Tuneable luminescence and morphology of an amphiphilic platinum(II) complex via the incorporation of a cationic surfactant

Xiaorui Zheng*ab, Haiyang Wangab and Yuan Liab
aState Key Laboratory of Fluorine & Nitrogen Chemicals, Xi'an 710065, China. E-mail: zhxrui@qq.com
bXi'an Modern Chemistry Research Institute, Xi'an 710065, China

Received 3rd June 2016 , Accepted 1st September 2016

First published on 6th September 2016


Abstract

A new amphiphilic platinum(II) complex containing a quaternary ammonium group had been synthesized successfully. Of interest is that its monomer and excimer emission could be systematically controlled by the incorporation of a cationic surfactant, which led to a morphological transformation from fibers to ribbons then to sheets.


Supramolecular self-assembly, driven by various weak non-covalent interactions, provides access to a new class of materials with tunable structures and multiple functionalities.1 In the past few decades, square-planar platinum(II) complexes have drawn more and more attention due to their intriguing spectroscopic and luminescence properties.2 Meanwhile, square-planar platinum(II) complexes often tend to arrange themselves into oligomeric structures via Pt–Pt and/or π–π stacking interactions. Through controlling the above-mentioned intermolecular interactions, the spectroscopic and luminescence properties of platinum(II) complexes can be tuned purposively. Such aggregation-induced optical behaviors have resulted in many potential applications in the fields of chemical sensors and electro-optical devices.2 However, stepwise tuneable optical outputs of platinum(II) complexes have only rarely been explored.2l

On the other hand, the assembly of surfactants has immense potential for the design of nanoscale architectures. For example, surfactants have been chosen as template to prepare hollow silica particles.3a Zhang et al.3b reported the facile organization of the inorganic sandwiched heteropolytungstomolybdate K13[Eu(SiW9Mo2O39)2] into highly ordered supramolecular nanostructured materials by complexation with a series of cationic surfactants. Beaune et al.3c reported the fabrication of hybrid materials of magnetic and fluorescent vesicles based on surfactant. Fluorescence probes have been employed in structural investigations, such as fusion of surfactants vesicles3d and phase transitions. Besides, mixed surfactant solutions contain a variety of structures.4 In the previous literature,4b careful fluorescent probe investigation has shown that the phase behaviour of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) mixtures is much richer than previously appreciated.

We herein reported an amphiphilic cationic platinum(II) complex (FPtNC3) fabricated by linking (2-(4′,6′-difluorophenyl)pyridinato-N,C2′)(2,4-pentanedionato-O,O) (FPt1) with an ammonium salt group (Scheme 1). According to the previous reports,5 FPt1 had a broad excimer emission and had been widely used in the field of white organic light emitting device as a single emissive dopant, in which the doping concentration was a key parameter to control the relative ratio of monomer and excimer emission. The ancillary ligand of the complex FPtNC3 was functionalized by a dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) group, which was a very advantageous self-assembling unit due to its strong hydrophobic interactions of alkyl chains in aqueous medium4c–f and thus endowed the complex with an amphiphilic feature. Meanwhile, in order to control the luminescence of FPtNC3 efficiently, the cationic surfactant DTAB was added gradually into the aqueous solution of the complex. Interestingly, with the gradual addition of DTAB, the emission of FPtNC3 changed from weak-orange to bright-blue-green accompanied by a morphological transformation from fiber to ribbon then to sheet.


image file: c6ra14410a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Chemical structures of FPt1, FPtNC3 and DTAB.

The platinum(II) complex FPtNC3 was synthesized according to the routine shown in Scheme S1 and fully characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectra together with high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectra (Fig. S1–S10). FPtNC3 was able to dissolve in organic solvents and water, confirming that the complex was amphiphilic. The resulting aqueous solution showed a yellowish color under ambient light and emitted weak orange light under UV irradiation (Fig. 1a, 0.2 mM). The UV-vis absorbance spectra (Fig. S12) and quantum yield (2%) measurements of FPtNC3 showed similar results with FPt1 described in previous reports.5c,e


image file: c6ra14410a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Emission spectra of FPtNC3, the inner photographs show FPtNC3 under ambient light (left) and UV irradiation (right). (b and c) Fluorescent microscopic images of FPtNC3 aqueous solution. (d) Schematic representation of self-assemblied structure of FPtNC3.

Upon excitation at 385 nm, the aqueous solution showed four emission bands with comparable intensities, which were centered at 471 nm, 501 nm, 540 nm and 645 nm, respectively (Fig. 1a). According to the previous reports about FPt1 and its analogues5,6 the fore three bands originated from the monomer emission while the latter one the excimer emission. Fluorescence microscopic images showed that the complex FPtNC3 in water self-assembled into fibrous micelles with a length of several ten micrometers, which emitted weak orange light (Fig. 1c). After water evaporated, fibers disaggregated to form discrete fragment (Fig. S11).

According to previous studies of surfactants,3,4 we deduced that the amphiphilic feature of FPtNC3 played an important role in its self-assembly. In water, as a result of the solvophobic effect, the complex formed the micelle and the hydrophilic ammonium salt groups were located on the outer side of the micelle. The hydrophobic core contained platinum(II) complex squares and alkyl chains. Inside of the hydrophobic core, the platinum(II) complexes were close enough to form the excimer. During the excitation process, the excimer received energy transferred from the monomer, resulting in luminescence quenching.6 Due to the fact that the fraction of excimer was low and the energy transferred from the large part of monomers was not complete, the monomer emission and the broadband emission were observed (Fig. 1a). A possible model was presented in Fig. 1d, in which several fibrous micelles bonded together into a bigger volume fibrous aggregate.

To control energy transfer from the monomer efficiently, DTAB was added into the aqueous solution of FPtNC3. A series of FPtNC3/DTAB mixtures with different molar ratio (from 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 to 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100, listed in Table S1) were prepared by adding the concentrated aqueous solution of DTAB to FPtNC3 solution. The original concentration of FPtNC3 was maintained at 0.2 mM. The concentrations of FPtNC3 in these mixtures decreased slightly while the total concentration of ammonium salt groups increased with the gradual addition of DTAB.

Upon UV irradiation at 365 nm, these FPtNC3/DTAB mixtures indicated different emission from weak orange to bright blue-green with the increase of DTAB (Fig. S13). We thus investigated the optical properties of the above-mentioned mixtures through UV-vis absorption and luminescence measurements. When the molar ratio between FPtNC3 and DTAB ranged from 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 to 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4, the monomer emission intensities of FPtNC3 in mixtures increased slightly (Fig. 2a). Comparatively, the excimer emission intensities enhanced obviously. After that, the monomer emission enhanced dramatically with the increase of DTAB (Fig. 2a, b and d). The intensity of monomer emission reached its maximum value at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]30, which was 156 times more than that of FPtNC3 solution. Of note was that the emission quantum yield was up to 34% and much higher than that of FPtNC3 solution (2%). It was also superior to the previously reported FPt1 emitter.5 In contrast with the monomer emission, the excimer emission showed a comparative decrease in intensity (Fig. 2b), which indicated that the monomer was isolated by DATB and the formation of excimer was interrupted partially. Upon successive addition of DATB, the intensity of monomer emission started to decrease dramatically (Fig. 2c and d). When the ratio was 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100, the intensity of monomer emission was 15 times than that of FPtNC3 solution. These results indicated that the incorporation of DTAB made FPtNC3 monomer isolated and thus prevented the formation of excimer. As a result, the energy transfer of monomer became impossible and the monomer emission enhanced efficiently. The same tendency has been confirmed by UV-vis absorbance spectra (Fig. S12).


image file: c6ra14410a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Emission spectra of FPtNC3/DTAB mixtures in water (λexc = 385 nm). (a) Emission spectra of the mixtures at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0–1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]10. (b) Emission spectra of the mixtures at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]0 to 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]30. (c) Emission spectra of the mixtures at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]30 to 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100. (d) Emission intensities of the mixtures at 466 nm.

As above-mentioned description, FPtNC3 could self-assemble into orange fibers in water due to solvophobic effect. Accordingly, we asked whether the incorporation of DTAB would influence the stacking of FPtNC3 and the FPtNC3/DTAB mixtures form new ordered nanostructures. Fluorescence microscope measurement was firstly employed to investigate the aggregates. Fluorescence microscopic images revealed that the FPtNC3/DTAB mixtures at the ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 and 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2 still formed orange fibers (Fig. S14). Upon successive addition of DTAB, the orange fibers and bright blue-green ribbons were found at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]10 and 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]20 (Fig. S15). The content of blue-green ribbons increased with the increase of DTAB, while the ratio of the orange fibers reduced. This situation agreed well with the luminescence change as shown in Fig. 2. In the following fluorescent micrograph images (Fig. 3a and S15), only blue-green ribbons were observed at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]30 to 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]50. The ribbons were close to the length of several hundred micrometers. Some ribbons aggregated to form star-shaped structures with a diameter of ca. 400 μm, which emitted intense monomer luminescence (Fig. 3a). After the water was evaporated, the ribbons still showed the same blue-green emission (Fig. S16), demonstrating that the solvent evaporation process did not change the luminescent color and aggregate structure formed in water. These results confirmed that the blue-green ribbons were stabilized. In addition, the average thickness of the ribbons were determined to be ca. 55 nm (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]30), 70 nm (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]40) and 85 nm (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]50) and the average width were ca. 300 nm (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]30), 320 nm (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]40) and 370 nm (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]50) through SEM and TEM measurements (Fig. 3c, 4 and S18), respectively. Overall, with the concentration of DTAB increasing, the ribbons became wider and thicker. Besides, the random helical ribbons were observed by SEM and TEM images (Fig. S20).


image file: c6ra14410a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Fluorescence microscopic images and SEM images of FPtNC3/DTAB mixtures at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]30 (a and c) and 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]70 (b and d).

image file: c6ra14410a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 TEM images of FPtNC3/DTAB mixture systems in ribbons (a) and sheets (b).

Subsequently, with the increase of DTAB, these mixtures aggregated to form bright blue-green sheets at the molar ratio range of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]60–1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100, as shown in Fig. 3d and S15. The luminescence and structure did not change after the water was evaporated (Fig. S17), which confirmed that the blue-green sheets were also stabilized. SEM (Fig. 3d) and TEM images (Fig. 5) showed that the sheets were multiple-layer nanostructures. The dimension of sheets was broadening gradually with the increase of DTAB. The average dimension was ca. 35 × 15 μm2 at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]60 and 80 × 40 μm2 at the molar ratio of 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100, respectively. Interestingly, the interior angle of the sheets was always 60°.


image file: c6ra14410a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (a) TEM images of FPtNC3/DTAB mixture systems in the sheets. (b and c) The enlarged images of molecule array.

It was noted that TEM images (Fig. 5) revealed the molecule packing style of sheets clearly. The line spacing constant of molecular arrays was found to be 0.37 nm (Fig. 5b), which was consistent with the diameter of trimethylammonium group (calculated 0.35 nm). Considering the similar molecule structures of DTAB and FPtNC3, we deduced that the single sheet was consisted of the interdigitated bilayer structure. The crystalline state was formed by surfactants through head to head and tail to tail aggregation, which acquired stable molecular packing by inserting its alkyl chains orderly from both sides of the bilayer. The carbon chains were oriented in parallel to each other and perpendicular to the plane of the layer. The hydrophilic moieties were in the crystalline state, which included a trimethylammonium group and a bromide ion. Moreover, the two molecular arrays between the adjacent bilayers, formed an orientation angle in Fig. 5c. The orientation angle was almost consistent with the interior angle observed in the above microscope images. A possible model was presented in Fig. 6.


image file: c6ra14410a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Schematic representation of a model of the layered aggregation of FPtNC3/DTAB mixtures.

In the previous work,4a,b the lamellar sheets had been found in some of aqueous cationic systems. Lamellar sheets had also been observed in the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/DTAB/D2O system when the overall surfactant concentration is increased.4e Previous study4d for the DTAB/water self-assembly system showed that hydrated crystals DTAB occurred at a higher concentrations (>90 wt%) than the total amount of the surfactants range between 78.4% and 85.2% (listed in Table S1). Hence, the formation of sheets was caused by the nature of DTAB mostly and the dual effect of DTAB and FPtNC3 could not be neglected.

It was apparent that the platinum(II) complex square was limited in the hydrophobic regions of high ordered ribbons and sheets and was isolated by the alkyl chains of DTAB, resulting in the enhancement of monomer emission and the disappearance of excimers. According to the previous literature,6e the formation of excimers resulted in the luminescence self-quenching. Hence, the disappearance of excimers led to the efficient monomer emission. Meanwhile, due to the higher percentage of DTAB in sheets, FPtNC3 was diluted by DTAB significantly, resulting in a relative weaker emission than that of ribbons.

In summary, we have demonstrated that the incorporation of DTAB into the amphiphilic platinum(II) complex FPtNC3 could tune the spectroscopic and luminescence properties of complex efficiently. Besides this, the aggregate structures of the mixtures transformed from fibres to ribbons then to sheets with the successive addition of DTAB. Such approach will provide a facile prepared strategy to develop luminescent materials for potential applications in optoelectronics and solid state lighting.

Notes and references

  1. (a) K. Kinbara and T. Aida, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 1377 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) L. C. Palmer and S. I. Stupp, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1674 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) H.-J. Kim, T. Kim and M. Lee, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 72 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) J. Bae, J.-H. Choi, Y.-S. Yoo, N.-K. Oh, B.-S. Kim and M. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 9668 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) Y. Tidhar, H. Weissman, S. G. Wolf, A. Gulino and B. Rybtchinski, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 6068 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. (a) M.-Y. Yuen, V. A. L. Roy, W. Lu, S. C. F. Kui, G. S. M. Tong, M.-H. So, S. S.-Y. Chui, M. Muccini, J. Q. Ning, S. J. Xu and C.-M. Che, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 9895 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) K. M.-C. Wong and V. W.-W. Yam, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 424 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) K. M.-C. Wong, M. M.-Y. Chan and V. W.-W. Yam, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 5558 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) I. Eryazici, C. N. Moorefield and G. R. Newkome, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 1834 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. D. Cummings, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2009, 253, 449 CrossRef CAS; (f) R. McGuire Jr, M. C. McGuire and D. R. McMillin, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 2574 CrossRef; (g) J. Kalinowski, V. Fattori, M. Cocchi and J. A. G. Williams, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2011, 255, 2401 CrossRef CAS; (h) K. M. C. Wong and V. W.-W. Yam, Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 424 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) T. J. Wadas, Q.-M. Wang, Y.-j. Kim, C. Flaschenreim, T. N. Blanton and R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 16841 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (j) L. J. Grove, J. M. Rennekamp, H. Jude and W. B. Connick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1594 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (k) D. R. McMillin and J. J. Moore, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 229, 113 CrossRef CAS; (l) C. Po, A. Y.-Y. Tam, K. M.-C. Wong and V. W.-W. Yam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 12136 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. (a) L. Zhang, P. Li, X. Liu, L. Du and E. Wang, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 4279 CrossRef CAS; (b) T. Zhang, C. Spitz, M. Antonietti and C. F. J. Faul, Chem.–Eur. J., 2005, 11, 1001 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) G. Beaune, B. Dubertret, O. Clément, C. Vayssettes, V. Cabuil and C. Ménager, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 5421 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) B. C. R. Guillaume, D. Yogev and J. H. Fendler, J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 7489 CrossRef CAS.
  4. (a) K. M. Lusvardi, A. P. Full and E. W. Kaler, Langmuir, 1995, 11, 487 CrossRef CAS; (b) T. Kodama, A. Ohta, K. Toda, T. Katada, T. Asakawa and S. Miyagishi, Colloids Surf., A, 2006, 277, 20 CrossRef CAS; (c) E. W. Kaler, K. L. Herrington, A. K. Murthy and J. A. N. Zasadzinski, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 6698 CrossRef CAS; (d) Y. Kondo, H. Uchiyama, N. Yoshino, K. Nishiyama and M. Abe, Langmuir, 1995, 11, 2380 CrossRef CAS; (e) M. Bergström and J. S. Pedersen, Langmuir, 1998, 14, 3754 CrossRef; (f) K. M. McGrath, Langmuir, 1995, 11, 1835 CrossRef CAS; (g) E. Rodenas, C. Dolcet, M. Valiente and E. C. Valeront, Langmuir, 1994, 10, 2088 CrossRef CAS; (h) J. Jin, J. Huang and I. Ichinose, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 4532 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. (a) J. Brooks, Y. Babayan, S. Lamansky, P. I. Djurovich, I. Tsyba, R. Bau and M. E. Thompson, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 3055 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) V. Adamovich, J. Brooks, A. Tamayo, A. M. Alexander, P. I. Djurovich, B. W. D'Andrade, C. Adachi, S. R. Forrest and M. E. Thompson, New J. Chem., 2002, 26, 1171 RSC; (c) E. L. Williams, K. Haavisto, J. Li and G. E. Jabbour, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 197 CrossRef CAS; (d) X. H. Yang, Z. X. Wang, S. Madakuni, J. Li and G. E. Jabbour, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 2405 CrossRef CAS; (e) A. F. Rausch, L. Murphy, J. A. Gareth Williams and H. Yersin, Inorg. Chem., 2012, 51, 312 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. (a) H. Z. Xie, M. W. Liu, Q. Y. Wang, X. H. Zang, C. S. Lee, L. S. Hung, S. T. Lee, P. E. Teng, H. L. Kwong, H. Zheng and C. M. Che, Adv. Mater., 2001, 13, 1245 CrossRef CAS; (b) Y. Wang, N. Herron, V. V. Grushin, D. LeCloux and V. Petrov, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2001, 79, 449 CrossRef CAS; (c) B. Maa, P. I. Djurovich and M. E. Thompsona, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2005, 249, 1501 CrossRef; (d) D. Kim and J.-L. Brédas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 11371 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) C.-H. Chen, F.-I. Wu, Y.-Y. Tsai and C.-H. Cheng, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, 21, 3150 CrossRef CAS; (f) J. Han, L. Shen, X. Chen and W. Fang, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 4227 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis and characterization details of all compounds, additional fluorescent micrograph, SEM and TEM images. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra14410a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.