Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Sunlight active U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite superfast photocatalyst: synthesis, characterization and application

K. Raagulan ab, M. M. M. G. P. G. Mantilaka *ac, G. T. D. Chandrakumara c, U. G. Mihiri Ekanayake ac, W. P. S. L. Wijesinghe ac, Shanmuganathan Ehanathan a, R. M. G. Rajapakse ad, Ramanaskanda Braveenth b and Kyu Yun Chai *b
aPostgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka. E-mail:;; Tel: +94114650556
bDivision of Bio Nano Chemistry, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, South Korea. E-mail:; Tel: +82638506230
cSri Lanka Institute of Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology and Science Park, Mahenwatte, Pitipana, Homagama, Sri Lanka
dDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka

Received 19th June 2018 , Accepted 7th October 2018

First published on 8th October 2018


Sunlight active U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite photocatalyst has been synthesized for the first time using co-precipitation method. The synthesized composite has a particle size ranging from 18 nm to 30 nm with band gap energy of 2.9 eV. The composite photocatalyst is capable of degrading methylene blue completely within 30 min under sunlight irradiation. Therefore, this superfast efficient sunlight-active photocatalyst is very useful in industrial organic waste water treatment.

Large number of industries including textile, petroleum, cosmetics, paper, leather, pharmaceutical, rubber, plastic, pesticides and food consume enormous quantities of organic chemicals as raw materials and consequently excessive amounts of these chemicals are released into water bodies as waste effluents.1 Hence, various techniques have been developed for water purification with various chemical, physical and biological methods including coagulation, flocculation, filtration, precipitation, ion exchange, membrane-filtration, adsorption techniques, biodegradation methods and catalytic routes like photocatalysis.2 Among these techniques, photocatalysis plays a vital role because it breaks organic pollutants into simplest gaseous forms without generating secondary pollutants.

Many types of semiconductors have been studied as photocatalysts such as TiO2, ZnO, CdS, WO3, and so on.1,3 Most photocatalysts are UV active; UV lights are required for efficient degradation of organic pollutants in effluents. Therefore, photocatalysts active under both UV and visible light are attractive, efficient and cost effective for industrial effluent treatment plants compared to those active only under UV as UV-vis active catalysts are useful to degrade organic pollutants under direct sunlight. In order to fulfill this requirement, band gap of photocatalyst has to be narrowed or split into several sub-band gaps, which can be achieved through non-metal/metal doping, coupling semiconductors or dye sensitization. In core–shell semiconductor nanocomposites, nanocrystals are composed of a quantum dot semiconducting core material and a shell of a distinct semiconducting material in which electrons are injected from core to the shell generating the photocurrent, which depends on exciton dissociation at the core–shell interface and relative alignment of conduction and valence-band edges of the core and shell. Furthermore, both electrons and holes are in the core region and electrons and holes are spatially separated into core and shell regions.4–6

In this research, U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite spheres with particle size 18–30 nm were formulated and synthesized for the first time by co-precipitation method as a sunlight active superfast photocatalyst. The synthesized catalyst is capable of full degradation of standard model dye, methylene blue (MB), under 30 min of sunlight irradiation. The catalyst has a bandgap energy of 2.9 eV and is active under visible light. Therefore, the synthesized material is useful in organic dye degradation under direct sunlight, which is very useful for industrial effluent treatment plants.

In the synthesis procedure of the composite photocatalyst, 100 ml of 0.1 M uranyl nitrate solution and 100 ml of 0.1 M ZnSO4 solution were mixed together and stirred for 2 min. 0.2 ml of 25% CTAB was added into the mixture while stirring, until the temperature reached 80 °C. 10% (w/w) ammonia solution [NH4OH(aq)] was added drop-wise while the supernatant was being tested with 0.1 M sodium phosphate solution [Na3PO4(aq)]. Constant temperature of 80 °C was maintained while stirring for 1 h with occasional ultra-sonication. Equal volume of distilled water was added to the above solution in order to dilute the concentration by 0.5 and kept under similar conditions for 15 min. The mixture was sonicated for 20 min. Then, it was filtered and thoroughly washed with 50 ml aliquots of distilled water three times. A yellow color product was obtained and it was air-dried overnight. The product was autoclaved at 120 °C for 2 h and filtered using suction filtration. Final product was calcined at 800 °C for 2 h to obtain the U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite.

The crystalline phases of U3O8@ZnO was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Siemens D5000 Powder X-ray Diffractometer (Cu Kα λ = 0.1540562 nm and scanning rate of 1° min−1). XRD patterns were analyzed with the aid of the ICDD PDF 2 database. The average sizes of crystallites were estimated using the Debye–Scherrer formula, which was applied to high intensity XRD peaks.7 Hitachi SU6600 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used to examine morphology and average size of particles with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy was used to observe the elemental distribution of the composite with a scanning rate of 192[thin space (1/6-em)]000 CPS for 4 min. The Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra was recorded on a Shimadzu IR Prestige 21 instrument with the KBr pellet method. Herein, the ratio of sample to KBr was maintained at 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]40 and the pellets were prepared by applying 5 tons of pressure. UV-visible spectroscopy (UV-1800 Shimadzu) was used to obtain UV-vis spectrum of the composite and methylene blue solutions. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) studies were conducted to evaluate the degraded products of methylene blue using Waters Alliance 2695 instrument with Waters 2998 PDA detector.

Methylene blue was used as a standard model dye to evaluate photocatalytic performance of the composite. 0.001 g of U3O8@ZnO powder was dispersed in 250 ml of 5 ppm MB solution in a dark place. The suspended solution was stirred for 30 min and kept for 10 h in the same conditions to allow the system to come to the adsorption equilibrium in order to avoid experimental errors due to adsorption of MB on to the catalyst. The resultant equilibrated solution was then exposed to sunlight for 1 h with occasional shaking during which period 5 ml of sample was siphoned off in 5 min time intervals. The obtained 5 ml exposed samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min to separate MB solution from dispersed catalyst and analyzed under UV-visible spectroscopy. The efficiency of dye degradation was calculated using eqn (1) below.

image file: c8na00051d-t1.tif(1)
where qe is the efficiency of dye degradation, C0 is the initial concentration and C is the concentration of MB after irradiation by sunlight.

The FTIR spectrum (Fig. 1a) of the synthesized product before calcination exhibits bands at 825 cm−1 and 943 cm−1 ascribed to UO22+ group; these are characteristic bands of UO22+ complexes. The C–O bonds found in FTIR bands at 1435 cm−1 and 1234 cm−1 confirm the possibility of U(VI) carbonate complex formation.8 The most typical bond recognized in FTIR is Zn–O at the finger print region at 410 cm−1 (400–500 cm−1).1 So, zinc is available in the sample, which is further confirmed by elemental analysis, which is described later. The broad band between 3000 and 3500 cm−1 indicates the stretching mode of OH and 1600 cm−1 imply the bending mode. Further, bands at 3200 and 1651 cm−1 indicate the stretching vibrations of alkane from CTAB. Shoulder of the N–H stretching absorptions between 3400 and 3500 cm−1 indicates the primary amine, which is the terminal group of CTAB.9 FTIR results reveal that the synthesized nanocomposite consists both Zn and U. Solubility product of UO2(OH)2 is in the order of 10−23, while solubility product of Zn(OH)2 is in the order of 10−17.10,11 According to the solubility, UO2(OH)2 could form core, whereas Zn(OH)2 acts as shell. Hence, the un-calcined product is UO2(OH)2@Zn(OH)2 with CTAB.

image file: c8na00051d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) FT-IR spectrum of UO2(OH)2/Zn(OH)2. CTAB (b) XRD pattern of the synthesized U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite.

XRD pattern (Fig. 1b) confirms that the synthesized material is crystalline and it is in good agreement with FTIR results. The peak positions at 2θ values of 21.65°, 27.23°, 34.98°, 43.99°, 52.413° and 60.61° can be assigned to those of orthorhombic polycrystalline U3O8.12 The typical high intensity peak of U3O8 occurs at 27.23°, which implies that the U3O8 precursor has been annealed properly at 800 °C. Some of the ZnO peak positions are adjacent to those of U3O8, which are found to be at 2θ values of 47.54°, 56.60°, 63°, 66.37° and 69.14° and occurrence of these peaks implies formation of polycrystalline ZnO with wurtzite structure.13 According to the Scherrer equation, the average crystallite size of U3O8@ZnO is approximately 27 nm.8

EDX results, as shown in Fig. 2, confirm the presence of Zn, U and O in the composite with atomic percentages of 20.01%, 19.63% and 60.37%, respectively. Thus, Zn to U atomic ratio of the composite is 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1. In addition, the atomic percentage of ZnO is about 40% and remaining part is U3O8. Hence, ratio between Zn and O is 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, whereas U[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]O ratio is about 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2.1. Further, Chave et al. reported that at 800 °C UO2(OH)2 converts into U3O8. Hence, formula of the composite is U3O8@ZnO.14,15 EDX results confirm that the U3O8@ZnO has been formed as required and the ZnO amount is greater than that of U3O8. The SEM images (Fig. 3) depict that the morphology of U3O8·ZnO is spherical with particles in nanometer scale. However, these spheres have been aggregated to form various irregular formations. According to SEM study, the particle diameter is in the range 18–30 nm and aggregate particles are in micrometer range (Fig. 4).

image file: c8na00051d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 EDX (a) mapping and (b) spectrum of U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite.

image file: c8na00051d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 SEM images of U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite.

image file: c8na00051d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Solid state UV-vis based Tauc plot of U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite.

Fig. 5 shows the UV-vis spectra of MB under different time periods of sunlight irradiation, which was degraded by the nanocomposite. The maximum visible light absorption of MB dye is found to be at 663 nm. Peak drastically reduced with the addition of the composite catalyst under sunlight. The photocatalytic degradation efficiency (qe) of MB dye containing composite catalyst under sunlight irradiation at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min are 93.04, 97.88, 96.5, 99.17 and 100% respectively. MB was fully degraded within 30 min of sunlight irradiation, which can be confirmed by the disappearance of UV-vis spectrum at this point. UV-vis study on the mixture of U3O8@ZnO catalyst and methylene blue solution kept under dark conditions confirms that the U3O8@ZnO is a photocatalyst, not an adsorbent as shown in supplementary data Fig. S3.Fig. 6a shows the first order kinetic plot of ln(C0/C) versus the irradiation time, which shows that the reaction follows first order kinetics. The rate constant (k) and the half-life (t1/2) values of degradation reaction are 0.1038 min−1 and 6.68 min respectively. Fig. 6b shows photographs of dye solution with catalyst before and after irradiation by sunlight, which is visibly evident with the production of clean water with the catalyst and sunlight.

image file: c8na00051d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 UV-vis spectra of MB under different time periods of sunlight exposure with U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite catalyst.

image file: c8na00051d-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (a) Degradation kinetics and (b) before and after degradation of MB by the synthesized U3O8@ZnO catalyst.

HPLC results, as shown in Fig. S1 in ESI, reveal that the high intensity methylene blue peak disappeared in the photodegraded final solution during photocatalysis under sunlight. The HPLC of final solution contains only water as compared with HPLC results of deionized water. This means that methylene blue is fully degraded into CO2 and H2O by the synthesized U3O8@ZnO photocatalyst under sunlight. Furthermore, the catalyst is stable after the degradation, which is confirmed by unchanged peaks of XRD pattern of the catalyst after using for degradation of methylene blue (ESI Fig. S2).

The efficient photocatalyst accelerates the photoreaction in the presence of light energy, which is absorbed by the catalyst causing electron migration from valance band (VB) to conduction band (CB) and creation of electron–hole pairs. Photo-induced reactions occurring at the surface of the catalyst depends on the rate of formation of electron–hole pairs. Holes generated in valance band, able to accept electron due to this holes breed generates various reactive oxygen species (ROSs) like ˙OH, ˙OOH, H2O2 in water medium are highly oxidizing in nature. This is crucial in degradation of organic substances by loss of electron. These species are responsible for the degradation of organic contaminants and disinfection of pathogenic microorganisms. Methylene blue is a cationic dye, which can easily adsorb on to the surface of the catalyst. This is favorable for efficient charge transfer.16

Semiconductors + → h+VB + eCB

h+VB + H2O → OH + H+

eCB + O2 → O2

R + ˙OH → R˙ + H2O

R + h+→ R˙+ → degradation of R

According to the literature degradation rate of MB using commercial amorphous anatase TiO2,9 bromophenol blue dye using ZnO flower like structure(∼96%, 120 min),1 cesium doped chromium oxide thin film synthesized using spray pyrolysis,17 graphene@TiO2 “dyade” like structure (88% degradation for 100 min),18 ZnO:Eu nanoparticles19 are lower than that of U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite and they degrade MB under exposure to UV light only.9 Therefore, this is a more effective photocatalyst than bare ZnO nanoparticles.


Crystalline U3O8@ZnO nanocomposite is successfully synthesized for the first time by co-precipitation with average particle size ranging from 18 nm to 30 nm. The synthesized materials is visible light active photocatalyst with bandgap of 2.9 eV. Also, 30 min irradiation of sunlight in the presence of 0.001 g of catalyst could degrade 250 ml of 5 ppm MB solution following first order kinetics. This clearly shows that the synthesized U3O8@ZnO material is a superfast photocatalyst. Therefore the synthesized photocatalyst is useful for industrial organic effluent treatment processes.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.


Authors thank C. A. Thennakoon, R. B. S. D. Rajapakshe and Dr K. G. Chathuranga Senarathna at University of Peradeniya for their enormous support. We also acknowledge National Research Council (Grant no. 16-123), Sri Lanka for partial financial assistance.

Notes and references

  1. S. Ameen, M. Shaheer Akhtar and H. Shik Shin, Mater. Lett., 2017, 209, 150–154 CrossRef CAS.
  2. X. Qu, P. J. J. Alvarez and Q. Li, Water Res., 2013, 47, 3931–3946 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. N. Guo, Y. Zeng, H. Li, X. Xu and H. Yu, Mater. Lett., 2017, 209, 417–420 CrossRef CAS.
  4. Q. Que, Y. Xing, Z. He, Y. Yang, X. Yin and W. Que, Mater. Lett., 2017, 209, 220–223 CrossRef CAS.
  5. Z. Zhu, Q. Han, D. Yu, J. Sun and B. Liu, Mater. Lett., 2017, 209, 379–383 CrossRef CAS.
  6. Y. C. Chang, J. Y. Guo and C. M. Chen, Mater. Lett., 2017, 209, 60–63 CrossRef CAS.
  7. R. Wahab, Y. Kim and H. Shin, Mater. Trans., 2009, 50, 2092–2097 CrossRef CAS.
  8. A. Rossberg, K. U. Ulrich, S. Weiss, S. Tsushima, T. Hiemstra and A. C. Scheinost, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 1400–1406 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. K. Bubacz, J. Choina, D. Dolat and A. W. Morawski, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2010, 19, 685–691 CAS.
  10. K. Fujiwara, H. Yamana, T. Fujii, K. Kawamoto, T. Sasaki and H. Moriyama, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 2005, 42, 289–294 CrossRef CAS.
  11. R. A. Reichle, K. G. McCurdy and L. G. Hepler, Can. J. Chem., 1975, 53, 3841–3845 CrossRef CAS.
  12. B. O. Loopstra, Acta Crystallogr., 1964, 17, 651–654 CrossRef CAS.
  13. M. J. Akhtar, M. Ahamed, S. Kumar, M. M. Khan, J. Ahmad and S. A. Alrokayan, Int. J. Nanomed., 2012, 7, 845 CAS.
  14. T. Chave, S. I. Nikitenko, A. C. Scheinost, C. Berthon, B. Arab-Chapelet and P. Moisy, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 6381–6383 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. L. L. Oliveira, Ana L. Dantas, S. S. Pedrosa, G. O. G. Rebouças, R. B. da Silva, J. M. de Araújo and A. S. Carriço, Phys. Rev. B, 2018, 97, 134413 CrossRef.
  16. A. Tuerdi, A. Abdukayum and P. Chen, Mater. Lett., 2017, 209, 235–239 CrossRef CAS.
  17. T. Larbi, M. A. Amara, B. Ouni and M. Amlouk, Mater. Res. Bull., 2017, 95, 152–162 CrossRef CAS.
  18. D. Zhao, G. Sheng, C. Chen and X. Wang, Appl. Catal., B, 2012, 111–112, 303–308 CrossRef CAS.
  19. L. V. Trandafilović, D. J. Jovanović, X. Zhang, S. Ptasińska and M. D. Dramićanin, Appl. Catal., B, 2017, 203, 740–752 CrossRef.


Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8na00051d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019