Ying Duan,
Ye Chen*,
Qing Wen* and
Tigang Duan
Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials and Surface Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 15001, Heilongjiang, China. E-mail: chenye@hrbeu.edu.cn; wenqing@hrbeu.edu.cn; Tel: +86-13059004260 Tel: +86-13039978811
First published on 11th May 2016
We have developed a simple and effective way to fabricate Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrodes by electrodeposition from a dimethyl sulfoxide solution. The electrode surface exhibits a distinct cauliflower-like structure with a small grain size. Its electrochemical properties have been evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and accelerated service life tests; furthermore, the results were compared with those obtained for an electrode prepared from aqueous solution. The DMSO-prepared electrode has low charge transfer resistance (22.71 vs. 107.60 Ω) and high stability (59.3 vs. 2.8 h). Moreover, its ability to electrochemically decolorize methyl orange and rhodamine B is greatly improved.
Many attempts have been made to overcome these disadvantages. The addition of rare earths and noble metals, such as Ru, Au, and Pt into the Sb–SnO2 coating can increase the service life of the electrodes, but the electrocatalytic ability is decreased.15–17 Another method is the modification of the Ti substrate; that is, the formation of TiO2 nanotubes.5 TiO2 nanotube interlayers can improve the stability of the electrode without decreasing its electrochemical ability, but because it requires more stringent laboratory-conditions, this has been only realized at the laboratory scale.
As an alternative to aqueous solutions, electrodeposition in organic media can address the aforementioned issues. Therefore, we prepared a Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrode by electrodeposition using a dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solution containing metal chlorides. DMSO is a common polar aprotic organic solvent that has been successfully employed for the electrochemical growth of Ag2Se, ZnO and CdO films.18–21 The results showed that these films revealed a good adhesion to the substrate and also high quality microstructure. And due to the non-aqueous solvent in the synthesis, there was only one phase on the films without the presence of other phases. However, there have been no reports of the preparation of Sb–SnO2 films in DMSO solution for use as DSAs to treat wastewater.
In this work, a Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrode was successfully prepared by electrodeposition in a DMSO solution (referred to as Ti/Sb–SnO2(D)). The Sb–SnO2 films with dense and cauliflower-like structures were used as electrodes and are thought to not only enhance the adhesion of coatings on the Ti substrate but also provide a large active surface area for electrocatalytic oxidation processes.
Meanwhile, an electrode was also prepared in an aqueous solution as a control; this is referred to as Ti/Sb–SnO2(A). The required reagents for this method have been reported previously,22 and the same electrodeposition and heat treatment processes were used as those described for the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode.
The EIS measurements were performed in the frequency range from 104 to 10−1 Hz at a potential of 1.9 V (vs. SCE) with signal amplitude of 5 mV. Accelerated service life tests were performed using chronopotentiometry with an anode density of 100 mA cm−2. The potential of the anode was recorded as a function of time, and it was defined that the electrode was deactivated when the potential increased 5 V from its initial value.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 SEM images of the Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrodes prepared in (a and b) aqueous and (c and d) DMSO solutions; XRD patterns of the Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrodes prepared in different solutions. |
XRD analysis was applied to study the crystalline properties of SnO2 films. As shown in Fig. 1(e), the two electrodes have similar XRD spectra. In addition to the sharp peaks related to the Ti support, all the diffraction peaks of the electrodes can be indexed as standard cassiterite SnO2. Compared with Ti/Sb–SnO2(A), the SnO2 surface synthesized in DMSO solution has more intense reflections with wider half-peak width, suggesting that a more crystalline surface composed of smaller SnO2 crystallites was obtained from deposition in organic solvent. The grain size of the SnO2 crystallites were estimated using the Scherrer-equation and were found to be approximately 48 nm and 28 nm for Ti/Sb–SnO2(A) and Ti/Sb–SnO2(D), respectively. This result indicates that the DMSO system had a grain refinement effect on SnO2. Smaller crystallites are considered favorable to enhance the electrocatalytic ability; therefore, the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode is expected to have a good electrochemical degradation ability.
Fig. 2(a) illustrates the preparation of the Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrodes. For the Ti/Sb–SnO2(A), the prepared coating contained hydrogen, leading to many holes on the electrode surface; these greatly influenced the binding force between the metal coating and the Ti substrate. The structure of the coatings is determined by their composition. In the case of the organic system, DMSO molecules partially decomposed during electrodeposition and the decomposition products (probably dimethyl sulfide (CH3–S–CH3) and sulfur molecules12) were subsequently incorporated into the deposit, promoting SnO2 grain refinement. Fig. 2(b) and (c) are the EDS results of Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode before and after heat treatment, and it can be seen that there was a small amount of sulfur (7.18 at%) on the electrode surface before heat treatment. After calcination, the sulfur was oxidized into gas oxide and it can't detect the peak of S element in the EDS image.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 (a) Schematic illustration for the preparation of Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrodes; EDS results of Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode (b) before heat treatment and (c) after heat treatment. |
During the electrodeposition process, the reactions on the Ti plate surface (cathode) were expressed as follows:
Sn2+ + 2e− → Sn | (1) |
Sb3+ + 3e− → Sb | (2) |
The metal ions were reduced to the metals deposited on the electrode surface. After heat treatment of 600 °C, the Sn and Sb metals are oxidized to metal oxides, leading to the increase of O element content in the surface of the electrode. Besides, the atom ratio of O/Sn was 1.60, not equal to 2, it was because the doping of Sb made a change of the oxygen vacancy distribution in the SnO2 crystal, and caused the lattice distortion.24 The nSb/nSn was 0.18, which was larger than the ratio of nSb/nSn in the electrodeposition solution (0.09), indicating that Sb was enriched.22
EIS and accelerated service life tests were performed to investigate the electrochemical performance and stability of the electrodes. As shown in Fig. 3(a), similar profiles were observed for the two kinds of electrodes. The Nyquist plots indicate resistance at high frequency and a depressed capacitive-resistive semicircular shape in the middle-low frequency. To simulate the EIS data, the equivalent circuit model was used to fit the EIS behavior. In this model, R1 represents the solution resistance, R2 is the charge transfer resistance and CPE2 is the constant phase element, which is parallel to the R2. The charge transfer resistance represents the electrochemical discharge process, and we were able to measure the electrochemical performance of the electrode. The EIS analysis result is shown in Table 1, and it was found that the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode had a smaller R2, only 22.71 Ω, less than a quarter of that of the Ti/Sb–SnO2(A). This result indicates good electron-transfer capability and high conductivity of the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D). Fig. 3(b) shows the result of the accelerated service life tests. For the Tb/Sb–SnO2(A), at high current density, the electrode was deactivated after 2.8 h following extreme oxygen evolution and an increasing potential. In contrast, the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode prolonged the accelerated service lifetime to 59.3 h, 21.2 times longer than that of the Ti/Sb–SnO2(A) electrode. Meanwhile, the electrode prepared in DMSO solution also had a lower initial electrode potential, indicating that the electrical conductivity increased.
Electrode | Electrolyte | Current density | Accelerated life | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
TiO2-NTs/SnO2–Sb2O5 | 0.1 M Na2SO4 | 100 mA cm−2 | 42 h | 26 |
Ti/SnO2–Sb2O4–CNT | 1 M H2SO4 | 100 mA cm−2 | 4.31 h | 23 |
Ti/Sb–SnO2–TiN | 0.25 M Na2SO4 | 100 mA cm−2 | 5.22 h | 14 |
Ti/Sb–SnO2-(c)PED | 0.25 M Na2SO4 | 100 mA cm−2 | 22.12 h | 22 |
Ti/Sb–SnO2 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 100 mA cm−2 | 38.32 h | 4 |
Ti/Sb–SnO2(A) | 0.25 M Na2SO4 | 100 mA cm−2 | 2.80 h | This work |
Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) | 0.25 M Na2SO4 | 100 mA cm−2 | 59.30 h | This work |
Besides, Table 1 presents the accelerated life comparison of different Ti-based Sb–SnO2 electrodes which have been reported. It can be seen that the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode has a relative long accelerated service lifetime under similar experimental condition. The real service life of the electrodes will be much longer than the accelerated service life because of the much lower current density used in practical applications.
There are many reasons for the deactivation of the electrodes, such as metal base passivation, coating detachment, coating consumption, and mechanical damage.25 Fig. 3(c) and (d) show the SEM and EDS images of the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode after stability testing. We found that most of the electrode surface was still covered with metal oxide, and no exposure to the titanium substrate was detected. EDS was used to measure the elemental concentrations for the electrode before and after stability testing. The EDS results indicate that the deactivation of Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) was due to consumption of the coating, rather than coating detachment leading to exposure of the Ti substrate.
Two types of dyes, an azo dye (MO) and azo-free dye (RhB) were chosen as the targets for decolorization tests to investigate the electrocatalytic activity of the Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrodes. As Fig. 4 shows, a sharp decrease in both MO and RhB concentration occurred with the use of both types of electrodes; however, dye removal was faster on the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D). For Ti/Sb–SnO2(D), within 1 h of electrolysis, MO was almost completely electrochemically decolorize. In contrast, only 76% was decolorized using the aqueous-prepared electrode. After 2 h electrolysis, the MO removal rates were 100% and 86% for Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) and Ti/Sb–SnO2(A), respectively, and the values for RhB removal were 97% and 83%, respectively. The insets of Fig. 4 show the semi-log relationship of MO and RhB concentrations with electrolysis time. The electrochemical decolorization of both dyes was found to follow pseudo-first order reaction kinetics, and the first order kinetic constants are shown in Table 2. The results showed that the target pollutants were removed most rapidly when using the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 Electrochemical decolorization of MO (a) and RhB (b) on Ti/Sb–SnO2 electrodes. The insets show the corresponding kinetic analysis associated with the pseudo-first order reaction kinetics. |
Ti/Sb–SnO2(A) | Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) | ||
---|---|---|---|
R2/Ω | 107.60 | 22.71 | |
Kinetic constants/min−1 | MO | 0.01651 | 0.06257 |
RhB | 0.01508 | 0.02589 |
In order to investigate the durability of electrode, we made reusability tests on electrocatalytic decolorization of methyl orange and rhodamine B, that is, reuse the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrodes after first electrochemical decolorization tests and redo the decolorization tests in the new dye solutions. Fig. 5 shows the electrochemical docolorization efficiency changes with the electrode use time. The durability results show that, after 5 times decolorization, the electrochemical decolorization efficiencies for MO and RhB are still higher than 99% and 96%, respectively. This indicates that the electrodes prepared in the DMSO solution have a high stability and good electrochemical decolorization ability.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 Decolorization efficiency changes with the electrode use time on the Ti/Sb–SnO2(D) electrode. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |