Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and water

Tianxiang Guoab, Lingfeng Kongab, Junpeng Xuab, Yuhan Gengab, Runan Zhangab, Yuanfeng Panc and Huining Xiao*d
aHebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Power University, Baoding, 071003, PR China
bMOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, PR China
cSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, PR China
dDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton E3B 5A3, Canada. E-mail: hxiao@unb.ca

Received 21st May 2021 , Accepted 25th June 2021

First published on 16th July 2021


Abstract

This study focused on demonstrating the intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and water, with the aim to better understand the transfer of small molecules to β-cyclodextrin. The intermolecular interaction strength between β-cyclodextrin and water was analyzed using different methods such as the dynamic adsorption of water, the TG-DSC of β-cyclodextrin and molecular modeling employing MM2 force field calculations. The experiments for the adsorption of water on β-cyclodextrin was aimed to systematically investigate the adsorption characteristics, such as adsorption capacity, adsorption rate, adsorption heat and activation energy, influenced by the adsorption temperature and vapor pressure of water. The results indicated that the water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin is an exothermic process. The hysteresis loop type in the adsorption isotherms at multiple temperatures indicated that water adsorption is not purely a traditional physical adsorption due to the existence of structure effects such as the cavity effect and hydrogen bonding. The activation energy during water adsorption was 7.4 kJ mol−1. However, the activation energy during water desorption was in the range of 35–45 kJ mol−1, which decreased with an increase in the amount of water adsorbed. This indicated that water adsorption is much easier than water desorption from β-cyclodextrin and that water desorption is more difficult with a small amount of adsorbed water compared with a large amount of adsorbed water. Subsequently, the obtained average intermolecular interaction strength between β-cyclodextrin and water under the experimental conditions was 67.5 kJ mol−1 (water), which was verified by DSC.


1. Introduction

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are cyclic oligomers of D-(+)-glucopyranose units linked through α-1,4-glycoside bonding, which include α-cyclodextrin (six D-galactose groups), β-cyclodextrin (seven D-galactose groups) and γ-cyclodextrin (eight D-galactose groups).1 Considering the nontoxic effect and molecular recognition ability of CDs as functional compounds practically,2–5 they have been widely applied in many industries such as the food industry, environmental protection, biotechnology and cell biology.6 Among CDs, β-cyclodextrin is the most widely used cyclodextrin because of its hydrophilic exterior (primary and secondary hydroxyls) and hydrophobic molecular cavity, which can provide hydrophobic binding sites for inorganic ions and guest organic molecules7,8 by forming a relatively stable structure9,10 based on intermolecular interactions such as van der Waals force. Moreover, the hydrophilic exterior of its cavity makes β-cyclodextrin exhibit good interactions with hydrophilic substances, and thus it has been used in the fields of drug delivery, pollutant removal and synthesis of new materials.11–15 The role of water is important to accurately understand the transfer of small molecules to β-cyclodextrin and the intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and other species besides water. Therefore, it is necessary to accurately investigate the intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and water.16,17

To demonstrate the intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and water, the adsorption behaviors of water on β-cyclodextrin were systematically investigated, and the adsorption characteristics such as adsorption capacity, adsorption rate, equivalent adsorption heat and activation energy influenced by the adsorption temperature and vapor pressure of water were elucidated. The equivalent adsorption heat based on the Clausius–Clapeyron equation represents the average strength of the thermal effect under experimental conditions.18–22 However, water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin is a complex process.23,24 Although there are a few studies about the existing conditions of water inside the cyclodextrin molecule,25,26 such as seven molecules of water in the cyclodextrin cavity, the various thermodynamic and dynamic parameters such as the activation energy and interaction strength during water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin have been rarely reported. Herein, different methods including water dynamic adsorption, TG-DSC of β-cyclodextrin and molecular modeling employing MM2 force field calculations were used to investigate thermodynamic and dynamic parameters such as the activation energy of water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin and the interaction strength between β-cyclodextrin and water.

2. Methods

β-Cyclodextrin (BR) was purchased from Beijing Shuangxuan Microbe Culture Medium Products Factory and used for dynamic water adsorption. The water adsorption tests were carried out using the BSD-VS system (Beishide Instrument Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing). Considering water condensation under saturated humidity at a given temperature, 95% relative humidity was selected as the end pressure of adsorption. Therefore, the dynamic water adsorption was performed at a relative humidity of 10–95% at 283 K, 298 K and 313 K. Prior to the adsorption experiments, all the as-prepared β-cyclodextrin samples (50–100 mg) were dried at 473 K for 8 h.

To investigate the desorption of water from β-cyclodextrin, the dehydration process of β-cyclodextrin stored in the ambient environment was analyzed via TG-DSC using a Mettler LF/1100 (TA Instruments, Sweden) under nitrogen with a flow rate of 100 mL min−1 in the temperature range of 303 K to 473 K at a heating rate of 5 K min−1, 10 K min−1, 15 K min−1 and 20 K min−1. Below 473 K, β-cyclodextrin would not chemically decompose, and thus the dehydration process of β-cyclodextrin reflects the desorption of water from β-cyclodextrin. The dehydration of β-cyclodextrin at the heating rate of 5 K min−1 was performed four times. Then the dehydration rate was expressed as the first derivative of mass loss with temperature due to the linear relationship between temperature and time.

Molecular modeling employing MM2 force field calculations based on the ChemOffice suite of programs was performed to investigate the intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and water. The initial configuration of β-cyclodextrin came from the template database (supramolecules) of the ChemOffice suite of programs. Also, the optimum structure of the initial configuration based on the minimum energy optimization (minimum RMS gradient: 0.01) was used to theoretically investigate the intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and water. The molecular modeling employing MM2 force field calculations was related to the minimum energy and molecular dynamics.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Adsorption isotherms

The water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin in the pressure range of 0–8 kPa was measured at 283 K, 298 K and 313 K, and the results are presented in Fig. 1. As seen in Fig. 1(a), the water adsorption capacity increased with an increase in vapor pressure, whereas it increased with a decrease in the adsorption temperature. The water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin conformed to the type III adsorption isotherm. For instance, when the adsorption temperature was 283 K, the adsorption capacity for water was 5.7 mmol g−1 at the vapor pressure of 0.5 kPa, and then increased to 11.1 mmol g−1 at a vapor pressure of 1 kPa. However, when the vapor pressure was 1 kPa, it decreased to 3.8 mmol g−1 at 298 K and 1.5 mmol g−1 at 313 K. The increasing tendency of the adsorption capacity with an increase in vapor pressure indicates that the pressure exhibited a positive effect on the water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin. Also, an increase in pressure is beneficial for water uptake. Then, the decreasing tendency of the adsorption capacity with an increase in the adsorption temperature indicates that the adsorption of water on β-cyclodextrin is an exothermic process. The temperature exhibited a negative effect on water adsorption. Also, a decrease in temperature is conducive to water uptake.
 
(Δln[thin space (1/6-em)]PT)q = Q/RT2 (1)
where P represents the adsorption equilibrium pressure, T represents the adsorption temperature, Q represents the adsorption heat, R is the gas constant, and q is the amount of water adsorbed.

image file: d1ra03960a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Characteristics of water adsorption: capacity changes (a), isosteric heat (b) and adsorption isotherms (c).

Combining the Clausius–Clapeyron relation (1) with the ideal gas state equation, the isosteric heat of water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin was obtained, as shown in Fig. 1(b), which varied in the range of 40–53 kJ mol−1. Moreover, it depended on the amount of water adsorbed, showing a tendency of increasing firstly, and then decreasing with an increase in the amount of water adsorbed. The isosteric heat of more than 40 kJ mol−1 indicated that the water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin was different from the traditional physical adsorption with an isosteric heat below 20 kJ mol−1, which may be attributed to the existence of a structure effect such as hydrogen bonding due to the large amount of hydrophilic hydroxyl groups in β-cyclodextrin. In addition, as shown in Fig. 1(c), the adsorption curve is obviously inconsistent with the desorption curve at a given adsorption temperature, accompanied by an obvious hysteresis loop, regardless of the adsorption temperature. This may have resulted from the special molecular cavity structure of β-cyclodextrin. This phenomenon is reflected in the fact that water desorption from β-cyclodextrin was more difficult than water adsorption.

3.2 Adsorption rate

To investigate the rate of water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin, the changes in water adsorption vs. adsorption time at different adsorption temperatures and pressure (relative humidity) ranges were analyzed, and the results are shown in Fig. 2. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the amount of water adsorbed at given adsorption temperature such as 283 K exhibited a tendency of increasing rapidly at first, and then slowly increasing with an increase in adsorption time at a given pressure (relative humidity). The nonlinear relationship between the adsorption amount and adsorption time indicates that the adsorption rate, as determined from the slope of the adsorption amount vs. adsorption time, decreased with an increase in adsorption time at a given adsorption temperature and pressure (relative humidity). This is because the adsorption rate at a given adsorption temperature and pressure (relative humidity), which can be described by eqn (2) with condition (3), is affected by both the dynamic item kiPi and thermodynamic term (1 − Pi(q)/Pi).
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t1.tif(2)
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t2.tif(3)
where Pi(q) represents the adsorption equilibrium pressure with the adsorbed amount q, Pi represents the constant pressure of the adsorption stage i, Pi−1 represents the constant pressure of adsorption stage i − 1, and ki represents the rate constant of the adsorption stage i at a given adsorption temperature.

image file: d1ra03960a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Relationship between the adsorption amount and adsorption time: (a) adsorption capacity at 283 K and (b) adsorption rate.

When the adsorbed amount q increased, the equilibrium pressure Pi(q) increased from pressure Pi−1. In the initial adsorption stage i, the equilibrium pressure Pi(q) was close to pressure Pi−1, and thus the adsorption rate mainly depended on the dynamic item kiPi and was higher compared with the subsequent adsorption. In the final adsorption stage i, the equilibrium pressure Pi−1 was gradually close to pressure Pi, and thus the adsorption rate mainly depended on the thermodynamic term (1 − Pi(q)/Pi) and decreased with an increase in adsorption time until it was close to zero. To investigate the activation energy during water adsorption, the adsorption rate for a given pressure Pi at a given adsorption temperature was obtained according to the initial rate method, together with the driving force of PiPi−1 (eqn (4)). It was calculated using the slope of the adsorption amount vs. adsorption time based on the top 10 adsorption data. Also, the obtained adsorption rates are shown in Fig. 2(b).

 
image file: d1ra03960a-t3.tif(4)
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t4.tif(5)
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t5.tif(6)

As shown in Fig. 2(b), the obtained adsorption rate increased with an increase in adsorption temperature, regardless of the relative humidity range. Considering the unstable adsorption at high vapor pressure (relative humidity), the average adsorption rate under the relative humidity range of 10–60% was selected to calculate the adsorption rate, which was 1.35 × 10−2 mmol min−1 at 283 K, 3.25 × 10−2 mmol min−1 at 298 K and 4.68 × 10−2 mmol min−1 at 313 K, with the pressure driving force of 122.8 Pa, 316.9 Pa and 738.1 Pa, respectively. Then the adsorption rate constant ki at a given adsorption temperature was obtained from eqn (5). According to eqn (6), the activation energy was calculated based on the adsorption rate constants at different adsorption temperatures T1 and T2, and the results are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Calculation of activation energy
Temperature, K 283 298 313
Adsorption rate constant k, 10−5 mmol min−1 Pa 10.64 9.12 7.88
ln(k) −9.15 −9.30 −9.45
Apparent activation energy, kJ mol−1 7.4
Pre-exponential factor, mmol min−1 Pa 4.7 × 10−6
Square. R2 0.9999


As seen from Table 1, the apparent rate constant of water uptake decreased with an increase in the adsorption temperature, which changed from 10.64 × 10−5 mmol min−1 Pa at 283 K to 9.12 × 10−5 mmol min−1 Pa at 298 K and 7.88 × 10−5 mmol min−1 Pa at 313 K. Subsequently, according to eqn (6), the activation energy of water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin was obtained from the slope of ln[thin space (1/6-em)]k vs. 1/T, which was 7.4 kJ mol−1. The low activation energy indicates that water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin is easy.

3.3 Water desorption from β-cyclodextrin

To investigate the water desorption characteristics from β-cyclodextrin in the ambient environment, the thermogravimetric analysis of β-cyclodextrin was performed based on the TG tests in a heating rate range of 5–20 K min−1. The related results are presented in Fig. 3. According to the mass loss shown in Fig. 3(a), the water content of β-cyclodextrin between 308 K and 313 K varied in the range of 11.1–12.6% based on three parallel tests at a heating rate of 5 K min−1. The average water content was 12.0% with an error of 1%. According to the average water content of β-cyclodextrin, the mole n of water adsorbed by per mole of β-cyclodextrin could be obtained based on formula (7).
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t6.tif(7)
where w represented the water content of β-cyclodextrin.

image file: d1ra03960a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Mass loss of β-cyclodextrin at a heating rate of 5 K min−1 (a) and different heating rates (b).

According to formula (7), the obtained mole n of water adsorbed by per mole of β-cyclodextrin was 8.6 based on three parallel tests at a heating rate of 5 K min−1. The average end temperature for mass loss was considered as 385 K, with a mass change of less than 0.1% compared with the final mass of β-cyclodextrin. Considering the complete desorption of water, the heating time for the dehydration of β-cyclodextrin was determined to be at least 16 min when the heating rate was set at 5 K min−1.

To further reveal the characteristics of water desorption, the mass loss of β-cyclodextrin at different heating rates was analyzed based on Fig. 3(b). As seen in Fig. 3(b), the water content of β-cyclodextrin varied in the range of 11.8–13.2% based on four tests at heating rates of 5 K min−1, 10 K min−1, 15 K min−1 and 20K min−1, respectively. The average value of water content was 12.5% with an error of 1%. According to formula (6), the mole of water adsorbed by per mole of β-cyclodextrin was considered to be 9. Therefore, the number of moles of water adsorbed by per mole of β-cyclodextrin in the ambient environment was between 8.5 and 9.

Meanwhile, as also shown in Fig. 3(b), when the heating rates were 5 K min−1, 10 K min−1, 15 K min−1 and 20 K min−1, the end temperatures were determined to be 385 K, 406 K, 420 K and 425 K, respectively. The end temperature increased with an increase in heating rate, accompanied by a decrease in the heating time for the complete desorption of water, which was 16.8 min, 9.6 min, 7.4 min and 6.8 min, respectively. This indicates that the dehydration process of β-cyclodextrin needed more time at a relatively low heating rate for the complete removal of water from β-cyclodextrin.

3.4 Desorption rate

As also seen in Fig. 3, based on the slope of mass loss via temperature, β-cyclodextrin seemed to exhibit a lower desorption rate of water at the initial and final time than that at the middle time during the dehydration process, indicating that the desorption rate of water from β-cyclodextrin was different at different temperatures and there was a maximum mass loss rate existing during the dehydration process of β-cyclodextrin. Thus, to verify this phenomenon, Fig. 4 presents the mass loss rates of β-cyclodextrin at the same heating rate and different heating rates. As shown in Fig. 4(a), for a given heating rate, the mass loss rate of β-cyclodextrin exhibited an increasing tendency initially, and then decreased with an increase in temperature. Also, all the samples had one almost identical peak of mass loss rate at the heating rate of 5 K min−1, and the observed peak temperatures with maximum mass loss rate of three parallel samples were almost coincident, which was about 365 K, with an error of ±0.7 K. As seen in Fig. 4(b), the observed peak value of mass loss rate decreased when the heating rate increased, which was 0.41%/K at a heating rate of 5 K min−1, 0.35%/K at a heating rate of 10 K min−1, 0.31%/K at a heating rate of 15 K min−1 and 0.29%/K at a heating rate of 20 K min−1, with the peak temperatures at 365 K (92 °C), 379 K (106 °C), 389 K (116 °C) and 390 K (117 °C), respectively.
image file: d1ra03960a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Mass loss rate curves of β-cyclodextrin at the heating rate of 5 K min−1 (a) and different heating rates (b).

3.5 Activation energy of water desorption

To determine the activation energy of water desorption from β-cyclodextrin, the related mass loss was redefined as eqn (8) and the related mass loss rate was defined as eqn (9). Then the activation energy was obtained according to eqn (10) from the curve slope of ln(dα/dt) vs. 1/T based on the isoconversion method. The results are shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the mass loss rate dα/dt at a given heating rate exhibited a trend of increasing initially, and then decreased with an increase in the conversion rate α. At given conversion rate α, the mass loss rate dα/dt increased with an increase in the heating rate, accompanied by an increase in temperature. Then the maximum mass loss rate appeared when the conversion rate α was near 0.7. According to eqn (10), the obtained activation energy of water desorption from β-cyclodextrin varied in the range of 37–55 kJ mol−1. This is much higher than that of the adsorption stage (7.4 kJ mol−1), which indicates that water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin is much easier than water desorption.
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t7.tif(8)
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t8.tif(9)
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t9.tif(10)
Table 2 Calculated activation energy
α Heating rate, K min−1 Fitting parameters
5 10 15 20 Activation energy E, kJ mol−1 ln(Af(α)) R2
0.1 T, K 329.3 336.5 350.0 348.3 48.3 5.6 0.9196
dα/dt, s−1 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.7
0.2 T, K 340.9 350.5 363.0 363.0 54.5 7.6 0.9391
dα/dt, s−1 1.0 1.5 2.6 3.6
0.3 T, K 347.6 359.5 370.5 371.7 49.5 5.9 0.9760
dα/dt, s−1 1.4 2.4 3.7 4.6
0.4 T, K 352.6 365.5 376.5 377.7 47.8 5.4 0.9825
dα/dt, s−1 1.8 3.1 4.8 5.8
0.5 T, K 356.8 370.0 381.5 383.0 46.4 4.9 0.9835
dα/dt, s−1 2.2 3.8 5.7 7.0
0.6 T, K 360.5 374.5 385.5 387.7 44.9 4.4 0.9881
dα/dt, s−1 2.6 4.3 6.3 7.7
0.7 T, K 363.4 378.0 389.5 391.7 42.9 3.7 0.9900
dα/dt, s−1 2.7 4.5 6.5 7.8
0.8 T, K 366.8 382.0 393.5 396.3 39.0 2.2 0.9922
dα/dt, s−1 2.6 4.2 5.8 7.0
0.9 T, K 370.9 386.5 398.5 402.3 37.4 1.1 0.9869
dα/dt, s−1 1.7 3.0 3.8 4.4


3.6 Enthalpy change of water desorption

To determine the enthalpy change of water desorption from β-cyclodextrin, DSC tests at different heating rates were performed, and the results are shown in Fig. 5. As shown in Fig. 5, based on the negative value, the heat flow exhibited a trend of decreasing initially, and then increased with time, indicating that the dehydration process of the sample is an endothermic process. The absolute value of heat flow seemed to vary with the change of mass loss rate. The enthalpy change of dehydration could be calculated using eqn (11). Considering the base line modification, according to eqn (11), the enthalpy change of water desorption from β-cyclodextrin was determined to be in the range of 62.9–71.6 kJ mol−1 (water), with an average value of 67.5 kJ mol−1 (water) and maximum error of 6 kJ mol−1 (water).
 
image file: d1ra03960a-t10.tif(11)

image file: d1ra03960a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Heat flow of water desorption from β-cyclodextrin at different heating rates.

3.7 Model validation

To verify whether the above energy calculation was consistent with the expectation, MM2 force field calculations based on the ChemOffice suite of programs were performed. Firstly, the spatial configuration of β-cyclodextrin, as shown in Fig. 6(a) was set and the static energy was obtained by MM2 force field calculation.28,29 During the simulation, molecular dynamics and minimal energy model fitting were used to check whether a certain water molecule could enter the cyclodextrin cavity based on the modification of the relative positions between cyclodextrin and the water molecules. Then the energy change was obtained by subtracting the sum of the static energy of nine molecules of water and one β-cyclodextrin molecule with the optimized initial configuration shown in section 2. When the nine water molecules contacted with the cavity side of β-cyclodextrin, as shown in Fig. 6(b), some of the water molecules entered the cavity and others stayed on the cavity side of β-cyclodextrin27 based on molecular dynamics (step interval: 2.0 fs, frame interval: 10 fs, terminate after 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 steps, heating/cooling rate: 1.0 kcal per atom per ps, and target: 313 Kelvin) six times. For these six times, the optimized total energy based on the minimum energy model fitting after molecular dynamics varied in the range of −67.1 to −71.9 kJ mol−1. When the nine water molecules contacted with the cavity toroid section of β-cyclodextrin, as shown in Fig. 6(c), the optimized total energy based on minimal energy model fitting after molecular dynamics varied in the range of −72.7 to −75.9 kJ mol−1, together with the spatial configurations shown in Fig. 6(e). Compared with the enthalpy change of 62.9–71.6 kJ mol−1 (water) during dehydration in section 3.6, it can be concluded that most water molecules contacted and interacted with β-cyclodextrin from its cavity side. Then these water molecules may play act as a bridge among the β-cyclodextrin molecules.
image file: d1ra03960a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Spatial configuration during molecular dynamics: (a) β-cyclodextrin, (b) initial configuration of β-cyclodextrin with nine water molecules on the cavity side, (c) initial configuration of β-cyclodextrin with nine water molecules inside the cavity, and (d) and (e) spatial configurations after molecular dynamics simulation.

To verify this, the X-ray diffractions of β-cyclodextrin before and after water desorption were obtained, as shown in Fig. 7, where in the XRD pattern, the peak at 2θ (10.8) disappeared after water desorption. Meanwhile, the intensity of the peak at 2θ (12.7) weakened and shifted after water desorption. This indicates that the water molecules should participate in the formation of the planar structure of β-cyclodextrin.


image file: d1ra03960a-f7.tif
Fig. 7 XRD patterns of β-cyclodextrin before and after water desorption.

4. Conclusions

The hygroscopicity of β-cyclodextrin was investigated based on the dynamic adsorption method, TG-DSC analysis, and molecular dynamic simulation. The findings led to the comprehensive analysis of the adsorption characteristics of water on β-cyclodextrin. The results demonstrated that the system state of water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin depends on the amount of water adsorbed besides the adsorption temperature and vapor pressure of water, and the interaction between β-cyclodextrin and water is heterogeneous with an increase in the amount of water adsorbed or desorbed. Water adsorption on β-cyclodextrin is much easier than water desorption. Some interesting phenomena about the intermolecular interactions between β-cyclodextrin and water such as the adsorption rate, adsorption heat, activation energy and enthalpy change were found, which have rarely been reported before.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant #: B2021502007), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant #: 2184123), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China (Grant #:2019MS107, 2019MS095), National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Grant #: 20182084), NSF China (Grant #: 21466005), and NSERC Canada.

References

  1. X. M. Ji, Y. Liu, C. T. Su and M. Q. Zhao, Conformation of ionone cyclodextrin inclusion structure and study of reaction thermodynamics, Chin. Tob. Sci., 2010, 31, 80–83 Search PubMed.
  2. A. P. Sherje, B. R. Dravyakar, D. Kadam and M. Jadhav, Cyclodextrin-based nanosponges: a critical review, Carbohydr. Polym., 2017, 173, 37–49 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. Y. J. Tang, B. J. Shen, B. Q. Huang, Z. M. Zhan and Z. L. Xu, High permselectivity thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes with 3D microstructure fabricated by incorporation of beta cyclodextrin, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2019, 9, 115718 CrossRef.
  4. E. Fliszár-Nyúl, B. Lemli, S. Kunsági-Máté, L. Szente and M. Poór, Cyclodextrins Can Entrap Zearalenone-14-Glucoside: Interaction of the Masked Mycotoxin with Cyclodextrins and Cyclodextrin Bead Polymer, Biomolecules, 2019, 9, 354–428 CrossRef PubMed.
  5. R. P. Erickson and I. A. Borbon, Co-treatment with probucol does not improve lung pathology in hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin-treated Npc1/mice, J. Appl. Genet., 2019, 60, 175–178 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. E. M. M. Delvalle, Cyclodextrins and their uses: are view, Process Biochem., 2004, 39, 1033–1046 CrossRef CAS.
  7. K. Yuichiro, N. Yukie, Y. Zheng, T. Yoshinori, Y. Hiroyasu and H. Akira, Control of the threading ratio of cyclic molecules in polyrotaxanes consisting of poly(ethylene glycol) and α-cyclodextrins, Polymer, 2019, 5, 51–54 Search PubMed.
  8. M. T. Sikdera, M. M. Rahman, M. Jakariya, T. Hosokawa, M. Kurasaki and T. Saito, Remediation of water pollution with native cyclodextrins and modified cyclodextrins: a comparative overview and perspectives, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 355, 920–941 CrossRef.
  9. N. B. Li, H. Q. Luo and S. P. Liu, Resonance Rayleigh scattering study of the inclusion complexation of chloramphenicol with β-cyclodextrin, Talanta, 2005, 66, 495–500 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. W. B. Fan, Y. D. Xu, Z. Li and Q. Li, Folic acid-modified β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles as drug delivery to load DOX for liver cancer therapeutics, Soft Mater., 2019, 4, 437–447 CrossRef.
  11. M. Deng, S. Li, L. Cai and X. Guo, Preparation of a hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin functionalized monolithic column by one-pot sequential reaction and its application for capillary electrochromatographic enantiomer separation, J. Chromatogr. A, 2019, 1063, 269–277 CrossRef PubMed.
  12. H. Wang, X. Zhang, B. Yu, X. Peng, A. Wang, D. Zhao, D. Pang, H. OuYang and X. Tang, Cyclodextrin ameliorates the progression of atherosclerosis via increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma levels and anti-inflammatory effects in rabbits, J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 2019, 73, 334–342 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. M. B. Wei, X. Yang, P. Watson, F. Yang and H. Liu, A cyclodextrin polymer membrane-based passive sampler for measuring triclocarban, triclosan and methyl triclosan in rivers, Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 648, 109–115 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. G. Floresta and A. Rescifina, Metyrapone-β-cyclodextrin supramolecular interactions inferred by complementary spectroscopic/spectrometric and computational studies, J. Mol. Struct., 2019, 1176, 815–824 CrossRef CAS.
  15. X. Y. Du, K. Ma, R. Cheng, X. J. She, Y. W. Zhang, C. F. Wang and S. Chen, Host–Guest Supramolecular Assembly Directing Beta-Cyclodextrin Based Nanocrystals towards Their Robust Performances, J. Hazard. Mater., 2018, 361, 329–337 CrossRef PubMed.
  16. K. Atul, D. T. Vishwa and K. Promod, β-Cyclodextrin catalysed synthesis of tryptanthrin in watert, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 51–54 RSC.
  17. K. Vanessa and R. S. Andreea, Imidazolium-functionalized β-cyclodextrin as a highly recyclable multifunctional ligand in watert, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 3117–3124 RSC.
  18. N. A. Rashidi, S. Yusup and A. Borhan, Isotherm and thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide on activated carbon, Procedia Eng., 2016, 148, 630–637 CrossRef CAS.
  19. D. Tiwari, H. Bhunia and P. K. Bajpai, Urea-formaldehyde derived porous carbons for adsorption of CO2, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 111842–111855 RSC.
  20. D. Tiwari, H. Bhunia and P. K. Bajpai, Development of chemically activated N-enriched carbon adsorbents from urea-formaldehyde resin for CO2 adsorption: kinetics, isotherm, and thermodynamics, J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 4, 218–579 Search PubMed.
  21. P. Ammendola, F. Raganati and R. Chirone, Kinetic study and breakthrough analysis of the hybrid physical/chemical CO2 adsorption/desorption behavior of a magnetite-based sorbent, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 372, 526–535 CrossRef.
  22. T. X. Guo, N. Ma, Y. F. Pan, A. H. Bedane, H. N. Xiao, M. Eić and Y. R. Du, Characteristics of CO2 adsorption on biochar derived from biomass pyrolysis in molten salt, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2018, 96, 2352–2360 CrossRef CAS.
  23. V. Rizzi, J. Gubitosa, R. Signorile, P. Fini, C. Cecone, A. Matencio, F. Trotta and P. Cosma, Cyclodextrin nanosponges as adsorbent material to remove hazardous pollutants from water: the case of ciprofloxacin, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 411, 128514–128522 CrossRef CAS.
  24. N. Kania, S. Rio, E. Monflier and A. Ponchel, Cyclodextrins adsorbed onto activated carbons: preparation, characterization, and effect on the dispersibility of the particles in water, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2012, 317, 89–100 CrossRef PubMed.
  25. L. Lawtrakul, H. Viernstein and P. Wolschann, Molecular dynamics simulations of β-cyclodextrin in aqueous solution, Int. J. Pharm., 2003, 256, 33–41 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. T. Fuat, H. Tibor and S. Gyorgy, Scavenging organic micropollutants from water with nanofibrous hypercrosslinked cyclodextrin membranes derived from green resources, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 419, 217–228 Search PubMed.
  27. V. Zabel, W. Saenger and S. A. Mason, Neutron diffraction study of the hydrogen bonding in β-cyclodextrin undecahydrate at 120 K: from dynamic flip-flops to static homodromic chains, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 3664–3673 CrossRef CAS.
  28. S. M. H. Sanad and M. S. M. Ahmed, Regioselective synthesis and theoretical calculations of bis(pyrido[2′,3′:3,4]pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines) linked to benzofuran units via piperazine spacer: a DFT, MM2, and MMFF94 study, J. Mol. Struct., 2021, 1243, 130802 CrossRef.
  29. D. R. Thandra, R. R. Bojja and R. Allikayala, Synthesis, spectral studies, molecular structure determination by single crystal X-ray diffraction of (E)-1-(((3-fluoro-4-morpholinophenyl)imino)methyl)napthalen-2-ol and computational studies by Austin model-1(AM1), MM2 and DFT/B3LYP,SN, Appl. Sci., 2020, 2, 1765 CAS.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021