Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Measured and simulated thermoelectric properties of FeAs2−xSex (x = 0.30–1.0): from marcasite to arsenopyrite structure
Christopher J.
Perez
a,
Kasey P.
Devlin
a,
Callista M.
Skaggs
b,
Xiaoyan
Tan
*bc,
Corey E.
Frank
c,
Jackson R.
Badger
a,
Chang-Jong
Kang
d,
Thomas J.
Emge
c,
Susan M.
Kauzlarich
a,
Valentin
Taufour
e,
Gabriel
Kotliar
d,
Saul H.
Lapidus
f and
Martha
Greenblatt
*c
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA
bDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA. E-mail: xtan6@gmu.edu
cDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA. E-mail: greenbla@chem.rutgers.edu
dDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
eDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA
fAdvanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
First published on 26th April 2021
Abstract
Correction for ‘Measured and simulated thermoelectric properties of FeAs2−xSex (x = 0.30–1.0): from marcasite to arsenopyrite structure’ by Christopher J. Perez et al., Mater. Adv., 2020, 1, 1390–1398, DOI: 10.1039/D0MA00371A.
The authors regret that there was an error in the original manuscript. A decimal place was missing from the plot of the calculated zT value of the FeAs1.15Se0.85 sample (denoted as red dots in Fig. 6D). The corrected figure is given below:
 | ||
| Fig. 6 Total thermal conductivity (κtot) given as symbols and lattice thermal conductivity (κl ) provided as dashes (A), resistivity (B), Seebeck coefficient (C), and zT (D) measured on sintered polycrystalline pellets of FeAs2−xSex (x = 0.3, 0.75, 0.85, 1.0). | ||
As a result of this error, several sentences in the article also need to be updated as follows.
In the final sentence of the abstract, “ x = 0.85” should be “ x = 0.3”.
In the final sentence of section 3.5, “ x = 0.85” should be “x = 0.3”, and “zT = 0.06” should be “zT = 0.03”.
In the conclusions, the phrase “…the x = 0.85 has the best zT of 0.06 at 475 K.” should be “…the x = 0.3 has the best zT of 0.03 at 475 K.”
The overall results, discussion and conclusions presented in this article are not affected by this change.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |