Elisa
Ivry
a,
Amos
Ben-Asuly
a,
Israel
Goldberg
b and
N. Gabriel
Lemcoff
*a
aChemistry Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel. E-mail: lemcoff@bgu.ac.il
bSchool of Chemistry, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
First published on 29th January 2015
Several amino acid ligands were introduced into the Hoveyda–Grubbs 2nd generation complex by a facile anionic ligand exchange. The chiral pre-catalysts obtained displayed enantioselectivity in asymmetric ring-closing and ring-opening cross-metathesis reactions. Reduction of the lability of the carboxylate ligands was found to be cardinal for improving the observed enantiomeric product enrichment.
Herein, we report on the synthesis of several ruthenium-based olefin metathesis complexes bearing amino acids as chiral anionic ligands and study their efficiency in asymmetric olefin metathesis reactions. The complexes are produced from the most ubiquitous chiral entities in a facile and economical manner, presenting highly tunable options to study this family of asymmetric ruthenium pre-catalysts.
Amines are strong σ-donor ligands capable of coordination to the ruthenium center16 and thus need to be protected when introduced to ruthenium alkylidene solutions. Accordingly, Boc(tert-butyloxycarbonyl) N-substituted amino acids were chosen as starting materials. The protected amino acids were converted to their silver carboxylate salts to ensure complete substitution of both chlorides and 2.1 equivalents of the corresponding silver salts were introduced into a THF solution of a commercially available Hoveyda–Grubbs 2nd generation complex17 (Table 1). Interestingly, the use of methylene chloride as the solvent medium led to unsatisfactory results and decomposition of the amino acid ruthenium complexes. Visibly, complexes in methylene chloride solution significantly decomposed after 24 hours, affording an aldehyde by-product and exposing the fragility of these complexes compared to their dichloro counterparts (see ESI†).18 Filtration of the precipitated silver chloride and evaporation of the solvent afforded the products as deep purple solids. Using this straightforward protocol, complexes Ru-G, Ru-A, Ru-L and Ru-F bearing Boc protected glycine, alanine, leucine and phenylalanine, respectively, were prepared. All complexes were obtained in good yields and were duly characterized by NMR spectroscopy, HRMS and specific rotation measurements (Table 1 and ESI†). As an exception, the use of the Boc-valine and Boc-proline amino acids produced a mixture of the starting material along with mono- and di-substituted ruthenium complexes, probably due to the higher steric congestion introduced by the isopropyl and pyrrolidine side groups (see ESI†). Notably, while complex Ru-F has a specific rotation of −37.5°, the specific rotation of Boc-phenylalanine (Boc-phenylalanine was the only protected amino acid used soluble in toluene) was measured to be +27.6°, strongly suggesting that optical rotation of polarized light is caused by the complex itself and not by dissociated amino acid in solution. Complex Ru-G was also characterized by single crystal X-ray spectroscopy, showing the typical η2 hapticity for one of the carboxylate ligands (Fig. 1).
Complex | R substituent | Yield (%) | Benzylidene hydrogena (ppm) | Specific rotationb (°) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reaction conditions: THF, 37 °C, 3 hours.a C6D6, 400 MHz, for full NMR spectra see ESI.b Specific rotation measured in toluene at [α]23D. | ||||
Hoveyda–Grubbs II | — | — | 16.72 | 0.00 |
Ru-G | H | 94 | 17.99 | 0.00 |
Ru-A | CH3 | 95 | 17.62 | +38.3 |
Ru-L | CH2(CH3)2 | 77 | 17.58 | −18.2 |
Ru-F | CH2Ph | 87 | 17.73 | −37.5 |
Ru-DA | CH3 | 78 | 17.61 | −38.5 |
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 ORTEP representation (50% probability ellipsoids) of complex Ru-G. Hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity. |
The catalytic efficiency of complexes Ru-G, Ru-A, Ru-L and Ru-F was tested in ARCM and AROCM benchmark reactions.7b The initial results showed excellent conversions for AROCM of norbornene 1 and ARCM of triene 2 (Table 2), but with very poor enantioselectivities. Alanine complex Ru-A afforded the highest enantioselectivity with just 20% ee. Lowering the temperature to 0 °C improved the ee to 27%, yet significantly reduced the conversion.
Entry | Substrate | Product | Catalyst | Conversiona [%] | ee [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AROCM conditions: 8.0 mol% catalyst loadings, 13.0 equivalents of styrene, 55 mM substrate in THF, 37 °C, 2 hours. ARCM conditions: 8.0 mol% catalyst loadings, 55 mM substrate in THF, 37 °C, 2 hours.a Conversion was monitored by GC-MS.b ee was determined by HPLC (Reprosil chiral-NR, 8 μm, 150 × 4.5 mm).c 2.5 mol%.d 7.0 mol%. | |||||
1 | 1 | 3 | Hoveyda–Grubbs IIc | 100 | 0 |
2 |
![]() |
![]() |
Ru-G | 100 | 0 |
3 | Ru-A | 100 | 4 | ||
4 | Ru-DA | 100 | 4 | ||
5 | Ru-F | 100 | 4 | ||
6 | 2 | 4 | Hoveyda–Grubbs IIc | 100 | 0 |
7 |
![]() |
![]() |
Ru-G | 83 | 0 |
8 | Ru-F | 93 | 0 | ||
9 | Ru-L | 100 | 12 | ||
10 | Ru-A | 100 | 20 | ||
11 | Ru-DA | 100 | 20 |
An advantage of this methodology is that amino acids are readily available in their mirror-image forms and thus hold a valuable key for major product selection. To demonstrate the ease with which a specific enantiomer may be obtained, readily available N-Boc protected D-alanine was used to synthesize Ru-DA under the same conditions described previously. Ru-DA displayed NMR spectra identical to those of Ru-A and opposite specific rotation (Table 1). As expected, asymmetric ring closing of triene 2 catalyzed by Ru-DA readily provided excess of the opposite enantiomeric product to that obtained by the use of Ru-A (Table 2, entries 10 and 11) as shown by the different chiral HPLC chromatograms (see ESI†). For both metathesis reactions we expected increased ee as the size of the substituent of the amino acid increased (i.e. highest ee for Ru-F); yet Table 2 displays the opposite trend. This seems to imply that a fine balance between steric hindrance and electronic effects is required in order to obtain satisfactory asymmetric induction. While greater steric stress in the asymmetric environment could contribute to higher enantioselectivity, we hypothesized that steric hindrance may also lead to enhanced ligand dissociation, leading to a detrimental outcome. Ligands at the anionic positions in Hoveyda–Grubbs type complexes are known for their lability and dynamic nature, and were shown in solution to dissociate as a part of a degenerate ligand exchange.19 Both reduced complex stability and ligand dissociation may be the cause for the low enantioselectivities observed in Table 2.
In order to study the specific lability of the amino acid ligands used, disproportionation of Ru-A and Ru-F in the presence of Boc-glycine silver salt (Scheme 1) was monitored by 1H-NMR. Qualitative inspection of the carbene region disclosed a faster exchange of the Boc-phenylalanine ligand by the Boc-glycine ligand, compared to the Boc-alanine ligand. This observation falls in line with our assumption that greater steric stress in the system facilitates ligand dissociation. Since the chiral induction in our system originates from the anionic ligand, greater ligand dissociation can severely hamper the enantioselectivity obtained. In order to achieve enantioselectivity without a chiral NHC ligand, it is reasonable to assume that both chiral anionic ligands must be associated with the ruthenium center during the stereochemistry determining step. In related work, Grela et al. probed the asymmetric efficiency of a chiral at metal ruthenium pre-catalyst.20 The complex, bearing two, not labile, achiral anionic ligands (trifluoroacetate and iodide ligands), was isolated in its optically pure form. Lack of enantioselectivity in this system was explained by a fast racemization mechanism of the propagating species and underlined the need for a permanent asymmetric induction derived directly from the ligands for asymmetric olefin metathesis.
To further support the hypothesis that ligand lability was hampering enantioselectivity, an ARCM reaction catalyzed by Ru-A was carried out in the presence of excess of Boc-alanine silver salt (Table 3, entries 1 and 2). To our satisfaction, an increase in ee from 20% to 34% was observed by this protocol (alongside increased isomerization of the substrate11j,21). Continuing with this line of reasoning, the reaction was repeated in a less polar solvent to inhibit ligand dissociation. Indeed, changing the solvent to benzene (ENT benzene = 0.111; ENT THF = 0.207)22 increased the ee to 44% (Table 3, entry 3), while the addition of excess of Boc-alanine silver salt in this solvent afforded an enantiomeric excess value of 56% (Table 3, entry 4). Thus, just by changing the solvent polarity and adding excess anionic ligand, the enantioselectivity could be steadily increased from 20% to 56%. Unfortunately, further reduction of solvent polarity by using benzene/hexane 1:
1 and 2
:
1 mixtures led to extremely low conversions (ENT hexane = 0.009). The above experiments clearly confirm the profound impact the dynamic nature of the anionic ligand has on the course of this reaction and dictates the path for future optimization of this promising protocol in asymmetric olefin metathesis.
Entry | Solvent | Additivea | Conversionb [%] | ee [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARCM conditions: 8.0 mol% catalyst loadings, 55 mM substrate in solvent, 37 °C, 2 hours.a 40 mol% with respect to Ru-A.b Conversion was monitored by GC-MS.c ee was determined by HPLC (Reprosil chiral-NR, 8 μm, 150 × 4.5 mm).d Accompanied by cycloisomerization products.11j,21 | ||||
1 | THF | — | 100 | 20 |
2 | THF | Ala-OAg | 89d | 34 |
3 | Benzene | — | 92d | 44 |
4 | Benzene | Ala-OAg | 63d | 56 |
In conclusion, five ruthenium complexes bearing amino acids as anionic ligands were synthesized and characterized. The chiral complexes were probed in asymmetric ring closing metathesis and asymmetric ring opening cross-metathesis, showing high conversions, albeit with poor enantioselectivity. Notably, the use of Boc-D-alanine as the anionic ligand for the ruthenium complex readily provided excess of the opposite enantiomer product in ARCM. To the best of our knowledge, this series represents the first chiral ruthenium alkylidenes not containing asymmetric NHC ligands that display enantioselectivity in olefin metathesis reactions. Surprisingly, the least sterically hindered chiral ligand, Boc-alanine, was the one to afford the highest ee suggesting that lability of the amino acid ligands plays an important role in the loss of enantioselectivity. This hypothesis was supported by the fact that Boc-phenylalanine was found to exchange more rapidly than Boc-alanine, and that the addition of excess Boc-alanine promptly improved the enatioselectivity for ARCM. Moreover, changing the reaction medium to a less polar solvent also had a beneficial effect on the enantioselectivity, raising the ee over 50%. The approach presented herein provides facile synthesis protocols using readily available commercial starting materials, easy access to a specific enantiomeric product by a simple choice of the appropriate amino acid symmetry and an extensive chiral pool of readily available amino acid or peptide ligands to study. The introduction of dipeptides and alternative chiral anionic ligands that may strengthen the binding to the ruthenium center20 opens a window to combinatorial studies in this area and is currently being probed to improve these promising first results.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis, characterization and activity of all new complexes, and CIF file for Ru-G. CCDC 1037063. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c5cc00052a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |