DOI:
10.1039/C9RA04467A
(Paper)
RSC Adv., 2019,
9, 24875-24879
A novel carboxylic-functional indole-based aerogel for highly effective removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution via synergistic effects of face–point and point–point interactions†
Received
14th June 2019
, Accepted 1st August 2019
First published on 12th August 2019
Abstract
A new type of carboxylic-functional indole-based aerogel (CHIFA) has been successfully prepared via a facile sol–gel technology, which possessed a highly effective removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution through the synergistic effects of face–point and point–point interactions.
Introduction
In recent years, the health of human beings has been endangered by heavy metal ions, and the necessity for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution is a very important issue due to their toxicity and bioaccumulation.1–4 Moreover, excessive intake of heavy metal ions, for example, Ni(II),5 Cu(II),6 Zn(II)7 and Cr(III)8 is harmful to humans and other species. A wide range of technologies have been devised for the removal of metal ions from water including chemical precipitation,9 organic chelation,10 biological removal,11 ion-exchange,12,13 membrane separation14 and adsorption.15,16 Among these approaches, adsorption is found to be the most attractive way due to its advantages of relative simplicity, easy scale-up and high efficiency over a wide concentration range.17,18 Developing novel efficient, economical, green and environment-friendly adsorbents for heavy metal ions has been considered as an effective way to mitigate environmental deterioration. Aerogels have many specific features such as large surface area, high porosity, adjustable pore size, thermal and chemical stability, showing great advantages for the removal of heavy metals.19–22 However, the inherent physisorptive metal-adsorption mechanism makes them inevitably suffer from low adsorption capacity and efficiency hence severely hampers their practical applications. Recently, it was shown that porous materials containing multiple functional groups exhibit combined effects of each functional group that improve adsorption capacity and efficiency of heavy metals.18,23 The previous study of our team has found that the 4-HIFA containing hydroxyl and electron-rich indole ring possessed strong affinity for heavy metals via the synergistic effects of complexation and cation–π interactions,23 however, the single functional group means that one hydroxyl can only complex one heavy metal, leading to less improvement in the heavy metals adsorption capacities for these indole-based aerogel materials. Therefore, to better utilize the cation–π interactions for developing new heavy metals adsorbent with both excellent adsorption capacity and efficiency still remains attractive prospects and great challenge. A recent study indicated that carboxyl group can be considered as a functionality for removal of heavy metals by porous adsorbents.17
Inspired by those fascinating studies, we hypothesized that heavy metal ions adsorption capacity and efficiency can be improved by involving hydroxyl, carboxyl and indole groups in aerogel materials where multiple mechanisms work for heavy metals removal. In this work, a novel carboxylic-functional indole-based aerogel (CHIFA) (Schemes 1 and S4†) was tactfully designed and prepared through a simple and gentle gelation reaction where the bifunctional hydroxyl and carboxyl groups were set up at the two sides of the indole plane, respectively (the material preparation and characterization are detailed in the ESI†). On the one hand, the electron-rich π indole plane is hopeful for attracting heavy metals via cation–π interactions which belong to face–point interactions. On the other hand, the abundant phenolic-OH and carboxyl groups in the CHIFA aerogel provide more adsorption sites than that of the previously reported indole-based aerogel23 to metal ions via complexations, which belong to point–point interactions. It was expected that the synergistic effects of face–point and point–point interactions would endow the resulting carboxylic-functional indole-based aerogel (CHIFA) remarkable heavy metals adsorption capacity and efficiency (Fig. 1).
![image file: c9ra04467a-s1.tif](/image/article/2019/RA/c9ra04467a/c9ra04467a-s1.gif) |
| Scheme 1 Chemical structures of RFA, HIFA, and CHIFA aerogels. | |
![image file: c9ra04467a-f1.tif](/image/article/2019/RA/c9ra04467a/c9ra04467a-f1.gif) |
| Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of heavy metals adsorption using CHIFA. | |
The as-prepared CHIFA is a black, porous ultralight material, as shown in inset in Fig. 2a. For comparison, resorcinol–formaldehyde aerogel (RFA) and 5-hydroxyindole–formaldehyde aerogel (HIFA) were prepared as well (Schemes 1, S2 and S3†). RFA, HIFA and CHIFA aerogels were characterized by Fourier transform infrared and 13C CP/MAS NMR, RFA was characterized by Fourier transform infrared, and the results were in good agreement with the proposed structures (Fig. S4–S6†).
![image file: c9ra04467a-f2.tif](/image/article/2019/RA/c9ra04467a/c9ra04467a-f2.gif) |
| Fig. 2 (a) SEM image and photograph (inset), (b) nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution (inset) of CHIFA. | |
Results and discussion
We first quantified the porosity of aerogels by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and sorption analysis using nitrogen as the sorbate molecule. Fig. 2a shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of CHIFA. The structure, which is very loose, contains mesopores and macropores. It consists of very small spheres, arranged in a filament-like structure to form a three-dimensional matrix, pretty similar to the structure of the RF gel.24 As shown in Fig. S7,† RFA and HIFA have similar porous structures with minor differences in the size and shape of the aggregated particles. The porosity of aerogels were further quantified by sorption analysis using nitrogen as the sorbate molecule. The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of CHIFA measured at −196 °C is shown in Fig. 2b, displaying a typical curve of type IV.25 There are hysteresis loops at relative pressures of 0.7–0.95, suggesting the presence of mesopores and macropores in the sample,26 in good agreement with those observed with the SEM technique (Fig. 2a). Correspondingly, the pore size is distributed at 43 nm, as calculated by the nonlocal density functional theory method (NLDFT). The BET specific surface area and pore volume of CHIFA are estimated to be 143 m2 g−1 and 0.98 cm3 g−1, respectively (Fig. 2b). As shown in Fig. S7,† RFA and HIFA have similar nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution (inset in Fig. S7†). The BET specific surface area of RFA and HIFA were estimated to be 118 m2 g−1 and 130 m2 g−1, the pore size was distributed at 52 nm and 46 nm, respectively.
It was expected that the resulting CHIFA with OH-containing and COOH-containing indole-based porous architecture may attract small heavy metal ions by the synergistic effects of face–point and point–point interactions between the CHIFA network and heavy metals, which inspires us to investigate its heavy metal ions adsorption capacity.
Fig. S8† shows the dependences of the adsorption capacity for Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+ on the pH value (2.0–6.0) over CHIFA. Fig. S9† shows Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+ adsorption recycled for 4 times.
The adsorption kinetics of the Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+ ions by CHIFA was investigated in order to study adsorption rate and pathways of adsorption until equilibrium was reached. The results (Tables S1–S4†) and sorption kinetics curves (Fig. 3a) show rapid uptake rates and high removal efficiency. Within 2 min, the CHIFA achieved ≥ 97% removal rates and Kd values of >104 mL g−1 for Ni2+ (Table S1†) and Cu2+ (Table S2†). Within 5 min, the CHIFA achieved ≥98% removal rates and Kd values of >104 mL g−1 for Ni2+ (Table S1†) and >105 mL g−1 for Cu2+ (Table S2†). Within 30 min, the CHIFA achieved ≥99% removal rates and Kd values of >105 mL g−1 for Ni2+ (Table S1†) and for Cu2+ (Table S2†). For the Cr3+ and Zn2+ ions (Tables S3 and S4†), the adsorption is slightly slow but still has a 98.35% and 98.66% removal rate in 30 min, respectively. The adsorptions for all of the four ions reach equilibrium within ∼2 min (Fig. 3a), which is more efficient than that of the previously reported indole-based aerogel.23
![image file: c9ra04467a-f3.tif](/image/article/2019/RA/c9ra04467a/c9ra04467a-f3.gif) |
| Fig. 3 Adsorption kinetics curves and sorption isotherms for Mn+ (Mn+ = Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+, Zn2+) by CHIFA: (a) sorption capacity (qt) with time, (b) pseudo-second-order kinetic plots for sorption, Langmuir equilibrium isotherms were derived from equilibrium concentration (Ce, ppm), plotted against the adsorption capacity (c) q (mg g−1) and (d) Ce/qe (g L−1). | |
The removal rate can be determined in two different ways: pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order mechanisms, which were defined as follows:27
|
Pseudo-first-order: ln (qe − qt) = ln qe − k1t
| (1) |
|
![image file: c9ra04467a-t1.tif](/image/article/2019/RA/c9ra04467a/c9ra04467a-t1.gif) | (2) |
where
qe (mg g
−1) is the adsorbed amount per unit mass of adsorbent at equilibrium and
qt (mg g
−1) is the adsorbed mass at time
t, while
k1 (min
−1) and
k2 (g mg
−1 min
−1) are corresponding equilibrium rate constants. The
k1 value was obtained by plotting ln
![[thin space (1/6-em)]](https://www.rsc.org/images/entities/char_2009.gif)
(
qe –
qt) against
t and the
k2 by plotting
t/
qt against
t. The linear relationship of
t/
qt versus t was presented in
Fig. 3b. From the kinetic parameters of Ni
2+, Cu
2+, Cr
3+ and Zn
2+ (Table S5
†), the calculated sorption capacities (
qe,cal) derived from the pseudo-second-order model are quite close to corresponding experimental values (
qe,exp). The fit coefficient (
R2) of 1 indicates the adsorption is well fitted with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, suggesting a chemisorption process.
28
Uptake capacity toward Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+ by CHIFA from aqueous solutions was studied with the batch method at room temperature. The maximum adsorption capacity of the material was determined from an adsorption equilibrium study. The Ni2+ capture by CHIFA was found to increase successively with increasing concentration (10–1000 ppm, Table S6†). Over a wide range of the initial concentration (10–100 ppm), the Ni2+ removal rates reached values of >98%, with the KNid values ranging from 6.2 × 104 to 8.8 × 106 mL g−1. The maximum removal capacity (qm) for Ni2+ reached ∼297.5 mg g−1, which is higher than that of the previously reported indole-based aerogel.23 In addition, this is an exceptionally high capacity competing with those of the best absorbers such as PMCNa hybrid hydrogels (224 mg g−1)29 and polyvinyl alcohol/corn starch hydrogel,30 for which adsorption capacities of various adsorbents are shown in Table S11.†
We also checked the adsorption of the CHIFA material for Cu2+ in the range of concentrations 10 ppm to 1000 ppm (Table S7†), and found that there are >99% removal rates in the initial concentration (10–100 ppm), and ∼382.5 mg g−1 maximum adsorption capacity, which is higher than that of the previously reported indole-based aerogel.23 In addition, this value is still very high compared to reported adsorbents (Table S11†). For Cr3+ and Zn2+, the maximum adsorption capacity is found to be relatively lower at ∼195.0 mg g−1 and 216.3 mg g−1 (Tables S8, and S9†), which is higher than that of the previously reported indole-based aerogel,23 however those value is still very high compared to reported adsorbents (Table S11†). In comparison to the reported materials as shown in Table S11,† the present CHIFA demonstrates superior removal capacities for the target ions, which is attributed to the function of the introduced hydroxyl, carboxyl and indole groups in the sample, which is very helpful for the synergistic effects of face–point and point–point interactions between the CHIFA network and heavy metals.
A Langmuir isotherm is used to describe the experimental data of Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+. In this model, the adsorbate moieties (Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+, Zn2+) are assumed to undergo monolayer type coverage of the sorbent on an adsorbent surface. Once an adsorption site is occupied, no further adsorption can happen at the same site. The Langmuir isotherm model is listed as equation:
|
![image file: c9ra04467a-t2.tif](/image/article/2019/RA/c9ra04467a/c9ra04467a-t2.gif) | (3) |
where
q (mg g
−1) is the equilibrium adsorption capacity of Ni
2+, Cu
2+, Cr
3+ and Zn
2+ adsorbed,
Ce (mg L
−1) is the Ni
2+, Cu
2+, Cr
3+ and Zn
2+ concentration at equilibrium,
qm (mg g
−1) is the theoretical maximum sorption capacity. The equilibrium adsorption isotherms are shown in
Fig. 3c, with the Ni
2+, Cu
2+, Cr
3+ and Zn
2+ equilibrium concentration ranging from 0.0008 to 836 ppm. The experimental data of uptake capacity for Ni
2+, Cu
2+, Cr
3+ and Zn
2+ are fitted well with the Langmuir isotherm model of
eqn (3), see
Fig. 3d. According to the Langmuir isotherm model, the expected capacity
qm of 298.5 mg g
−1 for Ni
2+, of 383.1 mg g
−1 for Cu
2+, of 196.9 mg g
−1 for Cr
3+ and of 217.4 mg g
−1 for Zn
2+, which are consistent with the experimental value of 297.5 mg g
−1 for Ni
2+, of 382.5 mg g
−1 for Cu
2+, of 195.0 mg g
−1 for Cr
3+ and of 216.3 mg g
−1 for Zn
2+. The large correlation coefficient (
R2 > 0.99) shows a good fit with the Langmuir isotherm, suggesting a monolayer adsorption
31 on the CHIFA (Table S10
†).
The Cu2+ adsorption capacity and efficiency in RFA, HIFA and CHIFA aerogels were evaluated by adsorption isotherms measurements. As shown in Fig. S10a,† the RFA, HIFA and CHIFA aerogels exhibits the highest Cu2+ sorption capacity of 158, 265 and 361 mg g−1 in the initial concentration (10–500 ppm), respectively. As shown in Fig. S10b,† CHIFA is faster to reach equilibrium than HIFA and HIFA is faster to reach equilibrium than RFA with the same initial concentration of 10 ppm.
To identify the interaction between CHIFA samples and heavy metal ions during the adsorption process, FT-IR spectra of the CHIFA before and after Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+ adsorption are compared (Fig. S10†). To elucidate the adsorption mechanism, the Density Functional Density (DFT)32–35 calculations were performed to investigate the interactions between CHIFA and Cu2+, the calculations were detailed in ESI.† The series of snapshots of Cu2+ adsorption are shown in Fig. 4. For Cu2+–carboxyl complex, the optimized geometry is obtained when the carboxyl unit and Cu2+ forms Cu2+–carboxyl complex through point-to-point interaction, as shown in Fig. 4c, the corresponding energy is 44.86 kJ mol−1 (Fig. S12a†). The equilibrium conformation of Cu2+–indole is the electron-deficient Cu2+ and the indole ring forming face-to-point cation–π configuration with the distance of 3.12 Å (Fig. S12b†), and the computational binding energy is 32.53 kJ mol−1 (Fig. S12b†). Additionally, hydroxyl group can adsorb Cu2+ through point-to-point interaction (Fig. S12c†). However, adsorbing of mobile Cu2+ by carboxyl and hydroxyl units is difficult because of the point-to-point binding area by only two atomistic sites. On the contrary, Cu2+ can be easily and rapidly adsorbed on indole ring due to its relatively large binding area through face-to-point cation–π interaction23,36 (Fig. 4b). Adsorption and desorption occur simultaneously, driven by thermal fluctuation. Once desorption occurs, the starting speed should be slow down compared with the bulk, leading to a high probability to be adsorbed by an adjacent carboxyl and hydroxyl units. The complexation of Cu2+ and carboxyl and hydroxyl, therefore, can be facilitated with the help of an adjacent indole, forming Cu2+–carboxyl and Cu2+–hydroxyl complex more easily and efficiently.
![image file: c9ra04467a-f4.tif](/image/article/2019/RA/c9ra04467a/c9ra04467a-f4.gif) |
| Fig. 4 DFT results to adsorb Cu2+ process involving synergistic face-to-point and point-to-point interactions. (a) A Cu2+ is adsorbed on the face of a π-electron-rich indole group via the face-to-point interaction. (b) The cation–π structure is obtained. (c) The desorbed Cu2+ can be adsorbed by an adjacent carboxyl group through point-to-point interaction. (d) Second Cu2+ comes close to the indole ring. (e) The desorbed Cu2+ can be adsorbed by the adjacent hydroxyl group through point-to-point interaction. (f) A stable conformation is formed. (g) Third Cu2+ comes close to the indole ring. (h) Three Cu2+, CHIFA formed a stable system. The white, gray, blue, and red spheres represent hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms, respectively. | |
Conclusions
In summary, we have rationally designed a new type of carboxylic-functional indole-based aerogel (CHIFA) that is easily prepared via a facile sol–gel technology involving phenolic resin-inspired chemistry, and we have demonstrated that the aerogel could be used as a high effective extraction material for heavy metals from aqueous solution through the synergistic effects of face–point and point–point interactions between the CHIFA network and heavy metals.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21504073, 21202134, 11447215). We thank the Southwest Computing Center of the China Academy of Physics Engineering for their support of computer simulation.
Notes and references
- R. P. Schwarzenbach, B. I. Escher, K. Fenner, T. B. Hofstetter, C. A. Johnson, U. V. Gunten and B. Wehrli, Science, 2006, 313, 1072 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- J. O. Nriagu and J. M. Pacyna, Nature, 1988, 333, 134 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- L. Liu, X. Guo, R. Tallon, X. Huang and J. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 881 RSC.
- P. Yang, L. Yang, J. Yang, X. Luo and G. Chang, High Perform. Polym., 2019, 31, 238 CrossRef CAS.
- L. Wang, D. Hu, X. Kong, J. Liu, X. Li, K. Zhou, H. Zhao and C. Zhou, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 346, 38 CrossRef CAS.
- M. R. Awual, I. M. M. Rahman, T. Yaita, M. A. Khaleque and M. Ferdows, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 236, 100 CrossRef CAS.
- Y. Shi, T. Zhang, H. Ren, A. Kruse and R. Cui, Bioresour. Technol., 2018, 247, 370 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. J. Hu, J. S. Wang, Y. G. Liu, X. Li, G. M. Zeng, Z. L. Bao, X. X. Zeng and F. Long, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 185, 306 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- R. Zarrougui, R. Mdimagh and N. Raouafi, J. Hazard. Mater, 2018, 342, 464 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- T. Saito, S. Brown, S. Chatterjee, J. Kim, C. Tsouris, R. T. Mayes, L. J. Kuo, G. Gill, Y. Oyola and C. J. Janke, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 14674 RSC.
- L. S. Oliveira, A. S. Franca, T. M. Alves and S. D. Rocha, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 155, 507 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- M. Kasanmascheff, W. Lee, T. U. Nick, J. A. Stubbe and M. Bennati, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 2170 RSC.
- A. Ma, A. Abushaikha, S. J. Allen and G. McKay, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 358, 1 CrossRef CAS.
- I. K. Moideen, A. M. Isloor, A. A. Qaiser, A. F. Ismail and M. S. Abdullah, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2018, 35, 1281 CrossRef CAS.
- G. Zhao, X. Huang, Z. Tang, Q. Huang, F. Niu and X. Wang, Polym. Chem., 2018, 9, 3562 RSC.
- H. Chen, J. Lin, N. Zhang, L. Chen, S. Zhong, Y. Wang, W. Zhang and Q. Ling, J. Hazard. Mater., 2018, 345, 1 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- B. Aguila, Q. Sun, J. A. Perman, L. D. Earl, C. W. Abney, R. Elzein, R. Schlaf and S. Ma, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1700665 CrossRef PubMed.
- B. Hayati, A. Maleki, F. Najafi, H. Daraei, F. Gharibi and G. McKay, J. Hazard. Mater., 2017, 336, 146 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- K. Kadirvelu, J. Goel and C. Rajagopal, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 153, 502 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- P. Rana, N. Mohan and C. Rajagopal, Water Res., 2004, 38, 2811 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- A. K. Meena, G. Mishra, P. Rai, C. Rajagopal and P. Nagar, J. Hazard. Mater., 2005, 122, 161 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- S. M. Alatalo, F. Pileidis, E. Mäkilä, M. Sevilla, E. Repo, J. Salonen, M. Sillanpää and M.-M. Titirici, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 25875 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- P. Yang, L. Yang, Y. Wang, L. Song, J. Yang and G. Chang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 531 RSC.
- O. Czakkel, K. Marthi, E. Geissler and K. László, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2005, 86, 124 CrossRef CAS.
- G. Leofanti, M. Padovan, G. Tozzola and B. Venturelli, Catal. Today, 1998, 90, 207 CrossRef.
- X. Zhu, S. M. Mahurin, S. H. An, C. L. Dothanh, C. Tian, Y. Li, L. W. Gill, E. W. Hagaman, Z. Bian and J. H. Zhou, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 7933 RSC.
- S. Azizian, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2004, 276, 47 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- T. Liu, M. Yang, T. Wang and Q. Yuan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51, 454 CrossRef CAS.
- P. Spasojevic, V. Panic, M. Jovic, J. Markovic, C. van Roost, I. Popovic and S. Velickovic, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 1680 RSC.
- M. N. K. Chowdhury, A. F. Ismail, M. D. H. Beg, G. Hegde and R. J. Gohari, New J. Chem., 2015, 39, 5823 RSC.
- A. Farrukh, A. Akram, A. Ghaffar, S. Hanif, A. Hamid, H. Duran and B. Yameen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5, 3784 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- G. Chang, Z. Shang, Y. Tao and L. Yang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 2517 RSC.
- W. Wei, G. Chang, Y. Xu and L. Yang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 18794 RSC.
- K. Wang, L. Yang, W. Wei, L. Zhang and G. Chang, J. Membr. Sci., 2018, 549, 23 CrossRef CAS.
- Y. Li, L. Yang, M. Du and G. Chang, Analyst, 2019, 144, 1260 RSC.
- G. Chang, Y. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Xu and L. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 9785 RSC.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Details of preparation and characterization of the RFA, HIFA and CHIFA aerogels; SEM image, nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the pore size distribution of RFA and HIFAs; kinetics data and sorption data of CHIFA toward Ni2+, Cu2+, Cr3+ and Zn2+. See DOI: 10.1039/c9ra04467a |
|
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |