Z.
Ali
,
F.
Pacheco
,
E.
Litwiller
,
Y.
Wang
,
Y.
Han
and
I.
Pinnau
*
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Advanced Membranes and Porous Materials Center, Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: ingo.pinnau@kaust.edu.sa
First published on 10th October 2017
Purification is a major bottleneck in generating low-cost commercial hydrogen. In this work, inexpensive high-performance H2 separating membranes were fabricated by modifying the commercially successful interfacial polymerization production method for reverse osmosis membranes. Defect-free thin-film composite membranes were formed demonstrating unprecedented mixed-gas H2/CO2 selectivity of ≈50 at 140 °C with a H2 permeance of 350 GPU, surpassing the permeance/selectivity upper bound of all known polymer membranes by a wide margin. The combination of exceptional separation performance and low manufacturing cost makes them excellent candidates for cost-effective hydrogen purification from steam cracking and similar processes.
During steam cracking of natural gas to produce hydrogen (steam-methane reforming, SMR), methane and water are reformed to CO and H2 at ∼800 °C. The H2/CO mixture is then converted at about 350 °C into H2 and CO2. The composition of output streams can vary depending on the specific method employed. A typical SMR plant produces a H2/CO2 ratio of ∼75/20 with 5% methane and <1% of other impurities.6 Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants using biomass or coal feedstock can produce H2/CO2 ratios of ∼60/40.7 Currently about half of the globally synthesized hydrogen is used for the production of ammonia employed as a fertilizer by the Haber process, while most of the remaining half is utilized in hydrocracking i.e. breaking large hydrocarbons into smaller ones for use as fuel.8 Smaller quantities are used for the production of methanol, plastics, and pharmaceuticals, hydrogenation of oils, desulfurization of fuels, etc.8 Hydrogen production is currently growing at 10% annually, but it is estimated that availability of lower-cost hydrogen could immediately boost its use by 5- to 10-fold.9
To date, chemical separation processes have accounted for 10–15% of the global energy consumption.10 The state-of-the-art technologies for H2 purification, i.e. cryogenic distillation and pressure-swing adsorption, are extremely energy intensive, accounting for around 30% of the total plant capital and operating cost.11,12 Membrane-based H2/CO2 separation offers a potential path to reduce process costs and debottleneck H2 purification.
Table S1† lists the United States Department of Energy (USDOE) membrane performance targets for hydrogen purification from syngas mixtures.13,14 A number of materials are being considered for such separations, including inorganics such as carbon molecular sieves, zeolites, and metal membranes, as well as glassy polymers such as polybenzimidazole and polyimides with and without nanoparticles.15–25 The economic and environmental benefits of using membranes for H2/CO2 separation have been discussed by Merkel et al., suggesting that H2/CO2 selectivities greater than 10 can significantly reduce hydrogen production cost.7,14,26 Proteus™ by Membrane Technology & Research Inc. is a proprietary commercial membrane offering a H2/CO2 selectivity of approximately 11 with a H2 permeance of 500 GPU (1 GPU = 10−6 cm3 (STP) cm−2 s−1 cmHg−1) at 150 °C mixed-gas operation.14
Thin-film composite (TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes constitute the most successful implementation of membrane technology in large-scale industrial separation processes due to their unmatched combination of high water flux and salt rejection. Their high water flux results from the extremely thin selective polyamide layers made by interfacial polymerization (IP). Polymers made by this process have been applied widely for industrial use, including reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes as well as microcapsules.27
Fig. S3† shows the structure of the partially crosslinked fully aromatic polyamide layer fabricated by reacting m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) on polymeric supports, pioneered by Cadotte and commercially named FT-30.28 This TFC is currently employed in more than 15000 desalination plants, accounting for 90% of the global market.29 In commercial settings, FT-30-type RO membranes are produced by impregnating (via dipping or spraying) a highly porous support material (usually polysulfone) with MPD dissolved in water. Typically, excess solution is removed from the surface by using an air knife or a rubber roller. The diamine-soaked porous polysulfone support is then exposed to TMC dissolved in a hydrocarbon solvent (typically n-hexane or Isopar®) between 1 and 60 seconds.28 Most commonly, solutions in the IP process are applied at room temperature (20–25 °C). The membrane is then immediately exposed to high temperatures (∼80–100 °C) for drying and curing of the polyamide. Commercial RO membranes made by the IP process have been laboriously studied and reported in the literature with no usable gas separation properties. Gas permeation studies of dry FT-30-type RO membranes30–33 demonstrated Knudsen diffusion transport, implying the presence of mesoporous surface defects. Interestingly, Louie et al. demonstrated that plugging the surface defects by coating FT-30-type membranes with a rubbery polyether–polyamide block copolymer (PEBAX® 1657) showed some potential for H2/CO2 separation.32
In this work, the successful fabrication of highly crosslinked, ultra-selective, defect-free MPD-TMC polyamide thin-film composite molecular sieve membranes is reported for the first time for H2/CO2 separation. Pure- and mixed-gas permeation experiments were performed across a range of temperatures up to 140 °C. The TFCs were further characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The performance of these inexpensive high-performance membranes exceeded the USDOE targets and the H2/CO2 permeance/selectivity upper bound for polymer membranes by a wide margin.
Membrane | Reaction time (s) | Concentration (wt/vol%) | Temperature (°C) | m |
---|---|---|---|---|
FT-30 variant RO4 | Proprietary | |||
10s-0.1TMC-20C | 10 | 0.1 | 20 | N.M. |
60s-0.1TMC-20C | 60 | 0.1 | 20 | N.M. |
300s-0.1TMC-20C | 300 | 0.1 | 20 | 0.62 |
600s-0.1TMC-20C | 600 | 0.1 | 20 | N.M. |
300s-0.1TMC-60C | 300 | 0.1 | 60 | 0.66 |
300s-1TMC-60C | 300 | 1 | 60 | 0.55 |
300s-10TMC-60C | 300 | 10 | 60 | 0.39 |
300s-0.1TMC-100C | 300 | 0.1 | 100 | 0.89 |
Fig. 1(c) and (e) show the effects of varying TMC concentration and organic phase temperature on gas permeance properties of the TFCs. No significant variation in permeance was observed for helium (kinetic diameter (kd) = 2.60 Å) and hydrogen (kd = 2.89 Å) but a clear trend of decreasing permeance started to emerge for gases with kd values larger than 3 Å (O2, CO2, N2, and CH4).34 FTIR spectra (Fig. S5†) demonstrated no visible difference in polyamide chemistry for different fabricated samples compared to the 10s-0.1TMC-20C reference membrane. However, as TMC concentration decreased, the ratio of amine to acyl chloride functional groups increased as demonstrated by XPS analysis, indicating an increase in the degree of crosslinking (Table 1). This resulted in tightening of the polyamide network, consequently hindering the transport of larger gas molecules while no significant effect was observed for smaller gases (He and H2), which resulted in a significant boost in selectivity. Similarly, increasing the organic-phase temperature also increased the degree of crosslinking, which lowered the permeance of gases larger than H2 thereby significantly enhancing selectivity. Presumably, the increase in reaction-zone temperature increased the overall reaction rate as well as solubility and diffusivity of MPD in the organic phase (reaction-zone), resulting in increased formation of amide linkages and, hence, increased crosslinking.35
Fig. 1(d) and (f) show the membrane performance results expressed in terms of selectivity. High selectivity for H2/CO2 and negligible selectivity for He/H2 imply a primary molecular-sieve-like cut-off at around 3 Å. This is clearly displayed in the XRD spectrum of the MPD-TMC powder in Fig. S6,† showing a main amorphous peak with an average chain d-spacing centered around 3.5 Å. As m increased from 0.39 to 0.66, the selectivity of hydrogen over CO2, O2, N2 and CH4 increased, implying increased ultramicroporosity. As the degree of crosslinking increased further from 0.66 to 0.89, N2 and CH4 permeance decreased (kd values for N2 and CH4 are 3.64 Å and 3.80 Å, respectively) but CO2 and O2 permeances remained unaffected. As a direct consequence, O2/N2, CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 selectivities increased (Fig. S7†). These are all significant industrial gas separation applications for implementation of membrane technology.
SEM images, Fig. S8(a–l) and S9(a–d),† illustrate that the TFCs of this study have typical average visual polyamide ridge-and-valley-based film thicknesses of approximately 100–300 nm.36 However, it has been suggested that there is an appreciable difference between the observed average cross-sectional thickness and the actual effective thickness of the selective layer. The apparent visual thickness has been conventionally considered the true thickness of the polyamide barrier layer;35,37 however, more recent research has indicated that the effective thickness of the separation layer lies around the order of only 10–20 nm.36,38,39 The cross-sections of the defective FT-30-type reference membrane (10s-0.1TMC-20C) and the defect-free, highly gas-selective polyamide TFC of this work (300s-0.1TMC-100C) are shown in Fig. 2. Although it is difficult to clearly assign a thickness to the ultrathin selective polyamide barrier layer of both membrane types, it is clear that the PA layer is thicker and more tightly packed in the membrane made with both longer reaction time and higher reaction temperature (Fig. 2(b)).
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 SEM cross section of (a) 10s-0.1TMC-20 and (b) 300–0.1TMC-100C highlighting the variation of morphology for lowest and highest performing samples, respectively. |
Gas permeation data for an aromatic network polyamide based on MPD and TMC are not available because isotropic films cannot be produced due to the inherent insolubility of the crosslinked polymer. However, Weinkauf, Kim and Paul40 reported the gas permeation properties of thick films of a related linear, amorphous aromatic polyamide made from phenylenediamine isomers and terephthaloyl chloride. The isotropic poly(phenylene terephthalamide) films used in their study were ∼25–100 μm thick and demonstrated gas barrier behavior with O2 and CO2 permeabilities at 35 °C of only 0.026 and 0.1 Barrer, respectively (1 Barrer = 1 × 10−10 cm3 (STP) cm cm−2 s−1 cmHg−1). Because of their extremely low gas permeabilities, aromatic polyamides have been rarely considered for membrane-based gas separation processes.41 However, as demonstrated here, this disadvantage can be overcome by fabricating ultra-thin films allowing the exploitation of highly selective barrier materials with industrially useable performance characteristics.
Fig. 3(a) shows the performance of the 300s-0.1TMC-100C membrane as a function of temperature using pure-gas H2 and CO2 measurements. Permeance for both gases showed excellent Arrhenius regression with temperature (ESI Section 11†). H2 experienced a larger increase in permeance compared to CO2 presumably due to reduced sorption of CO2 at higher temperatures. At 140 °C, H2 permeance increased to 275 ± 4 GPU with a H2/CO2 selectivity of 95.5 ± 5, the highest reported pure-gas selectivity to date for any polymer membrane. Activation energies for H2 and CO2 were calculated to be 8.50 and 1.20 kJ mol−1, respectively. The surprisingly lower activation energy of permeation for CO2 than H2 was previously observed by Li et al. for a series of polybenzimidazoles.23 It was suggested that the smaller relative increase in CO2 permeability with temperature resulted from strong CO2–polymer interactions. Weinkauf et al. observed a similar trend for aromatic polyamides and evidenced strong polymer/CO2 interactions by large negative CO2 heat of sorption values.40
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 (a) TFC membrane (300s-0.1TMC-100C) pure-gas temperature dependence for H2 and CO2, and (b) Robeson plot for performance comparison of the TFC membrane studied here (300s-0.1TMC-100C) with other membrane types. Permeance/selectivity upper bound adapted from Robeson (2008) assuming 1 μm-thick films.42 USDOE target membrane requirements for H2/CO2 separation13,14 and performance data for MTR Proteus™,14 ZIF-8/PBI,19 and PEBAX-coated SWC4 (PEBAX-SWC4).32 |
Mixed-gas separation was conducted using a 1:
1 H2/CO2 feed at 140 °C to provide more realistic performance data in industrial systems. Fig. 3(b) shows pure- and mixed-gas data for the 300s-0.1TMC-100C membrane compared to state-of-the-art polymer membranes in the permeance/selectivity plot for H2/CO2 separation.42 An average stabilized H2 permeate concentration of 98% was achieved, translating to an unprecedented mixed-gas separation factor of 50 ± 4 with a hydrogen permeance of 350 ± 15 GPU at 140 °C. Our mixed-gas permeation results clearly demonstrated unparalleled performance of the defect-free polyamide TFCs for H2/CO2 separation with properties far exceeding those of all state-of-the-art polymer membranes when tested under industrially relevant conditions. It is important to note that the aromatic polyamide is thermally stable up to ∼300 °C (Fig. S10†). However, the upper operational temperature of the TFC membranes reported here is limited by the thermal stability of the porous polysulfone support. Hence, future developments of TFC membranes for high-temperature H2/CO2 separation (∼200–300 °C) must be directed towards the development of a more thermally stable porous support.
Fortuitously, these ultra-high-performance membranes can be produced by making only small changes to existing commercial membrane manufacturing processes by interfacial polymerization. Therefore, their fabrication cost should be similar to those of standard RO membranes of only ≈1–2 $ per ft2,43 which would lower the membrane cost by 50–100-fold based on the DOE target value of 100 $ per ft2. This study demonstrated that varying fabrication parameters can tune permselectivity to meet the needs of specific processes. A few simple modifications to a time-tested commercial membrane fabrication process can produce membranes that meet a key industrial need. With rapidly developing economic and environmental pressures to increase efficiencies for separation processes, such highly selective, low-cost, commercial barrier materials fabricated as ultra-thin films show potential for a paradigm shift to streamline the industrial use of membranes for hydrogen separations.
TFCs based on MPD and TMC also demonstrated remarkable selectivity for O2/N2, CO2/CH4, H2/N2 and CO2/N2 separations. However, the most promising TFC membrane for H2/CO2 separation (300s-0.1TMC-100C) exhibited very low CO2 and O2 permeances of only 1.8 and 0.4 GPU, respectively. Recent work by Tsai et al. demonstrated more promising results for O2/N2 separation for interfacially polymerized TFCs made by the reaction of TMC with piperazine.44
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Materials, methods, FTIR, XPS, XRD, TGA, FESEM, and gas permeation data. See DOI: 10.1039/c7ta07819f |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 |