Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Synthesis of hyperbranched polyglycerols using ascorbic acid as an activator

Mehdi Dadkhaha, Hamidreza Shamlooeia, Ehsan Mohammadifarb and Mohsen Adeli*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. E-mail: mohadeli@yahoo.com
bSchool of Chemistry, University College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Received 28th November 2017 , Accepted 13th December 2017

First published on 19th December 2017


Abstract

In this work, low molecular weight hyperbranched polyglycerols (LMPGs) are synthesized in bulk using ascorbic acid as an activator. Different molar ratios of glycidol and ascorbic acid were mixed and stirred at ambient conditions and LMPGs with different molecular weights, degree of branching and relative abundance of the structural units were obtained. According to spectroscopy data, ascorbic acid was not incorporated in the structure of the polymer and plays the role of activating agent in the polymerization process. In this synthetic protocol, no other chemical reagents and organic solvents were used. Therefore, products are free of toxic impurities and suitable for future biomedical applications.


Introduction

Hyperbranched polyglycerols (hPGs), highly functional hydrophilic aliphatic polyether polyols, have been explored and developed as one of the most promising candidates for drug delivery and other biomedical purposes. Unique physicochemical and biological properties such as water solubility, multi-functionality which provides many potential sites for the conjugation of therapeutic agents and multivalent interactions, excellent biocompatibility, moderate thermal stability, oxidation resistance, no significant effects on the conjugates and low toxicity cause high interest for their usage in biological applications.1–4 Furthermore, because of their polyether structure and their similarity to PEG, hPGs are expected to show intrinsic ability to avoid mononuclear phagocytic system uptake.2,5 Also, the in vivo circulation half-lives of hPGs could be controlled by manipulation of their molecular weights.6,7 These advantages make the hPGs suitable alternatives to the conventional PEG for a broad range of biomedical applications.8–11 Since the first report on the synthesis of polyglycerol by Sandler et al. in 1966,12 different methods for the preparation of linear and hyperbranched analogues of this polymer, based on anionic and cationic ring opening polymerization of glycidol, have been established.3,13–19 However, a big challenge for the preparation of polyglycerols by conventional anionic and cationic ring opening polymerization is to use toxic initiators, catalysts and organic solvents.20–22 Traces of toxic agents in the final products induce adverse effects on the biological systems and hamper the biomedical applications of polyglycerols.23,24 Recently, polyglycerols with the defined structural parameters are synthesized by biocompatible initiators and in aqueous solutions.25,26 In these procedures, in addition to aqueous polymerization medium, nontoxic initiators reduce the health risk of the synthesized polyglycerols. Recently, in a collaborative work, we showed that citric acid is able to initiate the polymerization of glycidol and incorporate into the structure of products, leading to biocompatible and biodegradable polyglycerols.27 Herein, we show that ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is able to activate the polymerization of glycidol at ambient conditions. Structure of the obtained hyperbranched polyglycerols could be somehow tuned by manipulation the ratio of glycidol to ascorbic acid and reaction conditions.

Experimental

Glycidol (purity 96%) and ascorbic acid L (+) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and Merck, respectively. The dialysis membrane tubing (Biotech Cellulose Ester) (width: 31 mm, MWCO: 2 kDa) from spectrum Lab and Deionized water were used for purification of the synthesized compounds.

NMR spectra were recorded on a broker AMX 500 spectrometer and jeol ECP 500. Inverse gated 13C NMR was performed on Brucker avance 400 and Brucker avance 500 spectrometers. For internal calibration tetramethylsilane was used at 12 MHz with complete proton decoupling.

GPC measurements were achieved using an Agilent 1100 solvent delivery system with a manual injector, isopump and Agilent 1100 differential refractometer. The Brookhaven BIMWA7-angle light scattering detector was coupled to a size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to measure the molecular weight for each fraction of the polymer that was eluted from the SEC columns. For separation of the polymer samples, three 30 cm columns were used (10 μm PSS Suprema columns with pore sizes of 100 Å, 1000 Å, 3000 Å). Water was used as mobile phase; the flow rate was set at 1.0 mL min−1. All columns were held at room temperature. For each measurement, 100 μL of samples with concentration of 5 mg mL−1 solution was injected. For acquisition of data from seven scattering angles (detectors) and differential refractometer Win GPC Unity from PSS was used. Molecular weight distributions were determined by comparison with pullulan standards (10 different sizes from 342 to 710[thin space (1/6-em)]000 g mol−1). Water was used as solvent with 0.1 M NaNO3.

IR spectra were obtained with Nicolet AVATAR320FT-IR5SXC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a DTGS detector from 4000 to 650 cm−1. Sample measurement was done by dropping a solution of compound and letting the solvent evaporate for a few seconds.

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF) was measured with a Bruker Ultraflex TOF/TOF in the positive ion mode using a linear pathway (LP). Alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid was used as matrix. The samples were prepared via the “dried-droplet method” by dropping 0.5 μL of methanolic solution of the sample mixture and letting them dry in air. The mixture was prepared by mixing 100 μL of a 2 mg mL−1 solution of the sample, 100 μL of a saturated matrix solution, and 20 μL of a terephthalic acid sodium salt solution (TA).

Polymerization of glycidol

1.11 g (0.015 mol) glycidol and 0.88 g (0.005 mol) ascorbic acid were mixed in a polymerization ampule. Mixture was stirred under vacuum at different temperatures (40 °C and 70 °C) to produce polyglycerols with different structural parameters. Reaction was terminated, when products with high viscosity were formed and the magnet bar did not rotate anymore. This reaction is repeated for 1.85 g (0.025 mol) glycidol and 0.85 g (0.005 mol) ascorbic acid in temperature of 40 °C. Afterwards, ampule contents were dissolved in water and dialyzed against the same solvent for 24 h via dialysis tube with molecular weight cut off 2000 g mol−1. The purified products were obtained after drying in a vacuum oven at 40 °C and reduced pressure.

Results and discussion

In order to synthesis polyglycerols free from traces of toxic agents, ascorbic acid was used as an activator for cationic ring opening polymerization of glycidol at ambient conditions (Scheme 1).
image file: c7ra12861d-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism for the ring opening polymerization of glycidol by ascorbic acid.

Different molar ratios of glycidol to ascorbic acid (G/As) and two different reaction temperatures were chosen to investigate the effect of these parameters on the structure of products (Table 1). Polyglycerols synthesized by G/As = 3/1 molar ratio at 40 °C and 70 °C are abbreviated as hPG3/40 and hPG3/70, respectively. Also polyglycerol synthesized by G/As = 5/1 molar ratio at 40 °C is abbreviated as hPG5/40. In the IR spectra, absorbance bands at 3300 cm−1, 2891 cm−1 and 1100 cm−1 are corresponded to the hydroxyl, aliphatic C–H and C–O bonds of polyglycerols (Fig. 1). In 1H NMR spectra, signals at 3.3–4.2 ppm are assigned to the protons of hPGs (Fig. 2) due to the fact that both IR and 1H NMR spectra do not show absorbance bands and signals of ascorbic acid, this compound plays only the role of activating agent and it is not incorporated in the structure of polyglycerols.

Table 1 Degree of branching, molecular weight, reactions time, chemical shift and relative abundance of the linear, terminal, and dendritic units of the hPGs synthesized by different G/As molar ratios at different temperatures
Structural units Shift (ppm) hPG3/70 hPG5/40 hPG3/40
L1,3 60.4–61.1 0.70 0.65 0.59
2T2 61.1–61.7 0.30 0.32 0.41
T1 62.4–63 0.49 0.46 0.36
L1,4, L1,3 68.6–69.9 1.13 1.08 1.13
2D, 2T 70–71.6 2.47 2.27 1.63
2L1,4 71.8–72.8 1.35 1.48 1.12
D 77.7–78.9 0.57 0.53 0.65
L1,3 79.3–80 0.38 0.47 0.41
T2 81–81.5 0.13 0.12 0.22
Reaction time (h)   3 16 16
Degree of branching   0.45 0.43 0.53
Linear 1, 3 units (%)   28 26 27
Linear 1, 4 units (%)   27 30 26
Dendritic units (%)   23 21 30
Terminal units (%)   22 23 17
Mn (GPC) (g mol−1)   2516 2256 2138
Mw (GPC) (g mol−1)   4417 3942 3334
PDI   1.75 1.75 1.56



image file: c7ra12861d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 IR spectra of the synthesized polyglycerols. (i, ii and iii) Spectra's are belong to hPG3/40 and hPG3/70 and hPG5/40, respectively.

image file: c7ra12861d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 1H NMR spectra of hPGs. (i, ii and iii) Spectra's are belong to hPG3/40 and hPG3/70 and hPG5/40, respectively.

Mechanism of polymerization and the effect of G/As molar ratio as well as reaction temperature on the structure of the synthesized polymers was investigated by inverse gated 13C NMR (Fig. 3). According to these spectra and using equation presented by Frey et al.13,26 relative abundance of structural unites as well as degree of branching (DB) of hPGs were determined (Table 1). In comparison to the anionic ring opening polymerizations, DB of polymers is in the range of 0.44–0.53. However, it is higher than the reported DB for the cationic ring opening polymerization of glycidol.23,24 This is due to the higher relative abundance of L1,4 structural unites (Table 1). Moreover, the relative abundance of the dendritic blocks (D%) and therefore DB of hPGs depend on the G/As molar ratios and temperature, inversely.


image file: c7ra12861d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Assignment of structural units of synthesized hPGs by different G/As ratios at 40 °C and 70 °C in the inverse gated 13C NMR spectra.

Inverse gated 13C NMR spectra of the synthesized polyglycerols show that polymers are containing L1,4 units in addition to L1,3 units (Fig. 3 and Table 1).

It is known that activated chain end (ACE) mechanism results in the L1,3 units, exclusively. Therefore, presence of L1,4 units in the structure of the synthesized hPGs confirm that glycidol is polymerized by ascorbic acid through the activated monomer (AM) mechanism.16,23,27 Accordingly, the proposed mechanism for the polymerization of glycidol by ascorbic acid is as below:

(i) Protonation of glycidol.

(ii) Polymerization of protonated monomers by glycidol.

Different groups in the structure of polyglycerol were characterized by DEPT – 13CNMR (Fig. 4). Clearly, all well-known signals for polyglycerols are appeared in this spectra. According to gel permeation chromatography (GPC) the synthesized polyglycerols showed molecular weights in the range of 2138–2516 g mol−1. It was found that increasing the temperature of polymerization increase the molecular weight of the synthesized polyglycerols, while G/As molar ratio do not affect it significantly (Table 1).


image file: c7ra12861d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) Inverse gated 13C NMR of hPG3/70 and (b) 13C DEPT spectrum of hPG3/70.

MALDI-TOF MS spectrometry show that the molecular mass of the synthesized polymers is a multiple of 74 which is molecular mass of glycidol. In other words the mass distribution of the hPGs follow out 74n, where n is the number of repeating units in polymer molecule (Fig. 6–8). The other mass distribution is due to hydrated polymer as it has 18 units (mw of H2O) difference with the main polymer mass.


image file: c7ra12861d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 GPC diagrams of hPGs.

image file: c7ra12861d-f6.tif
Fig. 6 MALDI-TOF mass spectra of hPG3/40.

image file: c7ra12861d-f7.tif
Fig. 7 MALDI-TOF mass spectra of hPG3/70.

image file: c7ra12861d-f8.tif
Fig. 8 MALDI-TOF mass spectra of hPG5/40.

This result show that ascorbic acid is not incorporated in the structure of the synthesized polyglycerols.

Polydispersity index (PDI) of the synthesized polymers was specified by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (Fig. 5). It was found that PDI amounts are depended on the G/As molar ratios. The greater amount of molar ratio and upper temperature resulted in the higher PDI (Table 1).

According to the data in Table 1, while changing the reaction temperature and molar ratio do not show a big effect on the relative abundance of linear units, they highly change that of dendritic units. At the same temperature the higher molar ratio of ascorbic acid would result in the higher degree of branching. Since the higher amount of ascorbic acid protonate the more glycidol monomers and the chance for ring opening reaction of both hydroxyl groups would increases and result in high DB.

Conclusions

In summary, a new method for the preparation of polyglycerols using ascorbic acid as a biocompatible compound is reported. In this method, cationic ring opening polymerization of glycidol by ascorbic acid through the activated monomer (AM) mechanism results in polyglycerols with the degree of branching in the range of 0.44–0.53. The synthesized polyglycerols by this method could be used for different biomedical applications, due to green synthesis procedure.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest between authors.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thanks Prof. Rainer Haag for his supports.

Notes and references

  1. A. Brändle and A. Khan, Polym. Chem., 2012, 3, 3224 RSC .
  2. Y. Deng, J. K. Saucier-Sawyer, C. J. Hoimes, J. Zhang, Y.-E. Seo, J. W. Andrejecsk and W. M. Saltzman, Biomaterials, 2014, 35, 6595 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  3. Z. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, Q. Tang, J. Xu, J. Wu, T. B. Kirk, D. Ma and W. Xue, Mater. Sci. Eng. Carbon, 2017, 71, 965 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  4. E. Mohammadifar, F. Daneshnia, M. Kehtari, A. N. Kharat and M. Adeli, Polym. Int., 2016, 65, 559 CrossRef CAS .
  5. N. Cengiz, J. Rao, A. Sanyal and A. Khan, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 11191 RSC .
  6. A. Saha, S. De, M. C. Stuparu and A. Khan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 134, 17291 CrossRef PubMed .
  7. M. Imran ul-haq, B. F. L. Lai, R. Chapanian and J. N. Kizhakkedathu, Biomaterials, 2012, 33, 9135 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  8. S. Gupta, R. Tyagi, V. S. Parmar, S. K. Sharma and R. Haag, Polymer, 2012, 53, 3053 CrossRef CAS .
  9. M. Calderón, M. A. Quadir, S. K. Sharma and R. Haag, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 190 CrossRef PubMed .
  10. A. L. Sisson and R. Haag, Soft Matter, 2010, 6, 4968 RSC .
  11. H.-Q. Wu and C.-C. Wang, Langmuir, 2016, 32, 6211 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  12. S. R. Sandler and F. R. Berg, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1966, 4, 1253 CAS .
  13. A. Thomas, S. S. Müller and H. Frey, Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15, 1935 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  14. S. Binder, I. Gadwal, A. Bielmann and A. Khan, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2014, 52, 2040 CrossRef CAS .
  15. S. Lee, D. H. Kim, D. H. Kang, B.-S. Kim, K. Saito, S. Sasaki, Y. Oishi and Y. Shibasaki, Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14, 2171 CrossRef PubMed .
  16. E. Mohammadifar, A. Nemati Kharat and M. Adeli, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2015, 3, 3896 RSC .
  17. A. Dworak, W. Walach and B. Trzebicka, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 1995, 196, 1963 CrossRef CAS .
  18. C. Schüll and H. Frey, ACS Macro Lett., 2012, 1, 461 CrossRef .
  19. D. Wilms, S.-E. Stiriba and H. Frey, Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43, 129 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  20. I. Gadwal, S. Binder, M. C. Stuparu and A. Khan, Macromolecules, 2014, 47, 5070 CrossRef CAS .
  21. A. Timothy Royappa, M. L. Vogt and V. Sharma, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2004, 91, 1344 CrossRef .
  22. T. V. Grinevich, N. G. Taganov, M. L. Pridatchenko and A. A. Berlin, Dokl. Chem., 2017, 472, 1 CrossRef CAS .
  23. K. Petrak, Bull. Mater. Sci., 1989, 12, 41 CrossRef CAS .
  24. K. Petrak, Drug Discovery Today, 2005, 10, 1667 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  25. B. R. Spears, M. A. Marin, J. R. Montenegro-Burke, B. C. Evans, J. McLean and E. Harth, Macromolecules, 2016, 49, 2022 CrossRef CAS .
  26. B. R. Spears, J. Waksal, C. McQuade, L. Lanier and E. Harth, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2394 RSC .
  27. E. Mohammadifar, A. Bodaghi, A. Dadkhahtehrani, A. Nemati Kharat, M. Adeli and R. Haag, ACS Macro Lett., 2017, 6, 35 CrossRef CAS .

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018