Tao
Yang
*a,
Chuncai
Kong
a,
Shengchun
Yang
a,
Zhimao
Yang
a,
Sen
Yang
a and
Masahiro
Ehara
*bc
aSchool of Science, MOE Key Laboratory for Non-Equilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China. E-mail: taoyang1@xjtu.edu.cn
bResearch Center for Computational Science, Institute for Molecular Science, Nishigonaka 38, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan. E-mail: ehara@ims.ac.jp
cElements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries (ESICB), Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8520, Japan
First published on 23rd October 2019
The reaction mechanism, ligand and norbornene effects, and origins of meta-selectivity in Pd/norbornene-catalyzed alkylation and arylation via C–H activation are theoretically elucidated by DFT computation. The reaction proceeds through six major steps: ortho-C–H activation, norbornene insertion into Pd–C bonds, meta-C–H activation, meta-C–C bond formation, β-carbon elimination, and protodemetallation. Both ortho-C–H and meta-C–H activations undergo a concerted metalation–deprotonation pathway. The meta-C–C bond formation, which is the selectivity-determining step, follows a Pd(IV) pathway via oxidative addition on a Pd(II) five-membered-ring intermediate. The oxidative addition of alkyl iodide adopts an SN2 pathway, whereas aryl iodide prefers concerted oxidative addition rather than the SN2 pathway. The Pd(II) pathway via meta-C–C reductive coupling on dinuclear palladium species is not the dominant pathway because of the low concentration of Pd(0)L2. For methylation, with norbornene and pyridine (or its derivative) as ligands, the C–C reductive coupling and C–C reductive elimination from the Pd(IV) intermediate are found to be the selectivity-determining steps for meta-functionalization and benzocyclobutene formation, respectively, whereas the use of large ligands such as acridine and quinoline-type ligands (L1 and L2) moves the selectivity-determining step back to the oxidative addition and the C–C reductive elimination steps on the Pd(II) intermediate. The geometric and electronic properties of L1 and L2 further suppress the benzocyclobutene formation by increasing the energy difference between meta-functionalization and benzocyclobutene formation. The combination of 2-carbomethoxynorbornene and L2 promotes meta-ethylation and -arylation by disfavoring the C–C reductive elimination steps from the Pd(II) and Pd(IV) intermediates as well as slightly favoring the oxidative addition step.
Inspired by the Catellani reaction,8,9 Yu’s group developed a new approach for meta-selective C–H functionalization of arenes containing an amide-directing group (phenyl acetamides) by employing norbornene (N1) and a Pd(II) catalyst with pyridine-based ligand L1 synthesized by their group (catalytic system A),10 as shown in Scheme 1. The use of this catalyst switches ortho-selectivity to meta-selectivity and achieves the highly selective meta-alkylation and -arylation. More interestingly, modifying the norbornene (N1) to 2-carbomethoxynorbornene (N2) and changing the ligand L1 to a quinoline-based ligand L2 (catalytic system B), Yu and coworkers significantly improved the efficiency and scope of this meta-selective C–H functionalization.11 For example, only functionalization of aryl iodides with either an ortho-coordinating group or multiple electron-withdrawing substituents could be achieved with catalytic system A, but the use of catalytic system B could overcome this limitation and a broad range of aryl iodides can be employed for the meta-arylation protocol. This synthesis strategy has been successfully extended to meta-C–H chlorination, amination, and alkynylation.12 Almost simultaneously, Dong and coworkers reported a similar Pd/norbornene-catalyzed meta-arylation reaction with dimethylamine as the directing group and AsPh3 as the ligand, which is also effective with the aryl iodides with ortho-coordinating groups.13 Very recently, Yu’s group further extended this approach and successfully realized remote enantioselective meta-C–H arylation and alkylation by using Pd and chiral 2-carbomethoxynorbornene.14
Scheme 1 Pd/norbornene-catalyzed meta-selective C–H activation of arenes.9,10 |
As shown in Scheme 2, the amide-directed ortho-C–H activation, forming the ortho-palladacycle I, was proposed to be the first step of the meta-C–H functionalization of phenyl acetamides. Then, norbornene inserts into the Pd–C bond of I followed by meta-C–H activation, producing palladacycle II. Subsequent reaction of II with a coupling partner (alkyl or aryl iodides) affords palladacycle IV with a functionalized meta position via intermediate III. This step, which is known as the key pathway of the Catellani process, usually contains oxidative addition, reductive elimination and β-carbon elimination. Final protodemetallation of the aryl–palladium bond delivers the desired product. Because of the presence of intermediates I, II, and IV, the side reactions including ortho-C–H functionalization, ortho,meta-C–H difunctionlization and C–C reductive elimination of palladacycle II to form benzocyclobutene can also take place. However, with the aid of the pyridine-based ligand L1 or L2, ortho-functionalized and ortho,meta-difunctionalized products were not observed experimentally, and the benzocyclobutene formation was minimized.
Scheme 2 Proposed mechanism for meta-selective C–H activation catalyzed by the Pd/norbornene system. |
Even though the Pd/norbornene-catalyzed meta-C–H functionalization of phenyl acetamides has been well utilized experimentally, important questions have been unsolved. For example, the reaction mechanism is not clear, especially the transformation step from palladacycle II to III is completely uncertain. There are two different pathways proposed in the literature, the Pd(IV) pathway and Pd(II) pathway (also known as the transmetalation15 pathway) which was proposed by Cardenas and Echavarren,16 as shown in Scheme 3. The reaction pathway significantly depends on the reactant species. Previous mechanistic studies demonstrated that the Pd/norbornene-catalyzed reaction of metallacycles II with alkyl halides follows the Pd(IV) pathway via oxidative addition.8a,17,18 However, for the aryl–aryl coupling, those two pathways could compete. By using an ethylene bridge to replace the norbornene unit, Cardenas and Echavarren performed theoretical calculations on simplified systems and revealed that the Pd(IV) pathway is favored over the Pd(II) pathway, which was also found by Wu and Lei.16,19 Catellani and Derat theoretically confirmed that the intermediate palladacycle without ortho-substitution preferably undergoes the transmetalation pathway, whereas these palladacycles could probably undergo oxidative addition of an aryl halide when an ortho-substituent is present.20 Moreover, the origins of selectivity of meta-C–H functionalization over other side reactions are not disclosed. Experimentalists need the knowledge about how much the ligand and norbornene influence the selectivity and scope of this reaction. However, the knowledge and answers for all these questions have not been presented at all.
The theoretical answers to the above open questions will undoubtedly deepen the understanding of the title reaction, assist in the design of more efficient and reactive norbornene and ligands, and promote further development of the meta-selective C–H functionalization methodology. In the present study, we performed theoretical calculations to elucidate the reaction mechanism, origins of selectivities, and effects of norbornene and ligands on palladium/norbornene-catalyzed amide-directed meta-selective C–H alkylation and arylation of phenyl acetamides.
The N-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-trifluoromethylphenylamide substrate (1a), which was derived from phenylacetic acid, was applied experimentally to the investigation of the ligand effect. Because the deprotonation reaction takes place with ΔG° = −4.6 kcal mol−1, as shown in Scheme 4, three possible coordination modes such as a charge-neutral N-donor amide (1a), a deprotonated N-donor amidate anion (1a′) and, its resonance form, an O-donor imidate (1a′′) are examined here. In a pre-catalyst 3 that is the isomer of the pre-catalyst 1, the substitution of acetate for 1a′ occurs through a transition state TS4 with a Gibbs activation energy (ΔG°‡) of 25.3 kcal mol−1 and a Gibbs reaction energy (ΔG°) of 3.1 kcal mol−1, as shown in Fig. 2, to afford Pd(OAc)(1a′)(Py)24. However, the substitution reaction of 1a and 1a′′ needs higher activation energy, indicating that 1a′ is more reactive to form an active species than 1a and 1a′′; see Fig. S1 and S2 in the ESI.†
Fig. 2 Gibbs free energy profiles for the substitution reactions of 1 and 2 with 1a′. Both trans- and cis-Pd(Py)2(OAc)2 pathways are included. |
A similar reaction that occurs from less stable cis complex 2 proceeds via a higher-energy transition state TS7 (ΔG°‡ = 27.6 kcal mol−1) to afford complex 8 (ΔG° = 4.6 kcal mol−1), indicating that 5 is preferably formed over 8. Further examination revealed that through releasing one 2-pyridine ligand, both 5 and 8 could lead to the formation of the same bidentate carboxylate complex, which could undergo the ortho-C–H activation (Fig. S3†). The reaction mechanism that starts from 5 will be discussed in the following section.
The original CMD pathway was found to be the most favored mechanism among the five possible pathways, which agrees with previous mechanistic studies on palladium(II) acetate-catalyzed C–H activation reactions.35 It is noteworthy that the direct CMD between complex 1a and trans-Pd(Py)2(OAc)2 occurs at the ortho-C–H bond with a moderately higher activation energy than that of the original CMD pathway, indicating that the auxiliary additive might not be necessary for the reaction.36 Very recently, Yu’s group realized Pd/N2-catalyzed auxiliary-free meta-C–H arylation of phenylacetic acids with a pyridine-type ligand,12f which is consistent with the present calculation results.
Fig. 3 depicts the most favored CMD pathway of ortho-C–H activation with the Gibbs energy profile starting from 5. The pathway starts from the attack of carboxylate oxygen on the Pd center and the dissociation of one pyridine ligand (TS9) occurs, resulting in a bidentate acetate intermediate 10. Then, 10 isomerizes to an intermediate 11, in which the ortho-C–H approaches the Pd center. No transition state has been located between 10 and 11. Starting from 11, the ortho-C–H bond of the phenyl group is activated and cleaved with the assistance of the bound acetate viaTS12 to afford an intermediate 13 with acetic acid being weakly bound to the Pd center. Further ligand exchange yields the six-membered-ring cyclopalladacycle 14. ortho-C–H activation viaTS12 needs the highest ΔG°‡ in the above steps but it is attainable at an energy of 24.8 kcal mol−1. As shown in Fig. 4, the Pd–C distance in TS12 becomes 2.121 Å and the H atom is transferred from the ortho-C to the acetate with C–H and O–H distances of 1.321 and 1.347 Å, respectively.
Fig. 3 Gibbs free energy profile for the concerted metalation–deprotonation (CMD) pathway of ortho-C–H activation. |
Fig. 4 Optimized structures of transition states TS12 and TS28 with selected distances given in angstroms. |
The highest-energy point in this pathway is TS19, which is 18.7 kcal mol−1 in energy. As shown by the black line in Fig. 5, there is another pathway that starts from norbornene insertion into the Pd–Ph bond viaTS23, leading to intermediate 24. After the coordination of AcOH to the Pd center (25), the protonation reaction takes place viaTS26 and the intermediate 27 is formed, followed by the isomerization to 21. The highest-energy point in this pathway is norbornene exo-migratory insertion viaTS23 (17.6 kcal mol−1),38 revealing that this pathway is preferred. The exo-migratory insertion agrees with the experimental observation.11
Fig. 5 also presents the CMD pathway of meta-C–H activation, TS28, in which the meta-C–H bond cleavage occurs with the aid of the acetate, with an activation energy of 24.2 kcal mol−1. Then, a five-membered-ring cyclopalladation intermediate 29 with weakly bound acetic acid is afforded. Further ligand exchange generates intermediate 30.37 Several other possible meta-C–H activation pathways, such as the oxidative addition of the C–H bond and an AcOH-assisted CMD pathway, have also been examined (Fig. S5†). However, they need larger activation energy, compared with the CMD pathway shown in Fig. 5. As shown in Fig. 4, the Pd–Hmeta-C distance in TS28 is 2.136 Å with C–H and O–H distances of 1.370 and 1.361 Å, respectively.
Two possible Pd(IV) pathways starting from five-membered-ring cyclopalladation 30 are investigated first in the present study, as shown in Fig. 6. The ligand dissociation from 30 results in an intermediate 31 with an unsaturated coordination site. The SN2 mechanism takes place via transition state TS32 with a ΔG°‡ of 20.2 kcal mol−1, resulting in a Pd(IV) five-membered-ring intermediate 33. In the case of the concerted oxidative addition pathway, the unsaturated coordination site near the meta-carbon is coordinated by CH3I to form an intermediate 34, and then, oxidative addition occurs via a three-membered-ring type oxidative addition transition state TS35 (26.0 kcal mol−1), leading to 33. Therefore, the SN2 mechanism is preferred over concerted oxidative addition.40
If the intermediate 33 undergoes the C–C reductive coupling first via transition state TS36 (17.3 kcal mol−1) to form an intermediate 37, in which the meta-C is functionalized by the methyl group, the abstraction of iodide from 37 by silver(I) will take place and acetate is bound on the Pd center, generating an intermediate 38. However, the abstraction of iodide could occur first from 33, generating an intermediate 39 with an acetate. The subsequent C–C reductive coupling viaTS40 needs only 15.4 kcal mol−1, indicating that this pathway is favored.41
Fig. 7 presents the free energy profile of the Pd(II) pathway (the transmetalation pathway), which starts with an association intermediate 41 from CH3Pd(I)Py2 and intermediate 30. Then, the meta-C transfers from the first palladium atom of 41 to the second palladium atom in 43viaTS42. The reductive elimination occurs viaTS44 on the second palladium atom with an energy of 22.4 kcal mol−1.42,43
The resulting intermediate 45 could transfer to 36via the release of Pd(0)Py2. The activation energy of the Pd(II) pathway is not so high and CH3Pd(I)Py2 could be generated from the oxidative addition of Pd(0)Py2 (Scheme 3).44 However, no Pd(0) species but only the Pd(II)(OAc)2 catalyst was added at the very beginning in the experiments. Pd(0)Py2 could be formed only if benzocyclobutene is produced (see Section 6), which is usually unfavoured and occurs at a very late stage. Thus, in the following sections, the activation energy of the Pd(II) pathway viaTS43 will be just provided and not be discussed unless the formation of Pd(0) species is preferred.
The key transition states TS32 and TS35 of SN2 and concerted oxidative addition pathways are shown in Fig. 8. TS32 is a typical SN2 transition state with a Pd–C–I bond angle of 122.2°. The concerted oxidative addition transition state TS35 has a three-membered ring with a Pd–C distance of 2.425 Å.
Fig. 8 Optimized structures of transition states TS32 and TS35 with selected distances given in angstroms and angles in degrees. |
In one pathway, the Pd–N bond formation takes place first, as shown in Fig. 9 (black line). Via transition state TS46, the resultant intermediate 47 was located, which is an eight-membered-ring palladacycle coordinated with acetic acid. The dissociation of acetic acid generates an intermediate 48. The second step is the β-carbon elimination viaTS49 to afford an intermediate 50. This intermediate undergoes ligand exchange to form six-membered-ring palladacycle 51. In the other pathway, as shown by the red line in Fig. 9, the ortho-Cnorbornene bond is cleaved via transition state TS52, followed by the deprotonation reaction (TS55) of the amide auxiliary. The highest energy TS in the second pathway is TS52 (−5.4 kcal mol−1), whose energy is a bit higher than that of TS49 (−9.6 kcal mol−1) involved in the first pathway. These results demonstrate that the first pathway more preferably occurs than the second one.
The activation energy of norbornene de-insertion viaTS49 is as low as 22.7 kcal mol−1 relative to 48, suggesting that it can occur easily under the experimental conditions. On the other hand, the β-H elimination from 38 needs a much larger activation energy of 64.3 kcal mol−1. As mentioned above, the norbornene insertion viaTS23 also needs a low activation energy of 22.2 kcal mol−1 relative to 14. The easy norbornene de-insertion, along with norbornene insertion, is of high importance in completing the catalytic meta-functionalization reaction.
Fig. 10 depicts free energy profile of the protodemetallation step starting from the intermediate 51. The protonation reaction occurs on the meta-C viaTS57 (−11.6 kcal mol−1), leading to an intermediate 58. This intermediate undergoes acetic acid coordination, protonation of the amide auxiliary, and product dissociation to yield the meta-functionalized product 62 with the Pd(II) catalyst. The large activation energy of the above steps is 27.4 kcal mol−1 (TS57 relative to 51), which is acceptable under the experimental conditions.
Fig. 10 Gibbs free energy profile for the protodemetallation step of intermediate 51 leading to the meta-functionalized product 62. |
As shown in Fig. 11, one possible reaction pathway starting from intermediate 30 is Cnorborneyl–Cphenyl bond formation via reductive elimination to afford benzocyclobutene 64. However, the reductive elimination (TS63) with two ligands (red line in Fig. 11) needs a large activation energy of 41.2 kcal mol−1 relative to 30. Then, the pathway starting from 31 after the ligand dissociation was examined. The reductive elimination from 31viaTS65 (28.2 kcal mol−1) forms a product complex of benzocyclobutene 66. The benzocyclobutene 64 will be formed when PdPy2 is dissociated. The possibility of benzocyclobutene formation through the C–C reductive elimination from 33 is also examined. Starting from 32, the C–C reductive elimination (TS67) is 19.0 kcal mol−1 in energy and results in benzocyclobutene 64 and CH3Pd(I)Py2. However, starting from the intermediate 39 that comes from the abstraction of iodide from 33, the energy barrier of C–C reductive elimination (TS69) is only 15.0 kcal mol−1, which is quite close to the activation energy of C–C reductive coupling viaTS40 (15.4 kcal mol−1), in excellent agreement with the experimental observation of the same yields of meta-functionalization and benzocyclobutene products. CH3Pd(OAc)Py2 will be generated in this pathway.
Fig. 11 Gibbs free energy profile for the formation mechanism of the benzocyclobutene product 64 starting from intermediate 30. Only selected chemical structures are shown for clarity. |
Further examinations revealed that the activation energies of the formation pathways of ortho-functionalized and ortho,meta-difunctionalized products are as high as 32.7 and 38.0 kcal mol−1, respectively, suggesting that these pathways could not compete with meta-functionalization and benzocyclobutene formation, which agrees well with the experimental observation. Please see Fig. S6 and S7 in the ESI for details.†
As discussed above, several important steps control the selectivity between meta-functionalized and benzocyclobutene products. The Pd(IV) pathway via oxidative addition TS32 (or TS35) and the C–C reductive elimination step TS65 lead to the Pd(IV) intermediate 33 and benzocyclobutene product, respectively. If the Pd(IV) pathway viaTS32 (or TS35) is preferred over TS65, the C–C reductive coupling TS36 (or TS40) and C–C reductive elimination TS67 (or TS69) will become the selectivity-determining steps for meta-functionalized and benzocyclobutene products, respectively.
To discuss the ligand effect, the reaction of 1a with methyl iodide is investigated for consistency with the experiment. As shown in Table 1, the calculated results show excellent agreement with the experimental observation. The concerted oxidative addition pathway viaTS35 always could not compete with the SN2 mechanism viaTS32 in the oxidative addition step. Although the catalyst Pd(acridine)2 has possibly been formed together with the benzocyclobutene viaTS65, which would switch on the Pd(II) pathway viaTS44 with a low activation energy of 17.4 kcal mol−1, benzocyclobutene formation is still preferred to meta-alkylation, revealing that the Pd(IV) pathway and the C–C reductive elimination viaTS65 are the dominant pathways under the experimental conditions.
Charges | Pd(IV) pathway | ΔΔG°‡(a)a | meta-Methylation | Benzocyclobutene | ΔΔG°‡(b)b | Pd(II) pathway | Experimental yields10 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pd in 31 | TS32 | TS35 | TS65 | TS36 | TS40 | TS67 | TS69 | TS44 | meta-Methylation:benzocyclobutene | |||
a ΔΔG°‡(a) = ΔΔG°‡(TS32–TS65). b ΔΔG°‡(b) = ΔΔG°‡(min{TS36,TS40}–min{TS67,TS69}). | ||||||||||||
Py | +0.329 | 20.2 | 26.0 | 28.2 | −8.0 | 17.3 | 15.4 | 19.0 | 15.0 | +0.4 | 22.4 | 15%:15% |
DMAP | +0.314 | 23.9 | 30.5 | 31.3 | −7.4 | 19.4 | 18.7 | 23.0 | 21.3 | −2.6 | 35.5 | 32%:8% |
Acridine | +0.294 | 23.4 | 30.2 | 22.9 | +0.5 | 11.0 | 13.8 | 13.7 | 15.6 | −2.7 | 17.4 | 28%:58% |
L1 | +0.286 | 23.3 | 31.1 | 24.5 | −1.2 | 10.1 | 14.2 | 14.7 | 15.0 | −4.6 | 28.3 | 85%:15% |
L2 | +0.294 | 24.0 | 33.4 | 24.9 | −0.9 | 10.7 | 7.3 | 15.6 | 13.9 | −6.6 | 23.3 | 80%:20% |
With a small ligand such as Py or DMAP (4-dimethylaminopyridine) as the ligand, the C–C reductive coupling TS36 (or TS40) and C–C reductive elimination TS67 (or TS69) from Pd(IV) intermediate 33 are the selectivity-determining steps. The electron-donating substituent in DMAP stabilizes the Pd(IV) intermediate and further distinguishes the C–C reductive coupling and C–C reductive elimination steps, resulting in the increased yield of meta-alkylation. On the other hand, the presence of a large ligand (acridine, L1, or L2) makes the selectivity-determining step move back to the oxidative addition TS32 and the C–C reductive elimination TS65 starting from the Pd(II) intermediate 31. There are two main reasons: (a) the Pd(IV) intermediate is more sensitive to the ligand size than the Pd(II) intermediate, and thus the C–C reductive elimination from the Pd(IV) intermediate with a large ligand is obviously prohibited; (b) the activation energy of C–C reductive elimination from the Pd(II) intermediate viaTS65 remarkably decreases from 28.2–31.3 kcal mol−1 with a small ligand to 22.9–24.9 kcal mol−1 with a large ligand, which partly comes from the attractive interaction between the large ligand and the 4-(CF3)C6F4 group, as shown by the short F–H distance (2.403 Å) in TS65-N1-L1 in Fig. 12. Further fine tuning of the ligand from acridine to L1 or L2 will disfavor the C–C reductive elimination and change the selectivity between meta-alkylation and benzocyclobutene formation.
Fig. 12 Optimized structures of transition states TS32-N1-L1-Me and TS65-N1-L1 of methyl iodide. The selected distances and angles are given in angstroms and in degrees, respectively. |
The NBO charges of the Pd atom in 31 were also calculated for all the reaction systems, as shown in Table 1. By comparing the Pd charge with that of acridine (+0.294) and L2 (+0.294), it is clear that both ligands have similar electron-donating properties; however, the selectivity between the C–C reductive coupling and C–C reductive elimination is reversed from acridine to L2, indicating that both geometric and electronic properties of the ligand play important roles.
Fig. 12 presents the optimized structures of transition states TS32-N1-L1-Me and TS65-N1-L1 with L1 as the ligand, which are the selectivity-determining steps. TS32-N1-L1-Me is a typical SN2 transition state with a Pd–C–I angle of 157.6°. The F–H distance of 2.403 Å in TS65-N1-L1 is shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii of hydrogen (1.10 Å) and fluorine (1.46 Å),46 suggesting the attractive interaction between the ligand and 4-(CF3)C6F4 group.
For the norbornene effect on meta-alkylation, the reaction of 1b with ethyl iodide is studied using N1, N2 and L2 as the ligand, considering experimental conditions. As shown in Table 2, when norbornene N1 is employed, the oxidative addition step viaTS32 is moderately lower in energy (−1.7 kcal mol−1) than the C–C reductive elimination step viaTS65; however, the reductive coupling viaTS36 is disfavored by 0.6 kcal mol−1 in energy than the C–C reductive coupling viaTS67. This result agrees with the experimental observation that the yields of benzocyclobutene and the meta-ethylation products are 85% vs. 10%.
Charges | Pd(IV) pathway | ΔΔG°‡(a)a | meta-Ethylation | Benzocyclobutene | ΔΔG°‡(b)b | Pd(II) pathway | Experimental yields11 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pd in 31 | TS32 | TS35 | TS65 | TS36 | TS40 | TS67 | TS69 | TS44 | meta-Ethylation:benzocyclobutene | |||
a ΔΔG°‡(a) = ΔΔG°‡(TS32–TS65). b ΔΔG°‡(b) = ΔΔG°‡(min{TS36,TS40}–min{TS67,TS69}). | ||||||||||||
N1 | +0.285 | 23.2 | 27.6 | 24.9 | −1.7 | 13.6 | 15.0 | 13.0 | 15.4 | +0.6 | 21.3 | 10%:85% |
N2 | +0.356 | 22.7 | 23.1 | 30.2 | −7.5 | 23.1 | 19.5 | 33.7 | 31.4 | −11.9 | 30.8 | 97%:0% |
When N2 is used instead of N1, the C–C reductive elimination steps, including TS65, TS67, and TS69, need higher activation energies, leading to an obvious energy difference of 7.5 kcal mol−1 (or 11.8 kcal mol−1) between TS32 (or TS40) and TS65 (or TS69). These results clearly reveal that with N2 as norbornene the meta-ethylation product is preferred over benzocyclobutene, consistent with the experimental result. Because of the repulsion induced by the CO2Me group in N2, the C–C reductive elimination is prohibited, which was also found in our recent theoretical study on Ni-catalyzed (2 + 2 + 2) cycloaddition of 1,6-ene-allenes and alkenes.47 As shown in Fig. 13, the steric repulsion in TS40-N1-L2-Et mainly appears between the ethyl group and substrate (or norbornene), as indicated by the two short H–H distances (2.263 and 2.288 Å). Nevertheless, in TS40-N2-L2-Et, several short H–H distances appear, including 2.217, 2.456, and 2.475 Å, indicating the obvious steric repulsion. The NBO charge of the Pd atom in 31 as shown in Table 2 increases from +0.285 with N1 to +0.356 with N2, which comes from the electron-withdrawing property of the CO2Me group. The presence of the CO2Me group also favors the SN2 pathway viaTS32 with the activation energy slightly decreasing from 23.2 to 22.7 kcal mol−1 and concerted oxidative addition viaTS35 with the activation energy dropping from 27.6 to 23.1 kcal mol−1.45
Fig. 13 Optimized structures of transition states TS40-N1-L2-Et and TS40-N2-L2-Et of amide substrate 1b and ethyl iodide with the selected distances given in angstroms. |
Besides meta-alkylation, meta-arylation producing biaryl compounds can also be achieved with the catalytic systems A (L1 and N1) and B (L2 and N2). Compared to the catalytic system A which is only effective for ortho-substituted aryl iodides, catalytic system B in PhCF3 solvent has been successfully applied to meta-arylation of phenyl iodide and 2-, 3- or 4-substituted aryl iodides.10,11,48 Thus, the key selectivity-determining steps were investigated by employing the catalytic system B with amide substrate 1b and methyl 2-iodobenzoate Ar2I (or methyl 3-iodobenzoate Ar3I, Scheme 5) as the reactant model. Since the concerted oxidative addition transition state has been revealed to be preferred for aryl iodides in the Pd(IV) pathway,20 the SN2 pathway viaTS32 will not be discussed here.
Table 3 shows the computed activation energies of all the selected transition states. The selectivity-determining step is the oxidative addition viaTS35 and C–C reductive elimination viaTS65. For both Ar2I and Ar3I, the activation energy for TS35 is obviously lower than that of TS65, which agrees with the experimental observation that catalytic system B is effective for both ortho-substituted and ortho-unsubstituted aryl iodides. However, ortho-substituted aryl iodide is more easily coupled than ortho-unsubstituted aryl iodide because of the lower activation energy (28.7 kcal mol−1) for oxidative addition with Ar2I than that (30.0 kcal mol−1) with Ar3I, which might be attributed to the attractive interaction between the directing group and CO2Me of Ar2I, as indicated by the short O–H distance (2.059 Å) in Fig. 14. The Pd(IV) pathway viaTS44 does not play an important role, since Pd(L2)2 could not be generated under the experimental conditions. The activation energy (30.2 kcal mol−1) for TS44 with Ar3I is comparable to that of TS35, indicating that the combination of a large ligand and modified norbornene can make the Pd(IV) pathway have similar activation energy, although there is an ortho-substituted group (the directing group) of the phenyl group.
Pd(IV) pathway | ΔΔG°‡(a)a | meta-Arylation | Benzocyclobutene | ΔΔG°‡(b)b | Pd(II) pathway | Experimental yields10,11 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TS35 | TS65 | TS36 | TS40 | TS67 | TS69 | TS44 | meta-Arylation:benzocyclobutene | |||
a ΔΔG°‡(a) = ΔΔG°‡(TS35–TS65). b ΔΔG°‡(b) = ΔΔG°‡(min{TS36,TS40}–min{TS67,TS69}). | ||||||||||
Ar2I | 28.7 | 34.9 | −6.2 | 26.8 | 21.0 | 34.6 | 29.1 | −8.1 | 37.3 | 100%:0% |
Ar3I | 30.0 | 34.9 | −4.9 | 24.3 | 17.7 | 39.5 | 34.7 | −17.0 | 30.2 | 100%:0% |
Fig. 14 Optimized structures of TS35-N2-L2-Ar2 and T35-N2-L3-Ar3 of amide substrate 1b and aryl iodide (Ar2I and Ar3I) with selected distances given in angstroms. |
There are two possible pathways for the oxidative addition step, which depends on the nature of the coupling iodide; the alkyl iodide undergoes an SN2 pathway, whereas the aryl iodide prefers concerted oxidative addition rather than the SN2 pathway. For methyl iodide, with norbornene and pyridine (or DMAP), the C–C reductive coupling and C–C reductive elimination from the Pd(IV) intermediate are found to be the selectivity-determining steps of meta-functionalization and benzocyclobutene formation, respectively. However, the use of a large ligand (acridine, L1, and L2) changes the selectivity-determining step to the oxidative addition and the C–C reductive elimination from the Pd(II) intermediate. The geometric and electronic properties of L1 and L2 suppress the benzocyclobutene formation by increasing the energy difference between those two pathways. The combination of 2-carbomethoxynorbornene and L2 utilizes the electronic and steric effects and promotes meta-alkylation and -arylation by disfavoring the C–C reductive elimination steps from the Pd(II) and Pd(IV) intermediates as well as favoring the oxidative addition step.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc04720d |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 |