Efficacy of dihydroxy-mercaptopyrimidine functionalized polymeric resin for the trace determination of Cd by SPE coupled flame atomic absorption spectrometry

Aminul Islam*, Noushi Zaidi, Hilal Ahmad and Suneel Kumar
Analytical Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India-202 002. E-mail: aminulislam.ch@amu.ac.in; Tel: +91 9358979659

Received 19th February 2015 , Accepted 30th April 2015

First published on 4th May 2015


Abstract

A novel 2-thiobarbituric acid functionalized polystyrene resin has been explored for its efficacy and applicability in solid phase preconcentration coupled atomic absorption spectrometric determination of trace cadmium. The prepared resin was characterized by infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and thermogravimetry. The maximum static sorption capacity of the prepared resin was 131.58 mg Cd g−1 resin with a low preconcentration limit of 2.5 μg L−1. The experimental parameters affecting the solid phase extraction of cadmium including sample pH, sorption time, flow rate for sorption and desorption, volume and concentration of the eluent, sample volume and concomitant ions were investigated. Under the optimized conditions, <0.008 standard deviation was observed in the absorbance of the quantitatively recovered 1 μg mL−1 Cd even in the presence of common matrix ions. The linearity was maintained between 2.5–90.0 μg L−1 with R2 = 0.999. The good precision of the method was assessed by the resulting average inter column and inter day coefficient of variations of 3.34% and 3.07%, respectively. The accuracy of the method was verified by determining the Cd content in the Standard Reference Material (SRM) NIES-10c and by recovery experiments in spiked real samples. The proposed method was successfully used to preconcentrate cadmium from commonly consumed samples like cigarettes, rum, coffee, tap water and water after reverse osmosis with >96% recovery.


1. Introduction

Cadmium is a ubiquitous heavy metal pollutant1,2 well known for its diverse toxic effects on human health since 1969 (ref. 3) including nephrotoxicity, carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, and endocrine and reproductive toxicity.4,5 Cadmium toxicity has also been associated with the deregulation of cell homeostasis and interference with essential metals.6 The Food Additives Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) joint expert committee on food additives recommended a provisional tolerable daily cadmium intake from combined water, food and air sources to be 1.0 μg kg−1 body weight.7 Also, the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for cadmium in drinking water as set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is 0.005 mg L−1.8 These limits promote the indispensable monitoring of cadmium concentration in various kinds of real food and feed samples. However in practice, humans frequently encounter samples with trace cadmium concentrations. In spite of this, cadmium potentially exhibits numerous undesirable effects on health and accumulates over time in the blood, kidneys, and liver, primarily because of its low rate of excretion from the body attributed to its long biological half-life of 15–30 years.9 This necessitates the accurate evaluation of trace cadmium in complex sample matrices of environmental or biological samples.

In fact the determination of toxic and even essential heavy metals at trace or ultra-trace levels in complex sample matrices is one of the most challenging tasks for analysts all over the world. As a solution to this preconcentration/separation of the analyte ion, it is coupled prior to analysis by sophisticated analytical techniques.10 This adjunct alleviates matrix effects and at the same time increases the analyte concentration, and enhances the analytical detection limit and accuracy of the results, improving its representative nature and facilitating calibration.11–13 Among the sophisticated analytical techniques, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) has been widely used for its advantages of less spectral interference by concomitants and relatively lower running costs instead of expensive flameless techniques which are usually much more sensitive to interference.14–16

The solid phase extraction (SPE) of metal ions has gained rapid acceptance as a preconcentration/separation step.17–22 SPE provides the possibility to selectively extract analytes from complex real matrices, with quantitative sorption and elution, good retention capacity, a high preconcentration factor and regeneration of resins for its reusability with good reproducibility of the sorption characteristics. SPE has quoted advantages over classical solvent extraction, namely avoiding the use of large volumes of carcinogenic organic solvent, emulsion formation caused by the mutual solubility between the organic solvent and aqueous layer and analyte loss during multi-step extraction.23,24 The SPE of metal ions using chelating resins is a green approach since it does not involve the use of environmentally toxic organic solvents along with its frequently quoted advantages.25,26 Commercial polymers like Amberlite XAD series resins,27,28 Merrifield peptide resins,22,29 Chelex-100,30 silica31–33 etc. are established as efficient solid supports available for anchoring chelating ligands. Chelating resins can be tailor made by immobilizing appropriate chelating agents on the support matrix either through surface sorption or chemical modification.34,35 Chelating resins prepared by chemical linkage exhibit better resistance to the leaching of the ligands and are preferable due to their triple function in chelate formation, ion exchange, and physical adsorption.

2-Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) or 4,6-dihydroxy-2-mercaptopyrimidine contains three mobile H atoms and three donor atoms: S, O, and N. The ability of TBA to form transition metal complexes coordinated with its donor atoms has already been demonstrated.36,37 Its application has been reported in the analytical field before.38,39 However, none of the screened literature regarding TBA has taken into account its usage in solid phase extraction as a chelating resin for the extraction of metal ions.

Considering the above we have designed a polymeric resin abbreviated as PTB, by chemically linking TBA with a chloromethylated polystyrene resin (PS) for the purpose of developing a SPE method for the accurate determination of toxic cadmium. The resin was then characterized, systematically optimized and explored for its application in the separation/preconcentration of Cd in real samples coupled with subsequent FAAS determination.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Instrumentation

The determination of cadmium in an integrated mode was done with an automatic flame control GBC 932+ atomic absorption spectrometer (Dandenong, Australia) with deuterium background correction. The operating parameters are enlisted in Table 1. The pH adjustments were done using an Orion 2 star model pH meter from Thermo Scientific (MA, USA). A glass column (1 × 10 cm) fitted with a sintered disc, for dynamic studies, was obtained from J-SIL Scientific Industries (Agra, India). For static studies a thermostated mechanical shaker-NSW-133 (New Delhi, India) at 120 strokes min−1 was used. The FT-IR spectral studies were performed using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum Two spectrometer (MA, USA), using the KBr disk method in the range 400–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 2.0 cm−1, while the far IR measurements were obtained with a Perkin Elmer spectrometer, Frontier (MA, USA) in a polyethylene pellet under nitrogen atmosphere at room temperature (27 °C). TGA/DTA was run on a Shimadzu TGA/DTA simultaneous measuring instrument, DTG-60/60H (Kyoto, Japan). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images for microstructural observations and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDS) spectra for micro compositional analysis of the resin were examined with a Jeol JSM-6510LV (Tokyo, Japan) after being coated with a gold overlayer to avoid charging during electron irradiation.
Table 1 Operating parameters set for FAAS for the determination of Cd
Wavelength (nm) 228.8
Slit width (nm) 0.5
Lamp current (mA) 6
Working range (μg mL−1) 0.2–1.8
Flame composition Air[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]acetylene


2.2 Reagents and solutions

All chemicals used were of the highest available purity or at least analytical reagent grade (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Triple distilled water (TDW) was used throughout the experiments. The pH adjustments were made using HCl/Glycine (pH 1.2–3.6), CH3COOH/CH3COONa (pH 4.0–6.0), Na2HPO4/C6H8O7 (pH 7.0–7.8), and NH4Cl/NH3 (pH 8–10) buffer solutions. A stock solution of cadmium nitrate (1000 mg L−1) was purchased from Merck (Mumbai, India). The PS and TBA were procured from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinem, Germany) and Merck (Mumbai, India), respectively. The SRM rice flour NIES-10c was obtained from the National Institute of Environmental Studies (Ibaraki, Japan). All of the laboratory glassware was treated with 1% HNO3 for 24 h, and then rinsed well with distilled water.

2.3 Preparation of PTB

The PTB chelating resin was prepared by covalently immobilizing 2-thiobarbituric acid on chloromethylated polystyrene, following the reaction scheme depicted in Fig. 1. 5.0 g of the PS was left in 50 mL dimethylformamide (DMF) for an hour for proper swelling. 2.8 g of the TBA reagent was completely solubilized in 30 mL DMF. After mixing the two, the reaction mixture was refluxed for 24 h in a 250 mL round bottom flask containing 5 mL triethyl amine. The host polymeric resin was functionalized by TBA by the nucleophilic elimination of a chloride ion. The reaction mixture was then filtered under suction and washed sequentially with DMF and TDW to remove any unreacted TBA and excess HCl, respectively. The obtained PTB chelating resin was dried at 50 °C for 12 h before any further use.
image file: c5ra03163j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Scheme for the preparation of PTB chelating resin.

2.4 Procedure for extraction of Cd by PTB

Batch ‘static’ procedure. A 50 mL solution of a suitable Cd concentration was equilibrated with 100 mg of the chelating resin for an optimized time. The pH of the solution was adjusted by adding 5 mL of the corresponding buffer solution. After equilibration the sorbed Cd was eluted by an optimized eluent acid. The eluate was then subjected to FAAS determination. The supernatant was also simultaneously analyzed. The amount of Cd sorbed was calculated using the following equation:
image file: c5ra03163j-t1.tif
where Q is the amount of the metal ion sorbed (mg g−1); C0 and C are the concentrations (mg L−1) of the metal ion before and after equilibration, respectively; V is the volume of solution (L); and W is the weight of the dry resin (g). The chelating resin was neutralized with TDW before the next metal ion equilibration.
Column ‘dynamic’ method. The column method was preferred for the experiments dealing with trace or ultra-trace concentrations of Cd. 200 mg of PTB was water-soaked and the slurry packed in the column (bed height of 1.0 cm). The PTB packed column was conditioned to the desired pH with 5.0 mL of the corresponding buffer solution. Depending on the experiment concerned, suitable aliquots of the buffered metal ion solutions were passed through the column at the optimized conditions. The bound metal ion was stripped off the column with 5 mL of eluent acid. The concentration of the metal ion in the eluate was subsequently determined by FAAS.

2.5 Samples and SRM pretreatment

In the case of cadmium, it enters the organism primarily via the alimentary and/or respiratory tract.40 Owing to its high toxicity it is highly desirable to accurately evaluate the concentration in samples consumed on a daily basis by humans. For this reason five types of regularly consumed real samples were analyzed to assess the applicability of the developed analytical method. Tap water (filtered through a cellulose membrane filter of 0.45 μm pore size) and RO water (drinking water after reverse osmosis) were collected (500 mL) from the laboratory. The samples like coffee, cigarettes and rum were purchased from a local market (Aligarh, India). To create representative samples from the purchased quantities, equal portions from different batches of the same brand were considered. One gram of coffee, tobacco from three cigarettes after removing their filters, and 100 mL of rum were digested by wet oxidation using conc. HNO3, HClO4 and 30% H2O2.22,41 The digested residue of each sample obtained was dissolved in 2 mL of 0.5 M HNO3 and made up to 100 mL each. The decomposition of 2747 mg of NIES-10c was done by following the procedure reported in earlier work.42 The digested residue of the SRM was also dissolved in 2 mL of 0.5 M HNO3 and made up to 100 mL. The samples and SRM were then subjected to the optimized preconcentration procedure followed by subsequent FAAS determination.

3. Results and discussions

3.1 Characterization

In the FT-IR spectrum of the prepared resin (Fig. 2A) the characteristic peaks appearing at 3433 cm−1 correspond to structural O–H (–COH) stretching vibrations43 and the peak at 3024 cm−1 is due to N–H stretching vibrations of the secondary amine of the ligand.43,44 The peaks at 1177 and 1644 cm−1 are associated with CO and phenolic C–O stretching vibrations, respectively,43 and the peak at 1265 cm−1 is associated with the C–N stretching vibration of the secondary amine group.43 The band at 1448 cm−1 is assigned to the stretching of CC bonds43 and the peak at 1601 cm−1 corresponds to amine N–H bending.43 The appearance of the medium intensity peak at 756 cm−1 corresponds to C–S stretching vibrations. In addition, the peaks at 2850 and 2921 cm−1 are assigned to aliphatic C–H and aromatic C–H stretching vibrations, respectively.43,44 In the FIR spectrum of the metal chelated resin obtained after Cd sorption (Fig. 2B), Cd–S stretching frequencies lie in the range 298–205 cm−1 and the peaks at 535 cm−1 and 128 cm−1 indicate stretching vibrations of Cd–N and Cd–O in the complex, respectively.45,46 The EDS spectra obtained from the SEM images of PTB and their corresponding elemental weight% are shown in Fig. 3, illustrating the presence of N, O and S atoms of the immobilized ligand along with C of the polymeric matrix and complexed Cd, and confirming the incorporation of TBA onto the prepared resin and its complexation with cadmium. The TGA/DTA curve (ESI graphics 1) shows a slight weight loss after 50 °C, which is likely due to evaporation of sorbed water molecules from resin beads and the degradation of the resin commences only above 300 °C, where a 73% weight loss was observed at 352 °C. It is noteworthy that the prepared chelating resin is thermally stable up to 320 °C.
image file: c5ra03163j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (A) FT-IR spectrum of the PTB resin; (B) far IR spectrum of the Cd complexed PTB resin.

image file: c5ra03163j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Elemental mapping of PTB from EDS spectra; insets correspond to SEM micrographs of (A) the PTB resin and (B) the Cd complexed PTB resin.

3.2 Univariate approach for optimization

For PTB to be employed as a beneficial Cd extractant, the cadmium ion should be easily, quantitatively, and reproducibly collected and eluted. The main parameters required for the development of a SPE method were optimized using the univariate approach.
Effect of pH. To understand the effect of ionic strength (H+ and OH) on the sorption/separation of metal ions, a 500 mg L−1 solution of each metal ion (Cd(II), Pb(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II)) was equilibrated with PTB following the above mentioned batch procedure. The influence of solution pH (2–9) on the sorption of the studied metal ions is shown in Fig. 4. A pH > 9 was not studied due to the probable hydroxide formation. It was observed that the sorption maximum for Cd (103.42 mg g−1) was obtained at pH > 7 while only 27–35% of the maximum was uptaken in the pH range of 4–7 and <10% was sorbed at pH 2–3. The other metal ions also exhibited their maxima for sorption capacity in a basic range. This observation was due to the fact that the metal proton competition for the basic chelating site at a lower pH does not facilitate the chelation of the metal ion. As the pH of the solution increases and reaches neutrality, the concentration of H+ ions decreases and the metal ion becomes more dominant in the solution. A pH > 7 favors metal chelation because of the negligible competitive protons and the simultaneous increase in basicity of the TBA ligand. TBA exists as cationic (H2TBA+), neutral (HTBA) and anionic (TBA) species in acidic, neutral and basic pH ranges, respectively.47
HTBA ⇌ H+ + TBA

HTBA + H+ ⇌ H2TBA+

image file: c5ra03163j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Effect of pH on the sorption of metal ions by the PTB resin at pH 2–9.

The high sorption capacity of Cd at pH 8–9 is attributed to the presence and involvement of the soft bases thioamide N and thiocarbonyl S, along with the supporting ether –O in chelate formation with the soft acid Cd.48,49 As a result the optimized pH 8 ± 0.1 was used for all further experiments. Fig. 4 concludes the much higher uptake of Cd compared to other metal ions. Fe(II) results in immediate hydroxide precipitate formation at such a basic pH; it was not studied beyond pH 3. Also the borderline acids’ equilibration, Pb(II) and Cu(II), ended in slight hydroxide formation at this basic pH. The lower uptake of Co(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) was accounted for by the non-preference of these borderline acids by the soft bases N and S involved in the chelate formation.48,49 In conclusion suppression of the interference of these metal ions in the determination of Cd is expected at pH 8 ± 0.1.

Effect of contact time. The sorption kinetics were studied by equilibrating 500 mg L−1 of Cd solution in the time range of 10–80 min. ESI graphics 2 depicts that 20 min was required for 50% saturation (t1/2) of the total uptake capacity while there was no significant increase in the uptake capacity beyond 50 min. The time of 50 min was sufficient for the complete accessibility of the active sites by the analyte to achieve the saturation level. Hence the optimized equilibration time of 50 min was used in all subsequent experiments.
Effect of flow rate for sorption/desorption of Cd. The quantitative sorption and recovery of Cd is dependent on the flow rate of the sample as well as the eluent, respectively. The effect of the column flow rate was investigated by varying the flow rate of the sample and eluent in the range of 1.0–5.0 mL min−1 and 1.0–3.0 mL min−1, under the optimum conditions, respectively. The sorption of Cd was unaffected up to a flow rate of 4.0 mL min−1 as the metal ion was sufficiently retained by the hydrophilic chelating sorbent. At a high sorption flow rate the retention of Cd gradually decreases by 18% due to the decrease in equilibration time between the two phases. The elution flow rate was unaffected up to 2 mL min−1. Hence the optimized flow rates were 4 mL min−1 for sorption and 2 mL min−1 for elution, respectively.
Type of eluent and reusability studies. The complete quantitative recovery of sorbed Cd was studied using nitric acid and hydrochloric acid at different volume and concentration combinations. 5 mL of 2 M HCl resulted in >98.5% recovery of retained Cd. In conclusion 5 mL of 2 M HCl was used as an eluting agent in further studies.

The reusability of the PTB resin was checked by successive sorption/desorption cycles. It was observed that there was no significant decrease in the uptake of Cd up to 52 cycles. On the next cycle the capacity decreases by 6.3% and gradually went down with subsequent sorption/desorption. The reproducible capacity value up to 52 cycles established the negligible leaching of TBA, reusability and utility of PTB for the separation/preconcentration of Cd from real samples.

3.3 Sorption isotherms

The sorption isotherm fundamentally describes the initial sorbate concentration as the driving force to overcome the mass transfer resistance between the two phases and is vital in designing a sorption system. The sorption mode of Cd was investigated by equilibrating model solutions of constantly increasing Cd concentration from 500–800 mg L−1 so that the sorption saturates and no further sorption occurs. The isotherm models relate the amount of solute sorbed at equilibrium per unit of sorbent weight, qe (mg g−1), to the equilibrium sorbate concentration, Ce (mg L−1). To obtain the better fitted isotherm model the obtained equilibrium data were treated with the following linearized equations for both the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.50
image file: c5ra03163j-t2.tif

image file: c5ra03163j-t3.tif

The data obtained after treatment are listed in Table 2. The close agreement of capacity determined by the Langmuir model with the experimentally obtained value and the higher value of R2 for the Langmuir than Freundlich model suggested that the Langmuir model fits to the present data (ESI graphics 3 and 4). Hence the applicability of the Langmuir isotherm model was confirmed, which assumes the uniform and monolayer sorption of sorbate ions onto the sorbent surface. The essential characteristic of the Langmuir isotherm was further described using a separation factor RL, which is defined as:

image file: c5ra03163j-t4.tif
where C0 is the initial concentration (mg L−1). The favorable sorption of Cd by PTB was confirmed by the fact that for all the initial concentration values, 0 < RL > 1 (ESI Table 1).

Table 2 Isotherm parameters obtained for Cd sorption by the PTB resin
  Langmuir model Freundlich model
qm (mg g−1) 131.58 59.93
Kb (L mg−1) 0.05
n 7.69
R2 0.999 0.835


3.4 Spectral interference studies

The preconcentration/determination of Cd by the prepared chelating resin in the real samples can be substantially affected by various potential concomitants through precipitate formation, redox reactions, or competing complexation reactions, either of interferent anions with the analyte metal ion or of the metal ions in the matrix with the sorbent. Moreover, in the presence of alkali, alkaline earth metals and certain anions exhibit interferences in the FAAS determination. To rule out this effect, the possible interference of common ions on the absorbance of 5 μg of Cd after the proposed SPE method was investigated (Table 3). The individually evaluated interference was considered positive if the interferents caused more than ±5% error range in the observed absorbance of the analyte. No significant differences in absorbance were obtained between samples with and without interferent. This demonstrates the applicability of the developed column method using the PTB chelating resin for preconcentration of trace Cd, effectively separating the analyte from potentially interfering matrix constituents for successive FAAS determination.
Table 3 Effect of various interfering ions on the absorbance of 1 μg mL−1 Cd after preconcentration in the presence of common concomitant ions (analyte amount 5 μg, eluent volume 5 mL, pH 8 ± 0.1, sample volume 100 mL, resin amount 200 mg)
Foreign ions Added as Interferent[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]analyte Absorbance ± Sa % Recoveryb (RSD)
a Standard deviation.b N = 3.
0[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]5 0.314 ± 0.007
Cl NaCl 7600 0.314 ± 0.006 100.0 (2.054)
Br KBr 8200 0.313 ± 0.005 99.8 (1.742)
PO43− Na3PO4 2200 0.309 ± 0.005 98.4 (1.722)
NO3 NaNO3 3000 0.312 ± 0.008 99.2 (2.612)
CO32− Na2CO3 2200 0.314 ± 0.005 100.0 (1.620)
SO42− Na2SO4 2200 0.304 ± 0.006 96.8 (1.953)
Na+ NaCl 5000 0.314 ± 0.007 100.0 (2.054)
K+ KBr 4000 0.313 ± 0.005 99.8 (1.742)
Ca2+ CaCl2 8000 0.314 ± 0.005 100.0 (1.620)
Mg2+ MgCl2 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 0.312 ± 0.008 99.2 (2.612)
Cr3+ CrCl3 5 0.314 ± 0.003 100.0 (1.104)
Co2+ Co(NO3)2 5 0.314 ± 0.004 100.1 (1.231)
Cu2+ Cu(NO3)2 5 0.309 ± 0.007 98.3 (2.241)
Fe3+ Fe(NO3)3 5 0.315 ± 0.002 100.3 (0.664)
Ni2+ Ni(NO3)3 5 0.313 ± 0.003 99.7 (0.998)
Zn2+ ZnCl2 5 0.310 ± 0.004 98.8 (1.311)
Pb2+ Pb(NO3)2 5 0.313 ± 0.005 99.8 (1.567)


3.5 Preconcentration studies

For the determination of trace Cd the preconcentration step is researched in order to simplify the treatment of a representative sample, separate the matrix, lower the detection limit, facilitate calibration, and enhance the accuracy of the results.15 The quantitative characteristics of preconcentration51 described by recovery, the concentration coefficient (K) and the separation coefficient (S) were investigated by running varying volumes of test solutions (500–2500 mL) such that the total amount of analyte is constant at 5 μg. For the test solution of 2000 mL with a corresponding Cd concentration of 2.5 μg L−1, it was found that the recovery was 100% with K and S values of 400 and 2.5 × 10−3, respectively. The obtained values of these quantitative characteristics explain the application of the proposed SPE method in the efficient determination of trace Cd by a sophisticated analytical technique like FAAS even in samples with a concomitant matrix effect.

3.6 Analytical performance

The analytical characteristics of the developed method were determined at optimal column procedure conditions and instrumental parameters. The calibration curve for Cd was constructed after preconcentration of a series of standards containing a suitable aliquot of Cd in a 100 mL solution. The linearity was observed in the range of 2.5–90.0 μg L−1 with the correlation coefficient R2 = 0.999 corresponding to the regression equation of A = 0.3107CCd + 0.0001. The precision of the method was assessed by both inter column and inter day experiments by running 3 replicates of 50 μg L−1 Cd between three columns and for three consecutive days, respectively. The resulting average column to column and day to day coefficient of variation for the method was found to be 3.34% and 3.07%, respectively. The limit of detection and limit of quantification (with a mean blank absorbance of 0.0094) were evaluated as 3Sb/m and 10Sb/m (where Sb and m are the standard deviation of the mean blank absorbance signal and the slope of the calibration equation, respectively)52 and considering the preconcentration factor53,54 of 20, these were found to be 1.30 and 4.35 μg L−1 for 20 replicate blank runs. A procedural blank run was performed, applying the recommended column procedure with 100 mL of aqueous solution prepared by adding a suitable buffer (excluding metal ions) and finally eluting the same in 5 mL before subjecting it to FAAS determination. The presence of systematic and constant errors in the proposed Cd preconcentration procedure was ruled out by analysis of the SRM and recovery experiments in spiked real samples, respectively. The results shown in Table 4 highlight that even in the presence of many diverse concomitant ions in the analyzed SRM, the developed SPE coupled FAAS method has no systematic errors. Calculated Student’s t (t-test) values for Cd(II) were found to be less than critical Student’s t values (4.303, n = 3) at a 95% confidence level. Hence the mean value was not statistically significant from the certified values indicating the absence of bias in the present method. In order to evaluate the matrix effects and affirm the absence of constant errors, the real samples were spiked with a varying amount of the analyte ion and were analyzed by the same optimized method (Table 5). The recovery of spiked Cd was observed to be >97% which would have been impossible without the addition of such a preconcentration step coupled to subsequent FAAS determination.
Table 4 Analytical results for FAAS determination of Cd in the SRM after PTB column preconcentration
SRM Composition (μg g−1) Certified value (μg g−1) Founda (μg g−1) Calculated Student’s t valueb
a Standard deviation.b At a 95% confidence level, N = 3.
NIES-10c Cd: 1.82 ± 0.06, P: 0.335 ± 0.008, K: 0.275 ± 0.010, Mg: 0.125 ± 0.008, Ca: 95 ± 2, Mn: 40.1 ± 2.0, Zn: 23.1 ± 0.8, Fe: 11.4 ± 0.8, Na: 14.0 ± 0.4, Rb: 5.7 ± 0.3, Cu: 4.1 ± 0.3, Mo: 1.6 ± 0.1, Ni: 0.30 ± 0.03, Cl: 230, Al: 1.5, Br: 0.5, Sr: 0.2, As: 0.15, Cr: 0.08, Se: 0.07, Co: 0.007, Hg: 0.005 1.82 ± 0.06 1.79 ± 0.06 0.933


Table 5 Analytical results for FAAS determination of Cd in real samples after PTB column preconcentration
Samples Amount spiked Amount found RSDa % Recovery
a N = 3.b Not detected.
Tap water (μg L−1) 0 4.43 4.56
10 14.33 3.90 98.97
20 24.31 3.86 99.36
RO water (μg L−1) 0 NDb
10 10.23 4.38 102.33
20 20.37 4.05 101.87
Rum (μg L−1) 0 7.33 2.62
50 56.43 2.13 98.21
100 103.76 2.03 96.43
Cigarette (μg unit−1) 0 1.33 4.88
1 2.31 3.30 98.11
2 3.33 3.32 99.74
Coffee (μg g−1) 0 NDb
2 2.13 2.35 106.63
5 5.14 1.60 102.79


3.7 Application of the PTB-FAAS method

The practical utility of the developed SPE method was validated by analysis of Cd in real samples usually consumed on a daily basis (Table 5). The analysis resulted in the presence of 1.33 μg Cd per cigarette (length 69 mm) absorbing about 30% of that into the lungs of the smoker, leaving the remaining 70% in the atmosphere to be inhaled by others or to contaminate the environment. This concludes that smoking will explicitly increase the daily intake of cadmium and supports the fact that smokers have about twice as much cadmium in their bodies as that of non-smokers. On the basis of the observed reports, coffee and drinkable RO water provide a very small proportion of the provisional tolerable weekly intake of 7.0 μg kg−1 body weight recommended by the FAO/WHO.7 In the case of tap water, the presence of a cadmium content (4.87 μg L−1) close to the MCL might be due to the presence of cadmium as an impurity in the zinc of galvanized pipes or cadmium-containing solders in fittings, and taps. The 7.33 μg L−1 of cadmium in rum makes this advisory to limit daily consumption. From this inference it could be concluded that a daily consumption of a pack of cigarettes (10 cigarettes) combined with a glass of rum (250 mL) by an average body weight human of 70 kg would alone contribute to 8.3% of the provisional tolerable daily intake. However, the toxicity of cadmium is dependent on many other factors also.

3.8 Comparison with other SPE methods

The comparative data from some recent publications on separation/preconcentration of trace Cd on different types of solid phase extractors are shown in Table 6. The proposed procedure has advantages for the parameters of sorption capacity, preconcentration limit and reusability over other reported SPE coupled FAAS methods. In comparison with SPE coupled sophisticated instrumental techniques, this simple FAAS procedure exhibited better performance for certain parameters such as sorption capacity, preconcentration factor and reusability. Therefore, the new prepared PTB chelating resin is a powerful alternative to other sorbents for preconcentration and FAAS determination of Cd at trace levels in real samples.
Table 6 Comparison of other recently published SPE methods for trace Cd determination
Sorbent pH SCa (mg g−1) PFb PLc (μg L−1) Reusability (cycles) Techd Samples Ref.
a Sorption capacity.b Preconcentration factor or concentration coefficient.c Preconcentration limit or separation coefficient.d Techniques.
PTB chelating resin 8 ± 0.1 131.58 Theoretical 400 2.5 52 FAAS Water and others This work
123.09 Experimental
Dowex Marathon C 3.5 6.90 Theoretical 250 10 10 FAAS Water and food 55
Ion imprinted Schiff-functionalized silica-supported hybrid sorbent 5.0 29.1 Experimental 9 FAAS 31
Guanidin groups on SBA-15 silica 5.0 36 ± 0.6 Experimental 100 20 FAAS Water and food 32
Ionic liquid [C4MIM][PF6] on silica sorbent 8.5 12.5 Experimental 133 25 >51 FAAS Water and food 33
Functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes 7.0 86 Experimental 360 5.5 FAAS Water and herbs 16
Aminated-CoFe2O4/SiO2 nanoparticles 8.0 5.0 Theoretical 50 0.2 45 HG-AFS Water 56
2-methacryloylamido cysteine polymer 5.0 254 Theoretical GFAAS 57


4. Conclusions

The prepared PTB chelating resin followed by the outlined SPE method resulted in efficient preconcentration of highly toxic cadmium. The efficient coupling of the PTB column with monoelemental FAAS determination presented an alternative to other expensive instrumentation and sophisticated analytical techniques. Furthermore, at the optimized conditions, the PTB-FAAS method did not exhibit any spectral interference in the subsequent Cd determination even in the presence of major concomitant transition metal cations, alkali or alkaline earth metals and their associated counter ions. The merits of easy preparation, low cost, high sorption capacity, low preconcentration limit, selective environmentally innocuous desorption method, precision, accuracy and linearity make the prepared PTB resin an ideal choice for solid phase preconcentration of cadmium in real samples of common consumption.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the University Grant Commission (UGC) India, for providing a senior research fellowship to Noushi Zaidi (UGC-SRF) and Hilal Ahmad (UGC-BSR). The authors acknowledge the support provided by the UGC-SAP program and DST (FIST & PURSE), New Delhi.

References

  1. S. E. Manahan, Environmental Chemistry, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 6th edn, 1994 Search PubMed.
  2. J. S. Watson, Separation Methods for Waste and Environmental Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, 1999 Search PubMed.
  3. C. Baird, Environmental Chemistry, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 2nd edn, 1999 Search PubMed.
  4. A. Sigel, H. Sigel and R. K. O. Sigel, Metal ions in life sciences, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2011 Search PubMed.
  5. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Proceedings of the meeting of the IARC Working Group on beryllium, cadmium, mercury and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry, Scand. J. Work, Environ. Health, 1993, 19, 360–363 Search PubMed.
  6. H. Hu, Harrison′s Principles of Internal Medicine, McGraw Hill, Medical Publishing Division, New York, 16th edn, 2005 Search PubMed.
  7. FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 505, 1997, 32.
  8. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 816-F-09-004, May 2009.
  9. L. Jraup, M. Berglund, C. G. Elinder, G. Nordberg and M. Vahter, Scand. J. Work, Environ. Health, 1998, 24, 1–51 Search PubMed.
  10. T. Lum, Y. Tsoi and K. S. Leung, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29, 234–241 RSC.
  11. E. Jackwerth, A. Mizuike and Y. A. Zolotov, Pure Appl. Chem., 1979, 51, 1195–1211 Search PubMed.
  12. K. Pyrzynska and M. Trojanowicz, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1999, 29, 313–321 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. A. Mizuike, Enrichment Techniques for Inorganic Trace Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 1983 Search PubMed.
  14. A. Islam, H. Ahmad, N. Zaidi and S. Yadav, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, 186, 5843–5853 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. A. Islam, N. Zaidi, H. Ahmad and S. Kumar, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2015, 22, 7716–7725 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. M. Behbahani, A. Bagheri, M. M. Amini, O. Sadeghi, M. Salarian, F. Najafi and M. Taghizadeh, Food Chem., 2013, 141, 48–53 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. A. Islam, A. Ahmad and M. A. Laskar, Anal. Methods, 2011, 3, 2041–2048 RSC.
  18. P. N. Nomngongo and J. C. Ngila, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 46257–46264 RSC.
  19. J. Zou, X. Ma, Y. Dang and Y. Chen, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29, 1692–1697 RSC.
  20. A. Islam, M. A. Laskar and A. Ahmad, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2013, 185, 2691–2704 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. H. He, J. He, H. Lee, H. He, H. Dai and J. Peng, Analyst, 2014, 139, 2459–2466 RSC.
  22. A. Islam, H. Ahmad, N. Zaidi and S. Kumar, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 13257–13265 CAS.
  23. J. S. Fritz, Analytical solid-phase extraction, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1999, p. 264 Search PubMed.
  24. C. F. Poole, New trends in solid-phase extraction, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem., 2003, 22, 362–373 CrossRef CAS.
  25. R. K. Sharma, Pure Appl. Chem., 2001, 73, 181–186 CrossRef CAS.
  26. T. P. Rao, R. S. Praveen and S. Daniel, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 2004, 34, 177–193 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. D. Kara, A. Fisher and S. J. Hill, Analyst, 2006, 131, 1232–1240 RSC.
  28. R. Saxena and P. L. Meena, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 20216–20225 RSC.
  29. J. J. Boruah, S. P. Das, S. R. Ankireddy, S. R. Gogoi and N. S. Islam, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 2944–2959 RSC.
  30. P. N. Nomongongo, J. C. Ngila, T. A. M. Msagati and B. Moodley, Phys. Chem. Earth, 2013, 66, 83–88 CrossRef PubMed.
  31. H. Fan, J. Liu, H. Yao, Z. Zhang, F. Yan and W. Li, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 369–378 CrossRef CAS.
  32. L. Hajiaghababaei, T. Tajmiri, A. Badiei, M. R. Ganjali, Y. Khaniani and G. M. Ziarani, Food Chem., 2013, 141, 1916–1922 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. M. Gharehbaghi and F. Shemirani, Anal. Methods, 2012, 4, 2879–2886 RSC.
  34. A. Islam, M. A. Laskar and A. Ahmad, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2011, 175, 201–212 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  35. A. Islam, M. A. Laskar and A. Ahmad, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2010, 55, 5553–5561 CrossRef CAS.
  36. R. J. Murphy and G. Svehla, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1978, 99, 115–124 CrossRef CAS.
  37. Z. M. Zaki and G. G. Mohamed, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2000, 56, 1245–1250 CrossRef.
  38. E. Zambrzycka and B. Godlewska-Zylkiewicz, Microchim. Acta, 2014, 181, 1019–1027 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. B. Morelli, Analyst, 1982, 107, 282–287 RSC.
  40. H. G. Seiler, A. Sigel and H. Sigel, Handbook on Metals in Clinical and Analytical Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, 1998 Search PubMed.
  41. A. Islam, H. Ahmad, N. Zaidi and S. Yadav, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 52, 5213–5220 CrossRef CAS.
  42. A. Islam, M. A. Laskar and A. Ahmad, Talanta, 2010, 81, 1772–1780 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. G. Socrates, Infrared Characteristic Group Frequencies, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980 Search PubMed.
  44. R. S. Drago, Physical Methods in Inorganic Chemistry, Litton Education Publishing, 1965 Search PubMed.
  45. D. Prabhakaran and M. S. Subramanian, Talanta, 2003, 59, 1227–1236 CrossRef CAS.
  46. D. M. Adams and J. B. Cornell, J. Chem. Soc. A, 1967, 884–889 RSC.
  47. F. Zucarello, G. Buemi, C. Gandolfo and A. Contino, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2003, 59, 139–151 CrossRef.
  48. R. G. Pearson, J. Chem. Educ., 1968, 45, 643–648 CrossRef CAS.
  49. R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1963, 85, 3533–3539 CrossRef CAS.
  50. I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1918, 40, 1361–1403 CrossRef CAS.
  51. Y. A. Zolotov, Pure Appl. Chem., 1978, 50, 129–148 CrossRef CAS.
  52. G. L. Long and J. D. Winefordner, Anal. Chem., 1983, 55, 712A–724A CrossRef CAS.
  53. A. Bartyzel and E. M. Cukrowska, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2011, 707, 204–209 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  54. B. Godlweska-Zylkiewicz, B. Lesniewska and I. Wawreniuk, Talanta, 2010, 83, 596–604 CrossRef PubMed.
  55. T. Dasbasi, S. Sacmaci, A. Ulgen and S. Kartal, Food Chem., 2015, 174, 591–596 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  56. Y. Wang, T. Tian, L. Wang and X. Hu, Microchim. Acta, 2013, 180, 235–242 CrossRef CAS.
  57. A. Denizli, B. Garipcan, A. Karabakan, R. Say, S. Emir and S. Patir, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2003, 30, 3–10 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Further information on the thermal stability and sorption characteristics of PTB; a TGA/DTA curve, a plot for effect of time on sorption, Langmuir and Freundlich sorption isotherms and a table for separation factor RL. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra03163j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.