A. V.
Kuzmin
*abc,
C.
Neumann
a,
L. J. G. W.
van Wilderen
a,
B. A.
Shainyan
b and
J.
Bredenbeck
*a
aInstitute of Biophysics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany. E-mail: bredenbeck@biophysik.uni-frankfurt.de; Fax: +49 69 798 46421; Tel: +49 69 798 46428
bA. E. Favorsky Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Science, 1 Favorsky Str., 664033, Irkutsk, Russian Federation
cLimnological Institute, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Science, 3 Ulan-Batorskaya Str., 664033, Irkutsk, Russian Federation. E-mail: kuzmin@lin.irk.ru
First published on 22nd February 2016
The photochemistry of p-bromophenylsulfonyl azide (BsN3), p-tolylsulfonyl azide (TsN3) and methylsulfonyl azide (MsN3) was studied by femtosecond time-resolved infrared spectroscopy with CH2Cl2 and CCl4 as solvents along with quantum chemical calculations. The photolysis of these azides after 267 nm light excitation leads to the population of each respective azide S1 excited state. Decay of the S1 excited state gives rise to singlet nitrene formation. In the case of BsN3, the decay was found to correlate with the formation of a pseudo-Curtius photoproduct (PCP) BrC6H4NSO2. Transient electronic ground states of the three azides on their way to singlet nitrenes and PCPs were shown by locating the corresponding transition states on the potential energy surfaces. The lifetime of singlet 1(BsN) and 1(TsN) nitrenes is τS = ∼20 ps in CH2Cl2 and ∼700 ps in CCl4. Singlet 1(MsN) was not detected. Due to fast intersystem crossing (ISC), singlet nitrenes are converted into the triplet spin isomers lying lower in energy, the formation time constants being equal to the corresponding singlet nitrene lifetime. The formation of 3(MsN) was shown and the formation time constant in CH2Cl2 was found to be τISC = 34 ± 3 ps. Internal conversion of the S1 excited state to the ground state of the azide was low (Φ ≈ 0.15) for BsN3 and TsN3 and was not found in the case of MsN3.
The photochemistry of 2-naphthylsulfonyl azide (2-C10H7SO2N3) was recently studied by femtosecond time-resolved infrared (fs-TRIR) spectroscopy and the azide S1 excited state has been observed.6 This S1 state decays to produce the singlet nitrene 1(2-C10H7SO2N) as a short-lived species (τS ≈ 0.70 ± 0.30 ns in CCl4) that decays to the lower-energy and longer-lived triplet nitrene 3(2-C10H7SO2N). The triplet spin state is the ground state for sulfonyl nitrenes which has been proved both theoretically6,19,21 and experimentally by ESR and IR spectroscopy in matrices at low temperature.16,17,20 However, neither singlet nor triplet sulfonylnitrenes are global minima, because the most stable species are N-sulfonylimines RNSO2, which are formed with a large energy gain.22 So far, evidence for the formation of the pseudo-Curtius rearrangement product (PCP) after azide photolysis is still inconclusive.6
The possibility of concerted pseudo-Curtius Rearrangement In the Excited State (RIES) of sulfonyl azides as well as other sulfonylnitrene precursors has also been reported.23N-Mesyl and N-tosyldibenzothiophene sulfimides were studied by ns-TRIR spectroscopy as the predecessors of MsN and TsN, respectively.23 The time resolution (50 ns) of this experiment did not allow the authors to detect nitrenes, but sulfonoazepine was detected as a result of singlet nitrene attack on dibenzothiophene. Analysis of stable products formed upon photolysis of N-mesyldibenzothiophene sulfilimines suggests that triplet nitrene was produced upon irradiation. No evidence of pseudo-Curtius rearrangement of the sulfilimines precursor was found. This result suggests that neither singlet nor triplet nitrenes are the precursors of PCPs in solution at room temperature, as was concluded in ref. 6. However, the very recently studied photochemistry of trifluoromethylsulfonyl azide CF3SO2N3 at low temperatures in matrices showed that the triplet nitrene 3(CF3SO2N) generated using the technique of post-pulse irradiation at 193 nm is converted to CF3NSO2 and CF3S(O)NO by a Curtius-type rearrangement.16 Moreover, another new species CF2NSO2F and FSNO were identified along with CF2NF, SO2, F2CO, CF3NO, and SO as side products. This experiment indicates that the possibility of the formation of the PCP as well as other products of rearrangement of nitrenes may depend on the substituent R (in RSO2N).
Such a rich and diverse photochemistry of sulfonyl azides prompted us to investigate three sulfonyl azides that are structurally related to the aforementioned compounds, i.e. p-bromophenylsulfonyl azide (BsN3), p-tolylsulfonyl azide (TsN3) and the simplest member of the family, methylsulfonyl azide (MsN3), by femtosecond time-resolved UV-pump–IR-probe spectroscopy in conjunction with computational studies.
For each stationary point, second derivatives of the energy were calculated to confirm whether these structures were local minima or transition states. All transition state calculations were accompanied by intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations31 to verify that each transition state connected the corresponding reactants and products. The calculated vibrational frequencies were not scaled. The calculated and experimental frequencies along with their assignment are summarized in Table S1 (ESI†).
Vertical excitation energies of azides were computed at the time-dependent TD-B3LYP and TD-M06-2X32,33 levels of theory using the corresponding S0 ground state geometries. To characterize the vertically excited states, electron density difference plots were computed (between S0 and the S1–S3 states) as described previously.6,34 All calculations were performed using the Gaussian09 suite of programs.35
All experiments were performed at room temperature. The final sample concentration was 50 mM in the case of BsN3 and TsN3, and 100 mM for MsN3. CCl4 and CH2Cl2 (Sigma Aldrich) were used as nonpolar and polar solvents in order to estimate the solvent polarity effect on the reaction mechanism and on the time constants. The solution (about 6 ml) was constantly circulated between two 2 mm CaF2 windows separated by a 50 μm spacer in a closed loop flow cell,36 using a peristaltic pump at a speed of 4.4 ml min−1. A comparison of the intensity of the N3 stretch vibrations before and after the experiment via steady-state FTIR measurements reveals that about 8% of BsN3 and TsN3, and ∼20% of MsN3 is photoconverted after 10 h and 14 h of laser experiments, respectively.
As was shown previously, 330 nm excitation of 2-C10H7SO2N3 in the same solvents resulted in higher values of the ground state ΦIC (up to 0.6 in CH2Cl2) and two times higher RIC.6 In the case of BsN3 and TsN3 the internal conversion is low after irradiation at 267 nm. Its yield is not affected by the nature of the solvent and the RIC is in the range of a few 109 s−1. In terms of the potential energy surface (PES) that means that S1 and S0 states of these azides have a rather large energy gap and obviously sufficiently separated PESs, so there is no conical intersection between them.
TD-B3LYP calculations predict that 267 nm light directly populates the S1 excited state of BsN3, TsN3 and MsN3 (vide infra). Unfortunately, we failed to experimentally detect any noticeable signal within 30 ps which could be assigned to the azide excited state S1 in this spectral window for all studied azides. Interestingly, according to TD-M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) results, the BsN3 S1 excited state is 56 cm−1 red-shifted with respect to 2337 cm−1 in S0, and has eight times lower intensity than that for the S0 state of azide, 83 vs. 691 km mol−1 (Fig. S7 and Table S8, ESI†). That means that maximum ΔA of the S1 signal is predicted to be ∼1.1 mOD since the S0 state has a negative intensity signal of ∼−9 mOD. However, the S1 state signal was not spectroscopically observed in the azide spectral window. The obtained experimental results allowed us to conclude that the S1 states of BsN3, TsN3 and MsN3 are probably weak IR-active species, showing signals which are even weaker than predicted, because otherwise they would have been detected. A similar behavior was recently observed in studying photochemistry of 5-azido-2-(N,N-diethylamino)pyridine.37 The authors named the non-observable S1 state a ‘spectroscopically dark’ excited state. It can be assumed that such a spectroscopic behavior of the S1 state is due to identical or close symmetry of the ground and excited states rather than the n → π* nature of S0 → S1 transition of the compounds. However, a low-intense signal appearing within 30 ps in the 1500–1600 cm−1 spectral window and its decay within 50 ps were observed for BsN3 in CH2Cl2 (vide infra). We have found no evidence of triplet azide formation while the theory predicts strong signals (ε = ∼1000 km mol−1) for such species.
Although the azide spectral region did not contain signals from azide's excited state S1, it was clearly possible to observe intramolecular vibrational redistribution or ‘vibrational cooling’ (VC) of the hot azide ground state formed from the S1 state for BsN3 and TsN3 in both CCl4 and CH2Cl2 (Fig. S2, ESI† for BsN3). VC typically exhibits itself by showing a time-dependent upshift in wavenumber of a vibrational mode. For instance, a vibrationally hot ground state of BsN3 dissolved in CCl4 was observed in the spectral range of 2110–2121 cm−1 (2102–2119 cm−1 in CH2Cl2, see Fig. S2, ESI†). The onset and decay time constants are 13 ± 5 ps at 2112 cm−1 and 20 ± 19 ps at 2119 cm−1 in CCl4 for BsN3 (and 15 ± 1 ps at 2102 cm−1 and 16 ± 3 ps at 2119 cm−1 in CH2Cl2). Similar VC values were obtained for TsN3 while for MsN3 no VC was found since no ground state recovery was observed.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Transient kinetic surface plots for BsN3 solution in CCl4 in the range of 1320–1400 cm−1 (a) and in CH2Cl2 in the range of 1300–1400 cm−1 (b). Wavelength ranges in (a) and (b) are different due to solvent shifts. Transient IR spectra produced in the range of 1320–1400 cm−1 (c and d) and 1140–1210 cm−1 (e) upon BsN3 photolysis in CCl4 at selected time delays. See transient kinetics traces in Fig. 4 and transient IR spectra in Fig. S10 (ESI†) for more details. The time axes in (a) and (b) are linear up to 1 ps and logarithmic thereafter. Assignments are depicted by labels, arrows and lines that serve as guides to the eye. |
The 1377 cm−1 feature in Fig. 3b shows little recovery (about 7%, but ∼20% in the case of CCl4 as the solvent) and its time constant is 38 ± 9 ps (CH2Cl2). This is about 50% slower than τIC = 28 ± 1 ps (CH2Cl2) obtained from the trace at 1576 cm−1. We believe that the observed behavior of this band is due to three different processes. One of them is the S1 azide excited state formation absorbing at 1377 cm−1, and the second one is its decay.6 Assuming that the S1 decay and S0 recovery time constants and extinction coefficients are equal they cancel each other, as predicted by the M06-2X calculations (see above). The third process, according to M06-2X calculations, is the formation of p-bromo-N-sulfonylaniline (BrC6H4NSO2) as the pseudo-Curtius photoproduct (B-PCP). The evolution of the νas(SO2) band at 1391 cm−1 in CCl4 shows ∼20% recovery of S0, close to that for the azide ground state in the N3 stretch region. This trace is well separated from the band assigned to the PCP (1365 cm−1, see Fig. 3b and d). One point that remains unclear is why in CH2Cl2 the ground state νas(SO2) band has two times less recovery than that in the N3 stretch region.
Since the S1 excited state of sulfonyl azides is a dissociative species capable of elimination of molecular nitrogen, singlet nitrene 1(BsN) is observed in both CH2Cl2 and CCl4. The singlet appears as a vibrationally hot species (see Fig. 3a–c, marked as ‘hot singlet nitrene’, and Fig. S10, ESI†), evident by a band shift from 1325 to 1350 cm−1 in CH2Cl2 and from 1340 to 1357 cm−1 in CCl4. Fig. 3a–c show the results in CCl4 because the kinetics of the vibrationally hot singlet nitrene cooling process is slower than that observed in CH2Cl2, and because the cooling process in the latter suffers from significant spectral overlap between hot singlet and triplet nitrenes (evident by the shifting isosbestic point in Fig. S10, ESI†). The time constant of hot 1(BsN) formation is observed on a 2 ps timescale on the low wavenumber side of the signal, however, due to the spectral overlap of the cooling and formation processes, the actual formation timescale might actually be a bit slower; we conservatively estimate this value to be less than 20 ps. When CCl4 is used as the solvent, the lifetime of singlet 1(BsN) nitrene is substantially longer than that of VC. Thus, in CCl4 the cooled singlet nitrene 1(BsN) observed at 1360 cm−1 has a formation time constant of τSN(CCl4) = 20 ± 1 ps and its relaxation lifetime is τISC(CCl4) = 0.75 ± 0.10 ns.
Previous experimental and computational studies show that singlet sulfonyl nitrenes are unstable, highly reactive species that rapidly convert into more stable triplet isomers via intersystem crossing.6,23 Recently, we confirmed that such transformation has an activation barrier of as low as 2 kcal mol−1.21 That means that the formation of triplet nitrene is, apparently, the predominant if not the only process of transformation of the singlet nitrene and the two processes should occur with the same rate. Indeed, along with singlet 1(BsN) nitrene decay, a new persistent (lifetime >3 ns) positive signal appears in CH2Cl2 at 1323 cm−1 belonging to 3(BsN) with the time constant τISC(CH2Cl2) = 20 ± 1 ps (see Fig. 3b and 4). A ‘rise-decay-rise’ profile of the 1323 cm−1 curve in Fig. 4 results from the imposed exponentials for the appearance of hot singlet nitrene, its decay, and the formation of the triplet nitrene, as can also be followed by color changes at 1323 cm−1 (yellow-orange-yellow-red) in Fig. 3b. A similar time constant of formation was also detected near 1148 cm−1 in the νs(SO2) region (Fig. 3e and 4). With CCl4 as the solvent the band appears much later at 1347 cm−1 and has a time constant of τISC(CCl4) = 0.70 ± 0.23 ns (Fig. 4). According to the B3LYP results (Fig. S4, Table S3, ESI†) the long-lived species may be assigned to either 3(BsN) (1342 cm−1) or B-PCP (1354 cm−1) or both. The B-PCP has also an additional predicted band at 1377 cm−1 of double intensity. Experimentally, a low intensity band was observed at 1365 cm−1 and 1360 cm−1 in CCl4 and CH2Cl2, respectively, and assigned to B-PCP. The calculated band at 1354 cm−1 is therefore expected to exhibit an even lower intensity, leading us to assign the 1323 cm−1 feature in CH2Cl2 to 3(BsN) nitrene.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 FTIR spectra of BsN3 (top), TsN3 (centre) and MsN3 (bottom) solved in CCl4 (subtracted), a spacer thickness of 50 μm along with the B3LYP predicted vibration modes (red bars). |
Singlet and triplet nitrenes are not the only products of photolysis derived from the azide S1 excited state. For arylsulfonylazides, the formation of a PCP was postulated.6,38 Both DFT functionals used here predict the presence of B-PCP, appearing as a 29 cm−1 red-shifted signal to 1377 cm−1 in the case of the B3LYP functional (Fig. S4, ESI;† it red-shifts only 8 cm−1 to 1383 cm−1 for M06-2X, see Fig. S7, ESI†) near νas(SO2) of the azide ground state. For instance, for BsN3 in CCl4 and CH2Cl2 the signal of B-PCP was detected at 1365 and 1360 cm−1, respectively. From the trace at 1365 cm−1 in CCl4 it is not possible to extract the parameters of B-PCP formation since it significantly overlaps with that of 1(BsN). However, we were able to derive these time constants from the observed trace at 1360 cm−1 (see Fig. 4), and to obtain τRIES(CH2Cl2) = 17 ± 1 ps. The B-PCP's formation time constant of 17 ± 1 ps correlates well with the time constant of the azide S1 excited state depletion (at 1559 cm−1, 22 ± 2 ps) as well as 1(BsN)'s lifetime. However, previous studies have shown that singlet sulfonyl nitrene cannot be a precursor of the PCP since there is no evidence of PCP formation when a non-azide precursor is used23 and that both B-PCP and 1(BsN) are formed exclusively from the S1 excited state of the azide.6 This conclusion was also confirmed by our unsuccessful attempts to locate a transition state between 1(BsN) and the B-PCP (vide infra).
Method | Compound | N3 stretch | SO2 asym. stretch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calculated | Experiment | Error | Calculated | Experiment | Error | ||
B3LYP | BsN3 | 2253 | 2128 | 125 | 1406 | 1392 | 14 |
TsN3 | 2250 | 2123 | 127 | 1403 | 1384 | 19 | |
MsN3 | 2263 | 2135 | 128 | 1401 | 1373 | 28 | |
M06-2X | BsN3 | 2337 | 2128 | 209 | 1391 | 1392 | 1 |
TsN3 | 2331 | 2123 | 208 | 1383 | 1384 | 1 | |
MsN3 | 2351 | 2135 | 216 | 1367 | 1373 | 6 |
Since B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,3pd) calculations of the azide S1 state are extremely time-consuming, we present the vibrational frequencies of S1 states calculated at the M06-2X level for all azides and at the B3LYP level only for MsN3. Full lists of the vibrational frequencies for the S0, S1 and T1 states of azides (RSO2N3), singlet nitrenes 1(RSO2N), triplet nitrenes 3(RSO2N) and pseudo-Curtius photoproducts (RNSO2) are given in Tables S2–S13 (ESI†) and plotted in Fig. S4–S9 (ESI†). It should be noted that M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) adequately predicts PCP and azide ground state vibrational frequencies, but shows some inaccuracy in the prediction of singlet and triplet nitrenes while B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,3pd) adequately predicts the vibrational frequencies for the azide ground state, singlet and triplet nitrenes, but not for the PCP.
The B3LYP/6-31G(3df,3pd) optimized geometries of the azides were used for calculations of vertical excitations by the TD-B3LYP method. The lowest electronic transition occurs at 278, 277 and 258 nm in the case of BsN3, TsN3 and MsN3, respectively, which corresponds to the HOMO–LUMO electronic transition. In MsN3 the transition has a very low predicted oscillator strength f = 0.0001 at 258 nm. The predicted transitions are in good agreement with the ground-state electronic absorption spectra of the azides (Fig. 6). Note that the laser excitation wavelength was centered at 267 nm (having 1.2 nm FWHM), and because the difference in wavelength between the S0 → S1 and S0 → S2 electronic transitions is calculated to be >20 nm, the collected experimental data refer to the S0 → S1 transition.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 UV spectra of BsN3 (top, 1 mM; 0.1 cm), TsN3 (centre, 1 mM; 0.1 cm) and MsN3 (bottom, 10 mM; 0.2 cm) in ethanol along with the B3LYP predicted vertical excitations (blue bars). |
In addition, electron density difference plots of the singlet excited states were calculated at the TD-B3LYP/6-31G(3df,3pd) level of theory for the azides in order to identify the character of the excited states, according to ref. 6 (Fig. S15, ESI†). This approach shows that the S1 excited state corresponds to the promotion of an electron from the sulfonyl oxygen lone pair to the π*-orbital of the azide group, and in the case of the aromatic compounds also to the in-plane π*-orbital of the aromatic system. Accumulation of electron density on the π*-orbital of the terminal NβNγ moiety suggests that the S1 excited state is a dissociative state and that the corresponding nitrene can be formed from the initially excited sulfonyl azide. This prediction is consistent with our experimental observations (vide supra).
If the pseudo-Curtius rearrangement products cannot be formed from the corresponding nitrenes (which we have experimentally confirmed, and as reported earlier6,23), there must exist an alternative route to them from the original azides. Indeed, two independent transition states (TSs), each with only one imaginary mode, were located on the PESs of the studied azides. One of them leads to nitrene, while another one, lying ∼2 kcal mol−1 (R = p-BrC6H4 and p-Tol) or ∼10 kcal mol−1 (R = Me) higher, leads to the PCP. Although the structures of the two TSs depicted in Fig. 7 look similar, they are principally different as proved by IRC calculations and by the analysis of the imaginary modes. The first TS (top row in Fig. 7) leading to nitrenes is located mainly on the Nα⋯Nβ bond and reflects the process of elimination of the N2 molecule. The second TS (bottom row) leading to PCPs has a ∼150 cm−1 higher imaginary wavenumber, suggesting a steeper reaction valley and being in line with a larger barrier.40 Comparable contributions of the Nα⋯Nβ bond elongation and simultaneous decrease of the C⋯Nα distance due to contraction of the NSC angle, together with notable C–S bond elongation, are clearly indicative of changes finally leading to the PCP formation. These results can be considered as an independent theoretical confirmation of the aforementioned conclusion that singlet sulfonyl nitrenes cannot be precursors for the PCP formation.
We also tried to locate a transition state on the way from singlet or triplet nitrenes to PCPs. For singlet nitrenes no TS could be found. In contrast, we did locate a TS (with an energy of 42 kcal mol−1; not shown in Table 2) for triplet 3(MsN) leading to triplet PCP. This is in agreement with the results of matrix isolation experiments of the triplet nitrene 3(CF3SO2N) and its further UV-promoted transformation into the final product CF3NSO2via the elusive 3(CF3NSO2).16
![]() | ||
Fig. 8 Mechanism of photochemical transformations of sulfonyl azides upon 267 nm irradiation. The lifetime shown under a species corresponds to the overall decay of that species. |
Species | Substituent, R | ||
---|---|---|---|
p-BrC6H4 | p-Tol | Me | |
*![]() |
|||
Azide S0 state | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Azide S1 state | 102.7 | 103.2 | 111.0 |
Azide T1 state | 88.3 | 91.4 | 100.4 |
TS1 RSO2N3 → 1(RSO2N) + N2 | 38.6 | 38.9* | 39.4 |
Singlet nitrene 1(RN) + N2 | 32.1 | 31.9 | 33.6 |
Triplet nitrene 3(RN) + N2 | 17.5 | 17.2 | 19.8 |
TS2 RSO2N3 → RNSO2 + N2 | 40.5 | 40.3 | 49.8 |
RNSO2 | −35.0 | −34.1 | −29.6 |
Singlet–triplet energy gap, ΔEST | 14.6 | 14.7 | 13.8 |
As shown in Table 2, transformation of the azide S0 state to 1(RSO2N) involves an energy barrier of ∼39 kcal mol−1. Calculations show that the formation of a PCP from the azide S0 state is influenced by the substituent at the SO2 group and exhibits an energy barrier of ∼40 kcal mol−1 for arylsulfonyl azides and 50 kcal mol−1 for MsN3. Thus, since the barriers of transformation of arylsulfonyl azides to singlet nitrenes and PCPs are similar, one could expect the formation of both species for all compounds. However, singlet nitrene formation from MsN3 is ∼10 kcal mol−1 more preferable than the formation of a PCP. The rest of the excitation energy of 107.5 kcal mol−1 absorbed by the azide molecules is available for product formation. It also explains why the singlet nitrenes (and probably PCP as well) are formed as vibrationally hot species which subsequently cool down.
Vibrationally hot singlet nitrenes were detected only for BsN3 and TsN3 in both solvents but not for MsN3. Subsequent relaxation of hot nitrene gives rise to the formation of a cooled singlet species 1(RSO2N). For 1(RSO2N) the B3LYP calculations predict νas = 1375, 1370 and 1382 cm−1 for R = p-BrC6H4, p-Tol and Me, respectively. These wavenumbers are in good agreement with the experimentally observed absorption signals of relaxed singlet nitrenes 1(BsN) and 1(TsN) detected at 1360 and 1349 cm−1 in CCl4. Their decay constants were found to be kISC(CCl4) = (1.3 ± 0.4) × 109 s−1 and (1.5 ± 0.4) × 109 s−1, respectively. Determination of singlet nitrene decay constants in CH2Cl2 is complicated by VC and we tentatively estimate it to be approximately 50 × 109 s−1.
Similar to the features observed for singlet nitrenes, weak persistent (>3 ns) bleaches of triplet 3(BsN) and 3(TsN) nitrenes were observed at 1347 and 1337 cm−1 in CCl4. The formation constants are kISC(CCl4) = (1.4 ± 1.0) × 109 s−1 and (2.3 ± 1.7) × 109 s−1, respectively, which are comparable to the singlet nitrene decay constants, thus indicating that both transitions correspond to the same process.6 The decay constants of singlet nitrenes in CH2Cl2 are deduced from the formation constants of triplet nitrenes which were found to be kISC(CH2Cl2, 3(BsN)) = (50 ± 5) × 109 s−1 and kISC(CH2Cl2, 3(TsN)) = (40 ± 6) × 109 s−1, and therefore are significantly larger than in CCl4. Note also that a persistent band (>3 ns) of 3(MsN) was detected at 1134 cm−1 in CH2Cl2, which was assigned to the triplet nitrene formation with the formation constant kISC(CH2Cl2) = (29 ± 5) × 109 s−1. The latter value is slightly lower than that for 3(BsN) and 3(TsN), apparently due to the fact that two single time traces are compared, which do not necessarily need to represent the absorption of a single species (i.e. their transient absorptions could overlap). It is an indicator of a transient kinetic difference between aliphatic and aromatic azide photochemistry along with the absence of the azide ground state recovery.
Another permanent product of acyl- and sulfonylazide photochemistry is the PCP.5,6,16 Its formation was clearly detected for BsN3 and TsN3 in CH2Cl2, while in CCl4 the PCP's SO2 band overlaps with that of the corresponding singlet nitrene. The trace near 1360 cm−1 in CH2Cl2, corresponding to cooled B-PCP, was found to have the formation constant kRIES(CH2Cl2, B-PCP) = (59 ± 7) × 109 s−1. The value correlates well with the azide S1 state decay (kISC(CH2Cl2, BsN3) = (46 ± 8) × 109 s−1 at 1559 cm−1) and falls in the range of the singlet nitrene 1(BsN) decay constants. Previous experiments showed that only azide, not singlet nitrene, is a predecessor of the PCP.6,23 Furthermore, the transition state has been located to connect the ground state sulfonyl azide and PCP structures (Table 2). This transformation requires ∼41 kcal mol−1 for the aromatic azides, a similar value as calculated here for TS1 leading to singlet nitrene formation. However, the energy of transition state TS2 leading to MeNSO2 was calculated to be 10 kcal mol−1 higher than that leading to 1(MsN). According to calculations, the formation of 1(MsN) is ∼3.3 × 104 times faster than that of MeNSO2 and one could expect exclusive formation of 1(MsN) rather than MeNSO2.
In conclusion, for many years chemists believed that the formation of N-sulfonylamines RNSO2 and their better known carbonyl analogues, isocyanates RNCO proceeds in two steps via generation of the corresponding nitrenes followed by their Curtius-type rearrangement.42 However, recent investigations6,43 as well as the results of the present work employing ultrafast laser techniques call into question these notions and suggest an alternative, concerted mechanism of the Curtius-type rearrangement, at least as far as the formation of N-sulfonylamines from sulfonyl azides is concerned. Indeed, both our and other's experiments6,43 prove the formation of PCPs and singlet nitrenes from the S1 excited state of sulfonyl azides by comparing the formation/degradation time constants. Also, our calculations predict the existence of two different transition states, one connecting the azide and the singlet nitrene and another one connecting the azide and the pseudo-Curtius rearrangement product. This may encourage chemists to reinvestigate and reconsider the mechanism of other similar sextet rearrangements, like Lossen, Beckmann, Schmidt, Hofmann and Wolff rearrangements.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: FTIR and UV spectra of azides along with predicted bands, transient kinetics and transient IR spectra, calculated IR vibrational frequencies of all species, EDD plots, and geometries and energies of all molecules. See DOI: 10.1039/c5cp07636f |
This journal is © the Owner Societies 2016 |