Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Modulated podosome patterning in osteoclasts by fullerenol nanoparticles disturbs the bone resorption for osteoporosis treatment

Kui Chen ab, Huan Geng ac, Wei Liang ac, Haojun Liang ac, Yujiao Wang a, Jianglong Kong a, Jiaxin Zhang ab, Yuelan Liang a, Ziteng Chen ab, Jiacheng Li ab, Ya-nan Chang a, Juan Li a, Gengyan Xing *c and Gengmei Xing *a
aKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, P.R. China. E-mail: xinggm@ihep.ac.cn
bUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China
cDepartment of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, P.R. China. E-mail: xgy1350138@163.com

Received 15th May 2020 , Accepted 15th May 2020

First published on 1st June 2020


Abstract

Correction for ‘Modulated podosome patterning in osteoclasts by fullerenol nanoparticles disturbs the bone resorption for osteoporosis treatment’ by Kui Chen et al., Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 9359–9365, DOI: 10.1039/D0NR01625J.


The authors regret that there were errors concerning Fig. 1, 2 and 6 in the original manuscript. Fig. 1 and 2 were transposed in the original manuscript. Fig. 1 in the original article also displayed incorrect images of the Alizarin red S staining, and is corrected below as Fig. 2. Fig. 6(a) in the original article contained a mistake in the 3D images of the micro CT data.

In addition, Fig. S6 and S8 in the accompanying ESI displayed the wrong hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining results.

This correction does not affect the discussion or conclusions of the original article, only the display of the figures. The captions for the figures remain unaltered in content. The correct versions of Fig. 1, 2 and 6, along with their captions, are displayed below. Both the updated and original versions of Fig. S6 and S8 are available in the ESI accompanying the original article.


image file: d0nr90114h-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Characterization of fNPs. (a) AFM images of fNPs and the size distribution on the white line was analyzed. (b) Hydrodynamic size of fNPs and the zeta potential of fNPs in 10% FBS at different days, (c) images of fNPs at 0 day, 7 day, and 20 day; the cell viabilities of (d) BMMSCs and (e) BMMs with various concentrations of fNPs.

image file: d0nr90114h-f2.tif
Fig. 2 The effect of fNPs on the osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs and osteoclastogenesis in vitro. (a) BMMSCs were exposed to various concentrations of fNPs (0, 1, 10, and 50 μg ml−1) and induced to differentiate into osteoblasts for 14 days. Alizarin red S was applied to stain the calcium nodules red. Scale bar, 200 μm. (b) Mineralization was quantified following the colorimetric analysis of Alizarin red S elution from calcium nodules. BMMs were exposed to various concentrations of fNPs (0, 1, 10, and 50 μg ml−1). (c) Images of OCs with actin labelled in green and nuclei in blue. Scale bar, 200 μm. (d) Number of multinuclear cells (MNCs, nuclear >3) in the same area with different treatments was counted. Compared with the control group, 10 and 50 μg ml−1 of fNPs significantly decreased the number of MNCs. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, and p < 0.001. (e) Cells were stained with TRAP, an enzyme specifically expressed by OCs. Scale bar, 200 μm. (f) The size of MNCs with TRAP positive cells was significantly decreased with fNP treatment in a dose-dependent way. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, and p < 0.001. (g) Representative images of bone resorption pits on a Corning Osteo Assay Surface 24 well plate. Scale bar, 200 μm. (h) The resorption area quantified with Image J suggested that fNPs prevented the bone resorption by OCs. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, and p < 0.001.

image file: d0nr90114h-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Significant anti-osteoporosis effect of fNPs in an ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis model. (a) Micro CT examinations of femurs from different groups. Images from Micro CT show that the mass of the well-organized trabecular bone was increased by fNP treatment. (b) The relevant bone parameters have been analysed and collaboratively supported the fact that fNP treatment increased the bone mass. BV/TV means bone volume/tissue volume, BS/TV means bone surface/tissue volume, Tb.N means number of trabecular bone, Tb.Th means thickness of the trabecular bone, and Tb.Sp means space of the trabecular bone. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, and p < 0.001. (c) TRAP of femur tissues from different groups was stained. Scale bar, 50 μm. (d) Immunohistochemistry staining of BMP-2 on femur tissues. Scale bar, 20 μm.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.