Jian Zhoua,
Baisheng Sab,
Zhimei Sun*ac,
Chen Siac and
Rajeev Ahujad
aSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China. E-mail: zmsun@buaa.edu.cn
bCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350100, China
cCenter for Integrated Computational Materials Engineering, International Research Institute for Multidisciplinary Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
dDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden
First published on 24th August 2015
We report that complete spin polarization and controllable spin polarization of carriers can be simultaneously realized in the Heusler alloy Mn2CoAl simply by applying external pressures based on first-principles studies. At ambient conditions, Mn2CoAl is a ferromagnetic spin-gapless semiconductor (SGS) with complete spin polarization. Under hydrostatic pressures up to 40 GPa, Mn2CoAl undergoes a series of electronic transitions from SGS with spin-up as a conducting channel to a ferromagnetic semiconductor and then to SGS with spin-down as a conducting channel and finally to a half metal, during which the magnetic moment remains as 2 μB. Such rich electronic transitions are attributed to different responses of the spin-up and spin-down electrons under pressure. This work highlights a desirable way to control the carrier's spin polarization and provides a new insight into the electron behavior in Mn2CoAl related Heusler alloys under pressure.
On the other hand, the control of carrier's spin polarization, i.e., the ability to induce transition between spin-up and spin-down states of electron spins, is another key issue in spintronics, which forms the basis for spintronics and related solid-state quantum information technologies.12,13 The spin direction can be switched through reversing the spontaneous magnetization by external magnetic field.14 However, this approach is not practical due to strong magnetic field needed and not feasible at nanoscale.15,16 Recently, electric fields were investigated to be another way for manipulating the spins in spintronics,17,18 which practically, however, is a great challenge at some conditions due to the long time (in 100 ns) needed for single-spin rotations.18 Therefore, exploring alternate easy ways to manipulate electron spins is another important topic in spintronics. Overall, it is pivotal for spintronics devices to search for materials with complete spin polarization and tunable carrier's spin polarization via an easy way. We show that such performance can be realized in Mn2CoAl Heusler alloy by simply applying external pressures on the basis of first-principles studies.
The Heusler alloy Mn2CoAl, firstly predicted to be a ferromagnetic half-metal,19,20 was later on experimentally verified to be a spin-gapless semiconductor.21 Mn2CoAl exhibits a high Curie temperature of 720 K which is suitable for room temperature applications. The complete spin polarization of its SGS character makes Mn2CoAl a promising candidate for spintronics in general, such as spin injector, spin photodiodes and spin image detectors.6,10,21,22 Very recently, it has been reported that the SGS character in Mn2CoAl was very sensitive to external strains and dopants,23 indicating that external pressure could be an alternate way to control the carrier's spin in Mn2CoAl as pressure may tune the electronic states around the Fermi level.24–29 In fact, external pressure has been proved to be a feasible way to adjust the crystallographic structures and electronic structures in many material systems.28–30 Here we show that external pressure is a highly desirable way to manipulate the orientation of electron spins in Mn2CoAl Heusler alloy on the basis of first-principles calculations. Our results demonstrate that Mn2CoAl can be simply used in a pressure involved field such as pressure induced spin filter.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 The calculated phonon dispersion curves for Mn2CoAl at various pressures of (a) ambient pressure, (b) P = 38.0 GPa, (c) P = 76.2 GPa. |
The most exciting finding of this work is summarized in Fig. 3a, which shows the band gap Eg of the two type spin electrons for Mn2CoAl under hydrostatic pressures up to 76.2 GPa. It is obvious that the two type spin electrons behave differently under pressures. For the spin-up state, the band gap Eg increases from 0 eV to ∼0.25 eV, while for the spin-down state, the band gap Eg firstly increases with increasing pressures up to ∼8.0 GPa, and then decreases to 0 eV with further increasing the external pressures to 38.0 GPa, above which the spin-down state is metallic. Overall, the effect of external pressures on the electronic structures of Mn2CoAl can be illustrated by the schematic density of states in Fig. 3b. As illustrated from left to right in Fig. 3b, at ambient conditions, the closed band gap in spin-up channel and an open band gap in spin-down channel demonstrates that Mn2CoAl is a SGS rather than a half-metal, in good agreement with the experimental results.21 Under external pressures, Mn2CoAl changes from SGSup (spin-up as conducting channel) to common semiconductor below 38.0 GPa and then to SGSdown (spin-down as conducting channel) at 38.0 GPa and finally to half metal above 38.0 GPa.
Accompanied with this unique electronic transition in Mn2CoAl under pressures the local magnetic moments on Mn, Co and Al atoms show slight changes as seen in Fig. 4, where the total magnetic moment under various pressures is also included. Obviously, MnD atom carries the largest positive local magnetic moment of around 2 μB and Co atom possesses a positive magnetic moment of around 1 μB, whereas MnA atom carries the negative magnetic moments of around −1 μB. The Al atom is nearly unpolarized. Our results agree well with that of Meinert et al.,37 who used the spin polarized relativistic Korringa–Kohn–Rostoker package Munich in their calculations. Even though the absolute values of these local magnetic moments for MnA, MnD and Co atoms decrease slightly with increasing pressures, the total magnetic moment of Mn2CoAl remains as 2 μB independent of the external pressures, in agreement with the Slater–Pauling rule MH = NV − 24, where NV is the number of valence electrons and MH is magnetic moment per unit cell.36,38 Meanwhile, the directions of the magnetic moments are unchanged within the whole investigated pressure range. Our present results clearly show that Mn2CoAl Heusler alloy is a magnetic spin-gapless semiconductor at ambient conditions, and an external pressure of around 38 GPa will reverse the carrier's spin polarization but retains this magnetic spin-gapless semiconductor character. On the other hand, a small external pressure, for example (10 GPa as seen in Fig. 3a), will transform SGS Mn2CoAl to a common semiconductor. In a word, the fantastic inversion of complete spin polarization of carriers under pressures will endow Mn2CoAl Heusler alloy rich performances and multifunctional applications in spintronic devices, such as spin injector, spin filter and spin sensor.
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 The calculated total magnetic moments and magnetic moments on individual atoms under pressures. |
To understand the physical origin of the pressure induced spin transitions in Mn2CoAl, we show in Fig. 5 the spin-resolved band structures under several critical pressures at 0, 8, 38 and 48 GPa, respectively, where the near band edge states around the Fermi level are labeled. At ambient conditions (Fig. 5a), for the spin-up channel, the valence band maximum (VBM) and the conduction band minimum (CBM) touch the Fermi level respectively at Γ point (the Γ1− state) and X point (the X1+ state) showing a closed band gap, while for the spin-down channel, an indirect energy gap is clearly seen where the VBM and CBM also locate at Γ (the Γ2− state) and X (the X2+ state) points, respectively. The feature in Fig. 5a unambiguously demonstrates that Mn2CoAl is a spin-gapless semiconductor with spin-up as the conducting channel. By applying external pressures up to 8 GPa, for spin-up channel, the VBM (Γ1−) and CBM (X1+) move downwards and upwards the Fermi level (Fig. 5b), respectively, opening a band gap and hence leading to a semiconducting state. Meanwhile, the energy of the L1− state increases and while that of the W1+ state remains invariant. With further increasing pressures, the energy of the L1− and X1+ states continuously increase and that of the Γ1− state decreases, whereas the energy of the W1+ state decreases slightly. At 48 GPa, the L1− state has higher energy than the Γ1− state and hence becomes the VBM, while the X1+ state remains as CBM (Fig. 5d). Overall, a band gap is opening in spin-up channel that increases with increasing pressures. For the spin-down states under external pressures, as seen from Fig. 5a and b, the Γ2− state moves slowly towards the Fermi level, and the Γ2+ and X2+ states move rapidly away from the Fermi level, while the X4+ state at just above the CBM moves rapidly downwards the Fermi level. During this period, before the contact of X2+ and X4+, the VBM and CBM are still at Γ2− and X2+, respectively, which results in the increased band gap as shown in Fig. 3a. When the X2+ and X4+ states reach the same energy level at around 8 GPa, Eg of spin-down state reaches the largest value (Fig. 3a). With further increasing pressures at above 8 GPa, the X4+ state continues to move towards the Fermi level and then becomes the CBM, thus the band gap gradually decreases. At 38.0 GPa (Fig. 5c), both Γ2− and X4+ states touch the Fermi level and a closed band gap is obtained for spin-down states. It should be noted that at this stage, the Mn2CoAl alloy transferred from a semiconductor to another SGS with the spin-down as conducting channel. At above 38.0 GPa, the Γ2− and the X4+ states cross the Fermi level and the spin-down state shows a metallic character. Obviously, the different response of various spin orbitals to pressures around the Fermi level results in the change in carrier's spin polarization and the rich electronic transition as shown in Fig. 3. On the other hand, the invariant total magnetic moment under pressures for Mn2CoAl can be understood by the band character in Fig. 5. The magnetism of Mn2CoAl is mainly caused by the band inversion of the Eg band,21 as seen in Fig. 5 the shape of the Eg band is essentially unchanged under pressures, and hence the total magnetism of Mn2CoAl is kept constant as 2 μB. However, distinct different features about the Γ1−, X2+ and W1+ states etc. under pressures are observed in Fig. 5, which result in the slight changes in the magnetism moments of MnA, MnD and Co atoms as shown in Fig. 4.
To unravel the responses of the near band edge states to external pressures in Fig. 5, their electronic orbitals and wavefunctions are calculated and analyzed. Firstly, it is worth to mention that in Mn2CoAl, the closest atomic stacking sequence is MnA–MnD–Co–Al–MnA along the [111] direction, where the atomic distance is 2.48 Å, while the second nearest neighbor is MnA–Co (2.86 Å) and Al–MnD (2.86 Å) along the [100] direction. Therefore, the interaction between atoms along the [111] direction should be much stronger than that along the [100] direction. Secondly, all the near band states consist of 3d orbitals of MnA, MnD and Co atoms as analyzed from the projected band structure in Fig. 6, that is, the L1− state consists of 3d orbitals from MnA–MnD, Γ1− from MnA–Co, X1+ from MnA–MnD–Co, W1+ from MnA–MnD, Γ2− from MnA–MnD–Co, X2− from MnA–Co, X2+ from MnA–Co, X4+ from MnD. To reveal the nature of these critical states, their projected wavefunctions are calculated and plotted in Fig. 7, where if the sign of the face-to-face wavefunctions from two adjacent atoms are the same (opposite), then bonding (antibonding) orbitals are formed. Keep this in mind, the bond nature of the near band edge orbitals illustrated in Fig. 7 are as following: state L1− is antibonding along the [111] direction formed by the nearest MnA and MnD atoms; Γ1− is bonding along the [111] direction by MnA and Al atoms; X1+ is antibonding along the 〈100〉 direction by the next nearest MnA and Co atoms; W1+ is nonbonding since there is no interaction between MnA, MnD and Co atoms; Γ2− is antibonding along the [111] direction by MnA–MnD–Co atoms; X2− is antibonding along the 〈100〉 direction by the next nearest MnA and Co atoms; X2+ is antibonding along [001] and [100] while bonding along [001] by MnA and Co atoms which overall has an antibonding character; X4+ is bonding along [100] by MnD atoms. Combined with Fig. 5, it obvious that under external pressures the antibonding states of L1−, X1+, Γ2−, X2− and X2+ move towards higher energy level and the bonding states of Γ1− and X4+ move towards lower energy level while the energy change of the nonbonding state W1+ is nearly negligible. It is such different response of bonding and antibonding orbitals under external pressures that results in the present found rich electric transitions of Mn2CoAl. This response of bonding and antibonding orbitals under pressures can be approximately understood by the Heitler–London's exchange-energy rule through the molecular-orbital model.39,40 Similar behavior of bonding and antibonding orbitals under external strains has been reported in two-dimensional phosphorene.27
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |