Jinggong
Guo‡
a,
Shan
Shen‡
bc,
Xiao
Zhang
d,
Guoying
Wang
e,
Yiqing
Lu
f,
Xiping
Liu
b,
Shuyun
Wang
b,
Qin
Li
b,
Yue
Cong
*b and
Bingyang
Shi
*eg
aState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
bInstitute of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Henan University, Kaifeng, China. E-mail: congyue1027@163.com; Fax: +86-371-2388 0680; Tel: +86-371-23880680
cLudong Hospital, Yantai, China
dThe Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine and Immuno-Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
eFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. E-mail: bingyang.shi@mq.edu.au; Fax: +86-371-2388 7799; Tel: +86-371-2388 7799
fCentre for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
gInternational Joint Center for Biomedical Innovation, College of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
First published on 16th November 2020
Oxidative stress plays a central role in the common pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. Antioxidant therapy has been suggested for the prevention and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Compounds derived from natural sources may offer the potential for new treatment options. Semen Celosiae is a traditional Chinese edible herbal medicine with a long history in China and exhibits wide-reaching biological activities such as hepatoprotective, anti-tumor, anti-diarrheal, anti-diabetic, anti-oxidant, etc. In this study, nine saponins and two phenylacetonitrile glycosides were isolated from Semen Celosiae and their structures were identified using ESI-MS and NMR techniques. Among them, compounds 1 and 2 have not been previously reported. The total concentrations of the five triterpenoid saponins and the two phenylacetonitrile glycosides were 3.348 mg g−1 and 0.187 mg g−1, respectively, suggesting that Semen Celosiae is a novel viable source of the two kinds of compounds. These compounds were observed to significantly attenuate t-BHP-induced neuronal damage by effectively enhancing cell viability and decreasing reactive oxygen species generation and cell apoptosis rate in NSC-34 cells. Furthermore, compounds 1 and 7 reduced the ratios of cleaved caspase-3: caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-7: caspase-7 and the level of cytochrome C, while they increased the levels of SOD1 and Beclin 1. These findings suggest that compounds 1–11 are potent inhibitors of neuron injury elicited by t-BHP, possibly via inhibition of oxidative stress and apoptosis, and activation of autophagy; therefore they may be valuable leads for future therapeutic development.
Celosia argentea L., an annual herb, belongs to the Amaranthaceae family and its mature seeds, namely Semen Celosiae, are commonly called “Qingxiangzi” in Chinese. As a traditional Chinese edible herbal medicine, Semen Celosiae is included in Chinese Pharmacopeia (2020 Edition) and is frequently used for treating ulcers, liver-heat, red eye, blurred vision, dizzy spells, etc. Modern pharmacological studies manifested that Semen Celosiae exhibits hepatoprotective, anti-infection, anti-tumor, anti-diarrheal, anti-diabetic, and anti-oxidative activities.3,4 It is worth noting that Semen Celosiae can be used as both food and medicine due to its high nutritive value.5 Recently, with the increasing extensive studies on the chemical constituents of Semen Celosiae, multiple classes of chemical constituents have been isolated and identified in different investigations, including oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins, steroidal saponins, peptides, phenols, fatty acids, etc.
According to the report in “Ben Cao Gang Mu”, a Chinese herbal and medicinal classic, Semen Celosiae was described to demonstrate a protective effect on the brain. Whether this property has therapeutic benefits in neurodegenerative disorders or not requires further verification. In recent years, some studies have confirmed that oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins acted as protective agents in neurodegenerative diseases.6–8 As such, the present work aimed to extend this finding to Semen Celosiae by preparatively separating active compounds to determine the concentrations of these main constituents in this species as well as using tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BHP) to induce oxidative stress and mimic oxidative neurotoxicity in vitro.9 On this basis, the present work deeply investigated the protective effect of these compounds on t-BHP-induced neuronal damage in NSC-34 cells and the possible underlying mechanisms. Our study may provide the scientific basis for the development and effective use of Semen Celosiae against neurodegenerative diseases.
:
100 → 20
:
80 → 60
:
40 → 100
:
0) to provide three fractions: A (20% EtOH elution), B (60% EtOH elution), and C (100% EtOH elution). Fr. A (31 g) was separated over a silica-gel column with CH2Cl2–MeOH (10
:
1 → 8
:
1) to obtain subfr. A-1 (CH2Cl2–MeOH 8
:
1 elution). Subfr. A-1 was then purified by semi-preparative RP-HPLC with CH3OH–H2O (20
:
80, flow rate: 6 mL min−1) to yield compound 10 (14 mg, TR 20 min) and compound 2 (10 mg, TR 24 min). Fr. B (73 g) was then subjected to MCI GEL CHP20 column chromatography with a gradient mixture of MeOH–H2O (15
:
85 → 40
:
60 → 50
:
50 → 60
:
40 → 100
:
0) to provide five subfractions: B-1 (15% MeOH elution), B-2 (40% MeOH elution), B-3 (50% MeOH elution), B-4 (60% MeOH elution), and B-5 (100% MeOH elution). Subfr. B-2 was further separated on an ODS silica gel column with MeOH–H2O (30
:
70) to obtain compound 7 (27 mg). Subfr. B-3 was further separated on the ODS silica gel column with MeOH–H2O (40
:
60) to obtain compound 3 (56 mg), compound 5 (31 mg), and compound 6 (43 mg). Subfr. B-4 was further separated on the ODS silica gel column with MeOH–H2O (45
:
55) to yield compound 8 (39 mg) and compound 9 (37 mg). Subfr. B-5 was further separated on a silica gel column with CH2Cl2–MeOH (25
:
1) to obtain compound 4 (20 mg) and with CH2Cl2–MeOH (5
:
1) to obtain compound 1 (17 mg) and compound 11 (25 mg).
ε): 210 (2.02) nm; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 826.4575 ([M + NH4]+, calculated for 826.4584) and 831.4112 ([M + Na]+, calculated for 831.4137).
| Position | δ C | δ H | Position | δ C | δ H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44.3 | 2.10(dd, J = 10.8, 2.8 Hz), 1.18(m) | 22 | 33.3 | 1.23(m), 0.89(m) |
| 2 | 70.6 | 4.24(br.d, J = 3.2 Hz) | 23 | 208.8 | 9.44(s) |
| 3 | 83.8 | 3.85(d, J = 4.0 Hz) | 24 | 11.7 | 1.32(s) |
| 4 | 55.0 | 25 | 17.1 | 1.28(s) | |
| 5 | 49.3 | 1.36(m) | 26 | 17.8 | 0.81(s) |
| 6 | 21.1 | 158(m), 0.93(m) | 27 | 26.5 | 1.16(s) |
| 7 | 33.8 | 1.67(m), 1.50(m) | 28 | 181.8 | |
| 8 | 40.9 | 29 | 33.6 | 0.89(s) | |
| 9 | 49.0 | 1.62(m) | 30 | 24.0 | 0.92(s) |
| 10 | 37.0 | GlcA-1 | 104.6 | 4.38(d, J = 8.0 Hz) | |
| 11 | 24.0 | 1.51(m), 1.42(m) | GlcA-2 | 74.1 | 3.40(d, J = 8.0 Hz) |
| 12 | 123.4 | 5.24(br.s) | GlcA-3 | 85.9 | 3.50(m) |
| 13 | 145.3 | GlcA-4 | 71.5 | 3.56(m) | |
| 14 | 43.1 | GlcA-5 | 76.1 | 3.89(m) | |
| 15 | 28.7 | 171(m), 1.01(m) | GlcA-6 | 171.1 | |
| 16 | 24.6 | 2.03(m), 1.93(m) | –OCH3 | 53.0 | 3.75(s) |
| 17 | 47.6 | Xyl-1 | 105.7 | 4.50(d, J = 7.6 Hz) | |
| 18 | 42.8 | 2.83(dd, J = 14.0, 3.5) | Xyl-2 | 75.2 | 3.17(m) |
| 19 | 47.2 | 1.56(m), 1.10(m) | Xyl-3 | 77.5 | 3.41(m) |
| 20 | 31.6 | Xyl-4 | 70.6 | 3.46(m) | |
| 21 | 34.9 | 1.19(m), 1.36(m) | Xyl-5 | 67.1 | 3.88(m), 3.20(m) |
ε): 222 (4.25) nm, 275 (2.15) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3500–3200, 2923, 2255, 1613, 1512, 1236 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HR-ESI-MS m/z 440.1546 ([M − H]−, calculated for 440.1562), 476.1310 ([M + Cl]−, calculated for 476.1318) and 486.1600 ([M + HCOOH − H]−, calculated for 486.1617).
| Position | δ C | δ H | Position | δ C | δ H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 126.0 | Glc-1 | 102.2 | 4.88(d, J = 7.6 Hz) | |
| 2 | 130.3 | 7.32(d, J = 8.4 Hz) | Glc-2 | 74.8 | 3.48(m) |
| 3 | 118.3 | 7.12(d, J = 8.4 Hz) | Glc-3 | 77.9 | 3.47(m) |
| 4 | 158.6 | Glc-4 | 71.5 | 3.39(m) | |
| 5 | 118.3 | 7.12(d, J = 8.4 Hz) | Glc-5 | 76.9 | 3.59(m) |
| 6 | 130.3 | 7.32(d, J = 8.4 Hz) | Glc-6 | 67.8 | 4.02(d, J = 9.6 Hz) |
| 3.61(m) | |||||
| 7 | 22.7 | 3.85(s) | Rha-1 | 102.1 | 4.72(br.d, J = 1.2 Hz) |
| 8 | 119.9 | Rha-2 | 72.3 | 3.71(dd, J = 3.2, 9.6 Hz) | |
| Rha-3 | 72.1 | 3.85(m) | |||
| Rha-4 | 73.9 | 3.38(m) | |||
| Rha-5 | 69.8 | 3.67(s) | |||
| Rha-6 | 17.9 | 1.21(d, J = 6.5 Hz) |
:
74 v/v −35
:
65 (0–60 min) run at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The UV detection wavelength was set to 203 nm based on the result of ultraviolet full-wavelength scan. The injection volume was 10 μL. All 5 peaks were identified by comparing their retention times with those of the isolated compounds 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9.
The HPLC linear gradient profile for compounds 2 and 10 was as follows: acetonitrile
:
water 7
:
93 v/v run at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The UV detection wavelength was set to 220 nm based on the result of ultraviolet full-wavelength scan. The injection volume used was 10 μL. The 2 peaks were identified by comparing their retention times with those of the isolated compounds 2 and 10.
The dried Semen Celosiae was ground into powder and sized by passing it through a 60 mesh. 1 g of the powder was added to 10 mL of a 50% methanol–water mixture held in an Erlenmeyer flask with a stopper and then weighed. The powder was ultrasonically extracted using a KQ 3200 apparatus (Kunshan Ultrasonic Instrument Co., China) for 30 min at 25 °C, weighed to add weight loss, and mixed with the 50% methanol–water mixture. The Erlenmeyer flask was placed on the bench for 10 min to settle. The mixture was then filtered, concentrated, and set the volume to a 1 mL volumetric flask with 50% methanol–water mixture. The sample was then filtered through a 0.22 μm microporous membrane for its analysis by LC. Standard stock solutions of analytes were respectively prepared with the 50% methanol–water mixture. Calibration curves were generated by diluting the standard stock solutions to form a series of solutions at appropriate concentrations. The precision of the dilutes was evaluated with variations in the standard mixed solution. The stability and repeatability were tested using the same sample, and its accuracy was evaluated by running recovery tests.
The stock solutions of compounds 1–11 were dissolved at 10 mM in water or water containing 20% DMSO and stored at −30 °C. Before the experiment, the stock solutions were diluted with DMEM and stored at 4 °C. NSC-34 cells were pretreated with compounds 1–11 and vitamin E (Ve) for 24 h before exposure to t-BHP in every experiment. Cells treated with 100 μM Ve were regarded as the positive control. Cells treated with 90 μM t-BHP alone were used as the negative control. All cell culture assays were repeated three times.
For cellular imaging, NSC-34 cells were seeded at a concentration of 4 × 104 cells per well into 24-well plates containing glass slide covers and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h by following the above-mentioned procedure. 5 μM CellROX reagent was added to each well and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by washing with PBS (×2). Subsequently, the cells were fixed with a 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 15 min followed by washing with PBS (×2) and then stained with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min at room temperature. Then the cells were washed twice with PBS and VECTASHIELD mounting medium was added. The cells were imaged with a Zeiss LSM 880 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, Germany).
000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration was determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit following the manufacturer's guide. Protein was separated on 12% SDSPAGE gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking for 1 h, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies (rabbit, 1
:
1000, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) at 4 °C overnight, washed three times with TBST, incubated with the secondary antibody (anti-rabbit, 1
:
5000, LI-COR, USA) for 1 h, and re-washed three times with TBST. The protein band was measured using an ODYSSEY CLx Infrared imaging system (LI-COR, USA), and the results were visualized using Image Studio Lite 5.2.
Compound 1 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was C42H64O15 as determined by HR-ESI-MS ions at m/z 826.4575 ([M + NH4]+, C42H68O15N calculated for 826.4584, 1.1 ppm) and 831.4112 ([M + Na]+, C42H64O15Na calculated for 831.4137, 3.0 ppm). The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 1 exhibited one aldehyde proton signal at δ 9.44 (1H, s, H-23), two anomeric proton signals at δ 4.50 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-Xyl-1) and 4.38 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-GlcA-1), one olefinic proton signal at δ 5.24 (1H, br.s, H-12), one methoxy proton signal at δ 3.75 (s, OCH3) and six methyl proton signals at δ 0.81 (3H, s, CH3-29), 0.89 (3H, s, CH3-30), 0.93 (3H, s, CH3-26), 1.16 (3H, s, CH3-27), 1.28 (3H, s, CH3-25), and 1.32 (3H, s, CH3-24). The 13C NMR spectrum contained 42 signals, which included three carbonyl carbon signals at δ 208.8 (C-23), 181.8 (C-28), and 171.1 (C-GlcA-6), two olefinic carbon signals at δ 145.3 (C-13) and 123.4 (C-12), one methoxy carbon signal at δ 53.0 and two anomeric carbon signals at δ 105.7 (C-Xyl-1) and 104.6 (C-GlcA-1), revealing that compound 1 contained two sugar units. The β-configurations of D-glucuronic acid and D-xylose were determined by the J1,2 values of 7.8 Hz and 7.6 Hz, respectively.12,13 A comparison of the 13C NMR data of 1 with those of celosin L isolated from Semen celosiae showed that the structure of 1 was nearly identical to that of celosin L, except for an additional methoxy signal as well as α-orientations of the substituents at 2,3-position of compound 1.14,15 A combined analysis of the 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HSQC, and HMBC spectra showed that the methoxy signal was attached to C-GlcA-6, indicating the present of a methyl ester group, and all their proton and carbon signals were assigned (Table 1). The glycosylation positions and sugar sequence of compound 1 were confirmed by the two long-range HMBC correlations (Fig. 2) of H-1′ of GlcA at δ 4.38 with C-3 at δ 83.8, and H-1′′ of Xyl at δ 4.50 with C-3′ of GlcA at δ 85.9. In the NOESY spectrum (Fig. 2), the NOE cross-peaks were observed between H–C(2) and H–C(3), Me(24), Me(25), between H–C(3) and H–C(2), Me(24), Me(25), between H–C(5) and H–C(23), between Me(25) and Me(26), and between H–C(18) and Me(27), Me(29), confirming β-positions of H–C(2), H–C(3), Me(24), Me(25), and Me(26) and α-orientations of H–C(18), H–C(23), Me(27), and Me(29). Consequently, the structure of compound 1 was elucidated as 2α-hydroxyl-23-aldehyde-3α-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-D-(6′-methyl)-glucuronopyranosyl-oleanolic acid, named celosin M.
Compound 2 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was C20H27O10N as determined from HR-ESI-MS ions at m/z 440.1546 ([M − H]−, C20H26O10N calculated for 440.1562, 3.6 ppm), 476.1310 ([M + Cl]−, C20H27O10NCl calculated for 476.1318, 1.7 ppm) and 486.1600 ([M + HCOOH − H]−, C21H28O12N calculated for 486.1617, 3.5 ppm). A sharp IR absorption band at 2255 cm−1 indicated the presence of a CN group16 and this was proved by the presence of a quaternary carbon signal at δ 119.9 (C-8) in the 13C NMR spectrum. The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 2 exhibited two anomeric proton signals at δ 4.72 (1H, br.d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-Rha-1) and 4.88 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, H-Glc-1), and four aromatic proton signals at δ 7.32 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2, 6), 7.12 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-3, 5). The 13C NMR spectrum contained 20 signals, which included six aromatic carbon signals at δ 126.0 (C-1), 130.3 (C-2, 6), 118.3 (C-3, 5), 158.6 (C-4) and two anomeric carbon signals at δ 102.2 (Glc-1) and 102.1 (Rha-1). In HMBC, there were two long-range HMBC correlations (Fig. 3) of H-1′ of Glc at δ 4.88 with C-4 at δ 158.6, and H-1′′ of Rha at δ 4.72 with C-6′ of Glc at δ 67.8, suggesting the existence of a sugar linkage of α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl and the attachment of the sugar moiety at C-4 of the aromatic ring. Besides, long-range HMBC correlations were observed between H-7 (δ 3.85) and C-1 (δ 126.0), C-2 (δ 130.3), C-8 (δ 119.9), indicating that the acetonitrile group was attached at C-1 of the aromatic ring. A comparison of the 13C NMR data of compound 2 with those of adenophoraside C, isolated from Adenophora roots,17 showed that the structure of compound 2 was nearly identical to that of adenophoraside C, except for an additional methoxy signal of adenophoraside C. The β-configuration of D-glucose and α-configuration of L-rhamnose were determined by the J1,2 values of 7.6 Hz and 1.2 Hz, respectively. Consequently, the structure of 2 was elucidated as 4-hydroxyl-phenylacetonitrile 4-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranoside.
Compounds 3–11 were respectively identified as celosin I (3),18 α-spinasterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (4),19 celosin J (5),18 celosin H (6),18 2β, 23-dihydroxy-3-O-[β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1→3)-β-D-glucuronopyranosyl]-28-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl-oleanolic acid (7),20 celosin K (8),20 chikusetsusaponin IV (9),21 4-hydroxyl-phenylacetonitrile 4-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranoside (10)16 and celosin A (11)22 by various spectral analysis and comparison with the literature values. It is worth noting that compounds 4, 7, 9, and 10 were obtained for the first time from the title plant.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 HPLC chromatograms of reference substances (compounds 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9) (A) and a sample of stir-fried Semen Celosiae (B). | ||
± SD, n = 3)
| Analytes | Stir-fried product (mg g−1) | Crude product (mg g−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Compound 3 | 1.419 ± 0.02 | 1.355 ± 0.004 |
| Compound 5 | 0.831 ± 0.01 | 0.857 ± 0.008 |
| Compound 6 | 0.822 ± 0.005 | 0.862 ± 0.01 |
| Compound 8 | 0.115 ± 0.001 | 0.149 ± 0.0001 |
| Compound 9 | 0.161 ± 0.002 | 0.124 ± 0.01 |
| Total concentration | 3.348 | 3.247 |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 HPLC chromatograms of reference substances (compounds 2 and 10) (A) and a sample of stir-fried Semen Celosiae (B). | ||
± SD, n = 3)
| Analytes | Stir-fried product (mg g−1) | Crude product (mg g−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Compound 2 | 0.097 ± 0.001 | 0.081 ± 0.003 |
| Compound 10 | 0.090 ± 0.001 | 0.090 ± 0.002 |
| Total concentration | 0.187 | 0.171 |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 Effects of compounds 1–11 on the viability of NSC-34 cells after treatment with t-BHP. #, P < 0.01 versus the control group; **, P < 0.01, *, P < 0.05 versus the t-BHP group. | ||
![]() | ||
| Fig. 7 ROS levels were assayed by measuring the fluorescence intensity of CellROX. #, P < 0.01 versus the control group; **, P < 0.01, *, P < 0.05 versus the t-BHP group. | ||
![]() | ||
| Fig. 8 Images of accumulation and elimination of ROS in NSC-34 cells. Scale bar = 20 μm. Average fluorescence intensity values were quantified using ImageJ software. | ||
![]() | ||
| Fig. 9 Effect of compounds 1–11 on the apoptosis rate of motor neurons. #, P < 0.01 versus the control group; **, P < 0.01, *, P < 0.05 versus the t-BHP group. | ||
In this work, many oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins were separated from Semen Celosiae, and such a process revealed that it contains high levels of oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins.4 Due to the relatively large amounts of compounds 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9 obtained from Semen Celosiae, these compounds have potential to act as chemical markers for quality control of this plant, and so their contents in this plant were further determined. The results demonstrated that the seed part contained high concentrations of compounds 3, 5, and 6 which were all more than 0.8 mg g−1. The content of compound 3 was almost twice as much as compounds 5/6, and approximately ten times of compound 8/9 detected in the stir-fried and crude products, suggesting that compound 3 may be the key component for delegating the quality of Semen Celosiae.23 Likewise, the contents of compounds 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9 remain well above the levels of compounds 2 and 10 which were a new class of chemical constituents found for the first time in Semen Celosiae. Accordingly, oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins are thought to be the major active compounds of Semen Celosiae. In terms of concentrations of the five triterpenoid saponins and two phenylacetonitriles, there were some differences between the crude and stir-fried products. After stir-frying, the contents of compounds 2, 3, and 9 increased, while those of compounds 5, 6, and 8 decreased. However, the total concentration of the seven constituents (compounds 2, 3, 5, 6, and 8–10) in the stir-fried product was much higher than that in the crude product, indicating that stir-frying may conduce to dissolving out the effective components from plant seeds.24
Notable health-promoting properties associated with saponins in Semen Celosiae include hepatoprotective effect, antitumor, antioxidative, and anti-inflammatory activities, etc. In contrast to the detailed accounts in other reports listing various activities after the intake of saponins,4,8 the understanding of physiological effects of phenylacetonitrile glycosides remains limited. Given that the famous ancient document “Ben Cao Gang Mu” (the end of the 16th century) recorded the neuroprotective benefits of Semen Celosiae, there was a hypothesis that compounds 1–11 would possess such protective properties. To our knowledge, the present work is the first study which examines the neuroprotective effect of compounds 1–11 isolated from Semen Celosiae on cultured neurons.
It was reported that oxidative stress and free radical generation serve pivotal roles in neuronal loss and progression of neurodegenerative conditions.25 NSC-34 cells were treated with t-BHP to induce oxidative injury. The protective effects of compounds 1–11 were investigated by CCK-8 assays (Fig. 6), and these results revealed that the viability of NSC-34 cells pretreated with compounds 1–11 was significantly much higher than that of the t-BHP group after exposure to t-BHP, indicating that compounds 1–11 might significantly enhance neuron survival and reduce oxidative damage.
Since t-BHP can easily penetrate cells and generate highly reactive hydroxyl radicals that successively attack cellular components including lipids, protein, and DNA, oxidative damage was thereby generated in cells. The mitochondrion is a major intracellular source of ROS and a target of high ROS exposure and has deleterious consequences.9,26 The generation of ROS was quantified using the fluorescent probe CellROX red reagent. The red fluorescence indicates that the overproduction of ROS induces oxidative stress. It is observed that a decrease in t-BHP-induced ROS production in the NSC-34 cells pretreated with compounds 1–11 (Fig. 7) was further confirmed by confocal microscopy observation (Fig. 8). Increasing intracellular ROS formation causes apoptosis in neuronal cells. Apoptotic cell death is characterized by Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining. The results demonstrated that compounds 1–11 apparently reduced the apoptosis rate at a dosage of 2 μM, indicating that compounds 1–11 can effectively inhibit apoptosis induced by t-BHP.
Regarding the cell viability, ROS level, and apoptosis rate, compounds 1–11 all show different levels of activity. Compounds 1, 6, and 11 have the same aglycone structure, except for the relative configuration of substituents at the 2,3-position. Nevertheless, compound 1 exhibits an excellent protective effect compared with compounds 6 and 11, suggesting that methylation of glucuronic acid in the 3-position, as well as α-orientations of substituents at the 2,3-position, may make a crucial contribution to compound 1. Owing to the presence of glucose at the 28-position of compound 6, its neuroprotective effect is evidently weak in contrast to compounds 1 and 11, indicating that the glucose group at the 28-position may increase the hydrophilicity and steric hindrance27 which prevent compound 6 from crossing the cell membranes to exert a protective effect on neural cells. Moreover, compounds 7–9 also have a similar structure, and one main difference among them is that different numbers of hydroxyl groups were observed at the A-ring part of compounds 7–9. Among them, compound 7 displayed the lowest ROS level and apoptosis rate than the others. It can be concluded that the presence of these hydroxyl groups may trigger more effective neuroprotection. Interestingly, phenylacetonitriles are highly toxic, as the oral LD50 is 45.5 mg kg−1 for mice and 270 mg kg−1 for rats.28 Similar to phenylacetonitrile glycosides with the same aglycone structure, compounds 2 and 4 did not show significant cytotoxicity in the range of 1–50 μM in NSC-34 cells. Compound 2 showed better protective capacity against t-BHP-induced cytotoxicity than compound 10, indicating that different types of saccharide molecules linked at C-4 may affect their activities described in this work and diminish toxicity.6
In the present study, compounds 1–11 can protect from cell injury and improve the cell-survival rate, but the related mechanism remains obscure. Compounds 1 and 7 are two oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins, which are major active compounds of Semen Celosiae. Compound 1 is a new compound and compound 7 shows an excellent protective capacity against t-BHP-induced cell apoptosis, so compounds 1 and 7 were chosen to investigate the mechanism of action.
When cells undergo apoptosis, some apoptosis-related proteins are activated or released.29 Excessive activation of the apoptotic pathway eventually results in the neuronal loss in neurodegenerative diseases.30,31 The following experimental results were in accordance with the observations above. Compounds 1 and 7 apparently decreased the ratio of cleaved caspase-3: caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-7: caspase-7 and the expression levels of cytochrome C to achieve an inhibitory effect on neuronal apoptosis. As mitochondria release more soluble proteins, cytochrome C for instance, they are involved in the mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway, which modulates the sensitivity to cell death signals to activate caspase cascade, and then cell apoptosis occurs.32,33 The data discussed above suggested that compounds 1–11 effectively antagonized t-BHP-induced neuronal apoptosis.
Generally, beneficial antioxidative and antiapoptotic effects are closely associated with some anti-oxidant enzymes in many neurodegenerative disease therapies.2 Superoxide dismutase (SOD), known as a detergent for free radicals in organisms, is the major enzyme responsible for the inactivation of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. SOD1 is a major isoform of SOD, and is intimately involved in Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and also exerts a prominent role in the ROS-induced oxidative damage in neurodegeneration.34 In the following study, it was found that compounds 1 and 7 up-regulated the protein expression of SOD1 in t-BHP-treated NSC-34 cells. In addition, they showed a significant effect on the expression of Keap1 protein compared with the t-BHP group. The Keap1–Nrf2 signaling pathway evokes an adaptive response to oxidative stress by regulating downstream antioxidant enzymes that serve to enhance cell survival.35 Our computational molecular simulations demonstrated that compounds 1 and 7 failed to dock into the binding sites of Keap1 (PDB ID: 6QMC) (see ESI†), which was probably caused by their large dimensions and strong steric effect from surrounding residues.36,37 Interestingly, the aglycone and sugar moiety of compounds 1 and 7 favorably docked to the active sites of Keap1 protein with a free binding energy ranging between −47.78 and −26.35 kcal mol−1 (see ESI†).
ROS also leads to the induction of autophagy at earlier time points which is a strong cell survival response and delays caspase activation. Autophagy plays a critical role in cell self-renewal, self-protection, tissue and organ development, growth, and differentiation.38,39 The important autophagy-regulatory protein Beclin-1 can regulate autophagic cell death and apoptosis.40 Dysregulated autophagy in neurocytes is related to the accumulation of oligomers and aggregates of misfolded proteins which is a characteristic of many neurodegenerative diseases. Autophagy upregulation can reduce the levels of toxic proteins, ameliorate signs of disease, and delay disease progression.41t-BHP-induced oxidative stress inhibited autophagy in the NSC 34 cells, which was significantly restored by compounds 1 and 7. Moreover, compounds 1 and 7-mediated autophagy may be instrumental in reversing t-BHP-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis. It is consistent with a previous report that the therapeutic effect of oleanane-type triterpenoid saponins extracted from Semen Celosiae on atherosclerosis may be related to the promotion of autophagy.42 Wang et al. also indicated that autophagy was conducive to the neuroprotective effect of Eclalbasaponin I, an oleanane-type triterpenoid saponin.7 The current research provides the first evidence that antioxidant and autophagic effects may be associated with the neuroprotective effect of compounds 1 and 7 from Semen Celosiae on t-BHP-induced motor neuron injury. In a word, the neuroprotective activities of compounds 1–11 from Semen Celosiae may provide some ideas for the development of therapeutic agents to treat neurodegenerative diseases.
Footnotes |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: NMR spectra, MS, IR, and UV spectra of compounds 1–11 are shown in Fig. S1–S39; calibration curves, linear range, precision, repeatability, stability, and recovery tests of seven analytes are shown in Tables S1–S6; molecular docking analyses are given in Fig. S40–S42 and Tables S7. See DOI: 10.1039/d0fo02033h |
| ‡ Equal contributors. |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |