Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Environmental separation and enrichment of gold and palladium ions by amino-modified three-dimensional graphene

Jing Li, Shaoxia Wang, Feng Wang, Xuran Wu and Xuming Zhuang*
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, China. E-mail: xmzhuang@iccas.ac.cn

Received 22nd December 2018 , Accepted 14th January 2019

First published on 21st January 2019


Abstract

The excellent adsorption properties of three-dimensional graphene (3DG) can be further enhanced by triethylenetetramine modification to increase its adsorption capacity for precious metal ions. Herein, we successfully synthesized an amino-modified 3DG (N-3DG) adsorbent with improved adsorption conditions with regards to pH value, dosage, and adsorption time. Adsorption equilibrium was reached at pH 3 over 120 min. In addition, the theoretical basis for the adsorption of N-3DG is provided by fitting the adsorption isotherm model. The synthesized material was tested in seawater and lake water samples for the adsorption of precious metals, namely Au(III) and Pd(II), achieving a recovery rate of 87% to 106% as assessed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Thus, N-3DG showed good adsorptivity. The present results indicate that N-3DG materials could have a viable application in environmental and sewage treatment in the near future.


1. Introduction

Precious metals (Ag, Au, Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt) have excellent corrosion resistance and highly stable chemical properties and are therefore widely used in various fields including agriculture, biomedicine, jewellery, catalysis, and electronic industries.1 To date, various methods are available for their separation and extraction such as ion exchange,2 coprecipitation, fire assay, solvent extraction,3,4 liquid membrane separation, and adsorbent separation,5 among others. In the past, most of the resin used as a matrix, and resin molecules6–8 were functionalized with chemical groups able to increase their adsorption capacity for precious metals. The subsequent chelation of precious metal ions from the aqueous solution led to the selective enrichment of metal ions, with their subsequent release under certain conditions.9

Recent studies have focused on the separation of adsorbents, as well as on the synthesis of new adsorbents, such as clay minerals, nanosized metal oxides (NMOs), nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI),10 layered double hydroxides (LDHs),11 layered metal sulfides (LMS), metal–organic frameworks (MOFs),10,12 activated carbon (AC), ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC), organic resins, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene oxides (GO), and polymer-based nanocomposites.13 These adsorbents are widely used in the removal of heavy metal ions and various pollutants, and achieved better adsorption effect. The adsorption properties of graphene-based materials have been extensively studied in recent years.

Graphene-based materials have been extensively studied in applications such as electrochemical catalysis,14,15 energy storage,16,17 electrochemical sensors,18–22 and other aspects. Three-dimensional graphene (3DG) is a recently developed three-dimensional structure carbonaceous material, constructed with small lamellar-size graphene.23 Compared to two-dimensional graphene, 3DG not only has a highly porous network structure, very low density, good adsorption, and an excellent mass transfer effect, but also has a high elasticity, flexibility, and lightness.24,25 Due to its extremely high adsorption capacity, Zheng et al. applied 3DG to the treatment of environmental sewage.26,27 Further, Bi et al.28 synthesized 3DG with a broad-spectrum absorption to petroleum products, fats, alkanes, toluene, and other organic solvents, without the need for further modification or treatment. The absorption efficiency of 3DG is 20 to 86 times of its weight, similar to or larger than that of polymers and expanded graphite. Zhao et al.29 reported the hydrothermal synthesis of 3DG for the removal of Cu2+, achieving a huge adsorption capacity of 228 mg g−1, 40 times higher than that of active carbon. Similarly, Liu et al.30 applied 3DG in the removal of methylene blue and methyl violet dyes, which are main contaminants from the dye manufacturing and textile finishing industry. The adsorption process showed that 3DG displays an adsorption capacity as high as 397 and 467 mg g−1 for methylene blue and methyl violet, respectively.

However, in the related literatures,5,31–33 few studies are available on the application of carbon nanomaterials in the adsorption of precious metals. In particular, the use of 3DG materials for the simultaneous adsorption of two precious metals has not yet been reported. Due to its porous structure, 3DG has abundant channels to provide storage space for the adsorption of precious metals. Therefore, we exploit this adsorptivity in the sequestration of precious metals from environmental samples.

The triethylenetetramine (NH2(CH2)2NH(CH2)2NH(CH2)2NH2, TETA) has many amino groups. Herein, a nucleophilic reaction occurred between the amino and epoxy groups on the surface of graphene oxide (GO). The adsorption site was added to enhance its adsorption ability.34 According to Pearson's theory35 of hard and soft acids and bases (HSAB), precious metal ions Au(III)and Pd(II) belongs to soft acid, and they are easy to coordinate with ligand such as N, S, and so on,36 and form stable chelates. The solitary-pair electrons on the nitrogen atom have certain chelating ability to metal ions, and the precious metals all have the unfilled d orbitals, which is advantageous to the chelation reaction between them. Therefore, the adsorption ability of 3DG to precious metals can be improved by amino modification. The three-dimensional structure was synthesized by a self-assembly hydrothermal reaction and vacuum freeze-drying technology for the adsorption of precious metals.37,38

2. Experimental section

2.1 Materials and reagents

GO was purchased from Chengdu Organic Chemicals Co., Ltd. The standard solutions of Au(III) and Pd(II) were supplied by NCS Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd. TETA was bought from Tianjin Pinnacle Chemical Co., Ltd. (≥95% purity). Ammonium hydroxide was obtained from International Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (25–28% purity). All water in the laboratory was ultrapure water (18.25 MΩ cm).

2.2 Instruments

The mass of adsorbent was measured using an electronic balance (AR2130, Ohaus International Trade (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.) with an accuracy of 0.1 mg. pH measurements were performed using a digital pH meter (PHS-3C, Shanghai, China). The metal ion concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES; ICAP-6300, Thermo Electron Corporation, USA) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent 7700x, Agilent, USA).

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was performed on a FTIR-84005 (Shimadzu, Japan) spectrometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a field emission scanning electron microanalyzer (S-4800, Hitachi, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were obtained using an X-ray diffractometer to determine the crystal phase composition of the sample (XRD6000, Shimadzu, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) analysis was tested with an ESCALAB 250Xi (Thermo, USA). Elemental content analysis by CHN elemental analysis with EURO EA 3000 (Iveco, Italy). Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) used to measurement of the specific surface area of materials (ASAP2020, Micromeritics, USA). Hydrothermal reactors (KLJX-8A, Yantai, China) and vacuum freeze dryers (GLZ-0.4 Shanghai) were used for the synthesis of the materials, and a water-bathing constant temperature vibrator (DKZ-2, Shanghai, China) was used in the adsorption experiments.

2.3 Synthesis of amino-modified 3DG (N-3DG)

GO (200 mg) was dissolved in 25.0 mL of ultrapure water for 30 min and transferred into the inner tank of a polytetrafluoroethylene reactor, followed by the addition of 6.0 mL of TETA. Ammonium hydroxide (0.1 mol L−1) was used to adjust the pH at 11. The inner tank was placed within the stainless-steel hydrothermal reactor and heated at 180 °C for 24 h. The tank was then removed and cooled to room temperature, then wash it with ultrapure water for three times.

N-3DG was then freeze-dried for 72 h, producing a dry and loose porous N-3DG powder.

2.4 Adsorption studies

Adsorption experiments were performed using the batch method, wherein a given amount of N-3DG was added to 15.0 mL of 5.0 μg mL−1 Au(III) and Pd(II) standard solutions mixture, changed the pH (1 mol L−1 hydrochloride and ammonium hydroxide) and the amount of adsorbent. The mixtures were placed in constant oscillation at 120 rpm in a vibrator. The concentration of Au(III) and Pd(II) ions in the solution were determined by ICP-AES. Under the same conditions, standard solutions of Au(III) and Pd(II) without any adsorbent were used as blank controls. The effects of pH value, dosage, and adsorption time as fellow on the adsorption rate were investigated. The standard solutions used for adsorption were all from standard solution (1000 mg L−1) dilution. The adsorption capacity was calculated according to the following formulae:39
 
image file: c8ra10506e-t1.tif(1)
 
image file: c8ra10506e-t2.tif(2)
 
image file: c8ra10506e-t3.tif(3)
where qe (mg g−1) is the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent, C0 (mg L−1) and Ce (mg L−1) are the initial and final concentrations of metal ions in aqueous solution, respectively, image file: c8ra10506e-t4.tif (mg L−1) is the concentration of precious metals in the solution after elution, v (L) is the volume of the aqueous solutions, and m (g) is the mass of the adsorbent.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Characterization of N-3DG

Characterization of synthesized N-3DG by SEM, XPS, BET, FT-IR and XRD, CHN. SEM image of GO (Fig. 1A) and N-3DG (Fig. 1B) showed the wrinkled structure of the GO and network structure of N-3DG, respectively. This observation was attributed to the surface defects caused by the oxidation of graphene, resulting in wrinkle curl, bringing in oxygen-containing functional groups40 providing more reaction sites.41 The structures contribute to the large surface area of N-3DG, and exhibited cross-linking between the sheets to form a three-dimensional network structure, leading to the formation of pores and increasing the specific surface area of the material. The specific surface area of the N-3DG was measured by N2 adsorption–desorption experiment. The specific surface area of the N-3DG was 291.592 m2 g−1 under the condition of adsorption isotherm at 77 K. The pore volume and pore size are 0.843 cm3 g−1, 5.623 nm and consistent with SEM results. The results showed that the N-3DG has large specific surface area. The larger the specific surface area, the more the adsorption sites are, and the adsorption capacity of theoretically adsorbent material is greater.
image file: c8ra10506e-f1.tif
Fig. 1 SEM images of (a) GO, (b) N-3DG.

FT-IR spectra of GO showed the characteristic absorption peaks of GO, namely the stretching vibration absorption peak of the O–H group at 3432 cm−142 and the C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching vibration absorption peak at 1727 cm−143,44 (Fig. 2A(a)), indicating that the GO contains more oxygen-containing functional groups. FT-IR spectra of N-3DG showed the characteristic absorption peaks of the C–H stretching vibration of CH2 at 2975 cm−1 and 2915 cm−1, the C–N stretching vibration absorption peak at 1038 cm−1, as well as the N–H vibration and C–N stretching vibration absorption peaks of C–NH–C at 1650 cm−1 and 1543 cm−1, respectively (Fig. 2A(b)). Conversely, the sharp characteristic absorption peak intensity of the epoxy group at 1038 cm−1 was weakened, indicating that TETA was functionalized onto the GO surface through chemical bond formation.

The XRD pattern of GO showed a very sharp peak at 2θ = 11.3°, which is characteristic for the (001) plane of graphene, with broad and strong diffraction occurring at 2θ = 24.9° attributed to the graphene (002) plane (Fig. 2B(a)). The (001) peak of GO disappeared in N-3DG, while a higher peak appeared at 25.2° (Fig. 2B(b)), indicating that hydrothermal synthesis led to the reduction of GO.45 Thus, the results showed that the GO sheet was peeled off and therefore the GO surface was modified.

In order to further prove the synthetic material, the N-3DG was tested by XPS. Fig. 2C is the full spectrum of N-3DG. It can be observed from Fig. 2C that there is peak at the binding energy of 285 eV, 400 eV, 532 eV, corresponding to C1s, N1s and O1s orbitals, respectively. The N1s peak in 399.1 eV shows that N atom is doped into the graphite thin crystal structure. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of N1s (Fig. 2D) as shown, in which the peaks of N1s can be broken down into three peaks at 398.2 eV, 399.5 eV, and 401.3 eV. The nitrogen element has three different forms. Where 398.2 eV corresponds to pyridinic N, 399.5 eV to pyrrolic N, 401.3 eV to graphitic N.46,47 At the same time, the content of C atom was calculated to be 71.78% and the content of N atom was 3.08% and the content of N atom was 12.46% by CHN element analysis.


image file: c8ra10506e-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (A) FT-IR and (B) XRD spectra of (a) GO, (b) N-3DG, respectively. The (C) XPS spectra and (D) N1s region of N-3DG.

Combined with the above characterization methods, we successfully modified graphene oxide and synthesized three-dimensional structure.

3.2 Effect of pH, adsorption time, and dosage on adsorption

The experimental results showed that the optimum pH for adsorption of Au(III) and Pd(II) by N-3DG was within the ranges of 2.0 to 4.0 and 3.0 to 5.0, respectively. The adsorption rate of Au(III) was slightly higher than that of Pd(II) (Fig. 3A). Changes in pH had a great effect on the adsorption of composite materials. The selective adsorption depends on the properties of the complex groups, the electronic configuration of metal elements, and the composition of the measured components of the complexes.49 Meanwhile, the adsorption of precious metal ions by adsorbents depends largely on the valence state of the metal ions.48 Formation of chloride complex anion valence state by precious metal ions and hydrochloric acid (low pH), coordination might occur between amino group and valence state of chloro complex anion.50 In order to obtain the proper valence state of the metal ions, and for the purpose of adsorption the two precious metals simultaneously. Therefore, a pH value of 3 was chosen as the ideal adsorption acidity.
image file: c8ra10506e-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Effect of pH (A), adsorption time (B) and dosage (C) on adsorption by N-3DG at 298 K.

The adsorption capacity of N-3DG for precious metal ions was dependent on adsorption time (Fig. 3B). As the adsorption reaction time increased, the adsorption rate also increased relatively rapidly up to 60 min, reaching an adsorption equilibrium at 120 min. Therefore, the optimal adsorption time was determined to be 120 min.

With regards to the optimization of adsorbent dosage, the adsorption rate of the two precious metals increased with increasing N-3DG concentration at pH = 3 and an initial concentration of 5 μg mL−1 (Fig. 3C). When the dosage reached 5.0 mg mL−1, the adsorption amount reached a maximum value, with no further increases regardless of increasing adsorbent concentration.

3.3 Isotherms

The adsorption isotherm is used to describe the adsorption equilibrium and the interaction between adsorbents and adsorbents. The Langmuir adsorption model assumes that monolayers are adsorbed, and the adsorbed molecules do not interact with the molecules in the solution to form an immobile adsorption layer. The Freundlich adsorption model assumes that adsorption occurs on the heterogeneous surface and the adsorption process occurs in the multimolecular layer.

The adsorption of metal ions on N-3DG was simulated using the Langmuir and Freundlich equations, as follows:51

 
qe = qmKLCe/(1 + KLCe) (4)
 
image file: c8ra10506e-t5.tif(5)
where qm (mg g−1) is the maximum amount of metal ions adsorbed per unit weight of N-3DG at the equilibrium ion concentration, KL is a constant related to the free energy of adsorption, and KF and n are Freundlich constants related to the adsorption capacity and the adsorption intensity, respectively.

Isotherm parameters were obtained by fitting the adsorption equilibrium data to the isotherm models (Fig. 4 and isotherm parameters in Table 1). According to the linear correlation coefficient (R2), the degree of conformity of the model to the experimental data is judged. It is calculated that the corresponding R2 is larger, indicating that the adsorption process is more consistent. According to Table 1, the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model of Au(III), Pd(II) (Fig. 4A and C) obtained R2 of 0.9773 and 0.9669, respectively, and Freundlich isothermal model (Fig. 4B and D) fitted R2 were 0.9914 and 0.9972, respectively. The data indicated a better fit by the Freundlich adsorption isotherm model for the adsorption of Au(III), Pd(II) by N-3DG, likely due to monolayer adsorption. The values of n are all greater than 1, indicating that both Au(III) and Pd(II) are easily adsorbed.


image file: c8ra10506e-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Adsorption isotherms model for Au(III) and Pd(II) onto N-3DG (0.2 mg L−1 to 4.0 mg L−1) at pH = 3, 2 h, 298 K. (A) and (B) are the Langmuir isotherm models of Au(III) and Pd(II). (C) and (D) are the Freundlich isotherm models of Au(III) and Pd(II), respectively.
Table 1 Adsorption isotherm parameters for Au(III), Pd(II) onto N-3DG (0.2 mg L−1 to 4.0 mg L−1) at pH = 3, 2 h, 298 K
Ions Langmuir Freundlich
qm KL R2 KF n R2
Au(III) 3.1104 3.1123 0.9773 2.1261 2.1177 0.9914
Pd(II) 4.2535 0.2443 0.9689 0.7804 1.1868 0.9972


Further, KF is a relative adsorption capacity, and the larger the KF, the easier the adsorption is at the equilibrium concentration. It can be seen from Table 1 that the KF of Au(III) is 2.1261, and the KF of Pd(II) is 0.7804. In combination with Fig. 3C, the adsorption rate of Au(III) is greater than the adsorption rate of Pd(II), which indicate the adsorption of the adsorbent on Au(III) is easier.

The results indicate that both Au(III) and Pd(II) are easily adsorbed, suggesting a chemical adsorption process, wherein the metal ions are chelated onto the N-3DG surface.

3.4 Influence of interference ions on adsorption properties

The effects of interference ions on the adsorption properties of Au(III) and Pd(II) were investigated by simulated experiments. The concentrations of Au(III) and Pd(II) in solution were both 0.5 mg L−1. Adding N-3DG adsorbents was 11 mg, the experimental results showed that the interference ion included Zn(II), Mg(II), Fe(III) and Ca(II), Cu(II), Al(III), K+, Na+, were 20 times and 100 times respectively. There was no interference in the determination of Au(III) and Pd(II).

3.5 Eluent experiment

The adsorption of Au(III) was facilitated by its complexation with the –NH2 functional group of TETA to form a stable complex. Therefore, hydrochloric acid (15.0 mL) and thiourea (1 mol L−1, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) were used as the adsorbents to investigate the desorption effect of precious metals Au(III) and Pd(II) adsorbed by N-3DG.

3.6 Application to real samples

Environmental water samples were retrieved from Sanyuan Lake of Yantai University (lake water) and the East Gate Beach of Yantai University (sea water) to assess the systems applicability in real conditions.

The experiments were performed using 500 mL of the water samples and static placement for 2 h. A 15.0 mL sample of the supernatant was placed in the Teflon tank for microwave digestion and cooled to room temperature for use. The alternating magnetic field produced by microwave makes the medium molecules ionize. The sample preparation time is shortened to ensure the accuracy of the test results. Subsequently, 5.0 mg mL−1 of N-3DG were ultrasonically dispersed for 30 min, added 15.0 mL treated lake samples, and the Au(III) and Pd(II) standard solution mixture (2.0 μg mL−1 and 5.0 μg mL−1, respectively) was added. The pH was adjusted to 3.0 and the solution was shaken for 120 min. The aqueous solution was then vacuum-filtered and the residue was eluted with hydrochloric acid and thiourea (1 mol L−1, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) for 120 min. The Au(III) and Pd(II) contents in the filtrate were measured by ICP-MS and the elution rate was calculated. The results (Table 2) showed that the recovery rates were all above 80%.

Table 2 Actual sample measured value and recoveries (%) (n = 6)
Samples Ions Add amount (μg mL−1) Actual value (μg mL−1) Recovery (%)
Lake Au(III) 0
2 1.91 96
5 4.60 92
Pd(II) 0
2 2.12 106
5 4.52 90
Seawater Au(III) 0
2 1.94 97
5 4.76 95
Pd(II) 0
2 1.73 87
5 4.67 93


4. Conclusions

Herein, we synthesized an material, N-3DG, with a suitable adsorption capacity for precious metals. –NH2 modification on the surface of graphene and the formation of a rich three-dimensional pore structure were confirmed by SEM, XPS, BET, FT-IR and XRD, CHN. Combined with the above characterization methods, N-3DG was synthesized successfully. The most suitable conditions for the adsorption of Au(III) and Pd(II) by N-3DG were at a pH of 3.0, reaching adsorption equilibrium after 120 min. The adsorption of Au(III), Pd(II) was better fitted by a Freundlich isotherm, which might be multi-molecular adsorption. And it could be eluted by an eluent of thiourea and hydrochloric acid. In addition, it was applied to the adsorption separation of actual samples, the results showed that the recovery rates were all above 80%, thus demonstrating that N-3DG could be applied to the adsorption of actual samples.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21575122, 21778047).

References

  1. D. Nagai and T. Kimoto, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 103304 RSC.
  2. A. Nalaparaju and J. Jiang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 6925 CrossRef CAS.
  3. H. Hasegawa, S. Barua, T. Wakabayashi, A. Mashio, T. Maki, Y. Furusho and I. M. M. Rahman, Microchem. J., 2018, 139, 174 CrossRef CAS.
  4. M. Tian, F. Mu, Q. Jia, X. Quan and W. Liao, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2011, 56, 2225 CrossRef CAS.
  5. L. Liu, C. Li, C. Bao, Q. Jia, P. Xiao, X. Liu and Q. Zhang, Talanta, 2012, 93, 350 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. Y. Bulut and Z. Baysal, J. Environ. Manage., 2006, 78, 107 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. F. Xie, Z. Fan, Q. Zhang and Z. Luo, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013, 130, 3937 CrossRef CAS.
  8. H. Zhang and D. B. Dreisinger, Hydrometallurgy, 2004, 72, 225 CrossRef CAS.
  9. H. Wang, C. Bao, F. Li, X. Kong and J. Xu, Microchim. Acta, 2010, 168, 99 CrossRef CAS.
  10. Y. Wu, H. Pang, Y. Liu, X. Wang, S. Yu, D. Fu, J. Chen and X. Wang, Environ. Pollut., 2019, 246, 608 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. P. Gu, S. Zhang, X. Li, X. Wang, T. Wen, R. Jehan, A. Alsaedi, T. Hayat and X. Wang, Environ. Pollut., 2018, 240, 493 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. J. Li, X. Wang, G. Zhao, C. Chen, Z. Chai, A. Alsaedi, T. Hayat and X. Wang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 2322 RSC.
  13. G. Zhao, X. Huang, Z. Tanga, Q. Huang, F. Niua and X. Wang, Polym. Chem., 2018, 9, 3562 RSC.
  14. D. Jang, S. Lee, S. Kim, K. Choi, S. Park, J. Oh and S. Park, ChemNanoMat, 2018, 4, 118 CrossRef CAS.
  15. X. Zhang, D. Liu, L. Yang, L. Zhou and T. You, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 10031 RSC.
  16. H. Wang, X. Yuan, Z. Zeng, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, Q. Jiang and S. Gu, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2016, 47, 41 Search PubMed.
  17. I. V. Lightcap and P. V. Kamat, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 2235 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. F. Luan, S. Zhang, D. Chen, K. Zheng and X. Zhuang, Talanta, 2018, 182, 529 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. F. Luan, S. Zhang, F. Wei and X. Zhuang, Microchem. J., 2018, 143, 450 CrossRef CAS.
  20. C. Tian, L. Wang, F. Luan and X. Zhuang, Talanta, 2019, 191, 103 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. X. Zhuang, D. Chen, S. Zhang, F. Luan and L. Chen, Microchim. Acta, 2018, 185, 166 CrossRef PubMed.
  22. D. Chen, X. Zhuang, J. Zhai, Y. Zheng, H. Lu and L. Chen, Sens. Actuators, B, 2018, 255, 1500 CrossRef CAS.
  23. W. Meng, X. Duan, Y. Xu and X. Duan, ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 7231 CrossRef PubMed.
  24. X. H. Xia, D. L. Chao, Y. Q. Zhang, Z. X. Shen and H. J. Fan, Nano Today, 2014, 9, 785 CrossRef CAS.
  25. S. Mao, G. Lu and J. Chen, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 6924 RSC.
  26. X. Zheng, X. Xiong, J. Yang, D. Chen, R. Jian and L. Lin, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 333, 153 CrossRef.
  27. C. Santhosh, V. Velmurugan, G. Jacob, G. Jeong, S. K. Jeong, A. N. Grace and A. Bhatnagar, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 306, 1116 CrossRef CAS.
  28. H. Bi, X. Xie, K. Yin, Y. Zhou, S. Wan, L. He, F. Xu, F. Banhart, L. Sun and R. S. Ruoff, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2012, 22, 4421 CrossRef CAS.
  29. L. Zhao, B. Yu, F. Xue, J. Xie, X. Zhang, R. Wu, R. Wang, Z. Hu and S. T. Yang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2015, 286, 449 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. F. Liu, S. Chung, G. Oh and T. S. Seo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 922 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. L. Yang, F. Jia and S. Song, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2017, 186, 63 CrossRef CAS.
  32. S. Rangel, L. F. Magana and L. E. Sansores, ChemPhysChem, 2014, 15, 4042 CrossRef PubMed.
  33. L. Yang, F. Jia, B. Yang and S. Song, Results Phys., 2017, 7, 4089 CrossRef.
  34. B. Fotoohi and L. Mercier, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2015, 139, 14 CrossRef CAS.
  35. R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1963, 85, 3533–3539 CAS.
  36. H. L. Ma, Y. Zhang, Q. H. Hu, D. Yan, Z. Z. Yu and M. Zhai, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 5914 RSC.
  37. X. Zhang, Z. Sui, B. Xu, S. Yue, Y. Luo, W. Zhan and B. Liu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 6494 RSC.
  38. M. A. Worsley, P. J. Pauzauskie, T. Y. Olson, J. Biener, J. H. Satcher and T. F. Baumann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 14067 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. S. Karkar, S. Debnath, P. De, K. Parashar, K. Pillay, P. Sashikumar and U. C. Ghosh, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 306, 269 CrossRef.
  40. J. Chen, Q. Chen and Q. Ma, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2012, 370, 32 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. M. Veerapandian, M. H. Lee, K. Krishnamoorthy and K. Yun, Carbon, 2012, 50, 4228 CrossRef CAS.
  42. D. S. Sutar, P. K. Narayanam, G. Singh, V. D. Botcha, S. S. Talwar, R. S. Srinivasa and S. S. Major, Thin Solid Films, 2012, 520, 5991 CrossRef CAS.
  43. G. Wang, B. Wang, J. Park, J. Yang, X. Shen and J. Yao, Carbon, 2009, 47, 68 CrossRef CAS.
  44. J. Ma, C. Liu, R. Li and J. Wang, e-Polym., 2012, 33, 386 Search PubMed.
  45. A. V. Murugan, T. Muraliganth and A. Manthiram, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 2692 CrossRef CAS.
  46. X. Li, H. Wang, J. T. Robinson, H. Sanchez, G. Diankov and H. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 15939 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. L. Sun, L. Wang, C. Tian, T. Tan, Y. Xie, K. Shi, M. Li and H. Fu, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 4498 RSC.
  48. S. C. W. Sakti, D. Siswanta and N. Nuryono, Pure Appl. Chem., 2012, 85, 211 Search PubMed.
  49. G. V. Myasoedova, I. I. Antokol Skaja and S. B. Savvin, Talanta, 1985, 32, 1105 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  50. S. B. Savvin, I. I. Antokol Skaja, G. V. Myasoedova, L. I. Bolshakova and O. P. Shvoeva, J. Chromatogr. A, 1974, 102, 287 CrossRef CAS.
  51. V. Subramanyan and L. Jothinathan, RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 27045 RSC.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019