Palladium-catalyzed ligand-free and efficient Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of heteroaryl halides with MIDA boronates in water

Chun Liu *, Xinmin Li , Chao Liu , Xinnan Wang and Jieshan Qiu
State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian University of Technology, Linggong Road 2, Dalian 116024, China. E-mail: cliu@dlut.edu.cn; Tel: +86-411-84986182

Received 29th May 2015 , Accepted 15th June 2015

First published on 15th June 2015


Abstract

A simple and environment-friendly protocol for the palladium-catalyzed ligand-free Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of heteroaryl halides with N-methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA) boronates is developed. The reaction is performed in water as the sole medium and allows the preparation of a variety of heterobiaryls in excellent yields.


Introduction

Heterobiaryls are common structural motifs in natural products, polymers, and functional materials.1 Numerous synthetic methodologies for the synthesis of heterobiaryls have been developed in the past decades. Among the methodologies described in the literature, the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction is one of the most practical methods to prepare these compounds.2 As nucleophilic coupling partner, organoboronic acids are most often utilized in the Suzuki–Miyaura reactions.3 However, arylboronic acids are sp2-hybridized intermediates, which are not monomeric compounds, but rather exist in equilibrium with dimers and cyclictrimers. Thus, many organoboronic acids are waxy solids that are difficult to purify. Besides, some of useful organoboronic acids are inherently unstable, including 2-heterocyclic derivatives, which significantly limit their storage and/or efficient cross-coupling.3b,4 Recently, there has been increased interest in the use of N-methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA) boronates as coupling partners for the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction.5 The MIDA boronates, first mentioned in the late 1980s, offer several positive features associated with their use, including air stability and crystallinity, which are highly appealing to the pharmaceutical industry.6 In 2007, Burke's group7 reported that MIDA could be served as a highly versatile boronic acid protective group, and they also demonstrated how the reactivity was controlled between two different reaction sites in iterative Suzuki–Miyaura reactions of MIDA-protected haloboronic acids. They further found that the MIDA-protected boronates could slowly hydrolyze and release the active boronic acids under mild aqueous basic conditions to take part in the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction.8 Since then, the use of MIDA boronates to the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction has been widened by several groups and shown to be remarkably useful in the synthesis of small molecules and natural product.9 However, most of the reported approaches involved the use of phosphine ligands which are often air-sensitive, expensive and many reactions require proceeding in a toxic organic solvent with a long reaction time. Therefore, the development of an effective, nontoxic, and environmentally friendly system for the MIDA boronates-mediated Suzuki–Miyaura reaction is still an important goal in synthetic organic chemistry.

Water is an abundant, nontoxic, noncorrosive and nonflammable solvent, and the use of water as a sole reaction medium in organic reaction is one of the latest challenges for modern chemists.10 More recently, Lipshutz and co-workers11 reported a room temperature catalytic system for the cross-coupling reactions of aryl halides with aryl/heteroaryl MIDA boronates in water. In the presences of Pd(dtbpf)Cl2 and a polymer phase transfer catalyst TPGS-750-M, the reactions run smoothly with good products yields. Here, we wish to report a simple and aerobic catalytic system for the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of aryl MIDA boronates with heteroaryl halides in pure water without any additive (Scheme 1). This catalytic system, using Pd(OAc)2 as catalyst, (i-Pr)2NH as base, is highly efficient for various substrates.


image file: c5ra10001a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 MIDA boronates mediated Suzuki–Miyaura reaction.

Results and discussion

Optimization of reaction conditions

Initially, the cross-coupling between 2-bromopyridine (0.5 mmol) and phenylboronic acid MIDA ester (0.6 mmol) in 1 mL water was chosen as a model reaction for screening base. The results are shown in Table 1. It is clear that the reaction rate was greatly affected by the base used. All of tested inorganic bases such as K2CO3, K3PO4·3H2O, which are often used in the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of arylboronic acids, exhibited low activity in the present protocol (Table 1, entries 1–4). Subsequently, a series of organic bases were examined. Et3N was the first organic base tested in this system, providing a positive result of a 77% yield of the cross-coupled product in 2 h (Table 1, entry 5). Another base (i-Pr)2NEt provided a similar result as Et3N (Table 1, entry 14). The most efficient base in the present catalytic system is (i-Pr)2NH, which provided a 93% yield in 2 h (Table 1, entry 13). The other tested bases all gave disappointing results (Table 1, entries 6–12). Therefore, the results demonstrate that (i-Pr)2NH is the preferred base in this catalytic system. The reason for the high efficiency is supposed that (i-Pr)2NH acts as not only a base, but also a ligand, which has a much higher tendency to coordinate to palladium to form the active species as reported by Boykin and Tao.12
Table 1 The effect of base on the Suzuki–Miyaura reactiona

image file: c5ra10001a-u1.tif

Entry Base Yieldb (%)
a Reaction conditions: 2-bromopyridine (0.5 mmol), phenylboronic acid MIDA ester (0.6 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol%), H2O (1 mL), base (1 mmol), 100 °C, under air, 2.0 h. b GC yields.
1 K2CO3 38
2 Cs2CO3 36
3 K3PO4·3H2O 51
4 KOH 18
5 Et3N 77
6 Pyridine 20
7 Aniline 13
8 CyNH2 24
9 Cy2NH 35
10 1-Adamantaneamine 24
11 DBU 32
12 i-PrNH2 34
13 (i-Pr)2NH 93
14 (i-Pr)2NEt 74


The next investigation was to optimize the conditions including palladium species and temperature in the same model reaction. As shown in Table 2, the palladium sources have dramatic effects on the reaction activity. It was clear that precatalysts with palladium(II) salts such as Pd(OAc)2 and PdCl2 exhibited high catalytic activity (Table 2, entries 1 and 3). Using 2 mol% Pd(OAc)2 as catalyst, a 93% yield of the cross-coupling product could be obtained (Table 2, entry 1). When the loading of Pd(OAc)2 was decreased to 1 mol%, only a 64% yield was obtained in the same reaction (Table 2, entry 2). The catalytic activity was relatively low using zero-valent palladium sources such as Pd2(dba)3 or Pd/C (Table 2, entries 5 and 6). The effect of the temperature on this reaction was evaluated too. The coupling reactions performed at 80 °C and 120 °C provided the cross-coupled product in 68% and 89% yield, respectively (Table 2, entries 7 and 8). However, 26% and 61% yields were obtained using Pd(PPh3)4 as catalyst under air or nitrogen, respectively (Table 2, entries 9 and 10). Thus, the optimum reaction conditions for this cross-coupling were found to be 2 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 2 equiv. of (i-Pr)2NH, 100 °C in water.

Table 2 The effect of palladium species and temperature on the Suzuki–Miyaura reactiona

image file: c5ra10001a-u2.tif

Entry Catalyst Temperature (°C) Yieldb (%)
a Reaction conditions: 2-bromopyridine (0.5 mmol), phenylboronic acid MIDA ester (0.6 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol%), H2O (1 mL), (i-Pr)2NH (1 mmol), 100 °C, under air, 2.0 h. b GC yields. c Pd(OAc)2 (1 mol%). d N2 atmosphere.
1 Pd(OAc)2 100 93
2 Pd(OAc)2 100 64c
3 PdCl2 100 88
4 PdCl2(CH3CN)2 100 85
5 Pd2(dba)3 100 42
6 Pd/C 100 50
7 Pd(OAc)2 80 68
8 Pd(OAc)2 120 89
9 Pd(PPh3)4 100 26
10 Pd(PPh3)4 100 61d


With the optimized conditions in hand, we further explored the generality of the cross-couplings between arylboronic acid MIDA ester with different nitrogen-based heteroaryl halides and the results are shown in Table 3. The cross-coupling of 2-bromo-5-methylpyridine with phenylboronic acid MIDA ester gave 5-methyl-2-phenylpyridine in a 95% yield after 1 h, showing high efficiency (Table 3, entry 2). Using 2-bromo-5-fluoro-pyridine instead of 2-bromo-5-methylpyridine, the cross-coupling was completed in 1.5 h, resulting in a 94% yield (Table 3, entry 3). Furthermore, 6-substituted-2-bromopyridines were also successfully employed in the cross-coupling reactions, providing high yields (Table 3, entries 4–6). For example, 2-bromo-6-methoxypyridine afforded the expected product in 95% yield within 1 h (Table 3, entry 4).

Table 3 The Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of heteroaryl halides with arylboronic acid MIDA estera

image file: c5ra10001a-u3.tif

Entry Heteroaryl halides MIDA boronates Time (h) Yieldb
a Reaction conditions: heteroaryl halides (0.5 mmol), arylboronic acid MIDA ester (0.6 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol%), H2O (1 mL), (i-Pr)2NH (1 mmol), 100 °C, under air. b Isolated yields. c Pd(OAc)2 (4 mol%).
1 image file: c5ra10001a-u4.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u5.tif 2.0 93
2 image file: c5ra10001a-u6.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u7.tif 1.0 95
3 image file: c5ra10001a-u8.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u9.tif 1.5 94
4 image file: c5ra10001a-u10.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u11.tif 1.0 95
5 image file: c5ra10001a-u12.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u13.tif 1.0 92
6 image file: c5ra10001a-u14.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u15.tif 1.0 94
7 image file: c5ra10001a-u16.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u17.tif 1.0 94
8 image file: c5ra10001a-u18.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u19.tif 1.5 93
9 image file: c5ra10001a-u20.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u21.tif 1.0 95
10 image file: c5ra10001a-u22.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u23.tif 2.5 93
11 image file: c5ra10001a-u24.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u25.tif 1.5 94
12 image file: c5ra10001a-u26.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u27.tif 1.0 91
13 image file: c5ra10001a-u28.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u29.tif 1.0 95
14 image file: c5ra10001a-u30.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u31.tif 2.0 92
15 image file: c5ra10001a-u32.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u33.tif 1.5 95
16 image file: c5ra10001a-u34.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u35.tif 1.5 96
17 image file: c5ra10001a-u36.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u37.tif 1.5 94
18 image file: c5ra10001a-u38.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u39.tif 3.0 91
19 image file: c5ra10001a-u40.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u41.tif 2.5 92
20 image file: c5ra10001a-u42.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u43.tif 4.0 80c
21 image file: c5ra10001a-u44.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u45.tif 4.0 84c
22 image file: c5ra10001a-u46.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u47.tif 4.0 79c
23 image file: c5ra10001a-u48.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u49.tif 12 41c
24 image file: c5ra10001a-u50.tif image file: c5ra10001a-u51.tif 23 Tracec


The Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of 3-bromopyridine with phenylboronic acid MIDA ester proceeded smoothly to give the expected product in excellent yield (Table 3, entry 7). In addition, 5-bromo-2-methoxypyridine afforded a satisfactory 93% yield in 1.5 h (Table 3, entry 8). A 93% yield of product was obtained by using 2-bromoquinoline as a coupling partner in 2.5 h (Table 3, entry 10). To further investigate the scope and limitations of this methodology, we carried out the cross-couplings of different nitrogen-based heteroaryl halides with various arylboronic acid MIDA esters under standard conditions. Both electron-rich and electron-poor arylboronic acid MIDA esters performed the cross-coupling reactions smoothly with heteroaryl bromides, affording the corresponding biaryls in high yields (Table 3, entries 11–17). For example, the cross-coupling between 2-bromopyridine and p-tolylboronic acid MIDA ester provided 94% yield in 1.5 h (Table 3, entry 11). 5-Bromopyrimidine afforded the target product in 95% yield after 1 h (Table 3, entry 13). Noticeably, steric hinderance due to the ortho substituent on the arylboronic acid MIDA ester did not affect the reaction progress. The cross-coupling reaction of o-tolylboronic acid MIDA ester with 2-bromopyridine and 5-bromo-2-methoxypyridine afforded 91% and 92% yields, respectively (Table 3, entries 18 and 19). Another noteworthy result was that the cross-coupling between 2-chloropyridine and phenylboronic acid MIDA ester provided an 80% yield after 4 h in the presence of 4.0 mol% Pd(OAc)2 (Table 3, entry 20). The cross-couplings of 2-chloropyrazine with phenylboronic acid MIDA esters could also gave good results in this system (Table 3, entries 21 and 22). The coupling reaction of 6-methoxy-2-pyridylboronic acid MIDA ester and 5-bromopyrimidine was performed in this system, providing a 41% yield of the desired product in 12 h (Table 3, entry 23), while only a trace amount of product was obtained using 2-bromopyridine as substrate (Table 3, entry 24). Additionally, a gram-scale reaction was carried out (Scheme 2), furnishing 1.31 g of the desired product with an isolated yield of 84%. No significant detrimental effect on the yield was observed upon increasing the reaction scale.


image file: c5ra10001a-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Gram-scale synthesis of the 2-phenylpyridine. Reaction conditions: 2-bromopyridine (10 mmol), phenylboronic acid MIDA ester (12 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol%), H2O (10 mL), (i-Pr)2NH (20 mmol), 100 °C, under air, isolated yield.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed an efficient and convenient protocol for the palladium-catalyzed Suzuki–Miyaura reaction of heteroaryl halides with arylboronic acid MIDA esters in pure water without any additive. This methodology offers a green, novel alternative way for the synthesis of heteroaryl–aryl based compounds. Further work to explore the exact function of (i-Pr)2NH in the system is currently under investigation in our laboratory.

Experimental

General remarks

All commercially available reagents (from Acros, Aldrich, Fluka) were used without further purification. N-Methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA) boronates were prepared from corresponding arylboronic acids following the method reported in the literature.7 All reactions were carried out in air. NMR spectra were recorded on a Brucker Advance II 400 spectrometer using TMS as internal standard (400 MHz for 1H NMR). GC analysis was performed on Agilent GC-7890A with 4-methoxybiphenyl as internal standard. The isolated yield of products were obtained by short chromatography on a silica gel (200–300 mesh) column using petroleum ether (60–90 °C), unless otherwise noted. Compounds described in the literature were characterized by 1H NMR spectra compared with reported data.

General procedure for the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction

A mixture of aryl bromides (0.5 mmol), N-methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA) boronates (0.6 mmol), (i-Pr)2NH (1 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol%), H2O (1 mL) was stirred at 100 °C in air for the indicated time. The reaction mixture was added to brine (10 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo and the yield was determined by GC analysis with naphthalene as internal standard, or the product was isolated by short chromatography.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21276043, 21076034).

Notes and references

  1. (a) A. F. Pozharskii, A. T. Soldatenkov and A. R. Katritzky, Heterocycles in life and society, John Wiley & Sons, 1997 Search PubMed; (b) Y. Liu, K. Ye, Y. Fan, W. Song, Y. Wang and Z. Hou, Chem. Commun., 2009, 3699–3701 RSC; (c) V. F. Slagt, A. H. M. de Vries, J. G. de Vries and R. M. Kellogg, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2009, 14, 30–47 CrossRef.
  2. (a) N. Miyaura and A. Suzuki, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 2457–2483 CrossRef CAS; (b) A. Suzuki, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999, 576, 147–168 CrossRef CAS; (c) T. E. Barder, S. D. Walker, J. R. Martinelli and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 4685–4696 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) C. Liu and W. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2009, 6267–6269 RSC; (e) C. Liu, X. Rao, Y. Zhang, X. Li, J. Qiu and Z. Jin, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 4345–4350 CrossRef; (f) C. Liu, N. Han, X. Song and J. Qiu, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 5548–5551 CrossRef CAS; (g) C. Liu, Q. Ni, F. Bao and J. Qiu, Green Chem., 2011, 5, 1260–1266 RSC.
  3. (a) W. Han, C. Liu and Z.-L. Jin, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 4005–4007 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) D. G. Hall, Boronic Acids: Preparation and Applications in Organic Synthesis, Medicine and Materials, John Wiley & Sons, 2012 Search PubMed.
  4. G. A. Molander, B. Canturk and L. E. Kennedy, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 74, 973–980 CrossRef PubMed.
  5. A. J. J. Lennox and G. C. Lloyd-Jones, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 412–443 RSC.
  6. (a) T. Mancilla, R. Contreras and B. Wrackmeyer, J. Organomet. Chem., 1986, 307, 1–6 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. C. Brown and A. K. Gupta, J. Organomet. Chem., 1988, 341, 73–81 CrossRef CAS.
  7. E. P. Gillis and M. D. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 6716–6717 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. (a) E. P. Gillis and M. D. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 14084–14085 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. J. Lee, K. C. Gray, J. S. Paek and M. D. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 466–468 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. (a) D. M. Knapp, E. P. Gillis and M. D. Burke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6961–6963 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) G. R. Dick, E. M. Woerly and M. D. Burke, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 124, 2721–2726 CrossRef; (c) J. F. M. da Silva, A. F. Y. Perez and N. P. de Almeida, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 28148–28155 RSC; (d) Y. Li, J. Wang, Z. Wang, M. Huang, B. Yan, X. Cui, Y. Wu and Y. Wu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 36262–36266 RSC; (e) J. D. St. Denis, C. C. Scully, C. F. Lee and A. K. Yudin, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 1338–1341 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) E. M. Woerly, J. Roy and M. D. Burke, Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, 484–491 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. (a) C.-J. Li, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 3095–3166 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) C.-J. Li and L. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 68–82 RSC; (c) C.-J. Li and B. M. Trost, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2008, 105, 13197–13202 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. N. A. Isley, F. Gallou and B. H. Lipshutz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 17707–17710 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. (a) B. Tao and D. W. Boykin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 7993–7996 CrossRef CAS; (b) B. Tao and D. W. Boykin, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 4330–4335 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Characterization of cross-coupled products. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra10001a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.