 Å). So, the position of the oxygen atom can be occupied by nitrogen increasing the crystal lattice and hence the cell volume. The increase in cell volume after doping with nitrogen indicates that nitrogen was doped on the TiO2 lattice. It also confirms the peak shift in the XRD pattern toward a smaller 2θ.33,35
![]() | ||
| Fig. 7 DRS UV-Vis spectrum of all samples: (a) CTO, (b) NCT0.25, (c) NCT0.5, (d) NCT0.75, and (e) NCT1. | ||
Based on the results of DRS UV-Vis, the band gap energy for each sample can be calculated using the Tauc plot method, as shown in Fig. 8. In this study, the control TiO2 sample (CTO) had an energy gap of 3.2 eV. After doping using nitrogen, there was a decrease in the energy gap for samples NCT0.25, NCT0.5, and NCT0.75 by 3.16 eV, 3.15 eV, and 3.14 eV, respectively. However, the NCT1 sample experienced an increase in the energy gap to 3.16 eV. It is possible that the NCT1 sample had a change in crystal structure and composition due to the influence of adding excess nitrogen dopant.16
The most optimum sample synthesized in this study was NCT0.75 with the band gap energy of 3.14 eV, the lowest achieved value. The decrease in the gap energy as the result of nitrogen doping proves the successful doping of nitrogen on TiO2. It was confirmed that nitrogen dopant contributes to the narrowing of the band gap of the photocatalyst by forming a new N 2p band between the O 2p and Ti 3d orbitals in the valence band of the TiO2 electronic structure. Photons can trigger the transfer of electrons from the valence band to the conduction band by absorbing energy in the visible region corresponding to the lower band gap energy.7
| Wave number (cm−1) | Vibration type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CTO | NCT0.75 | NTi0.75 | |
| 3359 | 3741 | 3745 | Strain vibration of O–H |
| 1629 | 1635 | 1637 | Bending vibration of O–H |
| — | 1539 | 1535 | Vibration of N–H |
| 540 | 544 | 539 | Vibration of Ti–O, Ti–O–Ti, dan Ti–N |
Nitrogen-doped TiO2 samples (NCT0.75 and NTi0.75) showed absorption peaks in the region of 1530–1640 cm−1 while the TiO2 spectra without doping (CTO) only exhibited absorption peaks in the region of 1629 cm−1. The absorption peaks at 1539 cm−1 and 1535 cm−1 corresponded Ti–N bonds caused by NH2 vibrations indicating that nitrogen was doped to the titanium metal center. In Fig. 9a, the FTIR spectra indicate a wide band at wavenumbers 3350–3750 cm−1, which is an O–H strain vibration adsorbed on the surface. The absorption peak also appears at wave number 1629 cm−1, which is a bending vibration of dissociated O–H or water molecules adsorbed on the surface of TiO2 and the presence of N–H bonds.38 Fig. 9b and c illustrate that the resulting absorption bands are smaller due to the evaporation of the hydroxyl groups and water during the calcination and hydrothermal processes.39 The TiO2 spectra had broad absorption peaks in the range of wavenumbers between 400 and 800 cm−1 indicating strong strain vibrations of the Ti–O and Ti–O–Ti bonds in N-doped TiO2 and TiO2.33,40 Wavenumber 505.31–680.83 cm−1 is a characteristic of Ti–N bond vibrations.32
| No. | Sample | Specific surface area (m2 g−1) | Pore diameter (nm) | Pore volume (mL g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N-doped TiO2 with CTAB (NCT0.75) | 95.02 | 8.021 | 0.3902 |
| 2 | N-doped TiO2 without CTAB (NTi0.75) | 90.97 | 5.161 | 0.2398 |
Porous materials with a large specific surface area have not maximized the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Li, Xiao et al.19 synthesized mesoporous TiO2 spheres by further modifying nitrogen doping with the addition of CTAB as a pore-forming agent, resulting in a porous material that has a high specific surface area, homogeneous, uniform, and high concentration to enhance TiO2 photocatalytic activity in degrading pollutants. The relatively high specific surface area of the porous N-doped TiO2 can facilitate the diffusion of reactant molecules and offer more active sites for adsorption so that the photocatalytic process is more efficient.
So that it can be confirmed that the photocatalytic activity can be increased due to 2 factors: firstly the addition of a pore-forming agent (CTAB) to produce many and uniform pores, thus increasing the specific surface area of the porous N-doped TiO2 sample, and secondly doping using nitrogen to reduce the bandgap energy TiO2. Therefore, TiO2 is able to optimize its performance as a photocatalyst with a dual role of adsorption and photodegradation as well.
Based on Fig. 11, it can be explained that there was an interaction between TiO2 and surfactants. The surfactant forms a micelle to reduce surface tension. The positively-charged TiO2 material interacts electrostatically through O+ ions on H2O+ bound to the surface of TiO2 with Br− ions which are the hydrophilic part of CTAB.42 In the hydrothermal process, a crystallization process undergoes structural rearrangement due to heating to form a crystal core. At this stage, crystal growth occurs. In the next stage, calcination takes place with the purpose of decomposing the surfactants remaining in the pore material. The calcination in this study occurred at the temperature of 500 °C for 1 h which was much higher than the CTAB thermal decomposition temperature (300 °C). The calcination is expected to decompose the CTAB surfactant into O2, CO2, and H2O gases to leave open pores with a size matching the size of the surfactant.43
![]() | ||
| Fig. 11 Interaction between TiO2 and CTAB on micelle formation.42 | ||
The photocatalytic test was initiated with adsorption–desorption equilibrium in the dark for 210 min to observe the adsorption/absorption effect of the catalyst on the Cr(VI) solution. The metal ion Cr(VI) has a specific complexing reagent used in quantitative analysis, namely 1,5-diphenylcarbazide. The Cr–diphenylcarbazide complex produces a purplish pink color, the complementary color of the color absorbed by the complex. The color of a complex is caused by the transition of electrons from the ground state to a higher energy level. When the electron transition requires radiation in the visible light range, the color of the complex changes. Transition in this complexing reaction occurs with a charge transfer between metal to ligand and ligand to metal. The reaction can be seen in Fig. 12. The absorbance of the complex solution was measured at a wavelength of 543 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer.45
![]() | ||
| Fig. 12 Complexing reaction of 1,5-diphenyl carbazide with Cr(VI) ion.46 | ||
The photocatalytic test results in Fig. 13 compare the adsorption and reduction percentages of Cr(VI) for each catalyst at the 0th and 240th minute of irradiation. The percentage reduction of Cr(VI) ions from CTO, NCT0.25, NCT0.5, NCT0.75, NCT1, and NTi0.75 after 240 minutes of irradiation were 36.89%, 48.68%, 80.22%, 89, 42%, 81.38%, and 72.66%. The adsorption ability of the samples CTO, NCT0.25, NCT0.5, NCT0.75, NCT1, and NTi0.75 was 3.19%, 24.91%, 27.86%, 30, 66%, 29.3%, and 20.47%, respectively, for 210 minutes in the dark.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 13 Percentage of adsorption and reduction of Cr(VI) ions by catalysts: (a) CTO, (b) NCT0.25, (c) NCT0.5, (d) NCT0.75, (e) NCT1, and (f) NTi0.75. | ||
It can be seen from Fig. 13 NCT0.75 had the most optimum percentage of adsorption and reduction due to the addition of nitrogen dopants with the optimum volume of 0.75 mL. Modification using nitrogen dopants can narrow the TiO2 band gap. So, excited electrons from the valence band can be accepted by nitrogen above the valence band, which is then transferred to the conduction band with lower energy absorption. This can effectively inhibit the occurrence of photoexcited holes and also reduce electron–hole recombination. So it can increase the photocatalytic activity of TiO2.47 However, the nitrogen volume above 1 mL decreases the photocatalytic activity. This is because the higher volume of added dopant nitrogen beyond its optimum limit resulted in a partial covering of the TiO2 surface where the Cr(VI) reduction reaction occurred, thereby increasing the chances of electron–hole recombination during the photocatalytic process.44 As a result, the photocatalytic activity of Cr(VI) reduction decreased. In addition, the high percentage of photocatalytic activity in the NCT0.75 sample was caused by the formed anatase/brookite TiO2 heterostructured material, which was able to inhibit the rate of electron–hole recombination to extend the lifetime of a photocatalyst. This was associated with the synergistic effect of combining anatase and brookite TiO2 semiconductors affecting the increase in photocatalyst activity.48,49
In Fig. 14, it can be seen that electrons were able to move from the TiO2 brookite conduction band to the conduction band of TiO2 anatase. In contrast, h+ was able to move from the valence band of TiO2 anatase to the valence band of TiO2 brookite resulting in a high separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs. The anatase/brookite TiO2 heterojunction material had a high interfacial area, so the efficiency of separating electron–hole pairs and the photocatalytic activity increases.50
The increase in photocatalytic activity could also be influenced by adsorption factors, namely by adding CTAB as a pore-forming agent. The pores formed in the sample function as adsorbents that could reduce the concentration of the heavy metal Cr(VI). So the photocatalytic activity increased.8 It can be seen from the results of this study that the NCT0.75 sample had a higher reduction percentage (89.42%) compared to that of the NTi0.75 sample (72.66%). The difference between these two samples was due to adding CTAB to N-doped TiO2. Research by Li Hongliang et al. (2016) stated that CTAB added-TiO2 samples provided the highest photocatalytic percentage compared to that of other samples. This was attributed to the addition of CTAB as a pore-forming agent, which could increase the surface area of the sample.8
The percentage reduction increased with increasing irradiation time. By increasing the irradiation time, the catalyst receives light for a longer time, followed by generating more electrons. The resulting electrons play a role in the reduction reaction of Cr(VI). The overall reactions are as follows:
| TiO2 + hν → TiO2 (h+ + e−) | (1) |
| Cr2O72− + 14H+ + 6e− → 2Cr3+ + 7H2O | (2) |
| 2H2O + 4h+ → O2 + 4H + | (3) |
| O2 + 2H+ + TiO2 (2e−) → H2O2 | (4) |
| Cr2O72− + 3H2O2 + 8H+ → 2Cr3+ + 3O2 + 7H2O | (5) |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |