Open Access Article
Marta Czarnecka*a,
Marta Świtalskab,
Joanna Wietrzykb,
Gabriela Maciejewskac and
Anna Gliszczyńska
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 25, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland. E-mail: anna.gliszczynska@wp.pl; marta.b.czarnecka@gmail.com
bDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Science, Weigla 12, 53-114 Wrocław, Poland
cCentral Laboratory of the Instrumental Analysis, Wrocław University of Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370, Wrocław, Poland
First published on 19th October 2018
A series of eight novel phosphatidylcholines containing cinnamic or 3-methoxycinnamic acids (3a-b, 5a-b, 9a-b, 10a-b) at sn-1 and/or sn-2 positions were synthesized and tested for their antiproliferative activity in an in vitro model against representative six human cancer cell lines (MV4-11, A549, MCF-7, LoVo, LoVo/DX, HepG2) and a normal cell line BALB/3T3. The structures of the new compounds were confirmed by spectral analysis. Biological evaluation revealed that all the tested conjugates exhibited higher antitumor activity than the corresponding free aromatic acids. Compounds 3b and 9b turned out to be the most active, with IC50 values of 32.1 and 30.5 μM against the LoVo/DX and MV4-11 cell lines, respectively. Studies of the mechanism of the antitumor action were carried out for 1-palmitoyl-2-cinnamoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (5a), and it was shown to be active toward almost all the tested types of cancer cells, showing that this compound could effectively arrest the cell cycle in G2/M and decrease the mitochondrial membrane potential of leukemia MV4-11 cells. The obtained results proved that the strategy of the incorporation of cinnamic and 3-methoxycinnamic acids into phospholipids could expand their potential application in industry, as well as could improve their antiproliferative activity and selectivity toward cancer cell lines.
In the search for molecules that are non-toxic for humans and that have the potential to suppress tumor development and counteract cancers already developed, we became interested in cinnamic acid (CA) (1a) and its methoxy derivatives. These compounds have been known for centuries in treatments for cancer. The first mention of this subject came from 1905 and indicated that a 10% sodium cinnamate solution was a substance that could support anticancer therapy.1 Liu and co-workers proved that cinnamic acid has a cytostatic effect on human glioblastoma cells (A175, U251), melanoma (MEL 1011, A375(M), SKMEL 28), prostate cancer (PC3(M), Du145, LNCaP), and lung cancer (A549) at doses that have no significant effect on normal cells.2 The anticancer activity of CA (1a) has been reported to be a result of its inhibitory effect on 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 5 (AKR1C3), which indicated a potential use of this compound in the treatment of hormone-dependent forms of cancers.3 CA (1a) causes the cell cycle arrest of human cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa), malignant melanoma (Fem-x), and breast cancer (MCF-7) and induces apoptosis of human melanoma cells (HT-144).4 In studies of the mechanism of CA action on human leukemia cells (K562) it has been confirmed that this compound promotes cell cycle arrest by prolonging the G1/G0 phase and inducing cell apoptosis.5
Methoxy derivatives of cinnamic acid suppress benzo(a)pyrene-induced neoplasia of the forestomach and inhibit invasion and metastasis in the melanoma cell lines.6,7 In other studies, they turned out to be effective chemopreventive agents against 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in an in vivo model, which indicated their possible application in the prevention of colon carcinogenesis.8 For methoxy derivatives of cinnamic acid, induction of an intrinsic apoptosis pathway (dependent on mitochondria) in the human colon cancer cell line (HTC-116) has also been confirmed.9
Cinnamic acid (1a) and its methoxy derivatives are also known to exert a number of other beneficial effects. Among these, antimicrobial,10,11 hepatoprotective,12 and antidiabetic13,14 activities, as well as a protective effect against glutamate-induce neurodegeneration in cortical neurons, which should be especially emphasized.15
Despite extensive literature data indicating the biological activities of cinnamic acid and its methoxy derivatives, it is difficult to achieve in practice an anticancer and pro-health impact of these compounds on the body. The biological effects of aromatic acids delivery to the organisms from natural sources depend not only on their chemical form but also on the level of their release from the food matrix via gut microbes. It has been also confirmed that even when they are supplied in the free form to the organism, their bioavailability is still very low, because of their fast metabolism and elimination in both urine and bile after ingestion. Therefore, their effects that have been proved in in vitro studies are difficult to achieve in in vivo experiments. For this reason, in the food and pharmaceutical industries, the products of the lipophilization of aromatic acids are used. One of the most effective strategies to enhance their bioavailability in biological systems is through covalent bounding with phospholipids (PLs). Only a few papers concerning aromatic acids attached to PLs have been published so far. Yang and co-workers incorporated ferulic acid into the structure of phosphatidylcholine using lipase Novozym 435.16 In another study, phospholipids derivatives of syringic and vanillic acids obtained by chemical synthesis were introduced as new food-based ingredients with potential application in the food industry.17
Recently, we described phospholipid conjugates of methoxy derivatives of benzoic acid as potential anticancer chemotherapeutics.18 Herein, we report the synthesis of phosphatidylcholines containing in their structures cinnamic acid (CA) (1a) and 3-methoxycinnamic acid (3-OMe–CA) (1b), which are known to be even more active antitumor agents than the methoxy derivatives of benzoic acid, like anisic or veratric acids.
![]() | ||
| Scheme 1 Synthesis of symmetrically substituted phosphocholines (3a-b) containing the CA and 3-OMe–CA residues. | ||
![]() | ||
| Scheme 2 Synthesis of asymmetrically substituted phosphatidylcholines containing CA or 3-OMe–CA in the sn-2 position (5a-b). | ||
![]() | ||
| Scheme 3 Synthesis of asymmetrically substituted phosphatidylcholines containing CA or 3-OMe–CA in the sn-1 position (10a-b). | ||
Two asymmetrically substituted phosphatidylcholines containing CA or 3-OMe–CA at the sn-2 position (5a-b) were obtained according to the reaction presented in Scheme 2. The starting lysophosphatidylcholine (PA-LPC) 4 was synthesized using phospholipase A2 (PLA2), as was described previously19 and was then subjected to esterification with 1a and 1b in the presence of DMAP and DCC. After purification, we received products 5a in a 90% yield and 5b in a 58% yield. The formation of 5a-b was confirmed by the ESI-MS spectra, in which intensive signals at m/z 626.3824 for 5a and 656.3925 for 5b were detected. To determine their structures, 1D and 2D NMR experiments were performed (all data are presented in the Experimental section and all the spectra are in the ESI†). In the NMR spectra of 5a-b, all characteristic signals from the glycerol, choline, aromatic acid, and palmitic acid were identified. In the 1H NMR spectra of 5a and 5b, signals from protons of the benzene ring (6.72–7.31 ppm) and olefinic protons (δ = 6.23 and 7.47 for 5a and 6.20 and 7.42 ppm for 5b) were visible. The terminal methyl signal of palmitoyl residue at the sn-1 position was observed at δ = 0.64 (5a) and 0.62 (5b) as a triplet (J = 6.8 Hz), whereas the signals for methylene groups in the palmitic acid residue were observed in the range 0.95–1.09 ppm. The chemical shift of the multiplet of H-2′ at 5.12 ppm in the spectra of 5a and 5b proved that the sn-2 position was esterified and PA-LPC was conjugated with aromatic acids. In the 13C NMR spectra of 5a and 5b, two carbon atom signals from ester groups were identified at δ = 166.13 and 173.63 for phosphocholine 5a and at δ = 166.26 and 173.75 for compound 5b. Signals of C-2 and C-3 carbon atoms were observed at 116.74 and 145.60 ppm for 5a and at 116.88 and 145.72 ppm for 5b. The 31P NMR data confirmed the presence of a phosphocholine 5a and 5b as a singlet at −0.66 and −4.64 ppm, respectively.
For the preparation of lyso PC 9a-b, containing the CA and 3-OMe–CA in the sn-1 position, GPC was regioselectively acylated using a tin-mediated mono-functionalization method described by D'Arrigo previously.19 First, the stanylene acetal 7 was prepared in the reaction of sn-glycerophosphocholine 6 with dibutyltin oxide (DBTO) and then subjected to acylation by cinnamoyl and 3-methoxycinnamoyl chlorides 8a-b obtained in situ, according to the method proposed by Mattson.20 Lysophosphocholines 9a-b were obtained in good yields of 67% and 69%, respectively. In the 1H NMR spectra of 9a-b, the characteristic for the –N+(CH3)3 group single peak at 3.01 ppm was detected. The multiplets of protons H-2′ in the range 3.73–3.85 ppm proved that the sn-2 position was non-esterified. The peaks from protons of the aromatic ring appeared in the range 6.83–7.31 ppm and confirmed the conjugation of CA and 3-OMe–CA with GPC. The structures of products 9a-b were fully confirmed also by the 13C, 31P, correlation spectroscopy and ESI-MS spectra as well.
The heterosubstituted phospholipids 10a-b, in which CA and 3-OMe–CA occur in the sn-2 position and the sn-1 position is occupied by the palmitic acid, were synthesized from 9a-b. These lyso PCs were subjected to Steglich esterification with palmitic acid. Phosphocholines 10a-b were obtained in high yields of 90% and 85.5%, respectively. The 1H NMR spectra of 10a-b displayed all the proton signals from CA/3-OMe–CA acid and GPC, such as signals for the hydrogen protons in aromatic rings at 6.72–7.36 ppm and the –N+(CH3)3 group at 2.98–3.01 ppm of the GPC fragment. The appearance of new peaks in the range 0.63–2.15 ppm confirmed successfully the incorporation of palmitic acid into the structure of the lyso PC used as a substrate. The 1H NMR spectra of 10a and 10b showed a multiplet of proton H-2′ at δ = 5.10 and 5.07, respectively. In comparison to the lysophosphatidylcholines 9a-b, the chemical shifts of these signals were shifted to a lower frequency, which proved that the sn-2 position was esterified. The structural assignments were also accomplished through extensive 2D NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectra (ESI-MS).
| Compound | Acyl residue | Cell lines IC50 [μM] | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sn-1 | sn-2 | MV4-11 | A-549 | MCF-7 | LoVo | LoVo/DX | HepG2 | BALB/3T3 | |
| a IC50 – compound concentration leading to 50% inhibition of cell proliferation. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) calculated using Prolab-3 system based on Cheburator 0.4 software.21 Statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA version 10 (StatSoft Inc., USA). t-test was used in the analysis.b Results within column that are significantly different in comparison to CA or 3-OMe–CA, respectively; p < 0.05. | |||||||||
| 1a | — | — | 358.7 ± 104.6 | >625 | 480.3 ± 46.2 | 283.6 ± 26.6 | >625 | >625 | >625 |
| 3a | CA | CA | 214.9 ± 51.9 | >625 | 320.7 ± 11.1b | 199.9 ± 49.7 | 329.2 ± 12.5 | >625 | >625 |
| 5a | PA | CA | 43.2 ± 9.9b | 56.3 ± 0.4 | 64.6 ± 3.4b | 52.3 ± 5b | 56.3 ± 0.8 | 227.6 ± 30.6 | 113.7 ± 36.6 |
| 9a | CA | — | 44.3 ± 5.1b | 287.1 ± 2 | 104.1 ± 4.4b | 111.8 ± 26.3b | 238.2 ± 2.3 | 289.7 ± 19.4 | 160 ± 45.7 |
| 10a | CA | PA | 88.7 ± 28.9b | 61.9 ± 3.7 | 126.9 ± 28.3b | 63 ± 14.4b | 66 ± 8.7 | 283.4 ± 5.2 | 207.6 ± 30.7 |
| 1b | — | — | 338.7 ± 111.0 | >625 | 420.2 ± 56.2 | 232.7 ± 15.5 | >625 | >625 | 506 ± 67.7 |
| 3b | 3-OMe–CA | 3-OMe–CA | 165.3 ± 25.4 | 286.1 ± 5.3 | 307.3 ± 12.5b | 209.9 ± 22.2 | 32.1 ± 16.9 | 83.6 ± 45.1 | 297.1 ± 56.4b |
| 5b | PA | 3-OMe–CA | 83.2 ± 4.0b | 192.6 ± 27.4 | 224.2 ± 9.5b | 70.4 ± 5.4b | 69.9 ± 6.3 | 294.8 ± 11.4 | 257.4 ± 52.4b |
| 9b | 3-OMe–CA | — | 30.5 ± 8.2b | 258.6 ± 16.7 | 84.1 ± 7.4b | 85.1 ± 11.9b | 160 ± 61.7 | 272.3 ± 33.1 | 154.3 ± 66.4b |
| 10b | 3-OMe–CA | PA | 235.9 ± 46.3 | 280.4 ± 8.8 | 214.1 ± 89.6 | 211.6 ± 1.3 | 254.5 ± 11.6 | 296.5 ± 13.2 | 291.3 ± 5.6b |
| Cisplatin | 1.3 ± 0.47 | 8.6 ± 0.7 | 8.1 ± 0.03 | 2.56 ± 0.4 | 3.17 ± 0.2 | 2.38 ± 0.64 | 4.2 ± 1.1 | ||
| Doxorubicin | — | — | 0.117 ± 0.012 | 6.53 ± 0.93 | — | — | |||
A comparison of the activities of phospholipid derivatives of CA and 3-OMe–CA showed that homosubstituted PC with 3-OMe–CA 3b was a little more active than homosubstituted PC with CA 3a. Moreover, for heterosubstituted PC with CA 5a and 10a and heterosubstituted PC with 3-OMe–CA 5b and 10b, the opposite correlations were observed. Phosphatidylcholines 5a and 10a were significantly more active than 5b and 10b.
The results of the antiproliferative activity of the previously reported phosphatidylcholines containing anisic/veratric acids18 and those with cinnamic/3-methoxycinnamic acids presented here confirmed that some carcinoma cell lines, such as MV4-11, MCF-7, and LoVo, seemed to be more sensitive to the studied conjugates than the other ones, like HepG2. Based on our results, it can be concluded that phospholipids with O-methylated derivatives of benzoic acid are more active in the form of 1-acyl-LPC than phosphatidylcholines with CA and 3-OMe–CA residues mainly in the form of heterosubstituted PC. However, it was difficult to determine the impact of the presence and the position of methoxy group in the benzene ring on the activity of the novel phospholipids. For this purpose, more PC derivatives should be synthesized and tested.
The phospholipid derivatives of cinnamic and 3-methoxycinnamic acids had also high antiproliferative activity against the doxorubicin-resistant LoVo/DX cell line. Resistance index (RI) values were calculated and the data are presented in Table 2. All of the obtained phosphatidylcholines were able to overcome drug resistance, especially 3b, and only 9a had a moderate ability to overcome drug resistance.
| Compound | Acyl residue | RI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sn-1 | sn-2 | ||
| 1a | — | — | — |
| 3a | CA | CA | 1.65 |
| 5a | PA | CA | 1.08 |
| 9a | CA | — | 2.13 |
| 10a | CA | PA | 1.05 |
| 1b | — | — | — |
| 3b | 3-OMe–CA | 3-OMe–CA | 0.15 |
| 5b | PA | 3-OMe–CA | 0.99 |
| 9b | 3-OMe–CA | — | 1.88 |
| 10b | 3-OMe–CA | PA | 1.2 |
| DOX | — | — | 55.81 |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Cell cycle analysis of MV4-11 cells after treatment of 1-palmitoyl-2-cinnamoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (5a; 50 μM); *p < 0.05 in comparison to control cells, t-test, Statistica v.10. | ||
This compound arrested cell cycle in the G2/M phase (which was statistically significant in comparison to the control cells, p < 0.05) and lowered the percentage of cells in G0/G1 and S phase (which was statistically not significant in comparison to the control cells).
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) of MV4-11 cells after treatment of 1-palmitoyl-2-cinnamoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (5a; 50 μM). | ||
Compound 5a was used in a concentration about its IC50 in all types of analyses: cell cycle distribution, mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis. Based on these results, we can observe that compound 5a was able to arrest cell cycle in the G2/M phase, leading to a decrease in the subpopulation in the S and G0/G1 phases and was able to decrease mitochondrial potential, but did not induce apoptosis. The blockage of the cells exposed to 5a at G2/M implied an inhibition of mitosis and resulted in cell proliferation inhibition. The lack of apoptosis or necrosis induction may suggest that compound 5a acted rather as a cytostatic agent. On the other hand, the decreased Ψm may suggest a mitochondrial autophagy.22,23 However, further studies are needed to explore the exact mechanisms of action of the tested compound.
000 LEU per mL) was a gift from Novozymes.
:
25
:
4, v/v/v). Analytical TLC was performed on Merck Kieselgel 60 F254 plates (0.2 mm silica gel with a fluorescent indicator UV254) with mixtures of CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O (65
:
25
:
4, v/v/v) as the developing system. Products were detected by spraying the plates with a solution of 10 g of Ce(SO4)2 and 20 g of phosphoromolibdenic acid in 1 L of 10% H2SO4 followed by heating or 0.05% primuline solution acetone/H2O (8
:
2, v/v) followed by UV (365 nm) visualization. All the NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker Avance II 600 MHz spectrometer (Brüker, Billerica, MA, USA). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained using an electron spray ionization (ESI) technique on a Waters ESI-Q-TOF Premier XE spectrometer.
:
25
:
4, v/v/v)).
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 2.96 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.37 (m, 2H, CH2-β), 3.90 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H, CH2-3′), 4.03 (m, 2H, CH2-α), 4.17 (dd, J = 12.0, 6.6 Hz, 1H, one of CH2-1′), 4.31 (dd, J = 12.0, 3.4 Hz, 1H, one of CH2-1′), 5.18 (m, 1H, H-2′), 6.22 (two d, J = 15.8 Hz, 2H, H-2sn-1, H-2sn-2), 7.11–7.13 (m, 6H, H-3′′sn-1, H-4′′sn-1, H-5′′sn-1, H-3′′sn-2, H-4′′sn-2, H-5′′sn-2), 7.28–7.29 (m, 4H, H-2′′sn-1, H-6′′sn-1, H-2′′sn-2, H-6′′sn-2), 7.45 (two d, J = 15.8 Hz, 2H, H-3sn-1, H-3sn-2); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 53.48, 53.51, 53.53 (–N(CH3)3), 58.75 (C-α), 62.34 (C-1′), 63.38 (C-3′), 65.90 (C-β), 70.34 (C-2′), 116.56, 116.69 (C-2sn-1, C-2sn-2), 127.68, 127.69 (C-2′′sn-1, C-6′′sn-1, C-2′′sn-2, C-6′′sn-2), 128.41, 128.46 (C-3′′sn-1, C-5′′sn-1, C-3′′sn-2, C-5′′sn-2), 130.13, 130.21 (C-4′′sn-1, C-4′′sn-2), 133.56, 133.59 (C-1′′sn-1, C-1′′sn-2), 145.46, 145.64 (C-3sn-1, C-3sn-2), 166.17, 166.56 (C-1sn-1, C-1sn-2); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −0.76; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C26H32NO8P [M + H]+ 518.1944; found 518.1945.
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 2.99 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.43 (t, 2H, CH2-β), 3.56, 3.57 (two s, 6H, 2× –OCH3), 3.91 (m, 2H, CH2-3′), 4.08 (m, 2H, CH2-α), 4.19 (m, 1H, one of CH2-1′), 4.33 (m, 1H, one of CH2-1′), 5.21 (m, 1H, H-2′), 6.21 (two d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H, H-2sn-1, H-2sn-2), 6.69–6.71 (m, 2H, H-4′′sn-1, H-4′′sn-2), 6.78–6.85 (m, 2H, H-2′′sn-1, H-2′′sn-2), 6.86–6.89 (m, 2H, H-6′′sn-1, H-6′′sn-2), 7.02–7.06 (m, 2H, H-5′′sn-1, H-5′′sn-2), 7.41 (two d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H, H-3sn-1, H-3sn-2); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 53.46 (–N(CH3)3), 54.57, 54.58 (2× –OCH3), 58.81 (C-α), 62.45 (C-1′), 63.41 (C-3′), 65.84 (C-β), 70.44 (C-2′), 112.61, 112.72 (C-2′′sn-1, C-2′′sn-2), 115.90, (C-4′′sn-1, C-4′′sn-2), 116.80, 116.91 (C-2sn-1, C-2sn-2), 120.35 (C-6′′sn-1, C-6′′sn-2), 129.40, 129.47 (C-5′′sn-1, C-5′′sn-2), 134.84, 134.89 (C-1′′sn-1, C-1′′sn-2), 145.39, 145.64 (C-3sn-1, C-3sn-2), 159.46, 159.50 (C-3′′sn-1, C-3′′sn-2), 166.17, 166.52 (C-1sn-1, C-1sn-2); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −3.44; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C28H36NO10P [M + H]+ 578.2155; found 578.2156.
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 0.64 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 0.97–1.05 (m, 24H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 1.35 (m, 2H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 2.09 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 2.97 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.37 (m, 2H, CH2-β), 3.85 (m, 2H, CH2-3′), 4.02–4.07 (m, 3H, CH2-α, one of CH2-1), 4.13 (m, 1H, one of CH2-1′), 5.12 (m, 1H, H-2′), 6.23 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2), 7.17 (m, 3H, H-3′′, H-4′′, H-5′′), 7.31 (m, 2H, H-2′′, H-6′′), 7.47 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 13.40 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 22.17 (CH3CH2(CH2)12CH2C(O)), 24.42 (CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 28.63, 28.74, 28.81, 28.86, 28.99, 29.01, 29.13, 29.15, 29.17, 29.19, 31.44 (CH3CH2(CH2)11CH2CH2C(O)), 33.62 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 53.56, 53.59, 53.61 (–N(CH3)3), 58.75 (C-α), 62.16 (C-1′), 63.51 (C-3′), 65.96 (C-β), 70.34 (C-2′), 116.74 (C-2), 127.73 (C-2′′, C-6′′), 128.50, 128.53 (C-3′′, C-5′′), 130.28 (C-4′′), 133.62 (C-1′′), 145.60 (C-3), 166.13 (C-1), 173.63 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −0.66; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C33H56NO8P [M + H]+ 626.3822; found 626.3824.
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 0.62 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 0.95–1.09 (m, 24H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 1.33 (m, 2H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 2.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 2.96 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.39 (m, 2H, CH2-β), 3.58 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.81 (m, 2H, CH2-3′), 4.01–4.04 (m, 3H, CH2-α, one of CH2-1′), 4.17 (m, 2H, one of CH2-1′), 5.12 (m, 1H, H-2′), 6.20 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, H-2), 6.72 (m, 1H, H-4′′), 6.83 (m, 1H, H-2′′), 6.90 (m, 1H, H-6′′), 7.07 (m, 1H, H-5′′), 7.42 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 13.35 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 22.13 (CH3CH2(CH2)12CH2C(O)), 24.38 (CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 28.61, 28.80, 28.82, 28.96, 29.11, 29.14, 31.40 (CH3CH2(CH2)11CH2CH2C(O)), 33.58 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 53.49 (–N(CH3)3), 54.69 (–OCH3), 58.86 (C-α), 62.24 (C-1′), 63.47 (C-3′), 65.83 (C-β), 70.44 (C-2′), 112.80 (C-2′′), 116.00 (C-4′′), 116.88 (C-2), 120.40 (C-6′′), 129.55 (C-5′′), 134.88 (C-1′′), 145.72 (C-3), 159.56 (C-3′′), 166.26 (C-1), 173.75 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −4.64; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C34H58NO9P [M + H]+ 656.3928; found 656.3925.
:
25
:
4, v/v/v)).
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 3.01 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.44 (m, 2H, CH2-β), 3.73–3.79 (two m, 3H, H-2′, CH2-3′), 3.85 (m, 1H, –OH), 4.00–4.10 (two m, 4H, CH2-α, CH2-1′), 6.25 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2), 7.16 (m, 3H, H-3′′, H-4′′, H-5′′), 7.31 (m, 2H, H-2′′, H-6′′), 7.48 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 53.57, 53.60, 53.62 (–N(CH3)3), 58.97 (C-α), 64.72 (C-1′), 65.88 (C-β), 66.60 (C-3′), 68.17 (C-2′), 116.85 (C-2), 127.68, (C-2′′, C-6′′), 128.50, 128.53 (C-3′′, C-5′′), 130.16 (C-4′′), 133.72 (C-1′′), 145.27 (C-3), 16.91 (C-1); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −1.26; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C17H26NO7P [M + H]+ 388.1525; found 388.1526.
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 3.01 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.49 (m, 2H, CH2-β), 3.58 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.77–3.85 (m, 3H, H-2′, CH2-3′, –OH), 4.00–4.12 (m, 4H, CH2-1′, CH2-α), 6.23 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H, H-2), 6.71 (m, 1H, H-4′′), 6.83 (m, 1H, H-2′′), 6.90 (m, 1H, H-6′′), 7.06 (m, 1H, H-5′′), 7.44 (d, J = 16 Hz, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 53.61 (–N(CH3)3), 54.71 (–OCH3), 59.21 (C-α), 64.73 (C-1′), 65.78 (C-β), 66.53 (C-3′), 68.04 (C-2′), 112.76 (C-2′′), 115.84 (C-4′′), 117.04 (C-2), 120.35 (C-6′′), 129.52 (C-5′′), 135.01 (C-1′′), 145.29 (C-3), 159.51 (C-3′′), 166.94 (C-1); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −1.26; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C18H28NO8P [M + H]+ 418.1631; found 418.1640.
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 0.66 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 0.99–1.08 (m, 24H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 1.39 (m, 2H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 2.13–2.15 (m, 2H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 3.01 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.43 (m, 2H, CH2-β), 3.82 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H, CH2-3′), 4.06 (m, 2H, CH2-α), 4.12 (dd, J = 12.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H, one of CH2-1′), 4.27 (dd, J = 12.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H, one of CH2-1′), 5.10 (m, 1H, H-2′), 6.25 (m, 1H, H-2), 7.19–7.20 (m, 3H, H-3′′, H-4′′, H-5′′), 7.33–7.36 (m, 2H, H-2′′, H-6′′), 7.48 (m, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 13.45 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 22.20 (CH3CH2(CH2)12CH2C(O)), 24.51 (CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 28.66, 28.70, 28.86, 28.89, 28.90, 29.02, 29.06, 29.18, 29.21, 31.46 (CH3CH2(CH2)11CH2CH2C(O)), 33.81 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 53.58 (–N(CH3)3), 58.91 (C-α), 62.49 (C-1′), 63.36 (C-3′), 65.88 (C-β), 70.05 (C-2′), 116.51 (C-2), 127.78 (C-2′′, C-6′′), 128.54 (C-3′′, C-5′′), 130.32 (C-4′′), 133.60 (C-1′′), 145.67 (C-3), 166.71 (C-1), 173.54 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −4.2; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C33H56NO8P [M + H]+ 626.3822; found 626.3824.
:
1 (v/v)), δ: 0.63 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 0.96–1.01 (m, 24H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 1.35–1.38 (m, 2H, CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 2.09–2.12 (m, 2H, CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 2.98 (s, 9H, –N(CH3)3), 3.39 (m, 2H, CH2-β), 3.60 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.79 (t, J = 6,5 Hz, 2H, CH2-3′), 4.03 (m, 2H, CH2-α), 4.08–4.11 (m, 2H, CH2-1′), 5.07 (m, 1H, H-2′), 6.18–6.21 (m, 1H, H-2), 6.72–6.73 (m, 1H, H-4′′), 6.83 (m, 1H, H-2′′), 6.89–6.90 (m, 1H, H-6′′), 7.08 (m, 1H, H-5′′), 7.39–7.42 (m, 1H, H-3); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: 13.38 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 22.15 (CH3CH2(CH2)12CH2C(O)), 24.47 (CH3(CH2)12CH2CH2C(O)), 28.61, 28.81, 28.84, 28.98, 29.01, 29.14, 29.16, 31.42 (CH3CH2(CH2)11CH2CH2C(O)), 33.76 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)), 53.50, 53.53, 53.55 (–N(CH3)3), 54.73 (OCH3), 58.85 (C-α), 62.46 (C-1′), 63.31 (C-3′), 65.87 (C-β), 70.03 (C-2′), 112.76 (C-2′′), 116.80 (C-4′′), 120.43 (C-6′′), 129.54 (C-5′′), 134.94 (C-1′′), 145.51 (C-3), 166.61 (C-1), 173.48 (CH3(CH2)13CH2C(O)); 31P NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 2
:
1 (v/v)) δ: −3.18; HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C34H58NO9P [M + H]+ 656.3928; found 656.3918.
Twenty-four hours before addition of the tested compounds, the cells were plated in 96-well plates (Sarstedt, USA) at a density of 104 cells per well. All cell lines were exposed to each tested phosphatidylcholines for 72 h. Cells were also exposed to the commercially available drugs cisplatin and doxorubicin. Cell lines were also exposed to the solvent used for the tested compounds (DMSO) at concentrations corresponding to those present in the tested agents' dilutions. For adherent cells, a SRB assay was performed and an MTT assay was performed for leukaemia cells.
The results of the cytotoxic activity in vitro were expressed as IC50—the concentration of compound (in μM) that inhibits the proliferation rate of the tumor cells by 50% as compared to control untreated cells.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Spectroscopic data. See DOI: 10.1039/c8ra07002d |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 |