L. H. Tagle,
C. A. Terraza,
A. Tundidor-Camba and
D. Coll
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Faculty of Chemistry, Organic Chemistry Department, P.O. Box, 306, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: ltagle@uc.cl
First published on 22nd May 2015
Poly(esters) (PEs) derived from diacids containing bulky side groups, which have an halogenated (Cl, Br) imide ring, an aminoacidic residue (glycine, L-alanine, L-valine) and an amide group were obtained with a silicon-containing diphenol. Also PEs without the aminoacidic residue were obtained. PEs were characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy, and the results were in agreement with the proposed structures. PEs were obtained with good yields and moderate or high ηinh values. PEs were soluble in aprotic polar solvents and were swollen in other solvents like m-cresol and THF. The Tg values were determined and it was possible to see a tendency in the sense that when the size of the atom (Cl, Br) bonded to the imidic ring is increased, the Tg values decreased, also for those PEs obtained without the aminoacidic residue. The thermal decomposition temperatures showed that only two PEs can be considered as thermostable, considering TDT values above 400 °C at 10% of weight lost. The other PEs showed good thermal stability, showing in general a decrease of the TDT values when the volume of the side group, is increased. PEs showed UV-vis transparency at 400 nm lower than 20%, but between 500 and 600 nm, showed 80% transparency. PEs containing halogen atoms showed flame retardancy in a simple essay, with respect to PEs without halogen atoms in which the combustion was complete.
There are several structural changes that are possible to introduce into the monomers with the objective to improve the polymeric properties. In this sense the introduction of flexible units in the main or side chain, or cardo groups, are solutions proposed in order to increase the solubility and to decrease the Tg values, but without affecting the thermal stability.10–13
Cardo or bulky side groups have the objective of to reduce the intermolecular interactions between the polymeric chains due to the higher free volume, and consequently it is possible to improve the solubility and to decrease the Tg due to the higher internal mobility of the polymeric chains. One of the groups used with this objective is the imide one.2,5,14
On the other hand, the introduction of flexible groups in the repeating unit also has been used in order to improve the processability. Mallakpour has described poly(esters) with structural modifications, which include amino acids as flexible units with bulky groups and several functional groups, increasing the flexibility due to the central sp3 carbon of the amino acid moiety.15
Silicon-containing condensation polymers also have been developed in order to introduce in the polymeric chain heteroatoms which induce polarity in the main chain due to the difference of electronegativity between Si and C, increasing the solubility. These polymers have been studied for potential applications due to that the Si atom permits a σ–π conjugation when it is between aromatic rings and consequently participate in the electron transport in the polymeric chain.13,16,17 In this sense, Thames16,18 and Bruma19,20 have described silicon-containing polymers, with good solubility in common organic solvents and low Tg values, but maintaining the thermal stability.
The presence of halogen atoms in the polymeric chains also has been studied. In general atoms like Cl or Br can to act as flame retardant because they can remove free radicals, which diminish the burning process.21 Mallakpour has described polymers with this property, including bulky groups and halogen atoms, which led to flame-retardant materials, with good solubility, without affect the thermal properties.22
Continuing our works about the synthesis and characterization of silicon-containing condensation polymers,23–27 in this work we describe the synthesis of poly(esters) (PEs) derived from diacids containing a bulky side group, which have an imidic ring substituted with halogen atoms (Cl or Br), an aminoacidic residue (glycine, L-alanine or L-valine) and an amide group.
These carboxylic imide-acids were polymerized with bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)dimethylsilane and the poly(esters) were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy. The thermal properties, Tg and TDT, were determined and the results were related with the proposed structures. Also UV-vis transparency and flame resistance were determined.
The dicarboxylic imide-amide-acids: 5-(phthalimidyl-acetylamino)-isophthalic acid (H-II-a),28 5-(tetrachlorophthalimidyl-acetylamino)-isophthalic acid (Cl-II-a),34 5-(tetrabromophthalimidyl-acetylamino)-isophthalic acid (Br-II-a),34 5-(2-phthalimidyl-propionylamino)-isophthalic acid (H-II-b),31 5-(2-tetrachlorophthalimidyl-propionylamino)-isophthalic acid (Cl-II-b),34 5-(2-tetrabromophthalimidyl-propionylamino)-isophthalic acid (Br-II-b),34 5-(2-phthalimidyl-4-methyl-pentanoylamino)-isophthalic acid (H-II-c),33 5-(2-tetrachlorophthalimidyl-4-methyl-pentanoylamino)-isophthalic acid (Cl-II-c),34 and 5-(2-tetrabromophthalimidyl-4-methyl-pentanoylamino)-isophthalic acid (Br-II-c),34,35 were obtained from the respective carboxylic phthalimidyl- or tetrahalophthalimidyl-acids according to a general procedure, in which the carboxylic imide acid was mixed with thionyl chloride in order to obtain the acid chloride, which reacted with 5-amino-isophthalic acid. The mixture was poured in 10% HCl solution, and the solid filtered, washed with water and dried until constant weight (Scheme 1). The nature of all compounds was verified by IR and 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.
The dicarboxylic imide-acids: 5-phthalimidyl-isophthalic diacid (H-III),28 5-tetrachlorophthalimidyl-isophthalic diacid (Cl-III),38,39 and 5-tetrabromophthalimidyl-isophthalic diacid (Br-III),34 were obtained by reaction of the respective phthalic- or tetrahalophthalic-anhydrides and 5-amino-isophthalic acid (Scheme 2) according to the same former procedure already described. The nature of all compounds was verified by IR and 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy.
The diphenol bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)dimethylsilane was synthesized from 4-bromophenol and dimethyldichlorosilane, according to a describe procedure.36
O imide), 1735 (C
O ester), 1699 (C
O amide), 1596, 1577 (C
C arom.), 1454 (CH3), 1425 (Si–C arom.), 1371 (Si–C aliph.), 1102 (O–C arom.), 839 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 820 (arom. p-subst.). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.59 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 4.54 (s, 2H, CH2) (5), 7.34 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.64 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 7.87–7.91 (m, 4H, arom.) (3, 4), 8.46 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.56–8.60 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 11.10 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −3.4 (21), 38.7 (5), 120.6 (18), 122.6 (3), 124.7 (15), 129.5 (13), 130.3 (2), 130.8 (4), 134.0 (14), 134.6 (20), 135.0 (12), 144.6 (19), 150.7 (17), 162.4 (16), 165.1 (10), 166.7 (1). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.84 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C32H24N2O7Si) (576.64 g mol−1): C: 66.65%, H: 4.20%, N: 4.86%. Found: C: 66.46%, H: 4.28%, N: 4.61%.
O imide), 1735 (C
O ester), 1637 (C
O amide), 1588, 1559 (C
C arom.), 1450 (CH3), 1425 (Si–C arom.), 1370 (Si–C aliph.), 1109 (O–C arom.), 916 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 824 (arom. p-subst.). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.58 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 1.57 (s, 3H, CH3) (6), 4.99 (m, 1H, CH) (5), 7.32 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.62 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 7.84 (m, 4H, arom.) (3, 4), 8.44 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.70 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 10.41 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.6 (21), 14.9 (6), 48.9 (5), 121.3 (18), 123.1 (3), 125.5 (15), 129.3 (13), 130.3 (2) 131.8 (4), 134.4 (14), 135.3 (20), 135.6 (12), 140.0 (19), 151.6 (17), 163.5 (16), 167.2 (10), 168.4 (1). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.85 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C33H26N2O7Si) (590.66 g mol−1): C: 67.10%, H: 4.44%, N: 4.74%. Found: C: 67.15%, H: 4.39%, N: 4.64%.
O imide), 1742 (C
O ester), 1606 (C
O amide), 1589, 1545 (C
C arom.), 1496 (CH3), 1467 (Si–C arom.), 1368 (Si–C aliph.), 1111 (O–C arom.), 915 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 834 (arom. p-sust.). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.23 (s, 3H, CH3) (21), 0.53 (s, 3H, CH3) (21′), 0.83–0.88 (d, J = 17.7 MHz, 6H, CH3) (9), 1.40 (m, 1H, CH) (8), 2.00 (m, 1H, CH2) (7), 2.13 (m, 1H, CH) (7′), 4.94 (m, 1H, CH) (5), 7.27 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.58 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 7.82–7.87 (m, 4H, arom.) (3, 4), 8.42 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.67 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 10.41 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −3.4 (21), 20.2 (9), 22.38 (9′), 23.9, (8), 36.2 (7), 51.07 (5), 120.7 (18), 122.6 (3), 124.7 (15), 127.3 (13), 129.3 (2), 133.5 (4), 133.9 (14), 134.5 (20), 134.8 (12), 139.2 (19), 150.8 (17), 162.7 (16), 166.9 (10), 167.5 (1). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −8.01 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C36H32N2O7Si) (632.74 g mol−1): C: 68.34%, H: 5.10%, N: 4.43%. Found: C: 68.25%, H: 5.07%, N: 4.39%.
IR (KBr) (cm−1): 3467 (NH), 3089 (CH arom.), 2952 (CH3), 1778, (C
O imide), 1727 (C
O ester), 1588 (C
C arom.), 1453 (Si–C arom.), 1372 (Si–C aliph.), 1110 (O–C arom.), 877 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 834 (arom. p-subst.). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.6 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 7.36 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.64 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 7.95 (m, J = 25.5, 4H, arom.) (3, 4), 8.6 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 8.78 (s, 1H arom.) (15). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.3 (21), 121.4 (18), 123.5 (3), 125.5 (15), 128.1 (13), 130.5 (2), 131.5 (4), 134.3 (14), 134.8 (20), 135.3 (12), 135.7 (19), 151.4 (17), 163.0 (16), 166.6 (1). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.79 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C30H21NO6Si) (591.58 g mol−1): C: 69.35%, H: 4.07%, N: 2.70%. Found: C: 69.30%, H: 4.11%, N: 2.28%.
O imide), 1727 (C
O ester), 1628 (C
O amide), 1598 (C
C arom.), 1450 (CH3), 1416 (Si–C arom.), 1371 (Si–C aliph.), 1110 (O–C arom.), 914 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 833 (arom. p-subst.), 680 (C–Cl). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.41 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 4.12 (m, 1H, CH2) (5), 6.32 (s, 4H arom.) (18), 6.85 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 8.04 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.91 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 10.39 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.0 (21), 42.9 (5), 123.3 (18), 123.4 (15), 127.4 (13), 128.9 (2), 129.9 (3), 137.2 (14), 137.3 (4), 139.6 (20), 140.7 (12), 147.5 (19), 153.4 (17), 160.3 (1), 160.5 (16), 164.8 (10). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.80 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C32H20Cl4N2O7Si) (714.40 g mol−1): C: 53.80%, H: 2.82%, N: 3.92%. Found: C: 53.84%, H: 2.78%, N: 3.89%.
O imide), 1727 (C
O ester), 1627 (C
O amide), 1588, 1513 (C
C arom.), 1451 (Si–C arom.), 1368 (Si–C aliph.), 1391 (CH3), 1110 (O–C arom.), 914 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 825 (arom. p-subst.), 680 (C–Cl). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.58 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 1.59 (d, 3H, CH3) (6), 5.04 (m, 1H, CH) (5), 7.32 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.62 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 8.45 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.69 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 10.42 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.7 (21), 14.4 (6), 49.1 (5), 121.3 (18), 125.4 (15), 128.0 (13), 128.1 (2), 130.1 (3), 135.2 (14), 137.6 (4), 138.4 (20), 139.8 (12), 145.3 (19), 151.4 (17), 162.6 (1), 163.4 (16), 167.6 (10). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.82 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C33H22Cl4N2O7Si) (728.43 g mol−1): C: 54.41%, H: 3.04%, N: 3.85%. Found: C: 54.39%, H: 3.17%, N: 3.79.
O amide) 1725 (C
O ester), 1626 (C
O amide), 1587, 1570 (C
C arom.), 1452 (CH3), 1419 (Si–C arom.), 1371 (Si–C aliph.), 1111 (O–C arom.), 910 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 834 (arom.-p-subst.), 680 (C–Cl). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.60 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 0.92 (d, 6H, CH3) (9), 1.57 (m, 1H, CH) (8), 2.28 (m, 2H, CH2) (7), 5.00 (m, 1H, CH) (5), 7.33 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.64 (d, 4H, arom.) (19), 8.46 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.70 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 10.52 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.7 (21), 20.7 (9), 20.9 (9′), 23.1, (8), 36.73 (7), 52.4 (5), 121.4 (18), 123.8 (15), 125.4 (13), 128.0 (2), 128.3 (3), 135.3 (14), 137.5 (4), 138.5 (20), 145.5 (12), 149.5 (19), 151.4 (17), 163.0 (1), 163.4 (16), 167.5 (10). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.80 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C36H28Cl4N2O7Si) (770.51 g mol−1): C: 56.12%, H: 3.66%, N: 3.64%. Found: C: 56.23%, H: 3.54%, N: 3.71%.
IR (KBr) (cm−1): 3434 (NH), 3071 (CH arom.), 1786, (C
O imide), 1735 (C
O ester), 1588, 1587 (C
C arom.), 1451 (Si–C arom.), 1369 (Si–C aliph.), 1108 (O–C arom.), 918 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 824 (arom. p-sust.). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.60 (s, 3H, CH3) (21), 7.35 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.64 (s, 4H arom.) (19), 8.55 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.83 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.7 (21), 121.3 (18), 125.4 (15), 128.0 (13), 128.2 (2), 128.4 (3), 130.7 (14), 132.5 (4), 135.3 (20), 135.7 (12), 138.6 (19), 151.3 (17), 162.2 (1), 162.8 (16). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.8 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C30H17Cl4NO6Si) (657.35 g mol−1): C: 54.82%, H: 2.61%, N: 2.13%. Found: C: 54.79%, H: 2.57%, N: 2.22%.
O imide), 1728 (C
O ester), 1626 (C
O amide), 1597 (C
C arom.), 1450 (CH3), 1414 (Si–C arom.), 1371 (Si–C aliph.), 1108 (O–C arom.), 914 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 832 (arom. p-sust.), 669 (C–Br). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C32H20Br4N2O7Si) (892.22 g mol−1): C: 43.08%, H: 2.26%, N: 3.14%. Found: C: 43.19%, H: 2.21%, N: 3.03%.
O imide), 1724 (C
O ester), 1627 (C
O amide), 1587, 1560 (C
C arom.), 1451 (CH3), 1408 (Si–C arom.), 1370 (Si–C aliph.), 1108 (O–C arom.), 822 (arom. p-sust.), 918 (arom. 1,3,5-sust.), 669 (C–Br). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.58 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 1.55 (d, 3H, CH3) (6), 5.04 (m, 1H, arom.) (5), 7.32 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.62 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 8.45 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.68 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 10.36 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.11 (21), 14.95 (6), 49.71 (5), 121.1 (18), 122.0 (3), 126.0 (15), 128.5 (13), 130.6 (14), 131.5 (4), 135.8 (20), 136.1 (12), 137.1 (19), 140.4 (2), 151.9 (17), 163.5 (1), 163.9 (16), 168.3 (10). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.80 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C33H22Br4N2O7Si) (906.25 g mol−1): C: 43.74%, H: 2.45%, N: 3.09%. Found: C: 43.78%, H: 2.39%, N: 3.10%.
O, imide), 1723 (O–C arom.), 1627 (C
O amide), 1587, 1544 (C
C arom.), 1450 (CH3), 1424 (Si–C arom.), 1368 (Si–C aliph.), 1109 (C–O ester), 916 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 823 (arom. p-sust.), 681 (C–Br). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.59 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 0.90–0.91 (m, 6H, CH3) (9, 9′), 1.56 (m, 1H, CH) (8), 2.06 (m, 1H, CH2) (7), 2.28 (m, 1H, CH2) (7′), 4.99 (m, 1H, CH) (5), 7.33 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.63 (d, 4H, arom.) (19), 8.46 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 8.69 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 10.42 (s, 1H, NH) (11). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.8 (21), 23.2 (9), 25.0 (9′), 26.5, (8), 39.0 (7), 54.8 (5), 122.8 (18), 123.4 (3), 127.5 (15), 128.4 (13), 129.9 (14), 132.3 (4), 132.9 (20), 137.3 (12), 137.6 (19), 138.8 (2), 153.6 (17) (C arom.), 165.3 (1), 165.5 (16), 169.6 (10). 29Si NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −7.10 (22). Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C36H28Br4N2O7Si) (948.33 g mol−1): C: 45.60%, H: 2.98%, N: 2.95%. Found: C: 45.63%, H: 2.92%, N: 2.89%.
O imide), 1730 (C
O ester), 1587 (C
C arom.), 1495 (CH3), 1452 (Si–C arom.), 1370 (Si–C aliph.), 1107 (O–C arom.), 917 (arom. 1,3,5-subst.), 821 (arom. p-sust.), 673 (C–Br). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): 0.60 (s, 6H, CH3) (21), 7.36 (s, 4H, arom.) (18), 7.65 (s, 4H, arom.) (19), 8.56 (s, 2H, arom.) (13), 8, 82 (s, 1H, arom.) (15), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) (δ) (ppm): −2.8 (CH3) (21), 122.9 (18), 123.3 (3), 130.0 (15), 132.4 (13), 132.9 (14), 133.1 (4), 135.4 (20), 137.4 (12), 137.8 (19), 138.8 (2), 153.5 (17), 162.3, 162.7 (C
O). 29Si NMR (δ) (ppm) (DMSO-d6): −7.83. Elemental analysis. Calculated: (C30H17Br4NO6Si) (835.17 g mol−1): C: 43.14%, H: 2.05%, N: 1.68%. Found: C: 43.16%, H: 2.00%, N: 1.53%.
PEs were obtained with almost quantitative yields (94–98%) and the particular values for each run are summarized in Table 1. Apparently, the presence of the halogen atoms in the phthalic ring moiety does not affect the final reactivity of the dicarboxylic aids.
| Yield (%) | [α]Da (°) | ηinhb (dL g−1) | Tg (°C) | TDT (°C) | Rcc (%) | LOId | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a In N,N-dimethylformamide at 25 °C.b Inherent viscosity, in NMP at 25 °C (c = 0.5 g dL−1).c Residue at 800 °C.d Limiting oxygen index.e nd: not determined. | |||||||
| H-PE-a | 94 | — | 0.27 | 219 | 402 | 44 | 35.1 |
| H-PE-b | 95 | −43 | 1.03 | 160 | 375 | 33 | 30.7 |
| H-PE-c | 96 | −31 | 0.23 | 70 | 380 | 27 | 28.3 |
| Cl-PE-a | 98 | — | 0.48 | 154 | 338 | 40 | 33.5 |
| Cl-PE-b | 98 | −51 | 0.76 | 96 | 353 | 30 | 29.5 |
| Cl-PE-c | 95 | −28 | 0.35 | 146 | 288 | 32 | 30.3 |
| Br-PE-a | 97 | — | 0.75 | 114 | 234 | 28 | 28.7 |
| Br-PE-b | 98 | −39 | 0.39 | 96 | 329 | 27 | 28.3 |
| Br-PE-c | 97 | −25 | 0.45 | nd | 341 | 22 | 26.3 |
| H-PE | 94 | — | 0.35 | 110 | 403 | 24 | 27.1 |
| Cl-PE | 97 | — | 0.27 | nd | 372 | 39 | 33.1 |
| Br-PE | 95 | — | 0.45 | 105 | 367 | 32 | 30.3 |
The structure of the repetitive unit of the polymers was characterized by means of elemental analysis and spectroscopic techniques. Thus, the C, N and H percentage contents in all samples are in agreement with the expected values.
The IR spectra showed the disappearance of the O–H stretching band associated to a carboxylic acid group and the appearance of a new band between 1740–1724 cm−1 corresponding to the C
O stretching of the ester group. Other specific absorption bands for the polymers are listed in the Experimental Part.
When it corresponds, the 1H NMR spectra showed the aliphatic signals of the aminoacidic residue with the expected and integration values. All PEs showed a singlet at about 0.5 ppm provided by the two CH3 groups magnetically equivalent bonded to the Si atom of the diphenol moiety. The silicon atom shifts the signal at high field due to its lower electronegativity in relation to the carbon atom. For the same polymers, the aromatic zone was very complex due to the overlapping of signals. Thus, the AB systems proposed for H18 and H19 appear like a broad singlet, however, the integration values were in agreement with the hydrogen number atoms.
The signals in 13C NMR spectra of polymers were assigned based on the spectra of monomers. The aromatic region presents a great number of C aromatic and the CH3 groups bonded to the Si atom appear between −2.1 and −3.4 ppm due to the electronic effect of the heteroatom above discussed. The spectra clearly show at low magnetic field the carbonyl groups provided by the amide, imide and ester functions that ratified the structure of the polymeric samples.
For all PEs the 29Si spectra were obtained, which showed only one signal at about −7 and −8 ppm approximately. This shift has been described in compounds in which the silicon atom is part of a –Ph–Si(CH3)2–Ph-unit.38 Fig. 1 shows as an example the 1H, 13C and 29Si NMR spectra of PE-Cl-b.
When the formation of films was attempted, the products were brittle materials and inadequate for mechanical tests.
All the PEs including L-alanine and L-valine showed optical rotation (levorotatory) and the results are summarized in Table 1.
| Polymer | DMSO | NMP | DMF | DMAc | m-Cresol | THF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a +: soluble at room temperature. ±: soluble at 40 °C. H: swollen. ±H: only a part of the sample was soluble at 40 °C, the rest was swollen. −: insoluble. | ||||||
| H-PE-a | + | + | + | + | H | H |
| Cl-PE-a | + | + | + | ±H | H | H |
| Br-PE-a | H | + | H | + | H | H |
| H-PE-b | ±H | + | ±H | ± | H | H |
| Cl-PE-b | ±H | + | ±H | ±H | H | H |
| Br-PE-b | ± | + | + | + | H | H |
| H-PE-c | + | + | + | + | H | H |
| Cl-PE-c | + | + | + | + | H | H |
| Br-PE-c | + | + | + | + | H | H |
| H-PE | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Cl-PE | + | + | + | + | ± | ± |
| Br-PE | + | + | + | + | − | + |
Table 1 also shows the inherent viscosity values (ηinh), obtained in NMP at 25 °C and 0.5 g dL−1 as concentration. The registered values were moderate to high, obtaining the highest value for H-PE-b of 1.03 dL g−1. In general, the highest ηinh values were obtained for PEs for which the monomeric diacids were soluble in pyridine at room temperature. The higher solubility would be transferred to the polymer in the reaction media, which permits the growing of the chains. The monomer solubility can be conditioned to the volume of the halogen atoms, in the sense that when it volumes increased, the carboxylic diacids have higher separation which would permit good solvation. This effect can be observed for PEs including glycine (a) or L-valine (c), but not for those with L-alanine (b) in which the ηinh values decreases when the size of the halogen increases. In this aspect, the effect of the amino acid was not clear.
On the other hand, if the nature of the amino acid is considered, also it is possible to see a tendency. When the volume of the side group is increased, the Tg values decreases, due probably to a less symmetry and higher chain flexibility. This fact would imply less packing forces inter-chains which permit the segmental motions and consequently lower Tg values. The exception was Cl-PE-c, including L-valine as aminoacidic residue.
In general the same behavior was observed for poly(amides) derived from the same dicarboxylic acid with an aromatic diamine containing Si as central atom.28,34
The thermal degradation temperatures (TDT) of the PEs were determined, for which was considered the temperature at which the polymer lost 10% of weight. In general, a polymer is considered as thermostable when the weight loss is less than 10% at 400 °C.
According to the above definition, only two PEs can be considered as thermostable, H-PE-a and H-PE. The other PEs showed lower values, but can be considered with good thermal stability, due principally to the great aromatic content of the repeating unit and the micropolarity contributed by the Si–C bond. If the influence of the amino acid is considered, there is not a clear tendency of the TDT values. However, when the influence of atoms bonded to the imidic ring is analyzed, it is possible to see that when the size of these atoms is increased (H, Cl, Br), the TDT values decreased. Thus, the polymeric series with Br shows the lowest TDT values with Cl-PE-c as the only exception to this rule which showed a very low TDT value.
It is possible that when the size of the halogen atom is increased from H to Br, the distance between the polymeric chains also increased due to the higher volume of the imidic side group. According to this, the interactions between the chains are lower and the degradation process occurs at lower temperatures. The same situation was possible to see in the PEs without the aminoacidic moiety. In general, the exception was the same to that observed for the Tg values. Fig. 3 shows the results obtained for the degradation process for PEs which include L-alanine in the structure. Also there are included the respective derivative curves where is possible to evidence the main degradation process of the chains at lower temperature for the halogenated samples PE-H-b.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 Thermal degradation process for poly(esters) PE-H-b, PE-Cl-b and Br-PE-b (20 °C min−1 under N2 flow). | ||
Table 1 also shows the residue (%) of the thermogravimetric analysis at 800 °C, which probably corresponds principally to silicon oxide, but without to discard other inorganic compounds due to the analysis was in N2 atmosphere.
For these PEs, the transparence at 400 nm was lower than 20%, but between 510 and 640 nm all polymers showed 80% of transmittance. On the other hand, the cut-off wavelength of the samples is very similar and the obtained values are between 325 and 388 nm with the exception of Br-PE-b which presented a lower value. These results are summarized in Table 3, and the transparence curves are shown in the Fig. 4.
| PEs | T400 (%) | λT = 80% (nm) | λcutoff (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H-PE-a | 15.7 | 574 | 336 |
| H-PE-b | 20.8 | 564 | 325 |
| H-PE-c | 3.7 | 555 | 359 |
| H-PE | 2.7 | 561 | 362 |
| Cl-PE-a | 3.7 | 556 | 330 |
| Cl-PE-b | 1.9 | 561 | 331 |
| Cl-PE-c | 0.2 | 634 | 388 |
| Cl-PE | 0.6 | 577 | 335 |
| Br-PE-a | 0.6 | 577 | 342 |
| Br-PE-b | 16.8 | 517 | 285 |
| Br-PE-c | 1.7 | 580 | 338 |
| Br-PE | 8.2 | 506 | 335 |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 UV-vis transparency curves for poly(esters) Cl-PE-a, Cl-PE-b, Cl-PE-c, Cl-PE (NMP solution, 0.5 g dL−1 and 15 °C). | ||
| LOI = 17.5 + 0.4R |
Also in this work a very simple essay was made, consisting in to put the PE for 10 seconds in the flame. For all the PEs containing Cl or Br when the flame was eliminated, the combustion was stopped immediately. For those PEs without halogen atoms in the repeating unit, the combustion continued until the complete disappearance of the material.
PEs were obtained with good results yields and moderated ηinh values. The solubility was good in polar aprotic solvents and some of them in THF. Almost of them showed swollen in THF and m-cresol. These results were analyzed respect to the presence of the halogen atom and when it corresponded, to the nature of the aminoacidic moiety. In all cases, the different interactions between the chains and therefore their solubility, was related to the size of the halogen atom and side group of the aminoacidic moiety.
The Tg and TDT values showed a tendency in the sense that when the size of the halogen atom is increased, the values decrease, due to the higher distance between the polymeric chains, which increases their flexibility and diminishes the interactions between them.
PEs showed UV-vis transparence between 500 and 600 nm approximately and those containing halogen atoms autoextinction when were put at the flame.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |