Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

A novel synthesis protocol for Co3O4 nanocatalysts and their catalytic applications

M. Sivachidambarama, J. Judith Vijaya*a, K. Kaviyarasubc, L. John Kennedyd, Hamad A. Al-Lohedane and R. Jothi Ramalingame
aCatalysis & Nanomaterials Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Loyola College (Autonomous), Chennai 600 034, India. E-mail: jjvijaya78@gmail.com; Fax: +91-44-28175566; Tel: +91-44-28178200
bUNESCO-UNISA Africa Chair in Nanosciences/Nanotechnology Laboratories, College of Graduate Studies, University of South Africa (UNISA), Muckleneuk Ridge, P O Box 392, Pretoria, South Africa
cNanosciences African Network (NANOAFNET), Materials Research Group (MRG), iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation (NRF), 1 Old Faure Road, 7129, P O Box 722, Somerset West, Western Cape Province, South Africa
dMaterials Division, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) University, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600 127, India
eSurfactant Research Chair, Chemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Received 23rd June 2017 , Accepted 22nd July 2017

First published on 8th August 2017


Abstract

Co3O4 spinel nanoparticles (Co3O4-NPs) are synthesized via a green route using neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf by an efficient and simple hot plate combustion method (HPCM). The as-prepared Co3O4-NPs have been characterized by well-known recognized techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL), Raman spectroscopy, and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM). Co3O4-NPs were investigated in various application areas; for example, a multi-lamp photocatalytic reactor was used to degrade the hazardous textile dye waste (TDW) collected from the dyeing industry. Furthermore, the antimicrobial activity of the synthesized Co3O4-NPs was studied against Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) bacteria, in comparison to a chloramphenicol standard, and also evaluated by carrying out the catalytic hydrogenation of 4-nitrophenol and 4-nitroaniline in the presence of NaBH4 as a reducing agent. Noble metals have been reported earlier, but due to their high cost they needed to be replaced by a cost effective material. We have also discussed feasible mechanisms and catalytic activity of the Co3O4-NPs in different applications. Thus, we have proposed a novel, economic and green synthesis of Co3O4-NPs that is highly important in the present times for the removal of hazardous chemicals.


Introduction

The use of green synthesis methods for the preparation of metal nanoparticles provides advancement over various methods as they are simple, one step, cost-effective, environment friendly, relatively reproducible and often result in more stable materials.1 Physical and chemical methods can also be utilized to produce nanoparticles, but the rates of synthesis are slow compared to those of the routes involving plant-mediated syntheses.2 Although, the potential of higher plants as sources for this purpose is still largely unexplored, very recently, plant extracts of marigold flower,3 Ziziphora tenuior,4 Abutilon indicum,5 Solanum trilobatum,6 Erythrina indica7 and Sesuvium portulacastrum8 were reported in the literature as a source for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 5 to 20 nm, as an alternative to the physical and chemical methods.

Numerous investigations have been carried out on the chemistry of Azadirachta indica (A. indica) tree products. All parts of the A. indica tree, such as the leaves, flowers, seeds, roots and bark, have been used in traditional medicine as household remedies against various human ailments. Various medicinal utilities have been described, particularly for A. indica leaf.9 A. indica leaves exhibit a wide range of pharmacological activities and medicinal applications and have been used extensively as ingredients in ancient medicinal preparations because of their availability throughout the year as well as the ease of extracting the compounds.10 A. indica leaves contain 0.13% essential oil, which is responsible for the smell of the leaves.11 In particular, the leaf of A. indica is a ‘storehouse’ of more than 140 active organic compounds that are chemically diverse and structurally complex. These compounds are divided into two major classes: isoprenoids and non-isoprenoids. The isoprenoids include diterpenoids, triterpenoids, vilasinin type of compounds, limonoids and their derivatives, and C-secomeliacins. The non-isoprenoids include proteins, polysaccharides, sulphur compounds, flavonoids, dihydrochalone, coumarin, tannins and aliphatic compounds.12 Considering the massive potentiality of A. indica leaves, they can be used as a source in a biological green technique for the synthesis of cobalt oxide nanoparticles. In this regard, leaf extract of A. indica (commonly known as neem), a species of the Meliaceae family, was used as a capping and stabilizing agent to synthesize cobalt oxide NPs by a hot plate combustion method (HPCM). Cobalt oxide NPs can be produced using a low concentration of A. indica leaf extract without using any additional harmful chemical/physical reagents.

Cobalt oxide is a transition metal oxide and it occurs in five different oxidation states, such as Co, CoO2, Co2O3, CoO(OH), CoO and Co3O4.13,17 Furthermore, Co3O4 exhibits mixed oxidation states like Co2+ and Co3+, and it has a regular cubic spinel structure with the tetrahedral sites (8a) occupied by Co2+ ions and the octahedral sites (16d) by Co3+ ions.14 It is a p-type semiconductor, anti-ferromagnetic, highly stable and easy to synthesize in open air atmosphere. Co3O4-NPs can be synthesized by various methods, such as, electrodeposition,15 and hydrothermal,16 solvothermal,17 polyol,18 and thermal decomposition.19 Because of their unusual physical, chemical, magnetic and electronic properties, they have vast applications for use in electrochromic devices, gas sensors, supercapacitors, solar selective absorbers, fuel cells, catalytic applications and lithium ion batteries.20 Due to their low cost in comparison to the high cost noble metal NPs, they work as effective catalysts in heterogeneous chemical reactions.21 Some expensive noble metals have also been reported for applications in photocatalytic degradation such as the photo-electro-catalytic oxidation of the antibiotic tetracycline22 (73% removal efficiency using Au nanoclusters/TiO2 nanotube array); moreover, noble metals have been known to exhibit antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria like S. epidermidis, B. subtilis, and Gram-negative bacteria like E. coli and P. aeruginosa, where 90% of the bacterial population was killed by Au nanoclusters (NCs).23 AgNCs-daptomycin hybrid (D-AgNCs) provided the highest killing effect against the Gram-positive model bacterium Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).24 These revelations raised an interest in us to employ Co3O4-NPs in three different applications. Hence, in the present study, we synthesized Co3O4-NPs using A. indica leaf extract by an efficient green HPCM method, and the catalytic activity towards the photodegradation of textile dye waste (TDW) and the catalytic hydrogenation of 4-nitroaromatics (4-nitrophenol and 4-nitroaniline) was determined. The antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) bacteria is also reported.

Experimental section

Materials and methods

Cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate, Co(NO3)2·6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, purity ≥ 98%), and glycine, C2H5NO2 (Sigma-Aldrich, purity ≥ 98.5%), are the primary requirements for the synthesis of Co3O4-NPs. Sodium borohydride, NaBH4 (≥98.0%), 4-nitrophenol (≥99.0%) and 4-nitroaniline (≥99.0%) from Sigma-Aldrich were used for the catalytic reduction. For the examination of antibacterial potential, two microbiological media, Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) and Nutrient Broth (NB), and the commercial antibiotic, chloramphenicol, were purchased from Hi-Media Laboratories (Mumbai, India). De-ionized H2O obtained after sanitization through a Millipore system was used throughout the experiments. The rest of the chemicals was used without further purification.

Synthesis of Co3O4-NPs

An aqueous solution of cobalt(II) nitrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O), Azadirachta indica (A. indica) leaf extract (5 mL) and glycine (C2H5NO2) was used to synthesize the Co3O4-NPs via HPCM. The stoichiometric ratio of the precursors was used to synthesize the Co3O4-NPs and, finally 1.8 g of Co3O4-NPs was obtained. Primarily, the precursors were dissolved in 70 mL of deionized water and kept aside for 1 h with constant stirring to attain a homogenous solution. In the HPCM, the above homogeneous solution was placed in a hot plate (Barnstead Thermolyne, model no: SP46925) and uniformly heated up to 250 °C for 15 min, which led to the volatilization of water and combustion of the reaction mixture. The black coloured precipitate was then separated by centrifugation and washed several times with de-ionized water. The separated black powder was dried at 100 °C in a hot air oven and subjected to annealing at 300 °C for 2 h.

Analytical methods for catalyst characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were studied on a Siemens D5000 diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation in the continuous scan mode to collect data over the 2θ range of 10–90°. The Raman active modes of vibration were observed on the Raman spectrophotometer (STR-250 Seki Technotron Corporation). A high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analysis was carried out, wherein a Jeol JEM 4000EX electron microscopy unit with a resolution limit of about 0.12 nm equipped with a Gatan digital camera was employed for imaging and size and shape analysis of Co3O4-NPs. The chemical composition of the synthesized sample was confirmed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) using an Oxford instruments X Max solid-state Silicon drift detector operating at 20 keV. Magnetization measurements of the samples were performed on a Quantum Design Model 6000 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The diffuse reflectance UV-visible spectra of Co3O4-NPs were recorded on Cary100 UV-visible spectrophotometer to estimate the energy band gaps. In addition, the emission spectra were recorded using a Varian Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer at an excitation wavelength of 370 nm.

Photocatalytic degradation procedure and setup

A multi-lamp photocatalytic reactor was used to degrade the hazardous textile dye waste (TDW) collected from the dyeing industry at Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu, India. The reactor was fitted with low pressure mercury lamps (8/8 W), which could emit UV radiation. From our trial experiments, we confirmed that the wavelength of 365 nm is more suitable for the PCD of hazardous TDW. The borosilicate reactor tubes were designed in such a way that they could hold 100 mL of the hazardous TDW dye solution. The experimental procedure for performing the PCD reaction is as follows. The initial COD of the hazardous TDW was fixed (in mg L−1), a known amount of Co3O4-NPs was added to this solution and placed in the dark for 12 h to attain adsorption equilibrium, and the resultant COD was estimated. The above mentioned solution was placed inside the photocatalytic reactor and irradiated with UV light for 2.30 h. Equal aliquots were taken from the reactor tube at regular intervals of 30 min, followed by centrifugation and continuous recording of the UV spectra of the collected samples. The percentage of COD removal was calculated via the eqn (1):
 
% removal of COD (mg L−1) = (initial COD − final COD/initial COD) × 100 (1)

According to the recommendation of the Indian pollution control board standard, the hazardous TDW discharged from the textile dyeing industries into the aqua ecosystem must not exceed 250 mg L−1 COD,25 and therefore the PCD of hazardous TDW was analyzed using Co3O4-NPs to reduce the levels below 250 mg L−1 COD.

Catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol and 4-nitroaniline

The reactant 4-nitrophenol (1.7 mL) was added to an ice cold aqueous solution of sodium borohydride (1 mL) taken in a standard quartz cuvette. The light yellow colour of 4-nitrophenol was gradually transformed to yellowish green due to the 4-nitrophenolate ion formation. Then, a known amount of Co3O4-NPs (0.02 g) synthesized by HPCM was added to the above solution, and the time-dependent UV-visible absorbance spectra of the resultant solution were incessantly monitored at regular intervals of 30 s. Catalytic reduction of 4-nitroaniline was also followed by the same experimental procedure.

Analysis of the antibacterial potential of Co3O4-NPs

The antibacterial potential of the Co3O4-NPs was investigated against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains by the disk diffusion method. In total, four bacterial strains, which included two Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis) and two Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli) were chosen for the investigation. The bacteria were sub-cultured from pure cultures of different strains of bacteria on nutrient broth overnight at 37 °C. The turbidity of the bacterial cultures was maintained at 0.5 McFarland standard equivalence. Each bacterial strain was swabbed uniformly onto the surface of Mueller–Hinton agar medium in isolated agar plates using sterile cotton swabs under sterile conditions. The sterile paper disks were placed on the agar plates and 10 μL of 0.001 g/10 μL (w/v) of Co3O4-NPs was added into the disks. The antibiotic chloramphenicol (10 mcg per disk) was chosen as the standard drug for the determination of the antibacterial potential of Co3O4-NPs. All the strains of bacteria treated with Co3O4-NPs and chloramphenicol were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The antibacterial tests were performed in duplicates. The zones of inhibition were measured, which appeared as a clear area in each disk, and then compared with the standard chloramphenicol.

Results and discussion

The Co3O4-NPs prepared in the present study have several advantages including being environmentally friendly, their synthesis possessing economy in time of preparation, and incorporating commonly available and cost-effective chemicals such as cobalt(II) nitrate and glycine. In order to compare the various chemicals used for the synthesis of Co3O4-NPs with those used in other reported methods, Table 1 is presented.
Table 1 Co3O4-NPs synthesized by different methods using different chemicals
S/no Reference Chemicals used Method
1 L. M. Alrehaily et al., 2015 (26) N2O gas, argon, nano pure diamond UV ultrapure water system, gamma source, cobalt chloride and t-butanol Radiation-induced formation
2 Rodolfo Foster Klein Gunnewiek et al., 2016 (27) Ammonium polyacrylate and cobalt nitrate Modified-polymeric precursor method
3 Clément J. Denis et al., 2015 (28) CHFS process, cobalt(II) acetate, ethanol and nano pure diamond UV ultrapure water system Hydrothermal reactor under laminar and turbulent flow
4 Present work Cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate, glycine and Azadirachta indica Hot plate combustion method


X-ray diffraction studies were used to resolve the structural properties of the Co3O4 prepared using HPCM. The X-ray diffraction patterns show eight peaks at 31.27°, 36.86°, 38.57°, 44.82°, 55.69°, 59.38°, 65.26°, and 79.12°, which correspond to the (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), (440), and (620) planes that are in the cubic phase of Co3O4,29 respectively, (JCPDS card no. 43-1003). The size of the Co3O4 nanoparticles was calculated from the (311) diffraction peak using the Debye–Scherrer eqn (2):

 
image file: c7ra06996k-t1.tif(2)
where L is the mean dimension of the particle, θ is the diffraction angle, λ is the wavelength of the used Cu-Kα radiation, β is the full width of at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak and k is the diffraction constant (0.89). The calculated average size was about 0.24 nm, which is in good agreement with the HR-TEM results (X-ray diffraction pattern of Co3O4-NPs is given in the ESI, Fig. S1).

Raman spectroscopy studies were carried out at room temperature and were used to support the immaculateness of the synthesized Co3O4 nanoparticles. As previously highlighted, Co3O4 has Co2+ (3d7) and Co3+ (3d6) located at tetrahedral and octahedral sites, respectively. For a spinel, the space group theory of crystallites predicts the following active modes as “Fd3m” symmetry as represented in eqn (3):

 
Γ = A1g(R) + Eg(R) +F1g(IN) + 3F2g(R) + 2A2u(IN) + 2Eu(IN) + 4F1u(IR) + 2F2u(IN), (3)
where (R), (IR), and (IN) symbolize Raman active vibrations, infrared-active vibrations, and inactive modes, respectively. One can discriminate six active Raman modes; they are in the region of ∼145, ∼465.2, ∼506.4, ∼603, ∼676.8, and ∼755.5 cm−1. Apart from the last mode, all the observed modes are in concurrence with the values of pure Co3O4 spinel structure, with an average shift of the order of Δν ∼ 5 cm−1 (191, 470, 510, 608, and 675 cm−1). Although, the Raman mode at 684.5 cm−1 is ascribed to the uniqueness of the octahedral A1g sites, the Eg, and F2g modes are related to the combined vibrations of the tetrahedral site and octahedral oxygen motions.29 The average shift of Δν ∼ 5 cm−1 is accredited to the size effects or surface stress/strain (Raman spectra of Co3O4-NPs is given as ESI, Fig. S2).

High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analysis was used to examine the morphology of Co3O4-NPs at different magnification ranges. Co3O4-NPs possess high agglomeration with nearly quasi-spherical like shapes as shown in Fig. 1(a–g). During the sample processing in the HRTEM analysis, the high degree of agglomeration is due to the association of Co3O4-NPs in the highly concentrated sample.30 The Co3O4-NPs ranged in sizes of 1–7 nm, with most of the particles being about 3.5 nm in size, as shown in the inset histogram of Fig. 1a. Co3O4-NPs showed a polycrystalline nature, which was confirmed by selective area electron diffraction (SAED) analysis, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1f. This pattern was obtained due to the successive reflections correlated to (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), (440), and (620) lattice planes, which is well in agreement with our XRD results. The fringe spacing corresponding to the (311) lattice plane was measured to be 0.24 nm, which is in good agreement with the values reported in other experimental studies.31 The lattice planes of (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), (440), and (620) are correlated, due to the successive reflections of the observed SAED patterns, which are in good agreement with our XRD results. The lattice plane (311) was measured to be 0.21 nm and it corresponds to fringe spacing, which is in good agreement with the literature.32 The maximum purity of the Co3O4-NPs produced was confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), which showed the clear visible peaks of the respective cobalt and oxygen atoms. During the course of sampling, the sample was placed in a carbon coated copper grid sample holder and it clearly showed the noticeable peaks of copper and carbon presence in the EDX spectrum.


image file: c7ra06996k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a–f) HR-TEM, inset (a and f) particle size distribution of histogram and SAED pattern, and (g) energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of Co3O4-NPs.

Co3O4-NPs exhibits photoluminescence (PL) at room temperature (PL spectra are given in the ESI, Fig. S3). The surface morphology and the structures of Co3O4-NPs are closely dependent on their optical properties. Usually, the PL emission of metal oxide nanostructures is classified into two sections, including near band edge (NBE) UV emission and deep level (DL) defect associated with the visible emission. The radiative recombination of a photo-generated hole is a reason for the origin of visible emission and it is caused by the impurities and structural defects in the crystal, for instance, oxygen vacancies and cobalt interstitials. The direct recombination of the excitons through an exciton–exciton scattering is commonly attributed to the occurrence of UV emission. The absorption bands at λ ∼ 415 and 500 nm were assigned to the intervalence charge-transfer Co2+ ↔ Co3+, which represent the internal oxidation–reduction process and also the absorption peaks present at λ ∼ 500 nm, and indicate the ligand–metal charge transfer events O2− → Co3+ and O2− → Co2+, respectively.33 The set of peaks observed at λ ∼ 492 and 520 nm may be due to green emission. From the spectrum, it is noted that the intensity of the UV emission is more dominant than the visible emission intensity, which reveals that the surface morphology plays an important role in the determination of optical properties. It is evident that the strong UV emission between the shallow donors (related to oxygen vacancies) from the irradiative transitions and suppressed visible emission confirmed the good crystalline nature of the Co3O4-NPs, as previously reported.34

UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) was used to investigate the optical properties of the Co3O4-NPs at room temperature. The Co3O4-NPs possess direct transitions from the visible spectral region, because the nanoparticles behave as a semiconductor material.35 The optical band gap (Eg) can be calculated using the Kubelka–Munk (K–M) model,36 and the F(R) value is estimated from the following eqn (4),

 
F(R) = (1 − R)2/2R (4)
where F(R) is the Kubelka–Munk function, and R is the reflectance. The band gap can be estimated by extrapolating the linear region of the plot of [F(R)]2 versus the photon energy, and it was found that two optical band gaps (Eg) were formed for the Co3O4-NPs sample. The bandgap of 1.89 eV can be associated with the O2− → Co2+ charge transfer process (valence to conduction band excitation), while the 2.52 eV bandgap relates to the O2− → Co3+ charge transfer (with the CoIII level located below the conduction band).36 As shown in the literature,37 the Eg values of Co3O4-NPs are greater than those of bulk Co3O4-NPs (Eg = 1.77 and 3.17 eV, respectively). The specific assigned values of the two band gaps prove that the samples are pure and belong to the p-type semiconductor.37 The band gap energy of the Co3O4-NPs increases, which is an indication of the quantum confinement effect arising from the tiny crystallites.38 (DRS spectra of Co3O4-NPs are attached as ESI, Fig. S4).

The magnetic hysteresis measurements of Co3O4-NPs were recorded at room temperature. At the time of applied magnetic field, the magnetization (M–H) curve showed apparent linear behavior with no coercivity and remanence. Even at a high applied magnetic field of 4 kOe, no saturation occurred. This is definitely due to the anti-ferromagnetic barter interaction between the tetrahedral A sites and octahedral B sites occupied by cobalt ions in the spinel structure of Co3O4, resulting in zero net magnetization as a significance of complete magnetic spin reparation in magnetic sublattices.39 It is also evident that there is no manifestation of super paramagnetism over and above and no occurrence of magnetic impurities in Co3O4-NPs (magnetization vs. magnetic field loop of Co3O4-NPs is given as ESI, Fig. S5).

Co3O4-NPs were used in a pilot reaction for the PCD experiments in order to demonstrate their photocatalytic ability. Under UV light irradiation, the COD removal efficiency was evaluated for the hazardous textile dye waste (TDW). The disappearance of color affirms the degradation of the organic compounds in hazardous TDW when the COD level is decreased. UV-visible spectrophotometry was used to examine the photocatalytic activity of Co3O4-NPs on the degradation of hazardous TDW with continuous monitoring of the absorbance intensity of hazardous TDW; the COD removal efficiency was found to be affected by two tentative operating parameters, i.e., catalyst loading and the pH of the medium. The initial concentration was fixed at 650 mg L−1 and the degradation of hazardous TDW was investigated using different amounts of Co3O4-NPs loading. Evidently, the results show a linear increase in the COD removal efficiency with an increase in the catalyst dosage up to the optimum level of 40 mg of catalyst. Furthermore, the COD removal efficiency decreases when the catalyst dosage is increased, which is due to the formation of active sites on the catalyst surface, which increases to produce more hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) and superoxide radicals (˙O2).40 However, the formation of the NP agglomeration is due to further increments in the catalyst dosage and it can block the UV light illumination on the surface of the Co3O4 photocatalyst, which can hold back the production of (˙OH) radical, which is a primary oxidant in COD experiments.40 The positive holes (h+) are accountable for the major oxidation species on the surface of the Co3O4 photocatalyst, the produced H+ ions are adsorbed, thus resulting in the catalyst surface being positively charged. These adsorbed positively charged Co3O4-NPs support the excitation of photo-induced electrons, which would react with the adsorbed O2 molecules to produce superoxide radical anion (˙O2).41 Moreover, positively charged Co3O4-NPs would also restrict the recombination of excited electrons and positive holes and produce more hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) by the reaction between the positive holes and water molecules. Both the radicals ˙O2 and ˙OH are proven to be strong oxidants and are responsible for the enhanced photodegradation of hazardous TDW.

The kinetic studies of the PCD of hazardous TDW using Co3O4-NPs were also performed by employing the optimized parameters of t = 150 min, initial concentration = 750 mg L−1 COD, photocatalyst dosage = 40 mg, light intensity = 365 nm and pH = 2. Fig. 2 shows the extent of COD removal (mg L−1) with respect to time (min) in the presence of Co3O4-NPs during the PCD reaction and the COD removal efficiency of Co3O4-NPs in the degradation of hazardous TDW was calculated to be 73.86% after 150 min. The PCD reaction was stopped at 150 min because at this specific time, the concentration level of COD in hazardous TDW was found to be below 250 mg L−1 (as per the standards of the Indian pollution control board for industrial waste water let-out into river bodies). This reaction can be expressed using pseudo-first order kinetics by the following the eqn (5)

 
ln(Ct/C0) = −k1t (5)
where k is the pseudo first order rate constant (min−1), C0, the initial concentration of hazardous TDW (750 mg L−1) and Ct, the concentration of hazardous TDW at reaction time t (min). A pseudo first-order rate constant value of 1.03 × 10−3 min−1 was obtained from the slope of the linear plot of ln(Ct/C0) versus irradiation time (the corresponding plot is given as ESI; Fig. S6.) The possible degradation mechanism is shown in Scheme 1.
 
Co3O4 + hv → h+ + e (6)
 
H2O + h+ → H+ + OH˙ (7)
 
O2 + e → ˙O2− (8)
 
TDW + (OH˙/˙O2−) → degradation products (9)
 
TDW + hv → TDW* (10)
 
TDW* + Co3O4 → TDW+ + Co3O4(e) (11)
 
Co3O4(e) + O2 → ˙O2− + Co3O4 (12)


image file: c7ra06996k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Effect of time on the PCD of TDW in the presence of Co3O4-NPs (experimental conditions: initial concentration of TDW = 650 mg L−1 of COD, catalyst loading = 50 mg, λ = 365 nm).

image file: c7ra06996k-s1.tif
Scheme 1 PCD mechanism of TDW using Co3O4-NPs.

In above mechanism, the first three steps [(6)–(8)] involves the formation of active species for the PCD reaction, such as ˙O2 and ˙OH radicals obtained due to the illumination of UV light on the surface of Co3O4-NPs and the TDW degradation takes place in step (9). The steps (10)–(12) account for the sensitization of TDW molecules under the illumination of UV light and this process is able to insert the electrons into the crystal lattice of Co3O4-NPs, which would ultimately lead to the formation of ˙O2 ions upon reaction with O2 molecules, and would be utilized in the PCD reaction.

The catalytic activity of Co3O4-NPs was tested in the hydrogenation reaction using 4-nitrophenol and 4-nitroaniline, which is the most often used catalytic hydrogenation reaction. Hence, we selected two chemical reactions as model reactions i.e. the reduction of 4-nitrophenol and 4-nitroaniline by using the reducing agent, sodium borohydride (NaBH4).42,43 This reaction was continuously monitored at small timing intervals using UV-visible spectroscopy (Fig. 3). The strong absorption of 4-nitro-N,N-dihydroxybenzenamine at 400 nm was initially pragmatic, however a time profile study showed a significant decrease in absorption within 180 s. This appears to be a well-controlled chemical reaction that converts the nitro group to the amine group in the presence of the Co3O4-NPs without any observable side reactions or by-products. Moreover, no reaction occurred in the absence of Co3O4-NPs. A similar trend was observed for the reduction of 4-nitroaniline; there was a significant decrease in absorption at 394 nm within 180 s, and Scheme 2 depicts the schematic of the catalytic hydrogenation of 4-nitrophenol and 4-nitroaniline. These reactions proceeded under mild conditions, (i.e.) at room temperature and in an aqueous medium, thereby implying probable use in the treatment of industrial toxic waste water. Nitro-organic effluents of NaBH4 are also toxic, however this toxic effect is reduced because the reaction mechanism involves the production of sodium borohydroxide (NaBH2(OH)2). The catalytic activity of Co3O4-NPs towards the photocatalytic degradation of dyes and catalytic reduction of nitro-aromatics was compared with other reports, as is shown in Table 2.


image file: c7ra06996k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Time course profile for the catalytic reduction of (a) 4-nitrophenol, and (b) 4-nitroaniline using Co3O4-NPs.

image file: c7ra06996k-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Catalytic hydrogenation mechanism of (a) 4-nitrophenol, and (b) 4-nitroaniline using Co3O4-NPs.
Table 2 Comparison of Co3O4-NPs prepared by different methods and their catalytic activity
S/no Literature Synthesis methods Application Catalytic activity
1 Ravi Dhas et al. 2015 (44) Surfactant method is used to prepare Co3O4 NPs Photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B 78% degradation achieved in 180 min
2 Saeed Farhadi, et al. 2016 (45) Thermal decomposition of cobalt oxide complex to synthesize Co3O4 NPs Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue 74% degradation achieved in 150 min
3 Ismat Bibi, et al. 2017 (46) Green and eco-friendly synthesis of cobalt-oxide nanoparticle by Punica granatum peel extract Photocatalytic degradation of Remazol Brilliant Orange 3R (RBO 3R) dye 78.5% degradation achieved in 180 min
4 Sharma, et al. 2017 (47) Co doped CuO by precipitation method Reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol Reduction occurred at λmax = 403 nm in 180 s
5 Jan Krajczewski, et al. 2016 (48) Pt doped cobalt oxide NPs Reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol Reduction occurred at λmax = 399 nm in 3 min
6 Present work Co3O4 NPs prepared by HPCM method using Azadirachta indica (a) Photocatalytic degradation of textile dye waste. (b) Reduction of 4-nitrophenol and 4-nitroaniline (a) 73.8% degradation achieved in 150 min (b) reduction occurred at λmax = 399 nm in 3 min


The as-synthesized Co3O4-NPs were evaluated for their antibacterial potential against both Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial strains. Gram positive (Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis) and Gram negative bacterial strains (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli) were selected for this assessment. Chloramphenicol (CP = 10 mcg) was utilized as a standard in order to contrast the consequences of bacterial inhibition using Co3O4-NPs. The zone of inhibition (mm) values against both the Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial strains for Co3O4-NPs and the standard CP are listed in Table 3, and the inhibitory effect of Co3O4-NPs in comparison with the standard CP are plotted in Fig. 4. The antibacterial activity experiments have established that the Co3O4-NPs displayed outstanding antagonistic effects on both Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial strains compared to the standard CP, and the respective diameter of the inhibition zones in the bacterial strains are due to the antibacterial potential of the Co3O4-NPs and CP (Fig. 5). The differences in the susceptibility of different bacterial strains is due to the differences in their oxidative stress tolerance.49,50 The antibacterial potential mainly depends upon the particle size, specific surface area and morphology of the Co3O4-NPs; however, the clear mechanistic pathway for the inhibitory action of nanoparticles is still ambiguous. Few experimental studies have reported that this antibacterial potential is due to the result of an electrostatic interaction between the bacterial cell and the nanoparticles, which are capable of generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), a factor responsible for the bacterial cell destruction.51 In this point of view, two probable mechanistic pathways can be recommended as shown in Scheme 3. In the first pathway, the different positive oxidation states of cobalt ions (Co2+ and Co3+) in Co3O4-NPs can have a strong interaction with the negative part of the bacterial cell, thus leading to the destruction of bacterial cell.52 The other possible pathway happens, due to the irradiation of light on the surface of Co3O4-NPs, which can lead to the formation of an excited electron in the conduction band and positive hole in the valence band, respectively. The excited electron in the conduction band react with the oxygen molecule to yield the superoxide radical anion (O2˙), followed by the generation of hydrogen peroxide, a strong oxidizing agent. On the supplementary reaction of superoxide radical anion with water on the surface of Co3O4-NPs, the bacterial strain is ruined completely. Simultaneously, the positive hole in the valence band can react with water and produce hydroxyl radicals (˙OH). Although hydroxyl radicals and superoxide radicals do not have any effect on penetration inside the cell membrane, they remain in contact with the outer layer of the bacterial cell and break down the proteins and lipids. Thus, the antibacterial potential of Co3O4-NPs at nano level concentrations finds greater effect for the destruction of microbial organisms.

Table 3 Comparison of antibacterial activity of Co3O4-NPs with chloramphenicol standard
Bacteria Zone of inhibition (mm)
Chloramphenicol Co3O4
Staphylococcus aureus 10.6 16.3
Bacillus subtilis 20.8 22.2
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 20.5 34.5
Escherichia coli 20.1 16.4



image file: c7ra06996k-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Inhibitory effect of Co3O4-NPs in comparison with standard chloramphenicol against bacterial strains.

image file: c7ra06996k-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Zone of inhibition produced by Co3O4-NPs against the bacterial strains (a) Staphylococcus aureus, (b) Bacillus subtilis, (c) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and (d) Escherichia coli.

image file: c7ra06996k-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Schematic of (a) ˙OH formation by light irradiation, (b) inhibitory activity of bacterial growth using Co3O4-NPs.

Conclusion

In the present study, Co3O4-NPs were synthesized by a green and simple synthetic process using A. indica leaf extract by an efficient and simple HPCM. Co3O4-NPs were characterized by various techniques to depict their structural, morphological, optical and magnetic properties. The characterized properties include a good crystalline and hollow sphere like NPs with anti-ferromagnetic nature. Among the studies, the applications of the Co3O4-NPs in different fields like the PCD process, antibacterial analysis and catalytic reduction, were examined. Finally, excellent results were obtained in all the three applications, as reported herein. Hence, multifunctional Co3O4-NPs can be used for environmental remediation.

Acknowledgements

We thank Rev. Dr S. Lazar, S. J. Secretary, Loyola College for the infrastructure facilities given to carry out the present work successfully and authors (R. J and HAA) thank deanship of scientific research, King Saud University, funding through Vice deanship of scientific Research Chair.

References

  1. J. Mittal, A. Batra, A. Singh and M. M. Sharma, Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2014, 5, 043002–043012 CrossRef.
  2. S. Ahmed, M. Ahmad, B. L. Swami and S. Ikram, J. Adv. Res., 2016, 7, 17–28 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. H. Padalia, P. Moteriya and S. Chanda, Arabian J. Chem., 2015, 8, 732–741 CrossRef CAS.
  4. B. Sadeghi and F. Gholamhoseinpoor, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2015, 134, 310–315 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. S. Ashokkumar, S. Ravi and S. Velmurugan, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2013, 115, 388–392 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. P. Logeswari, S. Silambarasan and J. Abraham, Sci. Iran., 2013, 20, 1049–1054 Search PubMed.
  7. P. R. R. Sre, M. Reka, R. Poovazhagi, M. A. Kumar and K. Murugesan, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2015, 135, 1137–1144 CrossRef PubMed.
  8. A. Nabikhan, K. Kandasamy, A. Raj and N. M. Alikunhi, Colloids Surf., B, 2010, 79, 488–493 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. G. Brahmachari, Chem. Bio. Chem., 2004, 5, 408–421 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. A. Akhila and K. Rani, Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst., 1999, 78, 47–149 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. K. Biswas, I. Chattopadhyay, R. K. Banerjee and U. Bandyopadhyay, Curr. Sci., 2002, 82, 1336–1345 CAS.
  12. R. Subapriya and S. Nagini, Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents, 2005, 5, 149–156 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. M. Manickam, V. Ponnuswamy, C. Sankar and R. Suresh, Optik, 2016, 127, 5278–5284 CrossRef CAS.
  14. Y. Ikedo, J. Sugiyama, H. Nozaki and H. Itahara, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2007, 75, 054424–054428 CrossRef.
  15. N. Sattarahmady and H. Heli, J. Exp. Nanosci., 2012, 7, 529–546 CrossRef CAS.
  16. X. Wang, X. L. Wu, Y. G. Guo, Y. Zhong, X. Cao, Y. Ma and J. Yao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2010, 20, 1680–1686 CrossRef CAS.
  17. C. Yuan, L. Hou, L. Shen, D. Li, F. Zhang, C. Fan, J. Li and X. Zhang, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 56, 115–121 CrossRef CAS.
  18. J. Jiang and L. Li, Mater. Lett., 2007, 61, 4894–4896 CrossRef CAS.
  19. Z. Dong, Y. Fu, Q. Han, Y. Xu and H. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 18475–18478 CAS.
  20. H. Singh, A. K. Sinha, M. N. Singh, P. Tiwari, D. M. Phase and S. K. Deb, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2014, 75, 397–402 CrossRef CAS.
  21. H. Linhua, P. Qing and L. Yadong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16136–16137 CrossRef PubMed.
  22. K. Zheng, M. I. Setyawati, T. P. Lim, D. T. Leong and J. Xie, ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 7934–7942 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. K. Zheng, M. I. Setyawati, D. T. Leong and J. Xie, ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 6904–6910 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. Y. Liu, Q. Yao, X. Wu, T. Chen, Y. Ma, C. N. Onga and J. Xie, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 10145–10151 RSC.
  25. S. Kuboon and Y. H. Hu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2011, 50, 2015–2020 CrossRef CAS.
  26. L. M. Alrehaily, J. M. Joseph and J. C. Wren, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 24138–24150 RSC.
  27. R. F. K. Gunnewiek, C. F. Mendes and R. H. G. A. Kiminami, Adv. Powder Technol., 2016, 27, 1056–1061 CrossRef CAS.
  28. C. J. Denis, C. J. Tighe, R. I. Gruar, N. M. Makwana and J. A. Darr, Cryst. Growth Des., 2015, 15, 4256–4265 CAS.
  29. A. Diallo, A. C. Beye, T. B. Doyle, E. Park and M. Maaza, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 2015, 8, 30–36 CrossRef CAS.
  30. V. D. Mote, Y. Purushotham and B. N. Dole, Ceramica, 2013, 59, 614–619 CrossRef CAS.
  31. X. Xia, J. Tu, X. Wang, C. Gu and X. Zhao, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5786–5788 RSC.
  32. Q. Liu, J. Tian, W. Cui, P. Jiang, N. Cheng, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 6710–6714 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. S. Farhadi, J. Safabakhsh and P. Zaringhadam, J. Nanostruct. Chem., 2013, 3, 69–77 CrossRef.
  34. R. A. Tuwirqi, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, N. A. Aal, A. Umar and W. E. Mahmoud, Superlattices Microstruct., 2011, 49, 416–421 CrossRef.
  35. Y. G. Zhang, Y. C. Chen, T. Wang, J. H. Zhou and Y. G. Zhao, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2008, 114, 257–261 CrossRef CAS.
  36. A. Azam, J. Alloys Compd., 2012, 540, 145–153 CrossRef CAS.
  37. M. Y., Mater. Lett., 2013, 94, 112–115 CrossRef.
  38. C. Cao, C. Hu, W. Shen, S. Wang, H. Liu and J. Wang, Sci. Adv. Mater., 2013, 5, 1256–1263 CrossRef CAS.
  39. Y. Koseoglu, F. Kurtulus, H. Kockar, H. Guler, O. Karaagac, S. Kazan and B. Aktas, J. Supercond. Novel Magn., 2012, 25, 2783–2787 CrossRef CAS.
  40. S. K. Jesudoss, J. J. Vijaya, L. J. Kennedy, P. I. Rajan, H. A. Al-Lohedan, R. J. Ramalingam, K. Kaviyarasu and M. Bououdina, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 2016, 165, 121–132 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. P. Suresh, J. J. Vijaya, T. Balasubramaniam and L. J. Kennedy, Desalin. Water Treat., 2014, 57, 1–16 Search PubMed.
  42. H. Pablo, P. L. Moise, M. L. Luis, D. Joachim, L. Yan and B. Matthias, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 31, 5577–5587 Search PubMed.
  43. H. Linhua, P. Qing and L. Yadong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16136–16137 CrossRef PubMed.
  44. C. R. Dhas, R. Venkatesh, K. Jothivenkatachalam, A. Nithya, B. S. Benjamin, A. M. EzhilRaj, K. Jeyadheepan and C. Sanjeeviraja, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41, 9301–9313 CrossRef.
  45. S. Farhadi, M. Javanmard and G. Nadri, Acta Chim. Slov., 2016, 63, 335–343 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  46. I. Bibi, N. Nazar, M. Iqbal, S. Kamal, H. Nawaz, S. Nouren, Y. Safa, K. Jilani, M. Sultan, S. Ata, F. Rehman and M. Abbas, Adv. Powder Technol., 2017, 28, 2035–2043 CrossRef CAS.
  47. A. Sharma, R. K. Dutta, A. Roychowdhury, D. Das, A. Goyal and A. Kapoor, Appl. Catal., A, 2017, 543, 257–265 CrossRef CAS.
  48. J. Krajczewski, K. Kołataj and A. Kudelski, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 388, 624–630 CrossRef CAS.
  49. Y. Liu, Y. Zheng, B. Du, R. R. Nasaruddin, T. Chen and J. Xie, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2017, 56, 2999–3007 CrossRef CAS.
  50. Y. Liu, L. Yu, C. N. Ong and J. Xie, Nano Res., 2016, 9, 1983–1993 CrossRef CAS.
  51. P. K. Stoimenov, R. L. Klinger, G. L. Marchin and K. J. Klabunde, Langmuir, 2002, 18, 6679–6686 CrossRef CAS.
  52. Y. Liu, J. Xie, C. N. Ong, C. D. Vecitis and Z. Zhou, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2015, 1, 769–778 CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7ra06996k

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017