Yiran Jin‡
ab,
Tingting Tian‡a,
Yinghua Maa,
Ludan Houa,
Shuai Guana,
Wenjing Suna,
Yingfeng Du*a and
Lantong Zhang*a
aDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, P. R. China. E-mail: yingfengdu@hotmail.com; zhanglantong@263.net; Fax: +86-311-86266419; Tel: +86-311-86265625
bThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P. R. China
First published on 11th January 2019
In this paper, an analytical strategy combined data acquisition with a practical mining strategy aimed at rapid characterization and quantitation of ent-kaurane diterpenoids in Isodon japonica using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-triple time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS). First, an effective self-built filter template based on drug phase I/II metabolic reaction theory and a components library data set were established. Second, the mass spectra of ent-kaurane diterpenoid standards were studied and their mass spectrum cleavage pathways were summarized. Next, the methanol extract of this herb was studied by data-independent acquisition mode (DIA). With the aid of a self-built filter template, the peaks of ent-kaurane diterpenoids were easily picked out and rapidly classified as ent-kaurane diterpenoids from a complex matrix. A total of 24 ent-kaurane diterpenoids were structurally identified. Meanwhile, the self-built filter template provided a convenient and fast method for the structural characterization and Isodon japonica was used to illustrate this approach for the first time. Furthermore, eight major bioactive diterpenoids were simultaneously quantified by a newly developed superimposed multiple product ion (SMPI) with UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS method. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed significant differences in different batches of samples. These combined qualitative and quantitative methods were used to provide a potential approach for the holistic quality evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and its preparations.
Generally, efficacies of TCM are based on collective effects of many components even minor or trace material. Hundreds of chemical ingredients are contained in one herbal medicine, so applying a single approach for a comprehensive quality control of TCM is very difficult. Therefore, it is important that ent-kaurane diterpenoids are used as marker components for defining the pharmacodynamic material and for reinforcing the holistic quality control of Isodon japonica.
LC-MS has been considered as a powerful and efficient means for the qualitative and quantitative determination of ingredients.11–13 Though there have been a few reports about analyzing ent-kaurane diterpenoids by LC-MS,14–16 it is difficult to simultaneously analyze many unknown and trace components in complex matrices using conservative LC-MS method. Recently, triple time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-TOF-MS) are widely applied for qualitative studies because they have many advantages of plentiful structure-related information, the exact mass and fragmentation patterns in a highly sensitive and convenient manner.17 Currently, the fragmentation behavior and pathways of few ent-kaurane diterpenoids has been studied by TOF-MS.18–20 However, identification and quantitation of ent-kaurane diterpenoids in Isodon japonica or other plants by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS has not been reported.
Available acquisition techniques usually include dependent acquisition (DDA) and data independent acquisition (DIA) in Q-TOF-MS.21 DDA method could automatically acquire data by massive trigger events. In recent years, DIA strategies have been developed, which brings about the acquisition of all ions present at any time in the chromatographic separation in the MS/MS spectrum.22 Meanwhile, identification of the active ingredients of TCM using a LC-MS method was primarily based on characteristic fragment ions combined with manual inspection. However, there are many drawbacks of time consuming and omission due to high background noise. In order to solve this problem, several post-acquisition data mining methods were usually to hunt the possible target compounds. Other than, drug metabolites could be locked quickly based on a well-defined and specified mass defect limits between the target drug and its metabolites. Drug metabolites are generated through the same biochemical mechanisms and thus have analogous mass defects and similar substructures as the parent drug. Similarly, the ingredients in medicinal herbs can be divided into many families, and compounds in the same core structure usually have the same skeleton or substituents.23 Therefore, an appropriate self-built template based on drug phase I/II metabolic reaction theory was established for the fast identification of the composition of the homologues in natural plant extracts by settings a consideration of the reference filter and matching substituents. It is convinced that the unrelated ions could be rapidly and automatically removed from a complex chemical background by an appropriate self-built template range. The eligible compounds were obtained automatically by filtration of complex signals through self-built template for the herbal extracts after DIA scan. Because there were the huge differences in concentration and the different types of components in TCM, it was very difficult to find a method to balance these relationships. In this study, we developed a superimposed multiple product ions (SMPI) LC-Q-TOF method, which has high quantitative resolution with TOF-MS/MS identification to eliminate interferences. According to these considerations, a combination of the above methods was developed and applied to identify and quantify the trace compounds in Isodon japonica. And the data obtained from quantitative analysis were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) to estimate the chemical constituents of various geographical locations, plant fractions and collection time.
Oridonin was obtained from Zelang Co. Ltd. (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Hebeirubesensin K, enmenol, henryin, lasiodonin, glaucocalyxin A, ponicidin and rabdoternin A were separated from different Isodon herbs and donated by Professor Jixia Zhang from Henan Xinxiang Medical University. The contents of these ingredients were above 98% by HPLC. Generally, ent-kaurane diterpenoids are classified into two subtypes: C-20 non-oxygenated subtype (group 1) and C-20 oxygenated subtype (group 2). Group 2 can be further divided into monoepoxy ent-kauranes (group 2–1), diepoxy ent-kauranes (group 2–2) and C-20 oxygenated nonepoxy ring ent-kaurane diterpenoids (group 2–3). Among the 8 references, glaucocalyxin A (14) belonged to group 1; hebeirubescensin K (1), enmenol (4), lasiodonin (6), oridonin (13) and rabdoternin A (24) were included in group 2–1; ponicidin (3) belonged to group 2–2; and henryin (12) belonged to group 2–3.
Thirty-one batches of Isodon japonica were obtained from Chinese various locations and they were from cultivated plantations (Table 1). All plant specimens were identified and conserved in the specimen room of the Pharmacy School (Hebei Medical University).
Sample | Source | Collecting time | Sample | Source | Collecting time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | Shexian, Hebei | 2017.08 | S17 | Taihangshan, Shanxi | 2017.08 |
S2 | Shexian, Hebei | 2017.08 | S18 | Taihangshan, Shanxi | 2017.09 |
S3 | Shexian, Hebei | 2017.09 | S19 | Huixian, Henan | 2017.08 |
S4 | Taihangshan, Shanxi | 2017.07 | S20 | Huixian, Henan | 2017.08 |
S5 | Taihangshan, Shanxi | 2017.08 | S21 | Huixian, Henan | 2017.09 |
S6 | Taihangshan, Shanxi | 2017.09 | S22 | Zunhua, Hubei | 2017.07 |
S7 | Huixian, Henan | 2017.08 | S23 | Zunhua, Hubei | 2017.08 |
S8 | Huixian, Henan | 2017.08 | S24 | Zunhua, Hubei | 2017.09 |
S9 | Huixian, Henan | 2017.09 | S25 | Zunhua, Hubei | 2017.09 |
S10 | Zunhua, Hubei | 2017.07 | S26 | Jiutai, Jilin | 2017.08 |
S11 | Zunhua, Hubei | 2017.08 | S27 | Jiutai, Jilin | 2018.09 |
S12 | Zunhua, Hubei | 2017.09 | S28 | Jiutai, Jilin | 2017.08 |
S13 | Shexian, Hebei | 2017.08 | S29 | Jiutai, Jilin | 2017.09 |
S14 | Shexian, Hebei | 2017.08 | S30 | Anshan, Liaoning | 2017.09 |
S15 | Shexian, Hebei | 2017.09 | S31 | Anshan, Liaoning | 2017.09 |
S16 | Taihangshan, Shanxi | 2018.07 |
Mass spectrometry was executed on a Triple TOF™ 5600+ system with Duo-Spray™ ion sources operating in the negative electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. Analyst® TF 1.7 software was used to control the instrument and for data acquisition as well as analysis.
For the qualitative analysis, an MS/MS mass spectrum can be acquired from the fragmentation of a precursor ion by the DIA method i.e. SWATH techniques. The SWATH method (cycle time, 1900 ms) was composed of a TOF MS scan (accumulation time, 250 ms) and a series of product ion scans (accumulation time, 60 ms) in the high-sensitivity mode. Thirty SWATH quadrupole isolation windows were 30 Da wide ranging from 300 to 500 Da. Besides, the CE was set at −35 eV, and the CES was 20 eV in the MS/MS experiments. The nebulizer gas (gas 1), heater gas (gas 2) and curtain gas were set at 55, 55 and 35 psi, respectively. Furthermore, the MS and the MS/MS scans were automatically adjusted and calibrated using calibration delivery system (CDS) (Table 2).
Analyte | tR (min) | MW | MS (m/z) | MS/MS (m/z) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a MW: Molecular weight. | ||||
Hebeirubescensin K | 5.98 | 366.2042 | 365.2 | 347.1811 + 317.1753 |
Enmenol | 6.07 | 366.2042 | 365.2 | 347.1864 + 317.1777 |
Henryin | 7.23 | 392.2199 | 391.2 | 373.2045 + 331.1909 |
Lasiodonin | 7.40 | 364.1886 | 363.2 | 345.1690 + 333.1696 |
Oridonin | 7.66 | 364.1886 | 363.2 | 345.1695 + 333.1706 |
Glaucocalyxin A | 7.85 | 332.1988 | 331.1 | 313.1802 + 285.1850 |
Ponicidin | 8.43 | 362.1729 | 361.3 | 343.1555 + 297.1495 |
Rabdoternin A | 9.81 | 364.1886 | 363.2 | 345.1714 + 255.1770 |
In subsequent quantitative analysis, the superimposed multiple product ions (SMPI) LC-Q-TOF transitions of 8 constituents in high-resolution MS data for each sample were acquired by TOF-MS mode. The collision energy (CE) was set at −35 eV, and the collision energy spread (CES) was 0 eV and accumulation time, 100 ms. The other conditions were the same as above. The transitions of 8 constituents in Isodon japonica are listed in ESI Table 2.†
Through preparing six replications from the Isodon japonica samples (S1) in one day, the intra-day precisions were obtained. The same step was operated once every day for 3 consecutive days to test inter-day precision. The repeatability was confirmed with six independent sample S1 solutions, and variation was expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD, %).
The recovery experiment was performed using a known amount of mixed reference solutions with three different concentrations (high, middle and low) added to the known amount of sample S1 and extracted and analyzed using the above method. Triplicate samples were extracted at each concentration. The following formula was used to evaluate the average recoveries: (total detected amount − original amount)/added amount × 100%. To assess the stability of the sample, the sample S1 solutions were kept in the autosampler (4 °C) and detected at different time points (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h).
No | tR (min) | Formula | [M − H]− | Error (ppm) | Fragment ions in negative mode | Identification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Compounds identified by comparison with reference standards. | ||||||
1a | 4.89 | C20H30O6 | 365.1965 | −1.3 | 347.1811, 335.1835, 329.1752, 317.1753, 299.1674, 285.1508, 281.1517 | Hebeirubescensin K |
2 | 4.97 | C20H26O5 | 345.1706 | −0.3 | 327.1608, 301.1811, 299.1645, 283.1686, 271.1369 | 7β,10α-7-Hydroxy-1,15-dioxokaur-16-en-18-oci acid |
3a | 5.57 | C20H26O6 | 361.1650 | −1.9 | 343.1555, 325.1455, 297.1495, 281.1545, 271.1699, 255.1385, 253.2600, 149.0603 | Ponicidin |
4a | 5.58 | C20H30O6 | 365.1964 | −1.6 | 347.1864, 335.1844, 329.1742, 317.1777, 299.1664, 281.1530 | Enmenol |
5 | 6.61 | C26H42O9 | 497.2757 | 0.3 | 497.2777, 479.2671, 335.2221, 317.2115 | (5β,8α,9β,11β,13α)-11,13,15-Trihydroxykaur-16-en-3-yl beta-D-allopyranoside. |
6a | 7.55 | C20H28O6 | 363.1807 | −1.8 | 345.1690, 333.1696, 327.1589, 309.1482, 315.1592, 299.1638297.1497, 281.1532 | Lasiodonin |
7a | 8.90 | C22H32O7 | 407.2070 | −1.2 | 347.1860, 361.1661, 329.1725, 311.1653, 299.1650, 281.1562, 271.1695 | Sodoponin |
8 | 8.91 | C20H32O4 | 335.2225 | −0.7 | 317.2126, 299.2180, 289.2180, 271.2061 | Glaucocalyxin F |
9 | 9.44 | C20H30O5 | 349.2028 | 0.1 | 331.1919, 313.1821, 303.1968, 295.1758 | Rabdoinflexin B |
10 | 9.65 | C20H30O4 | 333.2065 | −1.8 | 315.1955, 297.1844, 289.2166, 287.2009, 271.2057, 149.0614 | Umbrosin A |
11 | 10.34 | C20H26O5 | 347.1705 | −0.9 | 327.1596, 317.1782, 309.1491, 301.1818, 283.1703 | 7α,14β -7,14-Dihydroxykaur-16-ene-3,11,15-trione |
12a | 10.38 | C22H32O6 | 391.2128 | 0.1 | 373.2045, 331.1909, 313.1805, 295.1679, 287.2007, 269.1897267.1789, 149.0609, 59.0162 | Henryin |
13a | 10.407 | C20H28O6 | 363.1808 | −1.4 | 345.1695, 333.1706, 327.1593, 315.1600, 309.1490, 299.1646, 297.1497, 283.1697, 281.1542, 271.1688, 265.1589, 253.1570, 149.0605 | Oridonin |
14a | 10.41 | C20H28O4 | 331.1913 | −0.6 | 269.1906, 149.0598 | Glaucocalyxin A |
15 | 10.43 | C20H28O5 | 347.1864 | −0.6 | 347.1857, 329.1776, 311.1653, 301.1775, 299.1651, 285.1848, 283.1718 | 1α,7β,14β-Trihydroxy-7α,20-epoxykaur-16-en-15-one |
16 | 11.6 | C20H32O4 | 335.2223 | −1.6 | 317.2116, 307.2272, 289.2161, 271.2100 | 2β,7α,14β-Trihydroxykaur-15-one |
17 | 12.15 | C20H32O4 | 333.2068 | −1.0 | 315.1958, 305.2102, 297.1840, 287.2010, 269.1888, 271.2061 | Kamebanin |
18 | 13.62 | C20H28O4 | 331.1912 | −0.8 | 313.1832, 285.1862, 269.1914, 149.0616 | 7α,10α,14β-10,14,18-Trihydroxykaura-11,16-dien-15-one |
19 | 13.62 | C20H26O6 | 361.1653 | −1.0 | 343.1541, 325.1422, 331.1544, 315.1603, 317.1728, 299.1639, 297.1480 | Macrocalyxin E |
20 | 13.63 | C20H26O5 | 345.1704 | −0.8 | 345.1710, 327.1596, 315.1630, 301.1820, 299.1666, 297.1499, 283.1700, 271.1702 | 1α,6β,7α-Trihydroxy-7α,20-epoxykaur-9(11),16-dien-15-one |
21 | 13.64 | C22H30O6 | 389.1967 | −0.5 | 347.1852, 345.2071, 329.1752, 327.1962, 311.1642, 301.1818, 285.1858 | 3β,7α,10α14β-7,14-Dihydroxy-12,15-dioxokaur-16-en-3-yl acetate |
22 | 14.87 | C20H32O4 | 333.2070 | −0.3 | 315.1961, 289.2197, 287.2017, 271.2048, 257.1901, 149.0601 | Excisanin C |
23 | 16.48 | C20H32O4 | 333.2066 | −1.5 | 315.1959, 297.1831 | Glaucocalyxin C |
24a | 19.89 | C20H28O6 | 363.1810 | −0.8 | 345.1714, 327.1609, 301.1809, 283.1704, 255.1770 | Rabdoternin A |
First of all, the mass defect deviation was confirmed based on the replacement of several components according to self-built database. The filter chromatogram was set as central formula ± mass defect tolerance range. A central formula was obtained using the average molecular formula of ent-kauranes diterpenoids, and the mass defect tolerance range was equal to the half-width of the mass defect range. The concept of the self-built filter was used first to define the filter reference based on the mother nucleus. According to all the structures of the reported compounds that we summarized, the substituents of ent-kaurane diterpenoids were primarily methyls, hydroxyls, formyls, methoxyls, acetyls, glucosyls and aldehydes. By calculating the mass defects of the multifarious substituents, including desaturation moieties and methyl groups generated the maximum increase in mass defects, except for hydroxyl groups, which led to a decrease. Hence, a maximum number of one glucosyl moiety and three hydroxyls were assigned to acquire a maximum value of mass defects corresponding to C26H42O10. Four hydroxyl groups and one carbonyl group were carefully assigned to acquire the minimum value, matching with C20H26O6.27 Hence, the calculated mass defect range was from 0.1704 to 0.2766 and the filter setting was set as (C23H34O8 ± 53.1 mDa) over the mass range of 300–500 Da. The parameter of the prediction of ent-kauranes diterpenoids were set as follows: the maximum tolerance of mass error was set at 5 ppm; H–C ratio was below 3; DBE (degree of unsaturation) was defined as 5–25; elemental composition ranged from 10 to 50 for carbon; from 10 to 30 for hydrogen; from 2 to 15 for oxygen. All the molecular formulas were assumed to have no nitrogen. As soon as the filtering template was employed in the total ion chromatogram (TIC), the representative fragment ions remained visible but the asymmetrical ions could be eliminated. In the TIC of the Isodon japonica samples, a low abundance of constituent ions were masked by background ions, resulting in mistaken identification of constituent ions of interest during manual detection. To reduce possible complex interference signal ions and characterize the typical ingredients globally and rapidly, the filtering technique was employed to obtain characteristic chromatographic peaks. In Fig. 2, it is obvious that the self-built filtering technique can significantly reduce the noise level. Next, the observed ions were calculated using the formula finder and communicated with ChemSpider v.1.1 (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA) to predict unknown chemical compounds.
Both negative and positive ionization modes were investigated to assess the mass spectrometric conditions. The negative mode was chosen because the ionization of ent-kaurane diterpenoids had higher sensitivity, more stable and repeatable ions, and lower background noise. So, the negative ionization mode was selected for the following experiments. Moreover, for optimization of (SMPI) conditions for quantitative analysis, the mass spectrometry cleavage patterns of investigated eight known reference standards were definitively detected in LC-Q-TOF-MS/MS.
According to the mass fragmentation behavior of glaucocalyxin A (14), the cleavage patterns of group 1 were summarized. The distinctive ions were observed by the consecutive loss of H2O and CO. For example, compounds 8 and 16 were eluted in the chromatogram at tR 8.91 min and 11.6 min, respectively, which are isomers with the same molecular formula, C20H32O4. Compounds 8 and 16 may have similar skeletons, as their MS/MS spectra are consistent with glaucocalyxin A (14). The MS/MS spectra of compound 8 and 16 showed three distinctive ions at m/z 317 ([M − H–H2O]−) and 299 ([M − H–H2O]−), which demonstrated that the hydroxyl group was easily lost. The other daughter ions at m/z 289 and 271 were produced by the loss of CO from the fragment ions at m/z 317 and 299. Based on the above MS/MS data, compounds 8 (Fig. 3B) and 16 were tentatively assigned as glaucocalyxin F and 1α, 6β, 7α-trihydroxy-7α, 20-epoxykaur-9 (11), 16-dien-15-one. Moreover, compounds 2, 5, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 were tentatively identified by comparison with the fragmentation patterns (Fig. S1†).
Lasiodonin (6) also belonged to group 2–1 and its deprotonated ion [M − H]− ion was m/z 363.1807. Lasiodonin and oridonin are a pair of isomers. They also possessed similar fragmentation pathways and a distinctive m/z 333.1696 fragment ion which indicated that a neutral fragment CH2O was lost from the deprotonated ion at m/z 363. Subsequent product ions were observed through successive losses of H2O from the deprotonated molecule ion m/z 363.1807, yielding the typical product ions at m/z 345.1690, 327.1589, 309.1482. Moreover, the [M − H–CH2O–2H2O]− (m/z 315.1680), [M − H–CO–3H2O]− (m/z 281.1532) and [M − H–CO–2H2O]− (m/z 299.1638) were also detected (Fig. 4B).
Hebeirubescensin K (1) demonstrated an precise mass of [M − H]− ion at m/z 365.1965 corresponding to the molecular formula C20H30O6. Enmenol (4) eluted in the chromatogram at retention time (tR) 5.58 min and gave a [M − H]− ion at m/z 365.1964, which showed that compounds 1 and 4 were a pair of isomers. The diagnostic ion at m/z 335 produced by the loss of a CH2O residue (30 Da) indicated the presence of the 7, 20-epoxy unit in the structure of compound 1 and compound 4. The MS/MS spectrum of compound 1 and compound 4 also contained abundant fragment ions such as [M − H–H2O]− (m/z 347), [M − H–2H2O]− (m/z 329), [M − H–CH2O–H2O]− (m/z 317), [M − H–CH2O–2H2O]− (m/z 299) and [M − H–CH2O–3H2O]− (m/z 281). The cleavage pathway of hebeirubescensin K (1) and enmenol (4) and the MS/MS spectra are shown in Fig. S2-A and S2-B,† respectively.
Rabdoternin A (24) also belonged to the 7, 20-epoxy-ent-kaurne-type diterpenoids. It produced fragment ions at m/z 345.1714 and 327.1609 via the continuous loss of H2O from the precursor ion (m/z 363.1810). Furthermore, the diagnostic product ions ([M − H–H2O–CO2]−) (m/z 301.1809) and [M − H–2H2O–CO2]− (m/z 283.1704) were yielded by the continuous cracking of the C-7–O bond and the C-20–C-10 bond to remove the neutral fragment CO2. The cleavage pathway of rabdoternin A (24) and the MS/MS spectrum of rabdoternin A are shown in Fig. S2-C.†
As above, other unknown 7, 20-epoxy-ent-kauranes, including 7, 15, and 20 were tentatively identified by comparison with the fragmentation patterns of standards (Fig. S3†).
Ponicidin (3) is a representative of group 2–2. Its MS/MS spectrum showed a remarkable deprotonated parent ion at m/z 361.1673 and subsequently lost a molecule of H2O at C-1 to form a dominant ion at m/z 343.1571. Furthermore, the characteristic fragment ion at m/z 299.1663 was observed and interpreted as the cracking of the C-7–O bond, the C-20–C-10 bond, and the C-14–O bond, accompanied by H-20 transferring to C-14 via the four-member transition state between H-20, C-20, O, and C-14 to eliminate the neutral fragment CO2. This cleavage was considered a major fragmentation pathway for C-20 diepoxy ent-kauranes. The typical product ions at m/z 271.1714 and m/z 253.1579 were detected in the MS/MS spectrum by the successive elimination of CO and H2O from the [M − H–H2O–CO2]− (m/z 299.1663) molecular ion. Moreover, other distinctive minor ions, such as [M − H–2H2O]−, [M − H–2H2O–CO]− and [M − H–2H2O–CO2]− at m/z 325.1456, m/z 297.1508 and m/z 281.1562, were also detected. The fragmentation pathway of ponicidin (3) and the MS/MS spectra are shown in Fig. 5.
Henryin (12) is a C-20 oxygenated nonepoxy diterpenoid (group 2–3); a dominant [M − H]− (m/z 391.2134) was detected in the MS/MS spectrum. The diagnostic product ion at m/z 331.1912 was observed by the loss of 60 Da, which demonstrated that a small molecular CH3COOH was lost from the deprotonated ion at m/z 391.2134. Characteristic fragment ions 287.1996 and 269.1908 were generated by the successive losses of CO2 and H2O. Furthermore, the typical fragment ions at m/z 373.2034 ([M − H2O–H]−), 313.1817 ([M − H–H2O–AcOH]−), 295.1721 ([M − H–2H2O–AcOH]−) and 267.1799 ([M − H–2H2O–AcOH–CO]−), which have a similar cleavage behavior to the C-20 non-oxygenated ent-kauranes diterpenoid, were also observed in high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data. The fragmentation pathway of henryin (12) and the MS/MS spectra are shown in Fig. 6.
compounds | Calibration curve | r2 | Liner range (μg mL−1) | LOQ (ng mL−1) | LOD (ng mL−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hebeirubescensin K | y = 2.61 × 105x + 9.41 × 105 | 0.9991 | 0.03467–3.4670 | 1.450 | 0.480 |
Enmenol | y = 2.58 × 106 − 3.92 × 103 | 0.9992 | 0.004233–0.4233 | 1.100 | 0.550 |
Henryin | y = 1.69 × 105 + 3.28 × 105 | 0.9985 | 0.22833–22.830 | 0.293 | 0.117 |
Lasiodonin | y = 4.02 × 105x − 28.9 | 0.9995 | 0.0048438–0.48438 | 0.832 | 0.555 |
Oridonin | y = 6.64 × 104x + 9.29 × 103 | 0.9999 | 0.3830–38.30 | 1.663 | 0.554 |
Glaucocalyxin A | y = 3.26 × 105x + 4.16 × 103 | 0.9993 | 0.68–68.00 | 1.435 | 0.287 |
Ponicidin | y = 1. 92 × 104x − 1.15 × 103 | 0.9983 | 0.06867–6.867 | 3.554 | 1.185 |
Rabdoternin A | y = 1.02 × 106x + 1.38 × 103 | 0.9987 | 0.08125–8.125 | 0.677 | 0.271 |
Analyte | Precision (%) | Repeatability (%) (n = 6) | Accuracy (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intra-day (n = 6) | Inter-day (n = 3) | Concentrations | Recovery (n = 3) | RSD (n = 3) | ||
Hebeirubescensin K | 3.5 | 3.0 | 1.8 | Low | 98.87 | 2.9 |
Middle | 98.12 | 2.8 | ||||
High | 99.35 | 3.1 | ||||
Enmenol | 2.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | Low | 99.43 | 3.5 |
Middle | 99.25 | 3.1 | ||||
High | 99.51 | 2.7 | ||||
Henryin | 1.1 | 1.7 | 3.4 | Low | 93.45 | 1.5 |
Middle | 94.26 | 2.4 | ||||
High | 93.57 | 2.6 | ||||
Lasiodonin | 2.5 | 2.3 | 4.8 | Low | 96.75 | 4.2 |
Middle | 95.83 | 3.1 | ||||
High | 94.62 | 2.7 | ||||
Oridonin | 1.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | Low | 102.52 | 5.6 |
Middle | 95.86 | 4.1 | ||||
High | 96.27 | 3.7 | ||||
Glaucocalyxin A | 1.6 | 3.3 | 1.3 | Low | 101.81 | 3.2 |
Middle | 98.54 | 2.9 | ||||
High | 98.24 | 2.7 | ||||
Ponicidin | 1.2 | 4.5 | 1.8 | Low | 99.25 | 2.9 |
Middle | 98.75 | 3.4 | ||||
High | 98.64 | 3.7 | ||||
Rabdoternin A | 2.4 | 4.9 | 3.9 | Low | 103.32 | 2.1 |
Middle | 101.04 | 2.6 | ||||
High | 97.54 | 2.4 |
Samples | Analystes (mg g−1, mean) | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hebeirubescensin K | Enmenol | Henryin | Lasiodonin | Oridonin | Glaucocalyxin A | Ponicidin | Rabdoternin A | ||
a N.D.: not detected. | |||||||||
S1 | 4.21 | 0.76 | 30.07 | N.D. | 76.30 | 1207.58 | 150.53 | 10.61 | 1480.07 |
S2 | 4.65 | 0.81 | 34.19 | N.D. | 77.39 | 1226.37 | 164.82 | 10.83 | 1519.06 |
S3 | 4.14 | 0.71 | 29.76 | N.D. | 69.29 | 1210.72 | 145.12 | 10.31 | 1470.05 |
S4 | 5.11 | 0.97 | 439.90 | N.D. | 12.01 | 1056.05 | 40.39 | 1.13 | 1555.57 |
S5 | 5.18 | 0.93 | 440.70 | N.D. | 13.82 | 1079.74 | 44.83 | 1.22 | 1586.43 |
S6 | 4.91 | 0.77 | 435.20 | N.D. | 10.27 | 952.91 | 39.42 | 1.05 | 1444.53 |
S7 | 1.64 | 0.33 | 12.95 | 0.41 | N.D. | 550.73 | 2.39 | N.D. | 568.46 |
S8 | 1.56 | 0.34 | 11.91 | 0.51 | N.D. | 593.70 | 2.95 | N.D. | 610.97 |
S9 | 1.44 | 0.29 | 9.07 | 0.37 | N.D. | 427.30 | 2.23 | N.D. | 440.71 |
S10 | 1.82 | 0.25 | 327.90 | 0.29 | N.D. | 796.056 | 2.29 | N.D. | 1128.61 |
S11 | 1.83 | 0.26 | 394.50 | 0.32 | N.D. | 857.89 | 3.02 | N.D. | 1257.82 |
S12 | 1.58 | 0.23 | 321.20 | 0.28 | N.D. | 762.05 | 1.88 | N.D. | 1087.22 |
S13 | 2.01 | 0.43 | 50.62 | N.D. | 16.86 | 1086.41 | 35.41 | 1.40 | 1193.15 |
S14 | 2.13 | 0.45 | 52.88 | N.D. | 17.89 | 1104.59 | 37.73 | 1.45 | 1217.11 |
S15 | 1.91 | 0.42 | 47.97 | N.D. | 16.61 | 1084.80 | 34.92 | 1.39 | 1188.02 |
S16 | 2.74 | 0.47 | 172.10 | N.D. | 3.71 | 934.80 | 18.96 | 0.66 | 1133.44 |
S17 | 2.47 | 0.49 | 186.10 | N.D. | 3.66 | 1019.16 | 23.28 | 0.76 | 1235.91 |
S18 | 1.64 | 0.45 | 155.90 | N.D. | 1.89 | 924.99 | 17.99 | 0.64 | 1103.50 |
S19 | 1.73 | 0.32 | 184.10 | 0.31 | N.D. | 854.21 | 2.33 | N.D. | 1042.99 |
S20 | 1.70 | 0.31 | 188.20 | 0.31 | N.D. | 839.94 | 2.77 | N.D. | 1033.23 |
S21 | 1.83 | 0.30 | 155.70 | 0.27 | N.D. | 799.23 | 1.95 | N.D. | 959.28 |
S22 | 1.64 | 0.25 | 120.60 | 0.12 | N.D. | 460.08 | 1.80 | N.D. | 584.49 |
S23 | 1.33 | 0.23 | 178.10 | 0.14 | N.D. | 716.26 | 1.89 | N.D. | 897.97 |
S24 | 1.35 | 0.26 | 179.90 | 0.11 | N.D. | 738.20 | 2.27 | N.D. | 922.09 |
S25 | 1.23 | 0.22 | 171.30 | 0.08 | N.D. | 593.72 | 1.83 | N.D. | 768.39 |
S26 | N.D. | N.D. | 110.75 | N.D. | N.D. | 817.24 | N.D. | N.D. | 927.99 |
S27 | N.D. | N.D. | 11.65 | N.D. | N.D. | 856.27 | N.D. | N.D. | 867.92 |
S28 | N.D. | 0.04 | 204.39 | 0.13 | N.D. | 631.68 | 6.86 | N.D. | 843.095 |
S29 | N.D. | 0.34 | 32.46 | 0.01 | N.D. | 745.26 | 12.42 | N.D. | 790.49 |
S30 | N.D. | 0.04 | 191.81 | N.D. | N.D. | 871.30 | 4.37 | 0.13 | 1067.65 |
S31 | N.D. | 0.39 | 85.76 | N.D. | N.D. | 776.50 | 3.27 | 0.07 | 865.99 |
Fig. 7 SMPI chromatograms of Isodon japonica. Samples (A), reference substances (B) and (C) SMPI transitions of 8 standards. |
All quantitative data were analyzed using PCA. The contents of eight diterpenoids were set as variables, and different batches of samples were set as observations. The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2), with more than 80.83% of the total variance, were extracted for analysis. PC1 accounted for 61.38% of the variance and PC2 accounted for 19.45% of the variance. As shown in Table S1,† PC1 included strong contributions from ponicidin, oridonin and rabdoternin A (3, 13 and 24); PC2 was directly correlated with henryin (12). A two-component PCA score scatter plot (Fig. 8) exhibited that samples were clearly divided into two clusters: one for samples originating from north China, including samples S1–S6 and S13–S18 in domain A; and the other for samples originating from central China and northeast China, including samples S7–S12 and S19–S31 in domain B, which indicated that PC1 (ponicidin, oridonin and rabdoternin A) was important for discrimination. Therefore, the total amount of tested diterpenoids was distinctively different between various areas; samples from Hebei and Shanxi belong to north China, Hubei belongs to central China and Jilin and Liaoning Provinces to northeast China. The content of total diterpenoids in samples from north China was higher than for herbs in central China and northeast China. The results indicate that place of origin has an impact on product quality, which suggests that the quality of this herb could be assured if locality is standardized. Therefore, we developed a generally effective and applicable approach to analyze ent-kaurane diterpenoids in Isodon japonica samples based on the self-built method. More importantly, this strategy could be extensively used to identify the bioactive structural analogues from other herbal preparations.
Fig. 8 Scatter plot obtained by PCA of 31 batches of samples on the first two principal components: (A) north China; (B) central China and northeast China. |
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8ra08732f |
‡ The authors contributed equally to this work. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019 |