Ioana Vasilescua,
Sandra A. V. Eremia*a,
Ramona Penua,
Camelia Albua,
Antonio Radoib,
Simona C. Litescua and
Gabriel-Lucian Radua
aCentre of Bioanalysis, National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, 296 Splaiul Independentei, 060031 Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: sandraeremia@gmail.com; Fax: +40 4021 2200 900; Tel: +40 4021 2200 900
bNational Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnology (IMT-Bucharest), 126 A Erou Iancu Nicolae, 077190 Bucharest, Romania
First published on 24th November 2014
In this work a novel sensor array platform based on a dual carbon screen-printed electrode was developed for the simultaneous determination of chlorogenic acid and caffeine. One of the carbon working electrodes was modified with platinum nanoparticles, reduced graphene oxide and laccase (C-SPE/Pt-NPs/RGO/lacc-biosensor) for chlorogenic acid determination and the second carbon working electrodes was modified with reduced graphene oxide and Nafion (C-SPE/RGO/Nafion-sensor) for caffeine determination. Cyclic voltammetry was used to characterise and optimise the dual sensor array while chronoamperometry was used to investigate the bioelectrocatalytic response. The C-SPE/Pt-NPs/RGO/lacc for biosensing chlorogenic acid exhibited a sensitivity of 0.02 μA μM−1 and a detection limit of 2.67 μM whereas the C-SPE/RGO/Nafion used for sensing caffeine has showed a sensitivity of 1.38 μA μM−1 and a detection limit of 0.22 μM. The developed sensor array was used to determine these two major coffee bean compounds from real coffee samples. Due to its simplicity, feasibility and accessibility, the developed dual sensor array could represent the basis of a valuable analytical tool able to screen both chlorogenic acid and caffeine content from coffee samples offering important information about the phytochemical composition of the samples.
Coffee is considered to have the highest amount of phenolics, their content being influenced by the coffee beans origin. Among these polyphenols, chlorogenic acids are the most abundant, representing up to 12% of dry matter of coffee beans.1 Chlorogenic acid is a naturally occurring compound being an ester of caffeic acid and quinic acid, found in raw coffee beans and it is usually destroyed when coffee beans are roasted.7,8 Chlorogenic acids are usually characterised using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).9,10 However there are also several electrochemical methods developed for the determination of chlorogenic acid. Yardim et al. have developed two electrochemical methods for the determination of chlorogenic acids using boron-doped diamond electrode.11,12 Santos et al. have also developed a molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor for the selective detection of chlorogenic acid onto gold bare electrode surface and successfully applied for the determination of chlorogenic acid from coffee samples.13 Literature survey has revealed the construction of two biosensors for chlorogenic acid determination, the first one based on ionic liquid containing iridium nanoparticles and polyphenol oxidase obtained from the sugar apple tissue,14 while the second biosensor was being based on bean sprout homogenate immobilised into chitosan.15
Another compound present in coffee that has significant pharmacological effects is caffeine. Caffeine is a purine alkaloid known for its various health effects when consumed with moderation: it increases energy availability, it decreases fatigue, it boosts physical performance, it increases alertness and wakefulness, it increases the ability to focus, etc.16 However, when consumed in large doses it can cause many undesired effects such as cardiovascular diseases, depression, oversensitivity, anxiety, irritability and even addiction, etc.17 Various methods have been described for the detection of caffeine from coffee: ultraviolet spectrophotometry,18 high performance liquid chromatography with appropriate detection (e.g. diode array),19,20 gas chromatography21 and electrochemical methods.22–24
Therefore, considering the health effects and the unwanted side effects of caffeine and the beneficent antioxidant character of chlorogenic acid the simultaneous determination of caffeine and chlorogenic acid from coffee samples could be of great importance for food safety and food and beverages industry. A literature review has revealed the existence of several methods able to concomitantly determine chlorogenic acid and caffeine from coffee. De Maria et al. have developed a method for the simultaneous detection of chlorogenic acid and caffeine in green coffee using high performance gel filtration chromatography.25 One other method for the simultaneous detection of chlorogenic acid and caffeine was developed by Yardim et al. and it is based on adsorptive stripping voltammetry.12
In this context there is the demand for simple, low cost, low reagent consumption and rapid analytical methods or instruments to determine chlorogenic acids and caffeine from coffee samples. Therefore, in the present work we have developed a simple and cost effective dual electrochemical platform for the simultaneous detection of chlorogenic acid and caffeine from coffee samples.
When dealing with electrochemical detection the electrode surface has a key role in obtaining the advantages offered against classical methods. An important aspect concerning electrochemical sensors and enzyme-based biosensors is obtaining signal amplification and therefore higher sensitivities and lower detection limits could be achieved. The authors have already developed a laccase based biosensor having very low limits of detection and high sensitivity when using caffeic acid as laccase substrate, due to the use of platinum nanoparticles as support for enzyme immobilisation.26 Platinum nanoparticles when deposited onto carbon surfaces maximises the electrocatalytic surface area and therefore improve the electrocatalytic activity. When used to immobilise enzymes, platinum nanoparticles enhance the electron transfer between enzyme and electrode surface without the need of using a mediator.27 Graphene oxides and reduced graphene oxides are used frequently in combination with noble metal nanoparticles in order to form nanocomposites/derivatives with improved electrocatalytic properties ascribed to enhanced catalytic activity of noble metal nanoparticles.28 Reduced graphene oxide, an inexpensive material having good mechanical and thermal properties, represents a novel platform for enzyme immobilisation due to its ability to adsorb the enzyme by hydrophobic interactions.29
This paper shows the preparation of an electrochemical array consisting of a laccase based biosensor and a modified sensor for the simultaneous amperometric determination of chlorogenic acids and caffeine. The analytical tool was constructed on disposable dual screen-printed carbon electrodes by modifying one working electrode with platinum nanoparticles, reduced graphene oxides and laccase for chlorogenic acid determination while the other working electrode was modified with reduced graphene oxide and Nafion for caffeine detection. Once the dual sensor was optimised it was successfully applied for the determination of chlorogenic acids and caffeine from coffee real samples. To the best of our knowledge this is the first attempt to develop an amperometric dual sensor for the detection of active compounds present in coffee samples.
The micrographs were obtained using a Nova NanoSEM 630 (FEI Company, USA) Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).
The electrochemical cell consisted of dual screen-printed carbon electrodes (DRP-C1110, DropSens). The dual sensor have two elliptical carbon working electrodes (6.3 mm2 each one), a carbon counter electrode and a Ag pseudo-reference electrode, all printed onto a ceramic support (3.4 cm × 1.0 cm).
Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) was obtained by chemically reducing graphene oxide obtained according to Hummers method31 with hydrazine according to Park et al. method.32 The procedure is detailed in Eremia et al.26
The dual screen-printed carbon electrodes were modified accordingly (Fig. 1):
- the first working electrode (WE1) was modified by simply adding 3 μL Pt-NPs directly onto the surface of the carbon screen-printed electrode, then 3 μL of RGO (2 mg mL−1) were added over the Pt-NPs layer and finally 3 μL of laccase solution was adsorbed ensuring an enzymatic activity of approximately 250 mIU. The electrodes were dried at 20 °C between the deposition steps. This modified electrode will be named C-SPE/Pt-NPs/RGO/lacc electrode or laccase biosensor and it was optimised for caffeic acid determination in the previous mentioned work of Eremia et al.26
- the second working electrode (WE2) was modified by adding 3 μL RGO (2 mg mL−1) directly onto the surface of the carbon screen-printed electrode and then allowed to dry at 20 °C followed by the deposition of 3 μL Nafion 0.05 wt% obtained from the proper dilution of Nafion 10 wt% in Milli Q ultra-pure water.
The obtained sensor array was stored at 4 °C on silica gel layer in order to eliminate moistening.
For the amperometric measurements the WE1 was polarised at −0.05 V vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode for the determination of chlorogenic acid, while the WE2 was polarised at +1.3 V vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode for caffeine determination. The same conditions were applied for real samples, too.
Caffeine was quantified using a reversed-phase HPLC-PDA method34 using a mobile phase prepared from 0.1% ortho-phosphoric acid (v/v) in water as solvent A and ACN as solvent B and a Nucleosil 100-10 C18, KROMASIL, 250 × 4.6 mm column. The analyses were performed at 35 °C (temperature column) and the injection volume was 20 μL. For the separation an isocratic elution (solvent A:
solvent B, 90
:
10) was used, with a flow rate of 1 mL min−1, during 30 minutes. The caffeine was detected and quantified at 272 nm wavelength.
All the coffee samples were filtrated before injection using PTFE Syringe Driven Filter Unit 0.2 μm (Macherey-Nagel) and analysed by direct injection in HPLC-PDA-MS system without any prior purification of the sample.
The electrochemical behaviour of caffeine was studied by cyclic voltammetry using different architectures of the WE2 accomplished by immobilising one of the following: (a) Pt nanoparticles, (b) RGO, (c) Nafion, (d) RGO adsorbed onto Pt-NPs and (e) RGO covered by Nafion. The choice of these modifiers will be motivated in the following section.
However, when standards (chlorogenic acid and caffeine) were tested by cyclic voltammetry at the modified electrodes it was noticed that, in the case of caffeine, the modification of the electrode has not improved the transport between the analyte and the electrode surface and rather capacitive phenomena manifested through increased area under the very large oxidation peak, especially in the case of the carbon electrode modified Pt-NPs and RGO (see ESI S1†). In the case of the chlorogenic acid the cyclic voltammetry suggests that the surface modification has improved the analytical performances of the WE1, peak separation decreasing to ΔE = 50 mV (for C-SPE/Pt-NPs/RGO/lacc electrode), from an initial ΔE = 110 mV in the case of the unmodified electrode (see ESI S2†). As reported by Brownson et al.35 the peak potential separation (ΔE) depends on the amount of graphene deposited on the surface of the underlying electrode, reduced peak-to-peak separation marking improved electron kinetic ascribed to electrochemically active edge plane sites in “Zone II”. Therefore, the surface of the second working electrode was modified using only RGO, only Nafion 0.05 wt% or RGO and Nafion 0.05 wt%. Casting the electrode with Nafion was inspired by the work of Torres et al.36 and Zhao et al.37 Fig. 3 shows the cyclic voltammograms of 3 mM caffeine in the presence of different modifiers, used to improve the electron transfer rate between the analyte and the surface of WE2. It can be observed that when Nafion 0.05 wt% was adsorbed onto the electrode surface the signal for caffeine reached 41 μA, more than twice in intensity when compared to the signal obtained only on bare carbon screen-printed electrode (Ipa ∼ 19 μA), despite the findings of Zhao et al. that stated that there is no signal at the bare glassy carbon electrode, fact also disapproved by Torres et al. Furthermore, when RGO was deposited onto the surface of the WE2 a higher peak current (Ipa ∼ 32 μA) for caffeine was obtained also, with respect to the unmodified carbon screen-printed electrode. When Nafion 0.05 wt% was casted over the RGO modified carbon electrode, the oxidation current intensity reached 44 μA, thus a synergy between RGO and Nafion being revealed, meaning that the RGO improved the electron transfer of caffeine due to its increased electrical conductivity and the negatively charged Nafion has allowed the caffeine ions to preconcentrate at the electrode film surface.37 Nafion film also prevented the electrode surface fouling and therefore it represents an advantage when determining caffeine, a compound that easily adsorbs at the electrode surface. Peak potential was almost unchanged, ranging from +1.34 V in the case of C-SPE/RGO/Nafion electrode to +1.36 V for C-SPE/RGO electrode, for the unmodified carbon screen-printed electrode (C-SPE) and the Nafion 0.05 wt% modified screen-printed electrode (C-SPE/Nafion) the anodic peak potential being +1.35 V vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode.
Caffeine electrochemistry was characterised by an oxidation peak at around +1.3 V vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode and no reduction peak on the reverse scan indicating that the electrode process is irreversible.36
In conclusion, in order to obtain the optimum analytical signal the WE1 surface was modified using Pt-NPs, RGO and laccase (C-SPE/Pt-NPs/RGO/lacc), while WE2 surface was modified with RGO and Nafion 0.05 wt% (C-SPE/RGO/Nafion).
The effect of buffer pH on the amperometric response of the laccase based biosensor for chlorogenic acid was tested in acetate buffer at pH values ranging from 3.76–5.50 (the acetate pH range is given by the acetate pKa that is 4.75) (Fig. 4b). The amperometric response was analysed for 10 μM chlorogenic acid at an applied potential of −50 mV vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode. Fig. 4b shows a maximum current intensity at pH 5.00, like in our previous paper,26 and therefore this pH value will be further used in our experiments.
Secondly the caffeine sensor was optimised only with respect to applied potential as the working buffer pH was already settled for the laccase based biosensor. Moreover, considering the target of our work, the determination of caffeine and chlorogenic acid from different coffee samples a slightly acidic buffer is very close to the coffee real samples solutions. From Fig. 5 it can be noticed that the optimum working potential for the caffeine determination was +1.3 V vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 The effect of the applied working potential on the amperometric response of 1 μM caffeine at C-SPE/RGO/Nafion in 0.1 M acetate buffer pH 5.00 (with 0.1 M KCl). |
Cyclic voltammetry was used to rationalize on the nature of the electrode process, the effect of scan rate on the electrocatalysis of chlorogenic acid and caffeine being measured. Fig. S4a and b (see ESI S4†) depicts the relationships between the peak current intensity and the square root of the scan rate for 0.5 mM chlorogenic acid at the C-SPE/Pt-NPs/RGO/lacc and for 1 mM caffeine at the C-SPE/RGO/Nafion in 0.1 M acetate buffer pH 5.00 (with 0.1 M KCl). It can be concluded that Ip is directly proportional with v1/2 for both investigated compounds at the surface of the developed sensor array meaning that the caffeine oxidation and the chlorogenic acid reduction are diffusion controlled processes (with a slight adsorptive contribution).
The concomitant detection of chlorogenic acid and caffeine at the developed sensor surface was tested under the optimal working conditions and the obtained responses are depicted in S3 as well as the calibration plots for both tested compounds in Fig. 6a and b (see ESI S3†). The linear relationships between the concentrations of chlorogenic acid and caffeine, respectively, and current responses are given in Table 1 together with other significant analytical parameters. The linear response range for chlorogenic acid is 2.91 × 10−6 to 2.64 × 10−5 M with a regression equation of ip (μA) = 0.017–0.024C (μM); for caffeine it is 2.90 × 10−7 to 2.58 × 10−6 M with a regression equation of ip (μA) = −0.257 + 1.383C (μM). The limits of detection (LoD) were calculated as 3.3 × intercept standard error/sensitivity. The obtained limits of detection for both tested compounds are comparable to the ones found in literature, (Table 2). The dynamic linear range obtained by us for caffeine is narrower when compared to those reported in literature, this limiting factor being ascribed to the nature of the surface of the electrode used in amperometry for detecting caffeine. This compromise was also motivated by the development of a dual sensor array, able to perform chlorogenic acid and caffeine analysis in real coffee sample. However the linearity domain for caffeine was well suited when the sensor array was challenged against coffee samples.
Compound | Sensitivity (μA μM−1) | Linear range (μM) | LoD (μM) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chlorogenic acid | 0.02 | 2.91–26.47 | 2.67 | 0.9889 |
Caffeine | 1.38 | 0.29–2.58 | 0.22 | 0.9967 |
Standard | Modified electrode | Technique | Eapp (V) | Linear working range (μM) | LoD (μM) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chlorogenic acid | Ir-BMI.PF6-PPOx | SWV | — | 3.48–49.50 | 0.91 | 38 |
Tyrosinase alumina sol–gel/sonogel-carbon electrode | Amperometry | −0.30 vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode | 5.00–30.00 | 0.61 | 39 | |
Lacc–CS–MWCNT | Amperometry | −0.20 vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode | 0.79–6.71 | 0.16 | 40 | |
Au-SPE-lacc-Nafion | Amperometry | −0.20 vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode | 3.00–15.00 | 2.80 | 41 | |
C-SPE/Pt-NPs/RGO/lacc-array | Amperometry | −0.05 vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode | 2.91–26.47 | 2.67 | This work | |
Caffeine | ENGR–NCNTs/GCE | SWV | — | 0.06–50.00 | 0.02 | 17 |
MIS/MWCNTs–VTMS/GCE | DPV | — | 0.75–40.00 | 0.22 | 42 | |
PAHNSA/GCE | SWV | — | 0.06–40.00 | 0.13 | 23 | |
GO-Nafion/GCE | DPV | — | 0.40–80.00 | 0.20 | 37 | |
C-SPE/RGO/Nafion-array | Amperometry | +1.30 vs. Ag pseudo-reference electrode | 0.29–2.58 | 0.22 | This work |
The reproducibility of the developed sensor array is important and therefore assessed. Seven repetitive simultaneous measurements were carried out at the surface of the array under the optimal working conditions and the relative standard deviations were calculated 6.4% for chlorogenic acid and 8.7% for caffeine. The storage stability of the developed sensor array was studied by measuring the current response during storage in the optimised conditions. The sensor array maintained the initial response, in terms of current intensity, during the first two weeks, while after two months a response of about 80% from its initial value was obtained for the laccase-based electrode and approximately 90% for C-SPE/RGO/Nafion, respectively.
Table 3 reveals higher values for chlorogenic acid using the developed array than the values obtained by HPLC due to the fact that it is very well-known that the laccase based biosensors are not specific and they are also responding to other polyphenolic compounds that could be also present in the coffee samples.
Sample | Chronoamperometry (μM) | HPLC (μM) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Chlorogenic acid | Caffeine | Chlorogenic acid | Caffeine | |
Carte Noir Café Long Délicat | 92.67 | 9.75 | 123.20 | 7.05 |
Jacobs Espresso | 256.46 | 13.89 | 236.45 | 10.99 |
Segafredo Intermezzo | 247.90 | 10.59 | 176.50 | 10.95 |
Davidoff Espresso | 169.22 | 26.74 | 143.28 | 26.69 |
Grandia Classic | 297.28 | 16.32 | 246.28 | 15.55 |
Davidoff Rich Aroma | 223.21 | 15.77 | 177.67 | 15.85 |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra14464c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |