Alfonso
Martinez-Felipe
*a,
Andrew G.
Cook
b,
Jordan P.
Abberley
b,
Rebecca
Walker
b,
John M. D.
Storey
b and
Corrie T.
Imrie
b
aChemical and Materials Engineering Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Old Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK. E-mail: a.martinez-felipe@abdn.ac.uk
bDepartment of Chemistry, School of Natural and Computing Sciences, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Old Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK
First published on 27th October 2016
We have studied the relationships between liquid crystallinity and hydrogen bonding in mixtures containing 4-pentoxybenzoic acid, 5OBA, and five bipyridines, XBiPy, with spacers having different flexibilities, namely: 4,4′-bipyridine (BiPy), 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (EthaBiPy), trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene (EthylBiPy), 4,4′-trimethylene-dipyridine (PropBiPy), and 4,4′-tetramethylene-dipyridine (ButBiPy). The XBiPy/5OBA mixtures exhibit liquid crystal behaviour for a range of acid concentrations, and predominantly smectic behaviour. The 1:2 mixtures have been studied using temperature-dependent Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, FT-IR, with particular focus on the Fermi bands associated with the hydroxyl groups and on the carbonyl stretching regions. The latter has been interpreted in terms of contributions arising from a number of species, namely the heterocomplex, and free, dimeric and oligomeric acid species. This analysis reveals that the heterocomplexes formed by hydrogen bonding between the unlike species tend to be the dominant species but at all temperatures coexist in equilibria with acid monomers, dimers and oligomers. The hydrogen bond strength in the heterocomplexes is predicted by molecular modelling to be stronger than that in the acid dimers. The smectic behaviour of these mixtures is accounted for in terms of the stabilisation of the layered structures arising from hydrogen bonded catemer strands. The liquid crystal behaviour of these and similar hydrogen bonded liquid crystals, HBLCs, cannot be explained solely by the formation of the heterocomplex between the unlike species, but instead a more realistic view must take into account the presence and concentrations of various different supramolecular species and the interactions between them.
The first examples of HBLCs, the n-alkoxybenzoic acids, were reported by Gray and Jones3–5 some 60 years ago. The liquid crystallinity exhibited by these was attributed to the assembly of hydrogen bonded dimers with a supramolecular core formed by the two acid molecules, 1, shown schematically in Fig. 1(b), and this homologous series remains the focus of considerable research activity, see for example.6–10
This concept in molecular engineering was later extended by Kato and Frechet, who mixed unlike hydrogen bond donors and hydrogen bond acceptors resulting in hydrogen bonded heterocomplexes, 2, and this approach is sketched in Fig. 1(c).11,12
These investigations subsequently triggered the preparation of many different supramolecular liquid crystals via molecular recognition.1,2 For example, extended supramolecular cores can be obtained in 2:1 complexes formed by linear monofunctional hydrogen bond donors, such as alkoxybenzoic acids, with bifunctional bipyridyl hydrogen bond acceptors, see Fig. 1(d).13
Hydrogen bonding has particular advantages in the preparation of supramolecular dimeric liquid crystals. Conventional covalent liquid crystal dimers consist of molecules containing two mesogenic groups linked via a flexible alkyl spacer,14,15 see Fig. 1(e). Liquid crystal dimers can broadly be divided into two classes, namely, symmetric and non-symmetric. In a symmetric dimer the two mesogenic groups are the same whereas in a non-symmetric dimer they differ. These were initially studied as model compounds for liquid crystal polymers16,17 although it soon became apparent that they were of fundamental interest in their own right. Indeed their study resulted in the discovery of intercalated smectic phases18–21 and very recently, of the twist-bend nematic phase.22–24 Higher liquid crystal oligomers such as trimers containing three mesogenic groups and two spacers25,26 and tetramers having four liquid crystal groups and three spacers27,28 have also been shown to exhibit fascinating phase behaviour including the twist-bend nematic phase.29–31 The first examples of supramolecular symmetric liquid crystal dimers were reported by Kato and co-workers, and consisted of 2:1 complexes assembled using a bifunctional non-mesogenic dicarboxylic acid and extended stilbazole moieties, 3.32 This approach was inverted by Yu and Pan, who reported complexes formed by mixing a central dimeric stilbazole-based hydrogen bond donor with an alkanoic acid 4.33
Wallage and Imrie extended this approach to include non-symmetric dimers by mixing a pyridyl-based hydrogen bond acceptor attached via a flexible spacer to a conventional azobenzene-based mesogenic unit, with an alkoxybenzoic acid, 5, and this is sketched in Fig. 1(g).34
A wide variety of supramolecular liquid crystal dimers have now been studied and their behaviour may be regulated by varying the spacer length and the structures of the individual components. For example, cholesteric phases can be induced by incorporating short spacers containing chiral centres,35 or by attaching a cholesterol-based moiety at one end of the complex.36 In a different approach in which we control molecular shape using hydrogen bonding, we have recently reported the first example of a supramolecular trimer, 6 and sketched in Fig. 1(h), to show the twist-bend nematic phase.37
The liquid crystalline behaviour of HBLCs is most often explained by invoking the quantitative formation of the proposed homo- or heterocomplex, see Fig. 1. It has been shown recently, however, that the formation of supramolecular dimeric (and oligomeric) architectures does not rely only on the composition of the system and geometric considerations, but also on the strength of the hydrogen bond.38–40 As part of a systematic study of supramolecular liquid crystals, here we report the phase behaviour for mixtures of 4-pentoxybenzoic acid, 5OBA, as the hydrogen bond donor, with five different bifunctional pyridyl-based derivatives, XBiPy, serving as the hydrogen bond acceptors. The structures of these components and the acronyms used to refer to them are shown in Fig. 2. The hydrogen bond acceptors were selected specifically to include both rigid and flexible bipyridyls, and also with the expectation of obtaining linear and bent heterocomplexes. We have also performed a detailed temperature dependent Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study, FT-IR, of each of the 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA mixtures, and underpinned these studies using molecular modelling. The present study provides further insights into the relationships between hydrogen bonding and mesomorphism, as part of an on-going programme to design novel HBLCs having tailored properties and functionalities.
Fig. 2 Chemical structures and acronyms of the hydrogen bond donor, 5OBA, and the bifunctional hydrogen bond acceptors, XBiPy. |
T Cr–I/°C, aTCr–N/°C, bTN–I/°C | ΔSCr–I/R, aΔSCr–N/R; bΔSN–I/R | |
---|---|---|
5OBA | a125, b151 | a6.46, b0.54 |
BiPy | 113 | 5.47 |
EthylBiPy | 153 | 6.62 |
EthaBiPy | 112 | 7.72 |
PropBiPy | 60 | 9.71 |
ButBiPy | 112 | 10.27 |
At the highest acid concentration each XBiPy/5OBA mixture shows exclusively nematic behaviour, see Fig. 3. On decreasing the acid concentration, smectic behaviour emerges in each set of mixtures with the exception of the PropBiPy/5OBA system. For the mixtures containing rigid hydrogen bond acceptors (BiPy, EthylBiPy) smectic behaviour is strongly favoured as the concentration of the hydrogen bond acceptor is increased. Similar behaviour is observed for the more flexible, but essentially semi-rigid, EthaBiPy/5OBA system. Fig. 5 compares the liquid crystal–isotropic transition temperatures for each set of mixtures, and the clearing temperature increases in the order:
PropBiPy/5OBA < ButBiPy/5OBA < EthaBiPy/5OBA < BiPy/5OBA < EthylBiPy/5OBA |
The trends in liquid crystalline behaviour revealed in Fig. 3 and 5 would most commonly be attributed to the formation of a 1:2 hydrogen bonded heterocomplex between the hydrogen bond donor, 5OBA, and the hydrogen bond acceptor, XBiPy, as shown schematically in Fig. 1(f). Within this explanation, the enhanced structural anisotropy of the heterocomplex compared to the structures of the individual components is used to account for the promotion of liquid crystallinity in the mixtures. In order to examine the validity of this interpretation, we now turn our attention to the transitional properties of the 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA mixtures and these are listed in Table 2. As we have seen already in the phase diagrams shown in Fig. 3, the 1:2-EthaBiPy/5OBA mixture shows exclusively SmA behaviour, the 1:2-BiPy/5OBA, 1:2-EthylBiPy/5OBA and 1:2-ButBiPy/5OBA mixtures exhibit smectic A and nematic phases, whereas the 1:2-PropBiPy/5OBA mixture is not liquid crystalline.
T Cr–SmA/°C, aTSmA–N/°C | T SmA–I/°C, bTN–I/°C; cTCr–I/°C | ΔSCr–SmA/R, aΔSSmA–N/R | ΔSSmA–I/R, bΔSN–I/R; | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BiPy/5OBA | 120, a155 | b156 | 3.02, a0.61 | b0.55 |
EthylBiPy/5OBA | 128, a172 | b174 | 1.58, a0.54 | b0.57 |
EthaBiPy/5OBA | 129 | 151 | 1.99 | 1.61 |
PropBiPy/5OBA | — | c95 | — | — |
ButBiPy/5OBA | 121, a130 | 139 | 1.49, a0.55 | b0.54 |
The entropy changes associated with the clearing transitions, see Table 2, are entirely consistent with the proposed phase assignments,46 although it may be argued that for ButBiPy/5OBA the entropy change is low if compared to those observed for even-membered liquid crystal dimers.47 At first sight, these thermodynamic data may be viewed as being broadly consistent with the essentially quantitative formation of 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA H-bonded complexes. However, a closer inspection reveals a number of significant inconsistencies with this intuitively pleasing explanation. First, the spread of transition temperatures between the proposed hydrogen bonded complexes is considerably narrower than that seen for covalently bound analogues. To illustrate this, Table 3 shows the transition temperatures for a set of low molar mass liquid crystals containing the same central linkage as found in the XBiPy hydrogen bond acceptors, but in which the hydrogen bonds have been replaced by Schiff's base linkages.48 In the covalent materials, replacing a butyl spacer by a single bond increases the nematic–isotropic transition temperature, TN–I, by over 120 °C. By comparison the same structural change in the 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA mixtures increases TN–I by only 17 °C. An even larger difference is apparent on replacing an ethyl linkage by a single bond, namely over 78 °C in the covalent example and just 5 °C for the corresponding 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA mixtures.
X | Transition temperature/°C |
---|---|
a Cr: crystal; N: nematic; I: isotropic; dec: decomposing. | |
— | Cr 266 N dec 390 I |
CC | Cr 238 N dec 360 I |
CH2CH2 | Cr 171 N 312 I |
(CH2)4 | Cr 156 N 270 I |
The second inconsistency with the suggestion of the quantitative formation of the 1:2 complex involves the dependence of the clearing temperature on composition. Specifically, the phase diagrams do not show pronounced maxima in the liquid-crystal-isotropic transition temperature curve for the corresponding 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA mixtures as would be expected if the hydrogen bonded complex was formed quantitatively.13 Instead, the liquid crystal–isotropic transition curves are rather flat, see Fig. 3 and 5, and similar behaviour has been observed for other HBLCs.39,40,49
Finally, the emergence of smectic behaviour seen for the mixtures is difficult to understand in terms of the proposed quantitative complexes given the solely nematogenic behaviour of 5OBA. The formation of smectic phases in conventional low molar mass mesogens is normally considered in terms of a microphase separation in which the mesogenic cores form one region while the alkyl chains constitute another. There are two major forces responsible for such a separation; energetically, the mean of the core–core and chain–chain interactions is more favourable than the mixed core–chain interaction, and entropically, the interaction between a core and a chain acts to order the chain and hence is unfavourable. Thus, the very general observation is that increasing the chain length in a given homologous series promotes smectic behaviour.50 On mixing 5OBA with BiPy, EthyBiPy, EthaBiPy, and ButBiPy however, we observe a very pronounced induction of smectic A behaviour in the 1:2 mixtures. This cannot be rationalised simply in terms of the formation of the 1:2 heterocomplex because the extension of the length of the semi-rigid core in the heterocomplex for the same terminal chain length compared with the 5OBA dimer would be expected to reduce stability of the smectic relative to the nematic phase, and quite the opposite is observed. We will return to these observations later.
These bands exhibit their strongest values in the isotropic phase and, on cooling, they undergo step-reductions at the phase transitions. More specifically, the B-bands shown by the BiPy/5OBA and EthylBiPy/5OBA mixtures, Fig. 6(a) and (b), respectively, display strong and stable values within the smectic phase, whereas for EthaBiPy/5OBA and ButBiPy/5OBA, Fig. 6(c) and (e), respectively, they decrease markedly in intensity on cooling within the liquid crystal ranges. The Fermi bands of all the samples, including PropBiPy/5OBA, Fig. 6(d), show a pronounced decrease in intensity on crystallisation.
The reduction in intensity of the OH Fermi bands on cooling may at first sight appear counter intuitive given the expectation of the enhanced formation of hydrogen bonds at lower temperatures. The considerable reduction in intensity observed in these and other IR bands in the spectra on cooling may be attributed to the strong tendency of hydrogen bonded liquid crystals to spontaneously align on polar surfaces.55–58 Such director alignment will have a particularly marked effect on bands associated either parallel or perpendicular to the molecular long axis, and may also affect the crystallisation process as appears to be the case for the XBiPy/5OBA mixtures.
The suggestion that some of the acid groups may be interacting preferentially with the surfaces implies that the heterocomplex cannot be formed quantitatively. This view is further supported by the shape of the Fermi bands seen in Fig. 6. In strongly hydrogen bonded heterocomplexes, we would expect the C-band to be more pronounced with respect to the A-band, resulting in a smoother profile of the B-region which is shifted to lower frequencies.54,59,60 However, this is not the case for the spectra of the 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA mixtures in which the B-band still displays two maxima, suggesting the presence of rather weak hydrogen bonds such as those displayed by, for example, 5OBA.52
If we now turn our attention to the carbonyl stretching region of the FT-IR spectra of the 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA mixtures shown in Fig. 7, we see a rather complex profile indicating that the CO groups are found in a broad range of chemical environments. This supports the view that the heterocomplexes are not formed quantitatively, but instead coexist in equilibria with other species, namely, cyclic and open acid dimers, free acids and, necessarily, free bipyridines, XBiPy, see Fig. 8.38–40 The strong reductions in intensity taking place at the phase transitions are, at least in part, a result of the spontaneous director alignment described earlier, and this also effects the intensities of the aromatic ring vibrations, ν ∼ 1600–1500 cm−1. In order to assess the individual carbonyl contributions arising from the species shown in Fig. 8, the 1750–1650 cm−1 region has been fitted using a sum of Gaussian peaks, see Fig. 9. The band arising from the heterocomplexes, COhet, is expected at ∼1700 cm−1,61 together with signals corresponding to monomeric (free) acids, COmon at ν ≥ 1730 cm−1; open dimers, COop at ν ∼ 1730–1680 cm−1, closed dimers, COcl at ν ∼ 1680 cm−1, and chain-like catemer aggregates, COcat at ν ≤ 1660 cm−1.52,62 In addition, we have split the COop contribution into two identical but shifted bands to account for the two types of CO groups expected in the open dimers: specifically, those participating as hydrogen bond acceptors, COopLow, or those attached to the O–H group that is hydrogen bonded, COopHigh.10
We have performed this fitting procedure for the carbonyl region for all the spectra obtained as a function of temperature for each mixture, and used the relative areas of each of the Gaussian fitting peaks, A[COi], to the total scaled band area as a measure of the relative concentration of that particular species, see Fig. 10. In doing this we scale the peak areas relative to the number of carbonyl groups in each species. Thus, the areas obtained from the free acid contribution, A[COmon], are assumed to be directly associated with the concentration of free acid. However, the relative amounts of the heterocomplex and dimeric acid species have been estimated by dividing the corresponding peak areas by 2, i.e., A[COhet]/2, A[COcl]/2, and A[COop]/2. In this analysis we have not explicitly accounted for the possible formation of 1:1 heterocomplexes shown in Fig. 8. Furthermore, we have not scaled the peak areas associated with the catemeric species and note that given these represent strands of acid molecules, we are over estimating their relative concentration in this analysis.
The space filling model, electrostatic potential isosurface and dipole moment calculated for the open and closed dimers of 5OBA are shown in Fig. 11. The closed dimer is energetically more favourable by 40.62 kJ mol−1. It is interesting to note that in the open dimer a strained six-membered ring is formed and this has not previously been suggested in schematic representations of this complex. The space filling model, electrostatic potential isosurface and dipole moment calculated for each 1:2-XBiPy/5OBA heterocomplex are shown in Fig. 12, and the estimated hydrogen bond dissociation energies are listed in Table 4. The larger dipole moment calculated for the 1:2-PropBiPy/5OBA complex arises from its bent shape and we will discuss this later. The H-bond dissociation energy calculated for the closed dimer is approximately twice that of the open dimer, and this simply reflects that in the former there are two identical hydrogen bonds and in the latter two longer and different hydrogen bonds. The hydrogen bond dissociation energies of the heterocomplexes are similar and larger than that calculated for the closed dimer formed by 5OBA.
Fig. 11 The electrostatic potential isosurface (top), space filling (middle), and ball and stick models showing the dipole moment (bottom) for the closed and open dimers of 5OBA. |
1:2 Complex | Average H atom – H-bond acceptor length in optimised structure/Å | Average H atom – H bond acceptor length in separated structure/Å | H-bond dissociation energy/kJ mol−1 |
---|---|---|---|
5OBA closed dimer | 1.672 | 4.998 | 96.06 |
5OBA open dimer | 1.833 | 5.000 | 47.29 |
1.933 | 4.739 | ||
BiPy/5OBA | 1.797 | 5.000 | 111.71 |
EthylBiPy/5OBA | 1.788 | 5.000 | 113.52 |
EthaBiPy/5OBA | 1.781 | 5.000 | 115.33 |
PropBiPy/5OBA | 1.778 | 5.000 | 116.14 |
ButBiPy/5OBA | 1.774 | 5.000 | 116.87 |
According to the data shown in Fig. 10, the heterocomplex tends to be the most prevalent species in each mixture and particularly at higher temperatures. This is consistent with the higher strength of the mixed Pyr⋯HO hydrogen bond with respect to the acid–acid hydrogen bond listed in Table 4. It is immediately apparent, however, that for all the mixtures other species are present in significant amounts over the whole temperature range studied. The variation in the concentrations of the species present are complex and change from mixture to mixture. In general, however, the concentration of closed dimers tends to increase on cooling while that of the open dimers decreases. This observation is consistent with the shape and position of the B-bands in the spectra shown in Fig. 6. In the case of 1:2-EthaBiPy/5OBA, essentially similar amounts of the heterocomplex, closed and open acid dimers and catemeric strands are seen in the smectic phase. The concentration of free acid tends to be very small in each mixture, except in the crystal phase of 1:2-PropBiPy/5OBA.
An increase in the concentration of catemer-like aggregates tends to be associated with crystallisation, and this has been related to the opening, and linking of closed dimers within a smectic structure.10 Significant concentrations of open dimers are seen in the mixtures, especially in the isotropic range. We note that the samples showing the highest transition temperatures, BiPy/5OBA and EthylBiPy/5OBA, have the largest amounts of open dimers in the smectic phase, see Fig. 10(a) and (b), and we will return to this observation later.
Finally, the behaviour of the non-mesogenic 1:2-PropBiPy/5OBA mixture appears to be qualitatively different. In addition to the increase in free acid concentration on crystallisation, noted earlier, this mixture also exhibits the highest concentration of the heterocomplex, particularly in the crystal phase, coinciding with low concentrations of acid dimers.
We have seen that the trend in the clearing temperatures of the mixtures are in accord with predictions based on comparing the structure of the corresponding heterocomplexes with those of conventional covalent low mass liquid crystals. Thus, the highest clearing temperature is observed for the mixture in which the heterocomplex possesses the most linear, rigid core, namely, EthylBiPy/5OBA, see Fig. 12, and the lowest for the PropBiPy/5OBA mixture in which the heterocomplex has a non-linear and flexible core which in fact does not show liquid crystalline behaviour. This bent shape is not immediately apparent in the perspectives shown in Fig. 12, but is highlighted in Fig. 13 which compares the molecular shapes of the 1:2 PropBiPy/5OBA and ButBiPy/5OBA heterocomplexes.
Fig. 13 Space filling models of the 1:2 heterocomplexes formed by (a) PropBiPy/5OBA and (b) ButBiPy/5OBA. |
We noted that the spread of clearing temperatures exhibited by these mixtures is much narrower than that seen for analogous covalent low molar mass liquid crystals. Presumably this reflects the high concentrations of the other species present, and in particular of the acid dimers which are common to all the mixtures. The free acid and XBiPy components do not exhibit liquid crystallinity and so will reduce the clearing temperatures of the mixtures. The absence of liquid crystalline behaviour for the PropBiPy/5OBA mixture may now be attributed, not only to the shape of the heterocomplex, but also to that of the uncomplexed PropBiPy molecules which will strongly inhibit the formation of liquid crystal phases. The rather low entropy change associated with the nematic–isotropic transition seen for the ButBiPy/5OBA mixture when compared to those observed for even-membered liquid crystal dimers63–66 is also readily explained in terms of the mixture of various hydrogen bonded and free species.
We also noted earlier that the shapes of the phase diagrams seen in Fig. 3 were also inconsistent with the assumption of the quantitative formation of the heterocomplex and that the clearing temperature was rather insensitive to the composition of the mixture over a rather broad range. This may now be accounted for in terms of the complex equilibria between a number of differing species.
The third inconsistency in attempting to account for the liquid crystalline behaviour of these systems in terms of the quantitative formation of the heterocomplex involved the strong induction of smectic behaviour seen for the mixtures. However, the presence of open dimers and catemer-like strands, see Fig. 8, stabilises the layered arrangements and hence, strongly promotes smectic phases,67,68 see Fig. 14. In a similar vein, it has been suggested recently that such lateral interactions may play an important role in stabilising the twist-bend nematic phase shown by 4-[6-(4′′-cyanobiphenyl-4-yl)hexyloxy]benzoic acid, CB6OBA,37 and the appearance of a cybotactic nematic phase that nucleates the smectic C domains of some 4-alkoxybenzoic acids.9,10,62 This is another manifestation of the “softness” of the hydrogen bond, and by extension of the supramolecular core, that allows for coexisting different configurations of supramolecular liquid crystals which stabilise the liquid crystal phase.
Fig. 14 Schematic representation of the stabilisation of the smectic phase in XBiPy/5OBA mixtures by lateral hydrogen bonding giving rise to catemeric-strands. |
Our interpretation of the carbonyl stretching region of the FT-IR spectra of the XBiPy/5OBA mixtures in terms of various hydrogen-bonded and free species has allowed us to account for the liquid crystalline behaviour of these systems. Similar approaches described in earlier studies have involved acid dimers and heterocomplexes,38–40 but to the best of our knowledge this is the first attempt to specifically include both carbonyl stretches associated with open acid dimers and has not had to assume the double minimum potential energy surface most commonly used to describe the unionised hydrogen bond between an acid and pyridyl fragments.59,61 We have also shown how lateral hydrogen bond interactions may give rise to catemer strands which in turn can stabilise smectic phases. This study now opens up new lines of investigation to relate the concentration fluctuations of these various supramolecular species to liquid crystal behaviour in symmetric and non-symmetric HBLCs, and how the lateral interactions may be utilised to tailor the structures obtained.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra17819g |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |