Youbo Di*a,
Wenjuan Yangb,
Xiaojie Lic,
Zhou Zhaoa,
Meirong Wanga and
Jinming Daia
aCollege of Textile Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China. E-mail: youbodi@163.com
bDepartment of Research and Development, Tianjin TEDA Filters Co., LTD, Tianjin 300462, China
cKey Laboratory of Advanced Textile Composite Materials of Ministry of Education, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
First published on 8th October 2014
An easy spinning-based strategy was developed to fabricate polyacrylonitrile nanofibers as a precursor to obtaining continuous carbon nanofiber (CCNF) mats after carbonization. The composite membrane was then prepared by incorporating CCNFs into sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) for application in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and tensile strength tests were used to characterize plain SPEEK and composite membranes. All dense composite membranes were found to have excellent water swelling, high mechanical performance, good proton conductivity, and low methanol permeability. The composite membrane with 0.51 wt% CCNFs displayed a proton conductivity of 0.041 S cm−1 at room temperature and was fully hydrated. Moreover, the relative selectivity of the hybrid membrane with 2.52 wt% CCNFs was 1.5 times higher than that of a pure SPEEK membrane. These results showed that the CCNF-supported SPEEK membranes were promising polyelectrolyte membranes for fuel cell applications.
Accordingly, various PEMs have been studied to replace Nafion. Among the potential PEMs reported to date, sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) is attracting considerable attention because of its low cost and excellent mechanical and chemical properties.7 However, SPEEK also has some drawbacks in its practical application because membrane properties depend too strongly on the degree of sulfonation (DS). The SPEEK membrane in highly sulfonated DS (above 70%) accommodates too much water, which allows them to swell in aqueous solutions and even soluble in aqueous methanol solutions. Thus, low dimensional stability led to poor PEMs performance and could not be used as PEM.
However, the low DS (below 50%) of SPEEK membranes shows very low conductivity. For practical use, PEM must possess excellent mechanical properties and high proton conductivity simultaneously. Thus, the proton conductivity of SPEEK membrane at relatively low DS (with outstanding mechanical properties by nature) should be improved. For this purpose, several inorganic materials such as zirconium phosphate, tungstosilicic acid, imidazoles, and tungstophosphoric, have been applied.8–13 Recently, carbon-based materials ranging from activated carbons (ACs) to carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are used as fillers in PEMs to improve their mechanical property, thermal stability, and proton conductivity.14–16 In past studies, carbon-based materials are considered to be good electronic conductors. However, the effect of such materials on proton conductivity has not been thoroughly investigated. Based on semi-empirical quantum mechanical calculations, Zaporotskova et al. discussed proton conduction by relay and hopping mechanism along CNTs.17
Nevertheless, the properties of CNT composites mostly depend on the chosen polymeric matrix and the processing used to make the composites. Dispersing carbon nanotubes well in a matrix and forming good interfaces with polymer chains are difficult because of their smooth surfaces and agglomeration.18,19 Compared with particles, continuous carbon nanofibers (CCNFs) can be used without these concerns; moreover, CCNF mats could be easily blended with polymer matrix and uniformly located in an electrolyte polymer membrane. This kind of fiber-supported composite membrane is expected to possess excellent physical properties and performance.20–23
The solution blowing process provides a simple and versatile method for fabricating the precursor polymers of continuous carbon nanofibers. In the process, polymer solution streams are pressurized out then rapidly attenuated into fibers using a high-speed gas flow. Without considering the electric field interference as in electrospinning, using a die assembly containing a serial of orifices is possible. Using a die assembly possesses several advantages such as convenient operation and mass productivity. The solution blowing process has been recently used with several natural and synthesized polymers to produce ultrafine polymer fibers in the range of a few hundred nanometers in diameter.24–28
In the present work, solution blowing was used as a new strategy to produce CCNFs and a new class of polyelectrolyte membranes based on SPEEK filled with nanofibrous webs that have been prepared and evaluated for suitability in PEMFCs. A polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber mat was initially fabricated through the solution blowing process. Then, CCNFs were obtained through followed stabilization and carbonization treatment. Subsequently, the CCNFs mats were infused into the SPEEK solution to form pore-filled membranes. CCNFs impregnation further improves proton conductivity, proton stability, and the water retention properties of the SPEEK membrane. This process offers a promising strategy on the rational design of high-performance PEMs.
Samples | Membrane thickness (cm) | Methanol permeability (10−7 cm2 s−1) | Relative selectivity (104 S s cm−3) |
---|---|---|---|
SPEEK | 0.0050 | 6.1 | 5.08 |
CCNF/SPEEK (0.51%) | 0.0061 | 6.4 | 6.41 |
CCNF/SPEEK (1.03%) | 0.0067 | 6.5 | 6.46 |
CCNF/SPEEK (1.49%) | 0.0075 | 6.7 | 7.46 |
CCNF/SPEEK (2.52%) | 0.0083 | 7.1 | 7.89 |
The tensile strength of the composite membranes were measured with an Instron universal testing machine (3369, USA). The membranes were prepared with dimensions of 20 mm × 70 mm. The distance between the two grips of Instron was approximately 40 mm, and the tensile speed of the grips is set at 50 mm min−1.
The water uptake (WU) and swelling ratio (SR) of the membranes were determined by measuring the weight and dimensional differences between the fully hydrated and dried membranes. The WU and SR of the membranes were calculated from:
![]() | (1) |
SR = (Sw − Sd)/Sd | (2) |
The proton conductivity of the samples was measured using the two electrodes.30 All of the membrane samples were in their protonated state, and the condition of measurement was 100% humidified. The proton conductivity, σ, was calculated from the impedance data, using the relationship:
![]() | (3) |
The methanol permeability was measured in an isothermal bath at 25 °C using a two-chamber diffusion cell method with a 10 M methanol solution. A detailed procedure was reported previously.7 The concentration of the methanol in the water cell was determined by using a HP6890N gas chromatograph. Methanol permeability was calculated from:
![]() | (4) |
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 SEM images of (a) as-spun PAN nanofibers, (b) carbon nanofibers, (c) cross-sectional and (d) surface of CCNF/SPEEK membrane with CCNFs content of 1.03%. |
Fig. 2c and d show images of the surface and cross-section of a composite membrane CCNF/SPEEK with a CCNFs mass fraction of 1.03%. Fig. 2c shows that the CCNFs were totally immersed into a SPEEK phase and dispersed loosely in the matrix. The nanfibers are dispersed well in the through-thickness direction, rather than gathered as a thin layer because CCNFs were continuous fibers and accumulated as nonwoven mats that could maintain their shape during the impregnation process.31 No significant crack was observed, which indicates the good compatibility between the carbonaceous nanofibers and the SPEEK phase mainly due to the small diameter of CCNFs. Notably, the voids observed in the SEM picture is due to the nanofiber tearing apart when the membrane was cut so that the transversal section can be observed. Thus, no porosity remains during the membrane preparation. Finally, Fig. 2d shows a surface image of the composite membrane. The membrane was totally compact, i.e., no porosity could be observed.
The interaction between CNF and SPEEK matrix was confirmed by FT-IR analysis. As shown in Fig. 4, the spectrum of SPEEK shows characteristic peaks at 1024.25 cm−1 assigned to the stretching vibrations of SO group, and 1078.65 and 1218.69 cm−1 to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of O
S
O group, respectively. While the peaks shifted to 1025.30, 1081.07 and 1220.97 cm−1 respectively for the membrane of CCNF/SPEEK with 2.25% CCNFs content.33,34 And other peaks (708.56 cm−1 for S–O group and 1645.31 cm−1 for –Ar–C(
O)–Ar– group) also shifted.35
TGA curves of pristine and composite SPEEK membranes are shown in Fig. 5. The figure shows the onset of desulfonation at 350 °C and the backbone degradation of SPEEK at around 500 °C for all membrane systems. The char yield of CCNF/SPEEK was higher than the pure SPEEK, which mainly originated from the addition of CCNFs. According to EDX analysis, the composition of CCNF include C, O and Cu, and their content are 93.59%, 3.02% and 3.21% in atomic percentage, respectively. Here, the existence of Cu was due to the copper grid which the CCNF was put on. So the CCNF are almost C element and a small quantity of O which was introduced in the carbonization process. These TGA curves suggested that all the membranes are suitable for proton conducting materials in terms of thermal stability.
Fig. 6 shows the stress–strain curves of the test membranes obtained from the mechanical measurements. As shown, the mechanical properties of CCNF/SPEEK membranes were further improved by introducing CCNFs. The composite membranes exhibited much higher tensile strength and lower percentage elongation when the stretch reached a stable state as CCNF content increased from 0.51 wt% to 2.5 wt%, compared with pure SPEEK membrane. The reason is that CCNFs included into the polymer matrix behave like physical crosslinking points and restrict the movements of polymer chains.36 The interlocking between matrix and fibers reinforced the composite and restrict the movements of polymer chains.37–39
The water uptake is one of important parameters for PEM because water can not only facilitate the dissociation of the protons from –SO3H groups but also promotes the micro-phase separation for water-filled channel to transport protons. In the present study, all membranes have been studied at various temperatures from 20 °C to 80 °C. At an immersion temperature of 20 °C, the WU of the pristine SPEEK 61 was 32% and it monotonically increased with CCNF content to 36%, 38%, 41%, and 44% for the 0.51 wt%, 1.03 wt%, 1.49 wt%, and 2.5 wt% composite, respectively (Fig. 7a). Ghasemi et al. and Hou et al. reported similar conclusions in their study.40,41
Although the WU increased, the SR of composite membranes was in controllable range. The temperature increased, and the swelling ratio of CCNF/SPEEK (1.03%) increased from 29.5% to 32.3%. The swelling ratio of SPEEK increased from 26.5% to 34.1% (Fig. 7b). The introduced CCNF led to a slight increase in SR value with increased temperature. The composite membranes exhibited relatively stable swelling due to the non-expandable nature of CCNF. Moreover, the introduced CCNFs were continuous and intertwined as nonwoven mats that could restrain the swelling of the membranes.24
The increasing WU in the hybrid membrane synergistically enhanced charge transport because sufficient hydronium ions can now propagate the aqueous phases. Fig. 8 shows the dependence of the conductivity at varying temperatures. At 20 °C, the conductivity of the pure SPEEK membrane was 0.031 S cm−1. The conductivity increased from 0.041 S cm−1 to 0.056 S cm−1 as CCNF content increased. Fig. 8 shows that the conductivities of the pure SPEEK membrane was below those of the CCNF/SPEEK membranes, which is related with the lower WU found in the former membrane. Compared with pure SPEEK, the ion-exchange capability of CCNF also enhanced the proton conduction properties of composite membrane. Moreover, the fiber morphology of continuous carbonaceous nanofibers can enhance proton conduction characteristics. Hasani-Sadrabadi also showed that the ionomeric nanofibers can be carried out to promote proton conductivity.42 Moreover, the conductivity of the membranes increased when the temperature was from 20 °C to 80 °C, which indicates that proton conduction is a thermally activated process.
Above all, the composite membranes had high proton conductivity. Membranes used for PEMFCs must have high proton conductivity and possess an effective barrier function to stop methanol crossover from anode to cathode. Fig. 9 shows that the methanol permeability of composite membrane was low and exhibited slight modification compared with the pure SPEEK membrane. This phenomenon could be attributed to the strong interfacial interactions between SPEEK and the CCNFs nonwoven mats with a large surface area (described in Section 3.1), which restrained the methanol permeation as we expected.
With high proton conductivity of composite membranes, the slight modification of methanol permeability was not affecting the selectivity (the ratio of the proton conductivity to the methanol permeability).43 The selectivity was commonly used as a guideline for the evaluation of the comprehensive performance of membrane.
Fig. 9 shows that the higher selectivity of the composite membranes was obtained, and the relative selectivity of the composite membranes increased as CCNF content increased.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |