DOI:
10.1039/D2RA90073D
(Correction)
RSC Adv., 2022,
12, 20762-20764
Correction: Modification of silica nanoparticles by 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde and 5-bromosalicylaldehyde as new nanocomposites for efficient removal and preconcentration of Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions from water, blood, and fish muscles
Received
11th July 2022
, Accepted 11th July 2022
First published on 19th July 2022
Abstract
Correction for ‘Modification of silica nanoparticles by 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde and 5-bromosalicylaldehyde as new nanocomposites for efficient removal and preconcentration of Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions from water, blood, and fish muscles' by Hanem M. Gad et al., RSC Adv., 2022, 12, 19209–19224, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA03177A.
The authors regret that the units of the concentration in Tables 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 were not correctly given in the original article. In Tables 7 and 8, the tolerance limit should be given in μg L−1. In Tables 9, 10, 11, and 12 the found concentration should be given in μg L−1. The corrected versions of the tables are shown below.
Table 7 Removal of Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions from binary mixtures using N1 nanocomposite in the presence of different diverse ions
Diverse ion |
Tolerance limit (μg L−1) |
% R |
Cu(II) |
Cd(II) |
K(I) |
900 |
99.15 |
99.96 |
Na(I) |
900 |
99.24 |
99.65 |
Ca(II) |
120 |
98.38 |
99.08 |
Ba(II) |
80 |
99.08 |
99.18 |
Mg(II) |
120 |
97.17 |
99.00 |
Hg(II) |
80 |
98.57 |
98.37 |
Fe(II) |
120 |
97.39 |
99.14 |
Mn(II) |
80 |
96.79 |
97.76 |
Ni(II) |
80 |
95.87 |
96.79 |
Al(III) |
80 |
98.16 |
98.45 |
Fe(III) |
100 |
99.46 |
99.53 |
HCO3− |
1000 |
99.68 |
99.78 |
NO3− |
1000 |
99.73 |
99.65 |
Cl− |
1000 |
99.82 |
99.72 |
SO42− |
1000 |
99.18 |
99.64 |
Table 8 Removal of Cu(II) and Cd(II) ions from binary mixtures using N2 nanocomposite in the presence of different diverse ions
Diverse ion |
Tolerance limit (μg L−1) |
% R |
Cu(II) |
Cd(II) |
K(I) |
900 |
99.26 |
99.78 |
Na(I) |
900 |
99.37 |
99.89 |
Ca(II) |
120 |
98.26 |
99.16 |
Ba(II) |
80 |
99.65 |
99.32 |
Mg(II) |
120 |
97.28 |
99.43 |
Hg(II) |
80 |
98.54 |
98.52 |
Fe(II) |
120 |
97.31 |
98.95 |
Mn(II) |
80 |
96.64 |
98.15 |
Ni(II) |
80 |
95.77 |
96.64 |
Al(III) |
80 |
98.53 |
98.83 |
Fe(III) |
100 |
99.36 |
99.73 |
HCO3− |
1000 |
99.47 |
99.58 |
NO3− |
1000 |
99.17 |
99.28 |
Cl− |
1000 |
99.63 |
99.71 |
SO42− |
1000 |
99.13 |
99.82 |
Table 9 Determination of Cu(II) ions in real samples using N1 nanocomposite
Sample |
Added volume from Cu(II) stock solution (1000 μg L−1) |
0 mL |
0.2 mL |
0.4 mL |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Sea water |
4.600 ± 0.124 |
— |
2.174 |
7.040 ± 0.142 |
97.139 |
1.619 |
9.62 ± 0.309 |
97.362 |
2.589 |
Tap water |
8.320 ± 0.492 |
— |
2.150 |
10.816 ± 0.255 |
98.709 |
1.901 |
13.580 ± 0.492 |
99.993 |
2.918 |
Fish muscles |
7.230 ± 0.247 |
— |
2.749 |
9.820 ± 0.254 |
99.490 |
2.087 |
12.400 ± 0.351 |
99.226 |
2.281 |
Blood |
1.090 ± 0.028 |
— |
2.051 |
3.580 ± 0.104 |
95.551 |
2.337 |
6.358 ± 0.053 |
99.511 |
0.671 |
Table 10 Determination of Cu(II) ions in real samples using N2 nanocomposite
Sample |
Added volume from Cu(II) stock solution (1000 μg L−1) |
0 mL |
0.2 mL |
0.4 mL |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Sea water |
4.500 ± 0.124 |
— |
2.222 |
6.990 ± 0.188 |
97.795 |
2.169 |
9.540 ± 0.272 |
97.534 |
2.297 |
Tap water |
8.300 ± 0.152 |
— |
1.476 |
10.876 ± 0.141 |
99.438 |
1.043 |
13.500 ± 0.412 |
99.550 |
2.457 |
Fish muscles |
7.060 ± 0.225 |
— |
2.573 |
9.660 ± 0.299 |
99.579 |
2.493 |
12.260 ± 0.208 |
99.451 |
1.365 |
Blood |
1.082 ± 0.025 |
— |
1.894 |
3.600 ± 0.088 |
96.290 |
1.964 |
6.280 ± 0.195 |
98.413 |
2.495 |
Table 11 Determination of Cd(II) ions in real samples using N1 nanocomposite
Sample |
Added volume from Cd(II) stock solution (1000 μg L−1) |
0 mL |
0.2 mL |
0.4 mL |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Sea water |
0.184 ± 0.007 |
— |
2.977 |
2.720 ± 0.104 |
95.671 |
3.076 |
5.390 ± 0.092 |
98.213 |
1.376 |
Tap water |
0.146 ± 0.005 |
— |
2.837 |
2.754 ± 0.063 |
98.168 |
1.844 |
5.372 ± 0.103 |
98.560 |
1.549 |
Fish muscles |
21.100 ± 0.679 |
— |
2.596 |
23.400 ± 0.519 |
98.719 |
1.788 |
26.200 ± 0.555 |
99.646 |
1.707 |
Blood |
1.068 ± 0.037 |
— |
2.762 |
3.564 ± 0.119 |
95.685 |
2.696 |
6.348 ± 0.132 |
99.696 |
1.672 |
Table 12 Determination of Cd(II) ions in real samples using N2 nanocomposite
Sample |
Added volume from Cd(II) stock solution (1000 μg L−1) |
0 mL |
0.2 mL |
0.4 mL |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Found concentration (μg L−1) |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
Sea water |
0.171 ± 0.006 |
— |
2.905 |
2.740 ± 0.068 |
96.802 |
1.999 |
5.450 ± 0.088 |
99.534 |
1.297 |
Tap water |
0.157 ± 0.006 |
— |
2.848 |
2.774 ± 0.054 |
98.503 |
1.563 |
5.440 ± 0.142 |
99.612 |
2.096 |
Fish muscles |
21.600 ± 0.473 |
— |
1.763 |
24.000 ± 0.760 |
99.165 |
2.552 |
26.730 ± 0.890 |
99.774 |
2.683 |
Blood |
1.078 ± 0.038 |
— |
2.814 |
3.594 ± 0.089 |
96.232 |
2.002 |
6.334 ± 0.137 |
99.321 |
1.742 |
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
|
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022 |
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.