Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Copper(II) catalyzed synthesis of novel helical luminescent benzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-a][1,10]phenanthrolines via an intramolecular C–H amination reaction

Ramon Borges da Silva a, Rodolfo Inêz Teixeira a, James L. Wardell bc, Solange M. S. V. Wardell d and Simon J. Garden *a
aInstituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Centro Tecnológica, Bloco A, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, 21949-909 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. E-mail: garden@iq.ufrj.br; Tel: +55-21-3938-7135
bInstituto de Tecnologia em Fármacos – Farmanguinhos, Fiocruz. R. Sizenando Nabuco, 100, Manguinhos, 21041-250, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
cDepartment of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Scotland, UK
dCHEMSOL, 1 Harcourt Road, Aberdeen, AB15 5NY, Scotland, UK

Received 20th December 2016 , Accepted 20th December 2016

First published on 17th January 2017


Abstract

Correction for ‘Copper(II) catalyzed synthesis of novel helical luminescent benzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-a][1,10]phenanthrolines via an intramolecular C–H amination reaction’ by Ramon Borges da Silva, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem., 2017, DOI: 10.1039/c6ob02508k.


The authors regret that there was an error in the bottom part of Fig. 5. The correct figure is shown below.
image file: c6ob90191c-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (Top) UV-Vis absorption spectra of 6a in cyclohexane (green), CH2Cl2 (blue), MeOH (red) and CH3CN (black). (Bottom) Emission spectra of 6a in cyclohexane (green), CH2Cl2 (blue), MeOH (red) and CH3CN (black).

In addition, in the paragraph beginning ‘Initially, N-phenylpyridin-2-amine (4) was employed as a model compound to explore reaction conditions and to compare results with previously published studies.’ In the sentence ‘The reactions using 2-NBA and 3-NBA gave similar isolated yields of 4, but the reaction with 2-NBA was observed to be a more complex mixture of products which were, in large part, absent in the reaction with 3-NBA.’, compound number 4 should read 5. The correct sentence should read ‘The reactions using 2-NBA and 3-NBA gave similar isolated yields of 5, but the reaction with 2-NBA was observed to be a more complex mixture of products which were, in large part, absent in the reaction with 3-NBA.’

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.