Kyohei
Yamashita
*a,
Koji
Yamada
b,
Kengo
Suzuki
b and
Eiji
Tokunaga
a
aDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan. E-mail: yamashita.k@rs.tus.ac.jp
bEuglena Co., Ltd., YBIC244, 1-6, Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan
First published on 14th August 2023
This paper proposes a low-cost technology for growing Euglena gracilis using beverages that people consume on a daily basis as a nutrient source. Among the 13 beverages tested, the most suitable one for growing E. gracilis was tomato juice. In four different brands of tomato juice, E. gracilis was grown to a cell density (107 cells per mL) comparable to that in KH medium, a conventional heterotrophic medium. The cost is only 1/6 of KH medium. In addition, growth of 100 times the initial cell density was observed in a medium containing tomato juice even without essential vitamins. Since this method does not use genetic modification or genome editing techniques and animal products, it expands the potential for the use of E. gracilis as a food.
Sustainability spotlightFood shortages and malnutrition are serious issues related to “food” that affect everyone in the world, and sustainable food production is desired. Euglena gracilis, a single-celled green alga that can grow through photosynthesis, synthesizes abundant nutrients and the functional component paramylon. This paper proposes an inexpensive technology for producing E. gracilis by using beverages that people consume on a daily basis as a nutrient source. This will enable the creation of a simple and inexpensive culture medium and eliminate the costs associated with conventional production processes (agitation, collection, drying, food processing, etc.). Therefore, the results of this research are expected to contribute to “Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture” under the SDGs. |
In recent years, the successful mass cultivation of E. gracilis has led to its commercial supply as a raw material for functional foods, cosmetics, and biofuels. E. gracilis is highly nutritious, as discussed below, and unlike other microalgae, it has no cell walls, making it easily digestible when ingested. This makes it suitable as a food ingredient, and mixing E. gracilis into a variety of foods can enhance their nutritional value. In terms of human nutritional sources, E. gracilis is known to store amino acids, vitamins, lipids, and other nutrients suitable for human consumption.3–5 The protein of E. gracilis is high in methionine,6 a characteristic of animal protein, and its nutritional value is comparable to the casein found in milk. This property is expected to create demand for E. gracilis from Halal and vegetarians as an alternative to animal protein. E. gracilis cells also contain the essential fatty acids, DHA and EPA. In addition, E. gracilis is known to store 60% of its dry weight, a special type of beta-1-3-glucan called paramylon.7 Paramylon has been verified for its immunomodulatory8 and liver protective effects,9 and has been shown to alleviate symptoms of atopic dermatitis,10 influenza,11 and arthritis,12 and has been suggested to prevent colon cancer.13
E. gracilis can utilize a variety of carbon sources to promote its own growth and assimilate ammonia-form nitrogen.14 In particular, glutamic acid is a highly valuable nutrient for E. gracilis because it can be used as both a carbon and nitrogen source.15 It requires V.B1 and V.B12 as essential vitamins for growth.16 Based on the above nutritional requirements, culture media have been developed for E. gracilis. Widely used are the Cramer–Myers (CM) medium,14 an autotrophic medium, and the Koren–Hutner (KH) medium, a high-yielding heterotrophic medium.15 As an example of a mass culture method, E. gracilis is cultured in large outdoor ponds, agitated by a rotating device.17 Further development of various harvesting and processing methods is needed to convert the growing E. gracilis culture into an industrially useable dry powder form. In the algae production process, concentrating mass-cultured E. gracilis by techniques such as centrifugation, and filtration requires power-driven machinery, which is energy-intensive. This accounts for approximately 20–30% of production costs, making efficient cell harvesting process a challenge.18 A harvesting method for E. gracilis that depends on gravity-induced sedimentation of swimming detect mutants are reported.19,20 Although the method does not require power-driven machines, it is supposed to take longer time to harvest than existing methods. One of the above mentioned mutants is produces by genome editing (GE) technology,19,23 which has been suggested as a suitable tool for use in food grade systems.21
The resulting concentrate is then added to clean water and concentrated again to obtain a clean E. gracilis cell concentrate. In the drying process, the concentrated liquid is powdered in a spray dryer, a device that sprays the liquid into a mist and instantly dries it by exposing the mist to warm air. Finally, the powder is sucked and collected in a cyclone (a device that sucks and separates powdered solids present in gas).22
One way to improve the efficiency of E. gracilis production without genetic engineering or GE technology is to optimize the growth medium, and attempts have been made to use food processing by-products as an organic carbon source. With producing E. gracilis using food-grade highly sterilized food processing by-products, the product is applicable to functional foods and pharmaceuticals. Specifically, potato liquor,23 corn steep solid,24 corn steep liquor and brewer's spent grain,25 kinnow peel extract,26 tofu wastewater,27 mixture of sewage and organic wastes (molasses, corn steep liquor, and waste wine)28 and Spent Tomato Byproduct (STB)29 have been used to grow E. gracilis to efficiently and economically produce paramylon. In growth using STB, hydrolysis treatment of STB and adjustment to the appropriate pH enabled the production twice the amount of biomass of CM medium.29
In this paper, we report that when E. gracilis was used for edible purposes, the use of foods that people consume daily (edible parts) as culture substrates resulted in higher production at lower cost than conventional production methods. Among the foods tested, the simple method of diluting tomato juice with water and adding essential vitamins can be used to grow to nearly 10 times the cell density of CM medium. It has the same cell density as in the heterotrophic medium, KH medium, yet costs 1/6th of it. With respect to the culture method (ref. 29) using STB described above, our method differs in that we use juice solution of edible parts instead of STB. In terms of using tomatoes as a nutritional source, our patent (JP6998157B2) was filed in 2017 (Japanese Patent Application No. JP2017170589A) and published in 2019 (Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. JP2019041715A), which precedes the research in the ref. 29.
This method is more economical because the culture medium can be used as-is as an edible part, eliminating the need for cell collection, drying, and food processing, as is the case with large-scale pooled cultures. The beneficial functionality and nutrients of E. gracilis can be added to conventional food products. It is expected to contribute to expanding the range of use of E. gracilis as food by providing them with higher nutritional value at a lower cost than existing food products at present.
• Samples were incubated under aerobic conditions.
• Light: white fluorescent light (90 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 23–25 °C.
• Initial cell density: 4.2× 103 cells per mL.
Cell counting was performed from day 8 to day 14 after the start of culture to generate a growth curve (Fig. 1).
Sample (soft drink) | Sample:sterile water | Sample [g] | Sterile water with cellsa [mL] | V.B1 [μg] | V.B12 [μg] | Total [mL] | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Cells washed with sterile water were included. b V.B1 was added in equal volume to CM medium. V.B12 was added in equal volume to KH medium. See Table S1 in the ESI on “Sample". | |||||||
CM (control) | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 3.50 |
Grape (3:7) | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.21 |
Grape (7:3) | 7:3 | 10.5 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.14 |
Pineapple | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.80 |
Apple | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.81 |
Amazake | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 5.71 |
Carrot (3:7) | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | — |
Carrot (7:3) | 7:3 | 10.5 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | — |
Tomato | 4:6 | 6 | 9 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 4.57 |
Orange | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 4.07 |
Grapefruit | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.48 |
Prune | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | — |
Coconut water | 14:1 | 14 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | — |
Maple water | 14:1 | 14 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | — |
Each sample was incubated for 11 days under the following conditions, after which the respective cell density was measured (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 Density of E. gracilis cells in non-autoclaved soft drink culture medium (11th day). Ratio in the figure indicates the volume ratio of “Soft drink:Sterile water” (V.B1 and V.B12 were added). |
• Samples were incubated under aerobic conditions.
• “Light” in Fig. 2: white fluorescent light (100 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 26 °C.
• “Dark” in Fig. 2: temperature: 23 °C.
• Initial cell density: 1.6 × 104 cells per mL.
Sample (soft drink) | Sample:sterile water | Sample [g] | Sterile water with cellsa [mL] | V.B1 [μg] | V.B12 [μg] | Total [mL] | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Cells washed with sterile water were included. b V.B1 was added in equal volume to CM medium. V.B12 was added in equal volume to KH medium. See Table S2 in the ESI on “Sample”. | |||||||
CM (control) | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 3.50 |
Grape | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.23 |
Pineapple | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.81 |
Apple | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 3.83 |
Amazake | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 5.73 |
Carrot | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | — |
Tomato (3:7) | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 4.55 |
Tomato (4:6) | 4:6 | 6 | 9 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 4.53 |
Orange | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | 4.08 |
Prune | 3:7 | 4.5 | 10.5 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 15 | — |
Each sample was incubated for 9 days under the following conditions, after which cell density was determined (Fig. 3).
• The screw-tube bottles were incubated under aerobic conditions with the lids lightly loosened.
• “Light” in Fig. 3: white fluorescent light (100 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 26 °C.
• “Dark” in Fig. 3: temperature: 23 °C.
• “Open” in Fig. 3: screw-tube bottle with the lid lightly loosened.
• “Close” in Fig. 3: screw-tube bottle lid tightly closed.
• Initial cell density: 1.1 × 104 cells per mL.
• E. gracilis was grown under the following four conditions for each food.
“Light/Open”, “Light/Close”, “Dark/Open”, and “Dark/Close”.
Sample (juice) | Sample:sterile water | Sample [mL] | Sterile water with cellsa [mL] | V.B1 [μg] | V.B12 [μg] | Total [mL] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Cells washed with sterile water were included. b Amount of V.B1 added is equal to that of CM medium. V.B12 is added in the same volume as KH medium. | ||||||
Paprika | 1:9 | 1 | 9 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 |
2:8 | 2 | 8 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 | |
3:7 | 3 | 7 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 | |
4:6 | 4 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 | |
5:5 | 5 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 | |
6:4 | 6 | 4 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 | |
7:3 | 7 | 3 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 | |
8:2 | 8 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 | |
10:0 | 10 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 10 |
Each sample was incubated for 12 days under the following conditions before cell density was determined (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5 Density of E. gracilis cells in paprika juice as culture medium (12th day). The ratio in the figure shows the volume ratio of paprika juice to sterile water (V.B1 and V.B12 were added). |
• Sample tubes were lightly uncovered and incubated under aerobic conditions.
• Light: white fluorescent light (45 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 26 °C.
• Dark culture: temperature: 23 °C.
• Initial cell density: 6.3 × 103 cells per mL.
See Fig. S2 and S3 in the ESI† for pictures of the culture medium and cells at the end of incubation.
Sample (soft drink) | Sample:sterile water | Sample [mL] | Sterile water with cellsa [mL] | V.B1 [μg] | V.B12 [μg] | Total [mL] | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Cells washed with sterile water were included. b A predetermined amount of wine was injected into the culture vessel and the alcohol was removed by boiling in hot water. Water evaporated during the removal of alcohol from the sample (red wine) was compensated by sterile water. The amount of V.B1 added was equal to the amount of CM medium. The amount of V.B12 added was equal to that of KH medium. “Red wine” delicious antioxidant-free wine (Fuyoka Red), Kirin Holdings Co. Ltd. “Grape juice” red grape (made by Nagoya Dairy Co., Ltd.). | |||||||
Red wineb | 2:8 | 10 | 40 | 5 | 0.35 | 50 | 3.27 |
Grape juice | 3:7 | 15 | 35 | 5 | 0.35 | 50 | 3.23 |
Red wineb | 1:9 | 3 | 27 | 3 | 0.15 | 30 | 3.36 |
Red wineb | 2:8 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 0.15 | 30 | 3.27 |
Red wineb | 3:7 | 9 | 21 | 3 | 0.15 | 30 | 3.24 |
Fig. 6 Growth curve in the early stage of growth. The ratio in the figure indicates the volume ratio of “Sample:Sterile water”. Total volume of each sample is 50 mL (V.B1 and V.B12 were added). |
• The sample tubes were lightly uncovered and incubated under aerobic conditions.
• Light irradiation conditions: constant white fluorescent light (40 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 26 °C.
• Initial cell density: 1.5 × 104 cells per mL.
Each sample was cultured under the following conditions and cell density was measured on day 9 from the start of culture (Fig. 9).
• The sample tubes were lightly uncovered and incubated under aerobic conditions.
• Light irradiation conditions: white fluorescent light (40 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 25 °C.
• Initial cell density: 2.9 × 104 cells per mL.
Sample | Sample amount | Sterile water [μL] | V.B1 [μg] | V.B12 [μg] | Total [mL] | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Amounts of V.B1, V.B12, and glutamic acid added were equal to those in KH medium. b Tomato (filtered): tomato juice (ideal tomato, ITO EN, Ltd.) filtered through filter paper (FILTER PAPER No. 2, Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd.). c Glutamic acid: L-glutamic acid (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). | ||||||
CM (control) | 3 [mL] | — | — | — | 3 | 3.50 |
Tomato | 900 [μL] | 2100 | 0 | 0.015 | 3 | 4.55 |
Tomato (filtered)b | 900 [μL] | 2100 | 0 | 0.015 | 3 | 4.54 |
Glutamic acid | 0.01 [g] | 3000 | 7.5 | 0.015 | 3 | 3.17 |
E. gracilis cell suspensions (2.4 × 105 cells per mL) cultured in CM medium for 4 days were transferred to 60 μL of each sample culture medium and cultured for 9 days under the following conditions.
• The sample tubes were lightly uncovered and incubated under aerobic conditions.
• Light: White fluorescent light (90–95 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 23.7–26.5 °C.
• Initial cell density: 4.8 × 103 cells per mL.
In laboran screw tube bottles (No. 5, AS ONE Corporation), various culture media were prepared according to the composition in Table 7 and then autoclaved.
Sample (juice) | Sample:sterile water | Sample [g] | Purified water [g] | V.B1 [μg] | V.B12 [μg] | Total [g] | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Tomato 1: ideal tomato (ITO EN, Ltd.) cf. same as “Tomato” in Tables 2, 3 and 6, and Fig. 2, 3 and 11. Tomato 2: tomato juice – no salt added (Kagome Co, Ltd.) cf. same as “Tomato” in Table 5, and Fig. 8 and 9. Tomato 3: tomato juice – no salt added, Del monte Quality (Kikkoman Corporation). Tomato 4: tomato juice – no salt added, Rich lycopene (Kagome Co, Ltd.). The amount of V.B1 added was equal to the amount of CM medium. The amount of V.B12 added was equal to that of KH medium. | |||||||
CM | — | 3.0 | — | — | — | 3.0 | 3.50 |
KH | — | 3.0 | — | — | — | 3.0 | 3.50 |
Tomato 1 | 3:7 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.55 |
Tomato 1 | 4:6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.53 |
Tomato 2 | 3:7 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.50 |
Tomato 2 | 4:6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.48 |
Tomato 3 | 3:7 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.47 |
Tomato 3 | 4:6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.45 |
Tomato 4 | 3:7 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.49 |
Tomato 4 | 4:6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 3.0 | 4.47 |
E. gracilis cell suspensions (9.8 × 105 cells per mL) cultured in CM medium for 13 days were transferred to 30 μL of each sample culture medium and cultured for 10 days under the following conditions. All samples were made in duplicate (only “Tomato 1 (4:6)” made three) and cell densities were measured on day 10 (Fig. 12).
• The sample tubes were lightly uncovered and incubated under aerobic conditions.
• Light: white fluorescent light (90 μmol m−2 s−1), temperature: 26.0–27.4 °C.
• Initial cell density: 9.8 × 103 cells per mL.
In terms of cell coloration, E. gracilis grown in tomato juice was found to have bright green chloroplasts densely packed inside the cells, similar in size and shape to those grown in CM medium (Fig. S2 and S3 in the ESI,†cf.Fig. 12). On the other hand, some cells grown in beverages other than tomato juice had slightly less chloroplasts or a lighter green. This indicates that, compared to other beverages, tomato juice contains a good balance of the types and amounts of vitamins and trace elements suitable for the growth of E. gracilis (Table S4 in the ESI†). In the absence of light, the growing cells were light yellow-green in all samples.
Continued observation showed that the steady state was reached sequentially from the lowest to the highest concentration of paprika juice solution, and the 100% concentration reached the steady state 12 days after the start of incubation (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 9 Cell density in medium without essential vitamins (9th day). The ratio in the figure indicates the volume ratio of “tomato juice:sterile water”. Neither V.B1 nor V.B12 were added. |
In Fig. 11, the cell density of “Tomato (filtered)” was greater than that of “Tomato”, suggesting that the removal of solid components may mitigate the limiting factor due to the density effect of E. gracilis (growing space, acquisition of light levels and nutrients, and accumulation of wastes). In addition, V.B1 does not necessarily need to be added in tomato juice medium, as the steady-state cell density in this experiment was comparable to that in KH medium (107 cells per mL), despite the fact that V.B1, an essential vitamin, was not added. The cell density of “Glutamic acid” in Fig. 11 is lower than that of the CM medium. This indicates that good growth cannot be achieved with glutamic acid (carbon and nitrogen source) alone.
The results of growth in CM medium with glutamic acid or Ajinomoto® (a chemical seasoning based on monosodium glutamate) instead of water as a solvent showed that the cell density reached 2 to 3 times that of CM medium (see Table S3, Fig. S1 in the ESI†). However, this cell density was about half that of tomato juice medium, suggesting that components in tomato juice other than glutamic acid (or monosodium glutamate) also contribute to good growth.
Fig. 12 Culture medium and cells in different brands of tomato juice medium. A scale bar is the same size for all micrographs. |
Fig. 13 shows the cell density of E. gracilis in the well-stirred culture medium of each sample in Fig. 12(b). For all brands of tomato juice, “Tomato juice:Sterile water = 4:6” shows growth to the order of 107 cells per mL, which is the cell density in KH medium. “Tomato 3 (3:7)” had the lowest cell density among these, but it was still larger than the cell densities in Fig. 2 and 3 when grown in the other beverages. From the above, it appears that the cell density in the stationary phase is more influenced by the type of juice than by the brand of juice. For “Tomato 1”, tests were conducted in 2017 (Fig. 2 and 3), 2021 (Fig. 11), and 2023 (Fig. 13), and tomato juice was purchased each time. The fact that these results are almost identical suggests that the variation in quality in the same brand is small. This is likely because all manufacturers set the concentration of their juices according to people's tastes, so unless they are made by a special process or concentrated, they do not differ significantly.
The numbers on the horizontal axis of Fig. 14 indicate the 18 amino acids, and the table at the top of the figure is the corresponding table. The three colours in the table correspond to the respective colours of “Effect on growth” in the figure.15 The vertical axis of the figure shows the percentage of each of the 18 individual amino acids relative to the total weight of the 18 amino acids in 100 g of edible portion of a food. The amino acid composition of Euglena was analyzed by the Japan Food Analysis Center.34 For other foods, the amino acid composition table per 100 g of edible portion of the Japanese Standard Tables of Food Composition 2015 (7th revision), Chapter 2, Table 1, Amino Acid Composition Table, which was applicable at the time this study was conducted, was referenced. However, the experiments in Fig. 10, 11 and S1 (see ESI†) were conducted after 2020, but the data (amino acid composition per 100 g edible portion) of the foods used were exactly the same in the 2020 edition of the Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, which was applied at that time, so they are not distinguished.
Foods that had good growth are characterized by a high content of glutamic acid (No. 15) and aspartic acid (No. 14). These are amino acids that promote growth in Euglena, especially glutamic acid, which can be used as both a carbon and nitrogen source,15 indicating that its abundance is favorable for growth. The correlation coefficients for the amino acid composition of Euglena are 0.65 for tomato juice and 0.64 for red bell pepper, indicating a positive correlation. The synthetic medium CM medium contains 13 chemicals and the KH medium contains 26 chemicals. Estimating the price of the culture medium, KH medium is about 7.7 times more expensive than CM medium, and the cell density in the stationary phase is about 10 times higher than that. In this method using tomato juice solution, the culture medium containing two nutrient sources (tomato juice solution and V.B12) is 1.2 times the cost of CM medium (1/6 of KH medium) yet allows the cells to reach a cell density similar to that of KH medium. Thus, this is a more easily adjusted and less expensive culture medium than conventional synthetic media.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fb00086a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |