Dinh-Vu Nguyen,
Praveen Prakash,
Edmond Gravel and
Eric Doris*
Service de Chimie Bioorganique et de Marquage (SCBM), CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. E-mail: eric.doris@cea.fr
First published on 13th September 2016
Triphenylbismuth carbonate was shown to act as a mild, selective and efficient reagent for the oxidation of hydroxylamines. The developed reaction conditions were shown to be compatible with the in situ trapping of the produced nitrones by a strained alkyne, via a [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction.
As part of our longstanding interest in the chemistry of organobismuth reagents,9 we sought to investigate the use of triphenylbismuth carbonate for the oxidation of hydroxylamines to nitrones.10 The latter transformation usually operates in the presence of strong oxidizing agents such as methyltrioxorhenium,11 sodium hypochlorite,12 manganese dioxide,13 mercuric oxide, iodine, ceric ammonium nitrate, or tert-butyl hydroperoxide.14 More recently, hypervalent iodine reagents15 and catalytic systems, based for example on nanogold chemistry,16 have also been devised to perform the oxidation of hydroxylamines. However, extensive heating was sometime required which could be detrimental to the isolated yield of products.
With these features in mind, we conceived that the oxidation reaction of hydroxylamines 1 could be smoothly triggered by BiV reagents such as triphenylbismuth carbonate (Ph3BiCO3), to afford the corresponding nitrones 2 (Scheme 1). In fact, despite its position in the heavy elements group, bismuth can be seen as an eco-friendly metal with low toxicity.17 In addition, the ease of handling and relatively low cost of arylbismuth derivatives, make these compounds highly attractive in fine synthetic chemistry. In addition to the oxidation reaction, one could also expect the produced nitrone to react in situ with an alkyne via a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction.18 This sequential reaction would provide a “one pot” access to heterocyclic structures analogous to 3 starting from simple hydroxylamines.
:
6 mixture of regioisomers 2d and 2d′ in satisfactory yields (Entry 4). The influence of the electronic properties of the benzyl groups borne by the hydroxylamines was also scrutinized as regards again the regioselectivity of the oxidation reaction.
However, hydroxylamines substituted with either an electron withdrawing 4-fluoro (Entry 7) or electron donating 4-methoxy group (Entry 8) both provided a 1
:
1 mixture of oxidized isomers. Thus, there seems to be no major electronic effect of the aryl-substituents on the regioselectivity of bismuth-triggered oxidation of benzyl hydroxylamines.
It is to be noted that in the case of a cyclic hydroxylamine such as the one of Entry 9 (compound 1i), a different behavior of triphenylbismuth carbonate was observed as no nitrone was formed. Instead, the pentavalent bismuth reagent promoted the N-arylation of hydroxylamine 1i, resulting in the formation of N-oxide 2i in moderate yield (Entry 9). Although this difference in reactivity is not fully understood yet, one can hypothesized that geometrical constraints are at the origin of the observed discrepancy. This transformation failed on a 5-membered ring hydroxylamine (i.e. pyrrolidine-derived hydroxylamine) which decomposed under our reaction conditions, but was successful on cyclic hydroxylamine 1j (Entry 10). The arylated product 2j could however not be isolated by flash chromatography because of its intrinsic instability.
The issue of the regioselectivity of the oxidation of 1d was tentatively addressed by changing the reaction conditions (solvent, temperature, reverse addition of the reagents). Thus, hydroxylamine 1d was reacted under the conditions reported in Table 2, and the ratio of the isomeric nitrones 2d and 2d′ was measured by 1H-NMR analysis of the crude. However, none of the investigated conditions provided a satisfactory selectivity as the two regioisomers were obtained in almost identical proportions in each case, except that of the reverse addition (Entry 6) for which we observed a slightly better 2d/2d′ ratio (3/7). Noteworthy, CH2Cl2 was found to be the best solvent as regards the kinetics of the transformation (entries 1–3); the reaction run at 0 °C needed 12 h (Entry 4) and that at reflux (Entry 5) only 2 h to reach ca. 70% conversion (as opposed to 4 h at room temperature).
| Entry | Conditions | 2d/2d′ | t (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Conditions: 1 (1 equiv.), Ph3BiCO3 (1.2 equiv.), solvent and temperature as specified in the table.b Slow degradation of 2d′ was observed under these reaction conditions.c Addition of the hydroxylamine on Ph3BiCO3 over 30 min. | |||
| 1 | CH2Cl2, room temp. | 4/6 | 4 |
| 2b | THF, room temp. | 4/6 | 12 |
| 3 | CH3CN, room temp. | 4/6 | 6 |
| 4 | CH2Cl2, 0 °C | 4/6 | 12 |
| 5 | CH2Cl2, reflux | 4/6 | 2 |
| 6b,c | CH2Cl2, room temp., reverse addition | 3/7 | 4 |
A postulated mechanism for the Ph3BiCO3-mediated oxidation reaction is illustrated in Scheme 2 for the oxidation of N,N-dibenzyl hydroxylamine (1a). The first step could involve the formation of an oxygen–bismuth bonded intermediate by nucleophilic attack of the oxygen atom of hydroxylamine 1a on Ph3BiCO3. The existence of an analogous O–Bi intermediate has been well demonstrated by Barton and co-workers in the case of phenols.20 Subsequent rearrangement, via collapse of the transient species, leads to the formation of nitrone 2a with concomitant release of triphenylbismuth, carbon dioxide, and water. Attempts to run the above reaction catalytically using 10 mol% of Ph3BiCO3 in the presence of NBS/K2CO3 (ref. 21) were not satisfactory as NBS itself was found to be able to oxidize 1a to nitrone 2a.14
As our system efficiently promoted the oxidation of hydroxylamines at room temperature, we wanted to further explore the in situ 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of the produced nitrones with strained alkynes. If operative, this reaction would provide an interesting alternative to the conventional azide–alkyne “click” reaction, as previously investigated by Pezacki and co-workers.18 Thus, N,N-dibenzyl hydroxylamine (1a) was reacted with 1.2 equivalents of Ph3BiCO3 in CH2Cl2 at ambient temperature and in the presence of 1 equivalent of benzannulated cyclooctyne 4. After 2 h, we were pleased to isolate the expected cycloadduct 3a in 70% yield (Table 3, Entry 1). Although the two-step in situ process was slightly slower than the direct nitrone–alkyne cycloaddition reaction (i.e. 30 min),18 the reaction time in our case was mainly governed by the oxidation rate of N,N-dibenzyl hydroxylamine into the corresponding nitrone. It thus seems that the formation of the 1,3-dipole is the rate-limiting step of the oxidation/cycloaddition reaction. The sequential process could even be performed on a gram scale of 1a, providing efficient access to cycloadduct 3a in about comparable yields (76%). While the cycloaddition reaction worked well with a N,N-dibenzyl substrate, it was not operative with a bis-alkyl nitrone. Indeed, N,N-dioctyl hydroxylamine 1c was efficiently converted to nitrone 2c but failed to undergo [3 + 2] cycloaddition with strained alkyne 4 (Entry 2). Nevertheless, the “one pot” oxidation/1,3 dipolar cycloaddition cascade process was further extended to another hydroxylamine substrate (compound 1e) which reacted with triphenylbismuth carbonate and benzannulated cyclooctyne 4 to provide straightforward access to heterocycle 3e (Entry 3).
:
0 to 1
:
1) to afford compound 2a15 (10 mg, 95%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.23–8.18 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.26 (m, 9H), 5.06 (s, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 134.2, 133.1, 130.4, 130.3, 129.2, 128.9, 128.5, 128.4, 71.1 ppm. IR (neat) 1580, 1457, 1147, 903, 724 cm−1. MS (ES+): 212 [M + H]+.
:
0 to 9
:
1) to afford compound 3a18 (14.5 mg, 70%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.53–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.39–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.23 (m, 7H), 7.18–7.11 (m, 4H), 7.09 (td, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (td, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (s, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 3.43–3.35 (m, 1H), 3.22–3.15 (m, 1H), 3.12–3.05 (m, 1H), 2.97–2.90 (m, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 147.8, 141.3, 140.9, 138.9, 136.1, 132.4, 130.9, 129.9, 129.6, 129.3, 128.5, 128.4 (2C), 127.8, 127.6, 127.4, 126.9, 126.8, 125.6, 125.4, 110.3, 63.0, 36.8, 32.9 ppm. IR (neat) 1502, 1382, 872, 735 cm−1. MS (ES+): 416 [M + H]+.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: NMR data and copies of the 1H and 13C spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18578a |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |