Hypervalent iodine-mediated β-difluoroalkylboron synthesis via an unusual 1,2-hydrogen shift enabled by boron substitution

Abstract

β-Difluoroalkylborons, featuring functionally important CF₂ moiety and synthetically valuable boron group, have great synthetic potential while remaining synthetically challenging. Herein we report a hypervalent iodine-mediated oxidative gem-difluorination strategy to realize the construction of gem-difluorinated alkylborons via an unusual 1,2-hydrogen migration event, in which the (N-methyliminodiacetyl) boronate (BMIDA) motif is responsible for the high regio- and chemoselectivity. The protocol provides facile access to a broad range of β-difluoroalkylborons under rather mild conditions. The value of these products was demonstrated by further transformations of the boryl group into other valuable functional groups, providing a wide range of difluorine-containing molecules.

---

Organofluorine compounds have been widely applied in medicinal chemistry and materials science.^1a–d In particular, the gem-difluoro moiety featuring unique steric and electronic properties can act as a chemically inert isostere of a variety of polar functional groups.^2a–c Therefore, the construction of gem-difluoro-containing compounds has received considerable attention in recent years. Efficient methods including deoxyfluorination of carbonyl compounds,^3a,b photoredox difluorination,⁴ radical difluorination,⁵ and cross-coupling reactions with suitable CF₂ carriers^6a–f are well developed. Alternatively, iodoarene-mediated oxidative difluorination reactions provide valuable access to these motifs by using simple alkenes as starting materials.^7a–i Previously, these reactions were generally associated with a 1,2-aryl or 1,2-alkyl migration (Scheme 1a).^7a–f Recent developments also allowed the use of heteroatoms as migrating groups, thereby furnishing gem-difluoro compounds equipped with easily transformable functional groups (Scheme 1b). In this regard, Bi and coworkers reported an elegant 1,2-azide migrative gem-difluorination of α-vinyl azides, enabling the synthesis of a broad range of novel β-difluorinated alkyl azides.^7g Jacobsen developed an iodoarene-catalyzed synthesis of gem-difluorinated aliphatic bromides featuring 1,2-bromo migration with high enantioselectivity.^7h Almost at the same time, research work from our group demonstrated that not only bromo, but also chloro and iodo could serve as viable migrating groups.⁷ⁱ

Scheme 1 Hypervalent iodine-mediated β-difluoroalkylboron synthesis.

We have been devoted to developing new methodologies for the assembly of boron-containing building blocks by using easily accessible and stable MIDA (N-methyliminodiacetyl) boronates^8a–c as starting materials.^9a–e Recently, we realized a hypervalent iodine-mediated oxidative difluorination of aryl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronates.^9d Depending on the substitution patterns, the reaction could lead to the synthesis of either α- or β-difluoroalkylborons via 1,2-aryl migration (Scheme 1c). Recently, with alkyl-substituted branched alkenyl MIDA boronates, Szabó and Himo observed an interesting bora-Wagner–Meerwein rearrangement, furnishing β-difluorinated alkylboronates with broader product diversity (Scheme 1d).¹⁰ While extending the scope of our previous work,^9d we found that the use of linear alkyl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronates also delivers β-difluoroalkylboron products. Intriguingly, instead of an alkyl- or boryl-migration, an unusual 1,2-hydrogen shift takes place. It should be noted that internal inactivated alkenes typically deliver the 1,2-difluorinated products, with no rearrangement taking place.^11a–d Herein, we disclose our detailed study of our second generation of β-difluoroalkylborons synthesis (Scheme 1e). The starting linear 1,2-disubstituted alkyl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronates, unlike the branched ones,¹⁰ could be readily prepared via a two-step sequence consisting of hydroborylation of the terminal alkyne and a subsequent ligand exchange with N-methyliminodiacetic acid. This intriguing 1,2-H shift was found to be closely related to the boron substitution, probably driven thermodynamically by the formation of the β-carbon cation stabilized by a σ(C–B) bond via hyperconjugation.^12a–d

To start, we employed benzyl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronate 1a as a model substrate (Table 1). In accordance with our previous observations,^9d the use of F sources such as CsF, AgF and Et₃N·HF in association with PhI(OAc)₂ (PIDA) as the oxidant and DCM as the solvent led to no reaction (entries 1 to 3). The use of Py·HF (20 equiv) successfully provided β-difluorinated alkylboronate 2a, derived from an unusual 1,2-hydrogen migration, in 39% yield (entry 4). By simply increasing the loading of Py·HF to 40 equivalents, a higher conversion and thus an improved yield of 61% was obtained (entry 5). No further improvement was observed by using a large excess of Py·HF (100 equiv) (entry 6). Other hypervalent iodine oxidants such as PhIO or PIFA were also effective but resulted in reduced yields (entries 7 and 8). A brief survey of other solvents revealed that the original DCM was the optimal one (entries 9 and 10).

Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditions

Entry	F^− (equiv)	Oxidant	Solvent	Yield (%)
1	CsF (2.0)	PIDA	DCM	0
2	AgF (2.0)	PIDA	DCM	0
3	Et3N·HF (40.0)	PIDA	DCM	0
4	Py·HF (20.0)	PIDA	DCM	39
5	Py·HF (40.0)	PIDA	DCM	61
6	Py·HF (100.0)	PIDA	DCM	55
7	Py·HF (40.0)	PIFA	DCM	52
8	Py·HF (40.0)	PhIO	DCM	26
9	Py·HF (40.0)	PIDA	DCE	49
10	Py·HF (40.0)	PIDA	Toluene	46

---

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we set out to investigate the scope and limitation of this gem-difluorination reaction. The reaction of a series of E-type 1,2-disubstituted alkenyl MIDA boronates were first examined. As shown in Scheme 2, the reaction of substrates with primary alkyl (1b, 1e–g), secondary alkyl (1c, 1d), or benzyl (1h–k) groups proceeded efficiently to give the corresponding gem-difluorinated alkylboronates in moderate to good yields. Halides (1i–k, 1m) and cyano (1l) were well tolerated in this reaction. Of note, cyclic alkene 1n is also a viable substrate, affording an interesting gem-difluorinated cyclohexane product (2n).

Scheme 2 Scope of 1,2-H migratory gem-difluorinations. ^a 4 h. ^b PIFA was used.

To define the scope further, the substrates with Z configuration were also employed under the standard reaction conditions (eqn (1) and (2)). The same type of products were isolated with comparable efficiency, suggesting that the reaction outcome is independent of the substrate configuration and substrates with Z configuration also have a profound aptitude of 1,2-hydrogen migration. Nevertheless, the reaction of t-butyl substituted alkenyl MIDA boronate (1p) delivered a normal 1,2-difluorinated alkylboron product (eqn (3)). The 1,2-hydrogen migration was completely suppressed probably due to unfavorable steric perturbation. With an additional alkyl substituent introduced, a 1,2-alkyl migrated product was formed as expected (eqn (4)).

The gem-difluorination protocol was amenable to gram-scale synthesis of 2a (Scheme 3, 8 mmol scale of 1a, 1.24 g, 50%). To assess the synthetic utility of the resulting β-difluorinated alkylborons, transformations of the C–B bond were carried out (Scheme 3). Ligand exchange of 2a furnished the corresponding pinacol boronic ester 4 without difficulty, which could be ligated with electron-rich aromatics to obtain 5 and 6 in moderate yields. On the other hand, 2a could be oxidized with high efficiency to alcohol 7 using H₂O₂/NaOH. The hydroxyl group of 7 could then be converted to bromide 8 or triflate 9. Both serve as useful electrophiles that can undergo intermolecular S_N2 substitution with diverse nitrogen- (10, 13), oxygen- (14), phosphorus- (11) and sulfur-centered (12) nucleophiles.

Scheme 3 Product derivatizations. PMB = p-methoxyphenyl.

To gain insight into the reaction mechanism, preliminary mechanistic studies were conducted. The reaction employing deuterated alkenyl MIDA boronate [D]-1a efficiently afforded difluorinated product [D]-2a in 72% isolated yield, clearly demonstrating that 1,2-H migration occurred (Scheme 4a). However, when the MIDA boronate moiety was replaced with a methyl group (15), no difluorinated product (derived from 1,2-migration) was detected at all, suggesting an indispensable role of boron for promoting the 1,2-migration event (Scheme 4b). Also, with a Bpin congener of 1a, the reaction led to large decomposition of the starting material, with no desired product being formed (Scheme 4b).

Scheme 4 Mechanistic studies and proposals.

Based on the literature precedent and these experiments, a possible reaction mechanism is proposed in Scheme 4c. With linear alkenyl MIDA boronates, the initial coordination of the double bond to an iodium ion triggered a regioselective fluoroiodination to deliver intermediate B. The regioselectivity could arise from an electron-donating inductive effect from boron due to its low electronegativity, consistent with previous observations.^13a,b Thereafter, a 1,2-hydrogen shift, rather than the typical direct fluoride substitution of the C–I bond, provides carbon cation C. The formation of a hyperconjugatively stabilized cation is believed to be the driving force for this event.^12a–d The trapping of this cation finally forms the product.

In conclusion, we demonstrated herein our second generation of β-difluoroalkylboron synthesis via oxidative difluorination of easily accessible linear 1,2-disubstituted alkenyl MIDA boronates. An unexpected 1,2-hydrogen migration was observed, which was found to be triggered by a MIDA boron substitution. Mild reaction conditions, moderate to good yields and excellent regioselectivity were achieved. The applications of these products allowed the facile preparation of a wide range of gem-difluorinated molecules by further transformations of the boryl group.

Data availability

Data for this work, including experimental procedures, characterization data for all new compounds are provided in the ESI.†

Author contributions

W.-X. L. and H. W. conceived the project. W.-X. L., Y. L., Y.-H. C., D.-H. T., Z. L. and J.-L. L. analysed the experimental results. W.-X. L., Q. L. and Y. L. performed the derivatizations and mechanistic studies. H. W. directed the project and composed the manuscript with input from all the authors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22022114, 21971261), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515010624), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20ykzd12) and the Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (2017BT01Y093).

Notes and references

1. References about the development and application of organofluorine compounds, see: (a) D. O'Hagan and D. Harper, J. Fluorine Chem., 1999, 100, 127; (b) W. K. Hagmann, J. Med. Chem., 2008, 51, 4359; (c) X. Yang, T. Wu, R. J. Phipps and F. D. Toste, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 826; (d) T. Liang, C. N. Neumann and T. Ritter, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 8214.
2. For selected examples about the gem-difluoro moiety, see: (a) C. D. Sessler, M. Rahm, S. Becker, J. M. Goldberg, F. Wang and S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 9325; (b) D. O'Hagan, Y. Wang, M. Skibinski and A. M. Z. Slawin, Pure Appl. Chem., 2012, 84, 1587; (c) N. A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54, 2529.
3. (a) W. J. Middleton, J. Org. Chem., 1975, 40, 574; (b) R. P. Singh and J. M. Shreeve, Synthesis, 2002, 17, 2561–2578.
4. J.-B. Xia, C. Zhu and C. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 17494.
5. P. Xu, S. Guo, L. Wang and P. Tang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5955.
6. (a) P. S. Fier and J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 5524; (b) Z. Feng, Q.-Q. Min, Y.-L. Xiao, B. Zhang and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 1669; (c) Y. Gu, X. Leng and Q. Shen, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 5405; (d) Y.-L. Xiao, W.-H. Guo, G.-Z. He, Q. Pan and X. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 9909; (e) G. K. S. Prakash, S. K. Ganesh, J.-P. Jones, A. Kulkarni, K. Masood, J. K. Swabeck and G. A. Olah, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 12090; (f) Y. Fujiwara, J. A. Dixon, F. O'Hara, E. D. Funder, D. D. Dixon, R. A. Rodriguez, R. D. Baxter, B. Herlé, N. Sach, M. R. Collins, Y. Ishihara and P. S. Baran, Nature, 2012, 492, 95.
7. For selected examples about iodoarene-mediated oxidative difluorination reactions, see: (a) S. M. Banik, J. W. Medley and E. N. Jacobsen, Science, 2016, 353, 51; (b) F. Scheidt, J. Neufeld, M. Schäfer, C. Thiehoff and R. Gilmour, Org. Lett., 2018, 20, 8073; (c) B. Zhou, M. K. Haj, E. N. Jacobsen, K. N. Houk and X.-S. Xue, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 15206; (d) T. Kitamura, K. Muta and J. Oyamada, J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80, 10431; (e) N. O. Ilchenko, B. O. A. Tasch and K. J. Szabó, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 12897; (f) S. Hara, J. Nakahigashi, K. Ishi-i, T. Fukuhara and N. Yoneda, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 2589; (g) Y. Ning, P. Sivaguru, G. Zanoni, E. A. Anderson and X. Bi, Chem, 2020, 6, 486; (h) M. D. Levin, J. M. Ovian, J. A. Read, M. S. Sigman and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 14831; (i) C. Li, Y. Liao, X. Tan, X. Liu, P. Liu, W.-X. Lv and H. Wang, Sci. China: Chem., 2021, 64, 999.
8. (a) T. Mancilla, R. Contreras and B. Wrackmeyer, J. Organomet. Chem., 1986, 307, 1; (b) D. M. Knapp, E. P. Gillis and M. D. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6961; (c) E. P. Gillis and M. D. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 6716.
9. For selected examples of our previous work about the assembly of boron-containing building blocks, see: (a) Y.-F. Zeng, W.-W. Ji, W.-X. Lv, Y. Chen, D.-H. Tan, Q. Li and H. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 14707; (b) W.-X. Lv, Y.-F. Zeng, Q. Li, Y. Chen, D.-H. Tan, L. Yang and H. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 10069; (c) H. Wang, Y.-F. Zeng, W.-X. Lv and D.-H. Tan, Synlett, 2018, 29, 1415; (d) W.-X. Lv, Q. Li, J.-L. Li, Z. Li, E. Lin, D.-H. Tan, Y.-H. Cai, W.-X. Fan and H. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 16544; (e) L. Yang, D.-H. Tan, W.-X. Fan, X.-G. Liu, J.-Q. Wu, Z.-S. Huang, Q. Li and H. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 3454.
10. Q. Wang, M. Biosca, F. Himo and K. J. Szabó, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 26327.
11. For selected examples about difluorination of internal unactivated alkenes, see: (a) I. G. Molnár and R. Gilmour, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 5004; (b) S. M. Banik, J. W. Medley and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 5000; (c) S. V. Kohlhepp and T. Gulder, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 6270; (d) I. G. Molnár, C. Thiehoff, M. C. Holland and R. Gilmour, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 7167.
12. (a) Z. He and A. K. Yudin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 13770; (b) J. Li and M. D. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 13774; (c) R. K. Shiroodi, O. Koleda and V. Gevorgyan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 13146; (d) C. F. Lee, D. B. Diaz, A. Holownia, S. J. Kaldas, S. K. Liew, G. E. Garrett, T. Dudding and A. K. Yudin, Nat. Chem., 2018, 10, 1062.
13. (a) W.-X. Lv, Z. Li, E. Lin, J.-L. Li, D.-H. Tan, Y.-H. Cai, Q. Li and H. Wang, Chem.–Eur. J., 2019, 25, 4058; (b) W.-X. Fan, J.-L. Li, W.-X. Lv, L. Yang, Q. Li and H. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2020, 56, 82.

---

Footnote

† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d1sc06508d

---