Correction: Recent advances and perspectives for solar-driven water splitting using particulate photocatalysts

Abstract

Correction for ‘Recent advances and perspectives for solar-driven water splitting using particulate photocatalysts’ by Xiaoping Tao et al., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2022, 51, 3561–3608, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs01182k.

---

The authors regret that there were some errors in the references in Tables 1 and 2 in the original article. The corrected Tables 1 and 2 are presented here, and the additional references which should have been included (ref. 299–317) are provided below.

Table 1 Representative particulate one-step overall water-splitting systems

Photocatalyst	Absorption range/nm	Cocatalyst	Efficiency	Ref.
Ultraviolet light
TiO2	<385 nm	Pt/RuO2	QE: 30 ± 10% at 310 nm	299
SrTiO3:Al	<390 nm	Rh/Cr2O3/CoOOH	AQE: 95.7% at 350 nm, 95.9% at 360 nm, 91.6% at 365 nm STH: 0.65%	179
La2Ti2O7:Ba	<385 nm	NiOx	QE: 35% (<360 nm)	300
Sr2Nb2O7	<300 nm	Ni	QE: 23% (<300 nm)	301
NaTaO3:La	<300 nm	NiO	AQE: 56% at 270 nm	84
Ga2O3:Zn	<280 nm	Rh2−yCryO3	AQY: 71% at 254 nm	302
Polytriazine imides	<400 nm	Pt/Co	AQY: 7.9% at 365 nm, 6.2% at 380 nm, 0.26% at 405 nm	268
Visible light
(Zn0.12Ga0.88)(N0.88O0.12)	<475 nm	Rh2−yCryO3	AQE: 5.9% at 420–440 nm	264
GaN:Mg/InGaN:Mg	<475 nm	Rh/Cr2O3	AQE: 12.3% at 400–475 nm, STH: 1.8%	303
ZrO2/TaON	<495 nm	RuOx/Cr2O3/IrO2	AQE: <0.1% at 420 nm	304
LaMg1/3Ta2/3O2N	<600 nm	Rh2−yCryO3/TiO2/SiO2	AQE: 0.18% at 440 ± 30 nm	243
Ta3N5	<590 nm	Rh/Cr2O3	AQE: 2.2% at 320 nm, 0.22% at 420 nm, 0.024% at 500 nm, STH: 0.014%	85
BiYWO6	<470 nm	RuO2	AQE: 0.17% at 420 nm	305
BiVO4:In,Mo	<496 nm	RuO2	AQE: 3.2% at 420–800 nm	306
Y2Ti2O5S2	<650 nm	Rh/Cr2O3/IrO2	AQE: 0.36% at 420 nm, 0.23% at 500, 0.05% at 600 nm, STH: 0.007%	50
g-C3N4	<440 nm	Pt/CoOx	AQE: 0.3% at 405 nm	267
g-C3N4(nanosheet)	<410 nm	Co1-phosphide	QE: 3.6% at 420 nm, 2.2% at 500 nm and 0.35% at 580 nm	307
CDots-C3N4	<620 nm		AQE: 16% at 420 nm, STH: 2%	308

---

Table 2 Representative particulate Z-scheme overall water-splitting systems

HEP	OEP	Electron mediator	Efficiency	Ref.
Soluble electron mediator
Pt/SrTiO3(Cr,Ta) (<700 nm)	PtOx/WO3 (<450 nm)	IO3^−/I^−	AQE: 0.1% at 420 nm	271
Pt/ZrO2/TaON (<500 nm)	PtOx/WO3 (<600 nm)	IO3^−/I^−	AQE: 6.3% at 420 nm	273
Pt/MgTa2O6−xNy/TaON (<570 nm)	PtOx/WO3 (<600 nm)	IO3^−/I^−	AQE: 6.8% at 420 nm	274
IrO2/Sm2Ti2S2O5 (<590 nm); Pt/La5Ti2CuS5O7 (<650 nm); Rh/La6Ti2S8O5 (<630 nm)	PtOx/H-Cs-WO3 (<450 nm)	I3^−/I^−	STH: 0.003%	309
Dye-adsorbed Pt/H4Nb6O17 (<700 nm)	IrO2/PtOx/WO3 (<450 nm)	I3^−/I^−	AQE: 0.05% at 480 nm	310
Ru/SrTiO3:Rh (<520 nm)	BiVO4 (<520 nm)	Fe^3+/Fe^2+	AQE: 4.2% at 420 nm, STH: 0.1%	311
Ru/SrTiO3:Rh (<520 nm)	Bi4NbO8Cl (<498 nm)	Fe^3+/Fe^2+	AQE: 0.4% at 420 nm	76
RhyCr2−yO3/ZrO2/TaON (<530 nm)	Ir-FeCoOx/BiVO4 (<530 nm)	[Fe(CN)6]^3−/4−	AQE: 12.3% at 420 ± 10 nm, STH: 0.6%	275 and 298
Pt/SrTiO3:Rh (<520 nm)	BiVO4 (<520 nm)	[Co(bpy)3]^3+/2+ or [Co(phen)3]^3+/2+	AQE: 2.1% at 420 nm	312
0.5 wt% Ru/SrTiO3:Rh (<520 nm)	Photosystem II (400–520 and 600–700 nm)	[Fe(CN)6]^3−/4−	STH: 0.012%	282 and 313
Ru/SrTiO3:Rh (<520nm)	PtOx/WO3 (<450 nm)	[SiW11O39Mn^III(H2O)]^5−/[SiW11O39Mn^II(H2O)]^6−	AQE: 0.24% at 400 nm (H2 evolution) AQE: 0.36% at 400 nm (O2 evolution)	314
Solid-state electron mediator
Ru/SrTiO3:Rh (<520 nm)	BiVO4 (<520 nm)	None	AQE: 1.7% at 420 nm, STH: 0.12%	277
Pt/g-C3N4(nanosheet) (<450 nm)	Co(OH)2/B doped g-C3N4(nanosheet) (<900 nm)	None	STH: 1.16%	276
Ru/SrTiO3:La,Rh (<520 nm)	CoOx/Ta3N5 (<600 nm)	Ir	AQE: 1.1% at 420 nm, STH: 0.037%	315
Ru/SrTiO3:Rh (<520 nm)	BiVO4 (<520 nm)	RGO	AQE: 1.03% at 420 nm	316
ZnRh2O4 (<1030 nm)	Bi4V2O11 (<750 nm)	Ag	AQE: ∼0.003% at 740 nm	317
Pt/TiO2/CdS/(ZnSe)0.5(CuGa2.5Se4.25)0.5 (<720 nm)	BiVO4:Mo (<520 nm)	Au	AQE: 1.5% at 420 nm	281

---

There was also a minor error in Fig. 3, where the vertical axis should have been labelled “Potential/vs. NHE (pH = 0)”. The corrected Fig. 3 is also presented here.

Fig. 3 Mechanism of photocatalytic water splitting on a semiconductor-based photocatalyst.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

References

299 D. Duonghong, E. Borgarello and M. Graetzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 4685–4690.

300 J. Kim, D. W. Hwang, H. G. Kim, S. W. Bae, J. S. Lee, W. Li and S. H. Oh, Top. Catal., 2005, 35, 295–303.

301 A. Kudo, H. Kato and S. Nakagawa, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 571-575.

302 Y. Sakata, T. Hayashi, R. Yasunaga, N. Yanaga and H. Imamura, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 12935–12938.

303 M. G. Kibria, F. A. Chowdhury, S. Zhao, B. AlOtaibi, M. L. Trudeau, H. Guo and Z. Mi, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 6797.

304 K. Maeda, D. Lu and K. Domen, Chem. – Eur. J., 2013, 19, 4986–4991.

305 H. Liu, J. Yuan, W. Shangguan and Y. Teraoka, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 8521–8523.

306 W. J. Jo, H. J. Kang, K.-J. Kong, Y. S. Lee, H. Park, Y. Lee, T. Buonassisi, K. K. Gleason and J. S. Lee, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2015, 112, 13774–13778.

307 W. Liu, L. Cao, W. Cheng, Y. Cao, X. Liu, W. Zhang, X. Mou, L. Jin, X. Zheng, W. Che, Q. Liu, T. Yao and S. Wei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 9312–9317.

308 Z. Kang, Science, 2015, 347, 970–974.

309 G. Ma, S. Chen, Y. Kuang, S. Akiyama, T. Hisatomi, M. Nakabayashi, N. Shibata, M. Katayama, T. Minegishi and K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2016, 7, 3892–3896.

310 R. Abe, K. Shinmei, N. Koumura, K. Hara and B. Ohtani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 16872–16884.

311 H. Kato, Y. Sasaki, N. Shirakura and A. Kudo, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 12327–12333.

312 Y. Sasaki, H. Kato and A. Kudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 5441–5449.

313 W. Wang, Z. Li, J. Chen and C. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 2605–2612.

314 K. Tsuji, O. Tomita, M. Higashi and R. Abe, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, 2201–2208.

315 Q. Wang, T. Hisatomi, S. S. K. Ma, Y. Li and K. Domen, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 4144–4150.

316 A. Iwase, Y. H. Ng, Y. Ishiguro, A. Kudo and R. Amal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 11054–11057.

317 R. Kobayashi, T. Takashima, S. Tanigawa, S. Takeuchi, B. Ohtani and H. Irie, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 27754–27760.

---