Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Total saponins from Rosa laevigata Michx fruit attenuates hepatic steatosis induced by high-fat diet in rats

Deshi Dong abc, Yan Qi a, Lina Xu a, Lianhong Yin a, Youwei Xu a, Xu Han a, Yanyan Zhao a and Jinyong Peng *ab
aCollege of Pharmacy, Dalian Medical University, 9 Western Lvshun South Road, Dalian 116044, China
bResearch Institute of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China. E-mail: jinyongpeng2005@163.com; Fax: +86411 8611 0411; Tel: +86 411 8611 0411
cThe First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

Received 26th July 2019 , Accepted 26th July 2019

First published on 6th August 2019


Abstract

Correction for ‘Total saponins from Rosa laevigata Michx fruit attenuates hepatic steatosis induced by high-fat diet in rats’ by Deshi Dong, et al., Food Funct., 2014, 5, 3065–3075.


The authors regret that there were errors in Fig. 4 and Fig. 6 in the original manuscript. The GAPDH bands in these figures for the western blot assay were incorrect due to copy and paste errors. The corrected versions of Fig. 4 and Fig. 6 are presented below.
image file: c9fo90039j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Effects of RLTS on the protein expressions of LXRα, PPARα, MCAD, ACADS, CYP2E1, CYP4A11, and the gene expressions of PPARγ, SREBP-1c, FAS, ACC, SCD1, CPT1 from rat livers in normal control (II), model (III), RLTS (70 mg kg−1) + HFD (IV), RLTS (140 mg kg−1) + HFD (V) and RLTS (210 mg kg−1) + HFD (VI) groups. Values were expressed as mean ± SD in each group (n = 5). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.

image file: c9fo90039j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Effects of RLTS on the protein expressions of HO-1, Nrf2, kEAP1, SOD2, ALDH7A1, NF-κB, COX-2, HMGB-1, AP-1, and the gene expressions of TNF-α, IL-6 from rat livers in normal control (II), model (III), RLTS (70 mg kg−1) + HFD (IV), RLTS (140 mg kg−1) + HFD (V) and RLTS (210 mg kg−1) + HFD (VI) groups. Values were expressed as mean ± SD in each group (n = 5). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. model group.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.