Synthesis of a novel bifunctional nanocomposite with tunable upconversion emission and magnetic properties

Qian Chengab, Yu Lic, Shouxin Liu*a, Jiehe Suib and Wei Caib
aSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, PR China. E-mail: liushouxin@126.com; Fax: +86-451-8219-1506; Tel: +86-451-8219-1502
bNational Key Laboratory of Materials Behaviours & Evaluation Technology in Space Environments, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, PR China
cCollege of Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, P. R. China

Received 6th August 2015 , Accepted 22nd October 2015

First published on 23rd October 2015


Abstract

Fluorescent and magnetic bifunctional NaYF4:Yb/Er/Co nanoparticles were synthesized for the first time via a thermalysis method using oleic acid as capping ligand and octadecene as solvent. The effect of Co2+-codoped on the size evolution, crystal structure, UC emission and magnetic properties of NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles was investigated in detail. XRD, EDS and XPS measurements revealed that Co2+ ions had been successfully incorporated into NaYF4 matrix and existed in the host lattice under the II valence state. The different concentration of Co ions codoping did not change the structure of hexagonal phase. However, the green and red upconversion (UC) emissions intensity of hexagonal NaYF4:Yb/Er were obviously strengthened by tridoping the structure with Co2+/Yb3+/Er3+, and the decay time was obviously prolonged with different quantity of Co2+ ions tridoping. The luminescence enhancement should be attributed to the distortion of the local asymmetry around Er3+ ions. A possible mechanism for the enhancement of upconversion emission was discussed. More importantly, owing to the cobalt ion doping, the NaYF4 nanoparticles also present paramagnetic properties at room temperature and superparamagnetic properties at low temperature. Therefore, it is expected that these nanocrystals can be used as promising dual-modal nanoprobes for optical bioimaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and may have potential applications in bioseparation.


1. Introduction

Trivalent lanthanide (Ln3+) ions-doped luminescent nanoparticles (NPs) have attracted much attention and come to the forefront in nanophotonics owing to their superior optical features including large effective Stoke shifts, sharp emission bandwidths, long photoluminescence (PL) lifetime, low toxicity as well as high resistance to photo bleaching.1–3 These unique properties make them highly suitable for use as alternatives to organic fluorescent dyes or quantum dots (QDs) for various biological applications. Among these materials, hexagonal (β) NaYF4 NPs has been reported to be the most effective host material for UC emission due to its intrinsic low phonon energies (∼350 cm−1), which decreases the nonradioactive relaxation probability and results in more efficient UC emissions.4,5 Up to now, lots of research has focused on the study of β-NaYF4 NPs.6–8 Despite significant progress in studying the bioapplication of UCNPs, the low emission efficiency of UCNPs limits the practical application for in vivo imaging.9–11 Recently, some reports on incorporating atoms or ions of appropriate elements into host lattices to yield hybrid materials with desirable properties and functions have attracted wide attention of researches. For example, Liu X. G. et al. reported that doping of lanthanide ions with a size larger than Y3+ in NaYF4 host lattices could dominate the formation of pure hexagonal-phase NaYF4 NPs. Furthermore, they had successfully fulfilled to synthesize upconversion NPs with simultaneous controlling over crystal phase, size and emission colours through the control different combinations of lanthanide dopants at precisely defined concentration.12 Very recently, Hao's group reported that Gd3+ codoped NaLuF4:Yb3+/Tm3+ NPs with near-infrared upconversion and magnetic properties could be readily modified by doping with Gd3+ and demonstrated that Gd3+ addition could promote the transformation from the cubic to hexagonal phase and reduced the size.13

Transition metal (TM) ions such as iron, cobalt, manganese and molybdenum ions codoping into some host lattices can also generate magnetic properties or modify the structure, size and optical properties.14–16 For example, cobalt and nickel ions doped into ZnO NPs could giving them different optical and magnetic properties.14 Furthermore, co doping could effectively adjust the energy level in ZnO nanorods, which led to variation in the UV emission peak position and enhanced the luminescence performance in the visible light region as well modify ZnO NPs with magnetic properties.15 However, rarely applied on UCNPs, furthermore, size, shape and phase have great influence on their luminescence and biological application. Wu's group reported incorporating 10 mol% Mo3+ ions into NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ nanoparticles could enhance the intensity of green and red emission by 6 and 8 times respectively.17 Zhao's group reported that NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ upconversion NPs doped Mn2+ could make simultaneously controlling the phase and UC emission behavior.18 Tian's group found the total luminescence intensity of NaYbF4:Er3+ UCNPs doped with 20 mol% Mn2+ ions is about 20 times higher than that of NaYbF4:Er3+ UCNPs doped without Mn2+ ions.19 J. Kim doped 30 mol% Fe3+ in NaGdF4:Yb, Er nanocrystals and observed enhancement up to 34 and 30 times in the visible green and red UC emissions.20 All of the above results show that transition metal ions doping into the host lattice can modify the optical and magnetic properties. However, as far as we know, there is no report on the study of influence on the upconversion emission intensity and magnetic properties of NaYF4:Yb, Er NPs by metal Co2+ ions codoping.

In this paper, we report the upconversion emission enhancement in β-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs by co-doping cobalt ion. The influence of Co2+ ions on the crystalline structure, size, UC emission and the radiation lifetimes of intermediate 4S3/2 and 4F9/2 (Er) states of β-NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs was investigated. Furthermore the influence of Co2+ ions on magnetization was presented. The as-synthesized fluorescent and magnetic bifunctional NaYF4:Yb/Er/Co NPs have highly efficient UC luminescence and excellent paramagnetic behaviour, which may have potential applications in bioseparation, fluorescent and MRI bioimaging.

2. Experimental

2.1 Chemicals and methods

Oleic acid (OA, 90%), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, 99%), 1-octadecene (ODE, 70%) and cobalt(II) acetylacetonate (Co(acac)2, 98%) were purchased from Aldrich. All other chemicals were analytical grade and used without further purification. Water used in the experiment was purified to resistivity of 18.2 MΩ. RE2O3 (RE = Y, Yb and Er) used were of 99.99% purity. Rare-earth trifluoroacetates ((CF3COO)3RE) were prepared from the corresponding metal oxides and TFA followed by the literature method.21

2.2 Synthesis of Co2+-doped NaYF4 nanoparticles

NaYF4:2% Er3+/20% Yb3+/x Co2+ (x = 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30%) NPs were synthesized by a modified co-thermolysis method using oleic acid as both a stabilizing and a chelating agent. The mixture of (CF3COO)3Y, (CF3COO)3Yb, (CF3COO)3Er, CF3COONa and Co(acac)2 with corresponding mole ratios was dissolved in OA (20 mL) and ODE (20 mL). Under vigorous stirring, the mixture was then heated to 110 °C under the protection of argon atmosphere and maintained at the same temperature for 30 min to remove the oxygen and residual water. Finally, the solution was totally clear with a blue colour. The resultant blue solution was then heated quickly to 330 °C in the presence of argon for protection from oxidation. After heating for 1.5 h, the transparent purple reaction mixture was cooled down to 80 °C before ethanol (20 mL) was added. The NPs were isolated by centrifugation. They were washed three times with hexane and three times with deionized water to remove the NaF residue. The resulting NPs were dried in vacuum at 50 °C for 24 h.

2.3 Characterization

The crystal structure was analyzed by a Rigaku-D/max 2500 X-ray diffractometer (XRD) using a nickel-filtered CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15405 nm). The morphologies and sizes of the samples were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images on a Philips Tencai 20 at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were measured on an ESCA PHI500 spectrometer by using a twin-anode Cu Kα (12.5 kV) X-ray source. All the spectra were calibrated to the binding energy of the adventition C1s peak at 284.6 eV. The upconversion emission spectra were acquired using FluoroMax-4 fluorescence spectrometer system equipped with a focused 1300 mW power-controllable 980 nm diode laser coupled to a 100 μm (core) fiber and the luminescent photographs were taken with Nikon D3100 digital camera. The magnetization as a function of the applied magnetism of the Co2+ codoped NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals was carried out by the physical properties measurement system (PPMS) of Quantum Design with a magnetic field up to 6 T. All the measurements were performed at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Structure and morphology

The phase and morphology of the as-prepared samples were analyzed by XRD and TEM techniques, respectively. Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of the NaYF4 doped with 2 mol% Er3+, 20 mol% Yb3+ ions, and tridoped with different concentrations of Co2+ ions. As shown in Fig. 1, all the peak positions and intensities match closely with those of hexagonal structure according to Powder Diffraction File PDF 16-0334. In addition, no other impurity diffraction peaks were observed even the Co2+ ions concentration increased to 30 mol%, indicating all the Co2+ ions were incorporated into the host matrix and formed a Y–Co solid solution structure. The XPS survey spectrum (Fig. S1) shows the presence of Na, Y, F, Yb, Er and Co elements. The peak located at 781.9 eV and 795.3 eV can be attributed to the binding energy of Co2p3/2 and Co2p1/2 orbital's, respectively, which is also indicating all the Co2+ ions were incorporated into the host matrix and formed a Y–Co solid solution structure.
image file: c5ra21721k-f1.tif
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of NaYF4 samples doped with different Co2+ contents: (a) 0%, (b) 5%, (c) 10%, (d) 15% (e) 20% and (f) 30%.

Moreover, all the diffraction peaks shift slightly to larger angles as Co2+ ion concentration increases from 0 to 15 mol%, and then gradually move reversely for Co2+ ion concentration of 15–30 mol% (see ESI Fig. S2). The shifting of the peak's position shows that the lattice parameters changes with the different concentration of Co2+ ions codoping. The above results were shown in Table 1. Owing to the substitution of Y3+ (radius = 0.89 Å) by the smaller Co2+ ion (radius = 0.72 Å), the unit-cell volume decreases with increasing Co2+ content at the range of 0–15 mol%, and then increases with Co2+ content at the range of 15–30 mol%, this may be attributed to a change in symmetry that the cell volume of NaYF4 did not decrease linearly with increasing Co2+ doping concentration.21,22 This change also suggests that Co2+ ions with smaller ionic radii substitute or occupation of interstitial sites for Y3+ in the NaYF4 lattice, and the unit cell contracts to accommodate these heterogeneous ions.

Table 1 The lattice constants and unit-cell volumes of NaYF4:Yb/Er doped with different concentrations of Co2+
  0% Co2+ 5% Co2+ 10% Co2+ 15% Co2+ 20% Co2+ 30% Co2+
a 5.973 5.965 5.960 5.950 5.962 5.971
c 3.510 3.498 3.494 3.500 3.504 3.505
Unit-cell volume/Å3 108.44 107.79 107.35 107.276 108.12 108.28


Fig. 2 shows the typical TEM images of the as-prepared NaYF4 NPs doped with different contents of Co2+ ion. As shown in Fig. 2, the nanoparticles were hexagonal nanoplate with good dispersivity, and the morphology has not been affected by codoping of Co2+ ions. With increasing Co2+ doping concentration from 15% to 20%, the size of nanoplate slightly changes small, however, the thickness of nanoplate increases, indicating that doping of Co2+ ions can influences the growth of crystals. The phenomenon is similar to Sn4+ ions codoping in NaYF4 nanoparticles,23 which attribute to organic molecules being selectively adsorbed on crystal surfaces and controlling the growth rates along different directions. And EDS spectrum in Fig. S2 clearly shows the presence of Co and other elements confirming the successful doping of Co and other elements.


image file: c5ra21721k-f2.tif
Fig. 2 TEM images of the NaYF4:20% Yb3+/1% Er3+/x Co2+ nanoparticles: (a) 0%, (b) 5%, (c) 10%, (d) 15%, (e) 20%, (f) 30%.

3.2 Optical properties of the NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+/Co2+ nanoparticles

To investigate the influence of different Co2+ tridoping concentration on UC luminescence, the room temperature upconversion luminescence spectra of NaYF4:20% Yb3+/2% Er3+/x Co2+ (x = 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30%) NPs were measured using FluoroMax-4 fluorescence spectrometer system equipped with a focused 1300 mW power-controllable 980 nm diode laser coupled to a 100 μm (core) fiber, and were shown in Fig. 3. All the samples exhibited three distinct bands in the range of 500–700 nm. According to the Fig. 3, the dominant green emissions ranging from 515 to 530 nm and from 530 to 550 nm were assigned to the 2H11/24I15/2 and 4S3/24I15/2 transitions, respectively. The red emission from 635 to 670 nm was attributed to the 4F9/24I15/2 transition. In addition, the figure showed that the intensity of green and red UC luminescence was drastically enhanced with the increasing of Co2+ ions tridoping concentration, when the Co2+ ions concentration reached 15 mol%, the green and red UC luminescence intensity reached its maximum and were about 114 and 84 times stronger than that of Co2+ ions free sample, respectively. And then, the UC luminescence intensity was reduced with further increasing Co2+ ions tridoping concentration. The inset of Fig. 3 also shows the enhancement of green and red upconversion emissions as a function of Co2+ ions. The changing trend of each emission was of the same, however, the half-peak width of 4S3/24I15/2 transitions (∼543 nm) emission was changed obviously with respect to the Co2+ doping level, and the changing trend was of the same with the change of the UC luminescence intensity, which showed that 4S3/2 energy level and energy bandwidth had been influenced by Co2+ codoping. In addition, to visualize the improvement of the UC emissions, the photograph of the upconversion luminescence of as prepared NaYF4:20% Yb3+, 2% Er3+, 15% Co2+ NPs (right) and NaYF4:20% Yb3+, 2% Er3+ NPs (left) solution in cyclohexane (0.1 wt%) excited with a 980 nm laser diode (taken by a digital camera without any additional filter) are provided in the inset of Fig. 3. As shown in this figure, NaYF4:20% Yb3+, 2% Er3+, 15% Co2+ NPs exhibits good dispersion, the fluorescent strength is significantly enhanced by codoping Co2+ ions and the changes in fluorescent strength are clearly observed with the naked eye.
image file: c5ra21721k-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Upconversion luminescence spectra of NaYF4:20% Yb3+/2% Er3+/x Co2+ (x = 0–30%). The inset of left low figure shows a digital photo of the 0.1 wt% cyclohexane solution of the as-prepared NaYF4:20% Yb3+/2% Er3+/15% Co2+ sample under the excitation of 980 nm light with a power density of 54 W cm−2.

In order to better understand the fact above, the UC luminescence intensities were measured as a function of excitation power for NaYF4:Yb/Er/Co NPs codoped with 0 and 15 mol% Co2+ shown in Fig. 4. For the unsaturated upconversion process, the number of photons required to populate the upper emitting state can be described by the following relation:22,24

IupINIRn
where Iup is the upconversion emission intensity, INIR is the pump laser intensity, and n is the number of pump photons required. As shown in Fig. 4b, the slopes (n values) obtained were 1.87 ± 0.04, 1.87 ± 0.04 and 1.81 ± 0.07 for 521, 541 and 657 nm emissions in NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ sample with codoping 15 mol% Co2+, which are slightly smaller than n values (1.91 ± 0.04, 1.85 ± 0.03 and 2.43 ± 0.05) for NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs (Fig. 4a). These results indicate that the green and red emissions are all a two-photon processes in both nanocrystals with and without Co2+ ions. The Co2+ ions cannot absorb 980 nm photons and cannot transfer its energy to Er3+, which indicates that the mechanisms for UC radiations have not been affected by introducing of Co2+ ions. And typical energy level for upconversion emission of NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ under 980 nm is shown in Fig. 5. The above phenomenon was different from that of Mn2+ doped NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs,21 so, the ratio of the red and green emission cannot be changed by codoping Co2+, but the intensity of the green and red emission was obviously enhanced.


image file: c5ra21721k-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Pump power dependence of the green and red emission of NaYF4:Yb/Er/Co NPs: (a) 0 mol% Co2+, (b) 15 mol% Co2+.

image file: c5ra21721k-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Energy level diagrams of the Yb3+ and Er3+ ions as well as the proposed UC mechanism for the green and red emission.

Why did the UC luminescence intensity change with different Co2+ tridoping concentration? As well known, the upconversion luminescence intensity of rare earth is mainly dependent on electronic transition probabilities and a hypersensitive transition, however, the electronic transition probabilities are sensitively affected by the local crystal field symmetry of the Er3+ ions, and the hypersensitive transition can be produced by the rare earth of surrounding.25,26 According to the energy level diagram shown in Fig. 5, when absorbing a photon, the electrons of Yb3+ ions on the ground state (2F7/2) are excited to a higher energy level (2F5/2), and subsequently, the energy is transferred to the adjacent Er3+ ions due to the energy overlap of the transition dipoles of the two elements.27 Finally the energy is released by Er3+ ions in the form of light emission and partial heat.29–32 In this through-space interaction, the distance between the Yb3+ and Er3+ ions plays an key role. If the ions are far separated from each other, the energy transfer is not efficient. On the other hand, the closely spaced ions will lead to deleterious cross-relaxation, which decreases the emission efficiency. Thus, the fluorescence emission of the upconverison NPs is affected by the distance between the Yb3+ and Er3+ ions. Furthermore, the change in the upconversion nanocrystal lattice also affects the fluorescence emission.5 Therefore, we deduce that the change of UC emission intensity may come from the fact that doping with a small radius of ions can change the distance between the Yb3+ and Er3+ ions by introducing different concentrations of Co2+ ions. It is well known that substituting of Y3+ (radius = 0.89 Å) ion by the smaller Co2+ ion (radius = 0.72 Å) can caused the host lattice to shrink, whereas occupating the interstitial sites can cause the host lattice to expand.28 The above shrinkage or expand as well as both of them can cause the bond length and trivalent cation space to change; moreover, the symmetry is also caused to change. All of above changes indicate that the surrounding environment of rare hypersensitive transition, and the distance between the Yb3+ and Er3+ ions affect the electronic transition probabilities, furthermore enhance UC luminescence intensity. Therefore, the intensity of normalized decay curve of the 4S3/24I15/2 transition at 541 nm in the samples. All the decay curves of the samples could be well fitted to a single exponential function as, I(t) = I0 + A1[thin space (1/6-em)]exp(−t/τ1), where I and I0 are the luminescence intensity at time t and 0. A1 is constant, t is time, and τ1 is the decay times for the exponential components. The lifetimes of 4S3/2 and 4F9/2 states of Er3+ ions for NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs with introducing 0–30 mol% Co2+ ions were listed in Table 2. It is well known that the inverse of the lifetime is equal to the sum of the radioactive transition and nonradioactive transition. As shown in Table 2, it can be seen that all the lifetimes of the 4S3/2 state of earth has been altered (see ESI Fig. S1). XRD (Table 1) results show that the cell volume decreased with increasing Co2+ ion doping (0–15 mol% Co2+) leading to the decrease in the average Ln3+–Ln3+ bond length, indicating the distance between Er3+–Er3+ or Yb3+–Er3+ is decreased; on the contrary, the cell volume increased with increasing Co2+ ion doping (15–30 mol% Co2+) leading to the increase in the average Ln3+–Ln3+ bond length, which result in the increase of the intensity of upconversion emission. Therefore, upconversion emission can be enhanced by adjusting the Co2+ ions codoping concentration and allowing precise control over the average ionic distance between the trivalent lanthanide dopants.

Table 2 Lifetimes of the 4S3/2 and 4F9/2 states of Er3+ ions for NaYF4:Yb, Er NPs with introducing 0–30 mol% Co2+ ions
Co2+ concentration (mol%) 0 5 10 15 20 30
τ1 (ms) (4S3/2) 0.12 0.43 0.53 0.63 0.48 0.33
τ2 (ms) (4F9/2) 0.17 0.60 0.68 0.82 0.67 0.61


To verify the above results, the decay profiles of 4S3/24I15/2 (541 nm) and 4F9/24I15/2 (657 nm) transition in NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanoparticles with introducing 0–30 mol% Co2+ under the excitation of 980 nm were measured. Fig. 6 shows the distance between Er3+–Er3+ or Yb3+–Er3+. As shown in Fig. S1, the surrounding environment of a certain point of Co2+ 15 mol% sample is the most asymmetric with the crystal structure analysis results. Asymmetric surrounding environment favours NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs with different concentration of Co2+ ions were longer than that of NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs without Co2+ ions, and the longest lifetime of the 4S3/2 state was found in the sample codoping with 15 mol% Co2+ ions. Furthermore, the lifetimes had been prolonged after the Co2+ codoping and the similar changing trend of the enhancement of UC luminescence intensity was observed. The prolonged lifetimes might arise from the tailored local environment of Er3+ ions which was in close agreement with the experimental result shown in Fig. S1.


image file: c5ra21721k-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Decay profiles of 4S3/24I15/2 transition in NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs with introducing 0–30 mol% Co2+ under the excitation of 980 nm.

3.3 Tunable magnetic behaviour

Besides the enhancement of the UC emission, the Co2+ codoped NaYF4 NPs also present particular paramagnetic properties due to the weakly coupled and uncoupled of Co2+ ions. Fig. 7 shows magnetization versus magnetic field (MH) curves for NaYF4 NPs codoped with different Co2+ contents measured at room temperature. The magnetization increased with increasing Co content, showed that all the samples present typical paramagnetic behaviour at room temperature indicating that the Curie temperature (Tc) of this material is below room temperature. The paramagnetic behaviour is mainly attributed to the seven unpaired inner 3d electrons, which are closely bound to the nucleus and effectively shielded by the outer closed shell electrons (4s23d7) from the crystal field.28–32 The magnetic mass susceptibilities of the as prepared NaYF4 nanocrystals doped with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30% Co2+ are 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.11 emu g−1 Oe−1, respectively. The magnetization of the NaYF4 NPs can be modified from 0.30 emu g−1 to 0.67 emu g−1 at 6 T with increasing the Co2+ doping content from 5 mol% to 30 mol%, which is close to the previously reported value for bio-separation based on nanoparticles.33 In addition, the M(H) values at 2 and 300 K for Co2+ doped NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs are shown in Fig. S5. Typical superparamagnetism behaviour is observed at 2 K due to the absence of remanence (Mr) or coercivity (Hc), and the saturation magnetization (Ms) is approximately 13.77 emu g−1 for the sample of 30% Co2+ doped NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs. These results indicate that these multifunctional NPs may have promising potential applications in bio-separation and magnetic resonance imaging.
image file: c5ra21721k-f7.tif
Fig. 7 Magnetization as a function of an applied field for NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs codoped with different Co2+ ions concentration.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, NaYF4:Yb/Er NPs codoped with different concentration of Co2+ ions were first synthesized via a co-thermolysis method using oleic acid as capping ligand and octadecene as solvent. The results show that Co2+ ions codoping in NaYF4:Yb/Er NPs did not change the hexagonal phase structure of nanoparticles, and the size, morphology and dispersibility in nonpolar solvent were all maintained by codoping with Co2+ ions. However, the significant enhancement of the UC emission in NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs by introducing Co2+ ions were observed. Visible green and red intensity of UC emissions in NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs were enhanced by up to 114 and 84 times by introducing 15 mol% Co2+ ions, respectively. Furthermore, the Co2+ codoped NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs also exhibit paramagnetic behavior at room temperature and extra paramagnetic behaviour at low temperature, which is familiar to the properties of Gd3+ doped NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs. Therefore, the Co2+ codoping method not only enhances the intensity of UC emission to a large extent, but also incorporates additional magnetic functionality into these single phase fluorescent materials. Therefore, the synthesized composites may have potential application in in vitro and in vivo dual-modal fluorescent and magnetic bioimaging as well as bioseparation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2572014CB08), The Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant No. E201404), Heilongjiang Province postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. LBH-Z14004).

Notes and references

  1. C. C. Mi, Z. H. Tian, C. Cao, Z. J. Wang, C. B. Mao and S. K. Xu, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 14632 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. Z. Q. Li, Y. Zhang and S. Jiang, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 4765 CrossRef CAS.
  3. H. S. Qian and Y. Zhang, Langmuir, 2008, 24, 12123 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. C. Renero-Lecuna, R. Martín-Rodríguez, R. Valiente, J. González, F. Rodríguez, K. W. Krämer and H. U. Güdel, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 3442 CrossRef CAS.
  5. Q. Q. Dou and Y. Zhang, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 13236 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. C. Dong, A. Korinek, B. Blasiak, B. Tomanek and F. C. J. M. van Veggel, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 1297 CrossRef CAS.
  7. C. F. Gainer, G. S. Joshua, C. R. de Silva and M. Romanowski, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 18530 RSC.
  8. G. Y. Chen, T. Y. Ohulchanskyy, S. Liu, W. C. Law, F. Wu, M. T. Swihart, H. Agren and P. N. Prasad, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 2969 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. L. Cheng, C. Wang and Z. Liu, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 23–37 RSC.
  10. R. Deng and X. Liu, Nat. Photonics, 2014, 8, 10–12 CrossRef CAS.
  11. K. Prorok, A. Bednarkiewicz, B. Cichy, A. Gnach, M. Misiak, M. Sobczyk and W. Strek, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 1855–1864 RSC.
  12. F. Wang, Y. Han, C. S. Lim, Y. H. Lu, J. Wang, J. Xu, H. Y. Chen, C. Zhang, M. H. Hong and X. G. Liu, Nature, 2010, 463, 1061 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. H. J. Hao, M. Qin and P. Li, J. Alloys Compd., 2012, 515, 143 CrossRef CAS.
  14. F. Ahmed, S. Kumar, N. Arshi, M. S. Anwar, B. H. Koo and C. G. Lee, Microelectron. Eng., 2012, 89, 129 CrossRef CAS.
  15. R. Sarkar, C. S. Tiwary, P. Kumbhakar and A. K. Mitra, Phys. B, 2009, 404, 3855 CrossRef CAS.
  16. S. Han, R. Deng, X. Xie and X. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 11702–11715 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. D. Yin, C. Wang, J. Ouyang, K. Song, B. Liu, X. Cao, L. Zhang, Y. Han, X. Long and M. Wu, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 12037–12043 RSC.
  18. G. Tian, Z. Gu, L. Zhou, W. Yin, X. Liu, L. Yan, S. Jin, W. Ren, G. Xing, S. Li and Y. Zhao, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 1226 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. D. Tian, D. Gao, B. Chong and X. Liu, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44(9), 4133–4140 RSC.
  20. P. Ramasamy, P. Chandra, S. W. Rhee and J. Kim, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 8711 RSC.
  21. Q. Cheng, J. Sui and W. Cai, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 779–784 RSC.
  22. Q. M. Huang, J. C. Yu, E. Ma and K. M. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 4719 CAS.
  23. H. Yu, W. Cao, Q. Huang, E. Ma, X. Zhang and J. Yu, J. Solid State Chem., 2013, 207, 170–177 CrossRef CAS.
  24. D. Li, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Dong, L. Liu, G. Shi and Y. Song, J. Appl. Phys., 2012, 112, 09470 Search PubMed.
  25. A. Xia, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. Deng, Q. Chen, S. Wu, X. Huang and J. Shen, Biomaterials, 2014, 35, 9167 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. P. Ramasamy, P. Chandra, S. W. Rhee and J. Kim, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 8711–8717 RSC.
  27. G. Dong, B. Chen, X. Xiao, G. Chai, Q. Liang, M. Peng and J. Qiu, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 4658–4666 RSC.
  28. W. H. Zhang, F. Ding and S. Y. Chou, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24(35), OP236 CAS.
  29. R. Deng and X. Liu, Nat. Photonics, 2014, 8, 10–12 CrossRef CAS.
  30. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Sutradhar, B. J. Sarkar, A. K. Deb and P. K. Chakrabarti, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2012, 100, 081111 CrossRef.
  31. D. Santos and M. A. Macedo, Phys. B, 2012, 407, 3229 CrossRef CAS.
  32. L. Hu, C. de Montferrand, Y. Lalatonne, L. Motte and A. Brioude, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 4349 CAS.
  33. S. Zeng, M. Tsang, C. Chan, K. Wong, B. Fei and J. Hao, Nanoscale, 2012, 4, 5118 RSC.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: X-ray diffraction data, XPS and EDS, M(H) of the Co-doped NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs measurements at 2 and 300 K. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra21721k

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.