Munir Ashrafb,
Farida Irshadab,
Jawairia Umar*ab,
Assad Farooqa and
Mohammad Azeem Ashrafa
aDepartment of Fibre and Textile Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. E-mail: jiaumar@gmail.com; Jawairia.umar@uaf.edu.pk
bDepartment of Textile Processing, National Textile University, Sheikhupura Road, Faisalabad (37610), Pakistan
First published on 9th August 2016
Textile processing is an energy intensive process, which contributes about 15–20% of the cost of the finished product. The inefficient equipment and the non-optimized processes are the major causes of the energy losses. The most energy intensive process during wet processing is the curing. Conventionally curing/cross linking of resin is done at a high temperature of about 170 °C. In this research work, ZnO nanoparticles were used in the curing process with the aim to replace the conventional catalyst and to decrease the curing temperature and thermal curing time. The curing of resins was carried out using three different techniques i.e. thermal radiation, UV radiation and a combination of thermal & UV radiation. Promising results have been achieved.
To overcome this problem two approaches have been used by the researchers to reduce the swelling of cellulosic fabrics.3 One way is to close the pores of the cotton fibres by incorporating polymerized finish to prevent the entry of water molecules.4 This approach has the drawback as it clogs the fabric pores and deteriorate the breathability of the fabric, hence making it uncomfortable. The second and commercially used approach is the fixing of adjacent hydroxyl groups of the cellulose with multifunctional cross linkers called crease recovery finishes mostly resins which inhibit the swelling of fibres.
Resins are the bi-functional chemicals by nature, which form a crosslinking reaction with the hydroxyl groups of the cellulose and hinder the movement of cellulosic chains.5,6 Dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea (DMDHEU) is widely used resin which is synthesized by the reaction of urea, glyoxal and formaldehyde. In DMDHEU the N-methylol groups create bonds with the –OH groups of the cellulose.7,8 Maleic anhydride is another versatile chemical which is used to produce the lube oil additives, alkyl resins and unsaturated polyester resins.9
In resin finishing, catalyst is necessary to activate the crosslinking reaction and the most commonly used catalyst is MgCl2, which is an acid liberating salt that allows the reaction to be carried out within 130–180 °C temperature range.10 MgCl2 requires high temperature to crosslink the resin, hence requires high energy consumption. To combat this problem nanoparticles were used as catalyst for resin curing.
Nanoparticles of metals and metal oxides such as silver, zinc oxide & titanium dioxide have been used as antimicrobial agents for textiles with significant durability to washing.11 The use of textile inorganic UV blockers in the form of nanoparticles e.g. ZnO and TiO2 has also increased as compared to organic UV blockers because they are not toxic to environment and stable at high temperature and UV exposure. Moreover the nanoparticles offer greater surface area to volume ratio due to which their ability to block UV radiations is more than that of bulk materials and the effect produced by them is more durable. Other properties of the fabric which are affected by nano finishing are tensile strength, dye-ability, bursting strength, comfort, bending properties and frictional properties.12,13
In this backdrop, the present research work was planned to use zinc oxide nanoparticles for curing of crease recovery finish to minimize the amount of catalyst (MgCl2 and NaH2PO4) and to make the process economical. Moreover, the efforts will be made to replace thermal curing with UV curing, which is less costly by the use of ZnO nanoparticles.14,15
| Resin type | Resin conc. | Catalyst | Curing technique |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMDHEU | 5% | MgCl2 | Thermal |
| UV | |||
| 10% | MgCl2 + ZnO | Thermal & UV | |
| Maleic anhydride | 5% | NaH2PO4 | Thermal |
| UV | |||
| 10% | NaH2PO4 + ZnO | Thermal & UV |
The morphology of treated fabric was characterized by scanning electron microscope (HITACHI S-3500N). As samples were no conducting, therefore, they were metalized with ultrathin coating of gold in order to avoid the accumulation of static charges on surface and to obtain high resolution images. Crease recovery of the samples was tested on Shirley crease recovery tester using standard test method BS 3086-1972.16 The tear strength testing was performed using Elmendorf tear strength tester both in warp and weft direction, according to ASTM D 1424-09 (2013).17 A UV resistance test was also conducted using CAMSPEC 4550 UV visible spectrophotometer. UPF values of the samples were calculated according to AATCC 183. UPF stands for the term ultraviolet protection factor, the term that is used to express the amount of protection from ultraviolet rays provided to the wearer by the fabric. Another term used for this is SPF i.e. the Sun Protection Factor.18
Fig. 3 and 4 shows the results of crease recovery of fabric with and without ZnO particles with three different curing techniques. It can be seen that the best results are obtained using 10% resin concentration in combination with ZnO nanoparticles and MgCl2.
While comparing three different curing techniques, it can be seen that the best results are obtained by thermal curing in weft direction and by UV curing in warp direction. On UV activation, the electron present in the valence band jumps to conduction band of ZnO leaving a positive whole behind. This positive whole moves toward surface of nanoparticles and act a proton. It catalyzes the reaction between maleic anhydride and cellulose according to mechanism as proposed in Scheme 1. It has been reported in previous studies that photocatalysts enhanced the crease recovery angle of DMDHEU due to increased cross linking.20
![]() | ||
| Scheme 1 Mechanism of reaction between maleic anhydride and cellulose in the presence of photoactivated ZnO. | ||
On comparing the two resins it can be seen that DMDHEU showed better crease recovery angle than maleic anhydride. It is due to high reactivity of N-methylol groups of DMDHEU. These groups not only react with hydroxyl groups of cellulose but also undergo self-cross linking making a three dimensional network on fiber surface.2 However, maleic anhydride does not undergo self-cross linking. It makes ester linkages only with the hydroxyl groups of cellulose. Due to extensive cross linking of DMDHEU, the fabric treated with it shows higher crease recovery angle.
From Fig. 6, the same trend is visible with the increase in the resin concentration. This decrease can be attributed to the fact that during fabric tear, the yarns used to displace from their position and form yarn bunch against the tearing force. However, crosslinking with resin reduces the mobility of yarns thus reducing the bunching effect. Thus tear strength is reduced. However, this decrease can be compensated by decreasing the concentration of MgCl2 and increasing ZnO nanoparticles.
While comparing the curing technique, the minimum tear strength value is resulted from thermal curing in weft and with UV curing in warp direction with 10% resin and ZnO nanoparticles.
The results of maleic anhydride on tear strength can be observed from Fig. 7. Lowest value of tear strength can be seen with 10% resin concentration. This decrease in tear strength value is attributed to the fact that the penetration of resin into interior of fabric reduces the internal plasticization of chains and imparts stiffness. Hence, chain slippage decreases due to which the tear strength decreases.
From Fig. 9 and 10 in both trials of samples treated with DMDHEU or maleic anhydride resin ZnO nanoparticles has increased the ultraviolet protection of fabric, but the effect is stronger with DMDHEU. The higher values of UPF is obtained at 5% concentration of finish with ZnO nanoparticles as catalyst by UV curing technique. On further increase in finish concentration impaired the UV blocking property of the fabric. Although the results obtained are not comparable with the internationally standard values marked for excellent UV protection fabric, these values confirmed the UV protection property of ZnO nanoparticles on cotton fabric.21 UPF can further be enhanced by process optimisation and controlling other factors required for ultimate UV shielding in fabric.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |