A convenient access to β-iodo sulfone by the iodine-mediated iodosulfonylation of alkenes

Kai Sun*a, Yunhe Lva, Zhonghong Zhua, Yongqing Jianga, Jiejie Qia, Hankui Wua, Zhiguo Zhangb, Guisheng Zhangb and Xin Wang*a
aCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, Henan 455000, P. R. China. E-mail: sunk468@nenu.edu.cn; wangx933@nenu.edu.cn
bCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan normal university, Xinxiang, Henan 453007, P. R. China

Received 19th April 2015 , Accepted 22nd May 2015

First published on 22nd May 2015


Abstract

A novel iodine-mediated intermolecular iodosulfonylation reaction of alkenes for dual C–S and C–I bond formation is described. A series of alkenes could be selectively converted into the corresponding β-iodo sulfones, which are versatile building blocks in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry. Molecular iodine was the iodine source in this reaction.


Difunctionalization of alkenes is a class of significant synthetic transformations that allow for the buildup of molecular complexity in a single procedure.1 Recently, transition-metal-catalyzed difunctionalization of alkenes provided a powerful strategy for the synthesis of two new vicinal chemical bonds simultaneously, and diamination,2 aminooxygenation,3 dioxygenation,4 cyanotrifluoromethylation,5 fluoroamination,6 phosphonofluorination,7 and oxysulfonylation8 have been elegantly demonstrated. Despite the overall efficiency and versatility of these transformations, significant limitations, such as being costly and using toxic metal catalysts, have led to the emergence of a metal-free approach for the difunctionalization of alkenes. Difunctionalization of unsaturated bonds via a radical pathway is an attractive alternative compared to the transition-metal-catalyzed difunctionalization of alkenes.9 Molecular-iodine catalyst, in combination with TBHP as an environmentally benign and inexpensive co-oxidant, has been increasingly explored to substitute of rare or toxic heavy metal oxidants in recent years.10 Simple iodine has a broad transformation ability of functional groups and is used widely in organic synthesis.11 The advantages of iodine are operational simplicity, low cost, and less toxicity. However, research towards the development of iodine-catalyzed/mediated methods for the direct functionalization of C–H bonds is still in its infancy, and further exploration of this fascinating area is highly desirable in synthetic chemistry.12

The sulfonyl group is of great importance in medical chemistry, photovoltaic materials, nonlinear optics, and synthetic chemistry.13 Therefore, it is valuable to develop new strategies to introduce sulfonyl groups to designated molecular frameworks. Difunctionalization of alkenes to incorporate the sulfone group is also an attractive target to pursue. Recently, Lei and co-workers reported an elegant aerobic oxysulfonylation of alkenes using sulfinic acids as the sulfonyl group.8a Similar results were achieved by the Itoh's group using sodium sulfinates as a sulfonyl group promoted by molecular iodine.8b We noticed that β-iodo sulfone was eliminated as a possible intermediate in Itoh's work. β-Iodo sulfone is a versatile building block in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry, as well as a valuable intermediate since the chemical structure can be further elaborated in the construction of a series of useful active molecules. However, a convenient and direct synthetic method for β-iodo sulfone is rare.14,9b Sulfonyl hydrazides have been widely used as reductants and as a source of sulfonylation and arylation.15 With our continuing interest in radical oxidative cross-coupling reactions,16 we now disclose an iodine-mediated intermolecular iodosulfonylation reaction of alkenes using sulfonylhydrazides as the sulfonyl source.17

We started our investigations with styrene 1a and 4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazide 2a as model substrates. Several parameters, such as iodine sources, solvents and temperature, were all analyzed to investigate the impact of the reaction outcome and the results are listed in Table 1. Initially, the reaction of 1a with 2a was performed in EtOAc at 80 °C utilizing molecular iodine and TBHP (70% in water) combinations, but we did not detect the iodosulfonylation product 3a. The unexpected oxysulfonylation product 4 was obtained in 79% yield instead (Table 1, entry 1). To our delight, the reaction gave a low yield of 3a when we decreased the temperature to 40 °C, although 4 was still the main product (Table 1, entry 2). The yield of 3a could be increased to 52% when the reaction was performed at room temperature, and 4 was not detected (Table 1, entry 3). Other iodine sources, such as NaI, KI and nBu4NI, were tested but all of them completely did not work (Table 1, entries 4–6). A variety of solvents were subsequently tested (Table 1, entries 7–11). EtOH was clearly the best choice for this catalytic system and the yield of 3a was improved to 89% (Table 1, entry 9). Moreover, THF was also a good choice for this procedure and gave the desired 3a in 79% yield (Table 1, entry 10). Further screening revealed that the yield of 3a was decreased severely when TBHP was absent (Table 1, entries 12). Obviously, TBHP plays a pivotal role in the catalytic cycle, although the exact reason needs to be revealed.

Table 1 Screening of the reaction conditionsa

image file: c5ra07065a-u1.tif

Entry Iodine source Oxidant Solvent Yield of 3a/4b (%)
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (0.55 mmol), iodine source (0.25 mmol) and TBHP (1.0 mmol) at 0–20 °C for 8 h.b Yield of isolated product.c Reaction performed at 80 °C.d Reaction performed at 40 °C.
1 I2 TBHP EtOAc 0/79c
2 I2 TBHP EtOAc 23/57d
3 I2 TBHP EtOAc 52/0
4 NaI TBHP EtOAc 0/0
5 KI TBHP EtOAc 0/0
6 nBu4NI TBHP EtOAc 0/0
7 I2 TBHP MeCN 20/0
8 I2 TBHP DCE 0/0
9 I2 TBHP EtOH 89/0
10 I2 TBHP THF 79/0
11 I2 TBHP H2O 0/0
12 I2   EtOH 42/0


Using the optimized conditions, we next explored the scope and generality of the process. As shown in Table 2, various substitutents on the benzene ring of styrene were well tolerated such as electron-withdrawing groups (F, Cl, Br and CO2Me) and electron-donating groups (Me and t-butyl). Some of these functional groups are useful for further synthetic diversification. Substitution of groups on the aromatic ring at different positions, such as 2-Cl, 3-Br, 4-F, 4-Cl and 4-Br, did not show obvious yield disparity during this iodine-mediated procedure, thus affording the corresponding iodosulfonylation products in good-to-high yields (72–92%). Notably, the sterically bulky 1,6-dichloro-2-vinylbenzene 1k also reacted smoothly, affording the corresponding β-iodo sulfone 3k in 92% yield. Moreover, 4-methylbenzenesulfonohydrazide, benzenesulfonohydrazide and 4-chlorobenzenesulfonohydrazide were suitable sulfonyl sources and provided the desired products 3l and 3m in high yields (89% and 88%). In addition, the reactivity of several allylbenzene derivatives (1n, 1o, 1p and 1q) was investigated, and the corresponding products 3n, 3o, 3p and 3q were obtained in good yields (88–95%).

Table 2 Scope of styrene and propylenea,b

image file: c5ra07065a-u2.tif

a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), 2 (0.55 mmol), molecular-iodine source (0.25 mmol) and TBHP (1.0 mmol) at 0–20 °C for 5–12 h.b Yield of isolated product.
image file: c5ra07065a-u3.tif
 


Iodosulfonylation of alkenes is an important chemical process because the corresponding products are useful for further transformation. Encouraged by these results, we further investigated the scope of other easily accessible chain and cyclic olefins. As shown in Table 3, pent-1-ene 5a was an effective substrate and gave the desired product 6a in 76% yield. Notably, substrates bearing sensitive substituents, such as 4-bromobut-1-ene 5b, 3-chloroprop-1-ene 5c, methyl acrylate 5d and prop-2-en-1-ol 5e, still provided the desired products in moderate to good yields (71–87%). 2,5-Dihydrofuran 5f was also subjected to the process, thus affording the corresponding 6f in 84% yield. Finally, this reaction could be scaled up to the gram level, which suggests that it can be potentially applied in the chemical industry (eqn (1)).

Table 3 Scope of chain and cyclic alkenesa,b

image file: c5ra07065a-u4.tif

a Reaction conditions: 5 (0.5 mmol), 2a (0.55 mmol), molecular-iodine source (0.25 mmol) and TBHP (1.0 mmol) at 0–20 °C for 8 h.b Yield of isolated product.
image file: c5ra07065a-u5.tif


Having established the scope of the method, a preliminary study on the reaction mechanism was performed. 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxyl (TEMPO) and 2,4-di-tertbutyl-4-methylphenol (BHT), which are well-known radical scavengers, were introduced into the reaction mixture. The reaction progress was severely suppressed and only a trace amount of the desired product 3a can be detected even after longer times (eqn (2)). When the reaction was carried out in the dark, the system was chaotic and no main product was obtained. β-Iodo sulfone 3a, which was eliminated as a possible intermediate in Itoh's work, can convert to β-hydroxy sulfone and β-oxo-sulfone in 27% and 31% yields at 60 °C in our system, respectively (eqn (3)). At present, we assume a radical iodosulfonylation mechanism, although nucleophilic attack on an iodonium intermediate can not be excluded (Scheme 1).

 
image file: c5ra07065a-u6.tif(1)
 
image file: c5ra07065a-u7.tif(2)
 
image file: c5ra07065a-u8.tif(3)


image file: c5ra07065a-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Proposed reaction mechanism.

In conclusion, we reported an iodosulfonylation reaction between alkenes and sulfonyl hydrazides using molecular iodine as the iodine source and sulfonyl hydrazides as the sulfonyl source. This reaction provides an important method for preparing β-iodo sulfones, which are versatile building blocks and valuable intermediates in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry. The features of mild conditions, wide substrate scope and easily scalable operation make this reaction attractive in industrial production. Further mechanistic studies are underway and will be demonstrated in due course.

Notes and references

  1. For selected reviews, see: (a) G. Zeni and R. C. Larock, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 2285 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) K. H. Jensen and M. S. Sigman, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2008, 6, 4083 RSC; (c) R. I. McDonald, G. Liu and S. S. Stahl, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 2981 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) C. Francesca and A. Goti, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 269 CrossRef PubMed.
  2. (a) J. Streuff, C. H. Hovelmann, M. Nieger and K. Muniz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 14586 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) K. Muniz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 14542 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) K. Muniz, C. H. Hovelmann and J. Streuff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 763 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) P. A. Sibbald, C. F. Rosewall, R. D. Swartz and F. E. Michael, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 15945 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) P. A. Sibbald and F. E. Michael, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 1147 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) A. Iglesias, E. G. Pérez and K. Muniz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 8109 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) B. Zhao, H. Du, S. Cui and Y. Shi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 3523 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) B. Zhao, X. Peng, S. Cui and Y. Shi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 11009 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) R. G. Cornwall, B. Zhao and Y. Shi, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 434 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (j) B. Zhao, X. Peng, Y. Zhu, T. A. Ramirez, R. G. Cornwall and Y. Shi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 20890 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (k) M. C. Paderes, L. Belding, B. Fanovic, T. Dudding, J. B. Keister and S. R. Chemler, Chem.– Eur. J., 2012, 18, 1711 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (l) P. Chávez, J. Kirsch, J. Streuff and K. Muniz, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 1922 CrossRef PubMed.
  3. (a) E. J. Alexanian, C. Lee and E. J. Sorensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 7690 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) G. Liu and S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 7179 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) L. V. Desai and M. S. Sanford, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 5737 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) K. Muniz, A. Iglesias and Y. Fang, Chem. Commun., 2009, 5591 RSC; (e) M. C. Paderes and S. R. Chemler, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 1915 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) H. Wang, Y. Wang, D. Liang, L. Liu, J. Zhang and Q. Zhu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5678 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) R. Zhu and S. L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 1926 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) S. D. Karyakarte, T. P. Smith and S. R. Chemler, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 7755 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. (a) Y. Li, D. Song and V. M. Dong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2962 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. Wang, H. Jiang and H. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3846 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) W. Wang, F. Wang and M. Shi, Organometallics, 2010, 29, 928 CrossRef CAS.
  5. (a) H.-W. Zhang, W.-Y. Pu, T. Xiong, Y. Li, X. Zhou, K. Sun, Q. Liu and Q. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2529 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Z.-D. Pan, S. M. Pound, N. R. Rondla and C. J. Douglas, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 20 Search PubMed; (c) H.-F. Jiang, H.-L. Gao, B.-F. Liu and W.-Q. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 15348 RSC.
  6. (a) T. Wu, G. Yin and G. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 16354 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) S. Qiu, T. Xu, J. Zhou, Y. Guo and G. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 2856 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) C. Appayee and S. E. Brenner-Moyer, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 3356 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) H.-T. Huang, T. C. Lacy, B. Blachut, G. X. Ortiz and Q. Wang, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 1818 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) W. Kong, P. Feige, T. Haro and C. Nevado, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2469 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) Z.-D. Li, L.-Y. Song and C.-Z. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 4640 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) H.-W. Zhang, Y.-C. Song, J.-B. Zhao, J.-P. Zhang and Q. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 126, 1 CrossRef PubMed.
  7. (a) W. Liu and J. T. Groves, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 6024 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) C.-W. Zhang, Z.-D. Li, L. Zhu, L.-M. Yu, Z.-T. Wang and C.-Z. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 14082 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. (a) Q. Lu, J. Zhang, F. Wei, Y. Qi, H. Wang, Z. Liu and A. Lei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 7156 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) A. Kariya, T. Yamaguchi, T. Nobuta, N. Tada, T. Miura and A. Itoh, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 13191 RSC.
  9. (a) M. P. Sibi and N. A. Porter, Acc. Chem. Res., 1999, 32, 163 CrossRef CAS; (b) A. P. Schaffner, K. Sarkunam and P. Renaud, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2006, 89, 2450 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) C. E. Hoyle, A. B. Lowe and C. N. Bowman, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 1355 RSC; (d) G. Povie, A.-T. Tran, D. Bonnaffee, J. Habegger, Z. Hu, C. L. Narvor and P. Renaud, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 3894 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) N. Zhang, D.-S. Yang, W. Wei, L. Yuan, Y.-J. Cao and H. Wang, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 37013 RSC; (f) W. Wei, X.-X. Liu, D.-S. Yang, R.-M. Dong, Y. Cui, F. Yuan and H. Wang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2015, 56, 1808 CrossRef CAS PubMed and references therein.
  10. (a) M. Kirihara, Y. Asai, S. Ogawa, T. Noguchi, A. Hatano and Y. Hirai, Synthesis, 2007, 3286 CrossRef CAS; (b) P. Finkbeiner and B. J. Nachtsheim, Synthesis, 2013, 979 CAS.
  11. (a) H. Togo and S. Lida, Synlett, 2006, 2159 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) D. Liu and A. Lei, Chem.– Asian J., 2015, 10, 806 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. (a) R. D. Richardson and T. Wirth, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4402 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) K. Hess, A. Ushmorov, J. Fiedler, R. E. Brenner and T. Wirth, Bone, 2009, 45, 367 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) T. Dohi and Y. Kita, Chem. Commun., 2009, 2073 RSC; (d) J. Zhang, D. Zhu, C. Yu, C. Wan and Z. Wang, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2841 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. M. Altermann, S. Schäfer and T. Wirth, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 5902 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) A. Gogoi, A. Modi, S. Guin, S. K. Rout, D. Das and B. K. Patel, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10445 RSC; (g) F. Xiao, H. Chen, H. Xie, S. Chen, L. Yang and G. J. Deng, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 50 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) Y. Zi, Z. J. Cai, S. Y. Wang and S. J. Ji, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 3094 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) G. Majji, S. K. Rout, S. Guin, A. Gogoia and B. K. Patel, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 5357 RSC; (j) F. V. Singh and T. Wirth, Chem.– Asian J., 2014, 9, 950 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (k) J. Yuan, X. Ma, H. Yi, C. Liu and A. Lei, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 14386 RSC; (l) A. Verma, S. Patel, M. Meenakshi, A. Kumar, A. Yadav, S. Kumar, S. Jana, S. Sharma, C. D. Prasad and S. Kumar, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 1371 CAS.
  13. For select examples of applications of the sulfonyl group: (a) A. V. Ivachtchenko, E. S. Golovina, M. G. Kadieva, V. M. Kysil, O. D. Mitkin, S. E. Tkachenko and I. M. Okun, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54, 8161 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Y. Huang, L. Huo, S. Zhang, X. Guo, C. C. Han, Y. Li and J. Hou, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8904 RSC.
  14. L. M. Harwood, M. Julia and G. L. Thuillier, Tetrahedron, 1980, 36, 2483 CrossRef CAS.
  15. (a) X. Li, X. Xu, P. Hu, X. Xiao and C. Zhou, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 7343 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. Shen, Y. Yuan, S. Song and N. Jiao, Chem. Commun., 2014, 4115 RSC; (c) W. Wei, J. Wen, D. Yang, J. Du, J. You and H. Wang, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 2988 RSC.
  16. (a) K. Sun, Y. Li, T. Xiong, J.-P. Zhang and Q. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 1694 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) G. Li, C.-Q. Jia and K. Sun, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 5198 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) K. Sun, X. Wang, G. Li, Z.-H. Zhu, Y.-Q. Jiang and B.-B. Xiao, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 12880 RSC; (d) X. Wang, K. Sun, Y.-H. Lv, F.-J. Ma, G. Li, D.-H. Li, Z.-H. Zhu, Y.-Q. Jiang and F. Zhao, Chem.– Asian J., 2014, 9, 3413 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) K. Sun, Y.-H. Lv, Z.-H. Zhu, L.-P. Zhang, H.-K. Wu, L. Liu, Y.-Q. Jiang, B.-B. Xiao and X. Wang, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 3094 RSC.
  17. For sulfonyl radicals generated in situ from sulfonyl hydrazides, see: (a) X. Li, X. Xu and C. Zhou, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 12240 RSC; (b) X. Li, X. Xu and X. Shi, Tetrahedron Lett., 2013, 54, 3071 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) W. Wei, C.-L. Liu, D.-D. Yang, J.-W. Wen, J.-M. You, Y.-R. Suo and H. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 10239 RSC; (d) S. Tang, Y. Wu, W. Liao, R. Bai, C. Liu and A. Lei, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 4496 RSC; (e) X. Li, M. Fang, P. Hu, G. Hong, Y. Tang and X. Xu, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 356, 2103 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) J. Zhang, Y. Shao, H.-X. Wang, Q. Luo, J.-J. Chen, D.-M. Xu and X.-B. Wan, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 3312 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra07065a

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.