Open Access Article
Muneebah
Adams
a,
Linley
Barnard
a,
Carmen
de Kock
b,
Peter J.
Smith
b,
Lubbe
Wiesner
b,
Kelly
Chibale
acd and
Gregory S.
Smith
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. E-mail: gregory.smith@uct.ac.za; Fax: +27-21-6505195; Tel: +27-21-6505279
bDivision of Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, K45, OMB, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, 7925, South Africa
cInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
dSouth African Medical Research Council Drug Discovery and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
First published on 25th February 2016
Two series of ferrocenyl- and aryl-derived cyclopalladated organosilane thiosemicarbazone complexes were synthesised via C–H bond activation. Selected compounds were evaluated for in vitro antiplasmodial activity against the chloroquine-sensitive (NF54) and chloroquine-resistant (Dd2) strains of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Cyclopalladation of the thiosemicarbazones resulted in antiplasmodial activities in the low micromolar range.
Chloroquine (CQ), a quinoline-based compound, was the most successful clinical drug of choice for the treatment of malaria, but the emergence of resistant strains of the causative agent Plasmodium falciparum has rendered CQ useless in many parts of the world. The current last line of defence against resistant parasites is the artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) regimen. Unfortunately, the recent emergence of resistance to this regimen in parts of Asia, warrants the search for novel drug regimens.2,3
Thiosemicarbazones (TSCs) are thioureas known to display a large spectrum of pharmacological properties, particularly as antiparasitic agents, and are therefore exploitable in the development of new chemotherapeutics.4–9 The precise antiplasmodial mode of action of TSCs is currently unknown. Thiosemicarbazones are proposed to inhibit cysteine proteases, which are integral in several parasite functions.10
The use of transition metals in drug discovery has become a popular strategy, particularly where metals have been combined with compounds of known therapeutic value in an attempt to combat drug resistance. This has been exemplified by the bioorganometallic compound ferroquine, with ferrocene incorporated into the lateral side-chain of chloroquine, allowing for greater transmembrane interactions owing to its more lipophilic nature.11–13 The most notable pioneering work is the rhodium(I)–chloroquine derivatives synthesised by Sánchez-Delgado and co-workers.14 These derivatives showed a reduction in parasitaemia in vivo to a greater extent than that of chloroquine, endorsing the use of metal-based compounds in malaria chemotherapy. For further reports on metalloantimalarials in the literature, several excellent recent reviews abound.12,13,15–17
The application of platinum group metals (PGMs) as chemotherapeutic agents has therefore emerged as a viable area of research. There are not many examples of transition metal complexes of TSCs reported with antiplasmodial activity. Within our research group, we have evaluated transition metals from the platinum group series as antiplasmodials.4,18–21 We have explored the chemistry associated with N,S- and O,N,S-chelated TSC systems, and to a limited extent the preparation of C,N,S-chelated TSC cyclometallated complexes. Cyclometallated complexes can be prepared via the oxidative addition of aryl halides; however, within our group cyclometallated complexes prepared via C–H activation is of interest.22,23 In particular, the biological evaluation of these types of cyclopalladated complexes especially, is relatively rare.
A recent strategy that we have pursued in the search for novel antimalarial metal-based drug leads is the incorporation of organosilane moieties into our structures.24–26 This strategy has been used with great success to enhance biological activity and reduce toxicity in an effort to increase the therapeutic value of drugs. Organosilane moieties also increase the lipophilicity of a drug molecule which in turn provides several physiological benefits, including improved tissue and cell penetration, which may result in an increase in permeability and ultimately bioavailability.27–32
As a follow-up to our recent studies,24–26 we were prompted to explore the effect of introducing silicon into cyclopalladated thiosemicarbazone complexes, in an attempt to identify potential new antimalarial compounds. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the use of silicon-containing thiosemicarbazone cyclopalladated complexes in the field of bioorganometallic antiplasmodial research.
Herein, we report the synthesis and characterisation of a series of new cyclopalladated silicon-containing compounds based on a thiosemicarbazone scaffold along with their in vitro antiplasmodial activities.
![]() | ||
| Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: (i) EtOH, reflux [7 h (1b); 24 h (2b, 3b)]; (ii) cis-[PdCl2(PTA)2], Et3N, EtOH, reflux, 24 h. | ||
Synthesis of the ferrocenyl- and aryl-derived TSCs was confirmed by the absence of the methanethiol (SCH3) protons and the appearance of signals for the newly incorporated amine in the 1H NMR spectra. The absence of a signal for a proton of the substituted cyclopentadienyl ring (4) or the C-6 position on the aryl ring (5; 6) confirmed the synthesis of the cyclopalladated complexes. Formation of the palladacycle was further confirmed by the absence of the hydrazinic proton, which suggests that the TSC chelates in the thiolate form. Furthermore, in the case of the ferrocenyl-derived cyclopalladated complexes (4a–b), the 1,2-disubstitution of the cyclopentadienyl ring results in the formation of planar chiral complexes. An AB spin system splitting pattern is observed for the PTA ligand.39–41 The NCH2N protons resonate as two doublets corresponding to the different environments experienced by the axial and equatorial protons, while the PCH2N protons resonate as a singlet (ca. 4.26 ppm), as expected for these types of cyclopalladated complexes.
Formation of the complexes is further confirmed by the 13C{1H} NMR spectra. The imine carbon atom, which resonates at ca. 147 ppm for the free TSCs, shifts significantly downfield (ca. 162 ppm) for the complex. Furthermore, the imine carbon atom resonates as a doublet (J = 7.4 Hz), which is ascribed to coupling with the PTA phosphorus. A similar trend is observed for the carbon atom to which the palladium atom is bonded. The carbon atom resonates as a doublet (7.4–8.8 Hz) at 99.5 and ca. 136 ppm for the ferrocenyl- and aryl-derivatives, respectively. This further confirms C–H activation, and thus formation of the palladacycle.
31P{1H} NMR spectroscopic analysis reveals one singlet for the phosphorus nuclei, resonating upfield at approximately −41.6 ppm for the ferrocenyl complexes (4) and approximately −49.7 ppm for complexes 5 and 6. This confirms the presence of one phosphorus species. This is consistent with the literature values for analogous cyclopalladated compounds containing a PTA ligand.20,21 Infrared spectral analysis of the of the palladium-free compounds revealed an absorption band at ca. 1610 cm−1 which corresponds to the imine (C
N) stretching frequency.
Upon formation of the cyclopalladated complex, two absorption bands at around 1578 and 1553 cm−1 are observed which correspond to two C
N stretching frequencies. The absorption band observed at the lower wavenumber is assigned to the palladium-coordinated imine, while the absorption band at the higher wavenumber corresponds to the newly formed C
N bond in the cyclopalladated complexes. The formation of these complexes is further confirmed by mass spectrometry. The mass spectra for complexes 4–6 displayed peaks corresponding to either the molecular ion [M]+ or the protonated form [M + H]+.
Metal-based compounds which are stable in solution are important when ensuring that the tested compound is the compound responsible for the observed biological activity. Therefore, as a model system, the stability of complex 5a was investigated and monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy over a 72 h period at 37 °C. The 1H NMR spectra (Fig. 1) of complex 5a was recorded in DMSO-d6
:
D2O (9
:
1, v/v). The spectra remain unchanged over the time period for the assay, suggesting that compound 5a may be the compound responsible for any observed activity.
| Compound | IC50 (μM) | RIa | SI1 b |
SI2 c |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF54 | Dd2 | CHO | ||||
| a RI = IC50(Dd2)/IC50(NF54). b SI1 = IC50(CHO)/IC50(NF54). c SI2 = IC50(CHO)/IC50(Dd2); ND = not determined. | ||||||
| Fc Dithiocarbamate | 3.76 ± 1.35 | 13.70 ± 1.32 | 0.49 ± 0.21 | 3.64 | 0.13 | 0.036 |
| 3,4-DiClAr dithiocarbamate | 2.59 ± 0.89 | 10.95 ± 1.06 | 1.20 ± 0.41 | 4.23 | 0.46 | 0.11 |
| 1a | 7.92 ± 1.99 | ND | ND | — | — | — |
| 1b | 1.88 ± 0.58 | 2.43 ± 0.26 | ND | 1.29 | — | — |
| 2a | 2.24 ± 0.26 | 2.40 ± 0.57 | 29.28 ± 0.89 | 1.07 | 13.07 | 12.20 |
| 2b | 14.61 ± 2.07 | ND | ND | — | — | — |
| 3a | 175.74 ± 43.03 | ND | ND | — | — | — |
| 3b | 8.72 ± 3.41 | ND | ND | — | — | — |
| 4a | 1.43 ± 0.29 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | 3.93 ± 0.26 | 0.88 | 2.75 | 3.12 |
| 4b | 1.52 ± 0.09 | 1.07 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.70 | — | — |
| 5a | 0.55 ± 0.10 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 3.54 ± 0.21 | 0.53 | 6.44 | 12.21 |
| 5b | 0.58 ± 0.14 | 0.64 ± 0.13 | ND | 1.10 | — | — |
| 6a | 0.83 ± 0.12 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 2.73 ± 0.34 | 0.41 | 3.29 | 8.03 |
| 6b | 1.60 ± 0.48 | 1.49 ± 0.26 | ND | 0.93 | — | — |
| Ferroquine | 0.0249 ± 0.0028 | 0.017 ± 0.0006 | ND | 0.70 | — | — |
| CQDP | 0.0097 ± 0.0039 | 0.19 ± 0.06 | ND | 19.59 | — | — |
| Artesunate | 0.0104 ± 0.0026 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | ND | 4.81 | — | — |
| Emetine | ND | ND | 0.13 ± 0.0062 | — | — | — |
In general, introduction of the cyclopalladated entity resulted in an overall enhancement of activity (IC50 values below 2 μM) against the NF54 strain of P. falciparum, for the complexes (4–6) in comparison with the dithiocarbamates and TSCs. Comparing the three pairs of complexes (4–6), reveals that the Si-containing 3,4-dichloroacetophenoneTSC palladium complexes (5) were the most potent.
An IC50 value of below 5 μM was selected as the cut-off value for identifying potential lead compounds for further testing. Therefore, only those compounds displaying activity below 5 μM against the NF54 strain were further tested for their activity against the Dd2 strain. A decrease in activity was observed for the dithiocarbamates against the resistant strain, whereas the palladium-free TSCs were generally equipotent against the NF54 and Dd2 strains. However, incorporation of the palladium-PTA fragment, generally results in a slight increase in potency against the resistant Dd2 strain. These cyclopalladated complexes were not as active as ferroquine (Table 1).
The resistance indices [RI = IC50 (Dd2)/IC50 (NF54)] were calculated for compounds displaying activity against the Dd2 strain. A value below or close to 1 suggests that the compounds are more likely to be active against resistant strains. The RI values for the cyclopalladated complexes were generally below 1, indicating that incorporation of the palladium-PTA fragment, delivers complexes likely to be active against resistant strains relative to chloroquine (19.59) and artesunate (4.81). Overall, the thiosemicarbazone compounds displayed lower RI values than the controls.
The compounds containing a methylene spacer (1a–6a) were generally more potent, and thus only those compounds were further tested for their cytotoxicity against the CHO cell-line. Selectivity indices [SI = IC50 (CHO)/IC50 (NF54 or Dd2)] calculated for the dithiocarbamates revealed low SI values (<1) suggesting a lack of selectivity. As seen in Table 1, the thiosemicarbazone compounds (2a, 4a, 5a, 6a) are more effective at killing parasitic cells as opposed to the mammalian CHO cells, with SI values higher than that observed for the dithiocarbamates. In terms of the cyclopalladated complexes, the Si-containing 3,4-dichloroacetophenoneTSC palladium complex (5a) displayed the best selectivity.
43 were prepared following literature methods. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded using a Varian Mercury 300 spectrometer (1H at 300.08 MHz), a Bruker 400 Biospin GmbH spectrometer (1H at 400.200 MHz, 13C{1H} at 100.600 MHz, 31P{1H} at 161.80 MHz) or a Bruker 600 FT spectrometer (1H at 600.100 MHz, 13C{1H} at 150.60 MHz) at 30.0 °C. Coupling constants are reported in Hertz. Infrared (IR) spectra were determined using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrometer and was carried out using an Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) unit. High resolution (HR) ESI-mass spectrometry was carried out using a Waters API Quattro instrument in the positive mode. EI-mass spectrometry was carried out in the positive mode using a JEOL GCmateII apparatus. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were recorded on a Thermo Flash 1112 Series CHNS-O Analyser. Melting points were recorded using a Buchi B-540 melting point apparatus and are uncorrected.
:
70, v/v) as eluent. Compound 1b was isolated as an oily-brown solid (0.352 g, 62%). Anal. Calcd (%) for C19H29FeN3SiS·¼H2O: C 54.34; H 7.08; N 10.01; Found C 54.66; H 7.27; N 9.90. IR (ATR) νmax/cm−1: 1599w (C
N). 1H NMR (400.22 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 9.84 (1H, s, NNH); 8.22 (1H, t, 3JHH = 6.0 Hz, NH); 4.79 (2H, t, 3JHH = 3.6 Hz, C5H4); 4.37 (2H, t, 3JHH = 3.6 Hz, C5H4); 4.18 (5H, s, C5H5); 3.52 (2H, m, CH2); 2.19 (3H, s, CH3); 1.58 (2H, m, CH2); 0.48 (2H, m, CH2); 0.01 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (150.60 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 177.6 (C
S); 150.7 (C
N); 83.7, 70.2, 69.5, 67.7 (Fc); 47.0, 23.9, 15.5 (CH2); 13.7 (CH3); −1.09 (Si(CH3)3). EI+-MS (m/z) 415.03 ([M]+, 100%).
N). 1H NMR (399.95 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 10.18 (1H, s, NNH); 8.66 (1H, t, 3JHH = 6.0 Hz, NH); 8.18 (1H, d, 4JHH = 2.2 Hz, H-2); 7.90 (1H, dd, 3,4JHH = 8.5, 2.2 Hz, H-5); 7.64 (1H, d, 3JHH = 8.5 Hz, H-6); 3.55 (2H, m, CH2); 2.28 (3H, s, CH3); 1.58 (2H, m, CH2); 0.49 (2H, t, 3JHH = 6.4 Hz, CH2); 0.01 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 178.4 (C
S); 145.7 (C
N); 138.8, 132.1, 131.8, 130.7, 128.6, 127.2 (Ar–C); 47.2, 23.7, 14.4 (CH2); 13.8 (CH3); −1.09 (Si(CH3)3). EI+-MS (m/z) 377.06 ([M + H]+, 50%).
N). 1H NMR (399.95 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 10.19 (1H, s, NNH); 8.64 (1H, t, 3JHH = 8.0 Hz, NH); 8.20 (1H, d, 4JHH = 2.2 Hz, H-2); 7.91 (1H, dd, 3,4JHH = 8.0, 2.2 Hz, H-5); 7.65 (1H, d, 3JHH = 8.0 Hz, H-6); 3.56 (2H, m, CH2); 2.30 (3H, s, CH3); 1.60 (2H, m, CH2); 1.19 (2H, t, 3JHH = 6.4 Hz, CH2); 0.89 (9H, s, C(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 178.4 (C
S); 145.6 (C
N); 138.8, 132.1, 131.8, 130.7, 128.6, 127.2 (Ar–C); 45.0, 41.1 (CH2); 30.5 (
(CH3)3), 29.9 (C(
H3)3); 24.6 (CH2); 14.4 (CH3). EI+-MS (m/z) 359.09 ([M]+, 100%).
N); 1530w (C
N). 1H NMR (399.95 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 6.56 (1H, t, 3JHH = 6.0 Hz, NH); 4.65 (3H, d, 4JHP = 12.4 Hz, NCH2(eq)N); 4.44 (4H, m, NCH2(ax)N & C5H3); 4.38 (1H, d, 3JHH = 2.4 Hz, C5H3); 4.32 (1H, t, 3JHH = 2.0 Hz, C5H3); 4.24 (6H, s, PCH2N); 4.11 (5H, s, C5H5); 2.79 (2H, d, 3JHH = 6.0 Hz, CH2); 2.14 (3H, s, CH3); 0.038 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 163.0 (C
N); 99.5 (d, 2JCP = 12.9 Hz, C–Pd); 95.2 (
–CN); 75.4 (Fc); 72.5 (d, 3JCP = 6.7 Hz, NCH2N); 69.8, 68.5, 66.7 (Fc); 52.7 (d, 1JCP = 16.1 Hz, PCH2N); 37.3 (CH2); 13.4 (CH3); −1.35 (Si(CH3)3). 31P{1H} NMR (162.01 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = −41.6. EI+-MS (m/z) 647.97 ([M]+, 75%).
N); 1546s (C
N). 1H NMR (400.22 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 6.71 (1H, s, NH); 4.65 (3H, d, 4JHP = 12.8 Hz, NCH2(eq)N); 4.44 (4H, m, NCH2(ax)N & C5H3); 4.39 (1H, d, 3JHH = 2.4 Hz, C5H3); 4.33 (1H, t, 3JHH = 2.4 Hz, C5H3); 4.24 (6H, s, PCH2N); 4.12 (5H, s, C5H5); 3.16 (2H, m, CH2); 2.12 (3H, s, CH3); 1.51 (2H, m, CH2); 0.45 (2H, m, CH2); −0.014 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 95.1 (C–CN); 75.5 (Fc); 72.4 (d, 4JCP = 7.4 Hz, PCH2N); 69.6, 68.6, 66.8 (Fc); 52.8 (d, 1JCP = 16.2 Hz, NCH2N); 48.0, 23.9, 13.9 (CH2); 13.4 (CH3); −1.07 (Si(CH3)3). 31P{1H} NMR (121.47 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = −41.7. ESI+-HRMS (m/z) 677.0923 ([M + H]+, 100%).
N); 1560s (C
N). 1H NMR (300.07 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 7.25 (2H, m, H-2 & NH); 7.11 (1H, d, 4JHP = 3.6 Hz, H-5); 4.58 (3H, d, 4JHP = 12.6 Hz, NCH2(eq)N); 4.44 (3H, d, 4JHP = 12.9 Hz, NCH2(ax)N); 4.27 (6H, s, PCH2N); 2.86 (2H, d, 3JHH = 6.0 Hz, CH2); 2.23 (3H, s, CH3); 0.039 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 163.3 (d, 3JCP = 7.4 Hz, C
N); 153.2 (Ar–C); 136.3 (d, 2JCP = 8.0 Hz, C–Pd); 130.3, 127.0, 126.9, 126.6 (Ar–C); 72.4 (d, 3JCP = 7.2 Hz, NCH2N); 51.5 (d, 1JCP = 15.4 Hz, PCH2N); 37.9 (CH2); 13.5 (CH3); −1.39 (Si(CH3)3). 31P{1H} NMR (121.47 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = −49.6. EI+-MS (m/z) 609.93 ([M + H]+, 2%).
N); 1562w (C
N). 1H NMR (399.95 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 7.23 (1H, s, H-2); 7.12 (1H, d, 4JPH = 3.0 Hz, H-5); 4.60 (3H, d, 4JPH = 13.2 Hz, NCH2(eq)N); 4.47 (3H, d, 4JPH = 13.2 Hz, NCH2(ax)N); 4.28 (6H, s, PCH2N); 3.27 (2H, m, CH2); 2.24 (3H, s, CH3); 1.52 (2H, m, CH2); 0.48 (2H, t, 3JHH = 8.4 Hz, CH2); −0.01 (9H, s, Si(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 175.2 (C–S); 163.8 (Ar–C); 162.4 (d, 2JCP = 7.4 Hz, C
N); 153.2 (Ar–C); 136.4 (d, 2JCP = 8.2 Hz, C–Pd); 130.6, 127.2, 127.1 (Ar–C); 72.6 (d, 3JCP = 7.3 Hz, NCH2N); 51.8 (d, 1JCP = 15.3 Hz, PCH2N); 49.3, 23.9, 14.0 (CH2), 13.4 (CH3); −1.12 (Si(CH3)3). 31P{1H} NMR (121.47 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = −49.8 ppm. ESI+-HRMS (m/z) 637.0488 ([M + H]+, 80%).
N); 1558s (C
N). 1H NMR (399.95 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = 7.26 (1H, s, H-2); 7.17 (1H, br s, NH); 7.11 (1H, d, 4JHP = 3.6 Hz, H-5); 4.58 (3H, d, 4JHP = 12.8 Hz, NCH2(eq)N); 4.45 (3H, d, 4JHP = 12.8 Hz, NCH2(ax)N); 4.28 (6H, s, PCH2N); 3.14 (2H, d, 3JHH = 6.4 Hz, CH2); 2.24 (3H, s, CH3); 0.88 (9H, s, C(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 165.5 (Ar–C); 161.6 (d, 3JCP = 7.4 Hz, C
N); 152.3 (Ar–C); 135.7 (d, 2JCP = 8.8 Hz, C–Pd); 131.7, 128.1, 127.2 (Ar–C); 72.4 (d, 3JCP = 7.2 Hz, NCH2N); 58.0 (CH2); 51.5 (d, 1JCP = 15.4 Hz, PCH2N); 32.3 (
(CH3)3); 27.3 (C(
H3)3); 13.4 (CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (121.47 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) = −49.6. EI+-MS (m/z) 592.09 ([M]+, 1.5%).
N); 1562s (C
N). 1H NMR (399.95 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 7.10 (1H, s, H-2); 7.32 (1H, d, 4JHP = 4.80 Hz, H-5); 4.98 (1H, br s, NH); 4.59 (6H, s, NCH2N); 4.32 (6H, s, PCH2N); 3.36 (2H, m, CH2); 2.28 (3H, s, CH3); 1.56 (2H, m, CH2); 1.22 (2H, m, CH2); 0.89 (9H, s, C(CH3)3). 13C{1H} NMR (100.64 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 174.2 (C–S); 165.5 (Ar–C); 161.8 (d, 3JCP = 7.0 Hz, C
N); 152.4 (Ar–C); 135.8 (d, 2JCP = 9.0 Hz, C–Pd); 131.7, 128.1, 127.2 (Ar–C); 73.4 (d, 3JCP = 7.0 Hz, NCH2N); 52.4 (d, 1JCP = 15.4 Hz, PCH2N); 47.4, 41.3 (CH2); 30.2 (
(CH3)3), 29.3 (C(
H3)3); 24.8 (CH2); 13.3 (CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (162.01 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = −50.8. EI+-MS (m/z) 620.13 ([M]+, 1.1%).
:
D2O stability study
:
D2O (9
:
1, v/v) and the 1H NMR spectrum recorded at 0 h. The solution was warmed at 37 °C, and the stability monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy at 24, 48 and 72 h time intervals to confirm stability of compound during the in vitro assay time period.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |