Direct on-surface synthesis of gold–phthalocyanine via cyclization of cyano-groups with gold adatoms

Zhongping Wang a, Xiaoqing Liu a, Yan Lu a, Zegao Wang bc, Christian Bortolini b, Menglin Chen b, Sheng Wei a, Wei Li a, Junfa Zhu d, Huanxin Ju d, Federico Rosei e, Mingdong Dong *b and Li Wang *a
aDepartment of Physics, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China. E-mail: liwang@ncu.edu.cn
bInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research (SDC), Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark. E-mail: dong@inano.au.dk
cCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
dNational Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230029, China
eCentre for Energy, Materials and Telecommunications of INRS, Varennes, Quebec J3X 1S2, Canada

Received 31st January 2019 , Accepted 9th April 2019

First published on 11th April 2019


Abstract

We report the synthesis of gold–phthalocyanines on an Au(111) surface via cyclization of dibenzo[fg,op]tetracene-5,6,12,13-tetracarbonitrile molecules. Scanning tunnelling microscopic images unambiguously reveal that gold adatoms act as linkers via metal coordination bonding to form metastable supra-molecular structures, and simultaneously replace metal ions within the final products, metal phthalocyanines.


On-surface single molecule synthesis presents exciting opportunities1–4 for producing new functional aromatic architectures, e.g. molecular wires,5 two-dimensional porous organic networks,6,7 graphene nanoribbons,8,9 aromatic polymers and 2D conjugated polymers.10–13 Such surface confined polymers14–16 have been synthesized using various chemical reactions including Ullmann coupling,17–19 Glaser's coupling,20 Bergman's cyclization,21 cyclo-dehydrogenation22 and cyclo-addition,23 where highly active metal atoms play important roles in on-surface synthesis reactions. In addition to surface defects,24 foreign atoms25 or clusters26 deposited on solid surfaces, intrinsic adatoms originating from the substrate may effectively activate or catalyze these reactions, particularly on Cu, Pd and Pt surfaces.27 Gold is considered as one of the “elements” for classic Ullmann coupling, similar to Cu and Ag. It is predicted that the chemically inert Au potentially has enhanced catalytic properties and coordination ability for Ullmann coupling when its size is in the range from one to a few dozens of atoms. Recently, it has been reported that metal–organic coordinated networks can be formed by the interaction of Au adatoms with organic molecules such as porphyrin or phthalocyanine derivatives,28 organo-phosphorus compounds,29 cyano-groups(–C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N)30 and molecules containing highly electronegative substituents such as sulphur or chlorine.31 Nevertheless, the role of Au adatoms in chemical reactions, especially as a catalyst for synthesizing novel compounds, is still poorly understood.

Here we present the synthesis of gold–phthalocyanines (Au–Pc) on an Au(111) surface via cyclization of dibenzo[fg,op]tetracene-5,6,12,13-tetracarbonirile (DTTCN) molecules with gold adatoms. Scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) images reveal that Au adatoms act as linkers via metal coordination bonding to form metastable supra-molecular structures, and simultaneously replace the metal ions within the final products (i.e. the metal Pc). Our findings shed light on noble metal-based surface synthesis and considerably enrich our understanding of the role of noble metal adatoms in the reaction mechanism.

Fig. 1 displays STM images of the DTTCN molecules on the Au(111) surface after annealing at various temperatures. Upon annealing at 330 K, DTTCN self-assembles into well-ordered structures where a single DTTCN molecule exhibits a central protrusion with two lateral lobes, as shown in Fig. 1a. By comparing the experimental image and the molecular model of the DTTCN molecule, the central oval protrusion is attributed to an acene-like backbone and two V-shapes with a 60° angle on the left and the right sides correspond to two adjacent terminal cyano-groups (–C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N), respectively. After annealing at 450 K for 5 minutes, the self-assembled structure in Fig. 1a vanishes and is replaced with a new supramolecular structure with a two-fold symmetrical hollow cross-like structure, as shown in Fig. 1b. Each cross-like structure (inset of Fig. 1b) consists of four DTTCN molecules in which the –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N within one side of every DTTCN molecule forms the cyclic ring. This kind of cross-like structure can be rotated and displaced on the surface as a whole during STM manipulations, as shown in Fig. S1 (ESI). The stability of this cross-like structure upon STM manipulation confirms that the DTTCN molecules within the new molecular structure are strongly bonded to each other, indicating that a new compound might be synthesized by combining four DTTCN molecules via cyclization of the –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N on the Au surface.


image file: c9qm00070d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 STM images of DTTCN molecules adsorbed on an Au(111) surface that experience a hierarchical on-surface reaction driven by thermal treatments. (a) The assembly structure; the inset presents the structural model and high-resolution STM (HR-STM) image for a single DTTCN molecule (Vs = −2.8 V and Is = −0.04 nA). (b) The cross-like supramolecular network (Vs = −1.80 V and Is = −0.03 nA). (c) The mesh-like network (Vs = −1.10 V and Is = −0.03 nA).

Abel et al.32,33 reported a similar synthesis of metal–Pc, where Fe or Mn were introduced as guest metal atoms to the cyclization reaction of the –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N. In our study, however, no guest atoms are introduced during annealing, meaning that the reaction occurred as a result of thermal-induced self-assembly and molecular rearrangement. After annealing at 620 K for 5 min, the DTTCN molecules which are not involved in the reaction at 450 K to form cross-like structures are activated to take part in the cyclization reactions of cyano-groups; thus, the cross-like structures increase their degree of order by linking each other and aligning along two perpendicular directions, as shown in Fig. 1c.

Based on our experimental observations, the on-surface reaction process of DTTCN molecules driven by thermal treatment can be described as a hierarchical process: (i) every two –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]Ns in four DTTCN molecules are activated to take part in the cyclization reaction that leads to the formation of cross-like structures; (ii) the latter act as a precursor to create a mesh-like polymer via the cyclization reaction of the residual cyano-groups within the cross-like molecules.

Fig. 2a identifies a hole at the centre of the cross-like structure surrounded by eight symmetrical spherical protrusions. This feature resembles metal–Pc such as Cu–Pc on HOPG34 and Au(111),35 Zn–Pc on Cu(100).36 Abel et al.32,33 synthesized Pc-like compounds by using the cyanide of tetracyanobenzene molecules as a precursor and introducing Mn or Fe atoms for the metal-induced cyclization reaction. The cross-like structure obtained in this work is very similar to Abel's Cu–Pc35 and Fe–Pc,32 strongly suggesting that the cross-like compound has a similar chemical structure compared to metal–Pc. Fig. 2b reports the structural model for the Pc-type compound synthesized with Au as the catalyst by four DTTCN molecules via the cyclization reaction between –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N of DTTCN. Fig. 2c shows the height profiles of the cross-like structure along its perpendicular axes (labelled as AB and CD). The separation between two adjacent protrusions that correspond to the benzene rings located on the side of the DTTCN molecules is measured to be 18 Å, which matches the expected value from the structural model in Fig. 2b. Good agreement between the simulated STM image in Fig. 2d and our experimental results is a strong indication that the cross-like compound possesses a metal–Pc-like chemical structure.


image file: c9qm00070d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 STM images and models of the cross-like structure at the sub-molecular level. (a) HR-STM image (Vs = −0.90 V and Is = −0.08 nA). (b) Molecular model. (c) Height profiles along the lines indicated in Fig. 2a. (d) Simulated STM image. (e) STM image recorded by functionalizing the STM tip via empirical adsorption of an Au adatom (Vs = −0.83 V and Is = −0.10 nA). (f) Detailed STM image for a single Au–Pc compound.

Since none guest metal atoms are introduced onto the surface in our study, it is reasonable to conclude that the coordinated metal atoms in our metal–Pc-like products are actually the Au adatoms, which are incorporated into the Pc rings during the on-site reaction processes. For most metal–Pc molecules (e.g. Fe–Pc32 and Cu–Pc34), their coordinated metal atoms are not visible in both the experimental and simulated STM images although the coordinated Co atom appears as a bright dot in CoPc metal.37 In convex metal–Pc (e.g. Pb–Pc), the Pb atom appears as a bright dot.38 To test whether the coordinated Au atom is present or not in such compound, the STM image has been obtained at the single molecule level by functionalizing the STM tip via empirical adsorption of a Au adatom from the Au(111) surface, as shown in Fig. 2e. The visibility of the coordinated Au atom in the centre of the cross-like structure provides further insights into our compound being a Au–Pc-like structure, as shown in Fig. 2f. With the assistance of Au adatoms, the –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N of the DTTCN molecules participates in the on-surface cyclization reaction to synthesize Au–PC-like molecules, while the DTTCN core (that possesses thermal-stability) allows the main skeleton of the DTTCN molecule to be retained, even upon annealing at 620 K. The surface cyclization of −C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N with Au adatoms is also confirmed by core-level measurements of the different elements (C and N), as shown in Fig. S2 (ESI). This Au–PC-like molecule can be named with Au–(dibenzo[fg,op]tetrancene) porphyrazine which is abbreviated as Au–DTT–porphyrazine. Due to the similar molecular configuration,39 we propose that the form of gold in the Au–DTT–porphyrazine is 3+. The experiment results show only Au–DTT–porphyrazine oligomer packing monolayer rather than a covalent Au–DTT–porphyrazine network. In this case one side phthalonitrile of one DTTCN is activated to form an Au–DTT–porphyrazine oligomer but at the same time the other side phthalonitrile will be passivated.

Fig. 3 shows the step-by-step reaction from DTTCN molecules to Au–DTT–porphyrazine formation during thermal treatments ranging from 360 K to 450 K. As shown in Fig. 3a, even if the reconstruction of the Au(111) surface is present, annealing at 360 K drives the DTTCN molecules to self-assemble into windmill-like structures. Four DTTCN molecules gathering around a dot, assumed as a windmill-like configuration with either a right-hand (green circle) or a left-hand (purple circle) structure, form long-range ordered 2D domains by sharing a single DTTCN molecule among adjacent windmill-like structures, as shown in Fig. 3b. The circular dots located at the centre of the windmill-like structures are considered as trapped Au adatoms originated from the Au(111) surface rather than being extracted from the crystals. This conclusion is drawn on the basis that no guest atoms were introduced to the Au(111) surface before or after the adsorption of the DTTCN molecules, and we did not observe increase of the lattice imperfections on the surface. These windmill-like structures are composed of N atoms of –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N coordinated to the Au adatom and the two adjacent –C[triple bond, length as m-dash]N with an angle of 60° in a molecular chemical structure, leading to the formation of ordered left/right-handed metal coordinated structures. A simulated STM image for the metal–organic coordinated windmill-like structure with left-hand is shown in Fig. 3c. The features observed in this image are similar to those found in the experimental STM topography. This mixed structure gradually converts to the left-handed or right-handed metal coordinate structure as a result of an increase of annealing treatment temperature to 380 K. An ordered windmill-like arrangement with left-handed structures is shown in Fig. 3d, with a close-up view presented in Fig. 3e. Two white arrows highlight the square unit cell containing two molecules and one Au atom; the vectors were measured to be a1 = a2 = 2.0 nm with an angle of 90°. As shown, if the annealing temperature is further increased to 420 K (for 5 minutes), two types of co-existing building blocks are obtained. It is therefore possible to observe the transition between the well-ordered arrangement (Fig. 3d) and the new self-assembly structure highlighted (with a blue rectangle) in Fig. 3f. Fig. 3g shows the STM image corresponding to the blue rectangle in Fig. 3f. If these structures are imaged by using a normal tip (Fig. 3h), the coordinated Au atoms in the windmill-like structures are not visible. Therefore, new Au–DTT–porphyrazine molecules are obtained from a reaction between DTTCN molecules and Au ad-atoms provided by the Au(111) surface. Further increasing the annealing treatment to 450 K, as shown in Fig. 3i, the formation of a homogeneous pattern of coordinated Au–DTT–porphyrazine structures on the Au(111) surface is observed. In addition, the brighter dots labelled by blue circles in Fig. 3j indicate that the gold adatoms assist the DTTCN molecules’ reaction to form Au–DTT–porphyrazine and simultaneously promote the coordination of the Au–DTT–porphyrazine products to form a metal–organic morphology with a periodic arrangement. To further understand the role of the gold adatom in the reaction, the tert-butyl groups are chosen to substitute the H atoms in positions 2 and 9 in the DTTCN molecule to form 2,9-diter-butyldibenzo[fg,op]tetracene-5,6,12,13-tetracarbonirile molecules (BTTN). Fig. S3 (ESI) unambiguously confirms that the cyano-groups within the BTTN are not able to coordinate with the gold adatoms, because these functional groups are not in the same plane of the gold adatoms. These observations confirm that the gold ad-atom plays an important role in surface cyclization reactions to form noble metal Pc.


image file: c9qm00070d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Observation of a cross-like structure on-surface synthesis step-by-step. (a) Windmill-like configuration upon annealing at 360 K (Vs = −0.65 V and Is = −0.04 nA). (b) Zoomed-in image and (c) simulated image of the windmill-like configuration with a left-hand structure. (d) Large-area and (e) HR-STM image of the left-handed structures by annealing at 380 K (Vs = −1.16 V and Is = −0.05 nA). (f) The coexistence of the windmill-like arrangement and the Au–Pc compound after annealing at 420 K (Vs = −0.88 V and Is = −0.05 nA). (g) HR-STM image for the area marked by a square in (f). (h) STM image of the same area in (g) acquired with an unfunctionalized tip (Vs = −1.30 V and Is = −0.03 nA). (i) Assembled structure and (j) HR-STM image of Au–DTT–porphyrazine upon annealing at 450 K (Vs = −0.85 V and Is = −0.1 nA). Au adatoms are labelled with a blue circle. (STM images in (a), (b), (d)–(g), (i), and (j) acquired by functionalizing the STM tip via empirical adsorption of an Au ad-atom on the Au(111) surface).

Conclusions

In summary, we report the confined synthesis of gold–Pc molecules on an Au(111) substrate via a reaction between DTTCN molecules and gold adatoms. STM observations directly reveal that the gold ad-atoms act as linkers via metal coordination bonding to form metastable supra-molecular structures, and simultaneously replace metal ions within the final products, metal–Pc. This finding sheds new light on understanding the role of noble metal ad-atoms in on-surface reactions. In addition, the hierarchical synthesis of a π-conjugated system embedding gold ad-atoms is a key step forward towards chemical synthesis using 2D confinement of precursor molecules on metal surfaces, and the bottom-up growth of functional architectures for future electronic and optoelectronic devices.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61474059, 11727902 and 61864007) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20181BAB201012). L. W. acknowledges Jiangxi Provincial Innovation Talents of Science and Technology (20165BCB18003). M. D. acknowledges grants from the Danish National Research Foundation, Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond (AUFF NOVA-project), Karen Elise Jensens Fond, Villum Foundation, Lundbeck Foundation, and EU H2020 RISE 2016 (MNR4SCell 734174 project). F. R. is grateful to the Canada Research Chairs program for partial salary support. Z. W. acknowledges grants from Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (YJ201893).

Notes and references

  1. C. Santato and F. Rosei, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 344 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. M. Ebrahimi and F. Rosei, Nature, 2017, 542, 423 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. M. El Garah, J. M. MacLeod and F. Rosei, Surf. Sci., 2013, 613, 6 CrossRef CAS.
  4. X. Wang, J. K. Weber, L. Liu, M. Dong, R. Zhou and J. Li, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 15341 RSC.
  5. Z. Wang, H. H. Wu, Q. Li, F. Besenbacher, X. C. Zeng and M. Dong, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 18178 RSC.
  6. J. Eichhorn, D. Nieckarz, O. Ochs, D. Samanta, M. Schmittel, P. J. Szabelski and M. Lackinger, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 7880 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. Y. Li, L. Liu, R. Subramani, Y. Pan, B. Liu, Y. Yang, C. Wang, W. Mamdouh, F. Besenbacher and M. Dong, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9155 RSC.
  8. P. Han, K. Akagi, C. F. Federici, R. Shimizu, H. Oguchi, S. Shiraki, P. S. Wsiss, N. Asao and T. Hitosugi, ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 12035 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. Z. Wang, H. Zhao, Y. Lu, F. Xiang, X. Leng, X. Liu, X. Song, M. Dong and L. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 8420 RSC.
  10. Z. Wang, Q. Li, H. Xu, C. Dahl-Petersen, Q. Yang, D. Cheng, D. Cao, F. Besenbacher, J. V. Lauritsen, S. Helveg and M. Dong, Nano Energy, 2018, 49, 634 CrossRef CAS.
  11. L. Lafferentz, V. Eberhardt, C. Dri, C. Africh, G. Comelli, F. Esch, S. Hecht and L. Grill, Nat. Chem., 2012, 4, 215 CrossRef CAS.
  12. D. Peyrot and F. Silly, ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 5490 CrossRef CAS.
  13. Z. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Chen, B. Cui, Y. Li, F. Besenbacher and M. Dong, NPG Asia Mater., 2018, 10, 703 CrossRef CAS.
  14. G. Franc and A. Gourdon, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 14283 RSC.
  15. Q. Fan, C. Wang, L. Liu, Y. Han, J. Zhao, J. Zhu, J. Kuttner, G. Hilt and J. M. Gottfried, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 13018 CrossRef CAS.
  16. M. Bieri, M. T. Nguyen, O. Gröning, J. Cai, M. Treier, K. Aït-Mansour, P. Ruffieux, C. A. Pignedoli, D. Passerone and M. Kastler, et al. , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 16669 CrossRef CAS.
  17. M. Di Giovannantonio, M. Tomellini, J. Lipton-Duffin, G. Galeotti, M. Ebrahimi, A. Cossaro, A. Verdini, N. Kharche, V. Meunier and G. Vaseur, et al. , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 16696 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. E. A. Lewis, C. J. Murphy, M. L. Liriano and E. C. H. Sykes, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1006 RSC.
  19. J. Eichhorn, T. Strunskus, A. Rastgoo-Lahrood, D. Samanta, M. Schmittel and M. Lackinger, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 7680 RSC.
  20. Y. Q. Zhang, N. Kepčija, M. Kleinschrodt, K. Diller and S. Fischer, Nat. Commun., 2012, 3, 1286 CrossRef.
  21. Q. Sun, C. Zhang, Z. Li, H. Kong, Q. Tan, A. Hu and W. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 8448 CrossRef CAS.
  22. G. Otero, G. Biddau, C. Sánchez-Sánchez, R. Caillard, M. F. López, C. Rogero, F. J. Palomares, N. Cabello, M. A. Basanta and J. Ortega, et al. , Nature, 2008, 454, 865 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. O. Diaz Arado, H. Mönig, H. Wagner, J. H. Franke, G. Langewisch, P. A. Held, A. Studer and H. Fuchs, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 8509 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. M. Kong, Y. Li, X. Chen, T. Tian, P. Fang, F. Zheng and X. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 16414 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. W. Thijssen, D. Marjenburgh, R. Bremmer and J. M. Van Ruitenbeek, J. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 96, 026806 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. D. Y. Murzin, J. Catal., 2010, 276, 85 CrossRef CAS.
  27. S. T. Marshall and J. W. Medlin, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2011, 66, 173 CrossRef CAS.
  28. J. Mielke, F. Hanke, M. V. Peters, S. Hecht, M. Persson and L. Grill, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 1844 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. A. D. Jewell, E. C. H. Sykes and G. Kyriakou, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 3545 CrossRef CAS.
  30. M. N. Faraggi, N. Jiang, N. Gonzalez-Lakunza, A. Langner, S. Stepanow, K. Kern and A. Arnau, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 24558 CrossRef CAS.
  31. W. Xu, M. Dong, H. Gersen, E. Rauls, S. Vazquez-Campos, M. Crego-Calama, D. N. Reinhoudt, E. Laegsgaard, I. Stensgaard and T. R. Linderoth, Small, 2008, 4, 1620 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. S. Kezilebieke, A. Amokrane, M. Abel and J. P. Bucher, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2014, 5, 3175 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. M. Koudia and M. Abel, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 8565 RSC.
  34. Y. L. Huang, H. Li, J. Ma, H. Huang, W. Chen and A. T. Wee, Langmuir, 2009, 26, 3329 CrossRef PubMed.
  35. E. Nardi, L. Chen, S. Clair, M. Koudia, L. Giovanelli, X. Feng, K. Müllen and M. Abel, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 27549 CrossRef CAS.
  36. F. Chen, X. Chen, L. Liu, X. Song, S. Liu, J. Liu, H. Ouyang, Y. Cai, X. Liu and H. Pan, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2012, 100, 081602 CrossRef.
  37. D. E. Barlow, L. Scudiero and K. W. Hipps, Langmuir, 2004, 20, 4413 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. A. Sperl, J. Kroger and R. Berndt, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2011, 115, 6973 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. S. Mullegger, W. Schofberger, M. Rashidi, T. Lengauer, F. Klappenberger, K. Diller, K. Kara, J. V. Barth, E. Rauls, W. G. Schmidt and R. Koch, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 6480 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experiment and method, author contributions, the rotated and moved STM images, XPS of C and N of HTTN, and STM images of BTTN. See DOI: 10.1039/c9qm00070d

This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2019