Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: Stereoelectronic power of oxygen in control of chemical reactivity: the anomeric effect is not alone
Igor V.
Alabugin
*a,
Leah
Kuhn
a,
Michael G.
Medvedev
bc,
Nikolai V.
Krivoshchapov
bd,
Vera A.
Vil'
b,
Ivan A.
Yaremenko
b,
Patricia
Mehaffy
a,
Meysam
Yarie
e,
Alexander O.
Terent'ev
b and
Mohammad Ali
Zolfigol
e
aDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. E-mail: alabugin@chem.fsu.edu
bN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky prosp., 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
cA. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 28 Vavilova St., 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
dLomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1 (3), Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
eDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan 65167, Iran
First published on 20th August 2021
Abstract
Correction for ‘Stereoelectronic power of oxygen in control of chemical reactivity: the anomeric effect is not alone’ by Igor V. Alabugin et al., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, DOI: 10.1039/d1cs00386k.
The authors regret that Fig. 4 and 116 contained errors in the labeling of the acceptor orbitals of the carboxylic acids. The corrected versions of these figures are presented here.
 | ||
| Fig. 4 A selection of donor–acceptor anomeric interactions in organic O-functionalities. Eint values are computed for the Natural Bond Orbital method (NBO) using the second-order perturbation approximation for the PBE0-D3BJ/aug-cc-pVTZ/CPCM(H2O) level of theory. The orbital interaction diagram at the center of the scheme shows the equation used to calculate the interaction energy—Eint—and its contributors: Fij is the Fock matrix element between natural bond orbitals i and j, εσ and εσ* are the energies of the σ and σ* NBO's, and nσ is the population of the donor orbital.27 | ||
 | ||
| Fig. 116 Stereoelectronic “portrait” and conformational preferences of acetic acid. | ||
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |