Lili Yangab,
Jinming Zhanga,
Jiasong Hea,
Jun Zhang*a and
Zhihua Gan*c
aBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, CAS Key Laboratory of Engineering Plastics, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100190, China. E-mail: jzhang@iccas.ac.cn
bState Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
cState Key Laboratory of Organic–Inorganic Composites, Beijing Laboratory of Biomaterials, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China. E-mail: zhgan@mail.buct.edu.cn
First published on 1st February 2016
Porous microspheres of cellulose-graft-poly(L-lactide) (cellulose-g-PLLA) copolymers were fabricated by a water/oil/water (W/O/W) emulsion evaporation method. Their morphology, hydrophilicity and amount of hydroxyl group content (–OH content) on the surface were adjustable with the change of molar substitution of PLLA (MSPLLA). After a hydrolysis post-processing, surface physical properties of microspheres were regulated further. The influence of physical properties of microspheres on cell cultivation was investigated by setting hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line (HepG-2) as the example. Compared with the cells on PLLA microspheres, HepG-2 cells with more pseudopods spread well on the surface of cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres. Particularly, the cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres with MSPLLA of 11.5 were the most appropriate candidate for cell adhesion and proliferation. Therefore, a moderate PLLA content of cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers was beneficial to the cell cultivation. This work indicated that combining cellulose with PLLA was an available route to developing cellulose-based materials for cell cultivation.
Natural polymers have been widely used for biomedical applications because of their good biocompatibility. Microspheres which are fabricated by natural polymers, such as collagen,4 gelatin,5 alginate6 and chitosan,7 are often formulated via water-based solutions. Cellulose, which is the most abundant natural polysaccharide, has also been widely applied in biomedical fields such as wound closure and healing,8 drug delivery,9 vascular grafting and tissue engineering. However, cellulose is insoluble in water and common organic solvents owing to the vast intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonds. Moreover, it usually requires material soluble in water or organic solvents to fabricate microspheres via common methods including emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation, polymer extrusion, spray-drying and coacervation or precipitation.10 Obviously, it is impossible to prepare cellulose-based microspheres via the normal techniques. Although the ionic liquids (ILs) such as AmimCl11 is able to dissolve cellulose, it is hard to be used to fabricate cellulose-based microspheres due to its non-volatility and high viscosity. However, in consideration of the abundant hydroxyl groups of cellulose which are the useful sites of further functionalization for protein adsorption and promoting cell attachment, it would be of great interest to fabricate microspheres of cellulose-based polymers by a facile technique.
The synthetic aliphatic polyesters such as PLA have been widely utilized to fabricate microspheres12,13 via emulsion solvent evaporation method. However, the application of these polyesters is limited by their surface and bulk properties, such as hydrophobicity, lack of cell recognition sites. To overcome these shortcomings, the hydrolysis as a common chemical way has been applied to endow PLLA with hydrophilicity.14,15 During this process, carboxyl and hydroxyl groups can be created on the surface of the microspheres due to the break of ester bond of polyester chains. By controlling the degree of hydrolysis, the physical and chemical properties of microspheres including size, surface morphology,16 surface energy,17 chemical composition,18 hydrophilicity19 and charge20 can be well controlled, which show great influence on cell attachment and growth on those microspheres.
In consideration of the good solubility of synthetic aliphatic polyesters in common organic solvents, the modification of cellulose via copolymerization with aliphatic polyesters has attracted great interests in order to increase the solubility and processability of cellulose.21,22 The cellulose-graft-poly(L-lactide) (cellulose-g-PLLA) has been widely studied in our research group.23,24 Not only the mechanical properties but also the solubility in common organic solvents has been improved substantially for cellulose. Furthermore, cellulose in the copolymers can enhance the wettability of PLLA, which might benefit the attachment and proliferation of cells. Therefore, the successful synthesis of cellulose-g-PLLA copolymer and its solubility in organic solvents make it possible to fabricate cellulose-based microspheres via a emulsion solvent evaporation technique.
Although much effort has been made to develop new materials for the fabrication of microspheres, to our knowledge, there are seldom literature reported about the fabrication of microspheres by using cellulose so far.25 Herein, based on our previous work that the modification of cellulose by grafting PLLA can increase the solubility of cellulose in dichloromethane,26 we reported the fabrication of microspheres by using cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers via water/oil/water (W/O/W) emulsion solvent evaporation technique. After then, the surface properties of the microspheres were changed by the controlled hydrolysis in alkali aqueous solution. Finally, the influence of surface morphology and property on the morphology, attachment and proliferation of cells on microspheres was investigated in details.
Hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line (HepG-2) was supplied by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College. Dulbecco's modified eagle's medium (DMEM), phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin–streptomycin were obtained from Hyclone (USA). Fluorescein diacetate (FDA), propidium iodide (PI) and cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (USA).
For hydrolysis, a certain amount of microspheres was immersed into NaOH aqueous solution (10 mL, 0.05 w/v%). After 1 h, the alkali solution was removed and the microspheres were rinsed thoroughly by a large amount of distilled water until a constant pH 7.0 was reached.
Cell morphology was observed by SEM. The microspheres dispersed in 50 μL water were placed into a 96-well plate and the water was removed afterwards. Then 200 μL HepG-2 cell suspension was added into the wells (1 × 105 cells per well). After incubation at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 1 day, the samples were fixed with 1 mL glutaraldehyde for one night at 4 °C. Subsequently the samples were washed with PBS for three times and dehydrated with 40%, 50% and 60% ethanol solution for 1 minute in turn. The microspheres were dried by lyophilization.
The cell density was observed by fluorescence microscopy. The microspheres dispersed in 50 μL water were added into a 96-well plate. 200 μL HepG-2 cells were seeded in the wells (5 × 104 cells per well). The cell-seeded microspheres were replenished with fresh medium every day. The cells were harvested at 37 °C and 5% CO2 on 1, 3, 5 day respectively. The culture medium was aspirated and the samples were washed with PBS. After then, FDA/PI solution (50 μL) was added into the wells. After 3 min, the solution was removed and the samples were washed with PBS later.
The cell viability was assayed by CCK-8 reagent. After the microspheres in 50 μL water were added into a 96-well plate above all respectively, the 200 μL culture medium containing HepG-2 cells was added into the wells at a density of 2 × 103 cells per well. Each kind of microspheres was repeated for six times. As controls, the cells with only 200 μL culture medium were measured. The cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 1, 3, 5 days respectively. After incubation, 20 μL CCK-8 was filled into each well and then the samples were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 2 hours. 100 μL liquid was drawn to a new plate and the plate was read with a spectrophotometer to detect the absorbance of the samples at wavelength of 450 nm which reflects the number of viable cells. The cell viability was calculated according to the following equation:
Cell viability (%) = (Asample/Acontrol) × 100% |
For contact angle measurement, the surface wettability was measured on a Dataphysics OCA20 contact-angle system at ambient temperature. The average contact angle was obtained by measuring more than five different positions of the same sample.
For SEM measurement, the shape and morphology of microspheres were observed by JSM-6700F scanning electron microscopy. The specimens were sputter coated with platinum by Bal Tec before the observation.
For fluorescence microscopy, the fluorescence photographs of viable and dead cells adhered on microspheres were acquired by Nikon eclipse Ti.
For spectrophotometer, the viability of HepG-2 cells on microspheres was measured by Thermo Multiskan MK3. The wavelength was set at 450 nm.
Fig. 1 shows the 1H NMR spectra of cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers. The chemical shifts at 5.14 and 1.45 ppm were attributed to methine protons and methyl protons of internal lactyl respectively, which are also the characteristic peaks of PLLA. Compared with neat PLLA, the chemical shifts at 4.19 and 1.27 ppm were assigned to methine protons and methyl protons of terminal lactyl. Besides, the signal peaks in the range from 2.80 to 5.00 ppm except for the peak belonged to methine protons (4.19 ppm) are the characteristic peaks of the protons of cellulose backbone chains. The above observation clearly reveals that PLLA has been grafted onto cellulose successfully.
Sample | MSPLLAb | MStc | Grafting content (%) | Solubility | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water | DCM | DMSO | ||||
a +: soluble; −: insoluble; ±: swollen.b MSPLLA: molar substitution of PLLA, which is defined as the average number of introduced LA units per anhydroglucose residue of cellulose, and calculated from 1H NMR.c MSt: molar substitution of PLLA in theory. | ||||||
Cellulose-g-PLLA2.9 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 56.3 | + | − | + |
Cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 | 6.7 | 8.0 | 77.2 | − | ± | + |
Cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 | 11.5 | 16.0 | 85.4 | − | + | + |
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 XRD spectra of microspheres. (a)–(c) are the microspheres composed of cellulose-g-PLLA6.7, cellulose-g-PLLA11.5, and PLLA, respectively. |
Hydrolysis has been used as a chemical etching technique for biodegradable polymers to modify the surface property for promoting cell growth.28,29 Fig. 2d–f showed the surface morphologies of microspheres from PLLA and cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers with different compositions after hydrolysis in NaOH aqueous solution. It was found that there is little change on the surface of PLLA microspheres after hydrolysis (Fig. 2f), while the size and amount of holes on the surface of cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres increased after hydrolysis compared with that of the original ones (Fig. 2d and e). Especially, the holes on surface of cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 microspheres after hydrolysis are larger than that of cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 microspheres.
The morphological changes of above microspheres after hydrolysis are due to the selective degradation of PLLA component in NaOH aqueous solution. The little change of neat PLLA microspheres is due to the slow hydrolysis rate of PLLA. This is because PLLA chains in microspheres pack compactly in crystalline state. However, the water is easier to penetrate into microspheres and break the ester bond of PLLA chains with the help of cellulose which reduces the crystallizability and induces the porous structure of cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres. And, the hydrolysis rate increases with increasing the cellulose content. Therefore, combined with the control of cellulose-g-PLLA composition, the control of hydrolysis degree is another efficient method to guide the design of microspheres with different porous structures.
Fig. 4 shows the water contact angles of the films of cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers and neat PLLA before and after hydrolysis. It was found the contact angle of neat PLLA is 90°. After copolymerized with cellulose, the contact angle of cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 film with less cellulose component is similar to that of PLLA around 90°, while that of cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 film with more cellulose component shows declined to 75°, indicating the increase of hydrophilicity. The further investigation indicated that the cellulose content in copolymers shows significant influence on the hydrolysis of films in NaOH aqueous solution. For PLLA film, the contact angle decreases just from 90° to 80°. While for cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 and cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 films, the contact angles decrease from 90° to 30° and from 75° to 10°, respectively. These results suggest that the hydrolysis results in surface with more hydrophilicity, which is owing to the increased amount of hydroxyl groups and carboxylic groups from broken ester bonds of PLLA chains. And it can be also inferred that the contact angle of film decreased more and faster as cellulose content increased in the copolymer. In consideration of the similar surface properties of cellulose-g-PLLA films and microspheres, the hydrophilicity is also an important role in determining the morphological change of microspheres after hydrolysis in alkali solution.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 Contact angle of polymer films. (a)–(c) are the films of cellulose-g-PLLA6.7, cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 and PLLA before hydrolysis. (d)–(f) are the films of (a)–(c) after hydrolysis, respectively. |
Fig. 5 shows the XPS analysis on cellulose-g-PLLA and neat PLLA microspheres before and after hydrolysis. The microspheres show three peaks with different C 1s binding energies in spectra, i.e. 284.9 eV for alkyl –C–HX, 286.7 eV for ether –C–O, and 289.7 eV for carboxylic –C(O)–O. Before hydrolysis, PLLA has the most carboxylic groups, while cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 copolymer has the least carboxyl groups corresponding to the lowest PLLA content. Owing to the hydrophilicity, the cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers were easily to be attacked by NaOH aqueous solution compared with neat PLLA microspheres. For this reason, the peak areas of hydroxyl and ester of cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 microspheres after hydrolysis show the most obvious increase among three samples, while no detectable changes in surface composition were found for PLLA microspheres. For cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 after hydrolysis, there is a shift on the ratio to hydroxyl. The resultant XPS spectra after hydrolysis indicated that the cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres exhibit more enriched concentration of ether and carboxylic groups on the surface of microspheres compared with untreated ones on the basis of corresponding peak areas. Actually, the increased amount of carboxylic and hydroxyl groups could be regarded as the hydrolysis degree of microsphere surface. Therefore, the XPS results clearly indicated that the microspheres of cellulose-g-PLLA with higher cellulose composition showed easier hydrolysis in alkali solution.
Furthermore as shown in Fig. 6d, d1, e, e1, f and f1 for cell growth on microspheres after hydrolysis, HepG-2 cells did not show different morphologies on PLLA microspheres before and after hydrolysis, but showed more pseudopod on cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 microspheres after hydrolysis. However, the cells did not grow well on cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 microspheres after hydrolysis. Only a small amount of cells adhered without pseudopod onto the hydrolyzed cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 microspheres after hydrolysis. Therefore, it is suggested that the microspheres with suitable cellulose content on the surface (e.g. cellulose-g-PLLA11.5) will endow the microspheres with suitable hydrophilicity, crystallinity and morphology, which are favorable for cell adhesion and growth.
Fig. 7 was the live/dead assay of HepG-2 cells in culture on microspheres for different time observed by fluorescence microscopy. Viable cells are stained green, and dead cells are stained red. The cell density observed by SEM and fluorescence microscopy in Fig. 6 and 7 was different. As shown in Fig. 7a1–f1 on the first day, the spindle-shaped cells were observed on both the untreated and treated PLLA microspheres, while only few cells clustered together as rounded ones adhered to unhydrolyzed and hydrolyzed cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres except for cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 microspheres before hydrolysis. From the viewpoint of chemical structure of microspheres, it could be concluded that the moderate cellulose can provide hydrophilic surface for enhancing cell growth, however, too much cellulose might decrease the cytocompatibility.
When the time came to the third day, the number of cells on untreated microspheres increased as a function of time and displayed characteristic flattened spindle. On the contrary, the number of cells decreased on the hydrolyzed cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres. With further elongating cultivation time to fifth day, even though the number of cells on cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 microspheres did not change, the cells on cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 microspheres show good conditions even better than those on PLLA microspheres. It might be the hydrophilicity resulted from the suitable cellulose content in cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 microspheres more suitable for cell growth.
As shown in Fig. 8, the cell viability on all microspheres increased with time. On the first day, the HepG-2 cells have similar viability on all microspheres. On the third day, the cells on cellulose-g-PLLA6.7 have the lowest viability among all the microspheres either before or after hydrolysis, while the number of cells on PLLA microspheres was the largest. The number of cells on cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 microspheres was ranged in the middle. This result revealed the importance of cellulose content in cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers for cell growth. When the time came to the fifth day, the microspheres fabricated by PLLA or cellulose-g-PLLA11.5 before hydrolysis showed good biocompatibility to cells, and the latter was even better. These results indicate that moderate cellulose in the cellulose-g-PLLA copolymers can lead a positive influence on the biocompatibility of microspheres, while too much cellulose would have a negative influence.
![]() | ||
Fig. 8 HepG-2 cell population on PLLA and cellulose-g-PLLA microspheres before and after hydrolysis for 1, 3 and 5 days of cell cultivation. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |