Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Epoxy resin with exchangeable disulfide crosslinks to obtain reprocessable, repairable and recyclable fiber-reinforced thermoset composites

Alaitz Ruiz de Luzuriaga , Roberto Martin , Nerea Markaide , Alaitz Rekondo , Germán Cabañero , Javier Rodríguez and Ibon Odriozola *
Materials Division, IK4-CIDETEC Research Centre, Paseo Miramón 196, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain. E-mail: iodriozola@cidetec.es; Fax: +34 943309136; Tel: +34 943309022

Received 6th July 2020 , Accepted 6th July 2020

First published on 16th July 2020


Abstract

Correction for ‘Epoxy resin with exchangeable disulfide crosslinks to obtain reprocessable, repairable and recyclable fiber-reinforced thermoset composites’ by Alaitz Ruiz de Luzuriaga et al., Mater. Horiz., 2016, 3, 241–247, DOI: 10.1039/C6MH00029K.


The authors have detected an error in the calculation of the activation energy and vitrimer temperature. In Fig. 1b, log[thin space (1/6-em)]τ should be plotted on the y axis instead of ln[thin space (1/6-em)]τ. Due to this error, the calculated activation energy is incorrect and the energy should be multiplied by 2.3 (1/log[thin space (1/6-em)]e). The correct activation energy is 126.5 KJ mol−1 and the correct calculated vitrimer temperature is 75 °C. The authors apologise for this error and state that this error does not affect any of the scientific findings and interpretations.

A detailed list of changes is provided as follows:

• The correct version of Fig. 1b is shown below


image file: d0mh90047h-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (b) Fitting of the relaxation times to the Arrhenius’ equation (R-square = 0.946).

• On page 243, “From this equation, an activation energy (Ea) of 55 kJ mol−1 was calculated for the dynamic epoxy network 5. Such activation energy is lower than other reported systems…” should be changed to “From this equation, an activation energy (Ea) of 126 kJ mol−1 was calculated for the dynamic epoxy network 5. Such activation energy is similar to other reported systems…”

• On page 243, “For our dynamic epoxy system 5, the hypothetical Tv value obtained was −13 °C, which is well below its Tg (127 °C from DSC).” should be changed to “For our dynamic epoxy system 5, the hypothetical Tv value obtained was 75 °C, which is well below its Tg (127 °C from DSC).”

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.