Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Investigation of plasma metabolomics and neurotransmitter dysfunction in the process of Alzheimer’s disease rat induced by amyloid beta 25-35

Mengying Weiab, Yuanyuan Liua, Zifeng Pib, Kexin Yuea, Shizhe Lic, Mingxin Hua, Zhiqiang Liub, Fengrui Songb and Zhongying Liu*a
aSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jilin University, 1266 Fujin Road, Changchun, 130021, China. E-mail: liuzy@jlu.edu.cn; Tel: +86 431 85619704
bNational Center for Mass Spectrometry in Changchun, Jilin Province Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Chemistry and Mass Spectrometry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China
cGuangdong Univ Technol, Inst Biomed & Pharmaceut Sci, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Received 9th February 2021 , Accepted 9th February 2021

First published on 15th February 2021


Abstract

Correction for ‘Investigation of plasma metabolomics and neurotransmitter dysfunction in the process of Alzheimer’s disease rat induced by amyloid beta 25-35’ by Mengying Wei et al., RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 18308–18319. DOI: 10.1039/C9RA00302A.


The authors regret that, due to personal negligence, Fig. 1d-NG-4 in this article was repeatedly uploaded as Fig. 1d-NG-2. The authors apologize to readers for this inaccuracy and the corrected figure is shown below. This correction does not affect the results, discussion or conclusion of the article.
image file: d1ra90081a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 The performance of spatial learning and memory in rats after 2, 4 and 8 weeks of modelling in the MWM test: (a) the escape latency during the 4 day training period, (b) times of crossing the original platform in the 120 s probe test, (c) trajectories of the last trial, (d) trajectories of rats from each group in (b). Notes: n = 10, per group; data are expressed as mean ± SEM, compared to NG by a t-test after the same week, ###P < 0.001, ##P < 0.01, #P < 0.05, compared to AD-2, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, compared to AD-4, &&&P < 0.001, &&P < 0.01, &P < 0.05.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021