Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: A critical comparison of coarse-grained structure-based approaches and atomic models of protein folding

Jie Hu a, Tao Chen b, Moye Wang a, Hue Sun Chan *cd and Zhuqing Zhang *ac
aCollege of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China. E-mail: zhuqingzhang@ucas.ac.cn
bCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710127, China
cDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada. E-mail: chan@arrhenius.med.toronto.edu
dDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada

Received 28th June 2017 , Accepted 28th June 2017

First published on 4th July 2017


Abstract

Correction for ‘A critical comparison of coarse-grained structure-based approaches and atomic models of protein folding’ by Jie Hu et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 13629–13639.


It has come to our attention that there is a typographical error in the legend of Fig. 2: “The black solid curve and the shaded band represent Rg = R0 × Nν with R0 = 1.330 and ν = 0.598 ± 0.028 obtained from fitting experimental data on an extensive set of proteins (ref. 38)” should read “The black solid curve and the shaded band represent Rg = R0 × Nν with R0 = 0.1927 and ν = 0.598 ± 0.028 obtained from fitting experimental data on an extensive set of proteins (ref. 38)”. The value R0 = 0.1927 nm was what we actually used to produce Fig. 2. This value follows the Correction to ref. 38 published in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2005, 102, 14475, which states that “the prefactor R0 is 1.927 Å”. This typographical error has no effect on the results presented in our paper.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © the Owner Societies 2017
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.