Effect of Y3+ on the local structure and luminescent properties of La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ phosphors for high power LED lighting

Fu Dua, Weidong Zhuang*a, Ronghui Liu*a, Yuanhong Liua, Jiyou Zhongac, Wei Gaoa, Kai Chena, Lei Chena, Kenichi Katob and Kun Linc
aNational Engineering Research Center for Rare Earth Materials, General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, and Grirem Advanced Materials Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, PR China. E-mail: wdzhuang@126.com; griremlrh@126.com
bRIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
cDepartment of Physical Chemistry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received 20th July 2016 , Accepted 8th August 2016

First published on 9th August 2016


Abstract

A series of Ce3+-activated La3−xYxSi6N11 yellow phosphors were synthesized by high temperature solid-state reaction; their structures and luminescent properties were systematically investigated. The results of structural and spectral characterization showed that with the increase of Y3+ replacing La3+ in La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ (0 < x ≤ 0.9), the space group remains P4bm but with Y3+ occupying two crystallographic sites in different ratio, while the emission spectra exhibit a red-shift from 535 nm to 552 nm. Moreover, the thermal quenching properties of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ exhibit somewhat of a decrease with the increase of x value, but still remains at 95% (x = 0.9) of the initial emission intensity measured at 200 °C. In addition, the light quality is significantly improved by direct packaging with a blue LED chip. The above results indicate that La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ may be a promising phosphor for high power white-light LEDs.


1. Introduction

During the past few decades, rapid progress has been made in the development of white light-emitting diodes (WLEDs) because of their superior characteristics, such as high efficiency, long lifetime and environmental friendliness.1–5 However, rare earth ion activated white LED phosphors are mainly used in interior illumination or other medium–low power lighting. With the expansion of applications, white LEDs will gradually penetrate into the high-power lighting fields, such as automobile headlights, stadium, street lighting, industrialized illumination, and laser illumination. Therefore, developing phosphors for high power white-light LEDs may be a new trend in the future.6–9 However, the white light obtained by the combination of current commercial YAG:Ce3+ phosphor with blue LED chips10 not only suffers from problems of spectrum defect in the red region,11,12 which would result in high color-temperature (CCT) and low color-rendering index (CRI), but also unsatisfactory thermal quenching properties limiting their applications in high power w-LEDs.13 The shortage of spectrum deficiency can be improved by spectral tuning or adding red phosphors.14–16 However, highly resisting to thermal quenching is mainly depended on phosphor matrix.

In recent years, growing interest has been focused on Ce3+-activated La3Si6N11 yellow phosphor because it exhibits a broad emission band, high quantum efficiencies, especially, it shows superior thermal quenching property than YAG:Ce3+ phosphor. For these advantages, La3Si6N11:Ce3+ becomes a commercially available yellow phosphor and already applied in high power lighting fields. La3Si6N11 was first reported by Woike et al. in 1995, which was isostructural with Ce3Si6N11 and Sm3Si6N11.17 However, there were limited reports on Ce3+ doped La3Si6N11 yellow phosphors because the pure phase can hardly be formed due to the harsh synthesis conditions. The yellow-emitting La3Si6N11:Ce3+ phosphor was studied as host crystals of phosphor for the first time by Kijima in 2009.18 In 2013, George et al. further studied the relationship between local structural of Ce3+ and optical properties in detail and revealed two luminescent centers with different ratios of Ce3+ content.19 However, the emission peak of La3Si6N11:Ce3+ at greenish yellow region (∼535 nm), which would result in low color rendering index and high correlated color temperature. In order to obtain a high quality w-LED, it is necessary to shift the emission spectrum of La3Si6N11:Ce3+ to longer wavelength.

In this work, we chose Y3+ to substitute La3+ ion mainly due to the smaller ionic radius of Y3+ ion may large lattice shrink, leading to crystal field strength and finally resulting in red-shift of spectrum. However, the structure of Y3Si6N11 20 has a completely different structure with La3Si6N11, therefore, the solubility of Y3+ in La3Si5N11 is limited. The structure and ionic occupation were studied by high-resolution synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction, the luminescent properties and thermal quenching properties of La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ phosphors were also investigated in detail. The results demonstrated that La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ phosphors exhibited tunable emission wavelength and excellent thermal stability.

2. Experimental

2.1 Synthesis

The La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+ (0 ≤ z ≤ 0.2) and La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (0 < x ≤ 0.9) were synthesized by a high temperature solid state reaction. The stoichiometric amounts of LaN, α-Si3N4, YN, CeN powers were weighed out and ground in an agate mortar. All processes were performed in a dry glove box with purity nitrogen because the raw materials were sensitive to moisture and oxygen. The mixed powder were put into molybdenum crucibles and heated at 1750–1900 °C for 10 h with N2 gas flow of 0.7 L min−1 in the graphite resistance furnace.

2.2 Characterization

The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) date of the phosphors were collected by an X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) with Co-Kα radiation (λ = 0.178752 nm) operated at 40 kV and 100 mA with a scan speed of 6° min−1 in the 2θ range of 10–80°. High-angular resolution synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data were recorded at the BL44B2 beamline21,22 of SPring-8 synchrotron radiation facility (Japan) using a constant wavelength of 0.50026 Å and a large Debye–Scherrer camera at room temperature and using a constant wavelength of 0.5 Å. The lattice parameters and cell volume were calculated by the Fullprof suite software. The morphology was investigated by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S4800). The crystal structure was visualized by using the software VESTA. The photoluminescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra were measured at room temperature by a spectrofluorometer (Fluoromax-4, Edison, USA) equipped with a 200 W xenon lamp. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) was recorded by an intensified multichannel spectrometer (QE-2100, Otsuka electronics, Japan).

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Phase and crystal structure of La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+ (0 ≤ z ≤ 0.2)

Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+ (z = 0, 0.08, 0.10, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18, 0.20) samples. Most of the diffraction peaks of all samples can be index to the standard card no. 48-1805 of La3Si6N11, and show agreement with the pure phase of Ce3Si6N11 (standard card no. 85-0113). As La3Si6N11 and Ce3Si6N11 have the same crystal structure and similar ionic radii (r[Ce3+] = 0.103 nm, r[La3+] = 0.106 nm), it is possible that the JCPDS standard pattern of La3Si6N11 should be further confirm. It is worthy to note that we have successfully avoided the impurity phase LaSi3N5 18,19,23,24 using our sintering process. As seen in Fig. 1, the diffraction peaks shift to higher angle with the increase of Ce3+ concentration, ascribing to substitution of the smaller ionic radii of Ce3+ (0.103 nm) ion by the larger La3+ (0.106 nm) ion.
image file: c6ra18460j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+ samples (z = 0, 0.08, 0.10, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18, 0.20).

As shown in Fig. 2, the basic structural of the La3Si6N11 consists of SiN4 tetrahedral and La3+ ions. The SiN4 tetrahedra form two types of rings by linking at their corners. There are two La (La(1)/La(2)) sites with same coordination number in the host, which are surrounded by the Si4N4 and Si8N8 rings, respectively. To investigate the crystal field environment of surrounding Ce3+ ion, Rietveld refinement of high-angular resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysis for La2.86Ce0.14Si6N11 is carried out and shown in Fig. 3. In our study, we use Ce3Si6N11 as the initial model for structural refinement and the refined results are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 gives the basic crystallographic data of La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+. The parameters of the refinement are Rp = 3.45%, Rwp = 4.9%, and lattice parameters of a = 10.18852(1) Å, c = 4.84067(1) Å. Thus, the refinement parameters are reliable and illustrate that the pure phase La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+ is formed. As the Table 1 shows, the host material has two sites for activator Ce3+ ion. However, the vast majority of Ce3+ ions occupy the La(2) sites when the concentration of Ce3+ is 0.14 in spite of the ratio of total La(1)[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]La(2) was 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1, which is in agreement with Nathan's report.14 As they explained, La(2) site has a smaller average La–N distance compared to the La(1) site [2.70 Å for La(1) compared to 2.62 Å for La(2)]. The smaller ionic radii of Ce3+ prefers to substitution on the smaller La(2) site for low Ce concentrations (z ≤ 0.14).


image file: c6ra18460j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) Crystal structure of La3Si6N11. (b) Coordination environment of La3+ ions.

image file: c6ra18460j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Rietveld refinement patterns against SPD data for La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+ (z = 0.14) using Ce3Si6N11 as structure models.
Table 1 Selected crystallographic parameters from Rietveld refinement for the La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+ samplea
Atom x y z Biso Occu.
a Space group: P4bm (no. 100), a = b = 10.18852(1) Å, c = 4.84067(1) Å, α = β = γ = 90°, Z = 2, V = 502.480(1) Å3, Rp = 3.45%, Rwp = 4.9%, χ2 = 7.50.
La(1) 0.31922(2) 0.18078(2) 0.62714(6) 0.24054(2) 0.99(0)
Ce(1) 0.31922(2) 0.18078(2) 0.62714(6) 0.24054(2) 0.01(0)
La(2) 0 0 0.65326(6) 0.24054(3) 0.85(0)
Ce(2) 0 0 0.65326(6) 0.24054(3) 0.15(0)
Si(1) 0.07682(9) 0.21267(9) 0.12674(7) 0.90612(19) 1
Si(2) 0.61760(9) 0.11759(9) 0.61002(7) 0.90612(19) 1
N(1) 0.08392(9) 0.23264 0.43413 0.50000(4) 1
N(2) 0.65535(3) 0.15536(3) 0.93407(9) 0.50000(4) 1
N(3) 0 0.71831(3) 0.00024(7) 0.50000(4) 1
N(4) 0.50000(3) 0 0.58290(14) 0.50000(4) 1


3.2 Photoluminescence properties of La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+ (0 ≤ z ≤ 0.2)

Fig. 4 shows the excitation and emission spectra of La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+. The excitation spectrum shows two broad excitation bands with peaks at 360 nm and 455 nm, which are attributed to the transitions from the 4f to 5d states of Ce3+. Under the 460 nm excitation, a broad-band emission peaking at 535 nm with FWHM of 115 nm can be observed. The emission spectrum can be decomposed into two bands centered at 530 nm and 580 nm using Gaussian simulations. The energy gap between two bands is calculated to be 1817 cm−1, which is in agreement with the theoretical difference between the 2F5/2 and 2F7/2 levels (∼2000 cm−1).25 The PL intensity (λex = 460 nm) of La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+ with different Ce3+ dopant concentrations are shown in Fig. 5. The optimal emission intensity is obtained when z reached 0.14.
image file: c6ra18460j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Photoluminescence emission (λex = 460 nm) and excitation (λem = 535 nm) spectra of the La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+ phosphor.

image file: c6ra18460j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 The emission intensity and peaking location of La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+ with varying Ce3+ concentrations (z = 0.08, 0.10, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18, 0.20).

Additionally, the PL spectra (Fig. S1) show that there is no obvious change in the location of the emission band with different z (0 ≤ z ≤ 0.2). According to the previous analysis, the activators Ce3+ ions mainly occupy La(2) site, and there is a La(1) atom between two adjacent La(2) atom (as shown in Fig. 2), indicating that the interatomic distance between two activators has changed slightly, and the interaction can be ignored. On the other hand, with similar ionic radius of Ce3+ ion and La3+ ion, the crystal field strength surrounding Ce3+ ion also remains little change when La3+ ion is substituted by Ce3+ ion. Hence, the emission peak of samples did not show significant shift toward longer wavelength. However, as a commercial phosphor, a tunable spectrum may be more significant for application. Based on the yellow phosphor Y3Si6N11:Ce3+ as Liu reported,20 we chose Y3+ to substitute part of La3+, and synthesised solid solution La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ to make large red-shift of emission spectrum for the large difference of ionic radii between Y3+ and La3+.

3.3 Phase and crystal structure characterizations of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (0 < x ≤ 0.9)

The XRD patterns of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ with different doping Y3+ ion concentration are given in Fig. 6. The XRD patterns match well with the standard La3Si6N11 pattern and a little shifts in the diffraction peaks are observed, which indicated that the solid solutions are formed in the range of 0 < x ≤ 0.9. When x = 1.1, a small amount of impurities such as YSi3N5, Y2Si3N6 and LaSi3N5 are detected. The shifts of the diffraction peak positions are due to the change cell volume (Fig. S2). The lattice parameter a decreases with the increase in Y3+ ion doping concentration and cell parameter c essentially keeps unchanged, which shows that the tetrahedral gets shrinkage at the ab plane.
image file: c6ra18460j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 XRD patterns of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.1) samples.

The micro morphology of the La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9) phosphor samples are studied by SEM (Fig. 7). It is observed that the particles with clear edges columnar crystal and the diameters are ranging from 20 to 30 μm (x = 0, 0.1). Irregular and smaller agglomerates particles were appeared with the increase of Y3+ concentration.


image file: c6ra18460j-f7.tif
Fig. 7 SEM patterns obtained from La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9) phosphors.

To further confirm the exactly ionic occupation information with different percentage of Y3+, high-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction experiments were performed. The Rietveld refinements of the crystal structures used the Fullprof software. The patterns were fitted with the pseudo-Voigt profile function. The phosphors La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9) have been tested and the results of Rietveld refinements of the powder X-ray patterns are given in Fig. 8(a). The major parameters are provided in Table S1 (x = 0 can be read from Fig. 3 and Table 1). In order to fully understand the crystal field environment changes of surrounding Ce3+ ion, the lattice parameters change regularities for the samples with different x values are investigated. The distribution of Y3+ ion in the host lattice is investigated from the refinements result. As shown in Fig. 9(a), Y3+ ions mainly occupy the La(1) sites when doping with a small amount of Y3+ (x ≤ 0.1), which is due to the average La(1)–N bond length is larger than the La(2)–N and Y3+ ion is easier to enter the site of La(1) with less lattice distortion (x ≤ 0.1). With an increasing Y3+ ion doping concentration, the different La3+ sites are substituted by Y3+ with different proportion and Y3+ prefers to substitute on La(2) site (Fig. 8(b)). This phenomena is caused by the lattice shrinkage with the introduction of more Y3+ ions. In order to weaken the lattice distortion, more Y3+ ions occupy La(2) site preferentially because of the ionic radii of Y3+ is relatively closer to the La(2) site. As shown in Fig. 9(b), the average La(1)/Y(1)–N and La(2)/Y(2)–N bond length both are decreased gradually. Moreover, the average La(2)/Y(2)–N bond length reduces faster than La(1)/Y(1)–N bond length, which is consistent with the previous result. The cell parameters a, c and the volume of polyhedral VLa(1)/Y(1), VLa(2)/Y(2) also have been investigated (shown in Fig. 9(c)). Due to smaller ionic radius of Y3+, lattice constant a and b are decreased with increasing Y3+ concentration, while c is unchanged in all samples, which is similar with the reported in the literature.19 As shown in the inset of Fig. 3, all of La3+ are distributed in ab plane which is separated by the other planes (consist of [Si1N4] tetrahedral). Thus, the doping Y3+ and Ce3+ ions are also diffused in ab plane, which results in smaller change of the parameter c.


image file: c6ra18460j-f8.tif
Fig. 8 (a) Rietveld refinements of SPD for x = 0.1, 0.5, 0.9. Observed intensities (black mark), calculated patterns (red line), Bragg positions (green line) and difference profile (blue line) are presented. (b) The average structure of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ obtained by refining against SPD date, the Y and La atoms are shown yellow, red balls, respectively.

image file: c6ra18460j-f9.tif
Fig. 9 (a) Y occupancy of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ from the Rietveld refinement of synchrotron X-ray. (b) The average bond of La(1)/Y(1)–N, La(2)/Y(2)–N. (c) The crystal parameters of a, c and the volume of polyhedral VLa(1)/Y(1), VLa(2)/Y(2) from the Rietveld refinement of synchrotron X-ray.

3.4 Photoluminescence properties of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (0 < x ≤ 0.9)

Fig. 10 illustrates the room temperature emission spectra of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (0 < x ≤ 0.9) under 460 nm blue light excitation. The excitation spectra of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (0 < x ≤ 0.9) is given in Fig. S3. As shown in Fig. 10(a), with the Y3+ doping concentration (x value) increased gradually, the emission intensity of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ remained unchanged, while the emission intensity decreased rapidly as x > 0.1. There are two possible reasons for the low emission of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+. Firstly, the crystallization characteristics of solid solution may be weakened and irregular and smaller agglomerates particles are appeared as the doping Y3+ concentration increased (Fig. 7), this may lower the luminescent properties greatly; secondly, as the doping ions Y3+, Ce3+ were diffused in the shrinkage ab plan, the distance between Ce3+ ions became shorter, which enhance the nonradiative energy transfers. The normalized emission spectra (Fig. 10(b)) showed that the emission peaks significantly shifted from 535 nm (x = 0) to 552 nm (x = 0.9) with increasing Y3+ ion concentration. The red-shift ascribed to the larger splitting of the 5d energy level due to changing the local environment of Ce3+ ion.14 According to the above analysis, Ce3+ ion mainly substitute on the La(2) site when the Ce3+ ion doping content is 0.14, indicating that the crystal field splitting of the 5d energy level is mainly decided by the intensity of crystal field of polyhedral VLa(2)/Y(2). The volume of polyhedral VLa(2)/Y(2) gets shrinkage from 29.8939 Å3 (x = 0) to 27.6786 Å3 (x = 0.9) (Table S2). The volume changes will lead to decrease in the length of the average of Ce(2)–N bond and the variance of Ce(2)–N bonds gets enough strength.26 On the other hand, the structure symmetry of La3Si6N11 host becomes lower with increasing Y3+ concentration, both of two factors are enhanced the crystal field around the Ce3+ ion. Based on the mechanism of electron transition, the emit energy (ΔE) which is the electron transition from the lowest 5d energy level to the 4f energy level declined with increasing x. Due to the value of ΔE2 smaller than ΔE1, the red shift of emission peak takes place with the wavelength from 535 nm to 552 nm, as depicted in Fig. 11. The results demonstrate that the luminescence properties of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ is tunable by changing the La/Y ratios, which could be more flexible for the generation of white light by combination of other phosphors and LED chips.
image file: c6ra18460j-f10.tif
Fig. 10 (a) Emission spectra of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ phosphors under 460 nm Blue light excitation. (b) Normalized emission spectra of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ phosphors.

image file: c6ra18460j-f11.tif
Fig. 11 The changes in 5d energy levels of the Ce3+ excited state with Y3+ ion introduce in LSN phosphor.

3.5 Temperature-dependent photoluminescence properties and application in white LEDs

The excellent thermal stability of phosphors is one of important indicator for fabricating a high efficiency white LEDs, especially in high-power lighting fields. Fig. 12(a) shows the temperature-dependent luminescent spectra of La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+ (LSN) under 460 nm excited. La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+ exhibits a small thermal quenching, which remains 97.6% of the emission intensity measured at 200 °C. It is also observed that the emission spectra gets a little red shift with the temperature increasing from 50 °C to 200 °C, which may be caused by the larger Stokes shift at high temperature. The structure gets relaxation or lattice expansion with increasing temperature, just like the effect of the incorporation of Ce3+ ion, leading to the emission bond gets red shift.15 The temperature-dependent of the relative emission intensities for La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) (LYSN) and YAG:Ce3+ under 460 nm excitation in the range of 25–200 °C are shown in Fig. 12(b). The results suggest that the thermal quenching properties have a trend of slight drop with increasing Y3+ content. In order to further explain the high thermal quenching, configurational coordinate diagram was carried out, shown in Fig. S4.27–30 As shown, the position of 5d energy level is controlled by the emit energy and the force constants of the chemical bond. With the above analysis, the emit energy (ΔE) of LYSN is smaller than LSN, indicating that the 5d energy level will decline and the crossing point A is dropped to A′, as shown by the red line. The force constants of Ce–N bonds can be considered essentially unchanged due to the small red-shift of spectral. Moreover, the crystal structure symmetry of LYSN will be lower because of the difference of structure between LSN (tetragonal) and YSN (orthorhombic). These two factors are responsible for the thermal quenching of LYSN. However, compared with the commercial YAG:Ce3+ phosphor, La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ still show a small thermal quenching temperature. The extraordinary thermal quenching property indicates that La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ have a wide application in high-power lighting fields.
image file: c6ra18460j-f12.tif
Fig. 12 (a) Temperature-dependent PL spectra of La2.86Si6N11:0.14Ce3+; inset shows the normalized emission intensity as a function of temperature (λex = 460 nm). (b) The dependence of normalized PL intensities on temperature for phosphors, excited at 460 nm.

Fig. 13 shows the corresponding CIE coordinates of the samples of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ with different doping Y3+ content. The chromaticity coordinates of LYSN phosphors can be tuned from greenish-yellow region (0.4245, 0.5528) to yellow region (0.4727, 0.5150). To evaluate the new solid solutions La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ phosphors for application in white-LEDs, the La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0, 0.5, 0.9) samples are packaged with 445 nm InGaN-based chip with the driven current at 60 mA. The corresponding CCT, CRI, CIE, and (EQE) are summarized in Table 2. The results indicate that the optical characteristics have been improved apart from the luminous efficiency, which is a great significance for warm white light output. However, a further study on how to improve the efficiency of LYSN is still necessary, such as controlling the particle size, distribution, morphology and crystalline.31 The outstanding thermal stability and tunable luminescence properties of the LYSN are presented here for evaluating their potential applications for high quality w-LEDs.


image file: c6ra18460j-f13.tif
Fig. 13 Color coordinate of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) as-prepared under 445 nm. The inset shows the photograph of the La2.76Y0.1Si6N11:0.14Ce3+ phosphor under the nature light.
Table 2 The CCT, CRI, CIE of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ samples (x = 0, 0.5, 0.9) under a drive current of 60 mA and external quantum efficiency of the samples under 450 nm
x CCT (K) CRI CIE (x, y) EQE
0 5570 64.5 (0.33, 0.36) 0.76
0.5 5146 68.9 (0.35, 0.40) 0.34
0.9 4437 74.2 (0.37, 0.41) 0.18


4. Conclusions

A series of nitride yellow phosphors La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ were synthesized by solid-state reaction. The crystal structure, luminescence property and thermal quenching property had been investigated. Two different sites for Ce3+ ion in the host and Ce3+ were favoring substitution on the smaller La(2) site. By introducing Y3+ into the La3Si6N11 host and the structure determination demonstrates that the different La3+ sites were substituted by Y3+ with different proportion and Y3+ prefers to substitute on La(2) site, and the crystal field around the Ce3+ ion is enhanced, resulting the emission spectra tuned from 535 nm to 552 nm. A warm white light with relative high CRI and lower CCT can be obtained under the blue light excitation. La3−xYxSi6N11:Ce3+ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.9) exhibits a small thermal quenching, which remains 97.6% (x = 0) and 95% (x = 0.9) of the initial emission intensity measured at 200 °C, respectively. The tunable luminescence properties and outstanding thermal stability indicate that this new solid solutions can be potential phosphor for blue-chip LED applications, especially for the warm white light in high power field.

Acknowledgements

The work is financially supported from the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB643801) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51102021, 51302016). The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed at the BL44B2 of Spring-8 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal No. 2015B1127 and 2016A1060).

References

  1. E. F. Schubert and J. K. Kim, Science, 2005, 308, 1274–1278 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. M. S. Shur and R. Zukauskas, Proc. IEEE, 2005, 93, 1691–1703 CrossRef CAS.
  3. T. Justel, H. Nikol and C. Ronda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 3084–3103 CrossRef CAS.
  4. R. J. Xie and N. Hirosaki, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 2007, 8, 588–600 CrossRef CAS.
  5. C. C. Lin and R. S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2011, 2, 1268–1277 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. X. J. Zhang, L. Huang, F. J. Pan, M. M. Wu, J. Wang, Y. Chen and Q. Su, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 4, 2709–2717 Search PubMed.
  7. X. J. Zhang, J. Wang, L. Huang, F. J. Pan, Y. Chen, B. F. Lei, M. Y. Peng and M. M. Wu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 18, 10044–10054 Search PubMed.
  8. X. J. Zhang, J. B. Yu, J. Wang, C. B. Zhu, J. H. Zhang, R. Zou, B. F. Lei, Y. L. Liu and M. M. Wu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 51, 28122–28127 Search PubMed.
  9. L. Huang, Y. W. Zhu, X. J. Zhang, R. Zou, F. J. Pan, J. Wang and M. M. Wu, Chem. Mater., 2016, 5, 1495–1502 CrossRef.
  10. C. H. Huang, Y. C. Chiu, Y. T. Yeh, T. S. Chan and T. M. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4, 6661–6668 CAS.
  11. R. Kasuya, A. Kawano, T. Isobe, H. Kuma and J. Katano, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2007, 91, 111916-1–111916-3 CrossRef.
  12. R. M. Mach, G. Mueller, M. R. Krames, H. A. Hoppe, F. Stadler, W. Schnick, T. Juestel and P. Schmidt, Phys. Status Solidi A, 2005, 202, 1727–1732 CrossRef.
  13. J. Y. Zhong, W. D. Zhuang, X. R. Xing, L. G. Wang, Y. F. Li, Y. L. Zheng, R. H. Liu, Y. H. Liu and Y. S. Hu, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 674, 93–97 CrossRef CAS.
  14. A. A. Setlur, W. J. Heward, M. E. Hannah and U. Happek, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 6277–6283 CrossRef CAS.
  15. Y. Q. Li, N. Hirosaki, R. J. Xie, T. Takeda and M. Mitomo, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 6704–6714 CrossRef CAS.
  16. S. P. Lee, C. H. Huang, T. S. Chan and T. M. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 7260–7267 CAS.
  17. M. Woike and W. Jeitschko, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 5105–5108 CrossRef CAS.
  18. T. Seto, N. Kijima and N. Hirosaki, ECS Trans., 2009, 25, 247–252 CAS.
  19. N. C. George, A. Birkel, J. Brgoch, B. C. Hong, A. A. Mikhailovsky, K. Page, A. Llobet and R. Seshadri, Inorg. Chem., 2013, 52, 13730–13741 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. L. H. Liu, R. J. Xie, W. Y. Li, N. Hirosaki, Y. Yamamoto and X. D. Sun, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2013, 96, 1688–1690 CrossRef CAS.
  21. K. Kato, R. Hirose, M. Takemoto, S. Ha, J. Kim, M. Higuchi, R. Matsuda, S. Kitagawa and M. Takata, The RIKEN Materials Science Beamline at Spring-8: Towards Visualization of Electrostatic Interaction, Australia, 2010, pp. 9–10 Search PubMed.
  22. K. Kato and H. Tanaka, Advances in Physics: X, 2016, 1, 55–80 CrossRef.
  23. W. B. Prak, T. H. Kwon and K. S. Sohn, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2015, 98, 490–494 CrossRef.
  24. T. Suehiro, H. Hirosaki and R. J. Xie, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2011, 3, 811–816 CAS.
  25. Z. G. Xia and R. S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 15604–15609 CAS.
  26. W. F. Huang, F. Yoshimura, K. Ueda, Y. Shimomura, H. S. Sheu, T. S. Chan, H. F. Greer, W. Z. Zhou, S. F. Hu, R. S. Liu and J. P. Attfield, Angew. Chem., 2013, 125, 8260–8264 CrossRef.
  27. C. Wang, Z. Y. Zhao, Q. S. Wu, S. Y. Xin and Y. H. Wang, CrystEngComm, 2014, 16, 9651–9656 RSC.
  28. L. Chen, R. H. Liu, W. D. Zhuang, Y. H. Liu, Y. S. Hu, X. F. Zhou, W. Gao and X. L. Ma, CrystEngComm, 2015, 17, 3687–3694 RSC.
  29. Y. T. Tsai, C. Y. Chiang, W. Z. Zhou, J. F. Lee, H. S. Sheu and R. S. Liu, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2015, 137, 8936–8939 CAS.
  30. F. J. Pan, M. Zhou, J. H. Zhang, X. J. Zhang, J. Wang, L. Huang, X. J. Kuang and M. M. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 5671–5678 RSC.
  31. Z. G. Xia, S. H. Miao, M. S. Molokeev, M. Y. Chen and Q. L. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, 1336–1344 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Parameters information of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ (x = 0.1, 0.5, 0.9) and crystallographic data after refinements of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+. Excitation spectra of La2.86−xYxSi6N11:0.14Ce3+ and emission spectra of La3−zSi6N11:zCe3+. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18460j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.