Multi-functionalization of lithographically designed gold nanodisks by plasmon-mediated reduction of aryl diazonium salts

I. Tijunelyte a, I. Kherbouche b, S. Gam-Derouich b, M. Nguyen c, N. Lidgi-Guigui a, M. Lamy de la Chapelle a, A. Lamouri b, G. Lévi b, J. Aubard b, A. Chevillot-Biraud b, C. Mangeney *bd and N. Felidj *b
aCSPBAT, UMR 7244, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 99 avenue Jean-baptiste Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse, France
bITODYS, UMR 7086, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonnne Paris Cité, 15 rue Jean Antoine de Baïf, 7013 Paris, France. E-mail:
cDepartment of Physical Chemistry, School of Chemical Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, 1 Dai Co Viet road, Hanoi, Vietnam
dUFR Biomédicale, UMR 8601 Université Paris Descartes Sorbonnne Paris Cité, 45 Rue des Saint Pères, 70005 Paris, France. E-mail:

Received 28th July 2017 , Accepted 25th September 2017

First published on 25th September 2017

Plasmon-driven surface functionalization of nanoparticles is receiving increasing attention as it allows locally tailored chemical reactivity to be generated on the nanoparticle surface. The extension to surface multi-functionalization still represents a major breakthrough in chemistry. We address this issue by triggering regiospecific surface double-functionalization under plasmon excitation, using diazonium salts as surface functionalization agents.

Plasmon-driven chemistry has stimulated great interest recently since plasmonic nanoparticles (NPs) have been shown to enhance chemical reactions on their surfaces when illuminated with light of particular frequencies.1 These reactions are driven by the excitation of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), resulting in a strong light extinction, a local field enhancement, heat generation, and hot-carrier transfer.1b Many examples of plasmon-driven photochemical reactions have been reported including the decomposition of organic molecules,2 the oxidative coupling of self-assembled p-aminothiophenol to produce p,p′-dimercaptoazobenzene,3 the dissociation of hydrogen molecules4 and the conversion of aldehydes to esters.8 Other examples describe the site-selective nanoscale-polymerization of SU8 photoresists on silver nanoparticles,5 pyrrole on gold nanoparticles6 or methacrylate derivatives in the inner mesopore walls of mesoporous silica films,7 all at room temperature. In the field of surface functionalization, a few examples have shown the outstanding perspectives offered by plasmonic NPs to trigger the grafting of organic layers in localized nanoareas. These examples include the photocleavage of self-assembled monolayers close to gold crescents9 or the nanoscale regio-selective surface chemistry on gold nanostripes10 and silver nanoantennas.11 Hot-electron generation was mentioned as the key element for driving reduction reactions. For instance, E. Cortés et al. highlighted a hot-electron reduction reaction of 4-nitrothiophenol on silver nanoantennas with high spatial resolution, with a reactivity depending on the electromagnetic field distribution within the metal.11a N. H. Kim et al. observed the reduction of aqueous tetrachloroplatinate ions to zerovalent Pt metal ions at the surfaces of single gold nanoparticles following the excitation of the localized surface plasmon. Thus the reduction and deposition of Pt were attributed to strong fields, occurring where strong hot electron tunneling currents flow.11b V.-Q. Nguyen et al. recently demonstrated the surface grafting of an organic layer (bisthienylbenzene molecules) triggered by LSP excitation, also attributed to hot electron generation.11c The ability to generate locally tailored chemical reactivity on the nanoparticle surface was further used to guide molecules,12 proteins13 or quantum dots14 to specific regions of the nanoparticle. However, the strategies developed so far provided a single functionalization of the surface with only one type of organic layer grafted in the nanoscale region. Extension of these strategies to the multi-functionalization of surfaces represents a major breakthrough in plasmon-mediated chemistry, in order to achieve the grafting of various chemical groups in distinct nanoscale regions.

We address this issue in the present paper by monitoring the incident light polarization on gold nanodisks to trigger plasmon excitation and obtain regiospecific local surface double-functionalization by diazonium salts (see Scheme 1). Lithographic gold nanodisks, with no capping agents on their surface, were chosen for the proof of concept, as they display a symmetric geometry in the XY plane and a uniform surface chemistry. By changing the polarization of the incident excitation light, the plasmon-driven functionalization of these isotropic NPs should result in a regioselective surface anisotropy. Functionalization agents based on aryl diazonium salts were selected as they were shown recently to graft on Au nanostripes through plasmon-induced electron transfer.10 These molecules present several advantages15 over self-assembled monolayers derived from thiol molecules: (i) they create strong covalent Au–C bonds with the surface, promoting stable interfacial links between the NPs and organic functional groups;16 (ii) they offer a wide range of terminal functional groups for future post-functionalization reactions. The thickness of the poly(phenylene) layers can be monitored from monolayers to multilayers up to a few tens of nanometers.10 In this work, two types of aryl diazonium salts were used, bearing either 4-(hydroxyethyl)benzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate or carboxyl-terminated groups (4-carboxybenzene diazonium tetrafluoroborate). The regioselective grafting of these two types of functional layers, under plasmon excitation, was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), extinction micro-spectroscopy and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Calculations based on the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) method were also performed to compare the spatial localization of the functional groups around the NPs with the electromagnetic field distribution. This plasmon-mediated multi-functionalization approach opens promising perspectives for the elaboration of nanostructured surfaces with chemical anisotropy.

image file: c7nh00113d-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Scheme of the regioselective multifunctionalization of gold nanodisks under plasmon excitation with polarized light. The nanostructures were first incubated for 180 s in an aqueous solution of carboxyphenyl diazonium salt (3 mM) under laser irradiation polarized in the Y direction. Then, the nanostructures were incubated for 180 s in an aqueous solution containing a hydroxyethyl phenyl diazonium salt (3 mM) under laser irradiation, polarized in the X direction.

Lithographic gold nanodisk arrays (with diameter D = 100 ± 5 nm, height H = 50 ± 5 nm, and interparticle distance Λ = 300 nm) were elaborated on indiumtin-oxide (ITO) coated-glass substrates by electron-beam lithography (EBL). The fabrication of the samples is detailed in the ESI. Representative SEM images and the optical response of the nanodisks are displayed in Fig. 1 and Fig. S1 (ESI). The main peak at 655 nm represents the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) dipolar mode in aqueous solution. Their functionalization by the aryl diazonium salts was first studied in the absence of any plasmon excitation or laser irradiation. After simple immersion of the plasmonic arrays in aqueous solutions of the diazonium salts at 3 mM for 1 h, spontaneous grafting of thin poly(aryl) layers all around the nanoparticles was observed. An estimation of the lateral profile of the disks from the SEM revealed that these layers are uniformly grafted all around the gold nanodisks, with an average thickness of ca. 2 nm. The SERS spectra, displayed in Fig. 2, confirmed the spontaneous grafting of the poly(aryl) layers, with the appearance of two main Raman bands in the range 500–2500 cm−1 (see assignments in Table S1, ESI).16

image file: c7nh00113d-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Characterization of the gold nanodisk array. (a) SEM image of the nano-array with disks of D = 100 nm in diameter after spontaneous grafting. (b) Extinction spectrum in water showing the LSPR of the nanodisks before functionalization.

image file: c7nh00113d-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a and b) SERS spectra of the poly(aryl) layers derived from carboxy- or hydoxyethyl-terminated diazonium salts on the gold nanodisk array after spontaneous grafting. The spontaneous grafting was performed in aqueous solution (c = 3 mM) of the diazonium salt for 1 h. The Raman spectra of the corresponding free diazonium salts are displayed below each SERS spectra for the sake of comparison.

The most characteristic bands are related to (i) the aromatic ring deformations in the spectral range of 1570–1591 cm−1 and (ii) the CH in-plane bending for mono- and para-substituted benzenes (coupled with the ring-N stretching mode) found in the range of 1075–1074 cm−1. It is noteworthy that the N[triple bond, length as m-dash]N band located around 2300 cm−1, clearly visible in the Raman spectra of the free diazonium salts, disappears upon grafting, confirming the release of N2 upon reduction of the corresponding diazonium salts.

Interestingly, the SERS spectra recorded in the range of 200–600 cm−1 (see Fig. S2, ESI) revealed the signature of interfacial Au–C bonds at 416 cm−1 (νAu–C). These results evidence the covalent grafting of the diazonium-derived layers on gold, as previously reported in the literature.16 In order to demonstrate that the LSPR excitation can locally trigger regiospecific surface functionalization, the gold nanodisk arrays were homogeneously immersed in the solution of carboxy-terminated diazonium salts (c = 3 mM) and illuminated by a laser polarized along the Y axis for 180 s. This very short reaction time was selected in order to limit, as far as possible, the spontaneous grafting of the poly(aryl) layers, which occurs all around the nanoparticles and prevents local resolution. The optical exposure was performed under normal incidence, and the He–Ne laser (λinc = 633 nm) was focused on the nano-array through a microscope objective (×10 numerical aperture N.A. #0.25), resulting in a circular laser spot of ∼5 μm diameter at the surface. The incident wavelength λinc = 633 nm of the laser excitation matches well with the LSPR of the gold nanodisk (λmax = 655 nm). It is worth mentioning that laser heating could induce the grafting reaction, probably through a cationic pathway, when the exposure energy dose exceeds a given threshold Dth, even in the absence of any plasmon excitation, as shown in a previous paper.10 In the case of thermal grafting, the layers are observed all around the nanoparticles, with a uniform distribution. Therefore, an exposure dose below this threshold value, corresponding to D = 50% Dth, was used here to avoid side reactions by laser heating and guarantees that the grafting of poly(aryl) layers on the nanostructures was solely induced by LSPR excitation. The plasmon-mediated grafting reaction was shown to induce a red-shift of the plasmon band due to an increase in the local refractive index, from λmax = 655 nm to 670 nm (see Fig. S3, ESI), revealing the deposition of the organic layers. The obtained hybrid nanostructures were characterized by SEM as the metallic NPs and the poly(aryl) layers show different contrasts (Fig. 3a and Fig. S4e, ESI). Polymer lobes can be visualized easily along the Y-axis in the vicinity of the nanodisks. It is worth mentioning that the grafting of the aryl films cannot be attributed to a photochemical reaction since the diazonium salts do not absorb in the visible spectral range.

image file: c7nh00113d-f3.tif
Fig. 3 SEM images of a single nanoparticle after plasmon-induced grafting of (a) carboxyphenyl layers along the Y direction and (c) additional hydroxyethyl phenyl layers along the X axis. Irradiation conditions: λinc = 633 nm, and 180 s with a power of P = 0.8 mW μm−2. Mapping of the near-field intensity enhancement |E|2 upon irradiation along the Y axis (b) and both X and Y axes (d), on a unit cell with a nanodisk of 100 nm diameter, H = 50 nm, using the DDA method.

In order to verify that plasmon-induced grafting occurs specifically in the regions of maximum field enhancement, the mapping of the intensity of the electric field around the nanodisks was calculated using the DDA method (see Fig. 3b). This shows a strong amplification on each side of the nanodisk along the excitation axis with a progressive attenuation away from the axis. From the comparison of the spatial extent of the grafted layers in the XY plane, observed by SEM, it is clear that the regioselective grafting of the poly(aryl) layers is a replica of the dipolar near-field intensity.

The extension of the poly(aryl) layers along the Z direction (perpendicular to the nanoarray plane) was studied by AFM. The differential AFM profiles of the lateral cross sections (corresponding to the subtraction of the profiles obtained before and after plasmon-induced grafting) revealed no grafting on top of the disk and confirmed the confinement of the grafted layers only in the XY plane, on each side of the nanodisks (see Fig. 4a). The SERS spectra, recorded after plasmon-induced grafting, looked very similar to those obtained after the spontaneous reaction apart from an enhancement of the shoulder at 1614 cm−1, at the higher frequency side of the aromatic orthometa C[double bond, length as m-dash]C bond vibration band (Fig. S3c and d, ESI). The main Raman band at 1586 cm−1 can be assigned to the aromatic ring deformations in the first layer grafted onto the gold surface, whereas the shoulder at 1614 cm−1 corresponds to the same vibration in the poly(aryl) layer as mentioned above, covalently linked to the former. The intensity increase of this shoulder thus confirms the polymeric nature of the grafted organic layer. Interestingly, strong variations of the SERS signal intensity were observed depending on the incident polarization. The spectra recorded in the Y direction, matching the polarization of plasmon-induced grafting, gave the highest SERS signal intensities. Nevertheless, the SERS signal is not fully switched off along the X direction, perpendicular to the polarization of plasmon-induced grafting. This is due to the spatial extension of the electromagnetic field enhancement away from the irradiation polarization axis leading to a poly(aryl) film, which is not strictly confined along the Y axis, but slightly spread out towards the X-axis (Fig. 3b).

image file: c7nh00113d-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) Plasmon-induced grafting of the first carboxy-aryl layer, using incident polarization along the Y axis. Top: AFM image of a single disk before (left) and after (right) plasmon-induced grafting along the Y axis. Bottom: Lateral cross-section profile along the Y axis after grafting (dashed line) and the differential lateral cross section along the Y axis (red line) revealing two main lobes along the Y direction and along the X direction (blue line) confirming no grafting along the X direction. (b) Plasmon-induced grafting of the second hydroxyethyl-aryl layer, using an incident polarization along the X axis. Top: AFM image of a single disk before grafting (left) and after double plasmon-induced grafting along the Y and X axes (right). Bottom: Lateral cross-section profile along the X axis after grafting (dashed line) and the differential lateral cross section along the Y axis (red curve) and the X axis (blue curve) revealing two main lobes along the Y and X directions.

In the second step, the samples were thoroughly cleaned with ethanol and dried before a new immersion in an aqueous solution of the other diazonium salt, hydroxyethyl benzenediazonium. A second exposure with the same energy dose but with incident polarization oriented along the X-axis was then performed. Fig. 3c shows the SEM image of the nanodisks after the second grafting step along the X-axis (see also Fig. S4f, ESI). New polymer nodules are observed on each side of the gold nanodisks along the X direction. On the basis of the SEM images recorded at both steps, it turns out that the two different poly(aryl) layers, bearing either carboxyl or hydroxyethyl substituents, were selectively integrated in different orientations around the gold nanodisks via near-field plasmonic excitation.

The AFM differential profile of the single disk before and after the two-step grafting (Fig. 4b) evidence the bi-directional anchoring of the poly(aryl) nanolayers, which perfectly matches the electric field distribution around the nanodisks, according to DDA calculations (Fig. 3d). Note that the corresponding optical and SERS spectra also confirm this bi-directional anchoring, as shown in Fig. S4 (ESI).

The influence of the energy dose upon the spatial extent of the poly(aryl) nodules along the Y and X directions was further estimated by SEM. Fig. 5 displays the elongation observed in the Y and X directions. It reveals two important features:

image file: c7nh00113d-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Plot of the thickness (measured by SEM) of the grafted poly(aryl) layer along the Y and X directions, as a function of the incident energy dose from 0 to 3 mJ μm2, (a) after plasmon-induced first carboxy-aryl layer grafting along the Y axis and (b) after second hydroxyethyl-aryl layer grafting along the X axis.

• The growth of the poly(aryl) layer with the energy dose is directional along the excitation polarization axis. Indeed, the elongation along Y increases with the energy dose when the excitation is polarized along the Y axis, while the elongation along the X axis remains constant and is inverse for the X polarization. The growth of the poly(aryl) layers in the X and Y directions is also evidenced by extinction spectroscopy, showing a progressive red-shift of the LSP with increased energy dose, and reaching a plateau value at ∼1 mJ μm−2 (Fig. S5, ESI).

• The thickness of the grafted layers increases with the energy dose, until reaching ca. 40–60 nm, depending on the diazonium salt: the carboxyphenyl-derived layers appear slightly thicker than the hydroxyethyl ones.

The influence of the incident energy dose upon the growth of the carboxy-terminated poly(aryl) layer was also controlled by SERS. The ratio of the relative intensities I1614/I1586 of the two bands at 1614 and 1586 cm−1, assigned respectively to the aromatic ring deformations in the poly(aryl) layer and in the first layer directly grafted on gold via Au–C bonds, was plotted against the dose (see Fig. 6).

image file: c7nh00113d-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (a) SERS spectra in the 1540–1660 cm−1 region, recorded on the nanodisk arrays after plasmon-induced grafting of carboxyphenyl layers along the Y direction; (b) plot of the I1614/I1586 SERS intensity ratio as a function of the incident energy dose from 0 to 3 mJ μm2.

An increase in the energy dose leads to a clear enhancement of the shoulder at 1614 cm−1, revealing the growth of the poly(aryl) layer. Although the SEM analysis indicates a continuous thickening of the poly(aryl) layers upon an increase in the incident energy dose, the I1614/I1586 SERS ratio reaches a plateau value at around 1 mJ μm−2, revealing the maximum distance from the nanostructure's surface probed by SERS. This energy dose corresponds to a poly(aryl) thickness of ca. 40 nm, as shown in Fig. 5, above which the additional poly(aryl) layers grafted on the gold nanodisks are no longer detected by SERS. Note that this distance correlates perfectly well with the spatial extent of the electromagnetic field, calculated using the DDA method (see Fig. S6, ESI). It is therefore possible to use this plasmon-mediated functionalization approach to probe the distance-dependence enhancement effect of SERS in hot spot regions. Moreover, it is an efficient way to modify only the regions of the high electromagnetic field whilst leaving the other area of the nanoparticle surface chemically passive.


In summary, we have shown that it is possible to pattern the surface chemical properties of plasmonic gold nanodisks by two different types of functional poly(aryl) layers, bearing either carboxyl or hydroxyethyl pendant groups. This double-functionalization strategy is triggered by the polarization of the incident illumination leading to a site-selective hot-electron mediated reduction of aryl diazonium salts. This approach offers several advantages over conventional spontaneous grafting methods: (i) it takes place in a few seconds upon laser irradiation, while the usual spontaneous methods require several hours; (ii) it leads to relatively thick poly(aryl) layers (up to 40–60 nm) using low diazonium salt concentrations. Moreover, the thickness of the aryl film can be monitored by the incident light energy. Interestingly, grafting occurs specifically in the regions of maximum field enhancement, leaving the other areas of the nanostructures surface chemically passive. We believe that this plasmonic-based approach will not only pave a new way for the multi-functionalization of plasmonic nanoparticles but also provide a general strategy to attach molecules to hot spot regions and further improve their SERS detection and analysis for (bio)sensing applications.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.


The authors would like to acknowledge the funding of C'NANO in France (project SYRENSS).

Notes and references

  1. (a) M. Sun and H. Xu, Small, 2012, 8, 2777–2786 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. Linic, U. Aslam, C. Boerigter and M. Morabito, Nat. Mater., 2015, 14, 567–576 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) G. Baffou and R. Quidant, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 3898–3907 RSC.
  2. J. S. Suh, N. H. Jang, D. H. Jeong and M. Moskovits, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 805–813 CrossRef CAS.
  3. (a) Y. F. Huang, H. P. Zhu, G. K. Liu, D. Y. Wu, B. Ren and Z. Q. Tian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 9244–9246 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) X. Yan, L. Wang, X. Tan, B. Tian and J. Zhang, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 30193 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. S. Mukherjee, F. Libisch, N. Large, O. Neumann, L. V. Brown, J. Cheng, J. B. Lassiter, E. A. Carter, P. Nordlander and N. J. Halas, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 240–247 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. C. Deeb, C. Ecoffet, R. Bachelot, J. Plain, A. Bouhelier and O. Soppera, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 10535–10542 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. Y. Takahashi, Y. Furukawa, T. Ishida and S. Yamada, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 8520–8524 RSC.
  7. N. Herzog, J. Kind, C. Hess and A. Andrieu-Brunsen, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 11697–11700 RSC.
  8. Y. Zhang, Q. Xiao, Y. Bao, Y. Zhang, S. Bottle, S. Sarina, B. Zhaorigetu and H. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 19062–19069 CAS.
  9. K.-H. Dostert, M. Álvarez, K. Koynov, A. del Campo, H.-J. Butt and M. Kreiter, Langmuir, 2012, 28, 3699–3703 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. M. Nguyen, A. Lamouri, C. Salameh, G. Levi, J. Grand, L. Boubekeur-Lecaque, C. Mangeney and N. Felidj, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 8633–8640 RSC.
  11. (a) E. Cortés, W. Xie, J. Cambiasso, A. S. Jermyn, R. Sundararaman, P. Narang, S. Schlücker and S. A. Maier, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 14880 CrossRef PubMed; (b) N. H. Kim, C. D. Meinhart and M. Moskovits, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 6750 CrossRef CAS; (c) V.-Q. Nguyen, Y. Ai, P. Martin and J. C. Lacroix, ACS Omega, 2017, 2, 1947 CrossRef CAS.
  12. I. Tijunelyte, E. Guenin, N. Lidgi-Guigui, F. Colas, J. Ibrahim, T. Toury and M. Lamy de la Chapelle, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 7105–7112 RSC.
  13. B. B. Rajeeva, D. S. Hernandez, M. Wang, E. Perillo, L. Lin, L. Scarabelli, B. Pingali, L. M. Liz-Marzan, A. K. Dunn, J. B. Shear and Y. Zheng, Adv. Sci., 2015, 2, 1500232 CrossRef PubMed.
  14. X. Zhou, J. Wenger, F. N. Viscomi, L. Le Cunff, J. Béal, S. Kochtcheev, X. Yang, G. P. Wiederrecht, G. Colas des Francs, A. S. Bisht, S. Jradi, R. Caputo, H. V. Demir, R. D. Schaller, J. Plain, A. Vial, X. W. Sun and R. Bachelot, Nano Lett., 2015, 15, 7458–7466 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. (a) A. A. Mohamed, Z. Salmi, S. A. Dahoumane, A. Mekki, B. Carbonnier and M. M. Chehimi, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2015, 225, 16–36 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) I. Bakas, Z. Salmi, S. Gam-Derouich, M. Jouini, S. Lépinay, B. Carbonnier, A. Khlifi, R. Kalfat, F. Geneste, Y. Yagci and M. M. Chehimi, Surf. Interface Anal., 2014, 46, 1014–1020 CrossRef CAS; (c) M. M. Chehimi, J. Pinson and F. I. Podvorica, Electrode Surface Modification Using Diazonium Salts, in Electroanalytical Chemistry, ed. A. J. Bard and C. G. Zoski, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016, pp. 115–224 Search PubMed; (d) Y. A. Atmane, L. Sicard, A. Lamouri, J. Pinson, M. Sicard, C. Masson, S. Nowak, P. Decorse, J.-Y. Piquemal, A. Galtayries and C. Mangeney, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 26000–26006 CrossRef CAS.
  16. (a) L. Laurentius, S. R. Stoyanov, S. Gusarov, A. Kovalenko, R. Du, G. P. Lopinski and M. T. McDermott, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 4219–4227 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. Betelu, I. Tijunelyte, L. Boubekeur-Lecaque, I. Ignatiadis, J. Ibrahim, S. Gaboreau, C. Berho, T. Toury, E. Guenin, N. Lidgi-Guigui, N. Félidj, E. Rinnert and M. L. d. l. Chapelle, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 18158–18166 CrossRef CAS; (c) R. Ahmad, L. Boubekeur-Lecaque, M. Nguyen, S. Lau-Truong, A. Lamouri, P. Decorse, A. Galtayries, J. Pinson, N. Felidj and C. Mangeney, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 19098–19105 CrossRef CAS; (d) M. Nguyen, X. Sun, E. Lacaze, P. M. Winkler, A. Hohenau, J. R. Krenn, C. Bourdillon, A. Lamouri, J. Grand, G. Lévi, L. Boubekeur-Lecaque, C. Mangeney and N. Félidj, ACS Photonics, 2015, 2, 1199–1208 CrossRef CAS.


Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7nh00113d

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018