Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Solubility of sulfur dioxide in tetraglyme-NH4SCN ionic liquid: high absorption efficiency

Qiang Xu, Wei Jiang, Jianbai Xiao and Xionghui Wei*
College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, 100871, PR China. E-mail: xhwei@pku.edu.cn

Received 30th October 2018 , Accepted 11th December 2018

First published on 18th December 2018


Abstract

An easily prepared ionic liquid was synthesized by a one-step method and applied in SO2 absorption efficiently. The cation of the ionic liquid is a supramolecular structure consisting of NH+4 and tetraglyme, similar to the structure of NH+4 and crown ether, and the anion is selected as SCN. The ionic liquid has good thermal stability. Under the conditions of 293 K and 1 bar, one mol ionic liquid can absorb 2.73 mol SO2, which is about 30% higher than tetraglyme. The absorption mechanism was characterized using IR and NMR. And the results confirmed that the interaction mechanism between SO2 and the ionic liquid is a physical interaction rather than a chemical interaction.


1. Introduction

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a common atmospheric pollutant mainly derived from the burning of fossil fuels.1 SO2 emitted from flue gas will cause serious harm to the natural environment2 and human health.3 In recent years, the theme of removing SO2 gas from flue gas has attracted widespread attention around the world. At present, a limestone/lime based FGD method is the most widely used flue gas desulfurization technology in industrial practice.4,5 However, this method produces a large amount of secondary pollution such as gypsum and industrial wastewater, along with low limestone utilization and poor selectivity, which is difficult to overcome.6 Therefore, the development of new desulfurizers with good absorption capacity, selectivity, regenerability, thermal stability and an environmentally friendly nature has become one of the current research hotspots.

Recently, ionic liquids (ILs), as new candidate solvents to absorb SO2 in flue gas, have been widely studied due to their low saturated vapor pressure,7 high thermal and chemical stability, and excellent solubility to some substances.8 The ionic liquids used for SO2 absorption mainly include the following types: guanidinium ionic liquid,9–13 hydroxyl ammonium ionic liquid,14–16 imidazolium ionic liquid,17–21 tetrabutyl ammonium ionic liquid22–24 and quaternary phosphine ionic liquids.25 However, these ionic liquids are relatively weak in their ability to absorb SO2. One reason is that they were not originally designed to absorb SO2 and therefore are not optimized for SO2 absorption. The ability of an ionic liquid to absorb SO2 is closely related to the type of cation and anion of the ionic liquid itself. For example, the absorption capacity of [C4Py][BF4] ionic liquid at 293 K and 0.1 MPa is 0.440 g g−1 ionic liquid, which is better than that of [C8Py][BF4] (0.378 g g−1 ionic liquid) but weaker than [C4Py][SCN] (0.841 g g−1 ionic liquid).26

In order to improve the absorption capacity of ionic liquids, researchers prepared a variety of functional ionic liquids. There are two main types of functional ionic liquids, including ether functional ionic liquids27–31 and amine functional ionic liquids.32–34 The latter generally has poor selectivity and desorption ability due to its chemical interaction with SO2. In contrast, the former have better absorption ability and superior selectivity than those of the original ionic liquids due to the physical interaction between the ether functional groups and SO2.

As a functional group, ether groups, mainly referred to herein as ethylene glycol and its derivatives, have good absorption capacity and good regenerability for SO2, thus giving it a wide range of potential industrial applications.35,36 However, ethylene glycol and its derivatives alone have two disadvantages that are difficult to overcome. One is its less prominent SO2 absorption capacity and the other is its relatively high vapor pressure. The latter causes it to be more volatile during the absorption–regeneration process, which in turn leads to excessive solvent loss. The introduction of ethylene glycol and its derivatives into ionic liquids could effectively solve the above two problems. As functional groups in the ether-based ionic liquid, ethylene glycol and its derivatives make the ether-based ionic liquids have many of the advantages mentioned above in absorbing SO2.

Conventional ether functional ionic liquids are difficult to industrialize due to their complicated synthesis and high cost. A simple one-step method by mixing and stirring was developed for ionic liquid synthesis. And this type ionic liquids have been used in nonaqueous electrolytes in Li batteries37,38 and CO2 absorption.39 This method is dedicated to solving the problem that conventional ionic liquids are difficult to synthesize. We have previously prepared a series of glycine-lithium salt ionic liquids and studied their absorption of SO2.40 These readily synthesized glyme-lithium salt ionic liquids have a greater thermal stability than glymes while maintaining similar SO2 absorption capabilities. However, the higher price of lithium salt leads to higher cost of preparation of the corresponding ionic liquid, which severely limits the application of the ionic liquid in desulfurization. In order to solve this problem and further improve the absorption capacity of ionic liquids for SO2, a novel ether-based ionic liquid with advantages of simple synthesis, strong absorption capacity and low cost has been developed.

This ionic liquid was synthesized by tetraglyme (G4) and NH4SCN, and its structure is shown in Fig. 1. In order to increase the SO2 absorption capacity of the ionic liquid, SCN was chosen as the anion. The absorption and desorption performance of the ionic liquid were investigated. The interaction mechanism between the ionic liquid and SO2 was also studied by infrared spectroscopy (IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).


image file: c8ra08991d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Structure of [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid before and after absorbing SO2.

2. Experimental section

2.1 Chemicals

Tetraglyme (AR) was purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., LTD, and NH4SCN (AR) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. All reagents were used without further purification. Chromatographic grade ethanol and distilled water are also used for this work. Certified standard pure SO2 gas (>99.9%) and N2 (99.9% purity) supplied by Beijing Gas Centre, Peking University (China) is used to determine the SO2 absorption capacity of the ionic liquid.

2.2 Preparation of the ionic liquid

Tetraglyme and NH4SCN were mixed in a molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, and then the liquid mixture was stirred and heated at 303 K for 6 hours, so that [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid can be obtained. The ionic liquid was then dried under vacuum for 48 hours at room temperature. The resulting ionic liquid is a clear, pale yellow liquid.

2.3 Absorption and desorption of SO2

The absorption and desorption experiments of SO2 were carried out in an absorption tube with an inner diameter of 15 mm. SO2 at a flow rate of 100 mL min−1 was bubbled through the absorbent tube containing absorber sample. The constant temperature required for absorption and regeneration is maintained by a circulating water bath into which the absorber tube is immersed. The absorption capacity of SO2 was determined by means of weighing. In the absorption experiments under different pressures, a mixed gas having different partial pressures of SO2 was obtained by controlling the flow rates of SO2 and N2. In the regeneration experiment, the temperature was maintained at 353 K, and the flow rate of nitrogen was 100 mL min−1. And the analytical method was similar to that of absorption.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Properties of the ionic liquid

The conductivity of the ionic liquid was measured to be 1528 μS cm−1. In contrast, tetraglyme itself has a conductivity of 0. The viscosity of ionic liquid is 104 mPa s at 298 K, which is 31 times that of tetraglyme (3.295 mPa s (ref. 41)) at the same temperature.

The ionic liquid was characterized by MS, NMR and IR. The result of MS is shown in Fig. S1 in ESI. It can be clearly seen that the ionic liquid has a cationic molecular weight of about 240.2, which is the sum of the molecular weight of tetraglyme and the molecular weight of ammonium ion. It is reasonably speculated that cation in ionic liquid should consist of an ammonium ion and a tetraglyme molecule with a structure similar to that of crown ether–ammonium ion, as shown in Fig. 1.

An external reference (CDCl3) method was used in 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR to avert the solvent effect by the deuterated reagents. The chemical shifts of the H atoms are shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen from the figure that the chemical shifts of the hydrogen atoms in the ether functional group move to the high field, and the chemical shifts change from 3.95, 3.85, and 3.69 of tetraglyme to 3.88, 3.81 and 3.61 of the ionic liquid, respectively. The main reason for the change in chemical shifts is that the deshielding effect caused by oxygen atoms is inhibited in virtue of the interaction between NH+4 and the oxygen atoms in tetraglyme group. The chemical shift of the H atom attached to the N atom appears at 7.05. Further, solvents having different molar ratio of tetraglyme and NH4SCN including 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.2, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.4, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.6 and 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.8, was prepared and the 1H-NMR spectra is shown in Fig. S2 in ESI. According to the spectra, H atoms of NH+4 ions at different solvents above have similar chemical shifts, which means that the interaction strength between NH+4 ions and tetraglyme is close in several different solvents including the ionic liquid. The chemical shifts of the H atom in tetraglyme group also moves to the high field as the NH4SCN content increases in the solvents, which confirms the deshielding effect is inhibited in the ionic liquid.


image file: c8ra08991d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 1H-NMR spectra of tetraglyme, tetraglyme after SO2 absorption, [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] and [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] after SO2 absorption, with CDCl3 as an external reference.

However, in the 13C-NMR spectrum shown in Fig. 3, there is no significant change in the chemical shifts of the tetraglyme carbon atoms after the formation of the ionic liquid. This indicates that there is no significant interaction between NH+4 and the carbon atoms of tetraglyme group in the ionic liquid. The existing ion–dipole interaction and hydrogen bonding between the two substances mainly occur between the hydrogen atoms of NH+4 and the oxygen atoms of tetraglyme.


image file: c8ra08991d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 13C-NMR spectra of tetraglyme, tetraglyme after SO2 absorption, [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] and [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] after SO2 absorption, with CDCl3 as an external reference.

Fig. 4 is an IR spectrum of tetraglyme and [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid before and after SO2 absorption. There is no significant shift in the C–O vibration peak at 1110 cm−1 and the C–C vibration peak at 1430 cm−1, when tetraglyme forms an ionic liquid with NH4SCN. A closer comparison of the spectra of the two materials reveals another difference: the ionic liquid has a distinct absorption peak of SCN at 2064 cm−1. Meanwhile, tetraglyme has a C–H vibration peak at 2876 cm−1, but after the formation of ionic liquid, the displacement of this absorption peak changes significantly, which in turn produces a huge absorption peak between 2827 cm−1 and 3184 cm−1. This phenomenon indicates that after the formation of the ionic liquid, a very strong hydrogen bond is formed between the tetraglyme and the NH+4, resulting in a significant change in the position of the C–H bond in the tetraglyme molecular.


image file: c8ra08991d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 IR spectra of tetraglyme, tetraglyme after SO2 absorption, [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] and [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] after SO2 absorption.

The result of thermogravimetric analysis of tetraglyme and [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid is shown in Fig. 5. It shows that the initial decomposition temperature of tetraglyme and the ionic liquid is 371 K and 389 K, respectively. It can be seen that the thermal stability of the [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid is significantly better than that of tetraglyme itself. It was further noted that the temperature of the absorption experiment did not exceed 313 K, and the temperature of the desorption experiment was 353 K. This means that the normal operating temperature of the desulfurizer will generally not exceed 353 K. Therefore, we performed a constant temperature thermogravimetric experiment on [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid and tetraglyme at 353 K. The results are shown in Fig. S3 in ESI. As can be seen from the figure, tetraglyme has a higher volatility at 353 K, while the thermal stability of ether ionic liquid is rather low. This means that latter has satisfactory volatilization rate during the absorption–desorption process of the desulfurization experiment, avoiding excessive solvent loss in practical applications, thereby reducing the cost of desulfurization and avoiding environmental hazards caused by volatilization as much as possible.


image file: c8ra08991d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Thermal gravimetric analysis of tetraglyme and [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid.

Further thermal analysis experiments confirmed the strength of tetraglyme and NH4SCN, as shown in Fig. S4 in ESI. According to DSC and TGA results, the interaction strength of tetraglyme and NH4SCN is about 4.03 kJ mol−1 at 373 K, which is close to the interaction strength between 15-crown-5 and NH4Cl.42,43

3.2 Absorption capacity of ionic liquid

The absorption capacity of SO2 at different temperatures and 1 bar is measured as shown in Fig. 6. It can be clearly seen that as the temperature increases, the absorption capacity of both the tetraglyme and the ionic liquid on the SO2 gas is decreased. However, at all temperatures studied, the ionic liquid has an absorption capacity that is about 30% higher than that of tetraglyme. At the condition of 293 K and 1 bar, 1 mol this ionic liquid can absorb about 2.73 mol of SO2 Correspondingly, the absorption capacity of tetraglyme is 2.10 mol. The result of the unit mass absorption capacity of tetraglyme and the ionic liquid is shown in Fig. S5 in ESI. And it is apparent that the ionic liquid has a better unit mass absorption capacity than tetraglyme at the temperature exceeding 303 K.
image file: c8ra08991d-f6.tif
Fig. 6 SO2 absorption capacities of tetraglyme and [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] at different temperatures with the pressure of SO2 equal to 1 bar.

The effect of SO2 partial pressure on the absorption of SO2 by ionic liquid has also been investigated. The results are shown in Fig. 7. As can be seen from the figure, when the SO2 volume fraction is increased from 20% to 100%, the absorption of the ionic liquid is increased from 0.61 mol SO2 pre mol ionic liquid to 2.73 mol SO2 pre mol ionic liquid at 293 K. It can be seen that with the increase of the volume fraction of SO2 gas, the absorption of SO2 by the ionic liquid gradually increases, and both the two variables have a linear relationship. This suggests that the absorption between the ionic liquid and SO2 should be dominated by physical interaction.


image file: c8ra08991d-f7.tif
Fig. 7 SO2 absorption capacities of tetraglyme and [NH+4-tetraglyme][SCN] at different SO2 partial pressures under the temperature of 293 K and 303 K.

The SO2 absorption capacities of solvents with different molar ratio of tetraglyme and NH4SCN were also test and the results are shown in Fig. 8. Under the condition of 303 K and 1 bar, the solvents have similar unit mass absorption from 0.41 g g−1 to 0.44 g g−1. However, it should be noted that the absorption per mole of solvent increased from 1.50 mol to 2.02 mol, as the NH4SCN content increases from 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0.2 to 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1. The increase of molar absorption is presumed to originate from the influence of SCN in the solvents.


image file: c8ra08991d-f8.tif
Fig. 8 SO2 absorption capacities of solvents with different NH4SCN and tetraglyme molar ratio under the condition of 303 K and 1 bar.

3.3 Regeneration

Based on these behaviors of the ionic liquid, after the ionic liquid absorbs SO2, it can be desorbed by heating, nitrogen stripping or vacuum depressurization. Here, the desorption ability of the ionic liquid after absorbing SO2 was studied by a heating with nitrogen stripping method. The results show that after five absorption–desorption cycles, the absorption of SO2 by [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid still have 99% capacity of the initial absorption, and the desorption rate reaches 98% (see Fig. S6 in ESI). It can be seen that the [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ether ionic liquid has good absorption and desorption properties at the same time, which makes the absorbing-stripping process possible. Apparently, the negligible volatilization loss of the solvent facilitates its industrial application.

3.4 Mechanism

Tetraglyme has been proved that it has good absorption of SO2 and regenerative capacity, due to the physical interaction between tetraglyme and SO2.36,44 As the ionic liquid exhibits better absorption and similar regeneration performance than tetraglyme, it is speculated that there is a large similarity in the absorption mechanism between them. 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and IR are further used in the study of absorption mechanisms.

SO2 has the characteristics of three absorption peaks in the infrared spectrum.45 The antisymmetric stretching vibration peak around 1330 cm−1 and the bending vibration peak near 528 cm−1 can be seen clearly after the ionic liquid absorbs SO2. However, the symmetric stretching vibration peak at 1150 cm−1 overlaps with the position of the C–O vibration peak, thereby covering the vibration peak of SO2. This result is quite consistent with the infrared spectrum before and after SO2 absorption by tetraglyme alone. There was no significant change in the large absorption peaks of 2827 cm−1 to 3184 cm−1 before and after absorption of SO2, indicating that NH+4 itself had little effect on SO2 absorption, and the supramolecular structure of the cation still retains after absorbing SO2. Comparing the infrared spectrum of the ionic liquid before and after SO2 absorption, it can be seen that there is no significant change in the position of all absorption peaks of ionic liquid, and no new absorption peaks were produced except for the absorption peak of SO2. This indicates that after the ionic liquid absorbs SO2, there is no new chemical bond formation in the system, and the main interaction between SO2 and the ionic liquid is the physical interaction.

As can be seen from the 1H-NMR data of Fig. 2, when the tetraglyme and the ionic liquid absorb SO2, the chemical shifts of all hydrogen atoms move toward the lower field. After the absorption of SO2 by tetraglyme, the chemical shifts of hydrogen atoms move from 3.95, 3.85, 3.69 to 4.18, 4.09, 3.88, respectively. And the absorption of SO2 by [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid causes the chemical shift of hydrogen atoms to move from 3.88, 3.81, 3.61 to 4.18, 4.10, 3.88, respectively. It can be seen that the two solvents have similar chemical shift changes after SO2 absorption and the moving directions of the two substances are consistent because the displacement change is caused by the magnetic susceptibility anisotropy due to the aromatic circulation effect of SO2. This means that the absorption mechanism of the SO2 by the tetraglyme group of the ionic liquid is similar to that of the tetraglyme absorbing SO2 alone, that is, the physical interaction plays a major role. Further, the chemical shift of H on NH+4 also moves, and the single peak changes to a triple peak after the absorption of SO2, which means that the structure of ionic liquid cations gets more rigid.

In the 13C-NMR spectrum shown in Fig. 3, we can see that there is no significant changes in the chemical shift of the tetraglyme group carbon atom after the ionic liquid absorbing SO2. However, it should be noted that after the absorption of SO2 by the ionic liquid, the chemical shift of carbon atoms in SCN has changed noticeable from 132.06 to 130.04. The ion–dipole interaction between SCN and SO2 is assumed to cause the nitrogen atom on the SCN to reduce a deshielding effect on the carbon atoms on it, leading the chemical shift of its carbon atoms to move toward the high field. The chemical shifts of other carbon atoms are not significantly changed. This indicates that the interaction that causes the ionic liquid to significantly enhance the absorption capacity of SO2 mainly occurs between SO2 and the carbon atom of the SCN, rather than the carbon atoms of tetraglyme.

In summary, based on the above spectral results and by comparing SO2 absorption capacity of solvents with different molar ratios of tetraglyme and NH4SCN, it is considered that the charge transfer between SO2 and the cation in the ionic liquid plays a major role in the process of SO2 absorption by the ionic liquid, and the van der Waals force between SO2 and SCN also plays an important role, which make the molar absorption of ionic liquid to increase about 30% compared with that of tetraglyme.

3.5 Comparison of SO2 absorption capacity in different ionic liquids

In order to evaluate the absorption performance of this ionic liquid, we compared it with other ionic liquids, as shown in Table 1. [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] exhibits satisfactory SO2 absorption capacity under the same conditions compared with other ionic liquids, and its ability to absorb SO2 exceeds that of most non-functionalized ionic liquids. And it shows excellent regeneration ability. Moreover, compared with other traditional ionic liquids and functional ionic liquids, this kind of ionic liquid has the advantages of low cost and easy synthesis, making it more conducive to practical application.
Table 1 Comparison of SO2 absorption capacity in different ionic liquids46
Ionic liquids Absorption temperature (K) Absorption Capacity at 1 bar (mol SO2/mol IL)
a 1.2 bar.b 1.1 bar.
[NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] 293 2.73
[TMG][L]9 313 1.7a
[TMG][BF4]10 293 1.27
[BMIM][BF4]10 293 1.50
[TMG][PhO]13 293 2.58
[TEA][L]14 298 0.983
[N2224][dimalonate]22 313 1.88
[HMPY][NTf2]17 298 1.092b
[BMIM][OAc]19 298 1.91
[BMIM][MeSO4]19 298 2.11
[P666614][Tetz]32 293 3.72
[P666614][BenIm]25 293 5.75
[E3mim][Tetz]31 303 4.43
[E0mim][MeSO3]30 303 2.30
[E8mim][MeSO3]30 303 6.30
[Emim][SCN]34 293 2.99
PEG150MeDABCONTf2 (ref. 27) 298 4.38


4. Conclusion

[NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] ionic liquid was prepared and its absorption capacity and absorption mechanism of SO2 were studied. Ammonium ion forms a relatively stable supramolecular structure through ion–dipole interaction and hydrogen bonding with tetraglyme, and this supermolecule structure is the cationic portion of the ionic liquid. This ionic liquid has remarkable features such as easy to prepare, low cost, and high thermal stability. This makes it possible for the ionic liquid to be a promising candidate to be applied in desulfurization absorbing–regenerating chemical process. [NH4-tetraglyme][SCN] has strong absorption and desorption capacity for SO2 and one mol the ionic liquid can absorb about 30% more SO2 than tetraglyme. The results of IR and NMR experiments confirmed that the interaction mechanism between SO2 and the ionic liquid is physical interaction rather than chemical interaction, which makes it easier to desorb SO2 from the ionic liquid in the regeneration process.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Notes and references

  1. M. A. Siddiqi, J. Krissmann, P. Peters-Gerth, M. Luckas and K. Lucas, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 1996, 28, 685–700 CrossRef CAS.
  2. Y. J. Du, M. L. Wei, K. R. Reddy, Z. P. Liu and F. Jin, J. Hazard. Mater., 2014, 271, 131–140 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. J. D. Spengler, B. G. Ferris Jr, D. W. Dockery and F. E. Speizer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1979, 13, 1276–1280 CrossRef CAS.
  4. Y. Shao, D. He, C. Qin, J. Ran and L. Zhang, Greenhouse Gases: Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 637–648 CrossRef CAS.
  5. M. Teramoto, Q. Huang, T. Maki and H. Matsuyama, Sep. Purif. Technol., 1999, 16, 109–118 CrossRef CAS.
  6. Y. H. Dang, Y. H. Qi and H. F. Wang, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2010, 22, 1–6 CAS.
  7. M. J. Earle, J. M. S. S. Esperança, M. A. Gilea, J. N. Canongia Lopes, L. P. N. Rebelo, J. W. Magee, K. R. Seddon and J. A. Widegren, Nature, 2006, 439, 831–834 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. J. L. Anderson, R. Ding, A. A. Ellern and D. W. Armstrong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 593–604 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. W. Z. Wu, B. X. Han, H. X. Gao, Z. M. Liu, T. Jiang and J. Huang, Angew. Chem., 2004, 43, 2415–2417 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. J. Huang, A. Riisager, P. Wasserscheid and R. Fehrmann, Chem. Commun., 2006, 4027–4029 RSC.
  11. Y. Wang, C. Wang, L. Zhang and H. Li, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10, 5976–5982 RSC.
  12. G. Yu and X. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2011, 115, 3466–3477 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. Y. Shang, H. Li, S. Zhang, H. Xu, Z. Wang, L. Zhang and J. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 175, 324–329 CAS.
  14. X. L. Yuan, S. J. Zhang and X. M. Lu, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2007, 2, 596–599 CrossRef.
  15. S. H. Ren, Y. C. Hou, W. Z. Wu, Q. Y. Liu, Y. F. Xiao and X. T. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2010, 114, 2175 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. S. H. Ren, Y. C. Hou, W. Z. Wu and M. J. Jin, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 50, 998–1002 CrossRef.
  17. J. L. Anderson, J. K. Dixon, E. J. Maginn and J. F. Brennecke, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 15059–15062 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. L. J. A. Siqueira, R. A. Ando, F. F. C. Bazito, R. M. Torresi, P. S. Santos and M. C. C. Ribeiro, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 6430–6435 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. M. B. Shiflett and A. Yokozeki, Energy Fuels, 2010, 24, 1001–1008 CrossRef CAS.
  20. M. B. Shiflett and A. Yokozeki, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2010, 49, 1370–1377 CrossRef CAS.
  21. S. D. Tian, Y. C. Hou, W. Z. Wu, S. H. Ren and C. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 3572–3577 RSC.
  22. K. Huang, G. N. Wang, Y. Dai, Y. T. Wu, X. B. Hu and Z. B. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 16264–16269 RSC.
  23. B. Guo, E. Duan, A. Ren, Y. Wang and H. Liu, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2010, 55, 1398–1401 CrossRef CAS.
  24. K. Huang, Y. L. Chen, X. M. Zhang, S. Xia, Y. T. Wu and X. B. Hu, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 237, 478–486 CrossRef CAS.
  25. G. Cui, W. Lin, F. Ding, X. Luo, X. He, H. Li and C. Wang, Green Chem., 2014, 3, 1211–1216 RSC.
  26. S. Zeng, H. Gao, X. Zhang, H. Dong, X. Zhang and S. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 25, 248–256 CrossRef.
  27. Z. Z. Yang, L. N. He, Q. W. Song, K. H. Chen, A. H. Liu and X. M. Liu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 15832–15839 RSC.
  28. A. Yokozeki and M. B. Shiflett, Energy Fuels, 2009, 23, 4701–4708 CrossRef CAS.
  29. X. Meng, J. Wang, H. Jiang, X. Zhang and S. Liu, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2017, 92, 767–774 CrossRef CAS.
  30. S. Y. Hong, J. Im, J. Palgunadi, L. D. Sang, J. S. Lee and H. S. Kim, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 1802–1806 RSC.
  31. G. Cui, C. Wang, J. Zheng, Y. Guo, X. Luo and H. Li, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 2633–2635 RSC.
  32. C. Wang, G. Cui, X. Luo, Y. Xu, H. Li and S. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 11916–11919 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. G. K. Cui, J. J. Zheng, X. Y. Luo, W. J. Lin, F. Ding, H. R. Liand and C. M. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 10620–10624 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. C. M. Wang, J. J. Zheng, G. K. Cui, X. Y. Luo, Y. Guo and H. R. Li, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1166–1168 RSC.
  35. J. Zhang, Q. Li, Z. Guo and X. Wei, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2010, 50, 395–401 Search PubMed.
  36. S. Sun, Y. Niu, Z. Sun, Q. Xu and X. Wei, RSC Adv., 2014, 5, 8706–8712 RSC.
  37. T. Takashi, Y. Kazuki, H. Takeshi, T. Mizuho, N. Megumi, K. Yuichi, T. Naoki, D. Kaoru and W. Masayoshi, Chem. Lett., 2010, 7, 753–755 Search PubMed.
  38. H. Kwon, M. L. Thomas, R. Tatara, Y. Oda, Y. Kobayashi, A. Nakanishi, K. Ueno, K. Dokko and M. Watanabe, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 7, 6014–6021 CrossRef PubMed.
  39. C. Wang, Y. Guo, X. Zhu, G. Cui, H. Li and S. Dai, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6526–6528 RSC.
  40. S. Sun, Y. Niu, Q. Xu, Z. Sun and X. Wei, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 46564–46567 RSC.
  41. A. Pal and G. Dass, J. Mol. Liq., 2000, 84, 327–337 CrossRef CAS.
  42. C. C. Liou and J. S. Brodbelt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 17, 6761–6764 CrossRef.
  43. V. P. Vasil'ev, M. N. Goncharova, T. V. Balashova, T. D. Orlova and V. V. Chernikov, Russ. J. Coord. Chem., 2001, 6, 377–380 CrossRef.
  44. K. A. G. Schmidt and A. E. Mather, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2001, 6, 946–960 Search PubMed.
  45. R. H. Maybury, S. Gordon and J. J. Katz, J. Chem. Phys., 1955, 23, 1277–1281 CrossRef CAS.
  46. K. Huang, S. Xia, X. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Wu and X. Hu, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2014, 4, 1202–1212 CrossRef.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c8ra08991d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018